Biomarker of Exposure Reductions Upon Switching for 5 Days from Cigarettes to a Carbon Heated Tobacco Product (CHTP 1.0)

Similar documents
A study to examine changes in exposure to cigarette smoke chemicals when a smoker switches to using a tobacco heating product. Part I: Study Design.

Scientific Evidence for Evaluating Modified Risk Tobacco Products

Heated Tobacco Technology: Science, Behavior and Avoiding Unintended Consequences

Carl D. D Ruiz 1*, Donald W. Graff 2 and Edward Robinson 3

Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology

Changes in Biological and Functional Markers after Six Months, in Three Populations: THS 2.2 (IQOS ) Users, Continued Smokers, and Smoking Abstinence

Evaluation of Nicotine Pharmacokinetics and Subjective Effects following Use of a Novel Nicotine Aerosol System

Biomarker Comparisons Between Adult Menthol and Non-Menthol Cigarette Smokers

Air Quality assessment during indoor use of the Tobacco Heating System 2.2

Principal Investigator and Study Center: F. Nobuoka, MD Ageo Medical Clinic, 3133 Haraichi, Ageo City, Saitama , Japan

Analysis and Evaluation of a Cross-Sectional Study IEA World Congress of Epidemiology 20 th August Saitama, Japan

TOBACCO HARM REDUCTION:

Air Quality assessment during indoor use of the Tobacco Heating System 2.2

CARDIOVASCULAR EFFECTS OF THE TOBACCO HEATING SYSTEM (THS) 2.2 COMPARED WITH CONTINUED SMOKING

CARDIOVASCULAR EFFECTS OF THE TOBACCO HEATING SYSTEM (THS) 2.2 COMPARED WITH CONTINUED SMOKING

Actual Use Study of the Potential Reduced-Risk Product (RRP): Tobacco Heating System (THS)

Oncology Drug Development: Phase I Case Studies in Healthy Volunteers. Mike Di Spirito, MSc 22-March-2018 ASCPT

Quantitative Risk Assessment of Tobacco-Burning and Tobacco-Heating Cigarettes

Assessment of the Tobacco Heating System (THS) 2.2, A Candidate Modified Risk Tobacco Product: From Concept to Early Clinical Data

Evaluation of the Potential for Second-hand Exposure to E-cigarette Aerosol in an Office Environment

Tobacco Heating System 2.2, A Candidate Modified Risk Tobacco Product: Cardiovascular Disease Risk Assessment

Heat-not-Burn Products: Scientific Assessment of Risk Reduction

Global list of validated analytes available at ABF (in alphabetic order)

Tobacco Control Research and Education, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA

What is combustion and why is the absence of combustion important for heat not burn products

Investor Day Reduced-Risk Products Lausanne, September 29, 2016

Reduced nicotine content cigarettes: effects on toxicant exposure, dependence and cessationadd_

Analysis of 18 Urinary Mercapturic Acids by two Multiplex-LC-MS/MS Methods

Effects of Switching to the Menthol Tobacco Heating System 2.2, Smoking Abstinence, or Continued Cigarette Smoking on Clinically

Urinary biomarkers of smokers exposure to tobacco smoke constituents in tobacco products assessment: a fit for purpose approach

Cardiovascular effects of nicotine vs. cigarette smoke

Harmful and Potentially Harmful Constituents in Tobacco Products and Tobacco Smoke;

Exposure and Kinetics of Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons (PAHs) in Cigarette Smokers

The importance of offering adult smokers a portfolio of potentially less harmful products

Experimental trial on the effectiveness of IQOS compared to e-cigarettes and regular tobacco cigarettes

The fitness for purpose of existing tobacco product test methods identifying the gaps

Biomarker (BMK) Sub-Group 2017 Report

Embargo Copy - Not for Distribution

A FRAMEWORK FOR THE ASSESSMENT OF REDUCED RISK TOBACCO AND NICOTINE PRODUCTS

PROVINCE OF BRITISH COLUMBIA ORDER OF THE LIEUTENANT GOVERNOR IN COUNCIL

Comparisons Between Adult Menthol and Non-Menthol Smokers Total Exposure Study. Mohamadi Sarkar, M.Pharm., Ph.D Altria Client Services

The IQOS Heating System

Assessing Consumer Responses to RRP: Experience at PMI in Developing Fit-for-Purpose Self-Report Instruments

Reduced-Risk Products Science Update

Exploring five common claims about e-cigarette use. Lion Shahab, PhD University College

UK E-Cigarette Summit Relative risks of cancer posed by combustible and vapourising forms of nicotine delivery: Evidence from chemical exposures

ΕΝΑΛΛΑΚΤΙΚΕΣ ΜΟΡΦΕΣ ΚΑΠΝΙΣΜΑΤΟΣ

Product Standards for Reducing Nicotine in Cigarettes

How innovation will deliver a smokefree

E-cigarettes and personal vapourisers: current research and policy

Global impact of FDA-inspired tobacco regulatory science on jobs for chemists

Might Smoking Rates go up in Flames? Dr John Schoonbee, Chief Medical Officer, Swiss Re

Because PMI application did not report the full range of HPHCs in IQOS aerosol,

THE INFLUENCE OF CIGARETTE FILTER DESIGN ON THE YIELD AND COMPOSITION OF CIGARETTE SMOKE

Low-Nitrosamine Dissolvable Tobacco Products Star Scientific, Inc. Part III Initiation and Cessation

Smoking Behavior and Exposure to Tobacco Toxicants during 6 Months of Smoking Progressively Reduced Nicotine Content Cigarettes

The IQOS Heating System

Harmful and potentially harmful constituents in e-cigarettes

Electronic Cigarettes, Nicotine and Policy Implications

Non Clinical Toxicology of Nicotine and Aerosol from a Heated Tobacco Product. Patrick Vanscheeuwijck, PhD Director Pre-Clinical Toxicology

The IQOS Heating System

New & Emerging Tobacco Products. Linda Bauld & Kamran Siddiqi

Menthol Addition to Cigarettes Using Breakable Capsules in the Filter. Impact on the Mainstream Smoke Yields of the Health Canada List Constituents

Tobacco Blend Style. Dinah Winter, Martin Coleman, Nigel Warren

Smoking and Non-Communicable Diseases in Hong Kong

Menthol Cigarette Report

Schedule of Accreditation issued by United Kingdom Accreditation Service 2 Pine Trees, Chertsey Lane, Staines-upon-Thames, TW18 3HR, UK

Smoking, e-cigs and reduced risk products. Dr John Schoonbee, IMS November 2017

The Family Smoking Prevention and Tobacco

E-Cigarettes: Current Perspective

Research and Development Department, R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Company, Winston-Salem, N.C , USA Dixon Consultancy, Liphook Hampshire, UK

Supplementary Online Content

Clinical Effects. Jane Y. Lewis, Ph.D. Senior Vice President, Health & Analytical Sciences Altria Client Services

Environmental and occupational toxicants

Lung Cancer Epidemiology & Prevention. A/Prof Fraser Brims

Philip Morris International R&D, Philip Morris Products S.A., Switzerland. 2

Using the Balanced-Placebo Design for Parsing Nicotine Administration Effects

Cancer and its Causes in Korea

Study Summary Study THS-PBA-02-US

The Chemical Constituents in Cigarettes and Cigarette Smoke: Priorities for Harm Reduction

David S. Goya, DO, MBA, FCCP, FACP Kaiser Permanente Medical center Santa Clara, California

Nicotine Reduction Workshop Role of nicotine in smoking behaviour

Facts & Issues. Tobacco in Australia. A comprehensive online resource. tobaccoinaustralia.org.au

The Effects of Cigarette Smoking

Tobacco-related risk perceptions in the regulation of tobacco products at the FDA Center for Tobacco Products

Variation in Smoke Toxicant Yields from Selected Cigarettes

I n 1996, the RJ Reynolds Tobacco Company (RJR) began test

pp mono2-section 1.qxd 30/04/ :24 Page 1189 INVOLUNTARY SMOKING

HOPE OR HAZARD? What Research Tells Us About Potentially Reduced-Exposure Tobacco Products

A DISSERTATION SUBMITTED TO THE FACULTY OF THE GRADUATE SCHOOL OF THE UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA BY. Yan Zhong

It is important to split the health issues into their two distinct components-

Responsible Practice in E-Vapour Products (EVP) Product Stewardship

Work in progress in relation to Articles 9 and 10 of the WHO FCTC

Modelling the effects of user exposure to harmful emissions across the spectrum of nicotine delivery

Supplementary Online Content

FDA S CENTER FOR TOBACCO PRODUCTS: AN UPDATE ON REGULATORY ACTIVITIES AND PRIORITIES

reducing smokers exposure to cigarette smoke toxicants

University of Toronto Governing Council

Introduction. Principles

Electronic cigarettes for smoking cessation

Transcription:

Biomarker of Exposure Reductions Upon Switching for Days from to a Carbon Heated Tobacco Product () A. Donelli, C. Tran, C. Haziza, J. Ancerewicz, G. de La Bourdonnaye, R. Weitkunat, and F. Lüdicke 8 healthy adult smokers (age of 21+) were randomly assigned to two groups and asked to: (1) switch from cigarettes to (41 participants) or (2) continue to use their own non-menthol cigarettes (39 participants). Participants were eligible if they smoked 1 commercially available non-menthol cigarettes per day for the last 6 weeks prior admission and had smoked cigarettes for 3 consecutive years before enrollment and were not planning to quit smoking in coming 3 months. Intro PMI R&D, Philip Morris Products S.A. Quai Jeanrenaud, 2 Neuchâtel, Switzerland (part of Philip Morris International group of companies) The Carbon Heated Tobacco Product () is designed to heat tobacco without burning it in order to reduce formation of, and consequently exposure to, harmful and potentially harmful constituents (HPHC) as compared to cigarettes while replicating the ritual, taste, sensory characteristics and nicotine uptake of cigarette smoking. The main objective of this study was to demonstrate the reduction of biomarkers of exposure (BoExp) to selected HPHCs in smokers switching from cigarettes to CHTP 1. as compared to smokers continuing to smoke cigarettes for consecutive days. Among other assessments the nicotine uptake and subjective effects of use were evaluated in this study. 1. is a heat-not-burn product that does not involve tobacco combustion 2. The product generates a nicotine-containing aerosol which has significantly lower levels of HPHCs than cigarettes 3. has been designed to resemble a cigarette as closely as possible Selected Harmful or Potentially Harmful Constituents (HPHC) of tobacco smoke 1 HPHCs IN SMOKE Carbon Monoxide Acrolein 1,3-Butadiene Benzene Nicotine Exposure to HPHCs was assessed by measuring the level of corresponding BoExp in urine and plasma. BoExp can be described as substances measured in human body as a result of ingestion of another substance Results REDUCTION IN HPHCs EXPOSURE: VS CIGARETTES (DAY ) NICOTINE UPTAKE Day levels were reduced, relative to cigarettes, by 8.8% to 88.1% in primary biomarkers COHb, MHBMA, 3-HPMA and SPMA. Other biomarkers were reduced by.6% to 97.1%. For more information see the brochure. Neq (mg/g creat) 1 SUBJECTIVE EFFECTS Nicotine (ng/ml) 2 Cotinine (mg/ml) 4-8.8 % 3 2 1-63. % Constituent: Acrolein 2-82.8 % 1 Constituent: 1,3-Butadiene S-PMA 3 1 Constituent: Carbon Monoxide MHBMA 1 % 3-HPMA Total score 1 COHb Reward (Factor 2) 6 4 CIGARETTES Level of Biomarkers in the group smoking cigarettes Relief (Factor 1) 1-88.1 % Constituent: Benzene Total 1-OHP -.6 % Constituent: Pyrene 4-ABP -78.9 % Constituent: 4-aminobiphenyl 1-NA -97.1 % 1. NEQ level was 3.% lower for the group compared to the cigarette group over all time points. 2. On day, plasma nicotine and cotinine levels were respectively 3.% lower and 2.6% higher in group than in the cigarette group. 1. Cigarette and users scored the products similarly in the urge-to-smoke assessment questionnaire of relief, reward and total scores. 2. The scoring scales of were close to those of cigarettes over the whole study period. Constituent: 1-aminonaphtalene 2-NA -9.1 % Constituent: 2-aminonaphthalene o-toluidine -72.1 % Conclusions Constituent: o-toluidine CEMA -8.8 % Constituent: Acrylonitrile HEMA -6.1 % Constituent: Ethylene Oxide 3-HMPMA -7. % At the end of the day exposure period biomarkers of exposure to HPHCs were markedly reduced upon switching to use, whereas nicotine levels were similar to cigarette smoking. Constituent: Crotonaldehyde Total 3-OH-B[a]P -77.1 % Constituent: Benzo[a]pyrene Total NNAL -7.7 % Smoking urge questionnaire scores indicate similar responses for as for CC, which is encouraging for CHTP adoption as an alternative to CC. NNK Total NNN -7.2 % Constituent: NNN The study was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (ID: NCT2324) For the competing financial interest see the supplementary brochure Global Forum on Nicotine June 1 17, Warsaw, Poland

Biomarker of Exposure Reductions Upon Switching for Days from to a Carbon Heated Tobacco Product () A. Donelli, C. Tran, C. Haziza, J. Ancerewicz, G. de La Bourdonnaye, R. Weitkunat and F. Lüdicke

Introduction and Objectives Methods BACKGROUND DESIGN Carbon Heated Tobacco Product (CHTP 1.) is a heat-not-burn tobacco product designed to heat tobacco without burning it in order to reduce formation of, and consequently exposure to, harmful and potentially harmful constituents (HPHC) as compared to cigarettes, and to replicate the ritual, taste, sensory characteristics and nicotine uptake of cigarette smoking. Randomized, controlled, open-label, 2-arm, parallel group -day confinement study in 8 healthy adult smokers who used ad libitum (n = 41) or continued to smoke their own brand of cigarettes (n = 39). The study was conducted in Poland between July 4th and Aug 2th 21, and measured 1 selected HPHCs assessed in 24-hour urine, or blood. MAIN OBJECTIVES To assess the extent of reduced exposure to a number of HPHCs upon complete switch to use compared to continued cigarette smoking. Nicotine uptake, and subjective effects were also evaluated. Screening n = 124 Unmet criteria n = 39 Enrollment n = 8 Safety population n = 8 Discontinued n = Randomization n = 8 n = 41 n = 39 Completion n = 8 2

PARTICIPANTS SAMPLE SIZE ESTIMATION 1 Subject judged healthy at screening by the Investigator 2 21+ years of age Caucasians, smoking 1 commercially available non-menthol cigarettes (maximum ISO nicotine yield of 1 mg per cigarette) per day for the last 6 weeks prior to admission, based on self-reporting 3 Smoking cigarettes during the last 3 years prior to enrollment 4 Not planning to quit smoking in coming 3 months, but ready to switch from cigarettes to use for days Participants willing to quit smoking after enrolment were encouraged to do so and referred to a smoking cessation counselor. PRODUCT 1 is a heat-not-burn product that does not involve the combustion of tobacco 2 The product generates a nicotinecontaining aerosol which has significantly lower levels of harmful and potentially harmful constituents (HPHCs) compared to cigarettes 3 has been designed to resemble a cigarette as closely as possible A total of 8 participants randomized at a ratio of 1:1 to or cigarette groups, were considered sufficient to attain >8 % power to show a reduction of % in the concentrations of COHb, 3-HPMA, MHBMA, and S-PMA in the group relative to the cigarette group, using a onesided test with 2. % type I error probability. STATISTICAL METHODS 1 Inferential analysis was performed on the endpoints observed on Day 2 Analysis of covariance on log-transformed Day values to estimate the ratios between the study groups (one sided type I error of 2. %) 3 Adjustment for sex, cigarette use over the 6 weeks before enrollment, and the baseline value of the biomarker KEY POINTS 1 Completely switching to use reduced exposure, compared to cigarettes 2 use led to nicotine uptake comparable to cigarette smoking 3 use led to urge-to-smoke results similar to cigarette smoking 3

Results % REDUCTION VS. CIGARETTES (DAY ) Biomarker abbreviation (Biomarker name: smoke constituent) Level of Biomarkers in the group smoking cigarettes 1 % COHb (Carboxyhemoglobin: Carbon Monoxide) -8.8 % 3-HPMA (3-hydroxypropylmercapturic acid: Acrolein) -63. % MHBMA (Monohydroxybutenyl mercapturic acid: 1,3-Butadiene) -82.8 % S-PMA (S-phenylmercapturic acid: Benzene) -88.1 % Total 1-OHP (1-hydroxypyrene: Pyrene) -.6 % 4-ABP (4-aminobiphenyl: 4-aminobiphenyl) -78.9 % 1-NA (1-aminonaphtalene: 1-aminonaphtalene) -97.1 % 2-NA (2-aminonaphthalene: 2-aminonaphthalene) -9.1 % O-toluidine (O-toluidine: O-toluidine) -72.1 % CEMA (2-cyanoethylmercapturic acid: Acrylonitrile) -8.8 % HEMA (2-hydroxyethyl mercapturic acid: Ethylene Oxide) -6.1 % 3-HMPMA (3-hydroxy-1-methylpropylmercapturic acid: Crotonaldehyde) -7. % Total 3-OH-B[a]P (3-hydroxybenzo(a)pyrene: Benzo(a)pyrene) -77.1 % Total NNAL (4-(methylnitrosamino)-1-(3-pyridyl)-1-butanol, 4-(methylnitrosamino)-1-(3-pyridyl)-1-butanone: NNK) -7.7 % Total NNN (N-nitrosonornicotine: NNN) -7.2 % 4

DEMOGRAPHICS CHTP CC Female n (%) 21 (1.2 %) 2 (1.3 %) Age (Mean ± SD) 34.1 ± 1. 32.7 ± 11. Daily CC Consumption n (%) 1 19 cig/day 21 (1.2 %) 19 (48.7 %) >19 cig/day 2 (48.8 %) 2 (1.3 %) ISO Nicotine n (%).6 mg 32 (78. %) 34 (87.2 %) >.6 1 mg 9 (22. %) (12.8 %) FTND Total Score Mean (SD).4 (1.78).8 (2.) BIOMARKERS OF EXPOSURE SAFETY 1 Day levels were reduced, relative to cigarettes, by 8.8 % to 88.1 % in primary biomarkers COHb, MHBMA, 3-HPMA and SPMA 2 Other biomarkers were reduced by.6 % to 97.1 % NICOTINE UPTAKE 1 NEQ level was 3. % lower in the CHTP 1. compared to the cigarette group over all time points 2 On day plasma nicotine and cotinine levels were respectively 3. % lower and 2.6 % higher in group as compared to the cigarettes group 1 No serious adverse events were reported during the study 2 31/41 CHTP subjects (7.6%) and 2/39 subjects (1.3%) experienced adverse events (AE) 3 27.1 % of AEs were mild and 38.8 % were moderate 4 Occurrence of subjects having cough and headache were higher in the CHTP 1. group (32% vs. % for cough and 46 % vs. 23 % for headache)

DAY NICOTINE BIOMARKER LEVELS 1 Neq (mg/g creat) 2 Nicotine (ng/ml) 4 Cotinine (mg/ml) 1 3 1 1 2 1 QUESTIONNAIRE ON SMOKING URGE (BRIEF) 6 Relief (Factor 1) Reward (Factor 2) Total score 4 3 2 1 SUBJECTIVE EFFECTS 1 and users scored similarly in the urge-to-smoke assessment questionnaire of relief, reward and total scores 2 The scoring scales of were close to those of cigarettes over the whole study period 6

SMOKE CONSTITUENT Biomarker Abbreviation Carbon Monoxide Carboxyhemoglobin COHb Acrolein 3-hydroxypropylmercapturic acid 3-HPMA 1,3-Butadiene monohydroxybutenyl mercapturic acid MHBMA Benzene S-phenylmercapturic acid S-PMA Pyrene 1-hydroxypyrene Total 1-OHP 4-aminobiphenyl 4-aminobiphenyl 4-ABP 1-aminonaphtalene 1-aminonaphtalene 1-NA 2-aminonaphthalene 2-aminonaphthalene 2-NA o-toluidine o-toluidine o-toluidine Acrylonitrile 2-cyanoethylmercapturic acid CEMA Ethylene Oxide 2-hydroxyethyl mercapturic acid HEMA Crotonaldehyde 3-hydroxy-1-methylpropylmercapturic acid 3-HMPMA Benzo(a)pyrene 3-hydroxybenzo(a)pyrene Total 3-OH-B[a]P 4-(methylnitrosamino)-1- (3-pyridyl)-1-butanone (NNK) 4-(methylnitrosamino)-1-(3-pyridyl)-1-butanol Total NNAL N-nitrosonornicotine (NNN) N-nitrosonornicotine Total NNN Nicotine Nicotine Nicotine Cotinine Cotinine Nicotine equivalents: free nicotine, nicotineglucuronide, free cotinine, cotinine-glucuronide, free trans-3 -hydroxycotinine, trans-3 - hydroxycotinine-glucuronide Neq Conclusions At the end of the day exposure period, biomarkers of exposure to HPHCs were markedly reduced upon switching to CHTP 1. use, whereas nicotine levels were similar to cigarette smoking. Smoking urge questionnaire scores indicate similar responses for as for CC, which is encouraging for CHTP adoption as an alternative to CC. 7

MORE INFORMATION The study was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (ID: NCT2324) COMPETING FINANCIAL INTEREST FOLLOW /PMISCIENCE The research described in this brochure was sponsored by the Philip Morris International group of companies GLOBAL FORUM ON NICOTINE JUNE 1 17, WARSAW, POLAND