Similar documents
A Validated Practical Risk Score to Predict the Need for RVAD after Continuous-flow LVAD

Right Ventricular Failure: Prediction, Prevention and Treatment

The Who, How and When of Advanced Heart Failure Therapies. Disclosures. What is Advanced Heart Failure?

Multicenter Study of MagLev Technology in Patients Undergoing Mechanical Circulatory Support Therapy with HeartMate 3 (MOMENTUM 3) Long Term Outcomes

Concomitant Aortic Valve Procedures in Patients Undergoing Implantation of Continuous-Flow LVADs: An INTERMACS Database Analysis

Bridge to Heart Transplantation

Right Heart Failure in LVAD patients: Prevention and Management.

Mechanical Circulatory Support in the Management of Heart Failure

Planned, Short-Term RVAD During Durable LVAD Implant: Indications and Management

Predictors and impact of right heart failure severity following left ventricular assist device implantation

Recognition & Treatment of Right Ventricular Failure

เอกราช อร ยะช ยพาณ ชย

Update on Mechanical Circulatory Support. AATS May 5, 2010 Toronto, ON Canada

A Fully Magnetically Levitated Left Ventricular Assist Device. Final Report of the MOMENTUM 3 Trial

What are the indications for Tricuspid valve repair during LVAD Implant RANJIT JOHN, MD UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA

Do we really need an Artificial Heart? No!! John V. Conte, MD, Professor of Surgery Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine

ORIGINAL ARTICLE. Alexander M. Bernhardt a, *, Theo M.M.H. De By b, Hermann Reichenspurner a and Tobias Deuse a. Abstract INTRODUCTION

Acute Circulatory Support Should We or Shouldn t We?

Artificial Heart Program

VAD come Destination therapy nell adulto con Scompenso Cardiaco

Andrew Civitello MD, FACC

Left ventricular assist devices (LVAD) have been demonstrated

How to Develop a Comprehensive Ventricular Assist Device Program

Translating Device and Mechanical Support Guidelines to ACHD Research. Timothy M. Maul, CCP, PhD Perfusionist Sr. Research Scientist

Risk Factors for Adverse Outcome after HeartMate II Jennifer Cowger, MD, MS St. Vincent Heart Center of Indiana

ECMO as a Bridge to Heart Transplant in the Era of LVAD s.

Transfusion & Mortality. Philippe Van der Linden MD, PhD

How to mend a broken heart: transplantation or LVAD?

Mechanical Cardiac Support in Acute Heart Failure. Michael Felker, MD, MHS Associate Professor of Medicine Director of Heart Failure Research

Medical Therapy after LVAD

Complications of VAD therapy - RV failure

Mechanical assist patient selection, device selection, and outcomes

Moderate TR Should be Repaired at the Time of LVAD Con. James Kirklin MD

Regional Differences in Utilization and Outcomes of Left Ventricular Assist Devices: Insights from the INTERMACS Registry

Καθετηριασμός δεξιάς κοιλίας. Σ. Χατζημιλτιάδης Καθηγητής Καρδιολογίας ΑΠΘ

Ramani GV et al. Mayo Clin Proc 2010;85:180-95

Lessons learned from ENDURANCE, ROADMAP, MedaMACS, and how to go forward?

Fifth INTERMACS annual report: Risk factor analysis from more than 6,000 mechanical circulatory support patients

How do Readmissions Impact Survival among Patients with Continuous-Flow Left Ventricular Assist Devices? Findings from INTERMACS

Ventricular Assist Devices for Permanent Therapy: Current Status and Future

Pulmonary Hypertension

Postoperative atrial fibrillation is not an innocuous arrhytmia in LAVD patients

I have nothing to disclose.

What has INTERMACS Taught Us about Patient Outcomes with Durable MCS? James K. Kirklin, MD

Pediatric Mechanical Circulatory Support - What to Use

Case - Advanced HF and Shock (INTERMACS 1)

Why Children Are Not Small Adults? Treatment of Pediatric Patients Needing Mechanical Circulatory Support

Ventricular Assist Device Implant in the Elderly Is Associated With Increased, but Respectable Risk: A Multi-Institutional Study

LVADs as a long term or destination therapy for the advanced heart failure

Effect of Pre-LVAD PVR on Heart Transplant Outcome

Introduction. Roh Yanagida 1 Navin Rajagopalan 2 Daniel L. Davenport 3 Thomas A. Tribble 4 Mark A. Bradley 4 Charles W. Hoopes 5

Predicting Survival in Patients Receiving Continuous Flow Left Ventricular Assist Devices

Journal of the American College of Cardiology Vol. 60, No. 1, by the American College of Cardiology Foundation ISSN /$36.

Destination Therapy SO MUCH DATA IN SUCH A SMALL DEVICE. HeartWare HVAD System The ONLY intrapericardial VAD approved for DT.

Pediatric Mechanical Circulatory Support (MCS)

LVAD Complications, Recovery

Seventh INTERMACS annual report: 15,000 patients and counting

Recent Trials With Durable LVADs: Is There a Superior Device?

DECLARATION OF CONFLICT OF INTEREST

Predicting Major Outcomes after MCSD Implant. Risk Factors for Death, Transplant, and Recovery. James Kirklin, MD David Naftel, PhD

Heart Transplantation is Dead

Outcomes of MCS as a Bridge to Heart Transplantation: Are We Compromising Shortand Long-term Outcomes?

Minimally Invasive Insertion of HVAD

Heart-lung transplantation: adult indications and outcomes

Strengthening Your VAD Program

New ventricular assist devices. FW Mohr Clinical seminar: Devices for severe heart failure ESC congress Stockholm 2010

Intermittent inotropic infusions for the treatment of refractory end stage heart failure: a randomized clinical study

Advances in Advanced Heart Failure Therapies. Disclosures. Management Algorithm for Patients in Cardiogenic Shock

Model for end-stage liver disease predicts right ventricular failure in patients with left ventricular assist devices

Left Ventricular Assist Devices (LVADs): Overview and Future Directions

Acute Mechanical Circulatory Support Right Ventricular Support Devices

HeartWare ADVANCE Bridge to Transplant Trial and Continued Access Protocol Update

The Pathophysiology of Cardiogenic Shock Knowledge Gaps & Opportunities

EMS: Care of the VAD Patient. Brittany Butzler BSN RN VAD Coordinator Froedtert and the Medical College of WI

None. Declaration of conflict of interest

Surgical Options for Advanced Heart Failure

Novel Devices for End-Stage Heart Failure

Device Therapy for Heart Failure

Ventricular Assist Device: Are Early Interventions Superior? Hamang Patel, MD Section of Cardiomyopathy & Heart Transplantation

Sixth INTERMACS annual report: A 10,000-patient database

Multiple case reports of successful use, with only one case report of intra device thrombotic event

Please cite this article as: Ellie J Coromilas MD, Koji Takeda MD, PhD, Masahiko Ando MD,

Mechanical Ventilation & Cardiopulmonary Interactions: Clinical Application in Non- Conventional Circulations. Eric M. Graham, MD

Combination Evaluation of Preoperative Risk Indices Predicts Requirement of Biventricular Assist Device

Mechanical Circulatory Support (MCS): What Every Pharmacist Needs to Know!

Temporary right ventricular mechanical circulatory support for the management of right ventricular failure in critically ill patients

LEFT VENTRICULAR ASSIST DEVICES WHERE DOES PALLIATIVE MEDICINE FIT?

Predictors of Severe Right Ventricular Failure After Implantable Left Ventricular Assist Device Insertion: Analysis of 245 Patients

Complications of Left Ventricular Assist Device Chronic Support. Dr. Tal Hasin RMC, Beilinson, Petach-Tiqva, Israel

Evaluation of the Right Ventricle in Candidates for Right Ventricular Assist Device Implantation.

AllinaHealthSystem 1

Significance of Postoperative Acute Renal Failure After Continuous-Flow Left Ventricular Assist Device Implantation

Heart Transplant vs Left Ventricular Assist Device in Heart Transplant-Eligible Patients

Disclosures. No disclosures to report

LEFT VENTRICULAR ASSIST DEVICE COMPLICATIONS. Daniel Vargas, MD Section of Cardiothoracic Imaging University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus

Readmissions: an unavoidable nemesis

Left ventricular assist devices current state and perspectives

Management of Cardiogenic Shock. Dr Stephen Pettit, Consultant Cardiologist

Candidate Selection for Long Term VAD

Understanding the Pediatric Ventricular Assist Device

Transcription:

Derivation and Validation of a Novel Right-Sided Heart Failure Model After Implantation of Continuous Flow Left Ventricular Assist Devices: the EUROMACS-RHF Risk Score Osama I.I. Soliman, MD, PhD, FACC, FESC Assistant Professor of Cardiology, Thoraxcenter, Erasmus University Medical Center Director Structural Heart Imaging, Cardialysis Rotterdam, The Netherlands On behalf of the EUROMACS investigators Http://www.rhfriskscore.com

Background Left ventricular assist devices (LVADs) are increasingly used for patients with end-stage heart failure as a bridge-to-htx or destination therapy. Right-sided heart failure (RHF) is a frequent complication early after LVAD implantation and associated with high morbidity and mortality.

Objective To derive and validate a Novel Risk Score for early Right-sided Heart Failure (RHF) after LVAD implantation from The European Registry for Patients with Mechanical Circulatory Support (EUROMACS Registry).

3897 consecutive patients included in the EUROMACS database 171 patients younger than 18 years 2988 patients had mainstream LVAD comprised the final study cohort 97 patients had devices other than LVAD (SVAD, TAH) 641 patients had LVAD devices other than mainstream (ABS5000, Berlin heart)

Study endpoints Early (<30 days) severe postoperative RHF, defined as patients receiving short or long-term rightsided circulatory support (RVAD) and/or continuous inotropic support for 14 days, and/or nitric oxide ventilation for 48h. Secondary outcome was all-cause mortality and length of stay in the intensive care unit (ICU).

Mainstream LVAD (n=2988) Derivation cohort (n=2000) Validation cohort (n=988) Randomly selected, balanced in preoperative (clinical, laboratory, echocardiographic, hemodynamic) and operative characteristics

LVAD strategy Derivation Cohort Validation Cohort 21% 24% 24% 24% 17% 38% BTT BTC DT 17% 35% BTT BTC DT Others Others

Mainstream LVAD brands Derivation Cohort Validation Cohort 9% 7% 40% 51% HeartWare HeartMate II HeartMate 3 41% 52% HeartWare HeartMate II HeartMate 3

Primary Outcome (RHF components) Derivation cohort (n=2000) Right-Sided Heart Failure Components (n=433) 22% Inotropic 14 days 327 (76%) 78% RVAD need 141 (33%) RHF No RHF NO 48 hrs use 17 (4%)

The multivariable EUROMACS model for RHF Variables Odds ratio Lower 95%CI Upper 95%CI Coefficients RA to PCWP >0.54 2.075 1.412 3.112 0.730 2 Hemoglobin 10 g/dl 1.611 1.544 2.502 0.477 1 Multiple ( 3) IV inotropes 3.197 1.712 5.524 1.162 2.5 INTERMACS Class 1-3 2.903 1.946 4.893 1.066 2 Severe RV dysfunction 2.055 1.193 3.57 0.720 2 CPB time >100 min Total score 2.032 of 9.5 1.296 points 3.184 0.709 1 Score

EUROMACS-RHF RISK SCORE VALIDATION Validation cohort (n=988) Validation in independent population Validation against known predictors

EUROMACS-RHF RISK SCORE VALIDATION Derivation (n=2000) Mean ± SD = 2.7 ± 1.9 Median = 2 [IQR 2 to 3] P-value versus VC =0.32 Validation (n=988) Mean ± SD = 2.6 ± 2.0 Median = 2 [IQR 2 to 4] C-statistic 0.70 C-statistic 0.67

Performance of the EUROMACS-RHF score Derivation cohort (n=2000) Predictors for right-sided heart failure C (95% CI) p-value Risk scores EUROMACS-RHF risk score 0.70 (0.67 to 0.73) 1 - reference Postoperative (+CPB) EUROMACS-RHF risk score 0.71 (0.68 to 0.74) 0.41 Kormos et al. score 1 0.58 (0.54 to 0.61) <0.0001 CRITT score 2 0.63 (0.60 to 0.66) <0.0001 Hemodynamic parameters RA pressure, mmhg 0.60 (0.55 to 0.65) <0.0001 TPG, mmhg 0.55 (0.50 to 0.61) <0.0001 PVR, woods unit 0.56 (0.51 to 0.61) <0.0001 RVSWI, g/m2/beat 0.52 (0.47 to 0.56) <0.0001 Severe RV dysfunction 0.57 (0.52 to 0.61) <0.0001 1 Kormos et al. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2010;139:1316 1324. 2 Alturi et al. Ann Thorac Surg. 2013;96:857 863

Right-sided Heart Failure (%) 50% 45% Incidence of Right-Sided HF P-value <0.001 (for both cohorts) 43.1% 42.4% 40% 35% 30% 25% 25.7% 27.8% Derivation Cohort Validation Cohort 20% 15% 10% 11.0% 12.5% Linear (Derivation Cohort) 5% 0% 0 to 2 >2 to 4 >4 n=1007 n=513 n=608 n=291 n=385 n=184 EUROMACS-RHF Risk Score

Survival 19% 25%

ICU stay (days) 19 (IQR 9 to 31) 24 (IQR 14 to 38) 13 (IQR 6 to 25) P<0.001 P<0.001 7 (IQR 4 to 15) 6 (IQR 4 to 13)

14.0% 12.0% 11.6% 11.7% Causes of death No RHF 10.0% 8.0% P<0.001 6.8% P<0.001 RHF 6.0% 4.6% 4.0% 2.9% 3.0% P<0.001 P<0.001 2.5% 2.3% 2.0% 1.5% 1.2% 0.0% Multi-organ failure Sepsis Cerebro-vascular accident Bleeding Cardio-pulmonary failure

Take home message (1/2) the score We derived and validated a novel and simple risk score for RHF in 2988 adults undergoing LVAD implantation with mainstream devices in the EUROMACS Registry This model included: Need of 3 inotropic agents, INTERMACS class 1 to 3, Severe RV dysfunction, RA to PCWP ratio >0.54 Anemia (Hb 10 g/dl). CPB time >100 minutes for the postoperative risk calculator.

Take home message (1/2) clinical application This novel EUROMACS-RHF Risk Score is highly predictive, outperforming currently known risk scores and clinical predictors of early post-lvad RHF. This score may help to target future optimal strategies aiming at early and intensive RHF management for high risk subgroups of the LVAD patients. Future studies should determine whether early RVAD implantation and/or intensive RHF medication can improve survival and reduce ICU stay among LVAD candidates at high risk for RHF.

The paper will be simultaneously published in Circulation at the day of presentation Risk score calculator is available online Http://www.RHFriskscore.com

Acknowledgements EUROMACS Steering Committee EUROMACS Investigational sites and their principal investigators Contributing authors

Thank you!!!