Effect of Source and Level of Protein on Weight Gain of Rats

Similar documents
Chapter 9. Factorial ANOVA with Two Between-Group Factors 10/22/ Factorial ANOVA with Two Between-Group Factors

Hungry Mice. NP: Mice in this group ate as much as they pleased of a non-purified, standard diet for laboratory mice.

Professor Rose-Helleknat's PCR Data for Breast Cancer Study

Notes for laboratory session 2

Lab 7 (100 pts.): One-Way ANOVA Objectives: Analyze data via the One-Way ANOVA

NEUROBLASTOMA DATA -- TWO GROUPS -- QUANTITATIVE MEASURES 38 15:37 Saturday, January 25, 2003

STAT Factor Analysis in SAS

Linear Regression in SAS

HZAU MULTIVARIATE HOMEWORK #2 MULTIPLE AND STEPWISE LINEAR REGRESSION

2. Scientific question: Determine whether there is a difference between boys and girls with respect to the distance and its change over time.

ANOVA in SPSS (Practical)

The Association Design and a Continuous Phenotype

Chapter 6 Measures of Bivariate Association 1

Psych 5741/5751: Data Analysis University of Boulder Gary McClelland & Charles Judd. Exam #2, Spring 1992

Multiple Linear Regression Analysis

Stat Wk 9: Hypothesis Tests and Analysis

1. Objective: analyzing CD4 counts data using GEE marginal model and random effects model. Demonstrate the analysis using SAS and STATA.

Two-Way Independent Samples ANOVA with SPSS

Regression. Page 1. Variables Entered/Removed b Variables. Variables Removed. Enter. Method. Psycho_Dum

Use the above variables and any you might need to construct to specify the MODEL A/C comparisons you would use to ask the following questions.

ANOVA. Thomas Elliott. January 29, 2013

2008 PMR REPORT #ESOYSMI4 SECTION E: CEREAL, FORAGE CROPS, and OILSEEDS Insect Pests

Age (continuous) Gender (0=Male, 1=Female) SES (1=Low, 2=Medium, 3=High) Prior Victimization (0= Not Victimized, 1=Victimized)

Today: Binomial response variable with an explanatory variable on an ordinal (rank) scale.

General Example: Gas Mileage (Stat 5044 Schabenberger & J.P.Morgen)

MULTIPLE REGRESSION OF CPS DATA

Midterm Exam MMI 409 Spring 2009 Gordon Bleil

THE META-ANALYSIS (PROC MIXED) OF TWO PILOT CLINICAL STUDIES WITH A NOVEL ANTIDEPRESSANT

Using SAS to Conduct Pilot Studies: An Instructors Guide

MMI 409 Spring 2009 Final Examination Gordon Bleil. 1. Is there a difference in depression as a function of group and drug?

SPSS output for 420 midterm study

Answer to exercise: Growth of guinea pigs

BIOL 458 BIOMETRY Lab 7 Multi-Factor ANOVA

Cross-over trials. Martin Bland. Cross-over trials. Cross-over trials. Professor of Health Statistics University of York

Chapter 12: Introduction to Analysis of Variance

One-Way ANOVAs t-test two statistically significant Type I error alpha null hypothesis dependant variable Independent variable three levels;

Dr. Kelly Bradley Final Exam Summer {2 points} Name

Lab #7: Confidence Intervals-Hypothesis Testing (2)-T Test

SPSS output for 420 midterm study

Propensity Score Methods for Causal Inference with the PSMATCH Procedure

psy300 / Bizer / Factorial Analyses: 2 x 3 Between-Subjects Factorial Design

Modeling unobserved heterogeneity in Stata

PRINTABLE VERSION. Quiz 1. True or False: The amount of rainfall in your state last month is an example of continuous data.

Exam 2 PS 306, Fall 2005

Sociology 63993, Exam1 February 12, 2015 Richard Williams, University of Notre Dame,

Chapter 13: Introduction to Analysis of Variance

Namık Zengin, Research assistant, Yildiz Technical University, Department of Mechatronics Engineering, Republic of Turkey,

Effects of Nutrients on Shrimp Growth

isc ove ring i Statistics sing SPSS

Answer Key to Problem Set #1

GPA vs. Hours of Sleep: A Simple Linear Regression Jacob Ushkurnis 12/16/2016

Exercise Verify that the term on the left of the equation showing the decomposition of "total" deviation in a two-factor experiment.

Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) Program Transcript

MODEL I: DRINK REGRESSED ON GPA & MALE, WITHOUT CENTERING

Subescala D CULTURA ORGANIZACIONAL. Factor Analysis

This tutorial presentation is prepared by. Mohammad Ehsanul Karim

Exam 2 PS 306, Spring 2004

HS Exam 1 -- March 9, 2006

Regression Including the Interaction Between Quantitative Variables

Multiple Regression Analysis

Exam 3 PS 306, Spring 2005

Regression models, R solution day7

Chapter 5. Describing numerical data

4. STATA output of the analysis

Subescala B Compromisso com a organização escolar. Factor Analysis

Exam 3 PS 217, Spring 2011

Steps in Inferential Analyses. Inferential Statistics. t-test

A Comparison of Linear Mixed Models to Generalized Linear Mixed Models: A Look at the Benefits of Physical Rehabilitation in Cardiopulmonary Patients

ATTACH YOUR SAS CODE WITH YOUR ANSWERS.

8/28/2017. If the experiment is successful, then the model will explain more variance than it can t SS M will be greater than SS R

Final Exam PS 217, Fall 2010

Propensity score analysis with the latest SAS/STAT procedures PSMATCH and CAUSALTRT

Applications. DSC 410/510 Multivariate Statistical Methods. Discriminating Two Groups. What is Discriminant Analysis

Explore. sexcntry Sex according to country. [DataSet1] D:\NORA\NORA Main File.sav

1. Below is the output of a 2 (gender) x 3(music type) completely between subjects factorial ANOVA on stress ratings

Introduction to regression

Bangor University Laboratory Exercise 1, June 2008

ABSTRACT THE INDEPENDENT MEANS T-TEST AND ALTERNATIVES SESUG Paper PO-10

Using Direct Standardization SAS Macro for a Valid Comparison in Observational Studies

Analysis of single gene effects 1. Quantitative analysis of single gene effects. Gregory Carey, Barbara J. Bowers, Jeanne M.

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY DATA AND PROBLEM

THE EFFECTS OF USING THREE KINDS OF FEEDING METHODS ON CHICKS' GROWTH

Overview of Lecture. Survey Methods & Design in Psychology. Correlational statistics vs tests of differences between groups

Name: emergency please discuss this with the exam proctor. 6. Vanderbilt s academic honor code applies.

Simple Linear Regression

Tutorial 3: MANOVA. Pekka Malo 30E00500 Quantitative Empirical Research Spring 2016

Repeated Measures ANOVA and Mixed Model ANOVA. Comparing more than two measurements of the same or matched participants

Applied Medical. Statistics Using SAS. Geoff Der. Brian S. Everitt. CRC Press. Taylor Si Francis Croup. Taylor & Francis Croup, an informa business

Simple Sensitivity Analyses for Matched Samples Thomas E. Love, Ph.D. ASA Course Atlanta Georgia

Unit 1 Exploring and Understanding Data

Standard Methods for Analysis and Reporting of VAS or NRS Derived Pain Relief Response Scores

Understandable Statistics

APÊNDICE 6. Análise fatorial e análise de consistência interna

Normal Q Q. Residuals vs Fitted. Standardized residuals. Theoretical Quantiles. Fitted values. Scale Location 26. Residuals vs Leverage

Small Sample Bayesian Factor Analysis. PhUSE 2014 Paper SP03 Dirk Heerwegh

ID# Exam 1 PS306, Spring 2005

Midterm STAT-UB.0003 Regression and Forecasting Models. I will not lie, cheat or steal to gain an academic advantage, or tolerate those who do.

Math Section MW 1-2:30pm SR 117. Bekki George 206 PGH

C.3 Repeated Measures ANOVA

Table S1. Trait summary for Northern Leaf Blight resistance in the maize nested association mapping (NAM) population and individual NAM families

Transcription:

Effect of Source and Level of Protein on of Rats 1 * two factor analysis of variance with interaction; 2 option ls=120 ps=75 nocenter nodate; 3 4 title Effect of Source of Protein and Level of Protein on Weight 5 Gains in Rats ; 6 * Weight gain is the response variable. The factors are 7 source of protein (cereal, beef and pork) and level of protein 8 (high, low).; 9 * There are ten observations of each treatment combination.; 10 11 12 data PARTS; array S S1-S10; input TREAT $ SOURCE $ LEVEL $ S1-S10; * input each sample by treatment; 13 do over S; GAIN=S; output; end; * output observations; 14 drop S1-S10; 15 16 label GAIN= TREAT= Source and Level of Protein Combination 17 18 SOURCE= Source of Protein LEVEL= Level of Protein ; 19 20 21 cards; BH 73 102 118 104 81 107 100 87 117 111 22 BL 90 76 90 64 86 51 72 90 95 78 23 24 PH PL 94 49 79 82 96 73 98 102 102 108 86 81 97 106 91 120 105 70 61 82 25 CH 98 74 56 111 95 88 82 77 86 92 26 CL 107 95 97 80 98 74 74 67 89 58 27 28 29 proc print; var SOURCE LEVEL GAIN; PROC SORT; BY TREAT; 30 PROC UNIVARIATE DEF=5 PLOT;BY TREAT; * BOXPLOTS FOR ALL SAMPLES; 31 VAR GAIN; 32 33 34 proc glm; class SOURCE LEVEL; MODEL GAIN=SOURCELEVEL/SS1 SS2 SS3 SS4; * SOURCE and LEVEL are factors; 35 OUTPUT OUT=NEW P=MEANS R=RESID; * OUTPUT SAMPLE MEANS AND RESIDUals; 36 MEANS SOURCELEVEL; 37 label MEANS= Sample Means 38 39 RESID= Residuals from Model With Interaction ; proc glm; class TREAT; model GAIN=TREAT/ss1; 40 MEANS TREAT/TUKEY; *TUKEY S TEST ON ALL MEANS; 41 estimate Level of Protein TREAT 1-1 1-1 1-1; 42 contrast Level of Protein TREAT 1-1 1-1 1-1; 43 44 estimate Animal vs. Vegetable TREAT 1 1-2 -2 1 1; 45 contrast Animal vs. Vegetable TREAT 1 1-2 -2 1 1; 46 47 estimate Interaction of Level with Combined Sources 48 TREAT.5 -.5-1 1.5 -.5; 49 contrast Interaction of Level with Combined Sources 50 TREAT.5 -.5-1 1.5 -.5 ;

51 52 estimate vs. TREAT 1 1 0 0-1 -1; 53 contrast vs. TREAT 1 1 0 0-1 -1; 54 55 estimate Interaction of Level vs. Meat TREAT 1-1 0 0-1 1; 56 contrast Interaction of Level vs. Meat TREAT 1-1 0 0-1 1; 57 58 proc plot; plot MEANS*SOURCE=LEVEL; * interaction plot; 59 proc plot; plot RESID*MEANS; * check residuals; Effect of Source of Protein and Level of Protein on s in Rats OBS SOURCE LEVEL GAIN OBS SOURCE LEVEL GAIN 1 73 31 49 2 3 102 118 32 33 82 73 4 104 34 86 5 6 81 107 35 36 81 97 7 100 37 106 8 87 38 70 9 117 39 61 10 11 111 90 40 41 82 98 12 76 42 74 13 14 90 64 43 44 56 111 15 16 86 51 45 46 95 88 17 72 47 82 18 19 90 95 48 49 77 86 20 78 50 92 21 94 51 107 22 79 52 95 23 96 53 97 24 98 54 80 25 102 55 98 26 102 56 74 27 108 57 74 28 91 58 67 29 120 59 89 30 105 60 58 2

Effect of Source of Protein and Level of Protein on s in Rats 8 Univariate Procedure Schematic Plots Variable=GAIN 120 + 115 + +-----+ 110 + 105 + +-----+ *-----* 100 + + *--+--* +-----+ 95 + +-----+ +-----+ 90 + +-----+ +-----+ *-----* + +-----+ 85 + *-----* + *-----* *-----* 80 + + + +-----+ 75 + +-----+ +-----+ 70 + +-----+ 65 + 60 + 55 + 50 + 45 + ------------+-----------+-----------+-----------+-----------+-----------+----------- TREAT BH BL CH CL PH PL 3

Effect of Source of Protein and Level of Protein on s in Rats 9 Class Level Information Class Levels Values SOURCE 3 LEVEL 2 Number of observations in data set = 60 Dependent Variable: GAIN Source DF Sum of Squares Mean Square F Value Pr > F Model 5 4612.93333333 922.58666667 4.30 0.0023 Error 54 11586.00000000 214.55555556 Corrected Total 59 16198.93333333 R-Square C.V. Root MSE GAIN Mean 0.284768 16.67039 14.64771503 87.86666667 Source DF Type I SS Mean Square F Value Pr > F Source DF Type II SS Mean Square F Value Pr > F Source DF Type III SS Mean Square F Value Pr > F Source DF Type IV SS Mean Square F Value Pr > F Level of -------------GAIN------------ SOURCE N Mean SD 20 89.6000000 17.7123210 20 84.9000000 14.9943849 20 89.1000000 17.3202042 Level of -------------GAIN------------ LEVEL N Mean SD 30 95.1333333 14.9083021 30 80.6000000 15.0690365 Level of Level of -------------GAIN------------ SOURCE LEVEL N Mean SD 10 100.0000000 15.1364167 10 79.2000000 13.8868443 10 85.9000000 15.0218360 10 83.9000000 15.7088086 10 99.5000000 10.9163486 10 78.7000000 16.5465673 4

Effect of Source of Protein and Level of Protein on s in Rats 12 Class Level Information Class Levels Values TREAT 6 BH BL CH CL PH PL Number of observations in data set = 60 Dependent Variable: GAIN Source DF Sum of Squares Mean Square F Value Pr > F Model 5 4612.93333333 922.58666667 4.30 0.0023 Error 54 11586.00000000 214.55555556 Corrected Total 59 16198.93333333 R-Square C.V. Root MSE GAIN Mean 0.284768 16.67039 14.64771503 87.86666667 Source DF Type I SS Mean Square F Value Pr > F TREAT 5 4612.93333333 922.58666667 4.30 0.0023 Tukey s Studentized Range (HSD) Test for variable: GAIN NOTE: This test controls the type I experimentwise error rate, but generally has a higher type II error rate than REGWQ. Alpha= 0.05 df= 54 MSE= 214.5556 Critical Value of Studentized Range= 4.178 Minimum Significant Difference= 19.354 Means with the same letter are not significantly different. Tukey Grouping Mean N TREAT A 100.000 10 BH A A 99.500 10 PH A B A 85.900 10 CH B A B A 83.900 10 CL B B 79.200 10 BL B B 78.700 10 PL Dependent Variable: GAIN Contrast DF Contrast SS Mean Square F Value Pr > F Level of Protein 1 3168.26666667 3168.26666667 14.77 0.0003 Animal vs. Vegetable 1 264.03333333 264.03333333 1.23 0.2722 Interaction of Level 1 1178.13333333 1178.13333333 5.49 0.0228 vs. 1 2.50000000 2.50000000 0.01 0.9144 Interaction of Level 1 0.00000000 0.00000000 0.00 1.0000 T for H0: Pr > T Std Error of Parameter Estimate Parameter=0 Estimate Level of Protein 43.6000000 3.84 0.0003 11.3460713 Animal vs. Vegetable 17.8000000 1.11 0.2722 16.0457679 Interaction of Level 18.8000000 2.34 0.0228 8.0228839 vs. 1.0000000 0.11 0.9144 9.2640284 Interaction of Level -0.0000000-0.00 1.0000 9.2640284 5

Effect of Source of Protein and Level of Protein on s in Rats 16 Plot of MEANS*SOURCE. Symbol is value of LEVEL. 100 + H H 98 + 96 + 94 + 92 + S a m p l 90 + e M e a 88 + n s 86 + H 84 + L 82 + 80 + L L 78 + ---+----------------------------+----------------------------+-- Source of Protein NOTE: 54 obs hidden. 6

Effect of Source of Protein and Level of Protein on s in Rats 17 Plot of RESID*MEANS. Legend: A = 1 obs, B = 2 obs, etc. 30 + A 25 + A A A 20 + R e A A s A i A d 15 + u A a A l A s C A A 10 + f A A r o A A A m A A 5 + A M A o B B d A A A e l 0 + A A A A W i A A t A A h -5 + A A I A n A t A A e -10 + B r a A c A t i -15 + A o n A A A -20 + A -25 + A A A -30 + A A --+---------+---------+---------+---------+---------+---------+---------+---------+---------+---------+---------+- 78 80 82 84 86 88 90 92 94 96 98 100 Sample Means 7