LupusPRO (Lupus Patient Reported Outcome Tool) v1.7

Similar documents
Validation of the Russian version of the Quality of Life-Rheumatoid Arthritis Scale (QOL-RA Scale)

Body image in lupus: Is it disease activity, physical function, depression, pain, fatigue, sleep, fibromyalgia or stress?

The Chinese University of Hong Kong The Nethersole School of Nursing. CADENZA Training Programme

Body Image in Lupus? Effects of any war 11/28/2018. What is Systemic Lupus Erythematosus (SLE)

Patient Reported Quality of Life in an Early Psoriatic Arthritis Cohort

Validation of the LupusPRO in Chinese Patients From Hong Kong With Systemic Lupus Erythematosus

Session 6: Choosing and using HRQoL measures vs Multi-Attribute Utility Instruments QLU-C10D and EQ-5D as examples

Validity and reliability of the Lupus QoL index in Turkish systemic lupus erythematosus patients

Title of measure: Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Brain (FACT-Br)

An evaluation of quality of life in ambulatory patients with systemic lupus erythematosus attending rheumatology clinic in Kenyatta National Hospital

Alexandra Savova, Guenka Petrova. Medical University Sofia Faculty of Pharmacy

National Cancer Institute

CHAPTER - III METHODOLOGY

10/28/2013. Brief discussion of Body Image among Women with Lupus. Adapting a Body Image Intervention. Details of the Intervention

Problem Situation Form for Parents

ASSESSMENT OF QOL IN PATIENTS WITH PRADER WILLY SYNDROME

Patient Follow-up Form - Version 1.1

continued TABLE E-1 Outlines of the HRQOL Scoring Systems

Epilepsy, co-morbidities and Quality of Life. Professor Gus A Baker PhD FBPS

Supplementary Appendix

These questions are about the physical problems which may have occurred as a result of your stroke. Quite a bit of strength

SUPPLEMENT MATERIALS. Appendix A: Cleveland Global Quality of Life (CGQL) [0 being the WORST and 10 being the BEST]

Journal of Patient- Reported Outcomes. Mary Kaye Willian 1, Geert D Haens 2, Aaron Yarlas 3* and Ashish V. Joshi 1

Elbow and Forearm Pain Form

Concept of Measurement: RA Defining Decrements in Physical Function

THE GENERAL WELL-BEING SCHEDULE SEX: M: [ ] F: [ ] AGE: 1. How have you been feeling in general during the past month?

The HeartQol questionnaire. Reliability, validity and responsiveness?

NAME OF PATIENT: STREET ADDRESS: CITY: STATE: ZIP: SEX: Male Female AGE: BIRTHDATE: MARITAL STATUS: PATIENT EMPLOYED BY: BUSINESS ADDRESS:

Good. Poor [ ] [ ] Yes, at all [ A ] Moderate activities, such as moving a table, pushing a vacuum cleaner, bowling, or playing golf [ ] [ ]

Quality of Life Questionnaire for a Patient with an. Ostomy (QOL-O) Grant, M., Ferrell, B. R., Dean, G., Uman, G., Chu, D., & Krouse, R.

The North West Adelaide Health Study

Freire EAM *,**,***, Bruscato A ***,****, Leite DRC *, Sousa TTS *, Ciconelli RM **,*** Abstract. Introduction

HCBS Autism Waiver Individualized Behavioral Program/Plan of Care Section I - Demographics

CITY OF HOPE NATIONAL MEDICAL CENTER QUALITY OF LIFE QUESTIONNAIRE FOR PATIENTS WITH AN OSTOMY

The Prognos+c Value of Pre- Diagnosis Health- Related Quality of Life on Survival: A Prospec+ve Cohort Study of Older Americans with Lung Cancer

PATIENT SURVEY FOR ADMINISTRATIVE USE ONLY. TO BE COMPLETED BY STUDY COORDINATOR.

Impact of Cancer Scale Tool

Patient Assessment Quality of Life

Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder

Sleep Health Center. You have been scheduled for an Insomnia Treatment Program consultation to further discuss your

Comparative study of health status in working men and women using Standard Form -36 questionnaire.

Which outcome measures in SLE clinical trials best reflect medical judgment?

Voice & Swallow Clinics

Youth Services Survey for Youth / Families Report - Spring 2014 FSA Deaf Community Counseling Services. Global Satisfaction 100.0%

Health Related Quality of Life before, during and after pregnancy in Norwegian women with Rheumatoid Arthritis and Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis.

4. How often do you use all of your energy to accomplish only this activity? [yellow card]

Interpretation Clinical significance: what does it mean?

Quality of life in patients with HCV / HIV co-infection

Patient experience in systemic lupus erythematosus: development of novel patient-reported symptom and patient-reported impact measures

HEALTH STATUS QUESTIONNAIRE 2.0

The Patient-Rated Elbow Evaluation (PREE) User Manual. June 2010

MER Baseline Enrollment Questionnaire. To be completed by Participant at time of Enrollment

A methodological review of the Short Form Health Survey 36 (SF-36) and its derivatives among breast cancer survivors

S. Rinaldi, A. Doria, F. Salaffi 2, M. Ermani 1, L. Iaccarino, A. Ghirardello, S. Zampieri, P. Sarzi-Puttini 3, P. F. Gambari and G.

Thriving in College: The Role of Spirituality. Laurie A. Schreiner, Ph.D. Azusa Pacific University

Patient Reported Outcomes

Buy full version here - for $7.00

EMOTIONAL SUPPORT ANIMAL (ESA) PSYCHOLOGICAL EVALUATION. Important Information

WHO Quality of Life. health other than the cause of a disease or the side effects that come along with it. These other

Research Article Body Image Disturbances Have Impact on the Sexual Problems in Chinese Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Patients

Please return your completed questionnaire thank you.

Long-term impact of belimumab on health-related quality of life and fatigue in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus: 6 years of treatment

PROMIS-29 V2.0 Physical and Mental Health Summary Scores. Ron D. Hays. Karen L. Spritzer, Ben Schalet, Dave Cella. September 27, 2017, 3:30-4:00pm

PATIENT REPORTED OUTCOMES

National Survey of Young Adults on HIV/AIDS

Clinical Commissioning Policy Statement: Rituximab For Systemic Lupus Erythematosus (SLE) December Reference : NHSCB/A3C/1b

LEO (Lymphoma Epidemiology & Outcomes) Baseline Enrollment Questionnaire. To be completed by Participant at time of Enrollment

ANXIETY A brief guide to the PROMIS Anxiety instruments:

EMOTIONAL SUPPORT ANIMAL (ESA) PSYCHOLOGICAL EVALUATION PART I: PERSONAL INFORMATION STREET ADDRESS CITY/STATE

Psychological Sleep Services Sleep Assessment

Patient Reported Outcomes (PROs) in IBD: What Are They and What Does the Clinician Need to Know?

Welcome to NHS Highland Pain Management Service

Health Related Quality of Life: Cancer cachexia. Professor Graeme D. Smith Editor Journal of Clinical Nursing CMU,Taiwan August 2017

Child Health Questionnaire (CHQ)

New approaches to exercise Thursday Sep 4, 3 pm

After Total Hip Arthroplasty Comparison of a Traditional Disease-specific and a Quality-of-life Measurement of Outcome

AIMS2 USER'S GUIDE BOSTON UNIVERSITY ARTHRITIS CENTER

Reducing Multiple Risk Behaviors and Enhancing Multiple Domains of Well-Being

Introducing the OWLQOL and WRSM Instruments

Consumer Perception Survey (Formerly Known as POQI)

Measures of Fatigue MEASURES OF PATHOLOGY AND SYMPTOMS SARAH HEWLETT, EMMA DURES, AND CELIA ALMEIDA INTRODUCTION

London Pathway Evaluation

Eau Claire Tower Fitness Centre MEMBERSHIP APPLICATION

Managing your pain

Patient Details Hidden. Clinical Enrollment. Quality of Life. EuroQOL (EQ-5D) Enroll Patient. Not Started. Not Started

Jumpstart, Fitness Assessment, & Body Composition

For more information: Quality of Life. World Health Organization Definition of Health

London Pathway Evaluation

What is Quality of Life like for autistic people

SMOKING HISTORY INSTRUCTIONS

CHECK LIST FORM-MONTH 42 (Please note Month 42 is from enrolment not randomisation)

Quality of Life Over Time in Patients With Systemic Lupus Erythematosus

PatientsLikeMe IOM Survey. Paul Wicks, PhD.

Discussion and Personal Reactions:

COPING WITH POTS RESULTS FROM SURVEY. Georgina Hardy

Please complete ALL 6 pages of the form in blue/black ink. Patient Acct # Provider # BMI # Height Weight

The impact of depression and anxiety on quality of life in Chinese cancer patientfamily caregiver dyads, a cross-sectional study

Quality of Life During Androgen Deprivation Therapy for Prostate Cancer: A Longitudinal, Controlled Comparison

Brewster Chiropractic Michael B. Singleton DC, MS, CNS, CSCS

KAISER PERMANENTE SPINE

Transcription:

LupusPRO (Lupus Patient Reported Outcome Tool) v1.7 Authors: Meenakshi Jolly and Simon Pickard For information on, or permission to use tool, please contact: Meenakshi Jolly, MD Assistant Professor of Medicine Rheumatology, Department of Medicine Rush University Medical Center 1611 W Harrison Street, Suite 510 Chicago, Il 60612 Phone: 312.563.2800 Fax: 312.563.2075 Meenakshi_Jolly@rush.edu Copyright: Rush University and University of Illinois at Chicago Conditions of use: With Author s written Permission Free for academic/non- profit research, with signature of an agreement With fees for commercial/pharmaceutical companies, with signature of an agreement: For rates, contact Matw Raymond at 312.563.2780 or matw_j_raymond@rush.edu

LupusPRO is a disease targeted patient reported outcome tool for patients with systemic lupus erymatosus (SLE). It was developed from ethnically diverse US patients with SLE (1-3). It has been validated for use in US. It has 43 items of which 30 items are for health related quality of life. It has two constructs Health Related Quality of Life and Non-health related quality of life. The HRQOL domains include Lupus Symptoms Lupus Medications Cognition, Procreation Physical health Emotional Health Pain & Vitality Body Image N-HRQOL domains include Desires & Goals Coping Social Support Satisfaction with medical Care Time to completion: 7-10 minutes Translations: Available in Spanish and French

LupusPRO (v 1.7) This questionnaire asks for your views about effect of lupus or its treatment on your health, quality of life, and medical care you receive related to your lupus. Answer each question by placing a cross mark (x) in response box that best describes you. If you are unsure about how to answer a question, please answer as best you can. There is no right or wrong answer. Please select only one response to each question. You may choose option for a question only if a box is provided in that column for that particular question. A. In past 4 weeks, how often did you experience following due to your lupus? 1. Loss of hair A little of Some of Most of skin rashes side effects. medications being received for lupus. affect ability to have a baby. pregnancy. 2. New or flare of previous lupus-related 3. Lupus flare 4. Poor memory 5. Lack of concentration 6. Lupus medication(s) related borsome 7. Concern about number of 8. Concern that lupus medication(s) will 9. Worry about ability to prevent unplanned B. How often were you limited in performing following daily activities because of your physical health due to your lupus over past 4 weeks? 10. Taking care of your personal needs Some of Most of (dress, comb hair, toilet, eat, ba) 11. Getting in and out of a bed or chair depend on me (family, pet). 12. Fulfilling family responsibilities 13. Taking care of those who directly

C. How often did you feel following due to your lupus during past 4 weeks? 14. I felt I was a burden to family or friends due to my inability to perform daily activities. 15. I woke up feeling worn out Some of Most of due to bodily pain 16. I felt pain and aching in my body 17. I was unable to do my usual activities 18. I was unable to perform usual activities for long periods of (e.g. around home or at work) because of pain or fatigue 19. I was limited in kinds of tasks or activities I could perform because of pain or fatigue D. During past 4 weeks, how often did you feel because of your lupus that you were: 20. Worried about lupus impact on my Some of Most of future may lead to more health problems 21. Worried about losing income 22. Anxious 23. Depressed 24. Concerned that lupus (or its treatment) 25. Concerned that lupus related health problems will last a long E. During past 4 weeks, how often did you feel following due to lupus? 26. I disliked my appearance Some of Most of appearance 27. I thought less of myself 28. I lacked control over my appearance 29. I was self conscious about my 30. I was embarrassed about how ors perceived me

F. During past 4 weeks, how often did lupus interfere with your: 31. Ability to plan activities and schedule Some of Most of events 32. Overall life satisfaction 33. Enjoyment of life 34. Fulfillment of career goals G. During past 4 weeks, how often would you say in regards to your lupus? Some of Most of H. During past 3 months, how often did you feel following about medical care for lupus you received? religious or spiritual beliefs. 35. I received support from my friends. 36. I received support from my family. 37. I focused on making my situation better. 38. I learned to live with my lupus. 39. I received comfort/strength from my Some of Most of 40. My doctor was accessible when I had a question regarding my lupus. 41. My doctor understood impact of lupus on my life. 42. My doctor provided me with information I need to understand my lupus. 43. My doctor discussed/ monitored side effects of lupus medicine/s. Thank you for completing this questionnaire. Please check to make sure all questions have been answered. 2007, Rush University Medical Center and Board of Trustees of University of Illinois at Chicago. All rights reserved.031610

Table 1: Summary Scores and Reliability of LupusPRO domains Domain Mean (SD, Range) Internal Consistency Reliability Test Retest Reliability Lupus Symptoms 74.1 (24.1, 0-100) 0.72 0.79 Cognition 73.1 (27.8, 0-100) 0.92 0.77 Lupus Medication 77.9 (27.2, 0-100) 0.68 0.74 Physical Health 78.1 (22.9, 0-100) 0.85 0.78 Pain-Vitality 60.4 (28.4, 0-100) 0.92 0.84 Emotional Health 60.4 (28.6, 0-100) 0.92 0.87 Procreation 90.9 (21.3, 0-100) 0.72 0.57 Body Image 72.8 (29.0,0-100) 0.94 0.92 General Health 68.6 (24.9, 0-100) NA 0.91 Desires/Goals 68.1 (29.2,0-100) 0.91 0.63 Coping 69.7 (27.2,0-100) 0.76 0.77 Social support 70.6 (30.9, 0-100) 0.81 0.65 Satisfaction with care 76.5 (30.2,0-100) 0.92 0.55

Table 2. Validity of LupusPRO against SF36, disease activity and disease damage. *n=68 for BILAG Disease Activity Domain Lupus Symptoms SF36 (r, p value) n=236 Disease Damage (r, p value) n=68 (r, p value) n=184* PGA (-0.37, 0.001) SLEDAI ( -0.23, 0.002) LFA (-0.44, 0.001) General BILAG (-0.31,0.01), Muco-cutaneous BILAG (-0.47,0.001) Musculo-skeletal BILAG (-0.13,0.29) Total BILAG (-0.43,0.001) Cognition LFA (-0.19, 0.04) -0.23, 0.06 SLEDAI (-0.17,0.02) Lupus Medication -0.37, 0.001 LFA (-0.15, 0.08) PGA (-0.14, 0.05) PF (0.62, 0.001) Physical Health LFA (-0.25, 0.004) RP (0.57, 0.001) Total BILAG (-0.23,0.05) PGA (-0.14, 0.06) BP (0.75, 0.001) LFA (-0.21, 0.02) Pain-Vitality VT (0.74,0.001) Musculo-skeletal BILAG (-0.26,0.03) Total BILAG (-0.27,0.02) PGA (-0.19, 0.01) SLEDAI (-0.14, 0.05) LFA (-0.20, 0.02) MH (0.64,0.001) Emotional Health Muco-cutaneous BILAG (-0.25,0.04) RE (0.52, 0.001) Musculo-skeletal BILAG (-0.21,0.09) Vasculitis BILAG (-0.31, 0.01) Total BILAG (-0.34,0.01) PGA (-0.20, 0.007) Procreation -0.24,0.05 SLEDAI (-0.18, 0.01) PGA (-0.20, 0.005) SLEDAI (-0.16, 0.03) LFA (-0.23, 0.01) Body Image -0.28,0.03 Muco-cutaneous BILAG (-0.25, 0.04) Vasculitis BILAG (-0.26,0.04) Total BILAG (-0.24,0.05) LFA (-0.21, 0.03) General Health GH (0.58, 0.001) Musculo-skeletal BILAG (-0.26,0.03) Vasculitis BILAG (-0.24, 0.04) PGA (-0.18, 0.01) SLEDAI (-0.22, 0.003) LFA (-0.18, 0.04) Desires/Goals General BILAG (-0.30,0.01) Muco-cutaneous BILAG (-0.33, 0.01) Musculo-skeletal BILAG (-0.35,0.001) Total BILAG (-0.50,0.001) Coping Vasculitis BILAG (-0.25, 0.04) Social support SS (0.20, 0.002) Vasculitis BILAG (-0.23, 0.06) -0.26, 0.04 PGA (0.18, 0.01) Satisfaction with care Musculo-skeletal BILAG (-0.23,0.06) Cardio-Pulmonary BILAG (-0.35, 0.001) PGA (-0.30, 0.001) SLEDAI (-0.32, 0.001) PCS (0.54, 0.001) LFA (-0.29, 0.002) HRQOL MCS (0.64, 0.001) -0.32,0.01 Muco-cutaneous BILAG (-0.23, 0.06) SF6D (0.68, 0.001) Musculo-skeletal BILAG (-0.22,0.08) Vasculitis BILAG (-0.21, 0.09) PCS (0.30, 0.001) Non-HRQOL MCS (0.27, 0.001) Vasculitis BILAG (-0.28, 0.02) SF6D (0.36, 0.001)

Table 3. Criterion validity of LupusPRO Lupus Symptoms PGA mean (SD) (n=182) 0 84.3 (19.4) >0-1 69.6 (23.6) >1 62.1 (28.2) (p=0.001) Cognition 0 76.7 (25.5) >0-1 75.7 (27.9) Lupus Medication >1 66.7 (31.4) (p=0.18) 0 80.4 (26.4) >0-1 81.6 (25.8) >1 68.2 (32.8) (p=0.04) Physical Health 0 85.0 (21.5) >0-1 75.8 (24.2) >1 75.5 (22.7) (p=0.02) Pain-Vitality 0 66.3 (28.9) >0-1 61.2 (27.6) Emotional Health >1 54.8 (31.9) (p=0.14) 0 69.0 (28.6) >0-1 61.4 (29.8) >1 51.1 (31.7) (p=0.01) Procreation 0 93.1 (18.1) >0-1 89.3 (24.8) >1 79.8 (30.5) (p=0.02) Body Image 0 82.9 (23.4) >0-1 74.7 (28.9) >1 66.9 (32.7) (p=0.01) General Health 0 77.5 (18.8) >0-1 76.7 (21.4) >1 63.0 (28.5) (p=0.07) Desires/Goals 0 76.9 (27.4) >0-1 70.1 (27.7) >1 58.7 (34.7) (p=0.008) Coping 0 74.9 (27.9) >0-1 70.0 (26.4) >1 73.6 (32.2) (p=0.56) Social support 0 74.6 (32.5) >0-1 73.9 (29.7) Satisfaction with care >1 80.3 (31.3) (p=0.58) 0 79.7 (29.2) >0-1 78.1 (32.0) >1 92.1 (12.7) (p=0.02) LFA Flare mean (SD) (n=128) Yes 80.5 (21.6) No 51.6 (26.6) (p=0.001) Yes 72.5 (27.6) No 59.3 (27.3) (p=0.03) Yes 80.7 (26.4) No 70 (31.8) (p=0. 0.08) Yes 79.7 (24.6) No 63.8 (22.3) (p=0.003) Yes 60.4 (29.5) No 45 (24.9) (p=0. 01) Yes 65.4 (29.5) No 50.0 (31.3) (p=0. 02) Yes 93.8 (19.5) No 90.0 (27.9) (p=0.42) Yes 79.2 (26.3) No 63.2 (30.5) (p=0. 009) Yes 63.4 (30.4) No 49.5 (26.9) (p=0. 03) Yes 73.3 (28.1) No 60.0 (30.1) (p=0. 0.03) Yes 73.0 (26.4) No 69.7 (31.3) (p=0. 59) Yes 72.5 (32.4) No 67.0 (32.0) (p=0.45) Yes 76.4 (32.0) No 78.0 (28.7) (p=0.82)

Scoring for LupusPRO v1.7 Items Construct Domain Description Reverse Coding 1-3 HRQOL Lupus Symptoms Lupus Symptoms Yes 4-5 HRQOL Cognition Cognition Yes 6-7 HRQOL Lupus Medications Lupus Medications Yes 8-9 HRQOL Procreation Procreation Yes 10-14 HRQOL Physical Health Physical Function, Role Physical Yes 15-19 HRQOL Pain Vitality Pain Vitality Yes 20-25 HRQOL Emotional Health Emotional function, Role Emotional Yes 26-30 HRQOL Body Image Body Image Yes 31-34 N-HRQOL Desires-Goals Desires, Goals, Plans Yes 35-36 N-HRQOL Social support Support system No 37-39 N-HRQOL Coping Coping No 40-43 N-HRQOL Satisfaction with care Satisfaction with Lupus Care No The LupusPRO has 5 point Likert response format, where 0= /not applicable, 1= A little of, 2= Some of, 3=Most of, 4=, 5= applicable (recode as 0 for scoring). Reverse scoring for some items is required (as above). There are 12 observed domains. Item scores are totaled for each domain item and mean domain score is obtained by dividing total score by number of items in that domain. The mean raw domain score is transformed to scores ranging from 0 (worst QOL) to 100 (best QOL) by dividing by 4 ( number of Likert responses {5 responses} minus 1) and n multiplying by 100, as below: (Mean raw domain score/4) x 100= Transformed score for domain. Transformed domain scores are obtainable when at least 50% of items are answered. Total HRQOL and N-HRQOL scores are obtained by averaging transformed domain scores within each construct. Reference List (1) Jolly M, Pickard AS, Wilke C, Lin HW, Khandelwal S, Rodby R et al. Development and Validation of a US Lupus Specific Patient Reported Outcome Measure. Arthritis & Rheum. 56[9s], S113. 2007. (2) Jolly M, Pickard AS, Fogg L, Wilke C, Lin H, Mikolaitis R et al. US Patient Derived Lupus-Specific Patient Reported Outcome Measure (Lupus-PRO ): Validity and Reliability. Arthritis & Rheumatism 2008; 58(9s):S805. (3) Cervera J, Cooray D, Jolly M, Katsaros EP, Moldovan I, Shinada S et al. Predictors of Patient Reported Health Outcomes in A New Lupus Cohort in Sourn California. Arthritis & Rheum 60[10s], S515. 2010.

Table 1: Summary Scores and Reliability of LupusPRO domains Domain Mean (SD, Range) Internal Consistency Reliability Test Retest Reliability Lupus Symptoms 74.1 (24.1, 0-100) 0.72 0.79 Cognition 73.1 (27.8, 0-100) 0.92 0.77 Lupus Medication 77.9 (27.2, 0-100) 0.68 0.74 Physical Health 78.1 (22.9, 0-100) 0.85 0.78 Pain-Vitality 60.4 (28.4, 0-100) 0.92 0.84 Emotional Health 60.4 (28.6, 0-100) 0.92 0.87 Procreation 90.9 (21.3, 0-100) 0.72 0.57 Body Image 72.8 (29.0,0-100) 0.94 0.92 General Health 68.6 (24.9, 0-100) NA 0.91 Desires/Goals 68.1 (29.2,0-100) 0.91 0.63 Coping 69.7 (27.2,0-100) 0.76 0.77 Social support 70.6 (30.9, 0-100) 0.81 0.65 Satisfaction with care 76.5 (30.2,0-100) 0.92 0.55

Table 2. Validity of LupusPRO against SF36, disease activity and disease damage. *n=68 for BILAG Disease Activity Domain Lupus Symptoms SF36 (r, p value) n=236 Disease Damage (r, p value) n=68 (r, p value) n=184* PGA (-0.37, 0.001) SLEDAI ( -0.23, 0.002) LFA (-0.44, 0.001) General BILAG (-0.31,0.01), Muco-cutaneous BILAG (-0.47,0.001) Musculo-skeletal BILAG (-0.13,0.29) Total BILAG (-0.43,0.001) Cognition LFA (-0.19, 0.04) -0.23, 0.06 SLEDAI (-0.17,0.02) Lupus Medication -0.37, 0.001 LFA (-0.15, 0.08) PGA (-0.14, 0.05) PF (0.62, 0.001) Physical Health LFA (-0.25, 0.004) RP (0.57, 0.001) Total BILAG (-0.23,0.05) PGA (-0.14, 0.06) BP (0.75, 0.001) LFA (-0.21, 0.02) Pain-Vitality VT (0.74,0.001) Musculo-skeletal BILAG (-0.26,0.03) Total BILAG (-0.27,0.02) PGA (-0.19, 0.01) SLEDAI (-0.14, 0.05) LFA (-0.20, 0.02) MH (0.64,0.001) Emotional Health Muco-cutaneous BILAG (-0.25,0.04) RE (0.52, 0.001) Musculo-skeletal BILAG (-0.21,0.09) Vasculitis BILAG (-0.31, 0.01) Total BILAG (-0.34,0.01) PGA (-0.20, 0.007) Procreation -0.24,0.05 SLEDAI (-0.18, 0.01) PGA (-0.20, 0.005) SLEDAI (-0.16, 0.03) LFA (-0.23, 0.01) Body Image -0.28,0.03 Muco-cutaneous BILAG (-0.25, 0.04) Vasculitis BILAG (-0.26,0.04) Total BILAG (-0.24,0.05) LFA (-0.21, 0.03) General Health GH (0.58, 0.001) Musculo-skeletal BILAG (-0.26,0.03) Vasculitis BILAG (-0.24, 0.04) PGA (-0.18, 0.01) SLEDAI (-0.22, 0.003) LFA (-0.18, 0.04) Desires/Goals General BILAG (-0.30,0.01) Muco-cutaneous BILAG (-0.33, 0.01) Musculo-skeletal BILAG (-0.35,0.001) Total BILAG (-0.50,0.001) Coping Vasculitis BILAG (-0.25, 0.04) Social support SS (0.20, 0.002) Vasculitis BILAG (-0.23, 0.06) -0.26, 0.04 PGA (0.18, 0.01) Satisfaction with care Musculo-skeletal BILAG (-0.23,0.06) Cardio-Pulmonary BILAG (-0.35, 0.001) PGA (-0.30, 0.001) SLEDAI (-0.32, 0.001) PCS (0.54, 0.001) LFA (-0.29, 0.002) HRQOL MCS (0.64, 0.001) -0.32,0.01 Muco-cutaneous BILAG (-0.23, 0.06) SF6D (0.68, 0.001) Musculo-skeletal BILAG (-0.22,0.08) Vasculitis BILAG (-0.21, 0.09) PCS (0.30, 0.001) Non-HRQOL MCS (0.27, 0.001) Vasculitis BILAG (-0.28, 0.02) SF6D (0.36, 0.001)

Table 3. Criterion validity of LupusPRO Lupus Symptoms PGA mean (SD) (n=182) 0 84.3 (19.4) >0-1 69.6 (23.6) >1 62.1 (28.2) (p=0.001) Cognition 0 76.7 (25.5) >0-1 75.7 (27.9) Lupus Medication >1 66.7 (31.4) (p=0.18) 0 80.4 (26.4) >0-1 81.6 (25.8) >1 68.2 (32.8) (p=0.04) Physical Health 0 85.0 (21.5) >0-1 75.8 (24.2) >1 75.5 (22.7) (p=0.02) Pain-Vitality 0 66.3 (28.9) >0-1 61.2 (27.6) Emotional Health >1 54.8 (31.9) (p=0.14) 0 69.0 (28.6) >0-1 61.4 (29.8) >1 51.1 (31.7) (p=0.01) Procreation 0 93.1 (18.1) >0-1 89.3 (24.8) >1 79.8 (30.5) (p=0.02) Body Image 0 82.9 (23.4) >0-1 74.7 (28.9) >1 66.9 (32.7) (p=0.01) General Health 0 77.5 (18.8) >0-1 76.7 (21.4) >1 63.0 (28.5) (p=0.07) Desires/Goals 0 76.9 (27.4) >0-1 70.1 (27.7) >1 58.7 (34.7) (p=0.008) Coping 0 74.9 (27.9) >0-1 70.0 (26.4) >1 73.6 (32.2) (p=0.56) Social support 0 74.6 (32.5) >0-1 73.9 (29.7) Satisfaction with care >1 80.3 (31.3) (p=0.58) 0 79.7 (29.2) >0-1 78.1 (32.0) >1 92.1 (12.7) (p=0.02) LFA Flare mean (SD) (n=128) Yes 80.5 (21.6) No 51.6 (26.6) (p=0.001) Yes 72.5 (27.6) No 59.3 (27.3) (p=0.03) Yes 80.7 (26.4) No 70 (31.8) (p=0. 0.08) Yes 79.7 (24.6) No 63.8 (22.3) (p=0.003) Yes 60.4 (29.5) No 45 (24.9) (p=0. 01) Yes 65.4 (29.5) No 50.0 (31.3) (p=0. 02) Yes 93.8 (19.5) No 90.0 (27.9) (p=0.42) Yes 79.2 (26.3) No 63.2 (30.5) (p=0. 009) Yes 63.4 (30.4) No 49.5 (26.9) (p=0. 03) Yes 73.3 (28.1) No 60.0 (30.1) (p=0. 0.03) Yes 73.0 (26.4) No 69.7 (31.3) (p=0. 59) Yes 72.5 (32.4) No 67.0 (32.0) (p=0.45) Yes 76.4 (32.0) No 78.0 (28.7) (p=0.82)

Scoring for LupusPRO v1.7 Items Construct Domain Description Reverse Coding 1-3 HRQOL Lupus Symptoms Lupus Symptoms Yes 4-5 HRQOL Cognition Cognition Yes 6-7 HRQOL Lupus Medications Lupus Medications Yes 8-9 HRQOL Procreation Procreation Yes 10-14 HRQOL Physical Health Physical Function, Role Physical Yes 15-19 HRQOL Pain Vitality Pain Vitality Yes 20-25 HRQOL Emotional Health Emotional function, Role Emotional Yes 26-30 HRQOL Body Image Body Image Yes 31-34 N-HRQOL Desires-Goals Desires, Goals, Plans Yes 35-36 N-HRQOL Social support Support system No 37-39 N-HRQOL Coping Coping No 40-43 N-HRQOL Satisfaction with care Satisfaction with Lupus Care No The LupusPRO has 5 point Likert response format, where 0= /not applicable, 1= A little of, 2= Some of, 3=Most of, 4=, 5= applicable (recode as 0 for scoring). Reverse scoring for some items is required (as above). There are 12 observed domains. Item scores are totaled for each domain item and mean domain score is obtained by dividing total score by number of items in that domain. The mean raw domain score is transformed to scores ranging from 0 (worst QOL) to 100 (best QOL) by dividing by 4 ( number of Likert responses {5 responses} minus 1) and n multiplying by 100, as below: (Mean raw domain score/4) x 100= Transformed score for domain. Transformed domain scores are obtainable when at least 50% of items are answered. Total HRQOL and N-HRQOL scores are obtained by averaging transformed domain scores within each construct. Reference List (1) Jolly M, Pickard AS, Wilke C, Lin HW, Khandelwal S, Rodby R et al. Development and Validation of a US Lupus Specific Patient Reported Outcome Measure. Arthritis & Rheum. 56[9s], S113. 2007. (2) Jolly M, Pickard AS, Fogg L, Wilke C, Lin H, Mikolaitis R et al. US Patient Derived Lupus-Specific Patient Reported Outcome Measure (Lupus-PRO ): Validity and Reliability. Arthritis & Rheumatism 2008; 58(9s):S805. (3) Cervera J, Cooray D, Jolly M, Katsaros EP, Moldovan I, Shinada S et al. Predictors of Patient Reported Health Outcomes in A New Lupus Cohort in Sourn California. Arthritis & Rheum 60[10s], S515. 2010.