Relevance of Innovative Trial Design Today. Basket of Baskets and other Innovative Clinical Trials

Similar documents
Next Generation Sequencing in Clinical Practice: Impact on Therapeutic Decision Making

I. Diagnosis of the cancer type in CUP

Transform genomic data into real-life results

Basket Trials: Features, Examples, and Challenges

Oncology Drug Development

The NCI- MATCH (EAY131) Precision Medicine Trial: Lessons Learned and Status Update

Multi-drug, genetic-marker-directed, non-comparative, multi-centre, multi-arm phase II trial in non-small cell lung cancer

How to faster integrate new technologies into clinical practice

CDx in oncology Prof. Christophe Le Tourneau, MD, PhD FEAM Geneva September 27, 2018

Is there a Cookbook for Oncology Clinical Trials?

Dr Yvonne Wallis Consultant Clinical Scientist West Midlands Regional Genetics Laboratory

Basket and Umbrella Trial Designs in Oncology

Pl I enary Tr T anslational Medicine April 30, 2015

Regulatory Landscape for Precision Medicine

Practical Implications of Next Generation Sequencing (NGS) in Breast Cancer: Promises and Challenges

New Drug development and Personalized Therapy in The Era of Molecular Medicine

Molecular Testing in Lung Cancer

Implementation of nation-wide molecular testing in oncology in the French Health care system : quality assurance issues & challenges

Personalised cancer care Information for Medical Specialists. A new way to unlock treatment options for your patients

Genomic tests to personalize therapy of metastatic breast cancers. Fabrice ANDRE Gustave Roussy Villejuif, France

6/22/2017 TARGETING THE TARGETS IN 2017 TARGETING THE TARGETS IN 2017

PLENARY SESSION 1: CLINICAL TRIAL DESIGN IN AN ERA OF HORIZONTAL DRUG DEVELOPMENT Industry Perspective

5 th July 2016 ACGS Dr Michelle Wood Laboratory Genetics, Cardiff

Clinical utility of precision medicine in oncology

Médecine de précision en oncologie

Integration of Genomics Into Clinical Pathways. Precision Medicine and Decision Support

Targeted Agent and Profiling Utilization Registry (TAPUR ) Study. February 2018

NSCLC 2 nd and further line therapies. Egbert F. Smit MD PhD. Dept. Thoracic Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute

Precision Genetic Testing in Cancer Treatment and Prognosis

EXAMPLE. - Potentially responsive to PI3K/mTOR and MEK combination therapy or mtor/mek and PKC combination therapy. ratio (%)

Disruptive innovation in molecular diagnostics. Hilde Windels CEO Biocartis 25 March 2017

Patient Leader Education Summit. Precision Medicine: Today and Tomorrow March 31, 2017

Frequency(%) KRAS G12 KRAS G13 KRAS A146 KRAS Q61 KRAS K117N PIK3CA H1047 PIK3CA E545 PIK3CA E542K PIK3CA Q546. EGFR exon19 NFS-indel EGFR L858R

Giorgio V. Scagliotti Università di Torino Dipartimento di Oncologia

Looking Beyond the Standard-of- Care : The Clinical Trial Option

Advances in Pathology and molecular biology of lung cancer. Lukas Bubendorf Pathologie

Bayesian hierarchical models for adaptive randomization in biomarker-driven studies: Umbrella and platform trials

Big data vs. the individual liver from a regulatory perspective

WINTHER: GUSTAVE ROUSSY GUSTAVE ROUSSY. NOM DU DOCUMENT / Date

Multi-drug phase II trial in non-small cell lung cancer

Lung Cancer Genetics: Common Mutations and How to Treat Them David J. Kwiatkowski, MD, PhD. Mount Carrigain 2/4/17

patients in the era of

Targeted therapies for advanced non-small cell lung cancer. Tom Stinchcombe Duke Cancer Insitute

Circulating Tumor DNA in GIST and its Implications on Treatment

Clinical Grade Genomic Profiling: The Time Has Come

Tissue or Liquid Biopsy? ~For Diagnosis, Monitoring and Early detection of Resistance~

The linking of specific cancer genetic alterations to molecular targeted therapies is driving a new era of personalised medicine

Individualized Cancer Therapy: Chemotherapy Resistance Testing before Therapy

SureSelect Cancer All-In-One Custom and Catalog NGS Assays

Adaptive Design of Affordable Clinical Trials Using Master Protocols in the Era of Precision Medicine

Innovations and Combinations for Novel Anticancer Strategies

Molecular Targets in Lung Cancer

NCCN Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer V Meeting June 15, 2018

Learning from the Impact of the Drug-Diagnostics Strategy in Oncology

Personalized Genetics

Corporate Medical Policy

StrandAdvantage Tissue-Specific Cancer Genomic Tests. Empowering Crucial First-Line Therapy Decisions for Your Patient

Next-generation sequencing based clinical testing for lung cancer in Japan

Secuenciación masiva: papel en la toma de decisiones

Updated Molecular Testing Guideline for the Selection of Lung Cancer Patients for Treatment with Targeted Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors

What is the status of the technologies of "precision medicine?

Overview of Biomarker Development for Immune PD-1/L1 Checkpoint Blockade

NGS in tissue and liquid biopsy

Roche Investor Relations ASCO Planner 2017

Companion & Complementary Diagnostics: Clinical and Regulatory Perspectives

ALCHEMIST. Adjuvant Lung Cancer Enrichment Marker Identification And Sequencing Trials

Personalised Healthcare. will it deliver? Bob Holland Head of Personalised Healthcare & Biomarkers Innovative Medicines AstraZeneca R&D

MET exon 14 mutation: another actionable genomic variation in patients with advanced NSCLC

Next generation diagnostics Bringing high-throughput sequencing into clinical application

Accel-Amplicon Panels

A Day in the Life of a Breast Cancer Doctor: Integrating Omics to Optimize Patient Outcomes. March 17-18, 2015 New York, NY

Case Studies. Ravi Salgia, MD, PhD

Colorectal Cancer in 2017: From Biology to the Clinics. Rodrigo Dienstmann

Evolution of Early Phase Trials: Clinical Trial Design in the Modern Era

The role of big data analytics in the evolution of clinical trials

NGS IN ONCOLOGY: FDA S PERSPECTIVE

Personalised Healthcare (PHC) with Foundation Medicine (FMI) Fatma Elçin KINIKLI, FMI Turkey, Science Leader

Disclosure of Relevant Financial Relationships NON-SMALL CELL LUNG CANCER: 70% PRESENT IN ADVANCED STAGE

Complexity of intra- and inter-pathway loops in colon cancer and melanoma: implications for targeted therapies

Targeted therapy in NSCLC: do we progress? Prof. Dr. V. Surmont. Masterclass 27 september 2018

33 rd Annual J.P. Morgan Healthcare Conference. January 2015

NSCLC: Terapia medica nella fase avanzata. Paolo Bidoli S.C. Oncologia Medica H S. Gerardo Monza

Incorporating Immunotherapy into the treatment of NSCLC

NGS ONCOPANELS: FDA S PERSPECTIVE

DRUGS DEVELOPMENT METHODOLOGY

See how you can guide the path her cancer takes

Select analysis on the next pages. Sample request and sending address see last page. Institut für Pathologie und Molekularpathologie

Should novel molecular therapies replace old knowledge of clinical tumor biology?

Master Protocols for Immunotherapy Combinations

A Blueprint for Drug/Diagnostic Development: Facilitating Development and Use of Curated Genetic Databases

Immunotherapy and Targeted Therapies: The new face of cancer treatment

Leading the Way to Precision Care: Molecular Diagnostics and Therapeutics in Lung Cancers. Mark G Kris, MD Memorial Sloan Kettering New Amsterdam USA

QIAGEN Complete Solutions for Liquid Biopsy Molecular Testing

What is Precision Medicine?

Lung Cancer Update 2016 BAONS Oncology Care Update

Where We ve Been & Where We re Going SWOG FALL MEETING OCTOBER 5, 2018

The oncologist s point of view: the promise and challenges of increasing options for targeted therapies in NSCLC

In 2014, the National Cancer Institute will launch a series of

7/6/2015. Cancer Related Deaths: United States. Management of NSCLC TODAY. Emerging mutations as predictive biomarkers in lung cancer: Overview

Transcription:

Relevance of Innovative Trial Design Today Basket of Baskets and other Innovative Clinical Trials

Outline Precision Medicine Clinical Trials Evolving Field Classic industry-sponsored design: single drug, single disease type, central biomarker analysis Basket Studies Vemurafenib in non-melanoma BRAF V600E mutant tumors Larotrectinib in adult and pediatric NTRK fusion cancers Molecular selection programs multiplexed biomarker analysis Examples of academic studies with novel designs WINTHER Study / LUNG-Matrix / NCI-MATCH Basket of Baskets

Precision Medicine Clinical Trials Evolving Field HER2 positi ve TNBC ER positive HER2 neg

Precision Medicine Clinical Trials Evolving Field KRAS

Long Tail Distribution Precision Medicine Clinical Trials Evolving Field

Classic Precision Medicine in Oncology Study: Single drug, Single disease type, Central biomarker analysis Crizotinib in ALK-translocated NSCLC Approx. 1500 patients Screened 82 patients - Treated High Attrition Kwak E. Et al., N Engl J Med. 2010;363(18):1693-703

Classic Precision Medicine in Oncology Study Turn Around Time - Patient Clinical Deterioration KEYNOTE-024: Phase III study of pembrolizumab vs Chemotherapy as first line for PD-L1-Positive Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer. 1934 patients 500 biomarker positive not randomized 305 allocated 39 % ATTRITION 15 % Reck M. et al.; N Engl J Med. 2016 Oct 8.

Classic Industry-Sponsored Design Issues Sample Exhaustion Subsequent central testing Sample Exhaustion Particularly challenge Small biopsies

Molecular Selection Programs

Multiplexed biomarker analysis Performed locally Molecular Selection Programs Multiplexed Biomarker Analysis Short turn-around time Patient s tumor characterized by the time of requiring participation in a clinical trial Customizable Cost issues

Molecular Selection Programs IMPACT (NCT01505400) Princess Margaret Cancer Centre MD Anderson Cancer Center Patients Enrolled N=678 N=2601 N=708 Enrollment Period Mar 2012 April 2013 May 2012 Jul 2013 -- Sample not analyzed 75 (11 %) 601 (23 %) 66 (9%) Patients >= 1 mutation 176 1203 -- Patients actionable alteration Patients receiving matched targeted agent 43 627 290 23 (clinical trial) 123 [83 clinical trial + 40 off label] 3 % 5 % MOSCATO Institute Gustave Roussy 140 20 %

Basket Studies Single Drug, Histology Agnostic Approach

Basket Studies Vemurafenib in non-melanoma BRAF V600E mutant tumors Same Drug (single agent or in combination) Patients selected by a common molecular alteration Different tumor types Arm 1 Arm 2 Arm 3 Arm 4 Arm 5 Arm 6 Arm 7 Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Ovarian Cancer Colorectal Cancer Cholangiocarcinoma Breast Cancer Multiple Myeloma Others Hyman DM et al. N Engl J Med (2015) 373:726-736

Basket Studies Vemurafenib in non-melanoma BRAF V600E mutant tumors Hyman DM et al. N Engl J Med (2015) 373:726-736

Basket Studies Larotrectinib in Adults and Pediatric NTRK Fusion Tumors Presented By David Hyman at 2017 ASCO Annual Meeting

Basket Studies Larotrectinib in Adults and Pediatric NTRK Fusion Tumors Presented By David Hyman at 2017 ASCO Annual Meeting

Basket Studies Larotrectinib in Adults and Pediatric NTRK Fusion Tumors Presented By David Hyman at 2017 ASCO Annual Meeting

Basket Studies Larotrectinib in Adults and Pediatric NTRK Fusion Tumors Presented By David Hyman at 2017 ASCO Annual Meeting

Basket Studies: Challenges Different protocols co-existing Design not easily adaptable Different molecular selection methods Tumor sample exhaustion Molecular selection program cost Rare mutations / rare populations Difficult to find in a single institution Cost-effectiveness issues

Examples of Academic Studies with Novel Designs

WINTHER Study

LUNG-MATRIX Middleton G et al. Ann Oncol 2015; 2464

NCI-MATCH Arm Drug Alteration Arm Drug Alteration A Afatinib EGFR mutation S1 Trametinib NF1 mutations B Afatinib HER2 mutations S2 Trametinib GNAQ or GNA11 m C1 Crizotinib MET mutation T Vismodegib SMO / PTCH1 m C2 Crizotinib MET 14 exón U Defactinib NF2 loss E Osimertinib EGFR T790M V Sunitinib ckit mutations F Crizotinib ALK transloc X Dasatinib DDR2 mutation G Crizotinib ROS1 transloc Y AZD5363 AKT mutation H Dabrafenib + Trametinib J Trastuzumab + Pertuzumab BRAF V600E or V600K HER2 amplification W AZD4547 FGFR alterations Z1B Palbociclib CCND1, 2 and 3 ampl L TAK228 mtor mutation Z1C Palbociclib CDK4 or CDK6 ampl M TAK228 TSC1 or TSC2 Z1E Larotrectinib NTRK fusions R Trametinib BRAF fusions or Other BRAF mut Z1I AZD1775 BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutations

Basket of Baskets (BoB) A modular multi-basket trial to improve personalize medicine in cancer patients

Basket of Baskets: Study Design

Basket of Baskets: iprofiler Multiplexed NGS platform Sample optimization CDx Two tiers Tier 1: customized, certified NGS panels in each center Rapid turnover Diminishing patient attrition Companion Diagnostic (CDx) co-development Tier 2: Centralized. Whole exomeseq, mrna analysis, cfdna Subsequent validation across sites to become Tier 1 test Flexibility to incorporate new platforms and biomarkers Allow development of Multimarker CDx New technology

Basket of Baskets: Industry Sponsored Basket Trials Access to a large number of patients with molecularly profiled tumors (iprofiler) Common contract/budgeting policy Companion Diagnostic Validation Open to collaboration open to include new basket trials

Basket of Baskets ibasket ibasket Investigator Initiated Umbrella protocol Multi-modular Modules can be added or droppedout based on the results Each module has individual arms in genomically selected populations

Arm Structure Potential use of different statistical designs per module or treatment arm Module 1 Bayesian model Provides flexibility in case the number of patients identified by iprofiler and enrolled in module 1 differs from the estimated number at the time of treatment design Adaptative design To evaluate the most appropriate cut-off for arms evaluating continuous variables (such as CNA)

Basket of Baskets: Outcomes

Key Inclusion/Exclusion Patients must have histologically or cytological confirmed malignancy that is metastatic or unresectable who have progressed to standard therapy, who are receiving a standard anticancer treatment but no subsequent approved treatment would be available upon progression, who are unable to receive standard therapy, or for whom standard therapy does not exist. Patient must have ECOG performance status of 0 or 1. Patients must be 18 year-old or older. Patients must have measurable disease according to RECIST 1.1. (see section 16.1 for details) Patients must have enough tumor tissue for molecular analysis: Patients providing fresh frozen tissue must provide 4 core biopsies or equivalent. Fresh frozen tissue must be preferentially collected from a tumor biopsy; hence, patients must have disease amenable to be biopsied. Otherwise, the patient should have fresh frozen tumor tissue stored in a biobank or biorepository. Patients providing formalin-fixed paraffin embedded tissue (FFPE) must provide a minimum amount of tissue ranging from 20 to 28 slides depending on the sample tumor cellularity. If there is not enough archival tissue to meet this criterion, the patient must undergo a tumor biopsy. Efforts will be made to provide fresh frozen tissue in at least one quarter of the participating patients. The proportion of patients that might provide fresh frozen tissue might change based on the results from the molecular analysis. Adequate organ function Women of child-bearing potential and men must agree to use adequate contraception

iprofiler Schema Screening Informed consent Screening <= 5 days from sample < 72 h prior Tumor MTB Tier 1 Results discussion signature visit reception tumor biopsy biopsy Visit Informed consent 1 X Medical history X Cancer history 2 X Demographics 3 X ECOG PS X X Symptoms X X Height, weight X Physical exam X CBC 4 X Biochemistry 4 X Coagulation 4 X Serum pregnancy test X Blood collection for germline X DNA assessment Review eligibility criteria <--------------------------------------------X-----------------------------------------------> Additional criterion for patients providing archival tissue (fresh frozen or FFPE) Tumor quality assessment 5 X Additional criteria for patients undergoing tumor biopsy CBC 6 X Tumor biopsy 7 All patients Tier 1 Report MTB discussion Tier 1 Report review with patient Tier 2 Report MTB discussion Tier 2 Report review with patient X X X MTB Tier 2 (X) 8 (X) 8

Cancer Core Europe Basket of Baskets Taskforces integration: Clinical Trials Genomics Data Sharing Imaging Immunotherary Education Legal - Contracts

Conclusions More patients accesing to anti-cancer personalized therapy Cost-efficient plattform: Evaluate anticancer activity Expedite drug development Creating genomically annotated clinical database Platform for translational research Flexibility Long-lasting Project

Acknowledgments UITM Josep Tabernero Jordi Rodon Analia Azaro Guillem Argiles Maria Ochoa de Olza Juan Martin Maria Vieito Ignacio Matos VHIO Projects /Management Office Alex Piris Elena Chavarria Susana Muñoz Genomics Group Ana Vivancos Cancer Immunotherapy Group Alena Gros ODysSey Group Rodrigo Dienstmann Cancer Core Europe Fabien Calvo Alexander Eggermont Richard Baird Christophe Massard Richard Schlenk Jonas Bergh Jan Schellens Frans Opdam James Wason Mikel Valgañon Lodewyk Wessels Roche Luisa Veronese Astrid Kiermaier