Sleeping Beauty: Current applications and future strategies. CAR-TCR Summit 2017 Partow Kebriaei, MD

Similar documents
Donor derived CD19 specific CAR + T cell therapy after haploidentical hematopoietic stem cell transplantation Laurence J.N. Cooper Hyatt Orlando

A Biopharmaceutical Company Focused on Controlled Immunotherapies and Point-of-Care Solutions

THERAPEUTIC IMPLICATIONS OF PREPARING AND ADMINISTERING INNATE IMMUNE CELLS. 9:40 am to 10:10 pm Laurence Cooper

ZIOPHARM / Intrexon Graft-Versus-Host Disease Exclusive Channel Collaboration SEPTEMBER 28, 2015

The Next Generation of Immunotherapy Platforms. 36 th Annual J.P. Morgan Healthcare Conference January 2018

Stem Cell Transplantation and Cellular Therapy, MDACC, Houston, TX. Intrexon, Germantown, MD. Pediatrics, MDACC. Ziopharm Oncology, Boston, MA

Multi-Virus-Specific T cell Therapy for Patients after HSC and CB Transplant

Federica Galaverna, 1 Daria Pagliara, 1 Deepa Manwani, 2 Rajni Agarwal-Hashmi, 3 Melissa Aldinger, 4 Franco Locatelli 1

Phase I trials using Sleeping Beauty to generate CD19-specific CAR T cells

ACTR (Antibody Coupled T-cell Receptor): A universal approach to T-cell therapy

Engineering an Immunity to Cancer: A New Era of Adoptive Cellular Therapy with Tisagenlecleucel (Kymriah) in Pediatric ALL

Abstract #163 Michael Kalos, PhD

Improving the Outcome of Stem Cell Transplants for Cancer Treatment Using Multivirus-Specific T Cells (Viralym-M)

An Introduction to Bone Marrow Transplant

CARs vs. BiTE in ALL. David L Porter, MD Jodi Fisher Horowitz Professor University of Pennsylvania Health System Abramson Cancer Center

MUD SCT. Pimjai Niparuck Division of Hematology, Department of Medicine Ramathibodi Hospital, Mahidol University

Workshop I: Patient Selection Current indication for HCT in adults. Shinichiro Okamoto MD, PhD Keio University, Tokyo, Japan

One Day BMT Course by Thai Society of Hematology. Management of Graft Failure and Relapsed Diseases

Transforming patients lives through cellular immunotherapy. Next Generation Cellular Immunotherapy June 2017

Precision CAR T Cell Therapeutics. Carl June October 15, 2018

Chimeric An+gen Receptor (CAR) Modified T Cell Therapy: Mee#ng the Unmet Need in Follicular Lymphoma

Donor Lymphocyte Infusion for Malignancies Treated with an Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem-Cell Transplant

BMTCN REVIEW COURSE PRE-TRANSPLANT CARE

RXi Pharmaceuticals. Immuno-Oncology World Frontiers Conference. January 23, 2018 NASDAQ: RXII. Property of RXi Pharmaceuticals

Neutrophil Recovery: The. Posttransplant Recovery. Bus11_1.ppt

Experience of patients transplanted with naïve T cell depleted stem cell graft in CMUH

The future of HSCT. John Barrett, MD, NHBLI, NIH Bethesda MD

Children s Hospital of Philadelphia Annual Progress Report: 2011 Formula Grant

CAR T-CELLS: ENGINEERING IMMUNE CELLS TO TREAT CANCER. Roman GALETTO, PhD 17 th Club Phase 1 Annual Meeting April 5 th Paris

Corporate Medical Policy

THE ROLE OF TBI IN STEM CELL TRANSPLANTATION. Dr. Biju George Professor Department of Haematology CMC Vellore

Advances in Adoptive Cellular Therapy of Cancer. Melanoma Bridge Meeting December 5, 2014

Reduced-intensity Conditioning Transplantation

Haploidentical Transplantation: The Answer to our Donor Problems? Mary M. Horowitz, MD, MS CIBMTR, Medical College of Wisconsin January 2017

Objectives. Emily Whitehead 10/11/2018. Chimeric Antigen Recepetor T-Cells (CAR-T) CAR-T Therapy: The Past, The Present, and The Future

Haplo vs Cord vs URD Debate

Immunotherapy on the Horizon: Adoptive Cell Therapy

CAR-T Therapy: The Past, The Present, and The Future. Nilay Shah, MD Michael Chargualaf, PharmD, BCOP WVU Medicine Mary Babb Randolph Cancer Center

Supplemental Figure 1. Protein L

CAR-T CELLS: NEW HOPE FOR CANCER PATIENTS

5/9/2018. Bone marrow failure diseases (aplastic anemia) can be cured by providing a source of new marrow

Clinical Policy: Donor Lymphocyte Infusion

Bone Marrow Transplantation and the Potential Role of Iomab-B

UPDATE Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation for Lymphoma and Myeloma

New Evidence reports on presentations given at EHA/ICML Bendamustine in the Treatment of Lymphoproliferative Disorders

Corporate Medical Policy

Donatore HLA identico di anni o MUD giovane?

Corporate Presentation. December, 2018

Bone Marrow Transplantation in Myelodysplastic Syndromes. An overview for the Myelodysplasia Support Group of Ottawa

Is in vitro T-cell depletion necessary for Haploidentical TransplantationTitle of Presentation. Disclosure of Interest: Nothing to Disclose

Corporate Medical Policy

Artificial Antigen Presenting Cells as a Standardized Platform for Tumor Infiltrating Lymphocyte (TIL) expansion

COMPANY OVERVIEW January 2018

Clinical Policy: Donor Lymphocyte Infusion Reference Number: CP.MP.101 Last Review Date: 11/17

Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation: State of the Art in 2018 RICHARD W. CHILDS M.D. BETHESDA MD

Protocol. Hematopoietic Stem-Cell Transplantation for Primary Amyloidosis

March Corporate Presentation

Programmed Cellular Immunotherapies

How to prevent Infections in Patients undergoing allo-hsct?

IDWeek 2014, Session: 186, Late Breaker Oral Abstracts Saturday, October 11, 2014, Presentation No. LB 3

COHEM Barcellona 2012 Hemoglobinopathies debate

Conflict of Interest Natural Line of Defense: Update on Immunotherapy in Hematologic Malignancies. Immunogenicity of Cancer.

An Overview of Blood and Marrow Transplantation

Stem Cell Sources 2/22/13. Cellular Therapy Today and Tomorrow. Cellular Therapy in HCT. Bone Marrow

Transplantation - Challenges for the future. Dr Gordon Cook S t James s Institute of Oncology, Leeds Teaching Hospitals Trust

A phase I pilot study of safety and feasibility of stem cell therapy for AIDS lymphoma using stem cells treated with a lentivirus vector encoding

Exploring Immunotherapies: Beyond Checkpoint Inhibitors

Anticancer cellular immunotherapies derived from umbilical cord blood

Yescarta (axicabtagene ciloleucel)

T cell manipulation of the graft: Yes

The question is not whether or not to deplete T-cells, but how to deplete which T-cells

PAX5-JAK2 fusion in acute lymphoblastic leukaemia. Dr Andrew Baldi Royal Children s Hospital 24 February 2017 Melbourne

Trends in Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation. AAMAC Patient Education Day Oct 2014

T Cell Activation. Patricia Fitzgerald-Bocarsly March 18, 2009

ASH 2011 aktualijos: MSC TPŠL gydyme. Mindaugas Stoškus VULSK HOTC MRMS

Review of Stem Cell Collection Data 2016 Ronan Foley, Professor, Director Stem Cell Laboratory, McMaster University

CAR T-Cell Therapy for Lymphoma: Assessing Long-Term Durability. Julie M. Vose, MD, MBA

Introduction to Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation

Chimeric Antigen Receptor - CAR T cell therapy. Frederick L. Locke, MD 2/17/2017

Transforming science into medicine

Living immunotherapies. Corporate Presentation

Advancing Cell Therapies

"Chemotherapy based stem cell mobilization: pro and con"

Important new concerns or changes to the current ones will be included in updates of YESCARTA s RMP.

. TCR Alpha, Beta and CD19+ Cell Depleted Haploidentical Transplant for Primary Immunodeficiency Disorders Feb 22 nd,2018

National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. Single Technology Appraisal (STA)

Relapsed/Refractory Hodgkin Lymphoma

4nd Patient and Family Day

08/02/59. Tumor Immunotherapy. Development of Tumor Vaccines. Types of Tumor Vaccines. Immunotherapy w/ Cytokine Gene-Transfected Tumor Cells

EBMT2008_22_44:EBMT :29 Pagina 454 CHAPTER 30. HSCT for Hodgkin s lymphoma in adults. A. Sureda

What s a Transplant? What s not?

Background. Outcomes in refractory large B-cell lymphoma with traditional standard of care are extremely poor 1

Tumor Antigens in the Age of Engineered T cell Therapies

R/R DLBCL Treatment Landscape

OSCO/OU ASH-SABC Review. Lymphoma Update. Mohamad Cherry, MD

ALLOGENEIC STEM CELL TRANSPLANTATION FOR ACUTE MYELOBLASTIC LEUKEMIAS

Children s Hospital of Philadelphia Annual Progress Report: 2011 Formula Grant

Virological Surveillance in Paediatric HSCT Recipients

Reuben BENJAMIN, MD, PhD, Principal Investigator

Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplantation for Cutaneous T-cell Lymphoma: Updated results from a single center

Transcription:

Sleeping Beauty: Current applications and future strategies CAR-TCR Summit 2017 Partow Kebriaei, MD

Outline Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) technology Viral versus nonviral vectors Results of current clinical trials utilizing the Sleeping Beauty (SB) platform Future strategies utilizing the SB platform to target hematologic malignancies with CARs and solid tumors with T- cell receptor (TCR)s Support provided by ZIOPHARM Oncology

a b Current CAR, TCR T-cell technology Uses a genetically-engineered CAR or TCR that is: Transduced into T cells using viral and non-vectors and Expressed in T cells which are expanded ex vivo and then administered to patients to target tumor cells in the body The introduced CAR and TCR redirect T-cell specificity to target cancer cells Recipient Endogenous immune response fails to halt cancer Intracellular targets T cell TCR CAR T cell T cell genetically modified ex vivo to redirect specificity Cell surface targets

Allogeneic, autologous CAR T-cells One allogeneic donor into multiple recipients Made in advance of need and infused on demand Allogeneic Donor Viral gene transfer Off-the-shelf (OTS) Engineered T cells Recipients One autologous donor/recipient Made as needed Readily available Barriers: Requirement for lymphodepletion product. Rejection Potential of for infused T cells rejection curtails of anti-tumor modified effect Only T cells. applicable to CARs (not solid tumors) Very little clinical data. Current practice Autologous Donor Viral gene transfer Engineered T cells Recipient Most commonly Barriers: Requirement used. for lymphodepletion Potential for Cost Time manufacture to manufacture failure. (during Long which time to patients make. condition deteriorates) Autologous

Non-viral versus viral transduction Release DNA plasmid Packaging cells Lentivirus Ex vivo gene transfer Sleeping Beauty Release DNA plasmid Non-viral gene transfer: Sleeping Beauty Cost effective Slower transduction rate More nimble production: Customizable Viral gene transfer: Retrovirus & Lentivirus High cost Faster transduction rate Labor intensive, challenging to customize

Limitations of current approach to CAR + (& TCR + ) T Cells Heterogeneity in end-product after ex vivo culture Failure to manufacture. Risk of insertional mutagenesis Time for manufacture Lack of control of T cells after infusion Need for lymphodepletion Specialized treatment centers for administration

SLEEPING BEAUTY: CLINICAL TRIALS AT MD ANDERSON CANCER CENTER

SB transposon/transposase Transposon DNA plasmid IR/DR hef1a Transposase DNA plasmid (or in vitro transcribed mrna) CMVIE IR/DR CAR SB11 Transposase Transposase CAR Co-delivery into cells by nucleofection Transposon Nucleus Cytoplasm scfv Extracellular scaffold Non-viral gene transfer using Sleeping Beauty system to express CAR, TCR and membranebound IL-15 (mbil15) Sleeping Beauty DNA plasmid Release Intracellular domains Showing signaling motifs Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) a b T-cell receptor (TCR) Membrane bound IL-15 (mbil15)

First-in-human application of SB system CAR + T cells infused after hematopoietic stem-cell transplantation Methods available at: J Vis Exp. 2013 Feb 1;(72):e50070. Irradiated AaPC (feeder cells) derived from K-562 cells and modified to co-express CD19, CD86, CD137L, membranebound IL-15 (mbil15, and CD64) 9

Trial schema Study populations CD19 + lymphoid malignancies beyond first remission, induction failure, or relapse at time of HSCT 1-65 yrs-old for allo-hsct; up to 75 yrs-old for auto-hsct Preparative treatment Auto-HSCT BEAM prep PBSC day 0, CAR T cells day +2 Allo-HSCT HSCT prep per MD choice Donor-derived T cells 6-12 weeks post HSCT GVHD prophylaxis maintained J Clin Invest. 2016 Sep 1;126(9):3363-76. Dose Level Single T-cell dose* A >5 x 10 7 /m 2 but < 5 x 10 8 /m 2 B >5 x 10 8 /m 2 but < 5 x 10 9 /m 2 Dose Level Single T-cell dose* A Not to exceed 10 6 /m 2 B >10 6 /m 2 but < 10 7 /m 2 C >10 7 /m 2 but < 5x 10 7 /m 2 D >5x10 7 /m 2 but < 10 8 /m 2 *Per body surface area

Trial Summary I Successful manufacture of T-cell products 200 ml of peripheral blood (avoiding costs & inconvenience of apheresis) Safely infuse patients No immediate or late toxicity Decreased GVHD rate at 11% Administered up to 10 8 /m 2 genetically modified haplo-identical T cells Decreased CMV reaction, 24% vs. 41% 1 Outpatient infusions Cytokines Low levels of cytokine at time of T-cell infusion Mild elevation, peak at ~2 weeks No cytokine storm 1. J Oncol Parm Practice, 2014, 20:257 1 st generation complete

First-in-human use of SB system: Summary II Persistence of CAR + T cells Average, days Max, days Autologous 201 360 Allogeneic 51 180 Survival of recipients after CAR + T cells PFS OS Autologous 83%, 3-yr 100% 3-yr Allogeneic (all) 53%, 1-yr 63%, 1-yr Allo, haploidentical 75%, 1-yr 100%, 1-yr CAR + T cells exhibit longer persistence in the auto-hsct group. No apparent positive correlation with T-cell dose or disease burden. J Clin Invest. 2016 Sep 1;126(9):3363-76

1 st generation trial: Evaluate SB system (first-in-human studies) 1 st generation SB platform in two trials infusing CAR + T cells after HSCT showed favorable PFS and OS in both autologous and allogeneic cohorts 1 compared with historical controls. 2,3 1. J Clin Invest. 2016 Sep 1;126(9):3363-76 2. Blood 125, 2579-2581 (2015) 3. Curr Hematol Malig Rep 7, 144-152 (2012)

Shortening manufacturing time for CD19-specific CAR + T cells 1 st generation complete 2 nd generation ongoing J Clin Invest. 2016 Sep 1;126(9):3363 Shortening manufacturing process time from 4 weeks to ~ 2 weeks as T cells co-cultured on feeder cells

2 nd generation trial with SB-modified T cells for active CD19 + malignancies clinicaltrials.gov: NCT02529813 CD19-specific CAR + T cells; SB-based gene transfer T cells modified to express CD19-specific CARs with a CD8 stalk region that signals through CD28 and CD3z Shortened manufacturing time CAR + T cells infused following lymphodepletion in active disease Phase 1, dose escalation Actively recruiting Dose level -1 10 5 CAR + T-cell dose/kg +1 > 10 5, but 10 6 +2 > 10 6, but 10 7 +3 > 10 7, but 10 8 +4 > 10 8, but 10 9

SLEEPING BEAUTY: COMBINING CAR WITH CYTOKINE SIGNALING

High serum levels of IL-15 associated with tumor regression J Clin Oncol. 2017 Jun 1;35(16):1803-1813

Improving CAR + T cells by cosignaling through IL-15 receptor Co-expression of CAR and mbil-15 Combination CAR IL-15 Type I cytokine Signal 3 Signals 1 & 2 T cell Membrane bound IL-15 (mbil15) scfv Extracellular scaffold Intracellular domains Showing signaling motifs JAK STAT Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2016 Nov 29;113(48):E7788-E7797

Membrane bound IL-15 augments antitumor activity of CAR + T cells

3 rd generation SB technology based on point-of-care (POC) Rapid manufacture: Manufactured as needed in <2 days at POC without need to ex vivo expand cells Target tumors with CARs or TCRs Sleeping Beauty non-viral system mbil15 to keep T-cells in naive, powerful state Distributed manufacture and infusion similar to blood-banking practices Safety switch will allow T-cells to be tuned to patient s need 3 rd generation progressing

Pre-clinical data supporting POC Transposon DNA plasmid Transposase DNA plasmid (or in vitro transcribed mrna) IR/DR IR/DR hef1a 1 2 CAR CMVIE SB11 Transposase Transposase CAR Transposon Co-delivery into cells by electroporation Cytoplasm Nucleus Days: 0 1 7 14 21 28 Standard Manufacture (4- Stim) Mononuclear Cells 2-Stim P-O-C: < 2 days T N T SCM T CM T EM T Eff Nucleofection (DNA transposon & DNA transposase) Stimulation with K562 AaPC 21

Disease-free survival (%) Tumor flux (p/s/cm 2 /sr) Tumor flux (p/s/cm 2 /sr) Tumor flux (p/s/cm 2 /sr) POC-generated T cells co-expressing CAR and mb IL-15 Harnessing mbil15 so that infused T cells propagate inside, removing the need to pre-expand before administration 10 10 11 11 Tumor Tumor only only 10 10 10 10 10 10 9 9 10 10 8 8 POC-CAR neg T T cells cells 10 11 10 10 10 9 10 8 POC-mbIL15-CAR T cells POC-mbIL15-CAR T cells POC-CAR T cells POC CAR neg T cells 10 10 7 7 10 10 6 6 10 7 10 6 10 10 5 10 5 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 100 75 50 25 Days after tumor injection 0 0 10 20 30 40 50 Days after tumor injection Days after tumor injection (3/5) (3/5) Days after tumor injection Tumor only * POC-CAR T cells POC-mbIL15-CAR T cells POC-CAR neg T cells Electroporated (Day 0) <2 days infusion 10 6 CAR + T cells/mouse (Day 1 expression*) *Integrated & episomal expression * * POC CAR T cells POC mbil15-car T cells ASH: December 4 Publication Number: 2807

Competitive advantage achieved by POC Viral-based POC Solutions Reduce concerns regarding heterogeneity of product Major reduction in costs Improve scalability Very rapidly deliver T-cell therapy T cells targeting solid tumors, as CAR is replaced with TCR 23

SLEEPING BEAUTY: TARGETING SOLID TUMORS WITH TCR-MODIFIED T CELLS

Personalized TCR-modified T cells Tumor antigen is not known before the patient arrives Tumor and normal cells are interrogated to determine the neoantigen TCRs against known tumor antigen are prepared in real time TCRs rapidly expressed in autologous T cells using SB platform via POC Donation a T cell b Targeting neoantigen(s) Endogenous TCR Tumor a Genetically modified a Generated using P-O-C b b Introduced TCR mbil15 Control persistence Recipient

TCR + T cells specific for neoantigens using SB system Mol Ther. 2016 Jun;24(6):1078-89

Competitive advantage of POC Reduce concerns regarding heterogeneity of product Major reduction in costs Improve scalability Rapidly deliver T-cell therapy T cells targeting solid tumors, as CAR is replaced with TCR 27

Harnessing genetically modified T cells using SB system Potential of point-of-care (P-O-C) 1 st era Viral-based gene transfer 2 nd era Sleeping Beauty non-viral gene transfer CAR + Hematologic cancers 3 rd era Shorten manufacture with IL-15 signaling Final era Point-ofcare TCR + Solid tumors 28

Summary First generation trial demonstrated safety and feasibility of the SB platform Second generation trial is testing a modified CAR with shorter manufacturing time using SB platform Third generation trial to rapidly infuse CAR + mbil15 + T cells in < 2 days using SB platform

THANK YOU pkebriae@mdanderson.org