Tratamiento de la Hepatitis C Rafael Esteban Hospital General Universitario Valle de Hebrón Barcelona

Similar documents
Clinical Cases Hepatitis C Naïve Patients. Rafael Esteban Liver Unit. Hospital General Universitari Vall Hebron. Barcelona.

Protease inhibitor based triple therapy in treatment experienced patients

Hepatitis C: Management of Previous Non-responders with First Line Protease Inhibitors

ABCs of Hepatitis C: What s New. The Long-Awaited New Era: Protease Inhibitors for HCV Genotype 1

How to optimize current therapy for GT1 patients Shortened therapy with IFNa-based therapy

ةي : لآا ةرقبلا ةروس

Hepatitis C Therapy Falk Symposium September 20, 2008

29th Viral Hepatitis Prevention Board Meeting

Management of CHC G1 patients who are relapsers or non-responders to Peg IFN and RBV therapy: Wait or Triple Therapy?

New Therapies on the Horizon in Hepatitis C Patients Paul Y. Kwo, MD

Hepatitis C: Management of Treatment Naïve Patients with First Line Protease Inhibitors

Treatement Experienced patients without cirrhosis. Rafael Esteban Hospital Universitario Valle Hebron Barcelona

Express Scripts, Inc. monograph dated 5/25/2011; selected revision 6/1/2011

Optimal ltherapy in non 1 genotypes:

Hepatitis C Treatment 2014

Optimal Treatment with Boceprevir. Michael Manns

ASSAYS UTILZIED TO MONITOR HCV AND ITS TREATMENT

47 th Annual Meeting AISF

New developments in HCV research and their implications for front-line practice

Simeprevir + PEG + RBV in Treatment-Naïve Genotype 1 QUEST-1 Trial

The role of triple therapy with protease inhibitors in hepatitis C virus genotype 1na «ve patients

BOCEPREVIR (BOC): EVIDENCE FROM TRIALS

Antiviral agents in HCV

CURRENT TREATMENTS. Mitchell L Shiffman, MD Director Liver Institute of Virginia. Richmond and Newport News, VA, USA

Predictors of Response to Hepatitis C Therapy in the DAA Era. Pablo Barreiro Servicio de Enfermedades Infecciosas Hospital Carlos III, Madrid

HCV Case Study. Treat Now or Wait for New Therapies

Personalised Treatment with Telaprevir in Graham R Foster Professor of Hepatology Queen Marys University of London

5/12/2016. Learning Objectives. Management of Hepatitis C Virus Genotype 2 or 3 Infected Treatment-Naive or Experienced Patients

Treatments of Genotype 2, 3,and 4: Now and in the future

SAVINO BRUNO, MD Director Internal Medicine and Hepatology Unit AO Fatebenefratelli e Oftalmico, Milano

Current Treatments for HCV

Treatment Options in HCV Relapsers and Nonresponders. Raymond T. Chung, M.D.

Clinical Management: Treatment of HCV Mono-infection

Personalizzazione della Cura in Epatologia. Epatite Cronica C: Pazienti con Genotipo 2

Virological Tools and Monitoring in the DAA Era

Oral combination therapy: future hepatitis C virus treatment? "Lancet Oct 30;376(9751): Oral combination therapy with a nucleoside

Infection with hepatitis C virus (HCV) is a global health concern,

Updates on Current Status of HCV Therapy

New Therapeutic Strategies: Polymerase Inhibitors

Introduction. The ELECTRON Trial

For the RESPOND-2 Investigators

Treatment of chronic hepatitis C in drug-naïve patients

Phase 3. Treatment Experienced. Ledipasvir-Sofosbuvir +/- Ribavirin in HCV Genotype 1 ION-2. Afdhal N, et al. N Engl J Med. 2014;370:

Treatment of chronic hepatitis C in HIV co-infected patients

What is the Optimized Treatment Duration? To Overtreat versus Undertreat. Nancy Reau, MD Associate Professor of Medicine University of Chicago

Pharmacological management of viruses in obese patients

Interferon-based and interferon-free new treatment options

Treatment with the New Direct Acting Antivirals for Hepatitis C

Treatment of Hepatitis C in HIV-Coinfected Patients. Vincent Soriano Department of Infectious Diseases Hospital Carlos III Madrid, Spain

Emerging Therapies for HCV: Highlights from AASLD 2012 (Part 2)

Should Elderly CHC Patients (>70 years old) be Treated?

Emerging Therapies for HCV: Highlights from AASLD 2012 (Part 2)

Hepatitis C Virus Treatments: Present and Future

EASL 2013 Interferon Free, All Oral Regimens for Hepatitis C. Maria Buti Hospital Universitario Valle Hebron Barcelona Spain

Review Article Hepatitis C Virus: A Critical Appraisal of New Approaches to Therapy

SYNOPSIS Final Clinical Study Report for Study AI444031

How do you optimize HCV Treatment for Cirrhotic Patients APASL STC Cebu

Associate Professor of Medicine University of Chicago

Hepatitis C Resistance Associated Variants (RAVs)

Disclosures 29/09/2014. Genetic determinants of. HCV treatment outcome. IDEAL: IL28B-type is the strongest pre-treatment predictor of SVR

Case #1. Case #1. Case #1: Audience vote VS. The Great Debate: When to Treat HCV in our HIV coinfected patients

VII CURSO AVANCES EN INFECCIÓN VIH Y HEPATITIS VIRALES

Treating HCV Genotype 2 & 3

Triple therapy with telaprevir or boceprevir: management of side effects

Primary Care for Hepatitis B and C:

Areas of Interest. HCV Epidemiology, Natural History HCV Treatment. HBV Epidemiology and Prevention. Monoinfected Coinfected

Emerging Approaches for the Treatment of Hepatitis C Virus

Dr Janice Main Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London

Best of AASLD 2010 For IAGH. April 2011 Reza Malekzadeh M.D. AGAF Professor of Medicne DDRC/TUMS

Treatment of genotype 4 patient. with cirrhosis. Vincent LEROY Clinique Universitaire d Hépato-Gastroentérologie INSERM U823 CHU de Grenoble

Month/Year of Review: November 2011 End date of literature search: 4 th Quarter alone

HCV: Racial Disparities. Charles D. Howell, M.D., A.G.A.F Professor of Medicine University of Maryland School of Medicine Baltimore, MD

SVR Updates from the 2013 EASL

NUCs for Chronic Hepatitis B. Rafael Esteban Hospital Universitario Valle Hebron and Ciberehd del Instituto Carlos III. Barcelona.

Case 4: A 61-year-old man with HCV genotype 3 with cirrhosis. Ira M. Jacobson, M.D. Weill Cornell Medical College New York, New York USA

Hepatitis C Emerging Treatment Paradigms

Treatment Targets HCV Genotype 1 & PIs Treating HCV G2&3 Future Therapies. Advances in treatment of HCV Dr John F Dillon

The Changing World of Hepatitis C

ASSESSMENT PRIOR TO TREATMENT DO WE NEED IL28B TESTING?

ICVH 2016 Oral Presentation: 28

Highlights of AASLD 2012 CCO Official Conference Coverage of the 2012 Annual Meeting of the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases

Future strategies with new DAAs

Background: Narlaprevir (SCH )

Update in the Management of Hepatitis C: What Does the Future Hold

Significance of Hepatitis C. The Evolving Burden of Hepatitis C. The Bad News... The Good News... Chronic Hepatitis C Can be Cured

Evolution of Therapy in HCV

Dr. Siddharth Srivastava

Latest Treatment Updates for GT 2 and GT 3 Patients

Les Inhibiteurs de Protéase du VHC

Clinical Сase A previously relapse to PEG IFN + RBV in HCV G3a patient. Konstantin Zhdanov

HIV and Hepatitis C: Advances in Treatment

Antiviral treatment in HCV cirrhotic patients on waiting list

Boceprevir for previously untreated patients with chronic hepatitis C Genotype 1 infection: a US-based cost-effectiveness modeling study

Hepatitis C Management and Treatment

Direct acting anti-virals: the near future

Update on the Treatment of HCV

Global Hepatitis Programme. Guideline development for Hepatitis C virus Screening, Care and Treatment in low- and middle-income countries

Gane et al. BMC Infectious Diseases (2017) 17:389 DOI /s

Michael Fried, MD University of North Carolina Chapel Hill, NC. Ira Jacobson, MD Weill Cornell Medical College New York, NY

Wilhelminenspital, Vienna, Austria; 5 Queen Mary Hospital, University of London, Barts Health, London, UK; 6

Transcription:

Tratamiento de la Hepatitis C Rafael Esteban Hospital General Universitario Valle de Hebrón Barcelona

rrent HCV Therapy 8% % sustained response 6% 4% 2% % 54-61% 41% 34% 25% 16% 6% IFN 24w IFN 48w Peg IFN-R 24w IFN-R 48w Peg-R

Standard de Tratamiento: Peginterferon α + ribavirina HCV Genotype Genotype 1 (4, 5, 6) Genotype 2/3 CV-RNA quantitative at week 12 2 2 log drop Peginterferon-α plus -12 mg ribavirin for 48 weeks Peginterferon-α plus 8 mg ribavirin for 24 weeks

ctors Related to Therapy Response Virus Genotype Viral load Treatment Adherence Early Virologic Response Ribavirin Dosage Interfering agents (e.g., alcohol) Patient Age Race Weight Cirrhosis Hepatic steatosis HIV co-infection Pre-treatment expression of IFN- response genes IL28b

act of Genotype on SVR Rates PegIFN alfa-2b 1.5 µg/kg/wk + RBV 8 mg/day for 48 wks PegIFN alfa-2a 18 µg/wk + weight-based RBV (1 or 12 mg/d) for 48 wks 1 8 82 8 76 6 4 54 42 6 4 56 46 2 2 n = 511 348 163 n = 453 Overall Overall Genotype 1 Genotype 2/3 298 14 Genotype 1 Genotype 2/3 M, et al. Lancet. 21;358:958-965. Fried MW, et al. N Engl J Med. 22;347:975-982.

tterns of Virologic Response PegIFN alfa and RBV 7 Null Response* 6 5 4 Partial Response* 3 2 Relapse 1 Undetectable RVR EVR ETR SVR -8-4 -2 4 8 12 16 2 24 32 4 48 52 6 72 Wks After Start of Therapy bset of Nonresponse

l Kinetics and Outcome Importance of Rapid logic Response Virologic Response (%) 1 8 6 4 2 RNA Status Wk 4 Wk 12 Wk 24 91 91 Neg Neg Neg 94 72 > 2 log Neg Neg 9 6 < 2 log Neg Neg 86 48 > 2 log > 2 log Neg 9 43 < 2 log > 2 log Neg PegIFN alfa-2a + RBV (N = 453) ETR SVR 13 2 Any Pos Pos ted from Journal of Hepatology, 43, Ferenci P, et al, Predicting sustained virological responses in chronic hepatitis C ts treated with peginterferon alfa-2a (4 KD)/ribavirin, 425-433, 25, with permission from Elsevier. ww.sciencedirect.com/science/journal/1688278

at are Genome wide association ns (GWAS)? Responders Non-responders SNP C or T Pharmacogenetic Analysis of the rs1297986 C allele

R by genotypes of rs1297986 on et al, AASLD 29, oral (LB5); Nature Sept. 29; 461: 399-41

Multivariate Analysis of Baseline Predictors of SVR (Genotype 1 HCV) ITT analysis of patients from IDEAL study who consented to genetic testing, regardless of adherence level dictor Adjusted Odds Ratio (95% CI) P Value 97986 CC 5.2 (4.1-6.7) <.1 RNA level 6, IU/mL 3.1 (2.3-4.1) <.1 te vs black 2.8 (2.-4.) <.1 anic vs black 2.1 (1.3-3.6).41 AVIR F-F2 2.7 (1.8-4.) <.1 ting blood sugar < 5.6 mmol/l 1.7 (1.3-2.2) <.1 pson AJ, et al. Gastroenterology. 21;139:12-129.

HCV RNA decline in relation to IL28b in Genotype 1 patients under treament Median HCV RNA Reduction (log 1 IU/mL) Weeks 2 4 6 8 1 12-1 -2-3 -4-5 -6-7 TT CT CC pson A et al. Gastroenterology 21

New Drugs for Hepatitis C Thompson A et al J of Hepatol 29

Types of drugs Type of drugs Genetic Barrier/ AV Efficacy Other Protease Inhibitor Low/ High Only Gen 1 lymerase Inhibitor Nucleoside Analog High / Low Few in develop All genotypes ymerase Inhibitor Non Nucleo Low/ Medium Genotype 1 Ciclofilin Inhibitor No/ Low Charlton et al AASLD 21.

oceprevir (BOC) is a linear peptidomimetic ketoamide serine NS3 protease inhibitor Effective against Genotype 1 Demonstrated activity in treatment naïve and experienced populations in phase 2 clinical trials

SPRINT 2: Study Design l 3 Week 4 Week 28 Week 48 Week 72 PR lead-in PR + Placebo Follow-up PR lead-in PR + Boceprevir TW 8-24 HCV-RNA Undetectable Follow-up TW 8-24 HCV-RNA Detectable PR + Placebo Follow-up PR lead-in PR + Boceprevir Follow-up eron (P) administered subcutaneously at 1.5 µg/kg once weekly, plus ribavirin (R) using weight based 6-14 mg/day in a divided daily dose ir dose of 8 mg thrice daily

Baseline Characteristics Cohort 1 (Non-black) Cohort 2 (Black) Arm 1: 48 P/R N = 311 Arm 2: BOC RGT N = 316 Arm 3: BOC/ PR48 N = 311 Arm 1: 48 P/R N = 52 Arm 2: BOC RGT N = 52 Arm 3: BOC/ PR48 N = 55 n age (years) 48 49 49 51 52 51 (%) 55 63 6 67 56 6 on (%) rth America 65 72 7 98 98 95 rope 32 25 27 2 2 5 mean (SD) 27 (5) 28 (5) 27 (5) 28 (4) 29 (5) 31 (6) subtype (%)* 6 62 63 79 75 73 36 35 33 17 25 24 RNA level, IU/mL (%) 92 91 93 1 94 96 AVIR F3/F4 (%) 7 8 12 2 15 11 ing performed by NS5B sequencing (Virco, Mechelen, Belgium)

RINT 2: SVR and Relapse Rates (ITT) 4 125 311 p <.1 p <.1 23 37 162 67 68 211 316 213 311 9 8 21/232 18/23 48 P/R BOC RGT BOC/PR48 Non-Black Patients SVR* Relapse Rate % Patients 1 8 6 4 2 p =.44 23 12 52 p =.4 42 22 14 52 12 2/14 3/25 53 17 48 P/R BOC RGT BOC/PR48 Black Patients 29 55 6 35 efined as undetectable HCV RNA at the end of the follow-up period. The 12-week post-treatment HCV RNA level was used if the 24-week postvel was missing (as specified in the protocol). A sensitivity analysis was performed counting only patients with undetectable HCV RNA d at 24 weeks post-treatment and the SVR rates for Arms 1, 2 and 3 in Cohort 1 were 39% (122/311), 66% (27/316) and 68% (21/311), and in Cohort 2 were 21% (11/52), 42% (22/52) and 51% (28/55), respectively.

SVR Based on Week 4 PR Lead-In in Non-Black Patients 1 log 1 HCV RNA decline from baseline <1 log 1 HCV RNA decline from baseline 52 121 234 5 82 82 187 228 29 21 73 178 218 39 31 79 Boceprevir Resistance-associated Variants*: 1 log 1 decline: BOC RGT: 4% (9/232) BOC/PR48: 4% (9/231) < 1 log 1 decline: BOC RGT: 47% (45/95) BOC/PR48: 35% (33/94) 3/62 48 P/R BOC RGT BOC/PR48 previr resistance-associated variants determined with population sequencing

Rationale for Lead-in Phase 4 weeks of PegIFN alfa-2b and ribavirin Achievement of steady-state drug levels Alpha interferon-mediated immune system activation Lower HCV burden May reduce the emergence of viral resistance by decreasing the pool of pre-existing viral quasi-species

oceprevir: Adverse Events and Discontinuations Anemia and dysgeusia reported more frequently in BOC arms vs control in SPRINT-2 [1-2] come erse event, % 4-Wk PR + Response- Guided BOC/PR (n = 368) 4-Wk PR + 44-Wk BOC/PR (n = 366) 48-Wk PR (n = 363) emia [1] 49 49 29 EPO use 41 46 21 sgeusia [2] 37 43 18 ontinuations due to 12 16 16 erse events, % [1] emia [1] 2 2 1 1. Poordad F, et al. AASLD 21.

TELAPREVIR - ADVANCE PR48 (Control) Peg-IFN + RBV T12/PR24 (or 48) Telaprevir + Peg-IFN + RBV Peg-IFN + RBV ervr Yes No No further treatment Peg-IFN/RBV 24 additional weeks T8/PR24 (or 48) Telaprevir + Peg-IFN + RBV Peg-IFN + RBV 4* 12 24 36 48 Weeks * Stopping rule time point for Telaprevir ervr = extended RVR, undetectable at W4 and 12

Efficacy Results from ADVANCE SVR Results (Intent to Treat Analysis) Patients with SVR (%) The SVR rates observed in the two telaprevir-based treatment arms were statistically significant when compared to the control arm (p<.1) AASLD 21

ADVANCE: SVR Rates in Patients Who Qualified For 24 Weeks of Therapy 57% and 58% of patients qualified for 24 weeks of therapy (assessment at Week 4) in 8-wk and 12-wk TVR arms, respectively 1 89 83 8 SVR (%) 6 4 2 n/n = 171/27 189/212 8-wk TVR/PR + 16/4-wk PR 12-wk TVR/PR + 12/36-wk PR

ADVANCE: Response Rates According to Race/Cirrhosis 1 8 8-wk TVR/PR + 16/4-wk PR 12-wk TVR/PR + 12/36-wk PR 48-wk PR 58 62 25 SVR (%) 6 4 2 53 62 33 n/n = 23/4 16/26 7/28 n/n = 45/85 45/73 24/73 Blacks Bridging fibrosis/cirrhosis

laprevir: Discontinuations Discontinuations due to adverse events in Phase III ADVANCE: come, % 8-Wk TVR/PR + 16/4-Wk PR (n = 364) ontinuation of TVR/placebo due to 12-Wk TVR/PR + 12/36-Wk PR (n = 363) 48-Wk PR (n = 361) 7 11 1 ontinuation of all drugs due to AEs 8 7 4 emia 3.3.8.6 son IM, et al. AASLD 21. Abstract 211.

egifn alfa2 and Ribavirin in treatment of hronic Hepatitis C 1 Proportion of Non Response 8 6 58% 54% 4 2 α2b α2a 18% α2b 24% α2a Genotype 1 Genotype 2 and 3 Manns et al. Lancet 21 Fried et al N Eng J Med

dy 17: TVR/PR Retreatment of Pts With PR lure in PROVE 1/2/3 Trials 1 97 8 75 SVR (%) 6 4 59 37 55 2 N = 177 n = 51 n = 29 n = 8 n = 29 Total Prior Null Response Prior Partial Response Prior Breakthrough Prior Relapse T, et al. EASL 21. Abstract 4. Graphic reproduced with permission.

Study Arms and Dosing Regimen ol R Week 4 Week 36 Week 48 Week 72 PR lead-in PR + Placebo Follow-up Week 12 futility TW 8 HCV-RNA Undetectable Follow-up C T 62 PR lead-in PR + Boceprevir TW 8 HCV-RNA Detectable/ TW 12 Undetectable PR + placebo Follow-up / 8 1 PR lead-in PR + Boceprevir Follow-up -RNA measured by the Cobas TaqMan assay (Roche). Patients with detectable HCV-RNA (LLD=9.3 L) at week 12 were considered treatment failures. interferon (P) administered subcutaneously at 1.5 µg/kg once weekly, plus Ribavirin (R) g weight based dosing of 6-14 mg/day in a divided daily dose previr dose of 8 mg thrice daily

POND-2 SVR and Relapse Rates tion to treat population % of Patients 1 8 6 4 2 p <.1 p <.1 59 32 21 66 15 12 SVR Relapse Rate 17 8 8 25 95 162 17 111 17 161 14 121 PR 48 BOC RGT BOC/PR48 SVR rates in BOC RGT and BOC/PR48 arm not statistically different (OR, 1.4; 95% CI [.9, 2.2]) ek HCV RNA level used if 24-week post-treatment level was missing. A sensitivity analysis where g data was considered as non-responder, SVR rates for Arms 1, 2 and 3 were 21% (17/8), 58% 2) and 66% (16/161), respectively.

by Week 8 HCV RNA Response Intention to Treat lation SVR (%) 1 8 6 4 2 1 12 Undetectable HCV RNA at Week 8 Detectable HCV RNA at Week 8 86 88 4 43 46% of patients in BOC RGT arm were eligible for shorter therapy ~6 times as many patients on BOC regimens (46-52%) achieved undetectable HCV RNA at week 8 compared to control (9%) 7 7 8 65 64 74 29 72 74 84 3 7 PR 48 BOC BOC/PR48 RGT

R by Week 4 PR Lead-In Response 1 8 73 79 6 33 34 4 25 2 12 15 46 15 44 17 67 8 11 9 114 PR 48 BOC RGT BOC/PR48 Poorly Responsive to IFN <1 log 1 viral load decline at treatment week 4 PR 48 BOC RGT BOC/PR48 Responsive to IFN 1 log 1 viral load decline at treatment week 4

SPOND-2: Adverse Events Over tire Treatment Course Adverse events more common in BOC arms vs control Anemia and dysgeusia ome 4-Wk PR + Response- Guided BOC + PR (n = 162) 4-Wk PR + 44-Wk BOC + PR (n = 161) 48-Wk PR (n = 114) rse event, % [1] emia 43 46 2 sgeusia 43 45 11

In Vitro resistance to Protease (A) and Polymerase (B) Inhibitors

Combination of two oral drugs in HCV G-1Patients ucleoside Polymerase (R7128) and Protease (R7227) Inhibitor e EJ et al. EASL 29

Summary Combination of Protease Inhibitors with PEG-IFN and RBV will increase SVR in genotype 1 patients from 4% to 6-7% Relapse rate decline to 5-1% Treatment duration may be shorten for a proportion of patients Discontinuation rates may increase due to AEs A new era in HCV therapy starts