Utilizing the NIH Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System

Similar documents
PROMIS Overview: Development of New Tools for Measuring Health-related Quality of Life and Related Outcomes in Patients with Chronic Diseases

Contents. What is item analysis in general? Psy 427 Cal State Northridge Andrew Ainsworth, PhD

PHYSICAL FUNCTION A brief guide to the PROMIS Physical Function instruments:

The Future of Measuring Patient-Reported Outcomes in Rheumatology

The Origins and Promise of PROMIS Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System

Item Response Theory. Steven P. Reise University of California, U.S.A. Unidimensional IRT Models for Dichotomous Item Responses

RARE DISEASE WORKSHOP SERIES Improving the Clinical Development Process. Disclaimer:

For more information: Quality of Life. World Health Organization Definition of Health

Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQoL)

Varying the item format improved the range of measurement in patient-reported outcome measures assessing physical function

PROMIS ANXIETY AND KESSLER 6 MENTAL HEALTH SCALE PROSETTA STONE ANALYSIS REPORT A ROSETTA STONE FOR PATIENT REPORTED OUTCOMES

PROSETTA STONE ANALYSIS REPORT A ROSETTA STONE FOR PATIENT REPORTED OUTCOMES PROMIS PEDIATRIC ANXIETY AND NEURO-QOL PEDIATRIC ANXIETY

PROMIS PAIN INTERFERENCE AND BRIEF PAIN INVENTORY INTERFERENCE

PROMIS DEPRESSION AND CES-D

PROSETTA STONE ANALYSIS REPORT A ROSETTA STONE FOR PATIENT REPORTED OUTCOMES PROMIS SLEEP DISTURBANCE AND NEURO-QOL SLEEP DISTURBANCE

Table of Contents. Preface to the third edition xiii. Preface to the second edition xv. Preface to the fi rst edition xvii. List of abbreviations xix

PROMIS DEPRESSION AND NEURO-QOL DEPRESSION

PROSETTA STONE ANALYSIS REPORT A ROSETTA STONE FOR PATIENT REPORTED OUTCOMES

PROMIS ANXIETY AND MOOD AND ANXIETY SYMPTOM QUESTIONNAIRE PROSETTA STONE ANALYSIS REPORT A ROSETTA STONE FOR PATIENT REPORTED OUTCOMES

Ware NIH Lecture Handouts

PROSETTA STONE ANALYSIS REPORT A ROSETTA STONE FOR PATIENT REPORTED OUTCOMES PROMIS GLOBAL HEALTH-PHYSICAL AND VR-12- PHYSICAL

PROSETTA STONE ANALYSIS REPORT A ROSETTA STONE FOR PATIENT REPORTED OUTCOMES

USE OF DIFFERENTIAL ITEM FUNCTIONING (DIF) ANALYSIS FOR BIAS ANALYSIS IN TEST CONSTRUCTION

PROSETTA STONE METHODOLOGY A ROSETTA STONE FOR PATIENT REPORTED OUTCOMES

ANXIETY A brief guide to the PROMIS Anxiety instruments:

ABOUT PHYSICAL ACTIVITY

Instruments Available for Use in Assessment Center

The promise of PROMIS: Using item response theory to improve assessment of patient-reported outcomes

Sensitivity of alternative measures of functioning and wellbeing for adults with sickle cell disease: comparison of PROMIS to ASCQ-Me

Using the Rasch Modeling for psychometrics examination of food security and acculturation surveys

Measuring Patient Health with PROMIS : Applications for Social Integration Research and Care

Universally-Relevant vs. Disease-Attributed Scales

GLOBAL HEALTH. PROMIS Pediatric Scale v1.0 Global Health 7 PROMIS Pediatric Scale v1.0 Global Health 7+2

PSYCHOLOGICAL STRESS EXPERIENCES

Quality of Life. The assessment, analysis and reporting of patient-reported outcomes. Third Edition

Richard C. Gershon, PhD.

What Does a PROMIS T-score Mean for Physical Function?

Patient Reported Outcomes in Clinical Research. Overview 11/30/2015. Why measure patientreported

COGNITIVE FUNCTION. PROMIS Pediatric Item Bank v1.0 Cognitive Function PROMIS Pediatric Short Form v1.0 Cognitive Function 7a

Challenges and Opportunities for Using Common PRO Measures in Comparative Effectiveness Research

INTRODUCTION TO ASSESSMENT OPTIONS

Psychometric Evaluation of Joint-Specific Patient- Reported Outcome Measures Before and After Total Knee Replacement: A Dissertation

SLEEP DISTURBANCE ABOUT SLEEP DISTURBANCE INTRODUCTION TO ASSESSMENT OPTIONS. 6/27/2018 PROMIS Sleep Disturbance Page 1

Building Evaluation Scales for NLP using Item Response Theory

Developing and Testing Survey Items

Introduction to Item Response Theory

PHYSICAL STRESS EXPERIENCES

MEANING AND PURPOSE. ADULT PEDIATRIC PARENT PROXY PROMIS Item Bank v1.0 Meaning and Purpose PROMIS Short Form v1.0 Meaning and Purpose 4a

Questionnaire Development and Testing. Barbara J. Stussman Survey Statistician NIH/NCCAM

Questionnaire Development and Testing. Acknowledgments. Outline of Lecture. Barbara J. Stussman Survey Statistician NIH/NCCAM

John E. Ware Jr. 1,2*, Barbara Gandek 1,2, Rick Guyer 1 and Nina Deng 2,3

ABOUT SMOKING NEGATIVE PSYCHOSOCIAL EXPECTANCIES

Description of components in tailored testing

The Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information

GENERAL SELF-EFFICACY AND SELF-EFFICACY FOR MANAGING CHRONIC CONDITIONS

IN A RECENT AMERICAN Congress of Rehabilitation

Patient Reported Outcomes (PROs) Tools for Measurement of Health Related Quality of Life

Item Analysis: Classical and Beyond

Journal of Clinical Epidemiology 63 (2010) 1179e1194

Adaptive Testing With the Multi-Unidimensional Pairwise Preference Model Stephen Stark University of South Florida

Smoking Social Motivations

PROMIS User Manual (Version 1.1)

Initial Report on the Calibration of Paper and Pencil Forms UCLA/CRESST August 2015

Fundamental Concepts for Using Diagnostic Classification Models. Section #2 NCME 2016 Training Session. NCME 2016 Training Session: Section 2

Correspondence of Performance Based Physical Tests and PROMIS Physical Function Scores in Community Dwelling Elderly

UvA-DARE (Digital Academic Repository)

Using Analytical and Psychometric Tools in Medium- and High-Stakes Environments

Danish translation of a physical function item bank from the Patient-Reported Outcome Measurement Information System (PROMIS)

PROMIS: What is it, Why Use it, and How to Advance the Mission of Integrative Oncology

Sources of Comparability Between Probability Sample Estimates and Nonprobability Web Sample Estimates

INTRODUCTION TO ASSESSMENT OPTIONS

Development and Validation of Patient-Reported Outcome Measures for Sleep Disturbance and Sleep-Related Impairments

The Use of Unidimensional Parameter Estimates of Multidimensional Items in Adaptive Testing

Turning Output of Item Response Theory Data Analysis into Graphs with R

FATIGUE. A brief guide to the PROMIS Fatigue instruments:

Questionnaire Development and Testing Barbara J. Stussman Survey Statistician NIH/NCCAM

Differential Item Functioning

Author's response to reviews

References. Embretson, S. E. & Reise, S. P. (2000). Item response theory for psychologists. Mahwah,

Outcome measurement in the field of adult communication

3/5/2014. New Research Initiatives to Improve QoL of Persons with SCI Across the Globe. What Are the SCI International Datasets?

A 37-item shoulder functional status item pool had negligible differential item functioning

Health and Quality of Life Outcomes 2013, 11:210

PAIN INTERFERENCE. ADULT ADULT CANCER PEDIATRIC PARENT PROXY PROMIS-Ca Bank v1.1 Pain Interference PROMIS-Ca Bank v1.0 Pain Interference*

Psychometrics for Beginners. Lawrence J. Fabrey, PhD Applied Measurement Professionals

A Comparison of Several Goodness-of-Fit Statistics

PROMIS Sexual Function and Satisfaction. Manual

Information for Users

AN ANTICIPATED FEATURE of contemporary patientreported

Termination Criteria in Computerized Adaptive Tests: Variable-Length CATs Are Not Biased. Ben Babcock and David J. Weiss University of Minnesota

A Broad-Range Tailored Test of Verbal Ability

Comparability Study of Online and Paper and Pencil Tests Using Modified Internally and Externally Matched Criteria

André Cyr and Alexander Davies

NIH Public Access Author Manuscript Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). Author manuscript; available in PMC 2014 October 01.

By Hui Bian Office for Faculty Excellence

Psychometric Details of the 20-Item UFFM-I Conscientiousness Scale

Computerized Mastery Testing

Psychological testing

Purpose of Workshop. Faculty. Culturally Sensitive Research. ISOQOL Workshop 19 Oct 2005

Transcription:

www.nihpromis.org/ Utilizing the NIH Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Thelma Mielenz, PhD Assistant Professor, Department of Epidemiology Columbia University, Mailman School of Public Health 1

Broad Objectives of PROMIS Develop and test a large bank of items measuring patientreported outcomes Create a computerized adaptive testing (CAT) system that allows for efficient, psychometrically robust assessment of patient-reported outcomes in clinical trial research involving a wide range of chronic diseases Create a publicly available system that can be added to and modified periodically and that allows clinical researchers to access a common repository of items and computerized adaptive tests (Objectives from: http://www.nihpromis.org/web%20pages/history.aspx Assessed: 01/19/11) 2

(From: http://www.nihpromis.org/web%20pages/domain%20framework.aspx Assessed 1/19/11. 3

(From: http://www.nihpromis.org/measures/domainframework1#pb Assessed 10/30/13) 4

PROMIS History (From: http://www.nihpromis.org/documents/promis_the_first_four_years.pdf Assessed 10/30/13) 5

Classical Test Theory Scale is the unit of analysis High score the person is higher on the trait Low score the person is lower on the trait Item Response Theory Item is the unit of analysis Person endorses better rating on hard items the person is higher on the trait Person endorses worse rating on easy items the person is lower on the trait (Modified From: http://www.nihpromis.org/lists/assessment%20center%20link/attachments/4/irt- _CAT_Workshop_7-17-08%5B1%5D.pdf Accessed: 01/19/10) 6

COMMON IRT MODELS IRT Model Response Format (i.e., dichotomous or polytomous) IRT Model Parameters (discrimination and difficulty) 1PL dichotomous discrimination = and difficulty varies 2PL dichotomous discrimination varies and difficulty varies 3PL dichotomous discrimination, difficulty and guessing vary GRM polytomous discrimination varies across items and difficulty varies Streiner and Norman 2008 p. 304-309 7

2 ASSUMPTION OF ITEM RESPONSE THEORY 1. Data are unidimensional: Items tap only one trait or ability 2. Local independence: Probability of answering any item in a positive direction unrelated to probability of answering any other item positively 8

If the assumptions are met, then... Subject s performance on a test can be predicted by a set of factors called traits (theta) Subject s performance on any item and the theta can be described by an item characteristic curve 9

Information Standard Error Example of Item Information Functions and Standard Error Curves. 35 30 Information Standard Error 0.9 0.8 25 0.7 0.6 20 0.5 15 0.4 10 0.3 0.2 5 0.1 0-3 -2-1 0 1 2 3 Theta 0 10 Figure 2 from Mielenz et al. Arthritis 2010

PROMIS Instructional Videos Conceptual Introduction to Item Response Theory The video below connects to a series of six training videos item response theory developed by Karon F. Cook (Northwestern University). The six videos are: Part 1. The Logic of IRT Scoring Part 2. IRT Is a Probability Model Part 3. Plotting Along: How item responses are related to person and item characteristics Part 4. Understanding Item Parameters: Difficulty and Discrimination Part 5. Information: A Better Measure of Measurement Precision Part 6. Applications of Item Response Theory (From: http://www.nihpromis.org/about/instructional Assessed 10/30/13) 11

Item Response Theory and Computer- Adaptive Testing Reduces the amount of time required to complete assessments and increases precision by asking only those questions that are relevant to the person s functional level. In an adaptive test, as the person responds to items, revised estimates of functional levels are estimated, and then subsequent items for administration are chosen accordingly. Computer-adaptive testing (CAT) employs an algorithm that selects items directly tailored to the person, and shortens or lengthens the test to achieve either the desired precision or a preassigned item stopping rule. Item response theory (IRT) methods are used to create hierarchically ordered item banks, and then CAT software algorithms select items to match the person s functional level. Haley et al. J Clin Epidemiol 2006;59:1174-82. 12

CAT process.. 1. Item Bank 2. Select an Item 3. Administer the Item go 6. Generate a Functional Score stop 5. Apply Stop Rules 4. Score Calculation Source: Alan Jette 13

Steps involved in creating a CAT 1 Specify construct 2 Develop item pool 3 Evaluate and modify pool (clean the pool) 4 Assessment properties of measure (IRT fit) 5 Create item bank and short forms 6 Calibrate to IRT model 7 Test for differential item functioning (DIF) 8 Starting and stopping rules Lecture by: Karon F. Cook, PhD, Dept. of Rehab. Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA March 10, 2011 14

PROMIS Qualitative Item Review 1 Identification of items 2 Item classification and selection 3 Creation of items 4 Item revision 5 Focus group studies 6 Cognitive interviews From DeWalt DA, Rothrock N, Yount S, Stone AA. Evaluation of Item Candidates: The PROMIS Qualitative Item Review. Medical Care; 2007(5):S12-S21. 15

Identification of items PROMIS began by depositing items into an item library from well-established instruments and from inclusive searches Thousands of items relevant to the domains PROMIS was trying to measure were selected For each item the instructions, the stem, the response options, the time frame, and the instrument of origin was documented http://www.nihpromis.org 16

Expert Review: Item Classification, Selection, Creation and Revision In order to sort the thousands of items, they were placed in common bins by the content of their stem and winnowed out if they were deemed redundant or inferior to alternative items in the same bin. Items were then reviewed and revised to: 1) be consistent in the style of questions, 2) meet the literacy requirements (6 th grade level) and 3) be consistent in set of response options and timeframes. http://www.nihpromis.org 17

Focus Group Studies have 2 aims 1) to confirm the definitions and identify common language related to the domain and 2) to identify important gaps for future PROMIS item banks http://www.nihpromis.org 18

Cognitive Interviews To identify potentially problematic items and response scales and help to clarify items that were not easily understood and answered PROMIS used a retrospective verbal probing technique where a participant completes a paper and pencil version of the measure followed by an interviewer asking probes for the basis for the response. http://www.nihpromis.org 19

Developing the PROMIS Physical Function Item Bank In PROMIS, the Physical Function latent trait is defined as the "ability to carry out various activities that require physical capability, ranging from self-care (basic activities of daily living (ADL)) to more-vigorous activities that require increasingdegrees of mobility, strength, or endurance" [http://www.nihpromis.org/]. 1 1. Bruce B, Fries J, Ambrosini D, Lingala B, Gandek B, Rose M and Ware J. Better assessment of physical function: item improvement is neglected but essential. Arth Res&Ther 2009, 11:R191. 2. Rose M, Bjorner J, Becker J, Fries J, Ware J. Evaluation of a preliminary physical function item bank supported the expected advantages of the PROMIS. J Clin Epi 2008, 61:17-33. 20

21 Bruce et al. 2009

Item Identification HAQ: Health Assessment Questionniare WOMAC: Western Ontario and McMaster Universities osteoarthritis index SF-36 SIP: Sickness Impact Profile 22

igure 3. Measurement Precision in Relationship to Theta 23 Rose et al. 2008

PROMIS Assessment Center http://www.assessmentcenter.net/ Create a publicly available system that can be added to and modified periodically and that allows clinical researchers to access a common repository of items and computerized adaptive tests (Objectives from: http://www.nihpromis.org/web%20pages/history.aspx Assessed: 01/19/11 24

PROMIS Instructional Videos What is PROMIS and PROMIS Instruments The video below connects to a playlist of six training webinars on PROMIS, PROMIS instruments and Assessment Center, developed by Nan Rothrock (Northwestern University). The six videos are: Part 1. What is PROMIS? Part 2. PROMIS Instruments Part 3. What is CAT? Part 4. PROMIS Instrument Development Part 5. PROMIS Instrument Reliability and Validity Part 6. Introduction to Assessment Center (From: http://www.nihpromis.org/about/instructional Assessed 10/30/13) 25

(From: http://www.nihpromis.org/about/instructional Assessed 10/30/13) 26

https://www.assessmentcenter.net/ 27

(From: http://www.nihpromis.org/about/instructional Assessed 10/30/13) 28

(From: http://www.nihpromis.org/about/instructional Assessed 10/30/13) 29

30

31

32

33

34

35

36

37

38

39

How do I score PROMIS instruments? CATs are scored as they are administered by Assessment Center. A theta estimate is calculated after each response. Short forms and Profiles are scored by Assessment Center after the instrument has been completed. Scoring instructions for short forms are also available on the Assessment Center homepage under the Scoring Manual hyperlink T-score metric Mean =50 SD = 10 Most PROMIS US General (note: not necessarily healthy) Population (from the 2000 Census) NIH effort called Prosetta Stone (www.prosettastone.org) which allows a researcher to transform scores (via score transformation tables) from other commonly used PROs measures to the PROMIS metric From: Training webinars on PROMIS, PROMIS instruments and Assessment Center, developed by Nan Rothrock (Northwestern University) and http://www.assessmentcenter.net/documents/faq.pdf, Accessed: 10/30/2013 40

Lessons Learned Server certifications from your own institution to use the PROMIS Assessment Center PROMIS AC Lite can be downloaded to a secure encrypted laptop for data collection and then transferred to your own institution s server Cannot use tablets with AC Lite For AC Lite, laptop needs certain hardware and software specifications 41

PROMIS Assessment Center Resources Assessment Center User Manual (pdf to download) Training workshops at Northwestern University Video Tutorials available on Assessment Center homepage: www.assessmentcenter.net Software application has a help function Help Desk help@assessmentcenter.net (877)283-0596 From: Training webinars on PROMIS, PROMIS instruments and Assessment Center, developed by Nan Rothrock (Northwestern University) and http://www.assessmentcenter.net/documents/faq.pdf, Accessed: 10/30/2013 42