Contrast-enhanced Breast MRI RSSA 2013

Similar documents
Pitfalls and Limitations of Breast MRI. Susan Orel Roth, MD Professor of Radiology University of Pennsylvania

Armed Forces Institute of Pathology.

Leonard M. Glassman MD

Mammographic imaging of nonpalpable breast lesions. Malai Muttarak, MD Department of Radiology Chiang Mai University Chiang Mai, Thailand

Feasibility of MRI-guided large-core-needle biopsy of suspiscious breast lesions at 3T

Successful Breast MRI Program : The ingredients

Computer-aided detection (CAD) for breast MRI: evaluation of efficacy at 3.0 T

Imaging in breast cancer. Mammography and Ultrasound Donya Farrokh.MD Radiologist Mashhad University of Medical Since

Categorical Classification of Spiculated Mass on Breast MRI

Breast MRI Update. Jeffrey C. Weinreb, MD, FACR Yale University School of Medicine

BI-RADS and Breast MRI. Kathy Borovicka, M.D. Thursday February 15, 2018

MRI in breast cancer: diagnosis and intervention. Dr Sue Barter Addenbrookes Hospital, Cambridge UK

Criteria of Malignancy. Evaluation Score

BREAST MRI. VASILIKI FILIPPI RADIOLOGIST CT MRI & PET/CT Departments Hygeia Hospital, Athens, Greece

MRI features of Triple-negative breast cancer: our experience.

Standard Breast Imaging Modalities. Lilian Wang, M.D. Breast Imaging Section Department of Radiology Northwestern Medicine

Here are examples of bilateral analog mammograms from the same patient including CC and MLO projections.

Value of the BI-RADS classification in MR-Mammography for diagnosis of benign and malignant breast tumors

Emerging Techniques in Breast Imaging: Contrast-Enhanced Mammography and Fast MRI

ROLE OF MRI IN SCREENING, DIAGNOSIS AND MANAGEMENT OF BREAST CANCER. B.Zandi Professor of Radiology

MR sin plass i brystkreftdiagnostikk, dagens anbefalinger og fremtidsperspektiver

Anyone can get breast cancer BREAST MRI BREAST CANCER. The incidence of getting breast cancer is 1:19 in Malaysia

EARLY DETECTION: MAMMOGRAPHY AND SONOGRAPHY

Triple-negative breast cancer: which typical features can we identify on conventional and MRI imaging?

National Diagnostic Imaging Symposium 2013 SAM - Breast MRI 1

S. Murgo, MD. Chr St-Joseph, Mons Erasme Hospital, Brussels

BI-RADS Update. Martha B. Mainiero, MD, FACR, FSBI Brown University Rhode Island Hospital

BREAST IMAGING and NEW IMAGING MODALITIES- A Surgeons view

WHICH INDICATION FOR BREAST MRI?

Lesion Imaging Characteristics Mass, Favoring Benign Circumscribed Margins Intramammary Lymph Node

Ultrasonography. Methods. Brief Description. Indications. Device-related Prerequisites. Technical Requirements. Evaluation Criteria

EARLY DETECTION: MAMMOGRAPHY AND SONOGRAPHY

ORIGINAL ARTICLE EVALUATION OF BREAST LESIONS USING X-RAY MAMMOGRAM WITH HISTOPATHOLOGICAL CORRELATION

MRI BI-RADS: How to make it out?

Amammography report is a key component of the breast

Rate of Malignancy in MRI-Detected Probably Benign (BI-RADS 3) Lesions

MEDICAL IMAGING AND BREAST DISEASE HOW CAN WE HELP YOU?

Triple Negative Breast Cancer: Clinical Presentation and Multimodality Imaging Characteristics

Breast Ultrasound: Improving Your Skills & Patient Care

Vacuum-assisted breast biopsy using computer-aided 3.0 T- MRI guidance: diagnostic performance in 173 lesions

Detailed Program of the second BREAST IMAGING AND INTERVENTIONS PROGRAM am am : Clinician s requirements from breast imaging

BREAST MRI. Elizabeth A. Rafferty, M.D. Avon Comprehensive Breast Center Massachusetts General Hospital Harvard Medical School

Large health system benefits from multiple scanners for breast MRI

NEW SUBTRACTION ALGORITHMS FOR EVALUATION OF BREAST LESIONS ON DYNAMIC CONTRAST ENHANCED MR MAMMOGRAPHY

Imaging the Symptomatic Patient. Avice M.O Connell MD,FACR,FSBI Professor of Imaging Sciences Director, Women s Imaging University of Rochester

MP Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Detection and Diagnosis of Breast Cancer

Index. C Calcifications fat necrosis 1, 61 fat necrosis 4, 69 nipple/peri-areolar involvement 1, 165

Dynamic contrast enhanced breast MRI at 7T and 3T: an intra individual comparison study

Breast MRI: Friend or Foe?

ORIGINAL PAPER. Background parenchymal enhancement in preoperative breast MRI

Using lesion washout volume fraction as a biomarker to improve suspicious breast lesion characterization

The role of apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) and relative ADC in the evaluation of breast masses

Breast Cancer. Most common cancer among women in the US. 2nd leading cause of death in women. Mortality rates though have declined

Pitfalls of Dynamic Contrast Enhanced MR Mammography (DCE-MRM) in Evaluation of Post-Biopsy Suspicious Breast Lesions

Breast Cancer. Saima Saeed MD

BREAST MRI. Elizabeth A. Rafferty, M.D. Avon Comprehensive Breast Center Massachusetts General Hospital Harvard Medical School

Breast Imaging: Multidisciplinary Approach. Madelene Lewis, MD Assistant Professor Associate Program Director Medical University of South Carolina

Ductal carcinoma in situ: ultrasound, mammography and MRI features with pathologic correlation

BI-RADS MRI: A Primer

Essentials of Clinical MR, 2 nd edition. 73. Urinary Bladder and Male Pelvis

Magnetic Resonance Imaging of the Female Breast

Can magnetic resonance imaging obviate the need for biopsy for microcalcifications?

Case Scenario 1 History and Physical 3/15/13 Imaging Pathology

RADIOLOGIC EVALUATION OF BREAST CANCER

Mammographic evaluation of palpable breast masses with pathological correlation: a tertiary care centre study in Nepal

RSNA, /radiol Appendix E1. Methods

ACR Breast MRI Accreditation Program - DRAFT

Case study 1. Rie Horii, M.D., Ph.D. Division of Pathology Cancer Institute Hospital, Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research

8/31/2016 HIDING IN PLAIN SITE, ARCHITECTURAL DISTORTIONS AND BREAST ASYMMETRIES ARCHITECTURAL DISTORTIONS ARCHITECTURAL DISTORTIONS

Ana Sofia Preto 19/06/2013

Case Scenario 1: This case has been slightly modified from the case presented during the live session to add clarity.

Breast Cancer Imaging

Breast Imaging Lexicon

CDIS: what's beyond microcalcifications? - Pictorial essay

Breast Imaging Update: Old Dog New Tricks

Original Research JOURNAL OF MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING 32: (2010)

When do you need PET/CT or MRI in early breast cancer?

Breast MRI, digital mammography and breast tomosynthesis: Comparison of three methods for early detection of breast cancer

Benign, Reactive and Inflammatory Lesions of the Breast

AMSER Case of the Month: November 2018

Patient Outcomes in Canceled MRI-Guided Breast Biopsies

Table 1. Classification of US Features Based on BI-RADS for US in Benign and Malignant Breast Lesions US Features Benign n(%) Malignant n(%) Odds

Case Scenario 1: This case has been slightly modified from the case presented during the live session to add clarity.

University of Washington Radiology Review Course: Strange and Specific Diagnoses. Case #1

Correlation between lesion type and the additional value of digital breast tomosynthesis

Compressive Re-Sampling for Speckle Reduction in Medical Ultrasound

Financial Disclosures

Throughout this policy, bracketed numbers link topics across multiple sections according to the indication numbers in the following list.

The role of MRI in assessment of asymmetrical breast densities

Case Report Tubular Carcinoma of the Breast: Advantages and Limitations of Breast Tomosynthesis

Ultrasound of the Breast BASICS FOR THE ORDERING CLINICIAN

New Imaging Modalities for better Screening and Diagnosis

BI-RADS Categorization As a Predictor of Malignancy 1

ACR MRI Accreditation Program. ACR MRI Accreditation Program Update. Educational Objectives. ACR accreditation. History. New Modular Program

Non-mass Enhancement on Breast MRI. Aditi A. Desai, MD Margaret Ann Mays, MD

Contrast-Enhanced Spectral Mammography

Tomosynthesis and breast imaging update. Dr Michael J Michell Consultant Radiologist King's College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust

Medical Policy An independent licensee of the Blue Cross Blue Shield Association

We are IntechOpen, the world s leading publisher of Open Access books Built by scientists, for scientists. International authors and editors

The Lactating Breast: Contrast-enhanced MR Imaging of Normal Tissue and Cancer 1

Transcription:

Contrast-enhanced Breast MRI RSSA 2013 Prof. dr. Maurice van den Bosch University Medical Center Utrecht, the Netherlands

Index 1) Breast cancer 2) Why MRI of the breast 3) Technique 4) Interpretation of breast MRI 5) Clinical indications 6) 7T High Resolution Breast MRI

Breast cancer - Most common type of cancer in women - Diagnosis: 10.000 women / year - Early detection favors prognosis - Different diagnostic strategies - Mammography is 1 st modality: - Sensitivity: 69-81% - Specificity: 40-60% - Decreased accuracy in dense breasts

Why MRI of the breast - MRI is extremely sensitive to enhancement by contrast regardless of breast density or composition - Tumor angiogenesis leads to preferential enhancement of cancers with intravenous contrast - Sensitivity of MRI for invasive tumors is high > 95%

Technique - Patient is prone positioned - Dedicated 8 channel phased-array breast coil - 1.5T or 3.0T closed bore magnet

Technique - Standard MRI protocol bilateral breast imaging: m SURVEY (MST) SynBody (Refscan) T1 FFE (Tra) T2 SPAIR (Tra) T1 DYN THRIVE (Tra) T1 3Dhr postgd (Tra)

Technique 3.0 T MRI protocol UMC Utrecht: T1 3D FFE DYN (axial) (FOV 340 mm, matrix 352x384 matrix, 1.0 mm slice thickness, gap: 0, TR/TE shortest/shortest, flip angle: 30, scan duration each dynamic scan: 50 sec, started after intravenous bolus injection of 0.1 mmol/kg Magnevist), 8 dynamic series

Interpretation of breast MRI American College of Radiology BI-RADS MRI lexicon Description of a mass: - Margin: smooth, irregular, spiculated - Shape: round, oval, lobulated, stellate - Enhancement: homogeneous, heterogeneous, rim - Associated findings: edema or skin thickening Lesion diagnosis working group, JMRI 1999,10:982-90

Interpretation of breast MRI American College of Radiology BI-RADS MRI lexicon Enhancement kinetics: - Initial enhancement (within the first 2 minutes): slow, medium or fast - Delayed phase: persistent, plateau, or washout

Interpretation of breast MRI Spiculated homogeneous enhancing mass, rapid initial enhancement followed by washout: BI-RADS MRI: V PA: invasive ductal carcinoma

Interpretation of breast MRI Homogeneous enhancing oval mass with smooth borders. Slow initial enhancement followed by persistent: BI-RADS MRI: II PA: fibroadenoma

Clinical indications 1) Screening of high risk women 2) Diagnosis of indeterminate breast lesions 3) Pre-operative staging of known breast cancer 4) Imaging of patients with positive axillary node 5) Evaluation of response to neo-adjuvant chemotherapy

Clinical indications Screening of high risk patient: PA: invasive adenoma carcinoma

Clinical indications Diagnosis of indeterminate mammographic lesion MRI-guided localization, PA: Fibroadenoma

Clinical indications Staging of known breast malignancy PA: skeletal metastasis: 2.3x1.5 cm

Clinical indications Positive axillary lymph node PA: invasive ductal carcinoma 6x5 mm

Clinical indications Response to neo-adjuvant chemotherapy Before 6 FEC After chemotherapy

Clinical indications Staging of known breast malignancy (MONET trial) PA: multicentric invasive ductal carcinoma

MONET Randomized Clinical Trial

MONET Randomized Clinical Trial Purpose: Does CE-MRI in addition to mammography/us in patients with non-palpable lesions improve breast cancer management

MONET Trial Methods - 418 women with nonpalpable 3-5 lesions were randomized - Group A: N=211 mammography, US, LCNB (routine care) - Group B: N=207 routine care + CE-MRI prior to biopsy - Patients with malignancy underwent surgery

MONET Trial Methods Primary endpoint: Rate of additional surgical procedures: a) Re-excisions b) Conversions to Mastectomy

MONET Results

MONET Results

MONET Results - The primary BCS rate was similar in both groups: 66% controls vs 68% MRI group - Number of re-excisions due to positive margins BCS 6/50 (12%) controls vs 18/53 (34%) MRI group (p=0.008) - The numbers of conversions to mastectomy did not differ

MONET Trial Conclusion MRI in addition to routine clinical care was paradoxically associated with an increased reexcision rate MRI should not be used routinely for preoperative work-up in these patients

MRI-guided biopsy - MRI can detect occult breast lesions - 10-20% of patients with breast cancer have multifocal disease - 15% of high risk patients have IEL s - Always second look ultrasound - MRI guided VAB has been developed to allow selective tissue sampling of MRI only lesions:

MRI-guided biopsy - MRI can detect occult breast lesions - 10-20% of patients with breast cancer have multifocal disease - 15% of high risk patients have IEL s - Always second look ultrasound - MRI guided VAB has been developed to allow selective tissue sampling of MRI only lesions:

MRI-guided biopsies

MRI-guided biopsies

New developments 7.0T High Field Breast Imaging: Promises: - Higher field strength results in linearly increased SNR - Higher SNR enables increased spatial resolution (DCIS) - Higher SNR can be exchanged for faster scanning techniques - More sensitive for phase changes (calcification detection)

7.0T Feasibility Study - We started a feasibility study comparing 3T with 7T - Included were women >18 yrs with BIRADS 4 or 5 mass lesions

7.0T Feasibility Study - Unilateral two channel breast coil

7.0T Feasibility Study - Scan protocol T1w_GRE dynamic (7:25min) 7x T1w GRE Injection of Gd after 1 st series FA 10, TR/TE 5.0/2.0 ms, FOV 160 3 mm 3 Voxel size 1.0x1.0x2.0 mm 3 Temporal resolution 63s T1w_GRE Highres (13:30min) FA 12, TR/TE 7.0/2.9 ms, FOV 120 3 mm 3 Voxel size 0.45x0.57x0.45 mm 3

7.0T Feasibility Study: methods Two radiologists Dynamic series - Image quality excellent / good / sufficient / insufficient - Lesion identification + BI-RADS-MRI High-resolution imaging - Added value none / increased reader confidence / change in interpretation / other Invasive ductal carcinoma

7.0T Feasibility Study: Results 20 women with 23 lesions BI-RADS 4 n=7 BI-RADS 5 n=16 19 malignant invasive ductal carcinoma n=12 invasive lobular carcinoma n=2 invasive ductulolubular carcinoma n=5 4 non-malignant cyst n=2 slerosis n=1 radial scar n=1

7.0T Feasibility Study: Case T1w GRE dynamic pre-contrast T1w GRE dynamic post-contrast T1w GRE high resolution BI-RADS-MRI V Pathology: IDC Enhancement (%) 500 450 400 350 300 250 200 150 100 50 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Dynamic series (no.)

7.0T Feasibility Study: Results Image quality dynamic series excellent n=1 (R1) n=0 (R2) good n=10 (R1) n=12 (R2) sufficient n=8 (R1) n=8 (R2) insufficient n=1 (R1) n=0 (R2) Lesion identification + BI-RADS-MRI analysis - All malignant lesions + 1 non-malignant lesion identified - 3 non-malignant lesions were not identified

7.0T Feasibility Study: Results HR scans R1 R2 None 12% (2/17) 29% (5/17) Increased confidence 88% (15/17) 59% (10/17) Change in interpretation 18% (3/17) 41% (7/17) Other 0% (0/17) 0% (0/17)

7.0T Feasibility Study: Challenges - B1 inhomogeneity (Spin echo imaging) - B0 inhomogeneity (Uneven fat-suppression) - Field of view (Unilateral imaging)

Conclusion - Clear indications for anatomical breast imaging at 3T - Imaging and biopsy should be available - Imaging at 7.0T: - Is feasible - High spatial resolution

Thank you for your attention