Risk factors for microvascular and macrovascular complications in men and women with type 2 diabetes

Similar documents
The target blood pressure in patients with diabetes is <130 mm Hg

Ischemic Heart and Cerebrovascular Disease. Harold E. Lebovitz, MD, FACE Kathmandu November 2010

ESM1 for Glucose, blood pressure and cholesterol levels and their relationships to clinical outcomes in type 2 diabetes: a retrospective cohort study

SCIENTIFIC STUDY REPORT

Metformin should be considered in all patients with type 2 diabetes unless contra-indicated

Optimizing risk assessment of total cardiovascular risk What are the tools? Lars Rydén Professor Karolinska Institutet Stockholm, Sweden

How to Reduce CVD Complications in Diabetes?

Epidemiology of Diabetes, Impaired Glucose Homeostasis and Cardiovascular Risk. Eberhard Standl

Welcome and Introduction

The Diabetes Link to Heart Disease

Scottish Diabetes Survey

Know Your Number Aggregate Report Single Analysis Compared to National Averages

Total risk management of Cardiovascular diseases Nobuhiro Yamada

Felix Vallotton Ball (1899) LDL-C management in Asian diabetes: moderate vs. high intensity statin --- a lesson from EMPATHY study

Diabetes Mellitus: A Cardiovascular Disease

Diabetes is a metabolic disorder primarily

Peripheral Arterial Occlusive Disease- The Challenge in patients with diabetes

Diabetes Day for Primary Care Clinicians Advances in Diabetes Care

Kidney and heart: dangerous liaisons. Luis M. RUILOPE (Madrid, Spain)

Individualized Treatment Goals for Optimal Long-Term Health Outcomes among Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus

Update on CVD and Microvascular Complications in T2D

Disclosures. Diabetes and Cardiovascular Risk Management. Learning Objectives. Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease

ESC GUIDELINES ON DIABETES AND CARDIOVASCULAR DISEASES

Know Your Number Aggregate Report Comparison Analysis Between Baseline & Follow-up

Diabetes Guidelines in View of Recent Clinical Trials Are They Still Applicable?

A study on clinical profile of acute coronary syndrome in type 2 diabetes mellitus patients with relevance to HbA1c

Chronic Benefit Application Form Cardiovascular Disease and Diabetes

A factorial randomized trial of blood pressure lowering and intensive glucose control in 11,140 patients with type 2 diabetes

Long-Term Care Updates

Diabetic Nephropathy. Objectives:

Why is Earlier and More Aggressive Treatment of T2 Diabetes Better?

Macrovascular Residual Risk. What risk remains after LDL-C management and intensive therapy?

Serum levels of galectin-1, galectin-3, and galectin-9 are associated with large artery atherosclerotic

Andrew Cohen, MD and Neil S. Skolnik, MD INTRODUCTION

Table S1. Characteristics associated with frequency of nut consumption (full entire sample; Nn=4,416).

Treatment to reduce cardiovascular risk: multifactorial management

The State of Play of Diabetes Indicators

Glycemic control a matter of life and death

Guidelines on cardiovascular risk assessment and management

The American Diabetes Association estimates

Diabetes: Staying Two Steps Ahead. The prevalence of diabetes is increasing. What causes Type 2 diabetes?

The Clinical Unmet need in the patient with Diabetes and ACS

ADVANCE post trial ObservatioNal Study

Diabetes Control and Complications in Public Hospitals in Malaysia

Risk Factors for Heart Disease

Complications of Diabetes mellitus. Dr Bill Young 16 March 2015

Survey Scottish Diabetes. Survey Monitoring Group

Diabetologia 9 Springer-Verlag 1991

Elevated Risk of Cardiovascular Disease Prior to Clinical Diagnosis of Type 2 Diabetes

Identification of subjects at high risk for cardiovascular disease

Relatively more atherogenic coronary heart disease risk factors in prediabetic women than in prediabetic men

The Metabolic Syndrome: Is It A Valid Concept? YES

Modelling Reduction of Coronary Heart Disease Risk among people with Diabetes

Type 2 diabetes is one of the most common

Obesity, Insulin Resistance, Metabolic Syndrome, and the Natural History of Type 2 Diabetes

Comparability of patient-reported health status: multi-country analysis of EQ-5D responses in patients with type 2 diabetes

NICE Indicator Programme. Consultation on proposed amendments to current QOF indicators

Diabetes and Cardiovascular Risk Management Denise M. Kolanczyk, PharmD, BCPS-AQ Cardiology

Diabetes Mellitus Aeromedical Considerations. Aviation Medicine Seminar Bucharest, Romania. 11 th to 15 th November 2013

A study of micro vascular complications and associated risk factors in newly diagnosed patients of type 2 diabetes mellitus

Managing Diabetes for Improved Health and Economic Outcomes

Practical Diabetes. Nic Crook. (and don t use so many charts) Kuirau Specialists 1239 Ranolf Street Rotorua. Rotorua Hospital Private Bag 3023 Rotorua

Complications of Diabetes: Screening and Prevention

NATIONAL INSTITUTE FOR HEALTH AND CARE EXCELLENCE General practice Indicators for the NICE menu

Diabetes Overview. How Food is Digested

Complications in IDDM are caused by elevated blood glucose level: The Stockholm Diabetes Intervention Study (SDIS) at 10-year follow up

Diabetes and Heart Disease. Sarah Alexander, MD, FACC Assistant Professor of Medicine Rush University Medical Center

The Burden of the Diabetic Heart

Ulster, Ireland. Submitted: 21 June 2009; Revised: 24 January 2010; Published: 13 September 2010 Petrazzuoli F, Soler JK, Buono N, Dobbs F

Diabetes Mellitus: Implications of New Clinical Trials and New Medications

Research. Prevalence of lower-extremity amputation among patients with diabetes mellitus: Is height a factor? Methods

Awareness of Hypertension, Risk Factors and Complications among Attendants of a Primary Health Care Center In Jeddah, Saudi Arabia

NATIONAL INSTITUTE FOR HEALTH AND CLINICAL EXCELLENCE

The problem of uncontrolled hypertension

Internet Journal of Medical Update

Soo LIM, MD, PHD Internal Medicine Seoul National University Bundang Hospital

How complicated is diabetes? Jonathan Shaw

Table 1 Baseline characteristics of 60 hemodialysis patients with atrial fibrillation and warfarin use

TUE Physician Guidelines Medical Information to Support the Decisions of TUE Committees Diabetes Mellitus DIABETES MELLITUS

Statin therapy in patients with Mild to Moderate Coronary Stenosis by 64-slice Multidetector Coronary Computed Tomography

Diabetes, Diet and SMI: How can we make a difference?

Appendix This appendix was part of the submitted manuscript and has been peer reviewed. It is posted as supplied by the authors.

Master class in preventive cardiology Focus on diabetes and cardiovascular disease Geneva April

Microvascular Disease in Type 1 Diabetes

Andrejs Kalvelis 1, MD, PhD, Inga Stukena 2, MD, Guntis Bahs 3 MD, PhD & Aivars Lejnieks 4, MD, PhD ABSTRACT INTRODUCTION. Riga Stradins University

Cardiovascular Risk Reduction and Other Co-Morbidities in Type 2 Diabetes

American Academy of Insurance Medicine

Diabetes and Heart Disease

(n=6279). Continuous variables are reported as mean with 95% confidence interval and T1 T2 T3. Number of subjects

The prevalance of type II diabetes mellitus and its cardiovascular risk factors in a general practice

Impaired glucose tolerance as a risk factor for stroke in a cohort of non-institutionalised people aged 70 years

Risk of mortality and adverse cardiovascular outcomes in type 2 diabetes: a comparison of patients treated with sulfonylureas and metformin

John J.P. Kastelein MD PhD Professor of Medicine Dept. of Vascular Medicine Academic Medial Center / University of Amsterdam

Normal Fasting Plasma Glucose and Risk of Type 2 Diabetes Diagnosis

ORIGINAL INVESTIGATION. Hemoglobin A 1c Level and Future Cardiovascular Events Among Women

Epidemiologic Measure of Association

2017 Employee Wellness Health Assessment Report

Strategies for the prevention of type 2 diabetes and cardiovascular disease

Östgren, Carl Johan; Lindblad, Ulf; Ranstam, Jonas; Melander, Arne; Råstam, Lennart

Information for people with diabetes. diabetes. glossary of. terms

Transcription:

ORIGINAL PAPER Risk factors for microvascular and macrovascular complications in men and women with type 2 diabetes Per Erik Wändell Family Medicine Stockholm, Karolinska Institutet, Huddinge, Sweden. Received March 1998. Accepted October 1998. Scand J Prim Health Care 1999;17:116 121. ISSN 0281-3432 Key words: cardiovascular disease, cross-sectional survey, non-in- sulin-dependent diabetes mellitus, primary health care, risk factors, Sweden. Objecti e To evaluate the importance of risk factors for microvascular and macrovascular complications, separated by sex, in type 2 diabetes. Design Cross-sectional surveys of diabetic patients registered with primary health services in 1995. Setting Three community health centres in Stockholm County. Subjects 407 subjects with type 2 diabetes in 1995. For 78 of these, data were also registered in 1992. Main outcome measures Odds ratio (OR) by logistic regression for risk factors predicting microvascular and macrovascular complications, for age and duration in years. Results For microvascular complications, the most important factors were in men the duration of diabetes (OR 1.13, p 0.001) and Both microvascular and macrovascular complications are well-known among diabetic patients (1,2). The relationship between microvascular complications in diabetes, i.e. retinopathy, nephropathy and neuropathy, and the level of metabolic control measured as HbA1c is firmly established, especially in type 1 diabetes (3). As regards macrovascular complications, the risk factors include high blood pressure, high serum total and LDL cholesterol, low serum HDL cholesterol and raised serum triglycerides, poor glucose control, smoking, high body-mass index (BMI) and fat distribution (4). However, there is some controversy regarding macrovascular complications, especially in type 2 diabetes, in relation to metabolic control. Some studies have shown a relationship between a high level of HbA1c and macrovascular comorbidity (5,6), while others have not (7). Meigs et al. (8) found that age, duration and hypertension in diabetic patients were associated with cardiovascular disease, while the HbA1c value was not. In the United Kingdom Prospective Diabetes Study (UKPDS) (9) intensive blood glucose control decreased the risk of microvascular complications but not macrovascular complications. In a recently published study, Yamamoto et al. in women the duration of diabetes (OR 1.08, p 0.001) and age (OR 1.04, p 0.05). For macrovascular complications, the most important factors were in men, age (OR 1.09, p 0.001) and hypertension (OR 4.85, p 0.001) and in women, age (OR 1.08, p 0.001) and duration of diabetes (OR 1.08, p 0.01). Conclusions Hypertension is more important among men and the duration of diabetes among women as risk factor for macrovascular complications in type 2 diabetes. Per Erik Wändell, MD, Family Medicine Stockholm, No um, SE- 141 57 Huddinge, Sweden. (10) found differences in the development of microangiopathy and macroangiopathy in type 2 diabetes, early onset and maternal inheritance being more important for the former and hyperlipidaemia, obesity and hypertension for the latter. In the UKPDS (11), a tight control of hypertension was found to reduce the risk of microvascular disease, as well as the risk of stroke and all diabetes-related death. With regard to sexual differences, these have been mostly described in connection with macrovascular complications. There is an increased risk of coronary heart disease in type 2 diabetes, twofold for men and fourfold for women (12). Diabetes increases the death rate from ischaemic heart disease in the USA by 9 10 times for women but by only 2 3 times for men (13). Thus, type 2 diabetes reduces the sexual difference in the overall relative risk (the ratio of men to women) of mortality from coronary heart disease (CHD) from 2.29 to 1.46 (14). The aim of this study was to assess the importance of risk factors, separated by sex, of microvascular and macrovascular complications in patients with type 2 diabetes.

Micro ascular and macro ascular complications in patients with type 2 diabetes 117 Table I. Disease characteristics of 407 patients with type 2 diabetes from Stockholm County in 1995, divided by sex. Values within parentheses are SDs if not otherwise stated. When figures are based on fewer than the total number of patients, the actual number is given. Only significant p-values are given. Men Women n=198 n=209 p-value Age (year) 66.1 (11.2) 70.1 (11.3) Duration (year) 8.3 (6.4) (n=192) 10.0 (7.0) (n=202) 0.013 Treatment regimen Diet only 47 (23.7%) 40 (19.1%) Tablets only 106 (53.5%) 114 (54.5%) Tablets+insulin 14 (7.1%) 19 (9.1%) Insulin 31 (15.7%) 36 (17.2%) fb-glucose (mmol/l) 8.6 (3.1) (n=185) 8.7 (2.8) (n=195) HbA1c (%-units) 7.5 (1.9) (n=135) 7.5 (1.8) (n=145) Cholesterol (mmol/l) 5.9 (1.2) (n=86) 6.2 (1.2) (n=89) LDL-cholesterol (mmol/l) 3.7 (1.1) (n=44) 3.6 (1.0) (n=31) HDL-cholesterol (mmol/l) 1.0 (0.3) (n=54) 1.3 (0.4) (n=42) LDL/HDL ratio 3.6 (1.4) (n=44) 2.9 (1.0) (n=31) 0.011 Triglycerides (mmol/l) 2.6 (1.5) (n=91) 2.7 (1.8) (n=89) Blood pressure (n=186) (n=194) Systolic (mmhg) 149.6 (20.5) 152.8 (19.5) Diastolic (mmhg) 81.7 (9.1) 81.6 (9.9) BMI 29.1 (4.9) (n=82) 29.5 (6.6) (n=79) Hypertension Diabetic complications 86/185 (46.5%) 125/201 (62.2%) 0.002 Retinopathy 48/134 (35.8%) 39/123 (31.7%) Nephropathy 33/151 (21.9%) 23/153 (15.0%) Neuropathy 57/94 (60.6%) 49/106 (46.2%) 0.042 Diabetic ulcer 14/196 (7.1%) 13/209 (6.2%) Atheromatous complications Heart disease 75/195 (38.5%) 76/209 (36.4%) Cerebrovascular disease 27/194 (13.9%) 39/209 (18.7%) Peripheral artery disease 22/195 (11.3%) 13/209 (6.2%) Smoking habits (n=104) (n=107) 0.007 Non-smokers 58 (50.9%) 76 (71.0%) Ex-smokers 27 (23.7%) 12 (11.2%) Smokers 29 (25.4%) 19 (17.8%) STUDY POPULATION AND METHODS Subjects The population in Stockholm County varies by geographic district as regards demographic and socioeconomic factors. Three community health centres (CHCs) were chosen as reflecting these differences (15). In 1995 the electronic medical records of 407 patients with type 2 diabetes 198 men and 209 women were studied. For 78 patients 30 men and 48 women data from 1992 were also obtainable. Medical data Data on the disease were extracted from the medical records kept by the CHCs. We noted general data and data of general interest for this particular study: the type of diabetes, treatment, duration, metabolic levels (HbA1c, and fasting blood glucose), hypertension (with actual value of blood pressure), diabetic and atheromatous complications. The patients classified as suffering from type 2 diabetes, according to the data in the medical records, were included. The upper reference level for HbA1c was 5.0% for two of the CHCs and 5.2% for the remaining one. Diabetic complications were registered regarding retinopathy, nephropathy, neuropathy and previous or present diabetic foot ulcers, and atheromatous complications regarding cardiac disease, cerebrovascular disorders, including transient ischaemic attacks, and peripheral artery disease. Non-vascular comorbidity was also noted. Statistics Calculations of statistical significance were performed using Pearson s correlation test for correlation between laboratory values, and Spearman s rank-correlation test for all other correlations. Analysis by

118 P. E. Wändell Table II. Univariate logistic regression regarding microvascular and macrovascular complications in 1995 for men with type 2 diabetes (n=198) with significant p-values shown (borderline values, i.e. values between 0.05 and 0.10, are given within parentheses). Age Duration Hypertension Ever smoked BMI Fasting blood Cholesterol LDL HDL LDL/HDL Triglycerides glucose 0.016 (0.068) All diabetic complications Retinopathy 0.011 Nephropathy Neuropathy 0.050 1 Diabetic foot ulcer 0.011 (0.077) (0.055) (0.054) All atheromatous complications 0.020 (0.051) Coronary heart disease (0.081) 0.037 Cerebrovascular disease 0.005 0.008 0.005 (0.083) 1 (0.059) (0.084) (0.052) Peripheral artery disease 0.022 0.013 (0.082) (0.091) 1 Negative correlation. logistic regression was performed as regards microvascular and macrovascular complications in relation to relevant risk factors, with odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) given. RESULTS The diabetic sample in 1995 The characteristics of the diabetes sample divided by sex are given in Table I. Men were younger, had a shorter diabetes duration, had lower HDL-cholesterol with a higher LDL/HDL ratio, had hypertension less often and neuropathy more often, and were more often smokers or ex-smokers than women. Risk factors for microvascular and macrovascular complications were tested by univariate logistic regression one by one for men and women, with the results shown in Tables II and III. The significant risk factors were then used in a model by multivariate logistic regression, with the results given in Tables IV and V. On looking at the subgroup of women in whom BMI was known (n= 46), this was the most important factor in predicting neuropathy (OR 1.11, 95% CI 1.00 1.23, p=0.045). The diabetic sample followed between 1992 and 1995 As regards correlation over time between 1992 and 1995, the correlation coefficients were for fasting blood glucose 0.44 (p 0.001), for HbA1c 0.52 (p 0.01), for total cholesterol 0.79 (p 0.001), and for triglycerides 0.53 (p 0.05). Logistic regression was also performed regarding these patients for microvascular and macrovascular complications in relation to metabolic level 1992 (n= 78). The blood glucose value in 1992 predicted overall diabetic complications in 1995 with OR 1.32 (95% CI 1.09 1.60, p=0.004), i.e. when the blood glucose value increased by one mmol/l the risk of any diabetic complication increased by 32%. On looking at the deterioration in diabetic complications, blood glucose value was also a significant factor, with OR 1.20 (95% CI 1.03 1.41, p=0.021). DISCUSSION The validity of this study is limited by the incomplete data in the medical records, with the effects of BMI, blood lipids and smoking habits possible to be evaluated only in subgroups. Thus, one important issue is whether the patients supplied with data are representative of the whole diabetic sample. As regards the level of recorded data, no differences were found between men and women. There were differences regarding this between the CHCs with more metabolic data, i.e. HbA1c and blood lipids, being

Micro ascular and macro ascular complications in patients with type 2 diabetes 119 Table III. Univariate logistic regression regarding microvascular and macrovascular complications in 1995 for women with type 2 diabetes (n=209) with significant p-values shown (borderline values, i.e. values between 0.05 and 0.10, are given within parentheses). Age Duration Ever smoked BMI Triglycerides All diabetic complications 0.003 (0.068) Retinopathy Nephropathy Neuropathy 0.037 0.045 Diabetic foot ulcer 0.015 All atheromatous complications (0.089) 1 Coronary heart disease 0.007 Cerebrovascular disease 0.002 0.008 (0.056) Peripheral artery disease 0.024 1 Negative correlation. recorded at the CHC with the youngest population (15). However, no differences were found between the CHCs in the numbers of patients on an acceptable or an unacceptable metabolic level. Besides, results from the entire diabetic sample regarding metabolic level, and microvascular and atheromatous complications were similar to those found in other studies from different parts of Sweden (15,16). Another remark is that hypertension among men was by far more important for macrovascular complications than blood cholesterol values and smoking habits, even in the subgroups where those could be evaluated. Thus, the high rate of missing data regarding some of the risk factors could not have been expected to affect the results as a whole, but of course limited the number of subjects in which these were evaluated. The predictive value of a current fb-glucose or HbA1c is limited by the relatively low correlation over time between fb-glucose and HbA1c. In contrast to this, the cholesterol showed a considerably higher correlation between the two occasions. The rate of hypertension was higher among diabetic women than men in this study, in contrast to a study from the south of Sweden by Hjelm et al. (17), but in accordance with a study from Finland by Kuusisto et al. (5). However, in the study by Hjelm et al., the diabetic patients were aged 20 64 years, with a mean age of around 50 years, while in the study by Kuusisto et al. the mean age of the Table IV. Potential risk factors for microvascular and macrovascular complications in men with type 2 diabetes (n=198). Multivariate analysis, using logistic regression. Duration and age by 1 year. Coefficient ( ) SE ( ) OR (95% CI) p-value Diabetic complications: Duration 0.124 0.031 1.13 (1.06 1.20) Retinopathy: Duration 0.245 0.053 1.28 (1.15 1.42) Hypertension 1.589 0.479 4.90 (1.92 12.53) 0.001 Nephropathy: Hypertension 1.952 0.495 7.04 (2.67 18.57) Foot ulcer: Duration 0.090 0.035 1.09 (1.02 1.17) 0.011 Atheromatosis: Age 0.082 0.018 1.09 (1.05 1.12) Hypertension 1.579 0.348 4.85 (2.45 9.59) Heart disease: Age 0.079 0.018 1.08 (1.04 1.12) Hypertension 1.412 0.357 4.11 (2.04 8.27) Cerebrovascular disease: Age 0.069 0.024 1.07 (1.02 1.12) 0.004 Hypertension 1.383 0.489 3.99 (1.53 10.39) 0.005 Peripheral artery disease: Age 0.051 0.022 1.05 (1.01 1.10) 0.022

120 P. E. Wändell Table V. Potential risk factors for microvascular and macrovascular complications in women with type 2 diabetes (n=209). Multivariate analysis, using logistic regression. Duration and age by 1 year. Coefficient ( ) SE ( ) OR (95% CI) p-value Diabetic complications: Duration 0.079 0.024 1.08 (1.03 1.13) 0.001 Age 0.036 0.015 1.04 (1.01 1.07) 0.014 Retinopathy: Duration 0.136 0.034 1.15 (1.07 1.22) Neuropathy: Duration 0.059 0.028 1.06 (1.00 1.12) 0.037 Foot ulcer: Duration 0.132 0.037 1.14 (1.06 1.23) Atheromatosis: Age 0.075 0.016 1.08 (1.04 1.11) Duration 0.073 0.024 1.08 (1.03 1.13) 0.003 Heart disease: Age 0.063 0.016 1.07 (1.03 1.10) Duration 0.045 0.023 1.05 (1.00 1.09) 0.046 Cerebrovascular disease: Age 0.057 0.020 1.06 (1.02 1.10) 0.005 Duration 0.054 0.025 1.06 (1.01 1.11) 0.034 Peripheral artery disease: Ever smoked 1.962 0.867 7.12 (1.30 38.94) 0.024 diabetic patients was on a similar level to that in the present study. The findings regarding diabetic complications, with the duration as the most important factor, especially for retinopathy, are to be expected. In men, correlation is also noted with hypertension for retinopathy and nephropathy. The UKPDS also showed that tight control of hypertension reduced microvascular complications by 37% (11). As regards macrovascular complications, diabetes seems to be more important for women than for men, according to the studies mentioned earlier (12 14). This was also confirmed by the Scottish heart-health study (18), in which sex differences were found regarding coronary heart disease and in which total cholesterol and blood pressure being more important for men, and triglycerides and diabetes for women. The findings in this study confirm the importance of hypertension in men, and diabetes in itself for women, for the atheromatous complications. Type 2 diabetes is still sometimes called the diabetes of age among laymen, thereby implying a less serious disease, and diabetes in the elderly may also be understated by doctors. But as the disease contributes to the increased rate of atheromatous disorders in the elderly, it cannot be disregarded at any age. As regards the correlation between metabolic control and later complications, the chances of detecting this were small, owing to the small size of the diabetic sample that could be followed over 3 years. A correlation was found between the fb-glucose values in 1992 and the overall diabetic complications in 1995. The correlation of metabolic values over time in this study was low, as already mentioned. Earlier, Singh et al. (19) found a high variability of HbA1c in IDDM patients. In type 2 diabetes metabolic control is found to deteriorate over time (20), but in this study there was no significant sign of this. However, in an earlier paper, we found a more active anti-diabetic treatment in 1995, compared with 1992 (21). It seems that these two tendencies cancel each other out with regards to the mean values. The general conclusion is that predictive factors for both microvascular and macrovascular complications differ between diabetic men and women. Hypertension was of great importance among men in macrovascular complications, and also in retinopathy and nephropathy, but was of small importance among women. On the other hand, diabetes duration was of great importance among women in macrovascular complications. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Thanks are due to Jan Eggert and Henry Säfström, GPs at the community health centres.

Micro ascular and macro ascular complications in patients with type 2 diabetes 121 REFERENCES 1. Nathan DM. Long-term complications of diabetes mellitus (review article). N Engl J Med 1993;328:1676 85. 2. Klein R. Hyperglycemia and microvascular and macrovascular disease in diabetes. Diabetes Care 1993;18:258 68. 3. Dahl-Jørgensen K, Brinchmann-Hansen O, Bangstad HJ, Hanssen KF. Blood glucose control and microvascular complications what do we know? Diabetologia 1994;37:1172 7. 4. Anonymous. A strategy for arterial risk assessment and management in type 2 (non-insulin-dependent) diabetes mellitus. European Arterial Risk Policy Group on behalf of the International Diabetes Federation European Region. Diabet Med 1997;14:611 21. 5. Kuusisto J, Mykkänen L, Pyörälä K, Laakso M. NIDDM and its metabolic control predict coronary heart disease in elderly subjects. Diabetes 1994;43:960 7. 6. Laakso M, Kuusisto J. Epidemiological evidence for the association of hyperglycaemia and atherosclerotic vascular disease in non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus. Ann Med 1996;28:415 8. 7. Abraira C, Colwell J, Nuttall F, Sawin CT, Henderson W, Comstock JP, et al. Cardiovascular events and correlates in the Veterans Affairs Diabetes Feasibility Trial. Arch Intern Med 1997;157:181 8. 8. Meigs JB, Singer DE, Sullivan LM, Dukes KA, D Agostino RB, Nathan DM, et al. Metabolic control and prevalent cardiovascular disease in non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (NIDDM): the NIDDM Patient Outcomes Research Team. Am J Med 1997;102:38 47. 9. UK Prospective Diabetes Study Group. Intensive bloodglucose control with sulphonylureas or insulin compared with conventional treatment and risk of complications in patients with type 2 diabetes (UKPDS 33). Lancet 1998;352:837 53. 10. Yamamoto M, Egusa G, Okubo M, Yamakido M. Dissociation of microangiopathy and macroangiopathy in patients with type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Care 1998;21:1451 4. 11. UK Prospective Diabetes Study Group. Tight blood pressure control and risk of macrovascular and microvascular complications in type 2 diabetes: UKPDS 38. BMJ 1998;317:703 13. 12. Haffner SM, Miettinen H, Stern MP. Relatively more atherogenic coronary heart disease risk factors in prediabetic women than in prediabetic men. Diabetologia 1997;40:711 7. 13. Will JC, Casper M. The contribution of diabetes to early deaths from ischemic heart disease: US gender and racial comparisons. Am J Public Health 1996;86:576 9. 14. Orchard TJ. The impact of gender and general risk factors of atherosclerotic vascular disease in non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus. Ann Med 1996;28:323 33. 15. Wändell P, Brorsson B, Åberg H. Diabetic patients in Swedish primary health care quality of care three years apart. Scand J Prim Health Care 1998;16:44 9. 16. O stman J, Larsson Y, Adamson U, Ericsson A, Nilsson B, Wredling R. Diabetesvården granskad i åtta län (Diabetic care examined in eight counties). Läkartidningen 1995;92:1483 6. 17. Hjelm K, Isacsson Å, Apelqvist J, Sundquist J, Nyberg P. Foreign- and Swedish-born diabetic patients a population-based study of prevalence, glycaemic control and social position. Scand J Soc Med 1996;24:243 52. 18. Tunstall-Pedoe H, Woodard M, Tavendale R, A Brook R, McCluskey MK. Comparison of the prediction by 27 different factors of coronary heart disease and death in men and women of the Scottish heart health study: cohort study. BMJ 1997;315:722 9. 19. Singh BM, McNamara C, Wise PH. High variability of glycated hemoglobin concentrations in patients with IDDM followed over 9 years. Diabetes Care 1997;20:306 8. 20. Clauson P, Linnarsson R, Gottsäter A, Sundkvist G, Grill V. Relationships between diabetes duration, metabolic control and -cell function in a representative population of type 2 diabetic patients in Sweden. Diabet Med 1994;11:794 801. 21. Wändell P, Brorsson B, Åberg H. Drug prescription in diabetic patients in Stockholm in 1992 and 1995 change over time. Eur J Clin Pharmacol 1997;52:249 54..