Medicare Part D Overutilization Monitoring System

Similar documents
Amy Larrick Chavez-Valdez, Director, Medicare Drug Benefit and C & D Data Group

All Medicare Advantage, Prescription Drug Plan, Cost, PACE, and Demonstration Organizations Systems Staff

Part D PDE Data and the Opioid Epidemic

Medicare Part D Prescription Opioid Policies for 2019 Information for Pharmacists

Medicare Advantage Outreach and Education Bulletin

New Medicare Part D Prescription Opioid Policies for 2019 Information for Prescribers

Amy Larrick Chavez-Valdez, Director, Medicare Drug Benefit and C & D Data Group

Section I. Short-acting opioid Prior Authorization Criteria

Medicare Advantage Outreach and Education Bulletin

Medical Necessity and the Retrospective Review Process

Managing Opioid Overutilization Challenges

NM DRUG OVERDOSE PREVENTION QUARTERLY MEASURES REPORT THIRD QUARTER OF 2018 (2018Q3)

HOSPICE INFORMATION FOR MEDICARE PART D PLANS

News & Views. Antipsychotics on Maryland Medicaid PDL and Coverage of a 30-day Emergency Supply of Atypical Antipsychotics

Background. CMS finalized new policies for Medicare drug plans to follow starting on January 1,2019.

Curbing Prescription Drug Abuse in Medicaid

Opioid Policy Steering Committee: Prescribing Intervention--Exploring a Strategy for

USE OF OPIODS AT HIGHER DOSES IN PERSONS WITHOUT CANCER: MORPHINE EQUIVALENT DOSE EDIT

NM DRUG OVERDOSE PREVENTION QUARTERLY MEASURES REPORT FOURTH QUARTER OF 2017 (2017Q4)

POLICY AND PROCEDURE DOCUMENT NAME: Drug Recall Notification Process

All Part D Plan Sponsors and Medicare Hospice Providers. Part D Payment for Drugs for Beneficiaries Enrolled in Hospice Request for Comments

BUPRENORPHINE/NALOXONE THERAPY DOM CLINICAL GUIDELINES AND RECOMMENDED CHANGES

Medicare-Medicaid Data Integration (MMDI) Use Case: Profiling Potential Opioid Misuse among Dual Eligibles

Medicare Part D Opioid Policies for 2019 Information for Patients

See Important Reminder at the end of this policy for important regulatory and legal information.

PBMs: Impact on Cost and Quality of Pharmaceutical Care in the U.S.

NM DRUG OVERDOSE PREVENTION QUARTERLY MEASURES REPORT THIRD QUARTER OF 2017 (2017Q3)

Physician Injectable Drug List (PIDL) Department for Medicaid Services, HP, and Magellan Rx Management June 1, 2010

Texas Vendor Drug Program Specialty Drug List Process. February 2019

Challenges for U.S. Attorneys Offices (USAO) in Opioid Cases

Managed Health Services (MHS) Candace V. Ervin Market Manager, Indiana Provider Relations October 18, 2017

ADMINISTRATIVE POLICY AND PROCEDURES MedStar Family Choice Medicare Advantage Plans

2. Is this request for a preferred medication? Y N

Clinical Policy: Opioid Analgesics Reference Number: CP.PMN.97 Effective Date: Last Review Date: 02.18

EHR Incentive Programs for Eligible Professionals: What You Need to Know for 2015 Tipsheet

3. Has the patient had a sustained improvement in Pain or Function (e.g. PEG scale with a 30 percent response from baseline)?

REQUEST FOR MEDICARE PRESCRIPTION DRUG COVERAGE DETERMINATION This form may be sent to us by mail or fax:

Smart Care California: Multi-Stakeholder Strategies for Reducing Opioid Overuse. Jennifer Wong, MPH IHA Stakeholders Meeting September 19, 2017

See Important Reminder at the end of this policy for important regulatory and legal information.

The Oregon Opioid Initiative. State Pain & Opioid Conference Prescription Drug Monitoring May 2018 Lisa Millet, Public Health Division

Clinical Policy: Opioid Analgesics Reference Number: CP.PMN.97 Effective Date: Last Review Date: 02.19

Idaho DUR Board Meeting Minutes

NIA Magellan 1 Radiation Oncology Solution Provider Training

Telligen Quality Innovation Network Quality Improvement Organization

FDA 510(k) 101 The Basics

Idaho DUR Board Meeting Minutes

Submitted to the House Energy and Commerce Committee. Federal Efforts to Combat the Opioid Crisis

April 26, New Mexico Board of Pharmacy Prescription Monitoring Program (PMP) New Mexico Board of Pharmacy Prescription Monitoring Program (PMP)

Evaluation of a Medicaid Psychotropic Drug Management Program in Utah

4/24/15. New Mexico s Prescription Monitoring Program. Carl Flansbaum, RPh. PMP Director New Mexico Board of Pharmacy. New Mexico and the PMP

The STOP Measure. Safe and Transparent Opioid Prescribing to Promote Patient Safety and Reduced Risk of Opioid Misuse FEBRUARY 2018

USDA Demonstration Project for Non-Congregate Feeding for Outdoor Summer Meal Sites Experiencing Excessive Heat

Opioid Management of Chronic (Non- Cancer) Pain

510(k) submissions. Getting US FDA clearance for your device: Improving

See Important Reminder at the end of this policy for important regulatory and legal information.

Addressing Prescription Drug Abuse. Allan Coukell Senior Director, Drugs and Medical Devices The Pew Charitable Trust

Part D Benefits & Clinical Research Trials: What's Covered

FirstCare Health Plans (FirstCare) is on track to be ICD-10 ready by the October 1, 2015 deadline.

2018 CMS Web Interface

Prescription Medication Guidelines for Medical Providers in CorVel s CorCare and Care IQ Networks

In its written comments on our draft report, CMS concurred with our recommendation.

PHYSICAL MEDICINE AND REHABILITATION CSHCN SERVICES PROGRAM PROVIDER MANUAL

Notice from the Executive Officer: Promoting Compliance with the Existing Limited Use Criteria for Fentanyl Transdermal Patch

DRUG PRODUCT INTERCHANGEABILITY AND PRICING ACT

Michigan Legislative and Regulatory Pharmacy Initiatives Update

UnitedHealthcare Pharmacy Clinical Pharmacy Programs

PQA Measure Development Update: June 2017

Guidance for Industry DRAFT GUIDANCE. This guidance document is being distributed for comment purposes only.

1. When are dispensers able to provide publicly funded naloxone emergency kits for Ontarians?

Confirm Limit--Level of detectable drugs in urine to confirm a positive test.

Oncology Solutions Provider Training Program. Horizon NJ Health

A COMPREHENSIVE APPROACH TO MANAGING DIABETES

2017 CMS Web Interface Reporting

PHARMACY Section 9. Overview. Preferred Drug List. Additions and Exceptions to the Preferred Drug List

ANNUAL REPORT

2017 CMS Web Interface Reporting

Prescription Monitoring Program (PMP)

Idaho DUR Board Meeting Minutes

Issues for Part D Compliance

See Important Reminder at the end of this policy for important regulatory and legal information.

Pharmaceutical Management Medicaid 2019

Ministry of Health and Long-Term Care Ontario Public Drug Programs. 1. What changes are occurring to the ONPP?

October 2015 news bulletin

OCCUPATIONAL AND PROFESSIONAL LICENSING MEDICINE AND SURGERY PRACTITIONERS MANAGEMENT OF PAIN AND OTHER CONDITIONS WITH CONTROLLED SUBSTANCES

PATIENT SIGNATURE: DOB: Date:

Dental Dialog. Highlighting news, programs, policies and tips for Aetna participating dentists. Fall aetna.com

Ontario s Narcotics Strategy

CLINICAL POLICY Clinical Policy: Extended Release Opioid Analgesics

Prescription Drug Monitoring Program

See Important Reminder at the end of this policy for important regulatory and legal information.

literature that drug combinations containing butalbital should not be used in treatment of chronic pain and are not appropriate for long term routine

Strategic Peer-Enhanced Care and Treatment Retention Model (SPECTRuM) Initiative. Intervention Protocol #2

April 23, Questions regarding this document? Contact us at: Provider Network Education - July 2014

Shining a Light on MEDs Understanding morphine equivalent dose

Guidance for Industry

Safety Evaluation for Substances Directly Added to Food

11/11/2015. MVAs Suicide Firearms Homicide. Where Can I Find A Copy of the PDMP Law? Why Was the Law Established? Why Was the Law Established?

Schedules of Controlled Substances: Placement of Furanyl fentanyl, 4- Fluoroisobutyryl fentanyl, Acryl fentanyl, Tetrahydrofuranyl fentanyl, and

Report to the Legislature: Impact of the Minnesota Prescription Monitoring Program on Doctor Shopping

Transcription:

Medicare Part D Overutilization Monitoring System Lisa Thorpe, Division of Part D Policy Gary Wirth, Division of Clinical and Operational Performance Medicare Drug Benefit and C&D Data Group July 17, 2013

Presentation Overview Summary Background Overutilization Monitoring System Overutilization Issue Types Review Process Website Reports Response Form Future Development Additional Information Questions 2

Summary The Overutilization Monitoring System (OMS) will help CMS to ensure that sponsors have established reasonable and appropriate drug utilization management programs to assist in preventing overutilization of prescribed medications as required by 42 C.F.R 423.153 et seq. Beneficiaries with potential opioid or acetaminophen (APAP) overutilization issues or referred by the CMS Center for Program Integrity (CPI) due to possible utilization issues will be reported to sponsors on a quarterly basis. Sponsors will be required to respond to CMS within 30 days on the status of their review of each beneficiary case. The first reports will be available on July 31, 2013. 3

Background Policy Development GAO Report, Sept. 6, 2011, Medicare Part D, Instances of Questionable Access to Prescription Drugs 1 In September 2011, CMS began working on an approach to help sponsors identify and manage the most egregious cases of opioid overutilization. Comprehensive policy was set forth in the final Call Letter (April 2, 2012) for CY 2013 and in more detail in final supplemental guidance (September 6, 2012), effective January 1, 2013. 1 GAO-11-699. (Washington, D.C.: Sept. 6, 2011). 4

Background Three Levels for Improving Drug Utilization Review Controls in Part D Level One: Improved Use of Concurrent Claim Edits (Safety Controls at POS) Part D sponsors expected to prevent coverage of unsafe daily doses of acetaminophen (APAP). Maximum dose is 4 grams/day as recommended by FDA. Level Two: Improved Use of Formulary Management Designs (Quantity Limits at POS) Part D sponsors may also submit QLs to CMS for approval when no FDA maximum dose (e.g., most opioid analgesics) or below FDA maximum dose. Sponsors may submit plan-level POS edits based upon cumulative MED across the opioid class (Final CY 2014 Call letter April 1, 2013) 5

Background Level Three : Improved Retrospective DUR Programming & Case Management Part D sponsors should look for apparent duplicative opioid drug use over sustained periods of time and/or across multiple opioid drug products in high doses. CMS methodology identified a narrow target population of non-borderline cases of opioid overutilization. Use of more than 120 mg MED for at least 90 consecutive days from more than 3 prescribers and more than 3 pharmacies Clinical staff to communicate with prescribers to ascertain medical necessity, and include information about the existence of multiple prescribers and the beneficiary s total opioid utilization. Results of case management to confirm: 1) current level of opioids; 2) lower level of opioids; or 3) no opioids. 6

Background Level Three : Improved Retrospective DUR Programming & Case Management (cont.) Part D sponsors must determine appropriate claim edit for beneficiary when current level is not confirmed to be medically necessary. Part D sponsors must provide 30-day advance written notice to beneficiary and opioid prescriber(s) of pending POS edit with the right to contest, and send copy of notice to CMS. CMS expected to see implementation of claim edits by Q2 2013. CMS will be monitoring Part D sponsors implementation through the new Overutilization Monitoring System (OMS). 7

Overutilization Monitoring System (OMS) Overview Where: The OMS module adds new functionality to the Patient Safety Analysis Website. Who is included: Each beneficiary with a potential overutilization issue (i.e., APAP, Opioid, or CPI Referral) will be assigned a ticket number, which may include multiple overutilization issues. Beneficiaries for whom CMS has been notified that a POS edit is in place will be suppressed from the overutilization reports for a given contract ID and issue type. 8

Overutilization Monitoring System (OMS) Overview (continued) What is included: Contract-level reports of beneficiaries with potential overutilization issues will be available to Part D sponsors. Sponsors will be required to send responses to CMS describing the status of the review of each beneficiary s case. The OMS reports are not a substitute for sponsors own internal processes to identify which beneficiaries should be targeted for case management. When: The first reports will be available through the Patient Safety Analysis Website at the end of July 2013, with sponsors responses due within 30 days. Sponsors will be notified by email when their reports and the response form are available for download. 9

Overutilization Issue Types Methodology Overview Potential overutilization is identified through analysis of PDE data with dates of service within the prior two calendar quarters. May encompass multiple contract IDs Beneficiaries current enrollment determined through the Common Medicare Environment (CME) file The medication lists for each drug class were created using data from Medi-Span and First Databank. NDCs with obsolete dates more than one year before the start of the analysis period are excluded. 10

Overutilization Issue Types Acetaminophen (APAP) Overutilization of APAP: Use of APAP with daily dose exceeding 4 grams for a total of 30 days or more during the measurement period. 11

Overutilization Issue Types Opioids Overutilization of Opioid Drugs: Use of opioids with cumulative daily morphine equivalent dose (MED) exceeding 120mg for at least 90 consecutive days, and opioid medications received from more than 3 prescribers and more than 3 pharmacies. Excludes patients with cancer diagnoses, as listed in the 2011 Risk Adjustment Processing System (RAPS) dataset. Excludes patients receiving hospice care determined by the 2013 Enrollment Database (EDB). Updated opioid product list and conversion factors from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). 12

Overutilization Issue Types Center for Program Integrity (CPI) Referrals Potential utilization issues referred by the Medicare Center for Program Integrity (CPI) for review. Cases were originally referred to the MEDIC, and subsequently referred to local law enforcement. Involve potential fraud or abuse of prescriptions in the Part D program. May include non-opioid cases. Analysis may use more than the previous six months of PDE data. 13

Review Process Authorized users of the Patient Safety Analysis Website will receive email notification that their OMS package is ready for download. Sponsors will then: Download the OMS package from the Patient Safety Analysis Website. Compare the overutilization data for each beneficiary on the OMS Reports with their Part D plan s DUR and case management records. Complete the Response Form within 30 days by entering the responder s contact information and selecting the appropriate response codes for each beneficiary s potential overutilization issues. Upload the completed response form to the Patient Safety Analysis Website through the secure Upload Files feature. Sponsors can view the number and types of overutilization issues at the contract level, and monitor the submission status of their quarterly overutilization responses through the Patient Safety Analysis Website. 14

Website Access Currently authorized users of the Patient Safety Analysis Website will be automatically granted comparable access to OMS functionality. The Medicare Compliance Officer selects up to five users and their access levels. At least one user from each contract must have access to Summary and Confidential Beneficiary Reports to view and respond to beneficiary-level overutilization issues. Add new users or modify users access for the OMS by July 16, 2013. PACE plans must assign authorized users of the Patient Safety Analysis Website if they have not already done so. 15

Website Summary Tracking 16

Website Ticket Tracking 17

Website Download Files 18

Website Upload Files 19

Website Upload File History 20

Reports OMS Reports will be available at the contract and beneficiary levels. 1. Contract Summary current and historical contract-level information about beneficiaries in this contract that were identified as having potential overutilization issues. 2. Beneficiary Summary beneficiary-level history of overutilization issues for all beneficiaries ever reported in the overutilization monitoring reports. 3. Current APAP Issues detailed information about each beneficiary requiring review for a potential APAP overutilization issue identified during the period measured. 4. Current Opioid Issues detailed information about each beneficiary requiring review for a potential opioid overutilization issue identified during the period measured. 5. Current CPI Referrals detailed information about each beneficiary referred by the Medicare Center for Program Integrity for review of a potential overutilization issue. 6. Closed Issues detailed information about all potential overutilization issues that have been closed by the sponsor in previous reporting periods and currently do not require a response. 21

Reports Contract Summary 22

Reports Beneficiary Summary 23

Reports Current APAP Issues 24

Reports Current Opioid Issues 25

Reports Current CPI Referrals 26

Reports Closed Issues 27

Response Form Requirements Part D sponsors must provide a response on the status of their reviews and assessments of all beneficiaries identified on the OMS Reports. Completed Response Forms are due within 30 days of the Report Date. Upload one Response Form for all open tickets for a Contract or multiple Response Forms for subsets of tickets for a Contract. Also use the Response Form to update responses for open tickets. The most recent response received for a given ticket number and issue at the close of the submission period will be analyzed. 28

Response Form Requirements (continued) Response Forms must be uploaded via the secure Upload Files feature of the Patient Safety Analysis Website in order to be considered for review. Forms will not be accepted via any other means. Response Forms submitted after the submission deadline for a ticket will not be reviewed. 29

Response Form Example 30

Response Form Response Codes Code Response Known Exception BDC No further review planned: Beneficiary is deceased. Yes. BII BDS BXD BSC No further review planned: Beneficiary is incarcerated/institutionalized. No further review planned: Beneficiary dis-enrolled from contract. No further review planned: Beneficiary has exempt diagnosis. No further review planned: Beneficiary did not meet the sponsor's internal criteria. Yes, for measure of same drug class. INC Review in progress. PS1 POS edit determined necessary: No drugs in the class allowed. Yes, for measure of same drug class and contract ID. PS2 POS edit determined necessary: One or more drugs in the class allowed. Yes, for measure of same drug class and contract ID. BOR DMN POS edit not determined necessary: Beneficiary s overutilization resolved. POS edit not determined necessary: Drug(s) and dose(s) are deemed medically necessary. Yes, for measure of same drug class and contract ID. 31

Future Development Collect POS edit information from sponsors, including notification, implementation and discontinuation dates, which is partially provided to CMS by email to the Part D Policy mailbox (PartDPolicy@cms.hhs.gov). Collect information from sponsors on beneficiaries they identified with potential APAP or opioid overutilization issues that are not included in the OMS reports. 32

Additional Information Additional information will be available on the Patient Safety Analysis Website under Help Documents, including the OMS User Guide and National Drug Code (NDC) medication lists used to identify the opioid and APAP overutilization issues. If you need help accessing the Overutilization Monitoring Package or have questions about its content, contact the Acumen, LLC help desk: Email: PatientSafety@AcumenLLC.com Phone: (650) 558-8006 For questions related to the Overutilization Monitoring System, send an email with OMS in the subject line to PartDPolicy@cms.hhs.gov. For questions related to CMS overutilization management policy, send an email with Overutilization Policy in the subject line to PartDPolicy@cms.hhs.gov. 33

Questions? 34