Improving Door-to-Needle Times in Acute Ischemic Stroke: Principal Results from the Target: Stroke Initiative

Similar documents
Improving Door-to-Needle Times in Acute Ischemic Stroke: Principal Results from the Target: Stroke Initiative

Advancing Stroke Systems of Care to Improve Outcomes Update on Target: Stroke Phase II

Get With The Guidelines: Lessons for National Healthcare Improvement Programs

Jointly provided by Potomac Center for Medical Education and Rockpointe Supported by an educational grant from Genentech, A Member of the Roche Group

Welcome to the 2014 Quality Achievement Awards at International Stroke Conference! 3/5/ , American Heart Association 2

Thrombolytic therapy with intravenous tissue-type plasminogen

Each year, more than Americans have a stroke

Race/Ethnic Differences in the Risk of Hemorrhagic Complications Among Patients With Ischemic Stroke Receiving Thrombolytic Therapy

Organizational, or Other Financial Benefit None None None None None None. None None None None None None

Which Hospitals Treat Patients with the Most Severe Acute Ischemic Strokes? Implications for Hospital Mortality Reporting

Data quality in the American Heart Association Get With The Guidelines-Stroke (GWTG-Stroke): Results from a National Data Validation Audit

Supplementary Online Content

Strategies Used by Hospitals to Improve Speed of Tissue-Type Plasminogen Activator Treatment in Acute Ischemic Stroke

Original Article. Chronic Kidney Disease and Bleeding Complications After Intravenous Thrombolytic Therapy for Acute Ischemic Stroke

Quality of Care and Outcomes for In-Hospital Ischemic Stroke Findings From the National Get With The Guidelines-Stroke

Emergency Medical Service Hospital Prenotification Is Associated With Improved Evaluation and Treatment of Acute Ischemic Stroke

INTRAVENOUS (IV) TISSUE-TYPE PLASminogen

Tissue-type plasminogen activator (tpa) is a proven intervention

Drip and Ship Thrombolytic Therapy for Acute Ischemic Stroke Use, Temporal Trends, and Outcomes

Chronic kidney disease (CKD) is a frequent comorbidity

10-Year Mortality of Older Acute Myocardial Infarction Patients Treated in U.S. Community Practice

Eligibility for acute ischemic stroke interventions depends

JAMA. 2012;307(24):

Antithrombotics: Percent of patients with an ischemic stroke or TIA prescribed antithrombotic therapy at discharge. Corresponding

Disclosures. Dr. Scirica has also served as a consultant for Lexicon, Arena, Gilead, and Eisai.

Tissue plasminogen activator (tpa) improves outcome

TENNESSEE STROKE REGISTRY QUARTERLY REPORT

Stroke Systems of Care Update

The Harvard community has made this article openly available. Please share how this access benefits you. Your story matters

TENNESSEE STROKE REGISTRY QUARTERLY REPORT

Translating Quality Improvement into Research

Prior Antithrombotic Use is Associated with Favorable Mortality and Functional Outcomes in Acute Ischemic Stroke

Stroke is the second leading cause of death worldwide. More

Association of Acute and Chronic Hyperglycemia With Acute Ischemic Stroke Outcomes Post Thrombolysis: Findings From Get With The Guidelines Stroke

Mechanical Endovascular Reperfusion Therapy

Target: STROKE. The Team-Based Approached

INCREASING ATTENTION HAS BEEN

Transfer in D2B. Scott D Friedman, MD FACC Medical Director, Cardiology Services Shore Health System of Maryland. The Problem

The Changing Landscape of Managing Patients with PAD- Update on the Evidence and Practice of Care in Patients with Peripheral Artery Disease

The Strategic Reperfusion Early After STEMI study Implications for clinical practice

The ACCELERATE Trial

STAR- - Stroke Treatment Alliance of Rochester

A Clinical Context Report

Recent Nationwide Trends in Discharge Statin Treatment of Hospitalized Patients With Stroke

HIP ATTACK Trial: Can we improve outcomes after a hip fracture with accelerated surgery? PJ Devereaux, MD, PhD

Speakers. 2015, American Heart Association 1

Methods Data source. Study population. Outcome measures. Statistical analysis

QUality Enhancement for Speedy Thrombolysis in Stroke

Antithrombotic therapy in the ACS patient with atrial fibrillation

Acute Stroke Systems of Care Optimizing Patient Care and Improving Outcomes

When Not To Give TPA Steve Phillips Division of Neurology

Pragmatic Trial Design to Study Health Policy Interventions: Lessons Learned from ARTEMIS Tracy Y. Wang, MD, MHS, MSc, FACC, FAHA

Intravenous tissue-type plasminogen activator (tpa) can

Door to Needle Time: Gold Standard of Stroke Treatment Fatima Milfred, MD. Virginia Mason Medical Center March 16, 2018

Tissue-type plasminogen activator (tpa) is a proven intervention. Special Report

STEMI Care 2014 at the Crossroads: Taking the right road

Disclosures for Dr. Bhatt

Standards of excellence

Can We Apply Lessons Learned in Stroke Centers to Change Aspects of Cardiac Arrest Care?

The Harvard community has made this article openly available. Please share how this access benefits you. Your story matters

Statewide Acute Stroke Triage The Washington Story

Updates in Stroke Management. Jessica A Starr, PharmD, FCCP, BCPS Associate Clinical Professor Auburn University Harrison School of Pharmacy

Ambarish Pandey, MD UT Southwestern Medical Center Dallas,

SHOULD A REGIONAL STEMI CENTRE ONLY OFFER PRIMARY PCI?

Acute Coronary Syndromes: Different Continents, Different Guidelines?

List of Exhibits Adult Stroke

Events after discontinuation of randomized treatment at the end of the ARISTOTLE trial

Atrial fibrillation is a potent risk factor for ischemic

Mission: Lifeline Addressing the System of STEMI Care

Primary Stroke Center Quality & Performance Measures

Regional Variation in Recommended Treatments for Ischemic Stroke and TIA Get With the Guidelines-Stroke

Rural Minnesota STEMI Systems of Care

MMS/Mass Coalition Program, Nov. 4, 2008 Patients with AF: Who Should be on Warfarin?

Update Guidelines in STEMI Management: Focus on Logistic and System Approach to Reperfusion Therapy

Endovascular Treatment Updates in Stroke Care

Relationship between Center Time in Therapeutic Range and Comparative Treatment Effect of Rivaroxaban and Warfarin: Results from the ROCKET AF Trial

Kenneth W. Mahaffey, MD and Keith AA Fox, MB ChB

Overcoming the Risk-Treatment Paradox in Non-STE ACS: It s Time! Christopher Granger, MD

Overview. International Stroke Conference Update Clot buster use rises most among 80 and older stroke patients ACUTE STROKE 2/13/2015

Practical Considerations in the Early Treatment of Acute Stroke

Accelerating Treatments for Better Acute Ischemic Stroke Outcomes A CMS Special Innovation Project

Affordability and Real-world Antiplatelet Treatment Effectiveness After Myocardial Infarction Study

Do Clinical Practice Guidelines Improve Outcomes?

Lipid testing and treatment is well established for secondary

NIH Public Access Author Manuscript Stroke. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2015 January 16.

Rivaroxaban in Patients Stabilized After a ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction

Get With the Guidelines Stroke PMT. Quality Measure Descriptions

State of the Art in the ACS Atrial Fibrillation Overlap Syndrome

Do Not Cite. Draft for Work Group Review.

Disclosures The PREVENT IV Trial was supported by Corgentech and Bristol-Myers Squibb

Trends and Variation in Oral Anticoagulant Choice in Patients with Atrial Fibrillation,

WHICH ANTITHROMBOTIC REGIMEN? Action Study Group Institut de Cardiologie - Pitié-Salpêtrière Hospital Paris, France.

The tpa Cage Match. Disclosures. Cage Match. Cage Match 1/27/2014. January 8, Advisory Boards

The Joint Commission: Comprehensive Overview of Advanced Stroke & Advance Heart Failure Programs

Managing the Measures: A Serious Look at Key Abstraction Concepts for the Comprehensive Stroke (CSTK) Measure Set Session 2

Roxana Mehran, Dominick J. Angiolillo, Ron Waksman, Joseph M. Sweeny, Ganesh Raveendran, Renli Teng, Yonggang Zhao, Glenn Carlson NCT

Emergency Department Stroke Registry Process of Care Indicator Specifications (July 1, 2011 June 30, 2012 Dates of Service)

Drano vs. MR CLEAN Review of New Endovascular Therapy for Acute Ischemic Stroke Patients

Compliance With Joint Commission Measures in State-Designated Stroke Centers

Transforming the Unprecedented REDUCE-IT Study Results into Clinical Practice

Transcription:

Improving Door-to-Needle Times in Acute Ischemic Stroke: Principal Results from the Target: Stroke Initiative Gregg C. Fonarow MD, Xin Zhao MS, Eric E. Smith MD, MPH, Jeffrey L. Saver MD, Mathew J. Reeves PhD, Deepak L. Bhatt MD, MPH, Ying Xian MD, PhD, Adrian F. Hernandez MD, MHS, Eric D. Peterson MD, MPH, Lee H. Schwamm, MD UCLA Division of Cardiology; Duke Clinical Research Center Department of Clinical Neurosciences, Hotchkiss Brain Institute, UCLA Department of Neurology Department of Epidemiology Michigan State University, Brigham and Women s Hospital and Harvard Medical School; Department of Neurology Massachusetts General Hospital

Disclosures Funding / Support: Target: Stroke is an initiative provided by the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association. The GWTG-Stroke program is provided by the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association. The GWTG-Stroke program is currently supported in part by a charitable contribution from Janssen Pharmaceutical Companies of Johnson & Johnson. GWTG-Stroke has been funded in the past through support from Boeringher-Ingelheim, Merck, Bristol-Myers Squib/Sanofi Pharmaceutical Partnership and the AHA Pharmaceutical Roundtable. Presenter Disclosure Information: G.C. Fonarow: Employment; Significant; Dr. Fonarow is an employee of the University of California, which holds a patent on retriever devices for stroke. X. Zhao: Other; Modest; Dr. Zhao is a member of the Duke Clinical Research Institute which serves as the American Heart Association GWTG data coordinating center.. E.E. Smith: None. J.L. Saver: Employment; Significant; Dr. Saver is an employee of the University of California, which holds a patent on retriever devices for stroke.. Consultant/Advisory Board; Modest; CoAxia, Covidien, Grifols, Cygnis. M.J. Reeves: None. D.L. Bhatt: Research Grant; Modest; Amarin, AstraZeneca, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Eisai, Ethicon, Medtronic, Sanofi Aventis, The Medicines Company. Other Research Support; Modest; FlowCo, PLx Pharma, Takeda. Honoraria; Modest; American College of Cardiology (Editor, Clinical Trials, Cardiosource), Belvoir Publications (Editor in Chief, Harvard Heart Letter), Duke Clinical Research Institute (clinical trial steering committees), Population Health Research Institute (clinical trial steering committee), Slack Publications (Chief Medical Editor, Cardiology Today's Intervention), WebMD (CME Steering committees). Consultant/Advisory Board; Modest; Elsevier Practice Update Cardiology, Medscape Cardiology, Regado Biosciences, Board of Directors for Boston VA Research Institute, BOD, Society of Cardiovascular Patient Care, Chair, AHA GWTG Steering Committee. Other; Modest; Senior Associate Editor, Journal of Invasive Cardiology, Data Monitoring Committees, Duke Clinical Research Institute, Harvard Clinical Research Institute, Mayo Clinic, Population Health Research Institute. Y. Xian: Other; Modest; Dr. Xian is a member of the Duke Clinical Research Institute which serves as the American Heart Association Get with the Guidelines data coordinating center. A. Hernandez: Research Grant; Modest; BMS, Janssen, Medtronic, Merck, Portola. Honoraria; Modest; Boston Scientific, BMS, Gilead, Janssen, Novartis. E.D. Peterson: Research Grant; Modest; American College of Cardiology, American Heart Association, Society of Thoracic Surgeons, Eli Lilly & Company, Janssen Pharmaceutical Products. Consultant/Advisory Board; Modest; Boehringer Ingelheim, Genetech, Eli Lilly & Company, Jansset Pharmaceutical Products, Merck & Co., Sanofi-Aventis. L.H. Swhwamm: Research Grant; Modest; NINDS, Genetech. Consultant/Advisory Board; Modest; Massachusetts Department of Public Health, The Joint Commission, Chair, GWTG Stroke Clinical Workgroup.

Background The benefits of intravenous tpa in acute ischemic stroke are highly timedependent. Because of the importance of rapid treatment, AHA/ASA guidelines recommend a door-to-needle (DTN) time of 60 minutes. Yet prior studies suggested fewer than 30% of intravenous tpa treated acute ischemic stroke patients in the United States were meeting this goal. To address this shortfall, Target: Stroke, a national initiative organized by the AHA/ASA, was launched in January 2010 to increase the proportion of stroke patients with DTN times 60 minutes (initial goal of 50%). Fonarow GC et al. Circulation. 2011;123:750-758.

Target: Stroke Target: Stroke was initiated by the AHA/ASA together with other partner organizations as a collaborative national initiative comprising a multidisciplinary group of clinicians and broad alliance of hospitals. The primary goal of Target: Stroke was for GWTG-Stroke participating hospitals in aggregate to treat at least 50% of acute ischemic stroke patients with tpa within 60 minutes or less of hospital arrival. An expert working group performed a systematic review of the published data on improving DTN times and identified 10 key evidence-based strategies associated with timely stroke reperfusion that could be most rapidly, feasibly, and cost effectively adopted by participating hospitals. Comprehensive implementation manual, clinical decision support tools, education, sharing of best practices, performance feedback, and national recognition opportunities. Fonarow GC et al Stroke. 2011;42:2983-2989.

Target: Stroke 10 Key Best Practice Strategies 1. Hospital pre-notification by Emergency Medical Services 2. Rapid triage protocol and stroke team notification 3. Single call/paging activation system for entire stroke team 4. Use of a stroke toolkit containing clinical decision support, strokespecific order sets, guidelines, hospital-specific algorithms, critical pathways, NIH Stroke Scale and other stroke tools 5. Rapid acquisition and interpretation of brain imaging 6. Rapid Laboratory Testing (including point-of-care testing) if indicated 7. Pre-mixing tpa medication ahead of time for high likelihood candidates 8. Rapid access to intravenous tpa in the ED/brain imaging area 9. Team-based approach 10. Rapid data feedback to stroke team on each patient s DTN time and other performance data Fonarow GC et al Stroke. 2011;42:2983-2989.

Customizable Implementation Tools Patient time-trackers Guideline based algorithms tpa checklist Standardized order sets Dosing charts Clinical pathways Evidence-based protocols EMS tools Patient educational materials Other tools Target: Stroke tools: www.targetstroke.org Clinical tools library: heart.org/strokeclinicaltools. Fonarow GC et al Stroke. 2011;42:2983-2989.

Objectives To evaluate the principle results of the Target: Stroke by analyzing the temporal trends in DTN times and proportion of patients with DTN times 60 minutes before and after initiation of the Target: Stroke program among GWTG-Stroke participating hospitals. To evaluate whether potential improvements in DTN times were associated with improvements in clinical outcomes including in-hospital mortality, discharge destination, ambulatory status, symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage 36 hours after tpa, and overall tpa complications.

Methods This study included 71,169 stroke patients treated with tpa (27,319 preintervention, 43,850 post-intervention) from 1,030 GWTG-Stroke participating hospitals during the pre- and post-target: Stroke periods. Quarterly rates of DTN times 60 minutes and clinical outcomes pre- Target: Stroke (2003-2009) were compared to post-target Stroke (2010-2013). Adjustment for patient and hospital characteristics. To account for withinhospital clustering, generalized estimating equations were used. To compare the temporal change in rates of DTN times piecewise (segmented) logistic regression analyses were performed. Clinical outcomes assessed: in-hospital mortality, discharge destination, ambulatory status, symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage 36 hours after tpa, and overall tpa complications.

Selection of the Study Population 1,587,230 Patients with Acute Ischemic Stroke 1,487,761 Excluded In-Hospital Strokes (n=30,897) Transferred In (n=174,002) Not Treated with IV tpa (n=1,278,602) tpa at Outside Hospital (n=4,260) 99,469 Patients Treated with IV tpa at Participating Hospital 21,500 Excluded Experimental Protocol (n=458) Time(s) Missing (n=4,421) Treated >3 Hours Post Onset (n=16,621) 6,800 Excluded Hospitals Not Participating During Both Pre- and Post-Target: Stroke Periods (n=6,800) Hospitals n=1030 Primary Analysis: Patients with OTT times 3 hours (Class I in guidelines) Sensitivity Analysis: Patients with OTT times 4.5 hours (Class IIA in guidelines) N=83,220 71,169 Patients Included in the Primary Analysis

Demographics and Clinical Characteristics Pre- and Post-Target: Stroke Characteristics Total (N=71,169) Pre-Target: Stroke (N=27,319) Post-Target: Stroke (N=43,850) Standardized Difference Demographics Age (median, 25 th, 75 th ) 72 (60-82) 72 (60-82) 72 (60-83) 3.70 Sex (%, women) 50.1 49.4 50.5 2.25 Race/Ethnicity (%) White Black Hispanic 72.8 75.1 71.4 8.43 13.8 12.6 14.5 5.80 6.6 5.7 7.3 6.51 Arrival and Admission Patient Arrival Mode (%, EMS) 80.4 84.6 77.7 17.8 Arrival on Hours (%, yes) 47.4 47.4 47.4 0.10 Onset-to-Arrival Time 51 (36-72) 50 (35-70) 52 (36-73) 4.74 Medical History Atrial Fibrillation/Flutter (%) 22.8 22.6 22.9 0.69 Previous Stroke/TIA (%) 23.7 22.5 24.5 4.79 CAD/Prior MI (%) 25.7 26.9 24.9 4.48 Diabetes Mellitus (%) 24.6 22.9 25.6 6.28 PVD (%) 3.5 3.4 3.5 0.87 Hypertension (%) 72.4 71.2 73.1 4.24 Smoking (%) 17.8 18.7 17.3 3.71 Evaluation NIH Stroke Scale (median, 25 th, 75 th ) 11 (6-18) 12 (7-18) 11 (6-18) 12.9 Length of Stay (days) 5 (3-8) 5 (3-8) 5 (3-7) 11.2

Characteristics Hospital Characteristics Pre- and Post-Target: Stroke Total (N=71,169) Pre-Target: Stroke (N=27,319) Post-Target: Stroke (N=43,850) Standardized Difference Annual Volume of Ischemic 233 (163-339) 240 (165-347) 230 (161-337) 2.50 Stroke Admissions (median, 25 th, 75 th ) Annual Volume of IV tpa 19.5 (11.6-29.6) 19.2 (11.6-29.3) 19.7 (11.7-29.6) 1.15 (median, 25 th, 75 th ) Number of Beds (median, 403 (283-595) 404 (283-601) 401 (280-588) 2.51 25 th, 75 th ) Region (%) West 21.5 21.2 21.7 1.23 South 33.9 32.3 34.8 5.27 Midwest 17.3 17.3 17.3 0.17 Northeast 27.3 29.2 26.2 6.83 Teaching Hospital (%) 65.2 65.5 65.0 0.94 Rural Location (%) 2.2 2.2 2.2 0.15 Certified Primary Stroke Center (%) 57.3 58.3 56.7 3.12 A standardized difference greater than 10 is typically considered meaningful.

Results: Impact on DTN Times The percentage of patients with DTN times 60 minutes increased from 29.6% immediately prior to the start of Target: Stroke in Quarter 4 of 2009) to 53.3% in Quarter 3 of 2013 (P<0.0001). The median DTN time was 74 minutes in Quarter 4 of 2009 immediately prior to initiation of Target: Stroke and declined to 59 minutes by Quarter 3 of 2013 (absolute difference 15 minutes, P<0.0001). In 2009, prior to initiation of Target: Stroke, 15.6% of hospitals had DTN times 60 minutes in 50% or more of tpa treated stroke patients whereas in 2013, this benchmark was being met by 46.7% of participating hospitals (P<0.0001).

03Q2 03Q3 03Q4 04Q1 04Q2 04Q3 04Q4 05Q1 05Q2 05Q3 05Q4 06Q1 06Q2 06Q3 06Q4 07Q1 07Q2 07Q3 07Q4 08Q1 08Q2 08Q3 08Q4 09Q1 09Q2 09Q3 09Q4 10Q1 10Q2 10Q3 10Q4 11Q1 11Q2 11Q3 11Q4 12Q1 12Q2 12Q3 12Q4 13Q1 13Q2 13Q3 % DTN Time 60 Minutes Time Trend in the Proportion of Patients with DTN Times within 60 Minutes Pre- and Post-Target: Stroke 0.6 0.5 (P<0.0001 for comparison of the two slopes) 0.4 0.3 0.2 0.1 Target: Stroke Initiation 0 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 Time (Quarter / Year)

Unadjusted and Adjusted Piecewise GEE Analyses for the Proportion of Patients with DTN Times within 60 Minutes Post- vs Pre-Target: Stroke Unadjusted Adjusted* Outcome Variable OR 95% CI P-value OR 95% CI P-value DTN time 60 Minutes Pre-Target: Stroke (per 4 quarters calendar time) Post-Target: Stroke (per 4 quarters calendar time) Post vs. Pre-Target: Stroke (per 4 quarters calendar time) Post vs. Pre-Target: Stroke (cumulative difference) 1.08 1.05-1.12 <0.0001 1.09 1.06-1.13 <0.0001 1.32 1.28-1.35 <0.0001 1.35 1.31-1.38 <0.0001 1.22 1.16-1.28 <0.0001 1.23 1.17-1.29 <0.0001 1.98 1.84-2.12 <0.0001 2.09 1.95-2.25 <0.0001 *Adjusted for patient characteristics including age, sex, race, medical history of atrial fibrillation, prosthetic heart valve, previous stroke/transient ischemic attack, coronary heart disease or prior myocardial infarction, carotid stenosis, peripheral vascular disease, hypertension, dyslipidemia, and current smoking, stroke severity (NIHSS), arrival time during regular work hours, arrival mode, onset-to-arrival time; hospital characteristics of hospital size, region, teaching status, certified primary stroke center, annual volume of tpa, and annual stroke discharge.

Results: Impact on DTN Times The annual rate of increase in the proportion of patients with DTN time 60 minutes was 1.36% per year pre-target: Stroke with notable acceleration to 6.20% per year after implementation of Target: Stroke (P<0.0001). The program goal of DTN times 60 minutes in at least 50% of patients was achieved in <4 years rather than the expected 15 or more years if the pre-target: Stroke intervention slope of increase in the proportion of patients with DTN times 60 minutes had persisted. The improvement in DTN times post-target: Stroke were observed among clinically relevant subgroups of patients including men and women, patients older and younger than the median age of 72, white, black, and Hispanic patients, and patients with greater and lesser stroke severity (NIHSS above and below the median of 11).

Results: Clinical Outcomes Pre- and Post-Target: Stroke Outcome In-Hospital Mortality Discharge Home Ambulatory Status Independent Symptomatic ICH Any tpa Complications Pre-Target: Stroke (n=27,319) Post-Target: Stroke (n=43,850) Difference Pre and Post P Value 9.93% 8.25% -1.68% <0.0001 37.6% 42.7% +5.1% <0.0001 42.2% 45.4% +3.2% <0.0001 5.68% 4.68% -1.00% <0.0001 6.68% 5.50% -1.18% <0.0001

Outcomes Pre- and Post-Target: Stroke- GEE Analyses Outcome Unadjusted Odds Ratios (95% CI) In-Hospital Mortality 0.81 (0.77-0.86) Discharge Home 1.23 (1.18-1.27) Ambulatory Status 1.14 Independent (1.09-1.20) Symptomatic ICH 0.81 (0.75-0.88) Any tpa Complications 0.80 (0.75-0.87) P Value Adjusted Odds Ratios (95% CI)* <0.0001 0.89 (0.83-0.94) <0.0001 1.14 (1.09-1.19) <0.0001 1.03 (0.97-1.10) <0.0001 0.83 (0.76-0.91) <0.0001 0.83 (0.77-0.90) P Value* 0.0002 <0.0001 0.3091 <0.0001 <0.0001 *Adjusted for patient characteristics including age, sex, race, medical history of atrial fibrillation, prosthetic heart valve, previous stroke/transient ischemic attack, coronary heart disease or prior myocardial infarction, carotid stenosis, peripheral vascular disease, hypertension, dyslipidemia, and current smoking, stroke severity (NIHSS), arrival time during regular work hours, arrival mode, onset-to-arrival time; hospital characteristics of hospital size, region, teaching status, certified primary stroke center, annual volume of tpa, and annual stroke discharge.

Results: Sensitivity Analyses Similar findings were obtained in sensitivity analyses including all intravenous tpa treated patients with onset-to-treatment times within 4.5 hours (n=83,220). There was a marked improvement in the proportion of patients with DTN times 60 minutes after initiation of Target: Stroke with a significant slope change starting in January 2010. This improvement in DTN times was accompanied by lower in-hospital mortality, symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage, and overall tpa complications with more patients able to be discharged to home. These findings remained highly statistically significant after adjusting for patient and hospital characteristics.

Limitations Participation in GWTG-Stroke/Target: Stroke was voluntary and these hospitals likely have greater interest in stroke quality improvement. Target: Stroke did not have a concurrent control group of hospitals and it is possible that the improvements in DTN times may have been influenced by other factors. However, efforts in place in the 2003-2009 timeframe were observed to have little impact on DTN times. Possibility for there to be residual measured and unmeasured confounders related to the improvements in DTN times and clinical outcomes. Data collected as part of GWTG-Stroke including DTN times are dependent on the accuracy and completeness of abstraction from the medical record.

Conclusions The timeliness of tpa administration improved substantially in GWTG- Stroke hospitals after initiation of the multidimensional AHA/ASA Target: Stroke quality initiative. The proportion of patients with DTN times 60 minutes increased from 29.6% to 53.3%. There was also a more than 4-fold increase in the annual rate of improvement in patients with DTN time 60 minutes. This improvement was accompanied by lower in-hospital mortality, symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage, and overall tpa complications with more patients able to be discharged to home. The results of this study suggest a favorable impact of applying performance improvement techniques of identifying best practices, clinical decision support, guideline-driven care improvement tools, educational outreach, collaborative support, performance profiling, feedback, and recognition.

Conclusions While there have been concerns that attempting to achieve shorter DTN times may lead to rushed assessments, inappropriate patient selection, dosing errors, and greater likelihood of complications, our findings suggest that more rapid reperfusion therapy in acute ischemic stroke is not only feasible, but can be achieved with actual reductions in complications and improved outcomes. These findings further reinforce the importance and substantial clinical benefits of more rapid administration of intravenous tpa.

Acknowledgements American Heart Association/American Stroke Association Target: Stroke / GWTG-Stroke Participating Hospitals Site Champions Hospital Teams Data Abstractors Target: Stroke / GWTG Staff Target: Stroke / GWTG Committee Volunteers DCRI

Back-up Slides

03Q2 03Q3 03Q4 04Q1 04Q2 04Q3 04Q4 05Q1 05Q2 05Q3 05Q4 06Q1 06Q2 06Q3 06Q4 07Q1 07Q2 07Q3 07Q4 08Q1 08Q2 08Q3 08Q4 09Q1 09Q2 09Q3 09Q4 10Q1 10Q2 10Q3 10Q4 11Q1 11Q2 11Q3 11Q4 12Q1 12Q2 12Q3 12Q4 13Q1 13Q2 13Q3 % DTN Time 60 Minutes Time Trend in the Proportion of Patients with DTN Times within 60 Minutes Pre- and Post-Target: Stroke in Patients with OTT Time within 4.5 Hours 0.6 0.5 0.4 0.3 0.2 0.1 0 Target: Stroke Initiation (P<0.0001 for comparison of the two slopes) Calendar Quarter

Clinical Outcomes Pre- and Post-Target: Stroke in Patients in Patients with Onset to Treatment Time within 4.5 Hours Outcome Pre-Target: Stroke (n=29,986) Post-Target: Stroke (n=53,234) P Value Unadjusted Odds Ratios (95% CI) P Value Adjusted Odds Ratios (95% CI)* P Value* In-Hospital Mortality 9.95% 8.08% <0.0001 0.79 (0.75-0.84) Discharge Home 37.6% 43.3% <0.0001 1.25 (1.20-1.29) <0.0001 0.90 (0.84-0.95) <0.0001 1.13 (1.08-1.17) 0.0004 <0.0001 Ambulatory Status Independent 42.2% 45.9% <0.0001 1.16 (1.10-1.22) <0.0001 1.02 (0.96-1.09) 0.4538 Symptomatic ICH 5.74% 4.74% <0.0001 0.81 (0.75-0.88) <0.0001 0.84 (0.78-0.92) <0.0001 Any tpa Complications 6.75% 5.54% <0.0001 0.80 (0.75-0.86) <0.0001 0.84 (0.78-0.91) <0.0001 *Adjusted for patient characteristics including age, sex, race, medical history of atrial fibrillation, prosthetic heart valve, previous stroke/transient ischemic attack, coronary heart disease or prior myocardial infarction, carotid stenosis, peripheral vascular disease, hypertension, dyslipidemia, and current smoking, stroke severity (NIHSS), arrival time during regular work hours, arrival mode, onset-to-arrival time; hospital characteristics of hospital size, region, teaching status, certified primary stroke center, annual volume of tpa, and annual stroke discharge.

Association of DTN Time 60 Minutes with in-hospital Clinical Outcomes in GWTG-Stroke 25,504 acute ischemic stroke patients treated with tpa within 3 hrs of symptom onset at 1082 hospital sites. After adjustment, DTN 60 minutes was associated with 22% lower odds of in-hospital mortality, adjusted OR, 0.78; 95% CI, 0.69 to 0.90; P=0.0003 Lower rates of sich and any tpa complications * Variables included in multivariable GEE models were age, sex, race, prior medical history of AF, stroke/tia, CHD/MI, carotid stenosis, diabetes, PVD, hypertension, dyslipidemia, smoking, NIHSS (continuous), arrival mode (EMS vs other), arrival time on hours, hospital characteristics of geographic region, academic, PSC, bed size, annual number of strokes, annual number of tpa patients. Fonarow GC et al. Circulation. 2011;123:750-758.

DTN Times Within 60 Minutes, % Temporal Trends in the Proportion of Patients with DTN Times 60 Minutes 2005-2009 100% 80% 60% 40% 26.3% 24.1% 26.6% 27.0% 29.1% 20% 0% 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Fonarow GC et al. Circulation. 2011;123:750-758. 1082 GWTG-Stroke Hospitals

% of Sites Hospital Variation in the Proportion of Ischemic Stroke Patients with DTN Times 60 Minutes 18 16 14 14.98 16.38 13.57 P<0.0001 Range 0%-79.2% 12 10 9.98 10.76 8 6 5.15 6.86 6.4 5.62 4 3.9 3.74 2 0 0.47 1.09 0.31 0.47 0.31 0 0 0 0 % Patients with DTN Times within 60 Minutes Fonarow GC et al. Circulation. 2011;123:750-758. Among hospitals with at least 10 tpa patients (N=641)