Long-term safety, tolerability and efficacy of alirocumab in high cardiovascular risk patients: ODYSSEY LONG TERM

Similar documents
Industry Relationships and Institutional Affiliations

IR Thematic Call on Alirocumab. September 2 nd, 2014

Industry Relationships and Institutional Affiliations

ADVANCES IN CARDIAC ARRHYTMIAS AND GREAT INNOVATIONS IN CARDIOLOGY Torino, October 13 15, 2016

Alirocumab Treatment Effect Did Not Differ Between Patients With and Without Low HDL-C or High Triglyceride Levels in Phase 3 trials

Efficacy and Safety of Alirocumab in Patients with Hypercholesterolemia not on Statin Therapy: the ODYSSEY CHOICE II Study

ABSTRACT. n engl j med 372;16 nejm.org april 16,

GSK Medicine: Study Number: Title: Rationale: Phase: Study Period: Study Design: Centres: Indication: Treatment: Objectives:

PCSK9 inhibition across a wide spectrum of patients: One size fits all?

Efficacy, Safety and Tolerability of 150 mg Q2W Dose of the PCSK9 mab REGN727/SAR236553: Data from Three Phase 2 Studies

John J.P. Kastelein MD PhD Professor of Medicine Dept. of Vascular Medicine Academic Medial Center / University of Amsterdam

Kenneth W. Mahaffey, MD and Keith AA Fox, MB ChB

Alirocumab for the treatment of primary hypercholesterolaemia and mixed dyslipidaemia

Study 2 ( ) Pivotal Phase 3 Study Top-Line Results. October 29, 2018

STABILITY Stabilization of Atherosclerotic plaque By Initiation of darapladib TherapY. Harvey D White on behalf of The STABILITY Investigators

Making War on Cholesterol with New Weapons: How Low Can We/Should We Go? Shaun Goodman

FOURIER STUDY GREYLOCK PRESS: CTS PRODUCT SAMPLE - FOURIER YES. Did the study achieve its main objective?

Disclosure. Financial disclosure: National Advisory Board & Research Grant from Boehringer-Ingelheim

Effect of the PCSK9 Inhibitor Evolocumab on Cardiovascular Outcomes

After acute coronary syndromes patients continue to have recurrent ischemic events despite revascularization and dual antiplatelet therapy

Expert Meeting on Large Simple Trials (LST s)

Case Study. Case Study. Case Study

New evidences in heart failure: the GISSI-HF trial. Aldo P Maggioni, MD ANMCO Research Center Firenze, Italy

PCSK9 antibodies: A new therapeutic option for the treatment of hypercholesterolemia

Get a Statin or Not? Learning objectives. Presentation overview 4/3/2018. Treatment Strategies in Dyslipidemia Management

March 30, 2014, Joint ACC/JAMA Late-breaking Clinical Trials Session 402 American College of Cardiology, Washington DC

Drug Class Monograph

PCSK9 Inhibitors: A View of Clinical Studies

Does High-Intensity Pitavastatin Therapy Further Improve Clinical Outcomes?

Randomized Comparison of the Safety, Tolerability, and Efficacy of Long-term Administration of AMG 145: 52-Week Results From the OSLER Study

Clinical Efficacy and Safety of Achieving Very Low LDL-C Levels With the PCSK9 Inhibitor Evolocumab in the FOURIER Outcomes Trial

Sponsor Novartis. Generic Drug Name Fluvastatin. Therapeutic Area of Trial Dyslipidemia

PCSK9 Agents Drug Class Prior Authorization Protocol

Anne Carol Goldberg, MD, FACP, FAHA, FNLA Washington University, St. Louis, MO USA

PCSK9 Inhibitors: Promise or Pitfall?

Patient Lists. Epic ABOUT THIS GUIDE INDICATIONS AND USAGE IMPORTANT SAFETY INFORMATION. Please see accompanying full Prescribing Information

*Carbohydrate & Lipid Metabolism Research Unit, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa

Patient Action Sets. Allscripts Touchworks ABOUT THIS GUIDE INDICATIONS AND USAGE IMPORTANT SAFETY INFORMATION

Prevention of Cardiovascular Events in Patients With Prior Heart Attack Using Ticagrelor Compared to Placebo on a Background of Aspirin

Saudi Arabia February Pr Michel KOMAJDA. Université Pierre et Marie Curie Hospital Pitié Salpétrière

EBBINGHAUS: - A Cognitive Study of Patients Enrolled in the FOURIER Trial

MS Sabatine, RP Giugliano, AC Keech, PS Sever, SA Murphy and TR Pedersen, for the FOURIER Steering Committee & Investigators

Should I use statins?

Effect of alirocumab on the frequency of lipoprotein apheresis: A randomised Phase III trial

Patient List Inquiries

New Strategies for Lowering LDL - Are They Really Worth It?

SYNOPSIS 2/198 CSR_BDY-EFC5825-EN-E02. Name of company: TABULAR FORMAT (For National Authority Use only)

Canakinumab Anti-Inflammatory Thrombosis Outcomes Study (CANTOS)

Accepted Manuscript. S (18) Reference: JACL To appear in:

Managing Dyslipidemia in Disclosures. Learning Objectives 03/05/2018. Speaker Disclosures

4 th and Goal To Go How Low Should We Go? :

Patient Lists. Allscripts Professional ABOUT THIS GUIDE INDICATIONS AND USAGE IMPORTANT SAFETY INFORMATION

PCSK9 for LDL Cholesterol Reduction: What have we learned from clinical trials?

Experiences with interim trial monitoring, particularly with early stopped trials

Evolving Concepts on Lipid Management from Ezetimibe (IMPROVE IT) to PCSK9 Inhibitors

What Role do the New PCSK9 Inhibitors Have in Lipid Lowering Treatment?

The TNT Trial Is It Time to Shift Our Goals in Clinical

Cost-effectiveness of evolocumab (Repatha ) for hypercholesterolemia

Inhibition of PCSK9: The Birth of a New Therapy

Clinical Trial Results Summary Study EN3409-BUP-305

Weigh the benefit of statin treatment: LDL & Beyond

Lipids: new drugs, new trials, new guidelines

Should we prescribe aspirin and statins to all subjects over 65? (Or even all over 55?) Terje R.Pedersen Oslo University Hospital Oslo, Norway

Contemporary management of Dyslipidemia

Clinical Trial Synopsis TL-OPI-516, NCT#

Supplementary Online Content

Presented by Terje R. Pedersen Oslo Disclosure: Research grants and/or speaker- / consulting fees from Merck, MSP, Astra-Zeneca, Pfizer

Study 1 ( ) Pivotal Phase 3 Long-Term Safety Study Top-Line Results

Hyperlipidemia Guidelines: What s New in 2015? Eva Lonn, MD, MSc Professor of Medicine

The clinical trial information provided in this public disclosure synopsis is supplied for informational purposes only.

CHOLESTEROL-LOWERING THERAPHY

Clinical Trial Synopsis TL-OPI-518, NCT#

Safety of Anacetrapib in Patients with or

Reports. NextGen ABOUT THIS GUIDE INDICATIONS AND USAGE IMPORTANT SAFETY INFORMATION. Please see accompanying full Prescribing Information

Common Repatha Documentation Requirements for Patients With Primary Hyperlipidemia and Established CVD 1,2

Characterization of Types and Sizes of Myocardial Infarction Reduced with Evolocumab in FOURIER

Challenges in lipid management

What have We Learned in Dyslipidemia Management Since the Publication of the 2013 ACC/AHA Guideline?

Reducing Inflammation to Reduce Cardiovascular Risk: The Canakinumab Anti-inflammatory Thrombosis Outcomes Study (CANTOS)

(For National Authority Use Only) Name of Study Drug: to Part of Dossier:

Registry Processor Reports

Evan A. Stein 1, David Sullivan 2, Anders G. Olsson 3, Rob Scott 4, Jae B. Kim 4, Allen Xue 4, Thomas Liu 4, Scott M. Wasserman 4

PCSK9 Inhibitors Are They Worth The Money? Michael J. Blaha MD MPH

Statins and PCSK9 inhibitors for stroke prevention

CORONARY: The Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting Surgery Off or On Pump Revascularization Study. Results at 1 Year

Results of ODYSSEY OUTCOMES Trial

The JUPITER trial: What does it tell us? Alice Y.Y. Cheng, MD, FRCPC January 24, 2009

Praluent (alirocumab)

Novel PCSK9 Outcomes. in Perspective: Lessons from FOURIER & ODYSSEY LDL-C. ASCVD Risk. Suboptimal Statin Therapy

Evolocumab for the treatment of primary hypercholesterolaemia and mixed dyslipidaemia

Protein Convertase Subtilisn/Kexin (PCSK9) Inhibitors Will they live up to the hype? What do I need to know?

Objectives. Conflict of Interest Statement 4/19/2018

ClinicalTrials.gov Protocol Registration and Results System (PRS) Receipt Release Date: 10/11/2013. ClinicalTrials.gov ID: NCT

Design and Analysis of a Cancer Prevention Trial: Plans and Results. Matthew Somerville 09 November 2009

No relevant financial relationships

Sponsor Novartis. Generic Drug Name Vildagliptin/Metformin. Therapeutic Area of Trial Type 2 diabetes. Approved Indication Type 2 diabetes

Guidelines on Lowering LDL-C Levels

Efficacy Study of Zoledronic Acid and Teriparatide Combination Therapy in Women With Osteoporosis

Title A Phase II study of oral LBH589 in adult patients with refractory cutaneous T-Cell lymphoma

Update on Dyslipidemia and Recent Data on Treating the Statin Intolerant Patient

Transcription:

Long-term safety, tolerability and efficacy of alirocumab in high cardiovascular risk patients: ODYSSEY LONG TERM Efficacy by subgroup, and safety when LDL-C <25 mg/dl Jennifer G. Robinson, 1 Michel Farnier, 2 Michel Krempf, 3 Jean Bergeron, 4 Gérald Luc, 5 Maurizio Averna, 6 Erik Stroes, 7 Gisle Langslet, 8 Frederick J. Raal, 9 Mahfouz El Shahawy, 10 Michael J. Koren, 11 Norman Lepor, 12 Christelle Lorenzato, 13 Robert Pordy, 14 Umesh Chaudhari, 15 John J.P. Kastelein 7 1 University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, USA; 2 Point Médical, Dijon, France; 3 CHU de Nantes - Hôpital Nord Laennec, Saint- Herblain, France; 4 Clinique des Maladies Lipidiques de Quebec Inc., Quebec, Canada; 5 University Hospital of Lille, Lille, France; 6 Università di Palermo Policlinico P.Giaccone, Palermo, Italy; 7 Department of Vascular Medicine, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; 8 Lipid Clinic, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway; 9 University of Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa; 10 Cardiovascular Center of Sarasota, Sarasota, FL, USA; 11 Jacksonville Center For Clinical Research, Jacksonville, FL, USA; 12 Westside Medical Associates of Los Angeles, Beverly Hills, CA, USA; 13 Sanofi, Chilly-Mazarin, France; 14 Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Tarrytown, NY, USA; 15 Sanofi, Bridgewater, NJ, USA This study was funded by Sanofi and Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc.

ODYSSEY LONG TERM Study Design HeFH or High CV-risk patients On maximally tolerated statin ± other lipid-lowering therapy LDL-C 70 mg/dl R n=1553 n=788 Double-blind treatment (18 months) 150 mg Q2W SC (single 1 ml injection using prefilled syringe for self-administration) Q2W SC Follow-up (8 weeks) Assessments W0 W4 W8 W12 W16 W24 W36 W52 W64 W78 Primary efficacy endpoint Pre-specified analysis Efficacy: All patients up to W52 (ITT) Safety: All patients randomized and treated 2 85.8% (2009/2341) completed 52 weeks (both treatment arms) 26.1% (405/1553 alirocumab) and 25.6% (202/788 placebo) had completed 78 weeks by time of this analysis Mean treatment duration: 65 weeks (both treatment arms) ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01507831.

Baseline Characteristics All pts on background of maximally tolerated statin ± other lipid-lowering therapy (n=1553) (n=788) Age, years, mean (SD) 60.4 (10.4) 60.6 (10.4) Male, % (n) 63.3% (983) 60.2% (474) Race, White 92.8% (1441) 92.6% (730) BMI, kg/m 2, mean (SD) 30.2 (5.7) 30.5 (5.5) HeFH, % (n) 17.8% (276) 17.6% (139) CHD history, % (n) 67.9% (1055) 70.1% (552) Type 2 diabetes, % (n) 34.9% (542) 33.9% (267) Any statin, % (n) 99.9% (1552) 99.9% (787) High dose statin, % (n) 46.8% (727) 46.8% (369) Any LLT other than statins, % (n) 28.1% (437) 27.9% (220) Ezetimibe, % (n) 13.9% (216) 15.0% (118) LDL-C, calculated mean (SD), mg/dl 122.7 (42.6) 121.9 (41.4) Patients should receive either rosuvastatin 20-40 mg, atorvastatin 40-80 mg daily, or simvastatin 80 mg daily unless not tolerated and/or appropriate other dose given according to the judgement of the investigator 3 High dose statin: atorvastatin 40-80 mg, rosuvastatin 20-40 mg, or simvastatin 80 mg daily.

Maintained Consistent LDL-C Reductions Over 52 Weeks Achieved LDL-C Over Time All patients on background of maximally tolerated statin ± other lipid-lowering therapy Calculated LDL-C, LS mean (SE), mg/dl 140 120 100 80 60 40 20 0 118.9 mg/dl (+0.8%) 48.3 mg/dl ( 61.0%) Week Difference 61.9% 123.0 mg/dl (+4.4%) 53.1 mg/dl ( 56.8%) 0 4 8 12 16 24 36 52 Difference 61.3% 4 Intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis

Effects on LDL-C Consistent Regardless of HeFH Status All patients on background of maximally tolerated statin ± other lipid-lowering therapy Interaction p-value 0.6038 5 LS mean (SE) % change from baseline to Week 24 20 10 0-10 -20-30 -40-50 -60-70 HeFH population -56.3% 63.2% 7.0% Non-HeFH population n=271 n=145 n=1259 n=635-62.1% 61.5% -0.5% LS mean difference vs placebo: LS mean absolute LDL-C reduction, mg/dl: -72.7 11.9-74.5-7.0

Consistent Effects on LDL-C Across a Range of Baseline LDL-C Values All patients on background of maximally tolerated statin ±other lipid-lowering therapy Interaction p-value <0.0001 6 LS mean (SE) % change from baseline to Week 24 20 10 0-10 -20-30 -40-50 -60-70 LS mean difference vs placebo: LS mean absolute LDL-C reduction, mg/dl: <100 mg/dl 100 to 130 to <130 mg/dl <160 mg/dl 13.6% 0.5% -5.2% 160 mg/dl n=470 n=241 n=562 n=285 n=271 n=143 n=227 n=111-61.3% -62.0% -59.8% -59.5% 75.0% -18.2% 62.5% 54.6% 41.3% -51.6 9.5-71.2 0.0-85.3-7.6-115.8-33.7

Efficacy Observed Across Baseline PCSK9 Levels All patients on background of maximally tolerated statin ± other lipid-lowering therapy Interaction p-value <0.0001 Below median At or above median 7 LS mean (SE) % change from baseline to Week 24 20 10 0-10 -20-30 -40-50 -60-70 LS mean difference vs placebo: n=736 n=376 n=740 n=381 5.5% -2.8% -60.1% -62.2% 57.3% 67.3%

Efficacy Observed in Both Genders All patients on background of maximally tolerated statin ± other lipid-lowering therapy Interaction p-value 0.0014 Male Female LS mean (SE) % change from baseline to Week 24 10 0-10 -20-30 -40-50 -60 n=967 n=471 n=563 n=309 3.2% -0.7% -53.4% 8-70 LS mean difference vs placebo: -65.5% 64.7% 56.6%

9 Efficacy Comparable Across Various Subgroups Difference (alirocumab vs. placebo) in LDL-C % Change from Baseline to W24 Subgroup Interaction n LS mean n LS mean p-value Overall 1530-61.0 780 0.8 Race 0.2227 White 1419-61.6 722 0.8 Black/African American 53-49.5 24 4.3 Age 0.1313 <65 963-60.4 498-0.1 65 to <75 442-62.9 221 3.0 75 125-59.5 61 0.5 BMI 0.3396 <30 852-61.5 406 1.3 30 674-60.3 371 0.1 Moderate CKD 0.0210 Yes 73-62.0 174 8.7 No 1356-60.9 707 0.0 Diabetes 0.0957 Yes 545-60.0 273-1.0 No 985-61.6 507 1.8 Baseline fasting TGs, mg/dl 0.3431 <150 928-58.8 450 2.2 150 602-64.5 329-1.1 All patients on background of maximally tolerated statin ±other lipid-lowering therapy -80-60 -40-20 0 LS mean difference vs. placebo (95% CI)

Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events % (n) of patients All pts on background of maximal statin therapy ± other lipidlowering therapy (n=1550) with 2 consecutive LDL cholesterol <25 mg/dl (n = 562) (n=788) TEAEs 78.6% (1218) 71.9% (404) 80.6% (635) Treatment-emergent SAEs TEAE leading to death TEAEs leading to treatment discontinuation 16.5% (255) 14.6% (82) 17.6% (139) 0.5% (7) 0.5% (3) 1.0% (8) 6.2% (96) 3.6% (20) 5.5% (43) 10 Mean exposure: 65 weeks (both treatment arms) 26.1% (405/1553 alirocumab) and 25.6% (202/788 placebo) completed the 18-month double-blind treatment period TEAEs, treatment-emergent adverse events. Completed = 76 weeks exposure and W78 visit performed.

TEAEs ( 2%) in any Group Comparable in Patients With 2 Consecutive LDL-C <25 mg/dl % (n) of patients All pts on background of maximally tolerated statin ± other lipidlowering therapy (n=1550) with 2 consecutive LDL-C <25 mg/dl (n=562, 37%) (n=788) Nasopharyngitis 12.6% (196) 10.0% (56) 12.7% (100) URTI 7.0% (109) 5.7% (32) 8.0% (63) Injection site reaction c 5.7% (89) 3.6% (20) 4.3% (34) Influenza 5.4% (84) 4.1% (23) 5.5% (43) Diarrhea 5.3% (82) 3.9% (22) 5.1% (40) Urinary tract infection 5.2% (81) 5.5% (31) 6.2% (49) Bronchitis 5.2% (80) 5.2% (29) 4.7% (37) Myalgia 4.9% (76) 3.0% (17) 3.0% (24) Headache 4.8% (74) 1.8% (10) 5.6% (44) Back pain 4.7% (73) 5.0% (28) 6.0% (47) Arthralgia 4.5% (70) 3.2% (18) 6.0% (47) Muscle spasms 3.7% (58) 2.8% (16) 3.2% (25) Fatigue 3.0% (47) 3.0% (17) 3.8% (30) Pain in extremity 3.0% (46) 2.1% (12) 4.4% (35) Hypertension 3.5% (54) 2.0% (11) 3.4% (27) % (n) of patients All pts on background of maximally tolerated statin ± other lipidlowering therapy (n=1550) with 2 consecutive LDL-C <25 mg/dl (n=562, 37%) (n=788) Cough 3.2% (49) 2.0% (11) 2.2% (17) LRTI 3.0% (46) 2.8% (16) 2.9% (23) Fall 2.8% (43) 1.6% (9) 4.1% (32) Sinusitis 2.6% (40) 3.0% (17) 2.4% (19) Dizziness 2.5% (38) 1.4% (8) 3.7% (29) Gastroenteritis 2.4% (37) 0.7% (4) 2.8% (22) Nausea 2.4% (37) 0.9% (5) 2.5% (20) Musculoskeletal pain 2.3% (36) 1.4% (8) 1.9% (15) Osteoarthritis 2.3% (35) 2.1% (12) 3.0% (24) Contusion 2.3% (35) 1.2% (7) 0.8% (6) Angina pectoris 2.1% (32) 1.8% (10) 2.9% (23) Depression 1.8% (28) 1.4% (8) 3.2% (25) Non-cardiac chest pain 1.8% (28) 2.0% (11) 1.9% (15) Type 2 diabetes mellitus 1.7% (27) 2.5% (14) 1.3% (10) Rhinitis 1.4% (22) 1.2% (7) 2.2% (17) Atrial fibrillation 1.4% (22) 1.6% (9) 2.2% (17) 11

TEAEs of Interest Comparable in Patients With 2 Consecutive LDL-C <25 mg/dl % (n) of patients All pts on background of maximally tolerated statin ± other lipid-lowering therapy (n=1550) with 2 consecutive LDL-C <25 mg/dl (n=562) (n=788) General allergic reaction events* 9.0% (140) 6.0% (34) 9.0% (71) Treatment-emergent local injection site reactions 5.8% (90) 3.7% (21) 4.3% (34) Neurological events 4.2% (65) 1.8% (10) 3.9% (31) All cardiovascular events 4.0% (62) 3.2% (18) 4.4% (35) Ophthalmological events 2.5% (38) 1.8% (10) 1.9% (15) Neurocognitive disorders 1.2% (18) 0.5% (3) 0.5% (4) Haemolytic anaemia 0 0 0 12 Safety Analysis (at least 52 weeks for all patients continuing treatment, including 607 patients overall who completed W78 visit) * 1 alirocumab-treated patient diagnosed with Miller Fisher Syndrome at week 27 after typical prodromal gastroenteritis, he had a complete recovery following treatment discontinuation; at week 24 the patient had low LDL-C, reaching 1.5 mg/dl. Confirmed by adjudication. Adjudicated CV events include all CV AEs positively adjudicated. The adjudication categories are the following: CHD death, non-fatal MI, fatal and non-fatal ischemic stroke, unstable angina requiring hospitalization, congestive heart failure requiring hospitalization, ischemia driven coronary revascularization procedure [PCI, CABG]. Company MedDRA Queries (CMQ).

Cumulative probability of event Post-hoc Adjudicated Cardiovascular TEAEs Pooled from Phase 3 -controlled Trials Kaplan-Meier Estimates for Time to First Adjudicated Major CV Event Pooled Safety Analysis from five Phase 3 placebo-controlled trials (N=3459) (at least 52 weeks for all patients continuing treatment) No. at Risk 13 0.06 0.05 0.04 0.03 0.02 0.01 0.00 0 1174 2318 12 1160 2294 + max-tolerated statin ± other LLT + max-tolerated statin ± other LLT Cox model analysis: HR=0.65 (95% CI: 0.40 to 1.08) Nominal p-value = 0.0985 24 1098 2171 36 1057 2087 48 1026 2030 Mean baseline LDL-C (mg/dl): :126.0 to 129.1; placebo, 125.4 to 129.9 Mean percent change in LDL-C from baseline to W24:, 48.6 to 60.4%; placebo, 4.3 to 0.5% Mean on-treatment LDL-C difference: 70.5 to 72.6 mg/dl 60 862 1713 Primary endpoint for the ODYSSEY OUTCOMES trial: CHD death, Non-fatal MI, Fatal and non-fatal ischemic stroke, Unstable angina requiring hospitalization. LLT, lipid-lowering therapy 72 349 698 84 127 252 Weeks

Conclusions: ODYSSEY LONG TERM Largest double-blind study of a PCSK9 inhibitor Current analysis provides ~1900 patient-years of double-blind patient exposure to alirocumab 150 mg Q2W In high CV-risk patients on maximal statin therapy ± other LLT: Self-administered alirocumab produced significantly greater LDL-C reductions vs. placebo at W24 (LS mean difference 62%) 79% of alirocumab pts achieved LDL-C <70 mg/dl at W24 LDL-C reductions with alirocumab observed by W4, with mean achieved LDL-C levels of 53 mg/dl at W52 Significant LDL-C reductions occurred across various subgroups TEAEs generally comparable in alirocumab and placebo arms, and in 562 pts with 2 consecutive LDL-C <25 mg/dl 14

Thank you to all principal investigators and national coordinators! Canada: 14 sites Europe: 154 sites Belgium: 4 sites; Bulgaria: 9 sites; Czech Rep.: 3 sites; Denmark: 5 sites; Finland: 4 sites; France: 12 sites; Germany: 15 sites; Hungary: 10 sites; Italy: 8 sites; Netherlands: 12 sites; Norway: 5 sites; Poland: 9 sites; Portugal: 4 sites; Romania: 4 sites; Russia: 7 sites; Spain: 8 sites; Sweden: 5 sites; Ukraine: 11 sites; UK: 19 sites USA: 115 sites Israel: 4 sites Central/South America: 22 sites Argentina: 6 sites Chile: 4 sites Colombia: 5 sites Mexico: 7 sites South Africa: 11 sites 320 sites worldwide 15