Manojkumar Choudhary 1, Roma Solomon, Jitendra Awale and Rina Dey

Similar documents
Dr. Roma Solomon, CORE India Director

Ensuring the quality of polio outbreak response activities: A rationale and guide for 3 month, quarterly and 6 month independent assessments

William M Weiss 1*, Manojkumar Choudhary 2 and Roma Solomon 2

Achieving Polio Eradication in India. Emergency Preparedness and Response Plan 2011

Polio Eradication in India. Dr Sunil Bahl Deputy Project Manager WHO Country Office for India 28 October 2014

FY2017 Q1: CORE Group Polio Project (CGPP) Quarterly Update

BEST PRACTICES IN MICROPLANNING FOR CHILDREN OUT OF THE HOUSEHOLD: AN EXAMPLE FROM NORTHERN NIGERIA

CORE GROUP POLIO PROJECT

Poliomyelitis eradication in the WHO European Region

Midterm Review of the Global Measles and Rubella Strategic Plan W. A. Orenstein, MD SAGE Geneva, 19 October 2016

FY2018 Q1: CORE Group Polio Project (CGPP) Global Quarterly Update from October through December 2017.

Report. 10 th Meeting of the Expert Review Committee (ERC) on Polio Eradication in Nigeria

ANNEX Page. AFR/RC61/11 4 July 2011 ORIGINAL: ENGLISH REGIONAL COMMITTEE FOR AFRICA

IEAG Findings 5-6 December 2005

2016 NON FINANCIAL RESOURCE REQUIREMENTS GPEI DONOR CONTRIBUTIONS

topv to bopv FACTSHEET 25 APRIL 2016

Public Disclosure Copy

Global measles and polio initiative

Ex Post-Evaluation Brief India: Polio Immunisation Programme, Phases I to VII

POLIOMYELITIS ERADICATION: PROGRESS REPORT. Information Document CONTENTS BACKGROUND PROGRESS MADE NEXT STEPS... 12

Update on Status of Wild Poliovirus Outbreak in Kenya. 9 th Meeting of the IMB 1-3 October 2013 London, UK

Polio and routine immunisation Alan Brooks

Media centre Statement on the 7th IHR Emergency Committee meeting regarding the international spread of poliovirus

For information on programmes in other countries and regions please access the Federation website at Programme title 2005

MARA referral M&E Framework with recommended indicators & sources of data

Accelerating Emergency Polio Eradication Activities. SAGE, November 6, 2012

WHO Consultation on universal access to core malaria interventions in high burden countries: main conclusions and recommendations

Routine Immunization Coverage Survey

FISCAL YEAR 2020 APPROPRIATIONS REQUESTS (updated ) USAID Global Health Programs (GHP) and State Department

FINAL REPORT. 24th Meeting of the Expert Review Committee (ERC) On Polio Eradication & Routine Immunization in Nigeria.

Global Polio Eradication, Progress, Impact of Ebola, Risks & Opportunities. Polio Partners Group 8 December 2014

Polio post-certification strategy

International PolioPlus Committee PolioPlus Facts and Figures June Rotary s financial contribution to the polio eradication effort:

Meeting of the Polio Oversight Board (call) 1 September :00 am 11:00 am Meeting Minutes

Countdown to 2015: tracking progress, fostering accountability

Papua Maternal, Newborn and Child Health and Nutrition Project

HEALTH ORGANISATIONS. National Health Programme

Report on the Evaluation of Child Supplementary Feeding Programme Implemented from October 1999 to June 2000 in three districts in Zimbabwe

Polio and measles control: opportunities and threats for health systems

Global Polio Partners Group Monitoring Framework for the GPEI Polio Eradication & Endgame Strategic Plan

Report on MCSP Support for the Polio Switch in April 2016

BULLETIN. World Health Organization, Western Pacific Regional Office, Manila, Philippines Issue 8 January 2006 ISSN

EUROPEAN COMMISSION DIRECTORATE-GENERAL FOR HUMANITARIAN AID - ECHO. Emergency Humanitarian Aid Decision

Addendum to IPV Introduction Guidelines based on Recommendations of India Expert Advisory Group (IEAG)

Reasons for vaccine acceptance: parents and girls perspectives

RESIDENT / HUMANITARIAN COORDINATOR REPORT ON THE USE OF CERF FUNDS KENYA RAPID RESPONSE POLIO

Objective 2 Strengthening Routine Immunization, IPV introduction and the topv-bopv switch

Oral Polio Vaccine Supply Outlook. UNICEF Supply Division

Technical Guidance for Global Fund HIV Proposals

ERADICATING POLIO. Working with community influencers for catalyzing change

3. CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

Syndromic Surveillance in Integrated Disease Surveillance Project (IDSP) and Pre Hospital Emergency Care in India

Progress reports on selected Regional Committee resolutions:

Draft Report Meeting of the Technical Advisory Group on Poliomyelitis Eradication in Afghanistan and Pakistan Cairo, 3-4 February 2008

Progress Towards Global Polio Eradication by 2012: Progress and Ongoing Challenges

Operational Guidelines for Transit Strategy during Polio SIAs

increased efficiency. 27, 20

AFRICA - MEASLES AND POLIO REDUCTION Appeal No /2003; Appeal Target: CHF 4,210,000 Programme Update No. 1; Period covered: January July, 2003

Government of Bangladesh

Malaria Control in Togo

Report to the. GAVI Alliance Board June 2013

The Project Area and Beneficiaries. Reproductive & Child Health (II) Programme PROGRAMME ON HEALTH

3/25/2018. End Polio Now an Update. Type 3 has not been seen since The Polio Virus. Polio What is it and Where did it Originate?

EDITORIAL Contributing Towards Polio Eradication in Ethiopia

7.5 South-East Asian Region: summary of planned activities, impact and costs

INDIA S THREE YEAR POLIO FREE ANNIVERSARY PARTNER TOOLKIT

10 th Annual African Vaccinology Course (AAVC) Cape Town 10 November 2014

POLIO ERADICATION AND POST-CERTIFICATION STRATEGY

Ex post evaluation India

Global Partners' Group

The role of international agencies in addressing critical priorities: the example of Born On Time

Report to the Board June 2015

UNICEF support to POSHAN Abhiyaan Improving delivery of high impact Nutrition Interventions

In the Name of God, the Compassionate, the Merciful. Address by DR HUSSEIN A. GEZAIRY REGIONAL DIRECTOR WHO EASTERN MEDITERRANEAN REGION.

KURUKSHETRA JULY 2017 RURAL HEALTH

Challenges of building a new vaccine delivery platform for LMICs

Report of the Polio WG Meeting February Dr. Peter Figueroa Co-Chair, SAGE Polio Working Group 17 April, 2018

CGPP Kenya and Somalia Weekly Project Implementation Updates 8-14 October, 2018 (week 41)

Polio & routine immunisation Alan Brooks

23rd Meeting of the India Expert Advisory Group for Polio Eradication (IEAG) Delhi, India, July Conclusions and Recommendations

COUNTRY PROFILE: INDIA INDIA COMMUNITY HEALTH PROGRAMS NOVEMBER 2013

M&E for Accountability & Global Progress Tracking

The 8 th African Vaccination Week Report. Akobo County, South Sudan. Vaccines Work. Do Your Part!

Pakistan & Afghanistan: Will we soon see the end of polio?

Impact of Immunization on Under 5 Mortality

Tajikistan: Poliomyelitis

INDIA COMMUNICATION UPDATE CONTENTS. Where the battle is One P2. Father turns polio advocate P3

Strategy and documentation of the measles and rubella elimination in the WHO Regional Office for Europe

Pakistan Polio Program Update. Independent Monitoring Board, July 2016

HIV and AIDS stigma and discrimination reduction through raising awareness in Kabul city, Afghanistan

ERADICATING POLIO. Getting to zero resistance

HEALTH SYSTEM STRENGTHENING UNDER THE NATIONAL RURAL HEALTH MISSION (NRHM) IN INDIA

Advocates Rights Actors Justice for

Table 1: Basic information ,000, (per 1,000 LB) 34.6 (per 1,000 LB) 174 (per 100,000 LB) District 712.

Fact sheet. Poliomyelitis. WHO Media centre. ADAPTED FOR ADDITION TO THE RHIZOME POLIOK.IT PLATFORM 16 Jan 2017 INFORMATION FOR ERADICATION FROM

GAVI Role in IPV Introductions

Changing Behaviour: Creating Sanitation Change Leaders An initiative towards changing behaviours. Project Presentation

Measles Outbreak Response in Zimbabwe

midterm evaluation summary ReMiND Project

22nd Meeting of the India Expert Advisory Group for Polio Eradication Delhi, India, 1-2 November Conclusions and Recommendations

Transcription:

Opening every door - reaching the last child with OPV in Uttar Pradesh, India: Role of management information system in social and behaviour change communication programmes Manojkumar Choudhary 1, Roma Solomon, Jitendra Awale and Rina Dey Abstract Background: In 1999, introduction of house-to-house oral polio vaccine (OPV) immunization under the polio eradication initiative in India revealed community-level resistance to OPV vaccine. Responding to this, the USAID-funded CORE Group Polio Project (CGPP) initiated a variety of social mobilisation (SM) and behaviour change communication (BCC) activities in Uttar Pradesh, India. This paper describes the contribution of a Management Information System (MIS) towards implementing SM and BCC activities for polio eradication. Methods: In 2012, CGPP India engaged an independent expert to assess the quality of project processes, including BCC and the Management Information System (MIS). He performed a desk review of data collection protocols, reports and related publications; and conducted in-depth interviews with project functionaries, community members and other stakeholders. Results: SM and BCC activities reliant on epidemiological and social science data are crucial for the polio eradication programme for several reasons (e.g. identification of every eligible child). A unique aspect of CGPP strategies is the effective utilisation of MIS in the implementation of BCC strategies. CGPP-India MIS contributes to SM and BCC strategies by generating real time information on the following four key items: all potential beneficiaries for vaccination; behaviour of each family; location of resistant families; and, the underlying cause of resistance. Having identified resistant families, CGPP India functionaries use the MIS information to identify individuals in the community who could influence each resistant parent. This influencer then visits the family repeatedly. Where the MIS-based influencers' action was used, there was a measurable increase in polio vaccination coverage, reduction in resistant cases, and increase in routine immunisation coverage. Conclusions: The CGPP MIS increases the effectiveness of BCC and SM interventions in service of polio eradication, and it can be adapted for other health services such as routine immunization where problem detection and follow-up are necessary. KEY WORDS: Social mobilisation (SM), Behaviour Change Communication (BCC), Management Information System (MIS), Polio Eradication, CORE Group Polio Project (CGPP) 1 Presenter; correspondence: manojcgpp@gmail.com CGPP India Secretariat, CORE Group Polio Project India, 303 Radisson Suites, Commercial Tower, B- Block, Sushant Lok I, Gurgaon 122002, Haryana, India

Background: Worldwide, the number of confirmed wild poliovirus has reduced drastically from an estimated 350,000 in 1988 to 223 cases in 2012 [1]. As of 18 October 2013, the total number of 2013 wild polio cases worldwide was 296 and there was no case (zero case) of wild poliovirus reported from India [2]. Since January 2011, India has not reported any wild poliovirus. Although India interrupted transmission of wild poliovirus, India remains at risk of an importation from neighbouring countries like Pakistan, Afghanistan and beyond. The majority of wild polio cases in India have been from the states of Uttar Pradesh (UP) and Bihar. The strategy to interrupt transmission of wild poliovirus in India involves frequent supplemental immunization activities (SIAs or mass campaigns) in high-risk districts and blocks as well as high quality surveillance and high routine immunization coverage. During an SIA, Oral Polio Vaccine (OPV) is given to all children in the age group of 0 5 years as a part of the polio eradication program. The yearly frequency of SIAs in India varies from 4 12 and the extent can range from a district to an entire state up to the entire country [4]. In 1999, introduction of house-to-house OPV immunization under the polio eradication initiative in India generated community-level resistance. As a response, the CORE Group Polio Project (CGPP) initiated a variety of social mobilisation (SM) and behaviour change communication (BCC) activities in UP. Grassroots SM efforts, including those of the CGPP and Social Mobilization Network (SM Net), have been effective in reaching underserved populations during SIAs and combating rumors against polio vaccination [4]. The CORE Group is an umbrella organization of nongovernmental organizations (NGOs) that collaborate on international health and development programs. In India, the CGPP (Consortium of Adventist Development & Relief Agency (ADRA) India, Project Concern International (PCI) and Catholic Relief Services (CRS), as well as their ten local NGO partners), with funding from the US Agency for International Development (USAID), works across twelve districts in the state of UP. Figure 1 presents locations of CGPP sites (project districts) in India. CGPP is a member of the Social Mobilization Network (SM Net) in UP that also includes UNICEF, Rotary, the Indian Government s and WHO s National Polio Surveillance Project (NPSP). This network was created in 2003 and supports polio eradication by identifying high-risk areas and working with underserved communities in planning, implementing and monitoring social mobilization for polio. The primary effort of the SM Net is carried out by a three-level network of community mobilizers (community - CMCs, block - BMCs and district - DMCs) [5]. The CGPP focuses on targeting the most communication-challenged populations. The project reaches these populations by systematic enumeration and tracking of children less than five years, and through highly targeted social mobilization strategies that rely on direct personal communication with families and with informal and formal community leaders [5]. An extensive network of 1,300 Community Mobilization Coordinators (CMCs) conduct social mobilization activities for behavior change related to polio vaccination. The CMC interacts with families and community members at the village level. As the backbone of the SM Net, s/he is assigned responsibility for mobilizing about 500 households in either a rural or an urban area and keeps records of the 2

immunization status of all children less than five years of age in those households [5]. During SIA (Supplementary Immunization Activity) rounds, CMCs assist vaccinators in setting up vaccination booths, organize groups of child mobilizers (Bulawwa tollies) and arrange for mosque and/or temple announcements. They also accompany vaccinator teams to all the houses; work to convince families with an unvaccinated child (called an X household) to allow her/him to be vaccinated (Converting an X household to P - denoting a house where all eligible children are vaccinated against polio) and, accompany persons of influence (influencers) during follow-up activities [3]. In between the SIA Rounds, the CMC carries out activities aimed at increasing OPV coverage. S/he visits houses, talking to mothers and other caregivers, dispelling their doubts or rumors about the vaccine. S/he holds mothers meetings to discuss children s health issues and explains prevention and management of common illnesses [3]. For more details about the polio eradication activities of the CGPP India, see Weiss et al. (2011, 2013a & 2013b). This paper describes the contribution of a Management Information System (MIS) towards implementing SM and BCC activities for polio eradication. Methods: This paper is based on previous publications of CGPP and process documentation by an external professional. In 2012, CGPP India engaged an independent public health expert to rapidly assess the quality and document the various processes of the project, including SM, BCC and MIS. He performed a desk review of data collection protocols, reports and related publications, conducted in-depth interviews with project functionaries, NGO heads, community members, religious leaders, government officials and project partners. He also observed some of the crucial activities like household visits by project functionaries. The MIS was assessed by studying the process of data collection and flow, processing analysis and feedback systems established in the project. The outcome of the MIS on management was evaluated during field visits by assessing the use of this information in the planning, implementation, supervision, monitoring and concurrent evaluation of the CGPP. Results: SM and BCC activities reliant on epidemiological and social science data are crucial for the polio eradication programme for several reasons (e.g. identification of every eligible child, identification of households where children could not be vaccinated, etc.). A unique aspect of CGPP strategies is the effective utilisation of MIS in the implementation of BCC strategies. The Monitoring and Evaluation (M&E) system of CGPP India uses prospectively and retrospectively collected information for planning, implementation, monitoring and evaluation of its social mobilization activities. Key input, output and outcome indicators of the project are tracked by internal assessment and external (Project baseline, midline and end line) assessments. Along with a comprehensive MIS, the project also conducts specific investigations using both quantitative and qualitative techniques like LQAS surveys, barrier analysis, etc. 3

Figure 2 describes types of registry and records, information flow and reporting by level of operation. The project MIS generates real time information right from the grass root level. All project records maintain uniformity in collection and consolidation of information. The MIS collects and processes disaggregated information for child tracking, supplemental immunization activities (SIAs), routine immunization, and activity planning by using various types of registry and records. At the community level, CMCs maintain a Child Tracking Register, SIA Register and Planning and Reporting Register. S/he tracks all primary beneficiaries and the disaggregated information generated is further compiled at block, district, sub region and country levels. 4 The CGPP MIS includes most of the programmatic indicators (inputs, outputs and processes) and has been crucial in the planning, implementation, monitoring and evaluation of the BCC and SM components of the programme. The MIS has also been central to striving towards universal OPV coverage of children and has provided the means for assessing the progress of the programme on a monthly basis.

Figure 3 describes the processes and role of MIS in addressing family level resistance to OPV. CGPP India MIS contributes to SM and BCC strategies by generating real time information on the following four key aspects: a) Potential beneficiaries for vaccination MIS tracks all primary beneficiaries (children aged below five years) for vaccination during SIAs and routine immunization. b) Behaviour of each family Vaccination related behaviour of each household in CGPP catchment area is tracked by specifying the SIA wise vaccination status of each child c) Location of resistant families - The CMCs identify households that have the potential for resistance or are known to be resistant to having their child vaccinated against polio d) Underlying cause(s) of resistance - CMCs investigate the reason(s) behind refusal of each resistant family 5 Having identified resistant or potentially resistant families, CGPP India functionaries (CMCs/BMCs) use MIS in the identification of individuals (influencers) in the community who could influence such parents. The CGPP functionary, along with the influencer (Identified on the basis of the MIS), visits the family repeatedly till acceptance. Figure 4 presents the trend in the number of houses missed during SIAs due to resistance in catchment areas of CGPP India. It is obvious that the number of resistant houses has significantly decreased from 821 in November 2007 to 222 in September 2013. Also, where influencers were used, there was a measurable increase in polio vaccination coverage, reduction in resistant cases and increase in routine immunisation coverage.

Conclusions: For a health programme that aims at universal coverage, it is imperative to collect disaggregated information on the total target population and its distribution by household. This provides the denominator which is crucial for monitoring the coverage of the target population with services and the identification of individuals that are not covered at any given point in time. For a behaviour specific communication program, it is necessary to collect information on the households where the desired behaviour is not occurring and determine the underlying reasons. The CGPP India demonstrated that community based health workers (CMCs) are capable of making behavioural diagnoses and dealing with negative behaviour if they are provided with simple protocols and the necessary skills to use them. The CGPP MIS supports programme implementation teams in effective management (planning, implementation, monitoring, supervision and evaluation) of BCC and SM interventions (from community to district level) for polio eradication. It can be adapted for other health services such as routine immunization, childhood illnesses and TB control programmes where problem detection and follow-up are necessary. References 6 1. WHO: Media Centre, Poliomyelitis, Fact sheet No. 114, April 2013; http://www.who.int/mediacentre/factsheets/fs114/en/ 2. WHO: AFP/polio case count; http://apps.who.int/immunization_monitoring/en/diseases/poliomyelitis/afpextract.cfm. Accessed: 27 October 2013. 3. Weiss WM, Rahman MH, Solomon R, Singh V, Ward D: Outcomes of polio eradication activities in Uttar Pradesh, India: the Social Mobilization Network (SM Net) and Core Group Polio Project (CGPP). BMC Infect Dis 2011, 11:117. 4. Weiss WM, Rahman MH, Solomon R, Ward D: Determinants of performance of supplemental immunization activities for polio eradication in Uttar Pradesh, India: social mobilization activities of the Social mobilization Network (SM Net) and Core Group Polio Project (CGPP). BMC Infect Dis 2013, 13:17. 5. Weiss WM, Choudhary M, Solomon R: Performance and determinants of routine immunization coverage within the context of intensive polio eradication activities in Uttar Pradesh, India: Social Mobilization Network (SM Net) and Core Group Polio Project (CGPP). BMC International Health and Human Rights 2013 13:25.