Evolution of Therapy in HCV

Similar documents
EASL 2013 Interferon Free, All Oral Regimens for Hepatitis C. Maria Buti Hospital Universitario Valle Hebron Barcelona Spain

Hepatitis C Treatment 2014

Introduction. The ELECTRON Trial

Update on the Treatment of HCV

VII CURSO AVANCES EN INFECCIÓN VIH Y HEPATITIS VIRALES

Update in the Management of Hepatitis C: What Does the Future Hold

Treatments of Genotype 2, 3,and 4: Now and in the future

Rome, February nd Riunione Annuale AISF th AISF ANNUAL MEETING

Bristol-Myers Squibb. HCV Full Development Portfolio Overview. Richard Bertz Int Workshop CP HIV Meeting Amsterdam, Netherlands 24 April 2013

EASL and The Future of HCV Treatment

Clinical Management: Treatment of HCV Mono-infection

New developments in HCV research and their implications for front-line practice

Interferon-based and interferon-free new treatment options

The Pipeline of New HCV Therapies: What to Expect in the Next 5 Years. Nancy Reau, MD Associate Professor University of Chicago

The HCV Pipeline Ira M. Jacobson, MD, FACP, FACG, AGAF. Slide Presentation. IFN-free DAA combinations (G1)

Highlights of AASLD 2012 CCO Official Conference Coverage of the 2012 Annual Meeting of the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases

NS5A inhibitors: ideal candidates for combination?

Future strategies with new DAAs

Pivotal New England Journal of Medicine papers 2014 Phase 3 Trial data

HCV Treatment of Genotype 1: Now and in the Future

SVR Updates from the 2013 EASL

5/12/2016. Learning Objectives. Management of Hepatitis C Virus Genotype 2 or 3 Infected Treatment-Naive or Experienced Patients

I nuovi farmaci per HCV: frequenza della patologia, evidenze di efficacia e sicurezza, strategie di gestione. la pratica clinica

Antiviral agents in HCV

Emerging Therapies for HCV: Highlights from AASLD 2012 (Part 2)

New Therapeutic Strategies: Polymerase Inhibitors

Case 4: A 61-year-old man with HCV genotype 3 with cirrhosis. Ira M. Jacobson, M.D. Weill Cornell Medical College New York, New York USA

Associate Professor of Medicine University of Chicago

Treatement Experienced patients without cirrhosis. Rafael Esteban Hospital Universitario Valle Hebron Barcelona

IFN-free for Genotype 1 HCV: the current landscape. Prof. Graham R Foster

Direct-acting Antiviral (DAA) Regimens in Late-stage Development: Which Patients Should Wait? Fred Poordad, MD

Program Disclosure. Provider is approved by the California Board of Registered Nursing, Provider #13664, for 1.5 contact hours.

CURRENT TREATMENTS. Mitchell L Shiffman, MD Director Liver Institute of Virginia. Richmond and Newport News, VA, USA

IFN-free therapy in naïve HCV GT1 patients

8/5/2014. A new era of HCV clinical management. Direct-Acting Antivirals for Hepatitis C. Goal of HCV treatment is viral cure HIV HBV HCV

Initial Treatment of HCV G Hugo E. Vargas, MD Professor of Medicine Medical, Director Office of Clinical Research Mayo Clinic Arizona

TREATMENT OF GENOTYPE 2

HCV Treatment Failure: What Next? Dr Ashley Brown, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London

Emerging Therapies for HCV: Highlights from AASLD 2012 (Part 1)

Hepatitis C: Aplicaciones Clínicas de la Resistencia. Eva Poveda Division of Clinical Virology INIBIC-Complexo Hospitalario Universitario de A Coruña

Feeling right at home

Special Contribution Highlights of the 2012 American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases Meeting

Treating HCV Genotype 2 & 3

What is the Optimized Treatment Duration? To Overtreat versus Undertreat. Nancy Reau, MD Associate Professor of Medicine University of Chicago

Hepatitis C in Special Populations

Strategies towards cure of HCV infection: a personalized approach. Heiner Wedemeyer Hannover Medical School Hannover, Germany

Hepatitis C Emerging Treatment Paradigms

The Liver Meeting 2013: The 64th Annual Meeting of the AASLD Washington, DC, November 1 5, 2013 Presentation LB-1

Latest Treatment Updates for GT 2 and GT 3 Patients

Massimo Puoti Dept. of Infectious Diseases AO Ospedale Niguarda Cà Granda

Protease inhibitor based triple therapy in treatment experienced patients

Experience with pre-transplant antiviral treatment: PEG/RBV and DAA. Xavier Forns, MD Liver Unit Hospital Clínic IDIBAPS and CIBREHD Barcelona

Emerging Therapies for HCV: Highlights from AASLD 2012 (Part 2)

HCV Case Study. Treat Now or Wait for New Therapies

Baseline and acquired viral resistance to DAAs: how to test and manage

Dr Janice Main Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London

Update on chronic hepatitis C treatment: current trends, new challenges, what next?

Genotype 1 HCV in 2016: Clinical Decision Making in a Time of Plenty

Tough Cases in HIV/HCV Coinfection

Current Treatment Options for HCV Patients. Michael Manns Dept. of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Endocrinology Hannover Germany

2017 Bruce Lucas Hepatology and Liver Transplant Symposium October 13th 2017 Management of Hepatitis C in Pre- and Post-Transplant Patients

November 2013 AASLD Investor Event 4 November

HEPATITIS C. Mitchell L. Shiffman, MD, FACG Director. Liver Institute of Virginia. Richmond and Newport News, VA

Case 2: A 71-year-old man with cirrhosis

Ed Gane NZ Liver Transplant Unit Auckland City Hospital

Azienda ULSS12 Veneziana

VIRAL LIVER DISEASE. OAG Post DDW Course Westin Prince, Toronto, June 13-14, 2015

New Treatments for Chronic Hepatitis C. Rafael Esteban Hospital Valle Hebron. Barcelona Spain

Interferon Side Effects and The Future of Interferon Sparing Regimens. Todd Wills, MD ETAC Infectious Disease Specialist

Expert Perspectives: Best of HCV from EASL 2015

SYNOPSIS Final Clinical Study Report for Study AI444031

Program Disclosure. Provider is approved by the California Board of Registered Nursing, Provider #13664, for 1.5 contact hours.

Saeed Hamid, MD Alex Thompson, MD, PhD

Hepatitis C Resistance Associated Variants (RAVs)

4/30/2015. Interactive Case-Based Presentations and Audience Discussion. Debika Bhattacharya, MD, MSc. Learning Objectives

The HCV pipeline: Will IFN-free treatment be possible? Heiner Wedemeyer. Hannover Medical School Germany

Ledipasvir-Sofosbuvir (Harvoni)

Transformation of Chronic Hepatitis C Treatment

HCV Resistance Clinical Aspects. Sanjay Bhagani Royal Free Hospital/UCL London

Can a One-Size-Fits-All Approach Be Applied to All Treatment-Naïve GT1 HCV Patients?

How to optimize treatment in G3 patients? Jérôme GOURNAY, MD Hépatologie Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nantes France

Pegylated interferon based therapy with second-wave direct-acting antivirals in genotype 1 chronic hepatitis C

Hepatitis C: New Therapies in

The Egyptian Plan to Cure HCV

HCV Treatment: Why to Wait

HCV: The next 18 months. David L. Wyles, M.D. Associate Professor of Medicine UCSD

Will difficult-to-treat patients remain difficultto-treat. generation of treatments?

Treatment of HCV in 2016

HCV-G3: Sofosbuvir with ledipasvir or daclatasvir?

Why make this statement?

Selecting HCV Treatment

Case. 63 year old woman now with:

HCV Management in Decompensated Cirrhosis: Current Therapies

47 th Annual Meeting AISF

9/21/2014. Sarah Naidoo, PharmD, BCPS September 26, 2014

O. Giouleme Assistant Professor of Gastroenterology Ippokration General Hospital of Thessaloniki

Resistencias & Epidemiología. Eva Poveda Division of Clinical Virology INIBIC-Complexo Hospitalario Universitario de A Coruña

Virological Tools and Monitoring in the DAA Era

Emerging Therapies for HCV: Highlights from AASLD 2012 (Part 1)

HCV Resistance Associated variants: impact on chronic hepatitis C treatment

Transcription:

Hepatitis C: Update on New Therapies and AASLD 13 David Bernstein, MD, FACP, AGAF, FACP Professor of Medicine Hofstra North Shore-LIJ School of Medicine Evolution of Therapy in HCV 199 1999 1 13 (%) SVR 2 1 15 IFN IFN 6m 12m IFN/ 6m 25 IFN/ 12m PEG/ 12m PEG/R/PI 6-12m 1

New Therapies for Genotype 1 IFN IFN Free Naïve Treatment experienced Cirrhosis Classes of New Therapies Liver International pages 93-14, 3 JAN 13 DOI: 1.1111/liv.176 http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/1.1111/liv.176/full#liv176-fig-2 2

DAAs in Late-Stage Clinical Development for Chronic HCV Infection NS3/4A Protease Inhibitors Nucleotide NS5B Polymerase Inhibitors Non-Nucleoside NS5B Polymerase Inhibitors NS5A Replication Complex Inhibitors Approved Boceprevir Telaprevir Simeprevir Sofosbuvir Phase 3 ABT-45* Asunaprevir* Faldaprevir ABT-333 BI 7127 Daclatasvir* ABT-267* GS-5885* Phase 2 Danoprevir GS-9256 GS-9451 MK-5172 Sovaprevir Filibuvir Mericitabine ABT-72 BMS-791325 Setrobuvir Tegobuvir VX-222 IDX719 MK8742 NEW INTERFERONS 3

PEGLAMBDA INTERFERON REDUCED SIDE EFFECTS Lambda Alpha Headache 27 42 Arthralgia 6 33 Myalgia 6 Fever 8 33 Insomnia 18 25 Chills 4 21 Rash 15 24 Itching 18 29 Irritability 16 13 AJ Muir et al Gastroenterol 13: (in press) PEGLAMBDA INTERFERON REDUCED SIDE EFFECTS AJ Muir et al Gastroenterol 13: (in press) 4

COMBINING NEW APPROVED THERAPIES FOR GENOTYPE 1 COSMOS: Genotype 1 Week 4 12 24 36 48 N=14 Arm 1 SMV + SOF + Post-treatment follow-up N=24 Arm 2 SMV + SOF Post-treatment follow-up N=14 Arm 3 SMV + SOF + Post-treatment follow-up N=27 Arm 4 SMV + SOF Post-treatment follow-up Enrolment ratio 2:1:2:1 Cohort 1: Prior null responders (METAVIR F-F2) Final SVR12 for all arms Cohort 2: Treatment-naïve and prior null responders (METAVIR F3-F4) Interim SVR4 for Arms 3 and 4 Jacobson et al AASLD 13 5

Patients (%) 24 week treatment 1/24 4.2 9 4/24 16.7 9 7 7 5 79 5 3 3 1 19/24 1 SMV/SOF SMV/SOF/ 24 wks 24 wks 12 week treatment 7.8 1/14 3.7 1/27 92 96 13/14 26/27 SMV/ SMV/SOF SOF SMV/ SMV/SOF/ SOF/ 12 wks 12 wks SVR12 (SMV/SOF) SVR12 (SMV/SOF/) Non-virologic failure Relapse Jacobson et al AASLD 13 12 week treatment Patients (%) 1/27 9 96.3 93.33 7 5 3 1 14/14 26/27 7/7 12/12 7/7 14/15 Total Naives Nulls 9 naïve and 9 null responders METAVIR F4 patients Only relapser was a F4 prior null responder 1/15 SVR4 (SMV/SOF) SVR4 (SMV/SOF/) Relapse Jacobson et al AASLD 13 6

NEW THERAPIES FOR GENOTYPE 1: IFN FREE SVR12 Rates (ITT) for 8- and 12-Week Arms Perce entage of patients (ITT) achieving SVR 12 N= N=41 N=79 N=79 N=79 N=45 N=45 8 weeks 12 weeks 12 weeks ABT-45 ABT-267 ABT-333 ABT-45 ABT-333 ABT-45 ABT-267 ABT-45 ABT-267 ABT-333 Treatment-naϊve Patients ABT-45 ABT-267 ABT-333 ABT-45 ABT-267 ABT-45 ABT-267 ABT-333 Null Responders Kowdley K, et al. 63rd AASLD; Boston, MA; November 9-13, 12. Abst. LB-1. 7

AVIATOR: SVR12 Rates With ABT-45/RTV, ABT-267, ABT-333, and No drug-related SAEs reported SV VR12 (%) 86 84 96 96 Treatment-Naive Patients 98 Observed data 88 88 82 96 96 (above bar) 79 85 83 ITT (within bar) n = 56 24 29 12 52 27 52 25 54 25 1a 1b 1a 1b 1a 1b 1a 1b 1a 1b ABT-45 ABT-267 ABT-333 ABT-45 ABT-333 ABT-45 ABT-267 8 wks 12 wks ABT-45 ABT-267 ABT-333 ABT-45 ABT-267 ABT-333 Kowdley KV, et al. AASLD 12. Abstract LB-1. Aviator: Null response results Kowdley KV, et al. AASLD 12. Abstract LB-1. 8

Sapphire 1 Trial: ABT-45/r, ABT-267, ABT-333, Naïve, Genotype 1a and 1b Non-cirrhotic 631 patients ABT 45/r, ABT-267 co-formulated into 1 pill ABT-333, dosed twice daily AE s fatigue, headache, nausea Enanta/ABBVIE Press release 11/18/13 Sapphire 1 Trial: SVR 12 96 95 98.6 d/c rate in all arms 1.7% relapse rate All n=473 G 1a n=322 G 1b n=151 Placebo n=218 Enanta/Abbvie Press Release 11/18/13 9

Direct-Acting Antiviral Agents Daclatasvir (DCV) NS5A replication complex inhibitor with potent, pan-genotypic activity in vitro Studied in over 55 patients Asunaprevir (ASV) NS3 protease inhibitor active against genotypes (GT) 1, 4, 5, and 6 in vitro Studied in over patients BMS-791325 Non-nucleoside, NS5B polymerase inhibitor active against GT 1, 3, 4, 5, and 6 in vitro Studied in over 5 patients Everson et al AASLD 13 Randomized, Phase 2b Open-Label Study (AI443-14) Primary endpoint: SVR 12 N = N = 86 DCV 3 mg BID + ASV mg BID + BMS-791325 75 mg BID DCV 3 mg BID + ASV mg BID + BMS-791325 15 mg BID 12-week follow-up Additional follow-up to SVR 48 Week 12 24 Patients: treatment-naive, stratified by GT 1a/1b and presence of biopsy- confirmed cirrhosis i (82% GT1a and 9% cirrhotics). Primary end point: HCV RNA < LLOQ 12 weeks post-treatment (SVR 12 ) Observed analysis: breakthrough, relapse, addition of pegifnα/ = failure Modified intent-to-treat analysis: missing, breakthrough, relapse or addition of pegifnα/ = failure Everson et al AASLD 13 1

Efficacy Through SVR 12 (Observed) 97.5 94.2 92.4 91.7 92.2 91.7 Res sponse, % of patients 78/ 81/86 73/79 77/84 71/77 77/84 DCV + ASV + 325 75 mg DCV + ASV + 325 15 mg End of Treatment SVR 4 SVR 12 Everson et al AASLD 13 Event, n (%) Safety Outcomes DCV + ASV + DCV + ASV + 325 75 mg 325 15 mg N = N = 86 Total N = 166 Serious AEs 1(13) (1.3) 2(23) (2.3) 3(16) (1.6) AEs leading to discontinuation 1 (1.3) 1 (1.2) 2 (1.1) Grade 3/4 AEs 1 (1.2) 1 (.5) Most frequent on-treatment AEs ( 1%) Headache 17 (21.3) 24 (27.9) 41 (24.7) Diarrhea 12 (15.) 13 (15.1) 25 (15.1) Fatigue 12 (15.) 7 (8.1) 19 (11.4) Nausea 1 (12.5) 7 (8.1) 17 (1.2) Grade 3/4 lab abnormalities Aspartate aminotransferase (AST) 1 (1.3) 1 (.5) Glucose, fasting serum (high) 1 (1.3) 1 (1.2) 2 (1.2) Phosphorus, inorganic 1 (1.2) 1 (.5) Bilirubin, total 1 (1.2) 1 (.5) Everson et al AASLD 13 11

NEW THERAPIES FOR GENOTYPE 1: COFORMULATED AGENTS Direct Acting Antiviral Agents Sofosbuvir/Ledipasvir FDC Once daily, oral fixed-dose (/9 mg) combination tablet No food effect > patients treated SOF Nucleotide Polymerase inhibitor LDV NS5A inhibitor GS-9669 HCV NS5B non-nucleoside inhibitor, binding at thumb site II of the polymerase Potent antiviral activity with QD dosing Nanomolar potency against GT 1a and 1b Gane et al AASLD 13 12

Study Design Wk Wk 6 Wk 12 F4 omized Rando SOF/LDV FDC (n=1) SOF/LDV FDC + (n=1) GT 1 Experienced F3/F4 Randomized SOF/LDV FDC + (n=25) SOF/LDV FDC + GS-9669 (n=25) SVR12 GT 1 Naïve F/F1/F2 SOF/LDV FDC + (n=25) Primary endpoint: SVR12 (HCV RNA <LLOQ) Patients enrolled in ELECTRON or ELECTRON 2 (GT1, F3/F4) All groups were open label Gane et al AASLD 13 SVR 12 (%) 9 7 5 3 1 7 7/1 9/9 25/25* 26/26* SOF/LDV SOF/LDV + SOF/LDV + SOF/LDV + GS9669 Duration (wk) 12 12 F4 only 12 12 F3/F4 *From ELECTRON 2 Gane et al AASLD 13 13

SVR 12 (%) 9 7 5 3 1 68 25/25 21/21 17/25 SOF + LDV + * SOF/LDV + SOF/LDV + Duration (wk) 12 8 6 *Gane et al. EASL 13. Lawitz et al AASLD 13 (LONESTAR) Conclusions In treatment-experienced patients with advanced fibrosis/cirrhosis, either or GS- 9669 may enhance the efficacy of SOF/LDV given for 12 weeks The optimal duration of SOF/LDV in treatmentnaïve GT 1 patients (even with the addition of ) is more than 6 weeks Regimens of SOF/LDV alone, or with or with GS-9669, were safe and well tolerated Gane et al AASLD 13 14

n=25 MK-5172 ( mg) + MK-8742 ( mg) + ; G1a & G1b Follow-up n=27 MK-5172 ( mg) + MK-8742 (5 mg) + ; G1a & G1b Follow-up n=13 MK-5172 ( mg) + MK-8742 (5 mg); G1b Follow-up D1 TW4 TW12 SVR4 SVR8 SVR12 SVR24 Lawitz et al AASLD 13 % HCV-RNA <25 IU/mL 9 7 5 3 1 96 96 96 93 93 89 89 25 25 13 25 27 13 24 25 25 27 13 13 24 24 13 25 27 13 24 24 25 27 TW4 TW12 SVR4 SVR12 13 13 MK-5172 ( mg) + MK- 8742 ( mg) + (n=25) MK-5172 ( mg) + MK- 8742 (5 mg) + (n=27) MK-5172 ( mg) + MK- 8742 (5 mg) (n=13) Lawitz et al AASLD 13 Treatment Follow-up 15

Number of patients (%) MK-5172 Common MK-5172 MK-5172 mg mg Adverse mg + MK-8742 +MK-8742 5 Event mg + MK-8742 5 All arms mg mg + N=65 + n=25 n=28 n=12 Fatigue 8 (32) 5 (18) 4 (33) 17 (26) Headache 4 (16) 5 (18) 5 (42) 14 (22) Nausea 3 (12) 7 (25) 2 (17) 12 (18) Diarrhea 3 (12) 4 (14) 1(8) 8 (12) Dizziness 4 (16) 2 (7) 1 (8) 7 (11) Rash 1 (4) 5 (18) 1 (8) 7 (11) * Incidence 1% in all arms Lawitz et al AASLD 13 Study Design and Methods Treatment Period PostTreatment Period Cohort 1 (n=12) mg BID DBV + 1 mg QD FDV* + mg QD 668 + Cohort 2 (n=12) mg BID DBV + 1 mg QD FDV* + mg QD 668 + Cohort 3 (n=12) mg BID DBV + 1 mg QD FDV* + mg QD 668 (no ) Day Week 12 Week 16 SVR4 Week 24 SVR12 Week 36 SVR24 *FDV loading dose (2 mg) on Day 1 Lalezari et al AASLD 13 16

<LLOQ/<LLOD (%) 1 Cohort Cohort Cohort 3 (- All Time 1 n 2 n free) n Cohorts n Week 2 92/42 12 92/67 12 67/17 12 83/42 36 Week 4 92/75 12 / 12 /67 12 97/81 36 Week 6 / 11 2 /92 12 / 1 /97 33 Week 8 / 11 2 / 11 / 4 / 26 Week 12 / 9 2 / 8 N/A 3 / 17 SVR4 / 7 2 / 6 N/A 3 / 13 Overall, 97% of patients across all three cohorts achieved HCV RNA <LLOQ (81% <LLOD) at week 4, regardless of use NEW THERAPIES FOR GENOTYPE 1: IFN AND FREE 17

N BL HCV Genotype/Regimen Treatment Experience Week 12 Week 24 Substudy 1: Patients Without Cirrhosis Substudy 2: Patients With Compensated Cirrhosis Group 1 GT4 ABT-45/r + ABT-267 Treatment-naïve Group 2 GT1b ABT-45/r + ABT-267 Treatment-naïve Group 3 GT1b ABT-45/r + ABT-267 Group 4 Null Responders Group 5 GT4 ABT-45/r + ABT-267 + rbv Treatment-naïve Group 6 GT4 ABT-45/r + ABT-267 Partial/Null Responders & Relapsers Group 7 GT4 ABT-45/r + ABT-267 + rbv Group 8 Partial/Null Responders & Relapsers GT1b ABT-45/r + ABT-267 Treatment-naïve GT1b ABT-45/r + ABT-267 Partial/Null Responders & Relapsers ABT-45/r 15/ mg QD; ABT-267 25 mg QD; weight based, mg or 1 mg daily divided BID. Patients followed through 48 weeks post-treatment Lawitz et al AASLD 13 ercentage of Patients P 9 7 5 3 1 97.6 97.6 95.2 42/42 41/42 41/42 /42 Week 4 Week 12 SVR SVR EOTR 4 12 Lawitz et al AASLD 13 18

ercentage of Patients P 9 7 5 3 1 Lawitz et al AASLD 13 97.5 97.5 92.5 9 39/ 39/ 37/ 36/ Week 4 Week 12 SVR SVR EOTR 4 12 Event, n (%) GT1b-infected Treatment-naïve Patients (N=42) GT1b-infected Prior Null Responders (N=) Headache 14 (3.3) 1 (25.) Nausea 8 (19.) Dry Skin 7 (16.7) Fatigue 6 (14.3) Pruritus 6 (14.3) Diarrhea 6 (14.3) Lawitz et al 13 19

HCV RNA < LLOQ, n (%) Ineligible naïve/intolerant (IN/I) Patients n = 135 a Nonresponder (NR) Patients n = 87 b Total N = 222 RVR, Week 4 114 (84.4) 53 (.9) 167 (75.2) cevr, Week 12 125 (92.6) 77 (88.5) 2 (91.) SVR 4 126 (93.3) 71 (81.6) 197 (88.7) SVR 12 1 (88.9) 7 (.5) 19 (85.6) SVR 24 118 (87.4) 7 (.5) 188 (84.7) a Ineligible naïve: n=; Intolerant: n=35 b Null responders: n=48; Partial responders: n=36; Undetermined: n=3 Abstract #211 Chayama et al AASLD 13 TREATMENT OF PI EXPERIENCED: IFN FREE THERAPIES

Once Daily Sofosbuvir/Ledipasvir Fixed Dose Combination with or without Ribavirin with HCV Genotype 1, Including Patients with Cirrhosis: the LONESTAR trial Wk Wk 8 Wk 12 Wk Wk 24 COHORT 1 (n=) Treatment Naïve (No cirrhosis) 1:1:1 Randomized SOF/LDV SOF/LDV + SOF/LDV SVR12 SVR12 SVR12 COHORT 2 (n=) PI Failures (5% cirrhosis) Randomized 1:1 SOF/LDV SOF/LDV + SVR12 SVR12 Single center study of GT 1 patients Broad inclusion criteria No upper limit to age or BMI Platelets 5,/mm 3 Lawitz et al AASLD 13 Results: Demographics of Patients Who Previously Failed PI Therapy PI Failures n= Prior treatment with boceprevir 22/ (55) Prior treatment with telaprevir 18/ (45) Cirrhosis, n (%) 22/ (55) Mean platelet count, x 1 3 /µl 17 Mean albumin, g/dl 3.8 All patients were required to have experienced virologic failure Patients who stopped prior therapy due to an AE were excluded Lawitz et al AASLD 13 21

Lonestar Results 95 95 95 Patients (%) Duration (week) 19/ 21/21 18/19 18/19 21/21 + + 8 8 12 12 12 Lawitz et al AASLD 13 Treatment Naïve (No Cirrhosis) PI Failures (5% Cirrhosis) Daclatasvir + Sofosbuvir ± in GT 1 Pts With Prior Tx Failure on TVR or BOC Pts with GT 1 HCV and virologic failure on previous TVR- or BOC-based regimen (N = 41) Daclatasvir mg QD + Sofosbuvir mg QD (n = 21) Daclatasvir mg QD + Sofosbuvir mg QD + -1 mg/day (n = ) Wk 24 SVR4, % SVR12, % 95 45% to 48% had TVR/BOC resistance mutations, median 2.4 yrs since previous therapy No difference in response by absence/presence of resistance mutations Both regimens well tolerated; 1 serious AE; no discontinuations due to AEs Sulkowski MS, et al. EASL 13. Abstract 1417. 22

Evolution of Therapy in HCV Genotype 1 199 1 13 15 1999? SVR (%) 25 2 1 15 IFN IFN IFN/ IFN/ 6m 12m 6m 12m PEG/ 12m PEG/R/PI 6-12m All Oral DAA 12-24 weeks 23