IMMUNOSUPPRESSIVE THERAPY Overview. Desensitization

Similar documents
Overview of New Approaches to Immunosuppression in Renal Transplantation

Immunosuppressants. Assistant Prof. Dr. Najlaa Saadi PhD Pharmacology Faculty of Pharmacy University of Philadelphia

Fellows Conference 01/21/2016

OBJECTIVES. Phases of Transplantation and Immunosuppression

Aljoša Kandus Renal Transplant Center, Department of Nephrology, University Medical Center Ljubljana, Slovenia

Liver Transplant Immunosuppression

Post-Transplant Monitoring for the Development of Anti-Donor HLA Antibodies

9/30/ DISCLOSURES. + First: Why immunosuppress? Transplant Immunosuppression and Prophylaxis

Controversies in Renal Transplantation. The Controversial Questions. Patrick M. Klem, PharmD, BCPS University of Colorado Hospital

Post Transplant Immunosuppression: Consideration for Primary Care. Sameh Abul-Ezz, M.D., Dr.P.H.

Medications in the Solid Organ Transplant Recipient

HLA and Non-HLA Antibodies in Transplantation and their Management

Immunopathology of T cell mediated rejection

Immunosuppressant medicines have allowed patients

Overview of Immunosuppression in Renal Transplantation

Management of Rejection

It s just not that into you:

Review of Rituximab and renal transplantation. Dr.E Nemati. Professor of Nephrology

Solid Organ Transplantation

Strategies for Desensitization

Objectives. The Immune Response. Mechanisms of T-Cell Activation. Balancing Act of Transplant 4/22/2015. Maintenance Immunosuppression

Literature Review: Transplantation July 2010-June 2011

Solid Organ Transplantation 1. Chapter 55. Solid Organ Transplant, Self-Assessment Questions

The legally binding text is the original French version TRANSPARENCY COMMITTEE OPINION. 30 November 2011

Renal Transplant. Tony Chacon. Program Head BCIT Nephrology Nursing Program.

Considering the early proactive switch from a CNI to an mtor-inhibitor (Case: Male, age 34) Josep M. Campistol

Kidney Transplant. November 4 th, 2016

Dr. Yi-chi M. Kong August 8, 2001 Benjamini. Ch. 19, Pgs Page 1 of 10 TRANSPLANTATION

BK virus infection in renal transplant recipients: single centre experience. Dr Wong Lok Yan Ivy

Better than Google- Click on Immunosuppression Renal Transplant. David Landsberg Oct

Tolerance Induction in Transplantation

Chronic Kidney Disease (CKD) Stages. CHRONIC KIDNEY DISEASE Treatment Options. Incident counts & adjusted rates, by primary diagnosis Figure 2.

Why so Sensitive? Desensitizing Protocols for Living Donor Kidney Transplantation

Renal Pathology- Transplantation. Eva Honsova Institute for Clinical and Experimental Medicine Prague, Czech Republic

Serum samples from recipients were obtained within 48 hours before transplantation. Pre-transplant

Kidney Transplantation: What Pharmacists & Technicians Need to Know

2/28/2017. Adult Heart Transplants Donor and Recipient Characteristics UNOS, Retransplant VCM. Other /2015 (N = 24,474)

What is the Best Induction Immunosuppression Regimen in Kidney Transplantation? Richard Borrows: Queen Elizabeth Hospital Birmingham

Transplantation in Australia and New Zealand

IMMUNOBIOLOGY OF TRANSPLANTATION. Wasim Dar

European Risk Management Plan. Measures impairment. Retreatment after Discontinuation

Cases: CMV, HCV, BKV and Kidney Transplantation. Simin Goral, MD University of Pennsylvania Medical Center

Intruduction PSI MODE OF ACTION AND PHARMACOKINETICS

Steroid Minimization: Great Idea or Silly Move?

American Journal of Transplantation 2009; 9 (Suppl 3): S1 S157 Wiley Periodicals Inc.

3/6/2017. Treatment of Detected Antibodies. I have financial relationship(s) with: Thoratec/St. Jude/Abbott Consultant CareDx Consultant/Speaker

Alemtuzumab-based induction treatment versus basiliximab based induction treatment in kidney transplantation (the 3C Study): a randomised trial

Why Do We Need New Immunosuppressive Agents

Why we need a new paradigm in immunosuppression USHERING A NEW ERA OF IMMUNOSUPPRESSION. Causes of death and graft loss after kidney transplantation

APHERESIS FOR DESENSITIZATION OF NON-RENAL TRANSPLANTS

Chapter 22: Hematological Complications

Efficacy and Safety of Thymoglobulin and Basiliximab in Kidney Transplant Patients at High Risk for Acute Rejection and Delayed Graft Function

Transfusion support in Transplantation

Mycophenolate Mofetil

Post Operative Management in Heart Transplant นพ พ ชร อ องจร ต ศ ลยศาสตร ห วใจและทรวงอก จ ฬาลงกรณ

Autoimmune Hepatitis. What Drug and for How Long? Hepatology Day May 30 th, 2015

This study is currently recruiting participants.

Liver Transplant: What s Different? Brian Lin, MD, FACEP Emergency Medicine, Kaiser Permanente, San Francisco UCSF Clinical Assistant Professor

Desensitization in Kidney Transplant. James Cooper, MD Assistant Professor, Kidney and Pancreas Transplant Program, Renal Division, UC Denver

What Every Non-hepatologist Should Know About Caring For Transplanted Patients. Gia Tyson, MD, MPH Ochsner Health System March 31, 2017

Image: Bruce Wetzel - Harry Schaefer, Wikimedia Commons

Immunosuppression for pediatric cardiac transplantation in the modern era

Victims of success: Do we still need clinical trials? Robert S. Gaston, MD CTI Clinical Trials and Consulting University of Alabama at Birmingham

Literature Review Transplantation

Innovation In Transplantation:

Supplementary appendix

Transplantation: Year in Review

Transplant Primer for ICU Pharmacists

NAPRTCS Annual Transplant Report

Transplantation in highly sensitised patients treated with intravenous immunoglobulin and Rituximab

By the way, I have a transplant..

Chronic Kidney Disease & Transplantation. Paediatrics : 2004 FRACP

FIT Board Review Corner March 2016

Case Report Beneficial Effect of Conversion to Belatacept in Kidney-Transplant Patients with a Low Glomerular-Filtration Rate

Divya Jain Arwindekar, DO Transplant Nephrologist Advocate Christ Medical Center & Associates in Nephrology

TRANSPLANT IMMUNOLOGY. Shiv Pillai Ragon Institute of MGH, MIT and Harvard

NAPRTCS Annual Transplant Report

Pulmonary AMR Therapeutic Options & Strategies: The Old and the New. Ramsey Hachem, MD March 28, 2017

Cover Page. The handle holds various files of this Leiden University dissertation.

SELECTED ABSTRACTS. All (n) % 3-year GS 88% 82% 86% 85% 88% 80% % 3-year DC-GS 95% 87% 94% 89% 96% 80%

Diagnosis and Management of Acute and Chronic Humoral Rejection. Lars Pape

- Transplantation: removing an organ from donor and gives it to a recipient. - Graft: transplanted organ.

Evaluation of a Weight-based Rabbit Anti-thymocyte Globulin Induction Dosing Regimen for Kidney Transplant Recipients

3/6/2017. Prevention of Complement Activation and Antibody Development: Results from the Duet Trial

Immunology. Anas Abu-Humaidan M.D. Ph.D. Transplant immunology+ Secondary immune deficiency

REACH Risk Evaluation to Achieve Cardiovascular Health

MEDICATIONS: THE GOOD, THE BAD, THE UGLY

Transplant Immunosuppression in 2017 Hepatobiliary Liver Transplant Symposium 2017

BK Virus (BKV) Management Guideline: July 2017

CAMPATH INDUCTION IN RENAL TRANSPLANTATION. by Kakit Edmond Chan. Thesis is submitted for the degree of MD [Res] of Imperial College London

ASSESSMENT OF THE PAEDIATRIC NEEDS IMMUNOLOGY DISCLAIMER

Belatacept: An Opportunity to Personalize Immunosuppression? Andrew Adams MD/PhD Emory Transplant Center

The common premise for immunosuppressive

Cardiff & Vale (C&V) UHB Corporate Medicines Management Group (c MMG) SHARED CARE. Drug: MYCOPHENOLATE MOFETIL/SODIUM Protocol number: CV 15

Potential Catalysts in Therapeutics

Transplant Overview. Timothy J. Schroeder President and CEO CTI Clinical Trial and Consulting Services November 10, 2005

Long term liver transplant management

Biopsy Features of Kidney Allograft Rejection Banff B. Ivanyi, MD Department of Pathology, University of Szeged, Szeged, Hungary

PanGraf Tacrolimus Capsules 0.5 / 1.0 / 5.0

Transcription:

IMMUNOSUPPRESSIVE THERAPY Overview Two types of immune responses to allografts: Cellular response: foreign antigen recognition activate antigen-specific lymphocytes (T-cells) o Key mediator: T-cells o T-cells require 3 signals: 1. Antigenic signal, 2. Co-stimulatory signal, 3. Cytokine IL-2 signal Humoral response: foreign antigen recognition antibody formation by immune system (B-cells) Mechanisms of immunosuppression Depletion of lymphocytes Diversion of lymphocyte traffic Blocking of lymphocyte response Stages of immunosuppression 1. Desensitization 2. Induction 3. Maintenance 4. [Rejection] Desensitization Overview Who What When Why Immunosuppressive therapy to lower 1 to 2 weeks recipient s level of antibodies against prior to the donor to allow for transplant transplant Recipients with antibodies against their living donor (HLA or ABO incompatible) Determining recipient s need for desensitization Measuring ABO incompatibility Improved outcomes compared to waiting for cadaveric donor; gives highly sensitized recipients a chance o Naturally occurring antibodies against donor s blood type antigen (e.g. type A, type B, type AB, type O) o Mix recipient serum with antibodies + donor s blood type antigen serial dilutions to find ABO titer o 1:4 titer is needed to proceed with transplant Measuring HLA incompatibility o Non-naturally occurring antibodies against HLA that the recipient has either due to pregnancy, blood transfusion, or a previous transplant o 3 methods of measuring antibodies to HLA PRA: panel reactive antibody Tests recipient vs. population (i.e. probability of incompatibility) PRA% = reactivity to new organ = risk of antibody-mediated rejection Crossmatch Tests recipient vs. donor Two methods to test: standard crossmatch & flow crossmatch o Standard crossmatch: cytotoxicity test damage signifies (+) crossmatch o Flow crossmatch: flow cytometer quantified antibody response but can t see which antibody it is reacting to (non-specific) If patient has positive crossmatch, they are HLA incompatible DSA: donor-specific antibody Tests recipient vs. donor Determines exactly which antibody it is reacting to, the most sophisticated test Method: beads with chemically attached HLA antigens + recipient serum + fluorescent-labeled anti-human IgG processed through Luminex Analyzer Desensitization strategies PRIBES Mechanism: removal or reduction of donor-specific antibodies

Plasmapharesis o Mechanical removal of antibodies from patient s blood o Method: remove blood from patient remove plasma (with antibodies) from blood and discard replace plasma with albumin or fresh frozen plasma IVIG (intravenous immunoglobulin) o Functions: replace essential antibodies removed with plasmapharesis, helps downregulate production of antibodies by inhibiting complement system o SE: infusion-related reactions, flushing, fever, chills, arthralgias, dyspnea Rituximab (Rituxin) o Chimeric mouse monoclonal antibody, depleting agent o MOA: binds to CD20 on B-cells apoptosis antibody production o Does not affect already existing antibodies or plasma cells o SE: hypotension, bronchospasm, mucocutaneous reactions May premedicate (APAP, Benadryl) or treat (hydrocortisone, epinephrine) Bortezomib (Velcade) o Proteasome inhibitor, depleting agent o MOA: ( )proteasome complex involved in protein processing (e.g. plasma cells) apoptosis of plasma cell o SE: peripheral neuropathy, neutropenia, thrombocytopenia Eculizumab (Soliris) o Humanized monoclonal antibody specific for complement system o MOA: ( )membrane attack complex formation interrupts terminal step of complement cascade o SE: headache, back pain, URI symptoms, nausea Splenectomy o The spleen concentrates B-cells around its blood vessels in order to fight infection o MOA: surgically remove spleen deplete antibodies and memory cells o For ABO incompatability o Important for patient to get vaccinated: pneumococcal, meningococcal, hemophilus influenza B Induction Overview Acute & potent immunosuppression in the peri-operative period generally for high risk patients to risk of rejection Purpose: suppress T-cells to encourage allograft acceptance + bridge to maintenance therapy Primarily for high risk patients: African Americans (stronger immune systems), re-transplants, & highly sensitized patients (HLA incompatibility due to pregnancy, blood transfusions, or re-transplants) Agents for induction STAB Steroids: methylprednisolone taper, oral prednisone o Corticosteroids, non-depleting agents o MOA: blocks cytokine gene expression anti-inflammatory effect + redistributes lymphocytes o High dose IV methylpred: 250mg 1000mg o Pharmacokinetics: t½ 2-3 hrs, duration of action 24 hrs o Short-term SE: impaired glucose tolerance, bp, appetite, impaired wound healing, mood disturbances o Long-term SE: osteoporosis, diabetes, acne, cataracts, infection, weight, hyperlipidemia, steroid-dependence o Always used in induction, even in steroid-free programs Thymoglobulin or Atgam o Polyclonal antibody, depleting agents o Derived IgG antibodies from rabbits (Thymoglobulin) or horses (Atgam) o MOA: polyspecific binding of antibodies to immunocompetent T-cells using surface antigens rapid lymphopenia o Thymoglobulin preferred over Atgam unless rabbit allergy: longer and T-cell depletion, affinity to T-cells o Thymoglobulin dose: 1.5 mg/kg IV for 3-7 days o SE: leukopenia, thrombocytopenia, anemia, lymphoproliferative disease o Need to try to response to foreign protein (e.g. cytokine release syndrome, serum sickness) Premedicate: APAP 325-1000mg, Benadryl 25-50mg, or methylprednisolone Prolong infusion rate (~ 6 hours) and/or infuse via central access o Monitor for efficacy (ALC<200, CD3<50) and toxicity (WBC<5, platelets<100) Basiliximab (IL-2 RA)

o Chimeric monoclonal antibody, non-depleting agent o MOA: antibody directed against CD25 on activated T-cell surface halts T-cell proliferation o Basiliximab dose: 20mg IVPB on day 0 and day 4 o SE: generally well tolerated Alemtuzumab o Humanized monoclonal antibody, depleting agent o MOA: antibody directed against CD52 (on T-cells, B-cells, monocytes, macrophages, NK cells) cell surface binding cellular-mediated lysis o Dose: 20mg IVPB or 0.3 mg/kg/day x 2 doses o Adverse effects Infusion reactions: fevers, chills, rash, N/V/D, dyspnea limit with APAP, Benadryl, or methylpred Hypotension limit with fluids ± vasopressors Hematologic effects: anemia, neutropenia, thrombocytopenia limit with erythropoietin, filgrastim, transfusion (in this order) Infections: opportunistic infections, sepsis Maintenance immunosuppression Drugs administered post-transplant for lifelong immunosuppression to prevent allograft rejection Calcineurin inhibitors Tacrolimus (Prograf) Cyclosporine (Neoral, Sandimmune) Calcineurin inhibitors Antimetabolites Cornerstone of immunosuppressive therapy MOA: blocks IL-2 signal production Toxicities: nephrotoxicity, neurotoxicity, electrolyte disturbances, DM, HTN o Nephrotoxicity: both acute & chronic Additive nephrotoxicity with NSAIDs, aminoglycosides, Steroids amphotericin B Nephroprotective effects: ACE-I, ARB, CCB (dihydropyridine) o Diabetes: tacrolimus >> cyclosporine Methylprednisolone Drug interactions: CYP3A4 metabolized o CYP3A4 inducers: phenytoin, carbamazepine, rifampin mtor inhibitors o CYP3A4 inhibitors: azoles, macrolides, CCB (non-dihydropyridines), antiretrovirals Sirolimus (Rapamune) o P-gp substrates: digoxin, statins, colchicine Everolimus (Zortress) Diarrhea P-gp expression CNI levels Cyclosporine o Two formulations: Belatacept (Nulojix) Sandimmune: O/W cyclosporine emulsion Neoral: microemulsion cyclosporine o MOA: binds to cyclophilin ( )calcineurin ( )IL-2 synthesis prevents T-cell proliferation o Dose: PO 3-5 mg/kg/dose q12hr, IV 50% of PO dose over 2-6hr continuous infusion Dose adjustments: based on troughs or 2hr level o SE: hirsutism, gingival hyperplasia, hyperuricemia, hyperlipidemia o Role in therapy: kids > 5 y/o, EBV naïve Tacrolimus (FK506) o MOA: binds to FKBP-12 ( )calcineurin ( )IL-2 synthesis prevents T-cell proliferation o Dose: PO 0.05-1 mg/kg/dose q12h, IV 50-100 mcg/kg/day as continuous infusion Dose adjustments: based on trough o SE: alopecia, tremors/falls Antimetabolites Azathioprine o Prodrug of 6-mercaptopurine o MOA: nucleoside analog that inhibits purine synthesis o Dose: PO 1-3 mg/kg/day, IV equivalent oral dose Dose adjustment: based on SE, levels not monitored Mychophenolate (Cellcept, Myfortic) Azathioprine (Imuran) Most common maintenance regimen: tacrolimus + MPA ± steroids

o Drug interactions: allopurinol blocks xanthine oxidase 6 mercaptopurine severe infection o SE: hematologic (leukopenia, anemia, thrombocytopenia), pancreatitis, hepatotoxicity, squamous skin cell cancer o Place in therapy: too many SE, no longer used much Mycophenolate o Prodrug of mycophenolic acid o MOA: ( ) IMPDH ( ) de novo synthesis of purines o Two formulations: Mycophenolate mofetil (Cellcept) Enteric-coated mycophenolate sodium (Myfortic) o MMF dose: PO 1000-1500mg bid, IV 1000mg bid over 2hr Dose adjustment: based on SE, too difficult to monitor levels o Metabolic pathway: enterohepatic recirculation stays in system longer Cyclosporine inhibits this recirculation, therefore combination with tacrolimus more effective o SE: GI upset (N/V/D, dyspepsia, ab pain; more than azathioprine), hematologic (less than azathioprine) EC formulation helps ameliorate upper GI effects, better tolerated o Role in therapy: preferred over azathioprine because acute rejection, graft survival, hematologic effects mtor inhibitors Agents: Sirolimus, Everolimus mtor = mammalian target of rapamycin mtori MOA: binds to FKBP-12 ( )mtor activity phosphorylation of proteins translation & protein synthesis proliferation of lymphocytes o Overall blocks IL-2 signal transduction Sirolimus dose: PO 2mg or 0.1mg/kg, no IV formulation o Dose adjustments: based on levels or toxicities Drug interactions: CYP3A4 metabolism & P-gp substrate (admin 4hrs after cyclosporine) SE: profound hematologic (anemia, thrombocytopenia), proteinuria, nephrotoxicity, hypertriglyceridemia, mouth ulcers, additive nephrotoxicity with calcineurin inhibitors, impaired wound healing, interstitial pneumonitis Place in therapy: third line, use if can t tolerate all others o Sirolimus: also used in cardiology: anti-vegf properties ( ) smooth muscle proliferation o May have benefits in malignancies Corticosteroids Agent: prednisone low dose (5-15mg qd) Many adverse effects 50% of US transplant centers use steroid free regimens o Short term: impaired glucose tolerance, bp, appetite, impaired wound healing, mood disturbances o Long term: osteoporosis, diabetes, acne, cataracts, infection, weight gain, hyperlipidemia, dependence Place in therapy: patients failing steroid-free regimen, very high risk sensitized patients with preformed antibodies, no induction (3 drug regimen) Belatacept Only one in its class: selective co-stimulation signal 2 blocker MOA: ( )APC s CD80/86 from binding to T-cell CD28 receptor ( )signal 2 ( )cytokine production (+)T-cell anergy & apoptosis ( )proliferation Administration: patient has to come into office for 30min IV infusion once a month SE: myelosuppression, post-transplant lymphoproliferative disorder (if EBV neg), GI upset, neuropathy, infusion-related SE Contraindication: patients EBV naïve (e.g. young children) PTLD Place in therapy: only used for kidney transplants in conjunction with mycophenolate and steroids Overview of maintenance therapy toxicities Calcineurin inhibitors Antimetabolites mtor inhibitors Steroids Nephrotoxicity, neurotoxicity, hypertension, diabetes, hyperlipidemia, electrolyte disorders, hirsutism/alopecia, GI toxicity GI toxicity, cytopenia Hyperlipidemia, anemia, edema, mouth ulcers Osteoporosis, diabetes, weight gain, body changes, glaucoma, wound healing

Immunosuppressive Pharmacology Optimization >> Why it matters Recipient survival: live donor > deceased donor Current problems: chronic rejection, nephrotoxicity from treatment, & death with functioning graft (due to CVD, malignancy, infections) CVD: CNI & steroids > mtori >>> mycophenolate & belatacept (n/a) Immunosuppressive therapy Choosing the right regimen >> Three questions to think about Patient s risk for rejection? o Induction vs. no induction 3 groups who should get induction 1. High risk for rejection o High risk: immunogenicity of organ transplanted, African Americans, highly sensitized patients with preformed antibodies o Should use depleting agents (e.g. Thymoglobulin) 2. Experimental protocols o Steroid-free protocols (e.g. UICMC) o Calcineurin avoidance protocols 3. High risk for ATN resulting in delayed graft function o ATN: acute tubular necrosis, due to ischemic damage o High risk: donor >50y/o, donor <12y/o, recipient >55y/o, cold ischemic time >24hr, donor SCr >1.8mg/dL, DCD donor (cardiac death) o Just an estimated risk evaluation performed with limited info available; not enough time to see what the kidney actually looks like o May warrant a delay in initiating calcineurin inhibitors o Depleting vs. non-depleting agent Which calcineurin inhibitor? o Cyclosporine vs. tacrolimus vs. none Potency: tacrolimus > cyclosporine DM risk: tacrolimus > cyclosporine Patient age: if <5 y/o, use cyclosporine (EBV naïve) Cyclosporine SE: hirsutism, gingival hyperplasia, hyperuricemia, hyperlipidemia Tacrolimus SE: alopecia, tremors, falls, diabetes o Delayed CNI initiation If high risk for ATN o CNI avoidance Benefits: long term renal damage, SE (DM, HTN, electrolyte abnormalities) Patients with ATN are at risk for delayed graft function May need induction to avoid additive CNI toxicity Disadvantages: delaying CNI may rejection risk, SE of other meds are not very favorable either Alternative options: basiliximab (induction) and belatacept (maintenance) using these as adjuncts or alternatives can help CNI toxicities Adjunct agent combination? o Mycophenolate vs. mtori Mycophenolate SE: GI problems, leukopenia, viral infections Sirolimus SE: impaired wound healing (don t use in fresh surgery patients), lipids, nephrotoxicity (especially in combination with CNI), proteinuria Liver vs. kidney: if liver transplant, mycophenolate may be preferable Hepatocellular cancer: sirolimus has antitumor properties o Steroid minimization or avoidance Both short term and long term SE affect outcome of transplanted graft Benefits: PTDM, weight gain, hyperlipidemia Risks: doses of tacrolimus/cyclosporine, potent induction, SE of other meds Not eligible for steroid-free program: on steroids before transplant, ABO-incompatible, positive crossmatch, re-transplant, recurrent/early rejection episodes

Current UIHHSS practice: kidney transplants Induction: low risk gets basiliximab and methylprednisolone, high risk gets thymoglobulin and methylpred o If induction with methylpred only, then patient will need lifelong steroid maintenance Maintenance: everyone gets tacrolimus except low risk non-dm Hispanics Rejection Classification of rejection based on time to rejection [minutes] Hyperacute [days to weeks] Acute [>3 months] Late acute [months to years] "Chronic" Pathophysiological classification Cellular rejection (T-cell) o Major players: APCs (macrophages, B-cells, etc.), antigens, MHC, T-cells o Mechanism: T-cells secrete cytokines inflammation apoptosis, interstitial fibrosis, and other graft damage o Upon biopsy: inflammation, tubulitis Antibody-mediated rejection o Major players: cytokines, chemokines, chemoattractants o Mechanism: complement activation antibodies target MHC antigen on endothelium of donor peritubular & glomerular capillaries inflammation rapid graft dysfunction o Upon biopsy: cell adhesion to endothelium, C4d staining, glomerulitis Histological classification Banff Criteria T-cell mediated rejection o Acute T-cell mediated rejection: order of severity [least severe] IA, IB, IIA, IIB, III [most severe] o Chronic T-cell mediated rejection: chronic allograft arteriopathy Antibody-mediated changes o C4d + circulating DSA + no evidence for rejection C4d = marker for complement system o Acute AMR: C4d + circulation DSA + acute tissue injury o Chronic AMR: C4d + circulating DSA + chronic tissue injury Additional classifications of rejection Based on response to treatment: steroid-resistant rejection Based on renal damage: acute rejection (biopsy proven + SCr) vs. subclinical rejection (biopsy proven w/o SCr) Risk factors for rejection: HLA incompatibility, ABO incompatibility, African American race, longer cold ischemia time Signs & symptoms of rejection: fever (>38 C), graft tenderness, oliguria (urine output <500 ml/day), hypertension, SCr (>25% ) Differential diagnosis Pre-renal Dehydration Hypotension Renal artery narrowing Renal Nephrotoxicity (e.g. drugs) Rejection Post-renal Obstruction Diagnostic criteria: biopsy is the gold standard, though lab values give a clue (e.g. SCr)

Treatment Treating acute cellular rejection o o Corticosteroids MOA: inflammation, neutrophil adherence, depletes APCs, T-cell proliferation, prostaglandins Role in therapy: 1 st line agent for ACR, though often inadequate alone when severe rejection or AMR Thymoglobulin MOA: depletes T-cells, ( ) co-stimulation of T-cells Role in therapy: 2 nd line due SE, used in combination with steroids when more severe rejection Treating antibody-mediated rejection: plasmapharesis, IVIG, corticosteroids (ineffective as monotherapy), rituximab, bortezomib, eculizumab Post-rejection management: stress medication adherence, optimize maintenance regimen, infection prophylaxis (Bactrim SS, valganciclovir)