NCCTG Status Report for Study N0275 May 2011

Similar documents
What are the hurdles to using cell of origin in classification to treat DLBCL?

Bendamustine, Bortezomib and Rituximab in Patients with Relapsed/Refractory Indolent and Mantle-Cell Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma

Addition of Rituximab to Fludarabine and Cyclophosphamide in Patients with CLL: A Randomized, Open-Label, Phase III Trial

New Evidence reports on presentations given at EHA/ICML Bendamustine in the Treatment of Lymphoproliferative Disorders

Bendamustine is Effective Therapy in Patients with Rituximab-Refractory, Indolent B-Cell Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma

Mathias J Rummel, MD, PhD

Rituximab in the Treatment of NHL:

Novel treatment options for Waldenstrom Macroglobulinemia

Lymphoma: What You Need to Know. Richard van der Jagt MD, FRCPC

Brad S Kahl, MD. Tracks 1-21

CAR-T cell therapy pros and cons

Update: New Treatment Modalities

The 2010 Gastrointestinal Cancers Symposium Oral Abstract Session: Cancers of the Pancreas, Small Bowel and Hepatobilliary Tract

Update: Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia

Strategies for the Treatment of Elderly DLBCL Patients, New Combination Therapy in NHL, and Maintenance Rituximab Therapy in FL

Blood Cancers. Blood Cells. Blood Cancers: Progress and Promise. Bone Marrow and Blood. Lymph Nodes and Spleen

Immune Therapy in Clear Cell Ovarian Cancer (ITICC) Hal Hirte Canadian Cancer Clinical Trials Group

NCCTG Status Report for Study N September 2007

The case against maintenance rituximab in Follicular lymphoma. Jonathan W. Friedberg M.D., M.M.Sc.

Managing patients with relapsed follicular lymphoma. Case

Instructions for Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia Post-HSCT Data (Form 2113)

Radiotherapy in DLCL is often worthwhile. Dr. Joachim Yahalom Memorial Sloan-Kettering, New York

Mantle Cell Lymphoma

Nuove opportunità di cura. Stefano Sacchi, Modena

Gazyva (obinutuzumab)

Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma (DLBCL)

eastern cooperative oncology group Michael Williams, Fangxin Hong, Brad Kahl, Randy Gascoyne, Lynne Wagner, John Krauss, Sandra Horning

CLL & SLL: Current Management & Treatment. Dr. Isabelle Bence-Bruckler

Large cell immunoblastic Diffuse histiocytic (DHL) Lymphoblastic lymphoma Diffuse lymphoblastic Small non cleaved cell Burkitt s Non- Burkitt s

New Targets and Treatments for Follicular Lymphoma

National Horizon Scanning Centre. Temsirolimus (Torisel) for mantle cell lymphoma - relapsed and/or refractory. January 2008

Neuro-Oncology Program

12 th Annual Hematology & Breast Cancer Update Update in Lymphoma

Lymphoma John P. Leonard, M.D.

CPAG Summary Report for Clinical Panel Policy 1630 Bendamustine-based chemotherapy for first-line treatment of Mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) in adults

The Clinical Research E-News

NON HODGKINS LYMPHOMA: INDOLENT Updated June 2015 by Dr. Manna (PGY-5 Medical Oncology Resident, University of Calgary)

Patterns of Care in Medical Oncology. Follicular Lymphoma

Policy for Central Nervous System [CNS] Prophylaxis in Lymphoid Malignancies

Background. Approved by FDA and EMEA for CLL and allows for treatment without chemotherapy in all lines of therapy

NHS England. Evidence review: Bendamustine with Rituximab for relapsed low-grade Non- Hodgkin s Lymphoma

Standard of care for patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma who are not eligible for a transplant

Update on Management of CLL. Presenter Disclosure Information. Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia. Audience Response Question?

Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia Update. Learning Objectives

RADIOIMMUNOTHERAPY FOR TREATMENT OF NON- HODGKIN S LYMPHOMA

Mantle cell lymphoma An update on management

Highlights in chronic lymphocytic leukemia

LYMPHOMA Joginder Singh, MD Medical Oncologist, Mercy Cancer Center

Update: Non-Hodgkin s Lymphoma

Angioimmunoblastic T-cell lymphoma: nobody knows what to do...

Have we moved beyond EPOCH for B-cell non-hodgkin lymphoma? YES!

The legally binding text is the original French version TRANSPARENCY COMMITTEE OPINION. 18 July 2012

Lymphocyte Predominant Hodgkin s Lymphoma. Case Presentation. How would you treat the patient?

Clinical Policy: Idelalisib (Zydelig) Reference Number: ERX.SPA.269 Effective Date:

CLL: disease specific biology and current treatment. Dr. Nathalie Johnson

Clinical Commissioning Policy Proposition: Bendamustine with rituximab for relapsed indolent non-hodgkin s lymphoma (all ages)

Improving Response to Treatment in CLL with the Addition of Rituximab and Alemtuzumab to Chemoimmunotherapy

Immune checkpoint inhibitors in Hodgkin and non-hodgkin Lymphoma: How do they work? Where will we use them? Stephen M. Ansell, MD, PhD Mayo Clinic

SEQUENCING FOLLICULAR LYMPHOMA

NON HODGKINS LYMPHOMA: AGGRESSIVE Updated June 2015 by Dr. Manna (PGY-5 Medical Oncology Resident, University of Calgary)

Non-Hodgkin lymphomas (NHLs) Hodgkin lymphoma )HL)

Clinical Commissioning Policy: Bendamustine with rituximab for relapsed and refractory mantle cell lymphoma (all ages)

Dr. A. Van Hoof Hematology A.Z. St.Jan, Brugge. ASH 2012 Atlanta

Bcl-2 inhibition in NHL. Jonathan W. Friedberg M.D., M.M.Sc.

Treatment Nodal Marginal Zone Lymphoma

Who should get what for upfront therapy for MCL? Kami Maddocks, MD The James Cancer Hospital The Ohio State University

Idelalisib in the Treatment of Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia

R/R DLBCL Treatment Landscape

CARE at ASH 2014 Lymphoma. Dr. Diego Villa Medical Oncologist British Columbia Cancer Agency Vancouver Cancer Centre

ASH up-date: Changing the Standard of Care for Patients with. (or: Who to treat with What When?)

State of the art: CAR-T cell therapy in lymphoma

TRANSPARENCY COMMITTEE OPINION. 14 February 2007

CLL Biology and Initial Management. Gordon D. Ginder, MD Director, Massey Cancer Center Lipman Chair in Oncology

Georg Hopfinger 3. Med.Abt and LBI for Leukemiaresearch and Haematology Hanusch Krankenhaus,Vienna, Austria

BR is an established treatment regimen for CLL in the front-line and R/R settings

Contemporary Chemotherapy-Based Strategies for First-Line Metastatic Breast Cancer

Rituxan Hycela. Rituxan Hycela (rituximab and hyaluronidase human) Description

Targeted Radioimmunotherapy for Lymphoma

Is autologous stem cell transplant the best consolidation after initial therapy?

New Therapies for MPNs

DYNAMO: A PHASE 2 STUDY OF DUVELISIB IN PATIENTS WITH REFRACTORY INDOLENT NON HODGKIN LYMPHOMA

ANCO: ASCO Highlights 2018 Hematologic Malignancies

Systemic Treatment. Third International Neuro-Oncology Course. 23 May 2014

Updates in the Treatment of Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma: ASH Topics

Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma Front line Therapy John P. Leonard, MD Weill Cornell Medicine New York, New York USA

TRANSPARENCY COMMITTEE OPINION. 27 January 2010

Notification to Implement Issued by pcodr: December 14, 2012

Clinical Commissioning Policy: Bendamustine with rituximab for relapsed and refractory mantle cell lymphoma (all ages) NHS England Reference: P

ESMO DOUBLE-HIT LYMPHOMAS

Contemporary Management of Glioblastoma

Scottish Medicines Consortium

Combined Modality Therapy State of the Art. Everett E. Vokes The University of Chicago

*Jagiellonian University, Kraków, Poland

Targeting CD20 and CD22 in B-cell ALL Daniel J. DeAngelo, MD, PhD

pan-canadian Oncology Drug Review Final Clinical Guidance Report Bendamustine (Treanda) for Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma November 29, 2012

RITUXAN (rituximab and hyaluronidase human)

The case for maintenance rituximab in FL

GLSG/OSHO Study Group. Supported by Deutsche Krebshilfe

Lymphoma 101. Nathalie Johnson, MDPhD. Division of Hematology Jewish General Hospital Associate Professor of Medicine, McGill University

Clinical Overview: MRD in CLL. Dr. Matthias Ritgen UKSH, Medizinische Klinik II, Campus Kiel

Transcription:

NCCTG Status Report for Study N0275 May 2011 Phase II Trial Evaluating Resection Followed by Adjuvant Radiation Therapy (RT) for Patients with Desmoplastic Melanoma Primary Goals 1. Assess the recurrence rates in patients with Desmoplastic Melanoma (DM) >1mm deep treated with adjuvant radiotherapy after surgical resection. 2. Assess recurrence rates in patients with locally recurrent DM treated with adjuvant radiotherapy after surgical resection. Secondary Goals 1. Evaluate the impact of adjuvant radiation therapy after surgical resection on disease free and overall survival. 2. Evaluate the immediate and long-term morbidity of the addition of radiotherapy to surgery. Design Schema: Study Chair: Statistician: Projected Number of Patients: Registration Radiation therapy Barbara A. Pockaj, M.D. Richard L. Deming, M.D. Jake Allred, M.S. 60 Treating Schedule: Dose Days FX/Size #FX RT Length 30 Gy Twice a week (Monday and Thursday or Tuesday and Friday) 6 Gy 5 2.5 Weeks Study Design: Study Status/ Accrual: Forty patients with DM >1mm deep will be accrued and treated with adjuvant radiotherapy after surgical resection. Similarly, 20 patients with locally recurrent DM will be accrued at treated with adjuvant radiotherapy after surgical resection. Data will be used to calculate 95% confidence intervals for the true 2 year local recurrence rate in each group. This study was opened on 07/11/2003 and was closed on 07/31/2009 with a final accrual of 20 patients.

Adverse Events: There is adverse event data available on all 20 patients. There has been one patient with grade 5 cardiovascular that was not related to study treatment. There has been 3 grade 3 adverse events; pruritis, prothrombin time and hyponatremia (all of which were deemed not related to study treatment). See Table 1. Table 1: Adverse Event Summary Protocol N0275 - Resection RT Melanoma Adverse Events(Regardless of Attribution) Arm A Evaluable Patients: 20 N % Patients with at least one: Arm Grade 3+ Adverse Event A 4 20.0 Grade 4+ Adverse Event A 1 5.0 Grade 3+ Non-Hem Adverse Event A 4 20.0 Grade 4+ Non-Hem Adverse Event A 1 5.0 Protocol N0275 - Resection RT Melanoma Adverse Events For All Patients(Regardless of Attribution) Arm A Evaluable Patients: 20 Grade Adverse Event 1 2 3 4 5 N % N % N % N % N % Type Arm DERMATITIS-RT A 15 75.0 3 15.0 PAIN-RT A 4 20.0 1 5.0 ALOPECIA A 3 15.0 1 5.0 ANOREXIA A 3 15.0 DYSPHAGIA A 2 10.0 CARDIOVASCULAR A 1 5.0 FATIGUE A 1 5.0 HYPONATREMIA A 1 5.0 PROTHROMBIN TIME A 1 5.0 PRURITIS A 1 5.0

NCCTG Status Report for Study N0675 May 2011 Phase II Study of Temozolomide and Everolimus (RAD001) Therapy for Metastatic Melanoma Primary To estimate the 9-week progression free survival rate for patients diagnosed with stage IV malignant melanoma treated with a regimen of everolimus and temozolomide. Secondary Evaluate overall survival (OS) time. Evaluate time to disease progression. To assess the toxicity profile of the combination of everolimus and temozolomide when used to treat patients with stage IV malignant melanoma. To assess clinical benefit rates (i.e., stable disease, partial remission and complete response rates). Translational Describe the impact of therapy on parameters of angiogenesis and immunity (systemic and tumor microenvironment). Study Status/ Accrual: This study was opened on 01/18/2008 and was closed on 10/03/2008 with a final accrual of 49 patients. There was 1 patient deemed ineligible. The final complete Status Report was produced Spring, 2010. References: Abstract: Dronca R, Perez DG, Allred JB, Maples WJ, Creagan ET, Pockaj BA, Kaur JS, Kuebler JP, Marchello BT, Markovic SN: NCCTG Phase II Study of Temzolomide and Everolimus (RAD001) Therapy for Metastatic Melanoma. J Clin Oncol 28:15s:(suppl; abstr 8572), 2010. (N0675) Background: A recently described escape mechanism of melanoma cells exposed to alkylating agents is the production of the pro-survival cytokine vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF). We hypothesized that the combination of TMZ and RAD001 could provide an additive therapeutic benefit in metastatic melanoma and impact the antitumor immune response due to the effect of both agents on immune cell function. Methods: We conducted a single arm phase II trial of the combination of RAD001 (10 mg/day for 5 of 7 days) and TMZ (200 mg/m 2 days 1-5 every 28 days) in patients with stage IV unresectable MM. Patients (pts) began therapy with RAD001 1 week before initiation of TMZ (cycle 1 = 5 weeks, other cycles = 4 weeks). Pts previously treated with systemic therapy (excluding study agents) were eligible. Major exclusion criteria were active brain metastases, abnormal liver/renal function,

and poor performance status (PS > 2). The primary end point was 9 week progression free survival (PFS9) rate. With a sample size of 39, the one-stage study design had a significance level of 0.10 and 90% power to test the hypothesis that the true PFS9 rate is at most 35% vs the alternative of at least 55%. Regimen is considered promising if > 17 patients were PFS9 successes. Secondary end points included therapy associated changes of biomarkers of angiogenesis and immunity. Results: The study accrued 49 pts (1 ineligible) from 01/08-10/08 (median age: 60 years [range 28-84]). The most common metastatic sites were lungs (43%) followed by lymph nodes (28%) and liver (20%), with 27% of patients having prior chemotherapy. Of the first 39 evaluable pts, 17 (44%, 95% CI: 28-60%) were PFS9 successes. Overall 4 of 48 (8%) pts achieved a partial response, the median PFS was 2.4 months (95% CI: 2.1-4.0), and the median OS was 8.6 mos (95% CI: 7.1-12.2). Treatment was well tolerated, only 1 pt discontinued therapy due to toxicity (hyperlipidemia). Results of correlative laboratory studies are forthcoming. Conclusions: The combination of TMZ and RAD001 did not appear to offer a therapeutic advantage over TMZ-alone historic controls. Pending biomarker analysis may offer insights into potential combinations of the current regimen with other treatments in advanced melanoma.

NCCTG Status Report for Study N0775 May 2011 A Randomized Phase II Trial of Temozolomide (TMZ) and Avastin or ABI-007/Carboplatin (CBDCA) and Avastin in Patients with Unresectable Stage IV Malignant Melanoma Primary To assess the anti-tumor activity in terms of the percentage patients who are progression free at 6 months and safety profile of each treatment regimen. Secondary 1. To estimate the response rate in each of the treatment regimens. 2. To estimate the distribution of PFS times and OS time of each treatment regimen. Translational To examine the impact of therapy on angiogenesis and immune homeostasis. Study Status/ Accrual: References: This study was opened on 09/19/2008 and was closed on 01/12/2010 with a final accrual of 86 patients. The final complete Status Report was produced Spring 2010. Manuscript in progress.

NCCTG Status Report for Study N1085 May 2011 A Phase I/II Study of Everolimus (RAD001) plus R-CHOP for New Untreated Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma (DLBCL) Primary Phase I: To establish the maximum tolerated dose of RAD001 in combination with R-CHOP chemotherapy. Phase II: To assess the feasibility of RAD001 (everolimus) in combination with standard R-CHOP chemotherapy (rituximab, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone) in patients with newly diagnosed diffuse large B- cell lymphoma. Secondary Phase I: To describe the toxicities associated with RAD001 in combination with R-CHOP chemotherapy. Phase II: 1. To further describe the toxicities associated with RAD001 in combination with R-CHOP chemotherapy. 2. To assess the rate of event-free survival at 12 months for diffuse large B-cell lymphoma patients treated with RAD001 in combination with R- CHOP chemotherapy. 3. To evaluate overall response rate, complete response rate, duration of response, event-free survival, overall survival, and progression-free survival for patients treated with RAD001 in combination with R-CHOP chemotherapy. Correlative studies 1. To profile gene expression using immunohistochemistry and categorize patients as germinal-center B-cell-like (GBC) vs. activated B-cell-like (ABC) vs. unclassified lymphoma subtype. 2. To determine whether previously identified predictive markers in large cell lymphoma remain valid with the addition of everolimus to R-CHOP chemotherapy. Design Schema: Registration Everolimus + RCHOP

NCCTG Status Report for Study N1087 May 2011 Phase I/II Study of the Combination of Bendamustine, Rituximab and MK-2206 in the Treatment of Relapsed Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia and Small Lymphocytic Lymphoma Design Schema: 1. Phase I: To assess the safety and maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of MK-2206 in combination therapy with bendamustine-rituximab in relapsed CLL or SLL patients. 2. Phase II: To assess the rate of complete response (CR) of MK-2206 in combination with bendamustine-rituximab in relapsed CLL or SLL patients 3. To assess clinical efficacy of MK-2206 in combination with bendamustine-rituximab as demonstrated by analysis of overall response rate (CR, CRi, CCR, npr and PR), duration of response, and treatment free survival. 4. To assess the toxicity profile of MK-2206 in combination with bendamustine-rituximab. 5. Evaluation of whether the established CLL prognostic factors (CD38, CD49d, IGHV, FISH and ZAP-70) predict responses to the combination therapy of MK2206, with bendamustine-rituximab. 6. Minimal residual disease will be evaluated after treatment in patients who achieve a clinical response. MRD status will be explored in relation to both the quality and duration of response. 7. Evaluation of the effects of the addition of MK-2206 to bendamustinerituximab on B cell receptor initiated, PI3K/Akt downstream signal pathways, apoptosis analysis and leukemic cell activation status, as well as multiple cytokine profiles and key gene expression analysis with focus on leukemic cells. 8. Evaluation of MSC-CLL biology including the effects of the addition of MK-2206 to bendamustine-rituximab on CLL marrow stromal cell (MSC) proliferation, migration and cytokine production, as well as the adhesion capacity between MSC and leukemic cells. Registration MK2206+Bendamustine+Rituximab Observation Event Monitoring

NCCTG Status Report for Study N1088 May 2011 A Pilot/Feasibility Phase I Study of Bendamustine, Rituximab and Lenalidomide in Patients with Refractory/Relapsed Indolent NHL Primary: To establish the maximum tolerated dose of lenalidomide in combination with BR chemotherapy. Secondary 1. To evaluate the toxicity profile of lenalidomide in combination with BR chemotherapy. 2. To assess progression free survival. 3. To assess the overall and complete response rates of lenalidomide in combination with bendamustine and rituximab in patients with relapsed/refractory indolent NHL. Correlative studies 1. Explore serum cytokine profile changes prior to and after treatment. 2. As part of ongoing research for NCCTG Hematology studies, we are banking paraffin-embedded tissue blocks/slides and blood products for future studies. Design Schema: Registration Rituximab + Bendamustine + Lenalidomide

NCCTG Status Report for Study N1089 May 2011 Effect of Vitamin D Replacement on Tumor Response and Survival Parameters for Vitamin D Insufficient Patients with Lymphoid Malignancies Primary 1. To test whether vitamin D replacement in vitamin D insufficient patients with early stage CLL being managed with observation can produce tumor responses and prolong TTT. 2. To learn if vitamin D replacement in vitamin D insufficient patients with newly diagnosed untreated aggressive NHL can improve the EFS and OS to be equivalent to that of a control population of vitamin D sufficient patients Correlative studies 1. To study vitamin D metabolism gene polymorphisms, immune effector cells (lymphocytes, monocytes), serum cytokines, and tumor cells from vitamin D insufficient and sufficient patients entered on these trials to learn the effects of vitamin D on both tumor cells and the patient's immune system. Design Schema: Registration Assess serum 25(OH)D at on-study If < 25 ng/ml, then replace with vitamin D3 50,000 IU weekly If 25 ng/ml, then observe

NCCTG Status Report for Study 978151 May 2011 A Phase II Study of Alternating Cycles of Fludarabine and Cyclophosphamide in Previously Untreated Patients with B-Cell CLL Study Status/ Accrual: 1. To assess the rate and duration of complete and partial remission with the study treatment schedule. 2. To monitor and assess toxicity of this alternating regimen. 3. Utilize molecular genetic studies and flow cytometry on peripheral blood cells from patients receiving CR by conventional criteria. 4. To apply FISH techniques using probes to chromosomes 12 and 13 as prognostic factors for time-to-progression and overall survival. This study was opened on 08/13/1999 and was closed on 10/09/2000 with a final accrual of 34 patients. The final complete Status Report was produced Spring, 2003. References: Manuscript in progress.

NCCTG Status Report for Study N9982 May 2011 A Pilot Study of Thalidomide as an Inhibitor of Angiogenesis in the Treatment of Myelofibrosis with Myeloid Metaplasia (MMM) 1. To investigate whether thalidomide is an effective therapeutic agent in patients with MMM. 2. To assess the effects of thalidomide on the myelofibrotic stroma with respect to microvascular architecture and angiogenesis, collagen and reticulin deposition, and the expression of the mediating growth factors bfgf, TGF-b, and PDGF, and their respective receptors. Study Status/ Accrual: References: This study was opened on 05/05/2000 and was closed on 04/18/2003 with a final accrual of 35 patients. The final complete Status Report was produced Fall, 2004. Elliott, M. A., Mesa, R. A., Li, C.-Y., Hook, C. C., Ansell, S. M., Levitt, R. M., Geyer, S. M. and Tefferi, A. (2002), Thalidomide treatment in myelofibrosis with myeloid metaplasia. British Journal of Haematology, 117: 288 296. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2141.2002.03443.x Elliott MA, Geyer SM, Camoriano JK, Kahanic SP, Alexander SJ, Medgyesy DC, Li CY, Tefferi A., A Low Dose Thalidomide (Td) Treament in myelofibrosis with Myeloid Metaplasia (MMM): An NCCTG Study [Abstract]. American Society of Hematology. Vol. 11, no. 102: Blood. (2003): 923a.