Investigating the Frequency of Atherosclerosis Risk Factors in Patients Suffering from X Syndrome

Similar documents
Maria Angela S. Cruz-Anacleto, MD

BIOAUTOMATION, 2009, 13 (4), 89-96

Management of Stable Ischemic Heart Disease. Vinay Madan MD February 10, 2018

Pathophysiology of Coronary Microvascular Dysfunction

Evidence-Based Management of CAD: Last Decade Trials and Updated Guidelines

Microvascular disease Prevalence and Management

Screening for Asymptomatic Coronary Artery Disease: When, How, and Why?

Cardiovascular disease, studies at the cellular and molecular level. Linda Lowe Krentz Bioscience in the 21 st Century September 23, 2009

Relationship between body mass index, coronary disease extension and clinical outcomes in patients with acute coronary syndrome

Exercise Test: Practice and Interpretation. Jidong Sung Division of Cardiology Samsung Medical Center Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine

Ambulatory Care Conference

A CASE REPORT AND LITERATURE REVIEW ON MYOCARDIAL INFARCTION WITH NORMAL CORONARY ARTERIES

Management of stable CAD FFR guided therapy: the new gold standard

Clinical Features and Subtypes of Ischemic Stroke Associated with Peripheral Arterial Disease

Control of Myocardial Blood Flow

Patients with cardiac syndrome

ADVANCED CARDIOVASCULAR IMAGING. Medical Knowledge. Goals and Objectives PF EF MF LF Aspirational

Cardiovascular System and Health. Chapter 15

Cardiovascular disease, studies at the cellular and molecular level. Linda Lowe Krentz Bioscience in the 21 st Century October 4, 2010

63 yo woman with chest pain

Imaging ischemic heart disease: role of SPECT and PET. Focus on Patients with Known CAD

Ischaemic heart disease. IInd Chair and Clinic of Cardiology

Cho et al., 2009 Journal of Cardiology (2009), 54:

Myocardial Stress Perfusion Imaging using CMR

Heart disease remains the leading cause of morbidity and mortality in industrialized nations. It accounts for nearly 40% of all deaths in the United

HEART CONDITIONS IN SPORT

JUPITER NEJM Poll. Panel Discussion: Literature that Should Have an Impact on our Practice: The JUPITER Study

Ischemic heart disease

Autonomic nervous system, inflammation and preclinical carotid atherosclerosis in depressed subjects with coronary risk factors

21st Annual Contemporary Therapeutic Issues in Cardiovascular Disease

Diagnosis of CAD S Richard Underwood

Quality Payment Program: Cardiology Specialty Measure Set

Results of Ischemic Heart Disease

P F = R. Disorder of the Breast. Approach to the Patient with Chest Pain. Typical Characteristics of Angina Pectoris. Myocardial Ischemia

Stable Angina: Indication for revascularization and best medical therapy

Qualitative and Quantitative Assessment of Perfusion

Angina Pectoris Dr. Shariq Syed

Angina Pectoris. Edward JN Ishac, Ph.D. Smith Building, Room

CURRENT STATUS OF STRESS TESTING JOHN HAMATY D.O.

A COMPARISON OF CORONARY ANGIOGRAPHY RESULTS IN PATIENTS WITH STABLE AND UNSTABLE ANGINA PECTORIS

Welcome! To submit questions during the presentation: or Text:

Metabolic Syndrome Is A Key Determinant Of Coronary Microvascular Function In Patients With Stable Coronary Disease Undergoing PCI

Microvascular Disease: How to Diagnose and What s its Treatment

Cardiac Stress MRI: Detection of Ischemia. Disclosures: Dobutamine Stress MR. April 28, 2018

Cardiovascular Disorders Lecture 3 Coronar Artery Diseases

Who Cares About the Past?

Spotty Calcification as a Marker of Accelerated Progression of Coronary Atherosclerosis : Insights from Serial Intravascular Ultrasound

FFR-CT Not Ready for Primetime

Stress ECG is still Viable in Suleiman M Kharabsheh, MD, FACC Consultant Invasive Cardiologist KFHI KFSHRC-Riyadh

Hypertension and Heart Disease. Weldon James, MD, Mercy Clinic Family Medicine, Union

Heart Attacks. Compiled by- RPS YADAV, SSE/RE/Allahabad

Appropriateness of Stress Echocardiography and Nuclear Stress Thallium/Sesta Mibi Testing Methods

Coronary Artery Disease

2/17/2010. Grace Lin, MD Assistant Professor of Medicine University of California, San Francisco

C-Reactive Protein and Your Heart

MPS and Calcium Score in asymptomatic patient F. Mut, J. Vitola

Know Your Number Aggregate Report Single Analysis Compared to National Averages

PET myocard perfusion & viability Riemer Slart

Use of Nuclear Cardiology in Myocardial Viability Assessment and Introduction to PET and PET/CT for Advanced Users

Technical Meeting on: Current Role of Nuclear Cardiology in the Management of Cardiac Diseases Vienna, May 2008 Vienna International Centre

Non-Invasive Evaluation of Coronary Vasospasm Using a Combined Hyperventilation and Cold-Pressure-Test Perfusion CMR Protocol

ATTENDING PHYSICIAN'S STATEMENT CORONARY ARTERY BY-PASS SURGERY or OTHER SERIOUS CORONARY ARTERY DISEASE

Women and Coronary Artery Disease:

New Insight about FFR and IVUS MLA

Cardiovascular disease physiology. Linda Lowe-Krentz Bioscience in the 21 st Century November 2, 2016

Kavitha Yaddanapudi Stony brook University New York

Title for Paragraph Format Slide

Journal of the American College of Cardiology Vol. 50, No. 11, by the American College of Cardiology Foundation ISSN /07/$32.

Pearls & Pitfalls in nuclear cardiology

Cardiovascular Disease

CHRONIC CAD DIAGNOSIS

WHI Form Report of Cardiovascular Outcome Ver (For items 1-11, each question specifies mark one or mark all that apply.

Listing Form: Heart or Cardiovascular Impairments. Medical Provider:

Impact of Body Mass Index and Metabolic Syndrome on the Characteristics of Coronary Plaques Using Computed Tomography Angiography

Unit 1: Human Systems. The Circulatory System

Current and Future Imaging Trends in Risk Stratification for CAD

Fractional Flow Reserve from Coronary CT Angiography (and some neat CT images)

Ischemic Heart Disease

Term-End Examination December, 2009 MCC-006 : CARDIOVASCULAR EPIDEMIOLOGY

Coronary heart disease

Epidemiologic and clinical comparison of renal artery stenosis in black patients and white patients

Ischemic Heart Disease

Statistical Fact Sheet Populations

Case Report Left Main Stenosis. Percutaneous Coronary Intervention (PCI) or Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery (CABG)?

Cardiovascular Health Practice Guideline Outpatient Management of Coronary Artery Disease 2003

Understanding Cholesterol and Triglycerides

How to investigate (Cardiac) Chest Pain

Structure and organization of blood vessels

Women and Heart Disease

Coronary Artery Spasm

Diabetes and Occult Coronary Artery Disease

!!! Aggregate Report Fasting Biometric Screening CLIENT!XXXX. May 2, ,000 participants

Invited Experts' Case Presentation and 5-Slides Focus Review

Pharmacology. Drugs affecting the Cardiovascular system (Antianginal Drugs)

The ESC Registry on Chronic Ischemic Coronary Disease

Stable Angina Treatment Strategies and Current Practices in Lahore, Pakistan: A Cross-Sectional Analysis

SUPPLEMENTAL MATERIAL

Introduction. Risk factors of PVD 5/8/2017

FFR in Multivessel Disease

Transcription:

Available online at www.ijmrhs.com ISSN No: 2319-5886 International Journal of Medical Research & Health Sciences, 2016, 5, 10:84-90 Investigating the Frequency of Atherosclerosis Risk Factors in Patients Suffering from X Syndrome Adel Johari Moghadam and Reza Arefizadeh* Department of Cardiology, AJA University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran *Corresponding E-mail: arefizadehreza@yahoo.com ABSTRACT X syndrome is a cardiovascular disease during which the patient suffers from chest cage pains. Their fitness test might be unnatural and the angiography of most of them is normal or close to normal. As the researches indicate, there is currently no certain method to treat this disease. The treatments which are usually applied now use nitrogen compounds to loosen and widen vessels. As the researches indicate, controlling the risk factors of Atherosclerosis can partially recover the symptoms of this disease. In this research, as many as 160 files of patients suffering from X syndrome was obtained from 502 Hospital of the Army. Factors such as Hyperlipidemia, diabetes, high blood pressure, obesity, smoking cigarettes, long stress and family history of cardiovascular disease were studied and the frequency and frequency percentage of each variable compared to the whole population was measured and assessed. Having analyzed each variable, it became clear that obesity with a frequency of 98 people (61.3%) had the highest impact factor and preference in this disease. Following obesity, other factors such as high blood pressure, smoking cigarettes, diabetes and Hyperlipidemia have the highest influence and preference for intervention. Thus, controlling the above said factors, especially obesity and weight can help us significantly control this disease and its effects. Keywords: X syndrome, Atherosclerosis Factors, Heart Disease, Vascular Disease, Obesity. INTRODUCTION Heart X syndrome is a disease during which one suffers from chest cage pains and resorts to doctor about it. The fitness test of them can be unnatural and angiography of these patients is usually normal or close to normal [1]. As the researches indicate, distal coronary arteries involvement might contribute to the occurrence of this disease, so it is called microvascular angina, too [2-4]. The chest cage pain in these patients is usually more severe and longer that what is observed among those patients suffering from stable angina. This disease might even disrupt their daily activities [1, 4]. There is currently no definite and effective treatment for this disease and the treatments currently used for this purpose are based upon controlling the symptoms through nitrate compounds such as nitrocantin as vasodilator of blood veins in order to improve coronary artery perfusion to Myocardium, calcium channel blocker as the factor that reduces the spasm of smooth muscles in wall arteries, increases perfusion, reduces heart after-load and beta blockers. No appropriate response to improve the disease is usually observed [4-6]. As researches indicate, controlling atherosclerosis risk factors can play a major role in controlling the symptoms of this disease. The therapeutic effect of each one requires an accurate differentiation and measurement of the necessary intensity to control each risk factor, but the effectiveness has not been determined and described distinctively [1]. 84

References have also pointed to the effective influence of controlling risk factors of atherosclerosis in treating this disease, but the distinctive effect of controlling risk factors on patients symptoms and the main risk factor for control or for intensive control is not clear yet. The present research seeks to identify factors with greater frequency than normal population and pave the way for future studies about the influence of controlling each risk factor in controlling the symptoms of these patients [7]. In this research, 142 patients whose fitness tests were positive and their angiography was reported to be natural were studied in terms of heart risk factors and the results showed the the following shares for each factor: 45.7% for blood pressure, 33.8% for Dyslipidemia, 19.7% for obesity, 18.3% for positive family history of coronary veins disease, and 16.1% for smoking cigarette [1]. Studies also show that 95% of the patients suffering from X syndrome who had undergone heart MRI by injection of Adenosine were suffering from heart pains and sub-endocardial ischemia. This is the ischemic source of heart pain in patients suffering from X syndrome [2]. In another research, as many as 18 patients suffering from X syndrome and 10 natural and healthy people were put under test stress with Dobutamine. They were simultaneously under ischemic examination through heart MRI. As for those suffering from X syndrome, perfusion disorder was observed in them during stress test [3]. In this research, the influence of hyperlipidemia, diabetes, blood pressure, obesity, smoking cigarette, long stress and family history of cardiovascular diseases factors were analyzed in the patients suffering from X syndrome. MATERIALS AND METHODS Statistical society and sampling method In this study, the researchers went to the heart unit of 502 Hospital of the Army and extracted 4000 files of angiographic patients. 160 files corresponding to those suffering from X syndrome were randomly selected and the information concerning each variable was extracted from each patient s file and registered in the form prepared for the patient. Table 1: Type of variables, the role of each one, scientific definition and measurement unit Name of variable Independent Role of variable dependent Confounding background Type of variable/scale of variable Quantitative Qualitative distance relationship nominal ranking Scientific- practical definition Measurement unit Age * The calendar age of the patient base on birthday Years Gender * * Patient s gender based on his anatomy of genetics Male female Sweet diabetes * * A breakfast blood sugar more than 126 mg/dl mg/dl Hyperlipidemia * * Having a total cholesterol level more than 240 mg/di2 or triglyceride level above 200 mg/dl or an LDL level above 160 mg/dl mg/dl Having a Systolic blood pressure above 140 mm Hg High blood * * (constantly) or a Diastolic blood pressure above 90 pressure mm Hg (constantly) mmhg Obesity * * Having a BMI above 25 Kg/m2 Smoking cigarette * * Smoking cigarettes constantly or intermittently Yes no Long stress * * Is the individual older than 50? Yes no Positive family Do the first degree relatives have cardiovascular * * record disease? Yes no Patients with positive fitness test, positive heart scan or positive echo stress were included in our research and patients with obstruction in two or three coronary veins were excluded and those patients whose angiography results were normal or close to normal were included in the research. 85

Variables and the method of studying them Variables such as age, gender, sweet diabetes, hyperlipidemia, high blood pressure, obesity, smoking cigarettes, long-term stress and positive family history were studied in this research. They were then categorized in terms of the type of variable, role of variable, scientific definition and unit of measurement. Table 1 shows the type of variables, the role of each one, scientific definition and measurement unit of each one. RESULTS Gender and age As many as 160 patients were studied in this research from whom 88 were male (51.9%) and 77 were female (48.1%). The average age of the patients studied in this research was 56.87±11.338 with the oldest and youngest ages being 78 and 21 years old respectively. Descriptive results Positive fitness test, positive heart scan and positive echo stress test were set as inclusion criteria. Of all these participants, 28 (17.5%) had a positive fitness test, 29 had a positive echo stress (18.1%) and 103 (64.4%) with positive heart scan took part in our study. Table 2 represents the frequency and number of people who took part in in our research in terms of positive fitness test, positive heart scan and positive echo test. Table 2: Distribution of participants based on positive fitness test, positive heart scan and positive echo stress Frequency Percent Percent Cumulative Percent EST positive 28 17.5 17.5 17.5 sress ECHO pos 29 18.1 18.1 35.6 MPI pos 103 64.4 64.4 100.0 Total 160 100.0 100.0 The final inclusion criteria was defined as having normal angiography, mild CAD and minimal CAD. 49 people had normal angiography (30.6%), 27 had minimal CAD angiography (16.9%) and 84 had mild CAD angiography (52.2%) and remained in our study. Table 3 describes the frequency and distribution of each angiography mode to include people in the study. Table 3: The number of people and frequency of those with normal angiography, mild CAD, and minimal CAD who remained in our study Frequency Percent Percent Cumulative Percent NL angiography 49 30.6 30.6 30.6 MIN CAD 27 16.9 16.9 47.5 mild CAD 84 52.5 52.5 100.0 Total 160 100.0 100.0 The total number of diabetic people among those patients suffering from X syndrome was 28 and their frequency percentage ratio to the whole population was 17.5%. 20 of these people were female (26%) and 8 were male (9.6%). In this research, 62 people were suffering from Hyperlipidemia which made up 38.8% of all participants. This number was composed of 35 female (45.5%) and 27 male (32.5%) participants. The number of people suffering from obesity was 98 with a frequency percentage of 61.3%. Of this number, 50 were female (64.9%) and 48 were male (57.8%). Chart 1 presents the frequency percentage between fat and healthy people in terms of their gender and tables 4 and 5 display the number of healthy and fat people among women and men respectively. 86

Figure 1: Frequency percentage between fat and healthy people in terms of gender Table 4: Number and frequency percentage of fat and healthy cases among women Frequency Percent Percent Cumulative Percent negative 27 35.1 35.1 35.1 positive 50 64.9 64.9 100.0 Total 77 100.0 100.0 Table 5: Number and frequency percentage of fat and healthy cases among men Frequency Percent Percent Cumulative Percent negative 35 42.2 42.2 42.2 positive 48 57.8 57.8 100.0 Total 83 100.0 100.0 Frequency of long term stress among patients was 124 (77.5%) whose frequency among men and women was respectively 58 (69.9%) and 66 (85.7%) people. 36 of the patients studied smoked cigarette (22.5%). The frequency of this factor among men and women was 29 (34.9%) and 7 (9.1%) respectively. Tables 6 and 7 show the number of healthy cases and those with long stress for men and women respectively. Table 6: Number and frequency percentage of healthy cases and cigarette smokers in women Frequency Percent Percent Cumulative Percent negative 70 90.9 90.9 90.9 positive 7 9.1 9.1 100.0 Total 77 100.0 100.0 Table 7: Number and frequency percentage of healthy cases and cigarette smokers in men Frequency Percent Percent Cumulative Percent negative 54 65.1 65.1 65.1 positive 29 34.9 34.9 100.0 Total 83 100.0 100.0 Frequency of positive family history of cardiovascular diseases among patients was 82 (51.3%) whose frequency among men and women was respectively 41 (49.4%) and 41 (49.4%) people. Frequency of high blood pressure among patients was 70 (43.8%) whose frequency among men and women was respectively 25 (30.1%) and 45 (58.4%) people. Tables 8 and 9 show the number of healthy cases and those with high blood pressure among men and women respectively. 87

Table 8: Number and frequency percentage of healthy cases and those with high blood pressure among women Frequency Percent Percent Cumulative Percent negative 32 41.6 41.6 41.6 positive 45 58.4 58.4 100.0 Total 77 100.0 100.0 Table 9: Number and frequency percentage of healthy cases and those with high blood pressure among men Frequency Percent Percent Cumulative Percent negative 58 69.9 69.9 69.9 positive 25 30.1 30.1 100.0 Total 83 100.0 100.0 Figure 2: Average systolic blood pressure among the patients studied As for the systolic and diastolic blood pressure in patients, the average systolic blood pressure of Heart X syndrome is a cardiovascular disease and the person suffering from it has pain in his chest cage and their fitness test might be unnatural. Angiography of these patients is normal or close to normal. Figure 3: average diastolic blood pressure of patients 88

DISCUSSION According to the results of various researches conducted, controlling Atherosclerosis factors can play a major role in controlling this disease. In a research conducted by Kaski et al (1995), it turned out that the plasma levels of endothelin in patients suffering from X syndrome is significantly higher. This fact points to the failure of endothelium in these patients. We may also arrive at the conclusion that any pain in chest cage can be caused by high levels of endothelin in blood plasma [8]. In the researches conducted by Lanza et al (1997), it turned out that a high percentage of X syndrome patients show disruption in performance of Adrenergic nerves [9]. In another study conducted by Likelten et al (1995), 176 patients suffering from X syndrome were followed and monitored for 5 to 15 years. Their death toll caused by cardiovascular incidents was natural and similar to normal population. The risk of cardiovascular incidents among those patients with more risk factors had increased [7]. In another research conducted by Pit et al (1997), it was demonstrated that 17 patients suffering from X syndrome underwent angiography after 9 years and 15 cases showed no signs of obstruction. This fact was indicative of good survival and no rise of Atherosclerosis risk in these patients compared to normal population [10]. In this research, 160 of the patients resorting to the heart unit of 502 Hospital of the Army were studied in terms of age, gender, sweet diabetes, Hyperlipidemia, high blood pressure, obesity, smoking cigarette, long stresses and positive family history and their correlation with X syndrome disease. Considering the results achieved in this research, it was shown that obesity had the highest influence and preference to conduct therapeutic interventional studies on Atherosclerosis risk factors and the trend of improvement in patients suffering from X syndrome. Following it, factors such as high blood pressure, smoking cigarette, diabetes and Hyperlipidemia had the greatest preference for intervention. Based on the results achieved in this research, exercising can be recommended as one of the main factors to control Atherosclerosis factors and prevent obesity [11]. REFERENCES [1]Upasani P and Wasir H. Profile of coronary risk factors in patients with manifest ischaemia and normal coronary arteries. Indian heart journal. 1993;46(6):315-318. [2] Panting JR. Abnormal subendocardial perfusion in cardiac syndrome X detected by cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging. New England Journal of Medicine. 2002;346(25): 1948-1953. [3] Lanza GA. Relation between stress-induced myocardial perfusion defects on cardiovascular magnetic resonance and coronary microvascular dysfunction in patients with cardiac syndrome X. Journal of the American College of Cardiology. 2008;51(4):466-472. [4] Cannon RO. Airway hyperresponsiveness in patients with microvascular angina. Evidence for a diffuse disorder of smooth muscle responsiveness. Circulation. 1990;82(6): 2011-2017. [5] Egashira K. Effects of L-arginine supplementation on endothelium-dependent coronary vasodilation in patients with angina pectoris and normal coronary arteriograms. Circulation. 1996;94(2):130-134. [6] Bugiardini R. Comparison of verapamil versus propranolol therapy in syndrome X. The American journal of cardiology. 1989;63(5):286-290. [7] Lichtlen PR, Bargheer K, and Wenzlaff P. Long-term prognosis of patients with anginalike chest pain and normal coronary angiographic findings. Journal of the American College of Cardiology. 1995;25(5):1013-1018. [8] Kaski JC. Concentration of circulating plasma endothelin in patients with angina and normal coronary angiograms. British heart journal. 1995;74(6):620-624. [9] Lanza GA. Abnormal cardiac adrenergic nerve function in patients with syndrome X detected by [123I] metaiodobenzylguanidine myocardial scintigraphy. Circulatio.1997;(3)6:821-826. [10] Pitts WR. Repeat coronary angiography in patients with chest pain and previously normal coronary angiogram. The American journal of cardiology. 1997;80(8):1086-1087. 89

[11] Eriksson BE. Physical training in Syndrome X: physical training counteracts deconditioning and pain in Syndrome X. Journal of the American College of Cardiology. 2000:36(5):1619-1625 90