Πνευμονική Υπέρταση: Μια ΚΡΙΤΙΚΗ ματιά στις κλινικές μελέτες - AMBITION. Αναστασία Ανθη

Similar documents
Φαρµακοθεραπεία στη Πνευµονική Αρτηριακή Υπέρταση: Αρχική ή διαδοχική συνδυαστική θεραπεία

Therapeutic approaches in P(A)H and the new ESC Guidelines

Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension RELATED TO CONNECTIVE TISSUE DISORDER The strategy of INITIAL COMBINATION THERAPY

Effective Strategies and Clinical Updates in Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension

Progress in PAH. Gerald Simonneau

SATELLITE SYMPOSIUM OF MSD. sgc Stimulation for the treatment of PH. Real life management of PAH: case presentation

The Case of Marco Nazzareno Galiè, M.D.

STARTS-1 and -2. Barst R, Ivy DD, et al. Circulation 2012;125:

The Case of Lucia Nazzareno Galiè, M.D.

Comparison between adult and pediatric populations with I/HPAH and PAH-CHD in the Bologna ARCA registry

Contreversies in the management of PH What is controversial in treatment?

PFIZER INC. THERAPEUTIC AREA AND FDA APPROVED INDICATIONS: See United States Package Insert (USPI)

THERAPEUTICS IN PULMONARY ARTERIAL HYPERTENSION Evidences & Guidelines

*Division of Pulmonary, Sleep, and Critical Care Medicine, Rhode Island Hospital, Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, RI, USA

MACITENTAN DEVELOPMENT IN CHILDREN WITH PULMONARY HYPERTENSION (PAH)

Real-world experience with riociguat in CTEPH

Pulmonary arterial hypertension. Pulmonary arterial hypertension: newer therapies. Definition of PH 12/18/16. WHO Group classification of PH

Role of Combination PAH Therapies

Disclosures. Inhaled Therapy in Pediatric Pulmonary Hypertension. Inhaled Prostacyclin: Rationale. Outline

The US REVEAL Registry

ACCP PAH Medical Therapy Guidelines: 2007 Update. David Badesch, MD University of Colorado School of Medicine Denver, CO

Scottish Medicines Consortium

Chronic Thromboembolic Pulmonary Hypertention CTEPH

Therapy Update: ERAs. Review of Mechanism. Disclosure Statements. Outline. Disclosure: Research support from United Therapeutics

Tadalafil for the Treatment of Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension

Clinical Commissioning Policy: Selexipag for treating pulmonary arterial hypertension (all ages)

Θεραπεία με βάση τη βαρύτητα ή εξαρχής επιθετική συνδυαστική θεραπεία. Φραντζέσκα Φραντζεσκάκη Πνευμονολόγος-Εντατικολόγος ΠΓΝ «ΑΤΤΙΚΟΝ»

Protocol. This trial protocol has been provided by the authors to give readers additional information about their work.

Case Presentation : Pulmonary Hypertension: Diagnosis and Imaging

Prognostic value of echocardiographic parameters in patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) treated with targeted therapies

Update in Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension

Medical Management of CTEPH: What is its role?

Pulmonary Hypertension: When to Initiate Advanced Therapy. Jonathan D. Rich, MD Associate Professor of Medicine Northwestern University

22nd Annual Heart Failure 2018 an Update on Therapy. Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension: Contemporary Approach to Treatment

Oral Therapies for Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension

Clinical Commissioning Policy: Selexipag in the treatment of Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension

Treatment of Paediatric Pulmonary Hypertension

Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension - Overview

Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension - Overview

Approach to Pulmonary Hypertension in the Hospital

Combination therapy in the treatment of pulmonary arterial hypertension 2015 update

Clinical Science Working Group 6: Diagnosis & Assessment of PAH. Co-chairs: David B. Badesch, MD Marius M. Hoeper, MD. Working Group 6 Members

Pulmonary Hypertension. Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension Diagnosis, Impact and Outcomes

Updates in Pulmonary Hypertension Pharmacotherapy. Ziad Sadik PharmD BCPS

IV PGI2 vs. Inhaled PGI2 in chronic lung disease

J. Gerry Coghlan 1 Richard Channick. Nazzareno Galiè 5 Hossein-Ardeschir Ghofrani. Irene M. Lang 10 Vallerie McLaughlin

Real life management of CTEPH: patient case

Clinical Commissioning Policy Proposition: Selexipag in the treatment of Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension

CONUNDRUMS IN PULMONARY ARTERIAL HYPERTENSION

Πνευμονική υπέρταση: Τα 10 πιο σημαντικά κενά και παραλείψεις των Κατευθυντήριων Οδηγιών του 2015

La terapia dell ipertensione arteriosa polmonare oggi

Latest Results from Clinical Trials (MAESTRO)

Galie N, Benza R, Rubin LJ, Hoeper MM, Jansa P, Kusic-Pajic A, Simonneau G

DECLARATION OF CONFLICT OF INTEREST

Class Update with New Drug Evaluation: Drugs for Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension

Managing Multiple Oral Medications

VOLIBRIS PRODUCT INFORMATION

Pulmonary Hypertension in 2012

Final Appraisal Report: GlaxoSmithKline. Advice No: 2508 April Recommendation of AWMSG

NATIONAL INSTITUTE FOR HEALTH AND CLINICAL EXCELLENCE. Health Technology Appraisal. Drugs for the treatment of pulmonary arterial hypertension

Where are we now in the longterm. of PAH and CTEPH? Hits and misses of medical treatment. Hap Farber Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, USA

PULMONARY HYPERTENSION RESPIRATORY & CRITICAL CARE CONFERENCE APRIL 21, 2016 LAURA G. HOOPER

GSK Medicine: Study Number: Title: Rationale: Phase: Study Period: Study Design: Centres: Indication: Treatment: Objectives:

Pulmonary Hypertension: We have come a Long Way

Selexipag: an oral, selective prostacyclin receptor agonist for the treatment of pulmonary arterial hypertension

ΔΙΑΓΝΩΣΗ ΚΑΙ ΘΕΡΑΠΕΙΑ ΤΗΣ ΧΡΟΝΙΑΣ ΘΡΟΜΒΟΕΜΒΟΛΙΚΗΣ ΥΠΕΡΤΑΣΗΣ (CTEPH)

National Horizon Scanning Centre. Tadalafil for pulmonary arterial hypertension. October 2007

Functional Class Improvement and 3-Year Survival Outcomes in Patients With Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension in the REVEAL Registry

Pulmonary Hypertension Associated with Congenital Heart Disease. Amiram Nir Hadassah, Jerusalem

Pulmonary Hypertension: Follow-up in adolescence and adults

4/14/2010. Pulmonary Hypertension: An Update. Tim Williamson, MD, FCCP. University of Kansas Hospital. Normal Physiology

Beyond a single pathway: combination therapy in pulmonary arterial hypertension

Clinical Trial Synopsis TL-OPI-518, NCT#

Dr.Fayez EL Shaer Consultant cardiologist Assistant professor of cardiology KKUH

Multicenter Study of MagLev Technology in Patients Undergoing Mechanical Circulatory Support Therapy with HeartMate 3 (MOMENTUM 3) Long Term Outcomes

Risk populations moving to screening programs

Anjali Vaidya, MD, FACC, FASE, FACP Associate Director, Pulmonary Hypertension, Right Heart Failure, Pulmonary Thromboendarterectomy Program Advanced

1. Phosphodiesterase Type 5 Enzyme Inhibitors: Sildenafil (Revatio), Tadalafil (Adcirca)

Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension (PAH): Emerging Therapeutic Strategies

Pulmonary Hypertension: Definition and Unmet Needs

Advances in Pharmacotherapy of PAH

INSPIRE: A Phase 3 Open-Label, Multicenter Study to Evaluate the Safety and Tolerability of LIQ861 in Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension (PAH)

ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA FOR PULMONARY ARTERIAL HYPERTENSION THERAPY

Clinical Trial Synopsis TL-OPI-516, NCT#

Clinical Study Synopsis

Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension: The Approach to Management in 2019

6 min Walking Test: η σημασία του στην κλινική πράξη Καρακώστας Γεώργιος

Corporate Update January 2018

This clinical study synopsis is provided in line with Boehringer Ingelheim s Policy on Transparency and Publication of Clinical Study Data.

CDEC FINAL RECOMMENDATION

Pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) is

Riociguat for the treatment of pulmonary arterial hypertension: a long-term extension study (PATENT-2)

Navigating the identification, diagnosis and management of pulmonary hypertension using the updated ESC/ERS guidelines

Updates on Pulmonary Hypertension Treatment

Risk Stratification in Pulmonary Hypertension and Pregnancy

National Horizon Scanning Centre. Oral and inhaled treprostinil for pulmonary arterial hypertension: NYHA class III. April 2008

COMMITTEE FOR MEDICINAL PRODUCTS FOR HUMAN USE (CHMP) DRAFT

Epoprostenol and pulmonary arterial hypertension: 20 years of clinical experience

Raymond L. Benza, MD, a Mardi Gomberg-Maitland, MD, MSc, b Robert Naeije, MD, PhD, c Carl P. Arneson, MStat, d and Irene M.

Pulmonary Hypertension: Another Use for Viagra

Transcription:

Πανελλήνια Σεμινάρια Ομάδων Εργασίας 2017 k Πνευμονική Υπέρταση: Μια ΚΡΙΤΙΚΗ ματιά στις κλινικές μελέτες - AMBITION Αναστασία Ανθη Β Κλιν. Εντατικής Θεραπείας & Διακλινικό Ιατρείο Πνευμ. Υπέρτασης Π.Γ.Ν. «ΑΤΤΙΚΟΝ»

Disclosures Sponsored to attend scientific meetings, or honoraria by: Actelion Bayer MSD Galenica GSK Pfizer

Ambition study August 27, 2015

JACC, June 2009 PAH Evidence-Based Algorithm

JACC, June 2009 PAH Evidence-Based Algorithm

AMBITION A Randomised, Multicenter Study of First-Line Ambrisentan and Tadalafil Combination Therapy in Subjects with Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension

AMBITION A Randomised, Multicenter Study of First-Line Ambrisentan and Tadalafil Combination Therapy in Subjects with Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension The study was aimed to answer the question: starting PAH treatment with a combination of an ERA and a PDE5 inhibitor is better than starting on a single specific therapy (ERA or PDE5 inhibitor alone) in relationship with clinical outcome?

AMBITION A Randomised, Multicenter Study of First-Line Ambrisentan and Tadalafil Combination Therapy in Subjects with Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension Combination therapy with Tadalafil /Ambrisentan was selected because both medicines do not have clinically relevant drug-drug interactions when co-administered have once a day dosing & target separate pathways implicated in the pathobiology of PAH

Study Enrollment Criteria Key enrollment criteria: WHO Group 1 Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension (PAH) IPAH/HPAH; APAH (HIV, CTD, Drugs and Toxins, repaired simple CHD) Functional Class II or III Treatment naïve Age 18-75 Baseline 6MWD 125-500m Original Protocol Criteria (Intent to Treat (ITT)) PVR 240 dyn s/cm 5 PCWP or LVEDP 15 mmhg No exclusion of subjects with risk factors for left ventricular disease N. Galiè, et al. N Engl J Med 2015;373:834-44

Study Enrollment Criteria Key enrollment criteria: WHO Group 1 Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension (PAH) IPAH/HPAH; APAH (HIV, CTD, Drugs and Toxins, repaired simple CHD) Functional Class II or III Treatment naïve Age 18-75 Baseline 6MWD 125-500m Amendment 2: To reduce likelihood of enrolling subjects with PH due to covert diastolic dysfunction Original Protocol Criteria (Intent to Treat (ITT)) PVR 240 dyn s/cm 5 PCWP or LVEDP 15 mmhg No exclusion of subjects with risk factors for left ventricular disease Amendment 2 Changes (Primary Analysis Set (PAS)) PVR 300 dyn s/cm 5 PCWP a lowered to 12 mmhg in subjects with PVR 300 but < 500 dyn s/cm5 Exclusion of subjects with 3 of the following risk factors for left ventricular disease: BMI 30 History of essential hypertension Diabetes mellitus (any type) History of significant CAD N. Galiè, et al. N Engl J Med 2015;373:834-44 a PCWP requirement maintained at 15 mmhg In subjects with PVR 500 dyn s/cm 5

AMBITION: An Event Driven Trial with Time to First Clinical Failure Event as Primary Endpoint Combination arm: Ambrisentan + Tadalafil PAH Patients N = 610 (n=500 PAS) Randomized 2:1:1 to Combination arm or Monotherapy arm Monotherapy Arm: Ambrisentan + Placebo OR Monotherapy Arm: Tadalafil + Placebo 105 events in PAS: primary endpoint N. Galiè, et al. N Engl J Med 2015;373:834-44

AMBITION: An Event Driven Trial with Time to First Clinical Failure Event as Primary Endpoint Combination arm: Ambrisentan + Tadalafil PAH Patients N = 610 (n=500 PAS) Randomized 2:1:1 to Combination arm or Monotherapy arm Monotherapy Arm: Ambrisentan + Placebo OR Monotherapy Arm: Tadalafil + Placebo 105 events in PAS: primary endpoint Following the first event, subjects could receive blinded combination therapy, and remained in the study N. Galiè, et al. N Engl J Med 2015;373:834-44

Primary End Point: Clinical Failure Event Time (days) to first clinical failure event of PAH, defined as: Death (all-cause) or Hospitalization for worsening PAH* >15% decrease from baseline in 6MWD # and WHO functional class III or IV symptoms # or Disease progression* or Unsatisfactory long-term clinical response* * CEAC adjudicated Receiving 1 dose of treatment and being in the study 6 months and A decrease from baseline in 6MWD # and WHO functional class III symptoms for 6 months or longer At 2 clinic visits separated by 6 months # At 2 consecutive post-baseline visits separated by 14 days N. Galiè, et al. N Engl J Med 2015;373:834-44

Baseline Characteristics Characteristic Combination Therapy (n=253) Pooled Monotherapy Ambrisentan monotherapy (n=126) Tadalafil Monotherapy (n=121) (n=247) Age, y, mean ± SD 54.5 ±14.3 54.2 ± 14.9 53.9 ± 14.7 54.5 ±15.2 Female sex, n (%) 188 (74) 200 (81) 100 (79) 100 (83) Race/Race combinations, n (%) White 232 (92) 212 (86) 106 (85) 106 (88) African American / African Heritage 10 (4) 24 (10) 13 (10) 11 (9) Asian 5 (2) 7 (3) 4 (3) 3 (2) Other 6 (2) 3 (1) 3 (2) 1 (1) Region, n (%) North America 116 (46) 112 (45) 51 (41) 61 (50) Europe 129 (51) 128 (52) 72 (57) 56 (46) Asia Pacific 8 (3) 7 (3) 3 (2) 4 (3) N. Galiè, et al. N Engl J Med 2015;373:834-44

Baseline Characteristics Characteristic Combination Therapy (n=253) Pooled Monotherapy (n=247) Ambrisentan Monotherapy (n=126) Tadalafil Monotherapy (n=121) PAH classification, n (%) Idiopathic Heritable Associated with CTD Associated with CHD Associated with HIV Associated with drug use or toxin 127 (50) 7 (3) 103 (41) 5 (2) 5 (2) 6 (2) 138 (56) 7 (3) 84 (34) 4 (2) 4 (2) 10 (4) 72 (57) 3 (2) 44 (35) 1 (1) 2 (2) 4 (3) 66 (55) 4 (3) 40 (33) 3 (3) 2 (2) 6 (5) exposure Concomitant calcium channel 77 (30) 79 (32) 37 (29) 42 (35) blockers, n (%) No history of PAH therapy, n (%) 242 (96) 235 (96) 120 (97) 115 (95) Time from diagnosis to first study drug administration, days, median 20.0 25.0 20.5 29.0 N. Galiè, et al. N Engl J Med 2015;373:834-44

Baseline Characteristics Characteristic Combination Therapy (n=253) Pooled Monotherapy (n=247) Ambrisentan monotherapy (n=126) Tadalafil Monotherapy (n=121) Baseline Who Functional Class II 76 (30%) 79 (32%) 38 (30%) 41 (34%) III 177 (70%) 168 (68%) 88 (70%) 80 (66%) Baseline 6MWD (m) ± SD 353.5 (87.9) 351.7 (91.8) 354.2 (92.3) 349.2 (91.6) Hemodynamic variables RAP, mm Hg, mean ± SD 7.7 ± 4.5 7.9 ± 4.7 7.4 ± 4.6 8.4 ± 4.8 PAP, mm Hg, mean ± SD 48.1 ± 12.4 49.3 ± 12.6 50.4 ± 12.5 48.1 ± 12.6 PCWP, mm Hg, mean ± SD 8.4 ± 3.1 8.9 ± 3.4 8.6 ± 3.3 9.3 ± 3.5 CI, L/min/m 2, mean ± SD 2.41 ± 0.64 2.43 ± 0.71 2.41 ± 0.66 2.45 ± 0.77 PVR, dyne.sec/cm 5, mean ± SD 824.1 ± 467.0 825.7 ± 402.1 852.4 ± 394.7 798.0 ± 409.4 Time on study medication to FAV, 550.0 ± 340.8 NA 466.5 ± 341.4 501.2 ± 328.7 days, mean ± SD N. Galiè, et al. N Engl J Med 2015;373:834-44

Upfront combination therapy with ambrisentan/tadalafil reduced the risk of clinical failure Primary Endpoint: Time to First Clinical Failure Event (PrimaryAnalysis Set) 50% Risk Reduction 95% CIs (using log-log transform method) are presented for each treatment group at weeks 4, 8, 16, 24, and then every 12 weeks up to week 96. N. Galiè, et al. N Engl J Med 2015;373:834-44

First Adjudicated Clinical Failure by Subgroups Pooled Monotherapy CONFIDENTIAL N. Galiè, et al. N Engl J Med 2015;373:834-44

NT-proBNP: change from baseline to week 24 and treatment differences Ratio of NT-proBNP (pg/ml) to BASELINE Treatment ratios to COMBO Week 24 Combo vs pooled mono p<0.0001 Combo vs ambrisentan mono p=0.0070 Combo vs tadalafil mono p<0.0001 Vertical bars represent 95% CIs. Graph is a mixed models repeated measures (MMRM) analysis adjusted for baseline aetiology of PAH (IPAH/HPAH vs non-ipah), WHO FC (II vs III) and baseline, with no imputation for missing data. N. Galiè, et al. N Engl J Med 2015;373:834-44

6MWD: change from baseline to week 24 and treatment differences Median change in 6MWD (m) from baseline Median treatment difference with COMBO (m) Week 24 Combination: +49.0m Pooled mono: +23.8m Ambrisentan mono: +27.0m Tadalafil mono: +22.7m Vertical bars represent 95% CIs. Stratified Wilcoxon Rank Sum analysis. Worst rank scores were used for missing data following death or adjudicated hospitalisation; otherwise, LOCF imputation was used. N. Galiè, et al. N Engl J Med 2015;373:834-44

WHO FC change at week 24 Combination therapy (n=253) Pooled monotherapy (n=247) Ambrisentan monotherapy (n=126) Tadalafil monotherapy (n=121) Baseline WHO FC, observed, n 253 247 126 121 II 76 (30%) 79 (32%) 38 (30%) 41 (34%) III 177 (70%) 168 (68%) 88 (70%) 80 (66%) Week 24 WHO FC, observed, n 233 220 109 111 Improved 89 (38%) 80 (36%) 41 (38%) 39 (35%) No change 138 (59%) 133 ( 60%) 63 (58%) 70 (63%) Deteriorated 6 (3%) 7 (3%) 5 (5%) 2 (2%) Week 24 WHO FC, imputed*, n 252 244 124 120 Improved 94 (37%) 81 (33%) 42 (34%) 39 (33%) No change 146 (58%) 147 (60%) 73 (59%) 74 (62%) Deteriorated 12 (5%) 16 (7%) 9 (7%) 7 (6%) p value 0.2375 0.3011 0.3641 *Worst case imputation (0) was used for missing data following death or adjudicated hospitalisation; otherwise, LOCF imputation was used. Baseline data have not been used for imputation. p value from CMH tests stratified by baseline aetiology of PAH (IPAH/HPAH vs non-ipah) and WHO FC (II vs III). N. Galiè, et al. N Engl J Med 2015;373:834-44

Only adverse events on randomised treatment, with onset between first dose of study drug and last dose+30 days are shown Adverse Events ( 15% in COMB) AE Term n, (%) COMB (n=253) AMB Mono (n=126) TAD Mono (n=121) Any AE 247 (98%) 120 (95%) 114 (94%) Oedema peripheral 115 (45%) 41 (33%) 34 (28%) Headache 107 (42%) 41 (33%) 42 (35%) Nasal congestion 54 (21%) 19 (15%) 15 (12%) Diarrhoea 50 (20%) 29 (23%) 23 (19%) Dizziness 50 (20%) 24 (19%) 14 (12%) Dyspnoea 44 (17%) 22 (17%) 20 (17%) Nausea 43 (17%) 18 (14%) 20 (17%) Cough 40 (16%) 14 (11%) 21 (17%) Flushing 38 (15%) 18 (14%) 11 (9%) Anemia 37 (15%) 8 (6%) 14 (12%) Nasopharyngitis 37 (15%) 26 (21%) 18 (15%) Pain in extremity 37 (15%) 14 (11%) 18 (15%) Syncope 13 (5%) 7 (6%) 10 (8%)

Initial combination therapy with ambrisentan & tadalafil in CTD-PAH: subgroup analysis from the AMBITION trial Coghlan JG, et al. Ann Rheum Dis 2016;0:1 9.

Initial combination therapy with ambrisentan & tadalafil and mortality in pts with PAH: a secondary analysis of the results from the AMBITION study Hoeper MM et al. Lancet Respir Med 2016

Initial combination therapy with ambrisentan & tadalafil and mortality in pts with PAH: a secondary analysis of the results from the AMBITION study Hoeper MM et al. Lancet Respir Med 2016

Initial combination therapy with ambrisentan & tadalafil and mortality in pts with PAH: a secondary analysis of the results from the AMBITION study Initial combination therapy might be associated with a survival advantage compared with initial monotherapy in pts with newly diagnosed PAH This hypothesis needs to be addressed in future studies Hoeper MM et al. Lancet Respir Med 2016

Evidence based treatment algorithm for PAH patients PH guidelines 2015

Evidence based treatment algorithm for PAH patients Initial monotherapy Initial oral combination PH guidelines 2015