Aspartame: the experimental evidence of cancer risks

Similar documents
COMMITTEE ON CARCINOGENICITY OF CHEMICALS IN FOOD, CONSUMER PRODUCTS AND THE ENVIRONMENT

Consequences of Exposure to Carcinogens Beginning During Developmental Life

Aspartame induces lymphomas and leukaemias in rats Aspartame, a leukaemogenic compound

SCIENTIFIC OPINION. Scientific Opinion of the Panel on Food Additives and Nutrient Sources added to Food (EFSA-Q ) Adopted on 19 March 2009

A case study in risk assessment: aspartame

The EFSA Journal (2006) 356, 1-44

Carcinogenic effects of the low doses: the Ramazzini Institute experience. Dr. Fiorella Belpoggi. Annual Ramazzini Days 2012

ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH PERSPECTIVES

The European Ramazzini Foundation Project on Fuels, Their Constituents, Oxygenated Additives and Combustion Products

Evaluation of Ramazzini Institute Aspartame Studies and EFSA s Assessment

of 3-Aminophenol in B6D2F1 Mice

The Carcinogenic Effects of Aspartame: The Urgent Need for Regulatory Re-Evaluation

Previous EFSA reports on aspartame available at

- draft scientific opinion -

OPINION of the French Agency for Food, Environmental and Occupational Health & Safety

Statement on two recent scientific articles on the safety of artificial sweeteners 1

THE CARCINOGENIC EFFECTS OF ASPARTAME Devora Sara Gelbfish

Nonnutritive Sweeteners For Health Professionals

Conflict of Interest Disclosure

Glyphosate Cancer Risks and Failures of the Pesticide Regulatory Process

Recent findings on wireless radiation and health from the Ramazzini Institute could reinforce the NTP results

on the scientific evaluation of two studies related to the safety of artificial sweeteners 1

Results of Long-Term Carcinogenicity Bioassays on Tert-Amyl-Methyl-Ether (TAME) and Di-Isopropyl-Ether (DIPE) in Rats

Results of Long-Term Experimental Studies on the Carcinogenicity of Ethylene-bis- Dithiocarbamate (Mancozeb) in Rats

Observations of. Exposure Assessment in. Opinion on Aspartame. Presented by: Dr David Tennant Food Chemical Risk Analysis

Summary of Inhalation Carcinogenicity Study. of Tetrachloroethylene. in BDF 1 Mice

The truth behind aspartame: an examination of the adverse health effects associated with its consumption

Summary of Feed Carcinogenicity Study. of Diphenylamine. in F344 Rats

Berna Magnuson, Ph.D. University of Toronto On behalf of Calorie Control Council The Calorie Control Council

INTRODUCTION. KEY WORDS: life-span bioassay; rat; carcinogenicity; g-radiation; low-dose

ARTIFICIAL SWEETENERS: A MARKET WATCH

Sweeteners Overview. Nutritionists in Industry /SENSE meeting 24 April 2012

Glyphosate Hazard and Risk Assessment: A Comparison of the Approaches of Two International Agencies

Sugary foods and beverages hidden sugars

Case 3:16-md VC Document Filed 10/28/17 Page 1 of 38 EXHIBIT 96

SAB Report to the Board of the Glass Packaging Institute

International Safety Assessment of Sweeteners

A Weight of Evidence Approach to Cancer Assessment. Alan R Boobis Imperial College London

Fergus Cochrane Clerk to the Public Petitions Committee TG.01 The Scottish Parliament. Reference: FAS/0034

Overview of US EPA Assessment Activities for Perfluorooctanoic Acid (PFOA) and Perfluorooctane Sulfonate (PFOS)

Why we can be confident that low-calorie sweeteners are safe?

Tips for Managing Your Webinar Screen

Status of Activities on BPA

Low Calorie Sweeteners

aaaaaaaa Information Document on the Proposal to Reinstate Saccharin for Use as a Sweetener in Foods in Canada

Alternative sweeteners

Sugar and sweetener science. Heidi Wengreen, RD, PhD Professor of Nutrition Utah State University

5.15 HEXYTHIAZOX (176)

Food Additives Seminar Series Intense Sweeteners. Melanie Fisher General Manager Food Standards (Canberra)

Low-Calorie Sweeteners and Glucose Intolerance Craig A. Johnston, Ph.D.

Global Stevia Market: Size, Trends & Forecasts ( ) July 2017

Alternative sweeteners. What is sweetness? Why look for alternative sweeteners 12/15/2009

EU assessment of the carcinogenic potential of glyphosate

High intensive sweeteners An overview of non-nutritive (artificial) sweeteners used to reduce calories

Weighing Evidence from National Toxicology Program Cancer Bioassays

5.17 PENTHIOPYRAD (253)

IMPURITIES: GUIDELINE FOR RESIDUAL SOLVENTS PDE FOR CUMENE

Conflict of Interest Statement

An-Najah National University Sugars and Sweeteners in Foods

Yours sincerely, C. Guilhem de Seze EFSA Head of Department of Scientific Evaluation of Regulated Products. de Bruijn ECHA Director of Risk Management

Low-calorie sweeteners - recent evidence and its translation in the media

Synergism Between Sinusoidal-50 Hz Magnetic Field and Formaldehyde in Triggering Carcinogenic Effects in Male Sprague Dawley Rats

Summary of Inhalation Carcinogenicity Study. of Isopropyl Acetate. in F344 Rats

Use Of Sugars And Other Carbohydrates In The Food Industry READ ONLINE

ECHA Committee for Risk Assessment: Evaluation of the Classification and Labelling of Glyphosate

The Safety of Aspartame

3. Studies of Cancer in Experimental Animals

2.122 Other Alternative Sweeteners

Information for the package leaflet regarding aspartame and phenylalanine used as excipients in medicinal products for human use

5. Summary of Data Reported and Evaluation

Radiofrequency Radiation

Alternatives sweeteners

Are Fake Sugars Contributing to the Obesity Epidemic? Prenatal and early-life exposure to non-nutritive sweeteners and cardiometabolic health

TUMORS OF SPRAGUE-DAWLEY RATS INDUCED BY LONG-TERM FEEDING OF PHENACETIN*1

One can of soda a day. equals 31 pounds of sugar consumed at the end of the year! 7/31/2018

Neoplasia part I. Dr. Mohsen Dashti. Clinical Medicine & Pathology nd Lecture

Show Me the Evidence! Busting the Top Three Myths about Aspartame

COMMITTEE FOR VETERINARY MEDICINAL PRODUCTS

6.1. Feeding specifications for people with diabetes mellitus type 1

Coach on Call. Do you wonder what s in the little colored packets near the coffee, cream, and sugar? Do you wonder what makes diet soda sweet?

Daniela Chiozzotto, Morando Soffritti, Laura Falcioni, Eva Tibaldi, Fabiana Manservisi, Marco Manservigi, Luciano Bua, Fiorella Belpoggi.

جامعة تكريت كلية طب االسنان مادة طب الفم الوقائي املرحلة اخلامسة م. ازهار عماش حسني

(Text with EEA relevance)

2018 Texas Cancer Registry Annual Report

Dr Alan Barclay Cert III(Commercial Cookery); BSc(Nutrition and Food Science); Grad Dip (Dietetics); PhD

Dr/ Sherein Saeid AbdElgayed, ph.d

10 facts you should know about occupational carcinogens

Life-span exposure to sinusoidal-50 Hz magnetic field and acute low-dose γ radiation induce carcinogenic effects in Sprague-Dawley rats

Analysis of Common Sweeteners and Additives in Beverages with the PerkinElmer Flexar FX-15 System Equipped with a PDA Detector

International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) - Summaries & Evaluations

COMMITTEE FOR VETERINARY MEDICINAL PRODUCTS

10 facts you should know about occupational carcinogens

BAuA Federal Institute for Occupational Safety and Health Federal Office for Chemicals Friedrich-Henkel-Weg Dortmund, Germany

5. Summary of Data Reported and Evaluation

Dithianon DITHIANON (180)

How sweet it is: An examination of alternatives to sugar

FAQs on bisphenol A in consumer products

Comments on the National Toxicology Program Report on Cancer, Rats and Cell Phone Radiation. Bernard J. Feldman. Department of Physics and Astronomy

APPENDIX AVAILABLE ON THE HEI WEB SITE

The Current and Emerging Knowledge and Research on Non-Nutritive Sweeteners. November 16, 2018 (1-2 PM EST)

Transcription:

Ramazzini Institute Cesare Maltoni Cancer Research Center Aspartame: the experimental evidence of cancer risks Dr. Morando Soffritti, MD International Scientific Conference on Early exposures and childhood cancer London April 25, 2012

Artificial sweeteners (AS): general information (Part I) World Wars I and II mark the introduction of the artificial sweetener saccharin as a substitute for sucrose, its low cost enabling it to prevail From the early 70s the obesity problem grows in industrialized countries due in part to fast food and soft drink consumption Concurrently the demand for sweeteners in reducedcalorie foodstuffs increased Given the lucrative market for these so-called dietetic or light products, additional sweeteners emerged, including: aspartame, cyclammate, acesulfame-k, sucralose and neotame 2

Artificial sweeteners (AS): general information (Part II) As the artificial sweetener market expanded in the 80s and 90s, concern arose among consumers regarding their safety and possible long-term effects, especially the carcinogenic risk Most long-term carcinogenicity bioassays on artificial sweeteners performed on rodents in the past had not been adequately designed to assess the carcinogenic risks (as reported several times by Dr. David Rall, the founder of NTP in the US) 3

Artificial sweeteners (AS): general information (Part III) Because of globalization and the ever-increasing use of artificial sweeteners among billions of people in both industrialized and developing countries, in the late 1990s the Ramazzini Institute began an integrated project of mega-experiments to test the carcinogenic potential of aspartame and sucralose 4

Aspartame

Aspartame (APM): production and use 18,000 tons produced as of 2007 second artificial intense sweetening agent after saccharin 62% of the intense sweetening agents market present in more than 6,000 products hundreds of millions of consumers worldwide average daily intake in US and Europe Projected maximum consumption: 22-34 mg/kg b.w. Children/women of childbearing age: 2.5-5 mg/kg b.w. 6

APM: general information Metabolism: in the GI tract as aspartic acid, phenylalanine and methanol, both in humans and animals Genotoxicity: APM has been shown to be non genotoxic in various tests in vitro and in vivo Carcinogenicity 1970s and 1980s: studies on Sprague-Dawley rats, Wistar rats and Swiss mice, which we consider inadequate on the basis of the current standards for experimental design and conduct in rodent bioassays 2001: studies performed by NTP using transgenic mice models

The integrated experimental project of the Ramazzini Institute on Aspartame started in 1997

RI integrated project on APM administered with the feed Animals Experiment Species No. Status first S-D rats 1800 published (2005) second S-D rats 470 published (2007) third S-D rats 429 ongoing (biophase ended) fourth S-D rats 430 ongoing (biophase ended) fifth Swiss mice 852 published (2010) Total 3981 9

APM: materials and conduct Experiment phases: APM technical product, > 98.7% purity APM was administered with feed Water and food consumption Body weight Clinical control Complete necropsy Histopathology Statistical evaluation Cochran Armitage; poly-k test; Cox proportional hazard model 10

First Aspartame experiment (Sprague-Dawley rats)

First APM experiment on rats: the plan Age at start Animals dose/group ppm (mg/kg b.w.) a,b 100,000 (5,000) 50,000 (2,500) 10,000 (500) 2,000 (100) 400 (20) 80 (4) 0 (control) TOTAL 6 weeks 8 n. males n. females 100 100 100 150 150 150 150 900 100 100 100 150 150 150 150 900 Total 200 200 200 300 300 300 300 1800 a Considering the average weight of a rat as 400g, and average food consumption as 20g per day b The treatment lasts for the entire life span 12

First APM experiment on rats: the results Significant increased incidence of: lymphomas and leukemias in females (dose-related) preneoplastic atypical lesions and carcinomas of the renal pelvis and ureter in females (dose-related) malignant schwannomas of peripheral cranial nerves in males (dose-related) 13

Second Aspartame experiment (Sprague-Dawley rats)

Second APM experiment on rats: the plan Age at start Animals Dose/group,ppm (mg/kg b.w.) a,b 2,000 (100) 400 (20) 0 (control) TOTAL Fetal life Fetal life n. males n. females 70 70 95 235 70 70 95 235 Total 140 140 190 470 a Considering the average weight of a rat as 400g, and average food consumption as 20g per day b The treatment lasted for the entire life span 15

Second APM experiment on rats: mammary cancers (%) Animals dose/group, ppm (mg/kg b.w.) a 2,000 (100) 400 (20) 0 (control) Males (%) 2.9 - - Females (%) 15.7* 7.1 5.3* a p-values associated with the trend test are near the control incidence * significant (p<0.05) using Cox Regression Model 16

Second APM experiment on rats: lymphomas and leukemias (%) Animals dose/group ppm (mg/kg b.w.) a 2,000 (100) 400 (20) 0 (control) Males (%) 17.1* 15.7 9.5 Females (%) 31.4** 17.1 12.6** a p-values associated with the trend test are near the control incidence * significant (p<0.05) using Cox Regression Model ** significant (p<0.01) using Cox Regression Model 17

Comparison of lymphomas/leukemias in females: prenatal vs. postnatal exposure Dose, ppm (mg/kg b.w.) Females with lymphomas/leukemias (%) a, b, c Prenatal exposure Postnatal exposure 2,000 (100) 31.4 18.7 # 400 (20) 17.1 20.0 ## 0 (control) 12.6 8.7(** # ) c a B c p-values corresponding to pairwise comparison between the controls and the dosed group are near the dosed group incidence. p-values associated with the trend test are near the control incidence The p-values associated with the trend test refer to the 7 groups of the first APM experiment ** Statistically significant (p<0.01) using the Cochran-Armitage test # Statistically significant (p<0.05) using the poly-k test (k = 3) ## Statistically significant (p<0.01) using the poly-k test (k = 3) Statistically significant (p<0.01) using the Cox Regression Model 18

Comparison of the cumulative prevalence of hemolymphoreticular neoplasia in rats by age at death Cumulative prevalence (%) 40 35 30 25 20 15 10 5 0 Prenatal exposure 0-16 17-32 33-48 49-64 65-80 81-96 97-112 113-128 129-144 145-160 Age at death (weeks) Start of treatment 2000 ppm 400 ppm 0 ppm (control) 40 35 30 Postnatal exposure Cumulative prevalence (%) 25 20 15 10 5 0 0-16 17-32 33-48 49-64 65-80 81-96 97-112 113-128 129-144 145-160 Age at death (weeks) 19

III APM Experiment on Swiss mice

Swiss mice experiment on APM: the plan Age at start Animals 32,000 Dose/group, ppm a (mg/kg b.w.) 16,000 8,000 2,000 0 TOTAL (3910) (1920) (990) (240) (Control) fetal n. males 83 64 73 122 102 444 n. fetal 62 64 62 103 117 408 females Total 145 128 135 225 219 852 a The treatment lasts for the entire life span 21

Swiss mice experiment on APM: Alveolar Bronchiolar Adenomas (A/BA) and Carcinomas (A/BC) in males a (%) Animals Tumors Dose/group, ppm (mg/kg b.w.) 32,000 16,000 8,000 2,000 0 (3910) (1920) (990) (240) Males A/BA 7.2 10.9 11.3 8.7 6.8 Males A/BC 13.3* 12.5 11.3 5.8 6.0* Total 20.5 # 23.4 22.6 14.6 12.8 # a p-values associated with the trend test are near the control incidence * significant (p<0.05) using the Cox Regression Model # significant (p<0.05) using Logistic analysis 22

Swiss mice experiment: Hepatocellular Adenomas (HA)/ Carcinomas (HCC) in males a, % Animals Tumors Dose/group, ppm (mg/kg b.w.) 32,000 16,000 8,000 2,000 0 (3910) (1920) (990) (240) Males HA 2.4 9.4 6.5 9.7 7.7 Males HCC 18.1** 15.6* 14.5 11.7 5.1** Total 20.5 25.0 # 21.0 21.4 12.8 a p-values associated with the trend test are near the control incidence * significant (p<0.05) using the Cox Regression Model ** significant (p<0.01) using the Cox Regression Model # significant (p<0.05) using Logistic analysis 23

Summary of the carcinogenic effects of APM in rodents Significantly increased malignant tumors Species Age at start Lymph/ leuk Kidneys CP Nervous sys. MS Mammary ADC Lung ADC Liver HCC M F M F M F M F M F M F S-D rats 8 weeks + DR + DR + DR S-D rats fetal + + DR + DR S-mice fetal + DR + DR += significantly increased; DR= Dose-related; CP= Carcinomas of the pelvis & ureter; MS= Malignant Schwannomas; ADC= Adenocarcinomas; HCC= Hepatocellular carcinomas; 24

Conclusions on the APM project In our experimental conditions APM has been shown to induce a significantly increased incidence of malignant tumors in: multiple tissues in male and female rats multiple tissues in male mice earlier occurrence in treated animals higher incidence and anticipated onset of cancers when the treatment starts from fetal life The carcinogenic effects of APM were also shown at dose levels to which humans could be exposed 25

Conclusive remarks On the basis of the results of our experiments, we believe that action must be taken to review the present regulation governing the use of aspartame and sucralose This review is particularly necessary if we consider that children and women in childbearing age are the major consumers It must be noted that on the basis of our results on APM, the European Food Safety Authority was requested by the European Parliament to review all the scientific literature available on Aspartame in order to update the regulation in Europe before the end of this year instead of 2020 as it was planned

Concluding remarks > This review has been organized with better transparency in order to allow all social parties to express their judgment based on the knowledge of all the data available > This is the only way to prevent a conflict of interest among the agency consultants which represent the shadow cone in relations between science and civil society 27