An overview on adynamic bone disease clinical and therapeutical approaches

Similar documents
Secondary Hyperparathyroidism: Where are we now?

CKD-MBD CKD mineral bone disorder

Kobe University Repository : Kernel

CKD-Mineral Bone Disorder (MBD) Pathogenesis of Metabolic Bone Disease. Grants: NIH, Abbott, Amgen, OPKO, Shire

Guidelines and new evidence on CKD - MBD treatment

Ramzi Vareldzis, MD Avanelle Jack, MD Dept of Internal Medicine Section of Nephrology and Hypertension LSU Health New Orleans September 13, 2016

Metabolic Bone Disease Related to Chronic Kidney Disease

Vascular calcification in stage 5 Chronic Kidney Disease patients on dialysis

2017 KDIGO Guidelines Update

Hyperphosphatemia is associated with a

Do We Do Too Many Parathyroidectomies in Dialysis? Sagar Nigwekar MD, MMSc Massachusetts General Hospital

chapter 1 & 2009 KDIGO

Reversal of adynamic bone disease by lowering of dialysate calcium

OPEN. Masahiro Yoshikawa 1,2, Osamu Takase 1,2, Taro Tsujimura

HYDROCHLORIDE FOR THE TREATMENT OF SECONDARY HYPERPARATHYROIDISM IN PATIENTS WITH END-STAGE RENAL DISEASE ON MAINTENANCE DIALYSIS THERAPY

Cinacalcet treatment in advanced CKD - is it justified?

Improved Assessment of Aortic Calcification in Japanese Patients Undergoing Maintenance Hemodialysis

Therapeutic golas in the treatment of CKD-MBD

Introduction/objective: Adinamic bone disease (ABD) is a common finding in peritoneal. dialysis (PD) and is associated with a

Renal Association Clinical Practice Guideline in Mineral and Bone Disorders in CKD

Treatment Options for Chronic Kidney

CKD: Bone Mineral Metabolism. Peter Birks, Nephrology Fellow

Treatment Options for Chronic Kidney. Goce Spasovski, R. Macedonia

Management of CKD. Goce Spasovski, R. Macedonia

Level 1 Strong We recommendyshould A High Moderate Level 2 Weak We suggestymight C Low Very low. K Hyperphosphatemia has been associated with poor

Comparison of Serum Parathyroid Hormone (PTH) Levels in Hemodialysis and Peritoneal Dialysis Patients. Int.J.Curr.Res.Aca.Rev.2016; 4(11):

K/DOQI-recommended intact PTH levels do not prevent low-turnover bone disease in hemodialysis patients

Incorporating K/DOQI Using a Novel Algorithm Approach: Regina Qu Appelle s Experience

CLINICAL PRACTICE GUIDELINE CKD-MINERAL AND BONE DISORDERS (CKD-MBD) Final Version (01/03/2015)

Effects of Kidney Disease on Cardiovascular Morbidity and Mortality

Month/Year of Review: September 2012 Date of Last Review: September 2010

Management of mineral and bone disorders in renal transplant recipients

Attivazione selettiva dei VDR nella CKD-MBD: dalla conservativa alla dialisi

Bone Disorders in CKD

( ) , (Donabedian, 1980) We would not choose any treatment with poor outcomes

Benefits and Harms of Phosphate Binders in CKD: A Systematic Review of Randomized Controlled Trials

Setting the standard

Metabolic Bone Disease (Past, Present and Future Challenges in the Management)

Should cinacalcet be used in patients who are not on dialysis?

Persistent knee pain in a patient with systemic lupus erythematosus

Chapter 5: Evaluation and treatment of kidney transplant bone disease Kidney International (2009) 76 (Suppl 113), S100 S110; doi: /ki.2009.

Velphoro (sucroferric oxyhydroxide)

Renal Osteodystrophy. Chapter 6. I. Introduction. Classification of Bone Disease. Eric W. Young

Month/Year of Review: May 2014 Date of Last Review: September New Drug Evaluation: Sucrofferic Oxyhydroxide (Velphoro )

BONE AND MINERAL METABOLISM in the PD PATIENT

New biological targets for CKD- MBD: From the KDOQI to the

Mineral and bone disorders in chronic kidney disease and end-stage renal disease patients: new insights into vitamin D receptor activation

Hemodialysis: slightly beyond basics Dialysate calcium and magnesium concentrations

Drugs for the treatment of secondary hyperparathyroidism and hyperphosphataemia

The impact of improved phosphorus control: use of sevelamer hydrochloride in patients with chronic renal failure

Differences in bone turnover and intact PTH levels between African American and Caucasian patients with end-stage renal disease

The role of calcimimetics in chronic kidney disease

Ipovitaminosi D e metabolismo calcio-fosforo in dialisi peritoneale. Maurizio Gallieni Università degli Studi di Milano

02/27/2018. Objectives. To Replace or Not to Replace: Nutritional Vitamin D in Dialysis.

Sensipar. Sensipar (cinacalcet) Description

Total Parathyroidectomy with Forearm Autotransplantation as the Treatment of Choice for Secondary Hyperparathyroidism

DEGREE (if applicable)

International Journal of Health Sciences and Research ISSN:

Nuove terapie in ambito Nefrologico: Etelcalcetide (AMG-416)

Marie-Claude Monier-Faugere, Hanna Mawad, and Hartmut H. Malluche

KDIGO. CKD- MBD: Is the Term S2ll Jus2fied? Tilman B. Drüeke

KDOQI COMMENTARY VOL 55, NO 5, MAY 2010

PART FOUR. Metabolism and Nutrition

NIH Public Access Author Manuscript Am J Kidney Dis. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2011 May 1.

RENAL OSTEODYSTROPHY continues to

Secondary hyperparathyroidism in dialysis patients

Osteoporosis and Chronic Kidney Disease: Diagnosis and Treatment Recommendations

Persistent post transplant hyperparathyroidism. Shiva Seyrafian IUMS-97/10/18-8/1/2019

The hart and bone in concert

The CARI Guidelines Caring for Australasians with Renal Impairment. Serum phosphate GUIDELINES

Contents. Authors Name: Christopher Wong: Consultant Nephrologist Anne Waddington: Renal Pharmacist Eimear Fegan : Renal Dietitian

Association Between the Vascular Calcification and High Turnover Radiographic Bone Changes in Chronic Kidney Disease Patients

The Skeletal Response to Aging: There s No Bones About It!

Nuclear Chromatin-concentrated Osteoblasts in Renal Bone Diseases

The role of bone biopsy in the management of patients with CKD - MBD

We are IntechOpen, the world s leading publisher of Open Access books Built by scientists, for scientists. International authors and editors

TRANSPARENCY COMMITTEE OPINION. 22 July 2009

The CARI Guidelines Caring for Australasians with Renal Impairment. Biochemical Targets. Calcium GUIDELINES

GUIDELINE 1. EVALUATION OF CALCIUM AND PHOSPHORUS METABOLISM

Sensipar (cinacalcet)

Bone strength is proportional to bone mass, measured with DXA. Bone turnover markers indicate the status of bone quality.

Bone Disease after Kidney Transplantation

2.0 Synopsis. Paricalcitol Capsules M Clinical Study Report R&D/15/0380. (For National Authority Use Only)

Pediatric CKD-MBD: pathophysiology and management

Improvement of adynamic bone disease after renal transplantation

Normal kidneys filter large amounts of organic

Original epidemiologic studies 1 have suggested that approximately

Mehruba Alam Ananna, Wasim Md. Mohosin Ul Haque, Muhammad Abdur Rahim, Tufayel Ahmed Chowdhury, Tabassum Samad, Md. Mostarshid Billah, Sarwar Iqbal

Left ventricular hypertrophy: why does it happen?

Recent advances in the noninvasive diagnosis of renal osteodystrophy

A new era in phosphate binder therapy: What are the options?

Clinical Guideline Bone chemistry management in adult renal patients on dialysis

Prof. Michel Jadoul Cliniques universitaires St-Luc Université Catholique de Louvain Brussels, Belgium. Slide 1

Tenapanor, a gastrointestinal NHE3 inhibitor, reduces serum phosphate in patients with chronic kidney disease stage 5D and hyperphosphatemia

Index. B BMC. See Bone mineral content BMD. See Bone mineral density Bone anabolic impact, Bone mass acquisition

THE FIELD OF mineral metabolism and

Ying Liu, 1 Wen-Chin Lee, 2 Ben-Chung Cheng, 2 Lung-Chih Li, 2 Chih-Hsiung Lee, 2 Wen-Xiu Chang, 1 and Jin-Bor Chen 2. 1.

Klotho: renal and extra-renal effects

Effects of Diabetes Mellitus, Age, and Duration of Dialysis on Parathormone in Chronic Hemodialysis Patients. Hamid Nasri 1, Soleiman Kheiri 2

Cardiovascular Mortality: General Population vs ESRD Dialysis Patients

Transcription:

2014/2015 Mariana Barata Santos Barreira de Jesus An overview on adynamic bone disease clinical and therapeutical approaches março, 2015

Mariana Barata Santos Barreira de Jesus An overview on adynamic bone disease clinical an therapeutical approaches Mestrado Integrado em Medicina Área: Nefrologia Tipologia:Monografia Trabalho efetuado sob a Orientação de: Doutor João Frazão Trabalho organizado de acordo com as normas da revista: Renal Failure março, 2015

Aos meus pais e às minhas irmãs.

clinical and therapeutical approaches M. Jesus 1, João M. Frazão 1,2 1 School of Medicine of Porto University, Porto, Portugal 2 Nephrology Department, Centro Hospitalar de São João, EPE, Porto, Portugal and Nephrology and Infectiology Research and Development Group, INEB, Portugal Author data: Mariana Barata Santos Barreira de Jesus Hospital de S. João, Serviço de Nefrologia, Alameda Hernâni Monteiro, 4200 Porto, Portugal mbsb.jesus@gmail.com Fax: +351 228312529 Professor Doutor João Miguel Machado Dória Frazão Hospital de S. João, Serviço de Nefrologia, Alameda Hernâni Monteiro, 4200 Porto, Portugal jmmdfrazao@gmail.com Fax: +351 228312529 Corresponding author: Professor Doutor João M. Frazão Serviço de Nefrologia, Alameda Hernâni Monteiro, 4200 Porto, Portugal jmmdfrazao@gmail.com 1

Key Words: adynamic bone disease; chronic kidney disease; mineral and bone disorder; vascular calcification; low calcium dialysate; non-calcium containing phosphate binders. 2

Abstract Adynamic Bone disease is a bone and mineral disorder that reflects abnormalities in calcium homeostasis with low calcium buffer capacity and inability to handle this ion s extra load. Its prevalence has been rising in the latest two decades as a result of generalized use of calcium-containing phosphate binders combined with vitamin D receptor agonists. The association between Adynamic Bone Disease and diabetes mellitus, as well as peritoneal dialysis, the Wnt signaling inhibitor sclerostin and the malnutrition-inflammation complex reflects the unknown multifactorial causes that lead to this disease. The gold-standard method for the diagnosis of Adynamic Bone Disease is bone biopsy with tetracycline labeling, however, this is an invasive, expensive method that is not widely available, and so, biochemical markers, such as serum Parathyroid Hormone are used to make the diagnosis, even though they cannot fully replace bone biopsy. One of the greatest burdens of Chronic Kidney Disease is vascular calcification. This active process leads to arterial stiffening and to higher cardiovascular and noncardiovascular mortality rates. Interestingly, lower levels of Parathyroid Hormone, as seen in patients with Adynamic Bone Disease, are associated with higher mortality rates than higher levels. The objectives of the treatment of this disorder are mainly to prevent the excessive calcium load, using lower calcium dialysate, non-calcium-containing phosphate binders and avoiding Vitamin D therapy. Some novel therapies are being tested, such as Teriparatide and Menatetrenone, but no definite conclusions can be taken at this moment on the effect of these agents. 3

Introduction Chronic Kidney Disease (CKD) is an global public health problem affecting 5-10% of the world population 1. As the kidney function declines there is a deterioration of the mineral homeostasis with altered serum and tissue concentration of phosphorus and calcium as well as changes in circulating levels of hormones. In the course of CKD there is a reduction in the ability of the kidney to excrete an adequate load of phosphate which leads to hyperphosphatemia, elevation of parathyroid hormone (PTH) and FGF-23. The conversion of 25(OH)D to 1,25(OH)D is impaired, stimulating PTH secretion. The kidney also fails to respond adequately to PTH (that increases calcium reabsorption and promotes phosphaturia) and to FGF-23 (that increases phosphaturia). As this functions are of crucial importance to the metabolism of bone is not surprising that bone anomalies are present in virtually every patient with CKD stage 5D (requiring dialysis) and in the majority of patients in stage 3-5 1. Recently, more importance as been given to the canonical wnt signaling. Wnt ligands bind to the LRP5/6 membrane receptor complex increasing bone formation. Sclerostin is a wnt signaling inhibitor, decreasing bone formation and osteoblast activity 2. A cross-sectional study, showed higher levels of serum sclerostin in patients with stage 5 CKD when compared to no CKD controls. This might be due to an increased retention or production 3. In this study only sclerostin was associated with bone turn-over, pointing to a superior value of this parameter as a noninvasive indicator of bone turn-over. However, this superiority was only observed in high turn-over bone disease. A recent cross-sectional study evaluated serum and trabecular bone surface sclerostin in peritoneal dialysis patients showing that, not only were both parameters elevated in these patients, but they were also negatively associated to bone alkaline phosphatase and bone formation rate 2. When serum and trabecular bone 4

surface sclerostin were analyzed separately in diabetic and nondiabetic patients the same study showed that both serum and trabecular bone surface sclerostin were higher in the first group. Moreover, there was also showed a difference in the pattern of distribution of the trabecular bone surface sclerostin between patients with high turn-over (95% of patients with sclerostin expression in deeper osteocytes and only 5% of them with diffuse distribution) and low turn-over (52.4% of the patients with sclerostin expression in deeper osteocytes and the remaining patients with diffuse distribution). This mineral and hormonal changes go beyond bone alterations and are responsible for systemic consequences such as vascular calcification 1. These changes have a major impact on morbidity and mortality 4 and consequently their control is of great importance in CKD patients. Chronic Kidney Disease-Mineral and Bone Disorder (CKD-BMD) should be used to refer to this broader clinical syndrome that includes mineral, bone and vascular alterations that emerge as a consequence of CKD. Renal osteodystrophy is the term used to describe only the bone pathology associated with CKD, which include changes in bone turn-over, mineralization and volume 1. The diagnosis of renal osteodystrophy requires a bone biopsy and uses a classification based on parameters of bone Turn-over, Mineralization and Volume (TMV) 5. Bone turn-over can be classified as high, normal or low while mineralization is classified as normal or abnormal. Based on this 3 parameters renal osteodystrophy is divides in 6 diseases: hyperparathyroid bone disease (high turn-over, normal mineralization and any bone volume), mixed bone disease (high turn-over, abnormal mineralization and normal volume), osteomalacia (low turn-over, abnormal mineralization and low to normal bone volume), adynamic bone disease (ABD) (low turn-over, normal mineralization and normal to low bone volume), amyloid bone disease and aluminum bone disease. The purpose of this review is to focus primarily on ABD, its etiology, clinical manifestations and therapeutical options. 5

Methods With the purpose of reviewing the current knowledge of ABD in its etiology, clinical manifestations and therapeutical options available was conducted a search in the Pubmed electronic database including the following key words: chronic kidney disease, mineral bone disorder, renal osteodystrophy, adynamic bone disease, low PTH, low turnover, vascular calcification, Teriparatide, Sevelamer and Lanthanum carbonate. The search was limited to papers published between January 2008 and January 2015 and articles in English or Portuguese. Opinion papers and editorials were excluded. Papers that, after careful reading of the title, abstract and/or full text, did not met the purpose of this review were also excluded. Adding to this, there were also included in the search publications referenced in the papers analyzed that brought value to the present review. In the end of the process, 57 papers were included. 6

Results Adynamic bone disease ABD is a bone lesion characterized by low bone turn-over, with the dynamic histomorphometric parameters both bone formation rate and activation frequency markedly reduced, with normal mineralization, which is represented in the bone biopsy as an absence of excess osteoid deposition. This happens because in these patients the rate of deposition of the osteoid is so low that the mineralization defect is not even manifested 6. This absence of osteoid is the major difference between ABD and osteomalacia, another low turn-over bone lesion in which the mineralization defect is greater than the collagen deposition defect leading to osteoid deposition 6. A reduced number of osteoblasts with minimal to none peritrabecular or marrow fibrosis are also indicative of ABD 7. At the moment, ABD is an important health problem in patients in CKD stage 5. A Portuguese study involving hemodialysis population showed that this bone lesion was the most common in this population, with a biopsy-proven prevalence of 59% at baseline 8. This shows the ever growing need to fully understand this disease as well as to develop therapeutical approaches that successfully reduce this high prevalence. 7

Etiology of adynamic bone disease ABD was first described in association with aluminum overload and this was, in the past, the major cause of this bone lesion 9. Aluminum deposition along the calcification fronts prevents the mineralization process and also inhibits the deposition of osteoid by directly damaging the osteoblasts 10. A chronic low dose exposure to aluminum in association with high dosages of vitamin D receptor (VDR) analogs is believe to lead preferentially to ABD rather than to osteomalacia 11, the bone lesion most commonly associated with aluminum overload. The major sources of aluminum were the dialysate, prior to the use of reverse osmosis as a dialysis water treatment, as well as the use of aluminum hydroxide as a phosphate binder 7. Although effective, this phosphate binders are no longer widely used due to their established toxicity 12. This, in addition to the widespread of the reverse osmosis may have been responsible for the decreased aluminum intoxication from 40%, in biopsies carried out before 1995 to 20%, in biopsies taken after 1995 1. Due to this, aluminum induced low turn-over disease as become progressively less frequent and, at this moment, is considered a residual lesion 7. The incidence of ABD rose again in 1995, this time not associated with aluminum toxicity, but as the result of the generalized usage of calcium-containing phosphate binders 13. These agents increase calcium load, which leads to the suppression of PTH. Evidence that dates back to 1994 shows that ABD isn t merely an academic finding, but a mineral and bone disorder that produces an abnormal calcium homeostasis 14. This study showed a normal or slightly decreased plasma calcium efflux and calcium accretion rate as well as a disproportionately low calcium retention in patients with low turn-over disease. This results in a very low capacity to buffer calcium and also an inability to handle extra calcium load. Also, the suppression of PTH is especially striking when calcium-containing phosphate binders are combined with VDR agonists, which further suppress PTH secretion. This knowledge has led to changes in the treatment of patients 8

with ABD, including the discontinuing of the intravenous vitamin D therapy, as well as the substitution of calcium-containing phosphate binders with the newer non- calciumcontaining phosphate binders, such as sevelamer and lanthanum carbonate 15. The purpose of these changes is to avoid further reduction of PTH secretion, which increases the risk of ABD. However, the emergence of selective VDR agonists, such as paricalcitol, may cause changes in the way we treat ABD. This new agents showed a lower risk of hypercalcaemia, hyperphosphatemia and elevated calcium-phosphate products levels when compared to the active vitamin D formulations, such as calcitriol 16. This data combined with some recent studies that suggest that patients with PTH <= 150 pg/ml receiving VDR agonists, specially paricalcitol, have lower mortality rates than untreated patients 17 may indicate a role for selective VDR agonists in the treatment of ABD, however, more studies need to be conducted in order to fully understand this association. ABD is also associated with clinical factors, such as older age, peritoneal dialysis and diabetes mellitus 13. The association with peritoneal dialysis was studied in a recent cross-sectional study in which bone histomorphometry revealed lower turn-over parameters and worst mineralization in peritoneal dialysis patients when compared to hemodialysis patients 2. The same study also showed a much larger prevalence of ABD in diabetic patients (78%) when compared to nondiabetic patients (26%). Three hypotheses have been proposed to explain the great influence of diabetes mellitus on the development of ABD. The first one states that advanced glycation products stimulate osteoblast apoptosis and therefore, reduce bone formation 18. The second hypothesis claims that low vitamin D in diabetic patients is implicated in the pathogenesis of this disease 15. The third and most recent one asserts that the reduced bone turn-over found in diabetic patients is mediated by sclerostin, the wnt signaling inhibitor, which is elevated in this group of patients 2. Malluche et al, in 2011, showed that white patients are more 9

likely to present with low turn-over than black patients 19. This association had not been reported in previous studies. Recently, the hypothesis that low PTH, the primary biochemical marker for ABD, might be associated with the malnutrition-inflammation complex has been explored. A study by Dukkipati et al showed that low PTH was associated with energy-wasting and inflammation and that this association virtually nullified any possible relation between PTH and alkaline phosphatase in these PTH ranges 20. This study also showed that, when corrected for case-mix and surrogates of malnutrition and inflammation, a PTH in the range of 100-150 pg/ml was associated with greater survival when compared to other ranges of PTH. This is of clinical importance as it might signify that after controlling the malnutrition-inflammation complex, a level of PTH under the KDIGO guidelines recommended range of 150-300 pg/ml is associated with a greatest survival. Other authors have postulated that ABD might be a secondary phenomenon and a consequence of the malnutrition-inflammation complex 21 and these results might point to this direction. These findings point to a multifactorial etiology of ABD, with more contributing elements than those known at this point. In order to properly diagnose and manage patients that already have ABD, as well as to prevent the development of this disease in CKD stage 5 patients, is important to conduct more studies that help us understand not only which are these unknown factors, but also has they connect with each other. 10

Diagnosis of adynamic bone disease The definitive diagnosis of renal osteodystrophy, requires a bone biopsy 1. This is done by the histomorphometric analysis of an undecalcified bone sample that requires a prebiopsy tetracycline labelling as well as aluminum and amyloid stains for a complete workup. In order to correctly diagnosis and differentiate the different types of renal osteodystrophy assessment of bone turn-over, mineralization and fibrosis are required 11. However, in clinical practice, this can t always be done because it is an invasive, time consuming, and expensive procedure not widely available 5. Considering this, biochemical abnormalities are the most commonly used indicators by which the diagnosis of MBD is made 1 even with the knowledge that none of the biochemical markers for bone reabsorption, formation or parathyroid status are accurate enough to replace the bone biopsy 11. According to the Kidney Disease Outcomes Quality Initiative, in patients with CKD stage 5, PTH concentration should be measured regularly and maintained within 150-300 pg/ml. However, Barreto et al showed that even within the target range (150-300 pg/ml) the most common finding on bone biopsy was low turn-over (n=22, 63,6%) and that only a small number of patients in this range presented with normal bone turn-over (n=22, 9%) 22. A study with overlapping results was performed in Portugal by Ferreira et al in which a prevalence of ABD of 59% with PTH levels within KIDIGO target range is reported 8. The first generation of PTH assays were radioimmunoassays which measured not only the PTH 1-84 molecule but also its fragments produced in the liver and eliminated by the kidney that accumulate in patients with CKD, producing highly increased levels of PTH and with poor sensitivity for low PTH concentration 23. These assays are considered obsolete in the present day. Serum PTH is a combination of PTH1-84, the full hormone, 11

as well as its carboxy-terminal fragments 24. The most important of this fragments is PTH7-84, which is also detected by the second generation PTH assays, the intact PTH assays 25. More recently, the third generation assays, the whole PTH assays, where developed. Using an N-terminal antibody directed against the first amino-acids this assay does not measure the PTH 7-84 23. Therefore, the difference between the values measured with the intact PTH assay and the whole PTH assay represents the PTH 7-84 concentration. It has been demonstrated that PTH 7-84 antagonizes the calcemic response to PTH 1-84, probably modulating the effects of PTH 1-84 on bone 25. This antagonizing effect was explored Mauniere-Faugere et al in a study that proposes the use of the PTH 1-84/PTH Carboxy terminal fragments ratio as a method of predicting bone turn-over 26. The study showed the superiority of this ration in predicting bone turn-over when compared to all other biochemical markers, alone or in combination. Predominance of the active PTH 1-84 form is associated with high bone turn-over and predominance of the PTH Carboxyl terminal fragments is associated with low bone turn-over. However, this superiority was not confirmed in a more recent report 27. Both the second and third generation assays are used in the clinical practice introducing a great inter-method variability. The intra-method variability also represents a problem and its due to the lack of standardization and antibody specificity 25. Bone alkaline phosphatase is a fraction of the serum alkaline phosphatase produced by the osteoblasts. It is very important marker of bone formation and its elevated levels virtually exclude the presence of ABD 7. A recent study with 41 peritoneal dialysis patients demonstrated that bone alkaline phosphatase was, not only, a good marker for bone turn-over, but a slight superiority of bone alkaline phosphatase was found when 12

compared to intact PTH 2. This biochemical parameter is particularly useful in patients with liver disease. Serum PTH values below 100pg/ml or above 800pg/ml have a good diagnostic value for ABD and high turn-over disease, respectively. Is in the patients presenting with serum PTH levels between 100pg/ml and 500pg/ml that lays the greater difficulty in reaching a satisfying diagnosis without performing a bone biopsy 7. 13

Clinical presentation of adynamic bone disease Bone Fractures Due to the impaired bone remodeling process, patients with ABD have poorer repair of microfractures. This leads to more frequent episodes of fractures 28. A study by Atsumi et al that evaluated compression vertebral fractures in hemodialysis patients showed that the subgroup with the lowest percentile of PTH had the highest risk of these fractures 29. Another study, by Coco et al, presented similar results with hip fractures, with patients with the lower PTH levels being more likely to sustain hip fractures than the ones with higher PTH levels 30. In both studies, patients with CKD presented with significantly higher fracture risk than the patients without CKD. Cardiovascular calcification Cardiovascular calcifications represent an important problem in patients with End Stage Renal Disease 11. Besides common atherosclerosis with patchy calcification of atherosclerotic plaques, hemodialysis patients also present mediasclerosis 31. The second one seems to be related to mineral disturbances associated with CKD and represents an active process in which vascular muscle cells differentiate into osteoblasts as a response to stimuli such as hyperphosphatemia 31. To establish the influence of hyperphosphatemia and its mechanisms in vascular calcification a human aortic muscle cell culture was exposed to phosphate levels comparable to those found in hyperphosphatemic patients and a dose-dependent increase in cell culture calcium deposition was showed. Also, when exposed to these levels of phosphate, an enhanced expression of osteocalcin and Cbfa-1, known osteogenic markers, was shown. These changes were mediated by a sodium-dependent phosphate cotransporter (NPC) 31. These findings reveal the active nature of this process, but, such as this one, there are 14

probably more pathways involved in vascular calcification, and for this reason the continuing search on this area is of great importance. Cardiovascular calcification represents an important problem due to its impact in mortality and morbidity. Coronary artery calcification progression was associated with progressive deterioration of arterial stiffness and cardiac repolarization 32. Another study reported that the presence of arterial calcifications in end stage renal disease is highly predictive of all-cause mortality and cardiovascular mortality and also that arterial media calcifications represent an independent prognostic marker for all-cause mortality as well as cardiovascular mortality in hemodialysis patients 33. A simple vascular calcification score based on plane radiographic films of the pelvis and hands has shown to be a simple tool useful to the assessment of cardiovascular risk related to vascular calcification in hemodialysis patients 34. A score of 3 or higher was independently associated with peripheral artery disease, coronary artery disease and vascular disease. These patients also presented a 3.9 fold increase risk of cardiovascular mortality, a 2.9 fold increase in cardiovascular hospitalizations as well as a 2.4 fold increase in the risk of fatal and nonfatal cardiovascular events. The association between cardiovascular calcification and low bone turn-over has been described by several authors. A study, published in 2004 by London et al, compared bone histomorphometric characteristics with the arterial calcification scores (0 to 4) which were determined through the number of sites with arterial calcifications using ultrasound evaluation. The study showed that patients with highest arterial calcifications scores (3 and 4) had lower PTH levels, lower osteoclast numbers and osteoblastic surfaces, smaller or absent double tetracycline-labeled surfaces as well as higher percentages of aluminum stain surfaces, which reveals an association between high arterial calcification and low bone activity and ABD. The data analysis concluded that arterial calcification had an inverse correlation with osteoblastic surfaces. Later, in 2008, the same author 15

conducted a study to evaluate the interaction between bone activity, assessed by histomorphometric analysis, and the use of calcium-containing phosphate binders with the extent of abdominal aortic calcification and aortic stiffness, assessed by pulse wave velocity, in hemodialysis patients 35. In this study, not only biopsy proven ABD was associated with greater aortic stiffness independently of any other factor, but also, patients with ABD showed stronger association between calcium load and aortic calcification score and aortic stiffness. This indicates that the presence of ABD disease conferred a greater influence of calcium load to both aortic calcification and stiffening. A cohort study nested within a randomized controlled trial was performed to evaluate the association between bone remodeling disorders and progression of vascular calcification, more specifically, coronary artery calcification 36. Biochemcial parameters of bone activity were evaluated throughout the study and bone histomorphometry was assessed at baseline and after 1 year of follow-up. Coronary artery calcification was assessed by coronary multislice tomography at baseline and after 1 year of follow-up, with a score of 30 Agatston units of greater at baseline representing calcification and a change in the score of 15% or greater representing progression. Patients with a biopsy proven low turn-over disease at baseline who showed higher bone formation rate and osteoid volume at follow-up were associated with lower coronary artery calcification progression. Also, patients with lesser coronary artery calcification progression presented greater levels of bone specific alkaline phosphatase at follow-up. Low bone turn-over status was the only independent predictor of coronary artery calcification progression at the 12-month bone biopsy. A more recent study, involving 207 CKD stage 5 patients, evaluated the association between bone turn-over, assessed by histomorphometric analysis, and coronary artery 37 calcification, measured using multi-slice computed tomography. A negative association between activation frequency and coronary artery calcification score and 16

bone formation rate/bone surface and coronary artery calcification scores was found in patients with low turn-over. The recent recognition of the Wnt signal inhibitor sclerostin as an important regulator of bone metabolism has led to its study as a mediator in vascular calcification and it has already been shown that sclerostin is expressed in calcifying vasculature 38. A 2013 posthoc survival analysis showed that hemodialysis patients with levels of sclerostin above median, after adjustment for age and gender, had a significant greater survival 39. The authors explain this finding through the pre-existing hypothesis that the expression of wnt signaling inhibitors in calcifying vascular tissue may be a defensive response to limit the ossification and therefore limit the progression of the vascular calcification. Interestingly, a 2014 study with a cohort of 91 patients followed during a ten-year period showed that high sclerostin was associated with cardiovascular mortality, independently from diabetes and age 40. Some reasons for this discrepancy were postulated by the authors, including the younger cohort and lesser percentage of diabetic patients, as well as the adjustment for diabetes in the more recent study. These inconsistencies in the results reveal a need for further investigation on this matter, ideally with large scale studies. 17

Therapeutic approaches to adynamic bone disease Low calcium dialysate and calcium profiling Numerous investigators have suggested the use of low calcium dialysate in hemodialysis patients as a way to lower the risk of hypercalcaemia and excessive PTH suppression. A 6 months study with 60 patients with pre dialysis intact PTH<100 pg/ml equally distributed over low dialysate calcium (1.25mmol/l) and high dialysate calcium (1.75mmol/l) explored this hypothesis 41. The mean of total and ionized calcium was markedly increased in the high calcium dialysate at the end of dialysis. This was not observed in the low calcium dialysate group, where there were no differences in these parameters at baseline and end of dialysis. As expected, total and ionized calcium were significantly higher in the high calcium dialysate group when compared to the low calcium dialysate group throughout the study. Intact PTH, total alkaline phosphatase and bone alkaline phosphatase increased from baseline in the low calcium dialysate group. Moreover, all parameters reached higher levels in the low calcium dialysate when compared with the high calcium dialysate. These results suggest a benefic effect of low calcium dialysate on improving adynamic bone. A prospective trial involved 425 hemodialysis patients who with a follow up of 24 months explored the effects of lowering the calcium dialysate in bone histomorphometry and in the progression of the coronary artery calcification score 42. All patients had a PTH<300pg/ml and prior treatment with 1.5ml/L calcium dialysate. Patients receiving treatment with vitamin D in the preceding six months were excluded. Patients were randomized in to either 1.25ml/L or 1.75ml/L dialysate calcium. Bone biopsy was performed at baseline and after 24 months of follow-up. Bone histomorphometric analysis showed that bone formation rate, osteoblast surface/bone surface ratio as well as bone volume/tissue volume ratio increased in the group with the lowest calcium 18

dialysate, but not in the one with the highest. PTH levels were also significantly higher in the low calcium dialysate patients. These findings showed an improvement in bone formation and in bone turnover with the use of low calcium dialysate hemodialysis leading to an improvement of adynamic bone disease. Moreover, coronary artery calcification progression was significantly less pronounced in the group with the low calcium dialysate. Similar results regarding bone formation rate and PTH had already been reported in 2006 28, however the great strength of this more recent study is the large number of patients enrolled and evaluated. Low calcium dialysate is, however, associated with some harmful effects such as hemodynamic instability and cardiac rhythm disturbances. Calcium profiling with a profiled dialysate calcium concentration from 1.63mM/l at the beginning of the session to 1.93mM/l at the end was assessed in a multicenter, prospective, randomized trial 43. Patients in the calcium profiling group were compared with patients treated with low calcium dialysate (1.25mM/l) and with high calcium dialysate (2mM/l). Total amount of calcium given to the patient in the profiling group was higher than in the low calcium dialysate group, but lower than in the high calcium dialysate group. This higher amount of calcium was contra balanced by the absence of the systolic and diastolic arterial pressure decrease seen in the low calcium dialysate group. This results show that calcium profiling in hemofiltration is a way to guarantee cardiovascular stability during the hemodialysis session while reducing the risk of calcium overload. More studies need to be done to assess the effects of calcium profiling in bone parameters and, if possible, in bone histomorphometry. 19

Non-calcium phosphate binders Although used widely to maintain the serum phosphate within the target values, calciumcontaining phosphate binders are associated with a positive calcium balance, hypercalcaemia, parathyroid gland suppression, ABD and coronary and aortic calcification 44. With the advent of the non-calcium phosphate binders their effect on mortality, bone histology, vascular calcification, safety and effectiveness has been evaluated. Sevelamer hydrochloride Sevelamer hydrochloride is an aluminum and calcium free, non-absorbed polymer, with no potential for systemic accumulation. In a multicenter, prospective, randomized, noblinded study, 212 patients were randomized to either sevelamer hydrochloride or calcium carbonate 45. Sevelamer treated patients presented with significantly lower final and on-treatment phosphorus levels, although the proportion of patients on CKD stagespecific target of serum phosphorus was identical between the two groups. Sevelamer treated patients also presented a better PTH control and a final and on-treatment decreased serum calcium concentration. Adding to this, final and on-treatment average total cholesterol and LDL-cholesterol were significantly reduced in the sevelamer group. In this study the rate of all cause mortality, dialysis inception and the composite endpoint (all cause mortality and dialysis inception) was also significantly less frequent in the sevelamer treated patients. Other studies have also showed a decrease in mortality with sevelamer compared with calcium carbonate, although without statistical significance 46. A randomized clinical trial comparing sevelamer with calcium based phosphate binders in 200 hemodialysis patients aimed to compare the calcification of the coronary and aortic arteries 47.This study showed that the medium absolute calcium score increased significantly in the calcium treated group, but not in the sevelamer group (coronary 20

arteries 36.6 vs. 0 and aorta 75.1 vs. 0, respectively). The medium percent change in calcium score was also significantly greater with calcium than with sevelamer in both coronary and aortic arteries. Another study in which 129 patients new to hemodialysis were randomized to sevelamer or calcium-containing phosphate binders also showed a median increase in the coronary artery calcification score significantly greater in the calcium treated group. In the other hand, two more recent randomized trials showed no significant difference between sevelamer and calcium-containing phosphate binders in the coronary artery calcium score 48,49. More independent well designed studies are needed in order to definitely clarify this positive impact of sevelamer on vascular calcification progression. A 54 weeks randomized, open label study performed in 2008 in Portugal involving 119 hemodialysis patients with biopsies taken at baseline and at the end of the study 8 showed some changes in the histomorphometric parameters suggestive of increased bone turn-over with sevelamer when compared to calcium-containing phosphate binders. Although there was no difference between sevelamer or calcium-containing binders treated patients regarding change in bone disease classification. An increase in bone formation rate was showed in the sevelamer treated group compared to the calcium-containing binders patients, but did not reach statistical significance. Lanthanum carbonate A more recently developed non-calcium phosphate binder, lanthanum carbonate binds effectively to phosphate in the stomach, duodenum and jejunum. Lanthanum is primarily excreted by the liver and does not appear to cross the blood brain barrier 50. In 2013 a systematic review and meta-analysis showed that lanthanum carbonate lowered the serum phosphorus level with no difference observed between the lanthanum carbonate group and the calcium-containing phosphate binders group or the sevelamer 21

hydrochloride group, with lower levels of serum calcium and higher levels of bone specific alkaline phosphatase to those seen with calcium-containing-phosphatebinders 51. This study also showed that lanthanum carbonate has a lower rate intradialytic hypotension, cramps or myalgia and abdominal pain than previous phosphate binders. It has, however, a higher rate of vomiting when compared to calcium-containing phosphate binders. The differences in mortality of lanthanum carbonate versus calciumcontaining phosphate binders were assessed in a 2009 post-hoc survival analysis with 1354 patients in the course of 24 months 52. At follow up, mortality was higher in the calcium treated group (23.3%) than in the lanthanum carbonate treated group, although this results did not reach statistical significance. In the subgroup of patients aged >65 years, however, the results reached statistical significance, with a mortality of 39.3% in the calcium treated group and of 27.0% in the lanthanum carbonate treated patients. This shows the benefit of the lanthanum carbonate treatment in patients in patients with more than 65 years who are likely to carry the greatest burden of vascular calcification. Regarding vascular calcification, a pilot randomized control trial was conducted in 45 hemodialysis patients comparing distributed to either calcium carbonate or lanthanum carbonate 53. At 18 months there was significantly less aortic vascular calcification progression in the lanthanum carbonate group when compared to the calcium carbonate treated patients. There was a similar tendency, although without statistical significance, in the progression of vascular calcification in both left and right superficial femoral arteries. To assess the effects of lanthanum carbonate on bone a prospective open label study in Japanese patients on dialysis was performed with bone biopsies for histomorphometric analysis at baseline and after treatment 54. This study showed an improvement in osteoid condition toward normalization and also in the reabsorption condition toward normalization. After one year of treatment the diagnosis changed to a milder type disorder in all patients, including in 2 with ABD at baseline. After 3 years the 22

milder type classification was maintained in all biopsies that were conducted. A major limitation in this study in the low number of subjects, with only 14 patients at baseline, 9 patients completing the one year treatment and only 4 patients completing the 3 year treatment. New approaches Teriparatide Teriparatide (PTH 1-34) is an osteoanabolic agent in clinical use for the treatment of osteoporosis. The use of this agent in the treatment of ABD was hypothesized and studied in an open-label, prospective, 6-months, observational pilot study with 7 hemodialysis patients 55. Bone mineral density of the lumbar spine increased significantly after 6 months of therapy. Although there was also a tendency to the increase of bone mineral density of the femoral neck, these results were not statistically significant. Serum phosphate also showed a significant decrease when compared to pre-treatment values. Changes in coronary artery calcification did not reach statistical significance, with changes between -17 and +272% compared to baseline studies. The low number of participants in this study is a major limitation to this pilot-study. More studies are needed in order to fully understand the usefulness of this agent. Vitamin K (Menatetrenone) Vitamin K has an important role in regulating bone mineralization. The effects of vitamin K 2 on ABD were evaluated in a study enrolling 40 patients randomly divided in 2 groups, one treated with menatetrenone for a year and a control group untreated 56. Bone formation markers (intact osteocalcin and bone specific alkaline phosphatase) and bone reabsorption marker (NTx) increased in the Vitamin K 2 treated patients within a 12 23

months period. This results suggest that vitamin K can improve bone remodeling in hemodialysis patients with low PTH. Vitamin K 2 treated patients also showed a significant increase in PTH levels within 12 months of therapy (baseline: 50.5+-28.0; 12months: 91.1+-64.8). Serum osteoprotegerin levels, which have been associated with increased vascular calcification, showed a decrease after 12 months of treatment. However, no histomorphometric analysis was conducted, which is a fundamental step to assess the real effect of the therapy in bone remodeling. Anti-sclerostin antibody In order to determine if anti-sclerostin antibody is efficacious in preventing bone loss in animals with high and low PTH, Moe et al induced a slowly progressive model of CKD- MBD in rats which were then treated with anti-sclerostin antibody 57. The animals were sacrificed at 35 weeks. The anti-sclerostin antibody treatment increased trabecular bone volume/total bone volume and trabecular mineralization ratio in animals with low PTH, but not in the ones with high PTH. The study reported efficacy in improving bone properties when PTH levels are low with anti-sclerostin antibody treatment, however, this is the first study using an animal CKD model and, therefore, this results, although optimistic, need to be confirmed by other studies. 24

Discussion CKD is a global health problem with repercussions in the mineral homeostasis that are not only responsible for bone lesions, but also for systemic alterations, such as vascular calcification. The pathways that lead to these alterations are not restricted to changes in calcium and phosphate serum and tissue concentrations and circulating hormones, as confirmed by the recent finding of the inhibitory effect of sclerostin in bone formation and osteoblast activity. ABD prevalence is rising, this time not as a consequence of aluminum overload, but due to the generalized usage of calcium-containing phosphate binders and VDR agonists that lead to an increase in calcium load and PTH suppression. In ABD patients active vitamin D therapy should be avoided and non-calcium phosphate binders should be usesdin order to prevent further aggravation of the bone lesion. However, some studies have pointed out a benefit in terms of mortality in patients with low PTH when treated with VDR agonists. Selective VDR agonists have a lower risk of hypercalcaemia, hyperphosphatemia and elevated calcium-phosphate products levels and may present as a solution for this new dilemma. The association of ABD with peritoneal dialysis, older age, diabetes mellitus and the malnutrition-inflammation complex point out the multifactorial etiology of this disease and are a reminder of the need to further study ABD to fully understand its mechanisms so that we can successfully treat and prevent ABD. The gold-standard for the diagnosis of ABD is a bone biopsy with tetracycline labelling. However, this is an invasive, expensive and not widely available procedure that, in present days, cannot be satisfyingly replaced with biochemical markers. Nonetheless, 25

biochemical abnormalities are the most common indicators by which the diagnosis of MBD is made. Extreme values of PTH have a good diagnostic value for ABD and high turn-over disease, but in patients with intermediate values the diagnosis is not so clear. Newer markers, or combinations of the ones already available should be investigated in order to mitigate this diagnostic issue. Vascular calcification in a serious consequence of CKD-MBD and it has been associated with increased cardiovascular mortality and morbidity. The highest calcification scores have also been associated with lower PTH levels, which makes it especially important in ABD patients. The true association between sclerostin and vascular calcification has not yet been discovered, and more studies need to be conducted in order to fully understand it. Patients with ABD must have their calcium dialysate reduced in order to prevent excessive calcium load. This change translates into a bone histomorphometric improvement. As low calcium dialysate may have some hemodynamic consequences, an alternative with calcium dialysate profiling is being studied. As calcium-containing phosphate binders also contribute to an excessive calcium load, sevelamer and lanthanum carbonate are preferred in these patients, with benefic effects on mortality, vascular calcification and even bone histomorphometry. Novel approaches such as teriparatide, menatetrenone and the anti-sclerostin antibody are being proposed as treatment to ABD. However, the studies behind the results presented are few and in most cases lack a satisfying number of patients studied as well as histomorphometric analysis. Larger studies need to be conducted before definite conclusions can be taken on this matter. 26

Declaration of interest The authors report no conflicts of interest. The authors alone are responsible for the content and writing of the paper. 27

References 1. KDIGO clinical practice guideline for the diagnosis, evaluation, prevention, and treatment of Chronic Kidney Disease-Mineral and Bone Disorder (CKD-MBD). Kidney international. Supplement. 2009(113):S1-130. 2. de Oliveira RA, Barreto FC, Mendes M, et al. Peritoneal dialysis per se is a risk factor for sclerostin-associated adynamic bone disease. Kidney international. 2014. 3. Cejka D, Herberth J, Branscum AJ, et al. Sclerostin and Dickkopf-1 in renal osteodystrophy. Clinical journal of the American Society of Nephrology : CJASN. 2011;6(4):877-882. 4. Block GA, Klassen PS, Lazarus JM, Ofsthun N, Lowrie EG, Chertow GM. Mineral metabolism, mortality, and morbidity in maintenance hemodialysis. Journal of the American Society of Nephrology : JASN. 2004;15(8):2208-2218. 5. Moe S, Drueke T, Cunningham J, et al. Definition, evaluation, and classification of renal osteodystrophy: a position statement from Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO). Kidney international. 2006;69(11):1945-1953. 6. Ott SM. Bone histomorphometry in renal osteodystrophy. Seminars in nephrology. 2009;29(2):122-132. 7. Frazao JM, Martins P. Adynamic bone disease: clinical and therapeutic implications. Current opinion in nephrology and hypertension. 2009;18(4):303-307. 8. Ferreira A, Frazao JM, Monier-Faugere MC, et al. Effects of sevelamer hydrochloride and calcium carbonate on renal osteodystrophy in hemodialysis 28

patients. Journal of the American Society of Nephrology : JASN. 2008;19(2):405-412. 9. Nebeker HG, Coburn JW. Aluminum and renal osteodystrophy. Annual review of medicine. 1986;37:79-95. 10. Ballanti P, Wedard BM, Bonucci E. Frequency of adynamic bone disease and aluminum storage in Italian uraemic patients--retrospective analysis of 1429 iliac crest biopsies. Nephrology, dialysis, transplantation : official publication of the European Dialysis and Transplant Association - European Renal Association. 1996;11(4):663-667. 11. Brandenburg VM, Floege J. Adynamic bone disease--bone and beyond. NDT Plus. 2008;1(3):135-147. 12. Malberti F. Hyperphosphataemia: treatment options. Drugs. 2013;73(7):673-688. 13. Malluche HH, Mawad H, Monier-Faugere MC. The importance of bone health in end-stage renal disease: out of the frying pan, into the fire? Nephrology, dialysis, transplantation : official publication of the European Dialysis and Transplant Association - European Renal Association. 2004;19 Suppl 1:i9-13. 14. Kurz P, Monier-Faugere MC, Bognar B, et al. Evidence for abnormal calcium homeostasis in patients with adynamic bone disease. Kidney international. 1994;46(3):855-861. 15. Andress DL. Adynamic bone in patients with chronic kidney disease. Kidney international. 2008;73(12):1345-1354. 16. Bover J, Egido J, Fernandez-Giraldez E, et al. Vitamin D, vitamin D receptor and the importance of its activation in patients with chronic kidney disease. Nefrologia : publicacion oficial de la Sociedad Espanola Nefrologia. 2015;35(1):28-41. 17. Cozzolino M, Brancaccio D, Cannella G, et al. VDRA therapy is associated with improved survival in dialysis patients with serum intact PTH </= 150 pg/ml: 29

results of the Italian FARO Survey. Nephrology, dialysis, transplantation : official publication of the European Dialysis and Transplant Association - European Renal Association. 2012;27(9):3588-3594. 18. Alikhani M, Alikhani Z, Boyd C, et al. Advanced glycation end products stimulate osteoblast apoptosis via the MAP kinase and cytosolic apoptotic pathways. Bone. 2007;40(2):345-353. 19. Malluche HH, Mawad HW, Monier-Faugere MC. Renal osteodystrophy in the first decade of the new millennium: analysis of 630 bone biopsies in black and white patients. Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research. 2011;26(6):1368-1376. 20. Dukkipati R, Kovesdy CP, Colman S, et al. Association of relatively low serum parathyroid hormone with malnutrition-inflammation complex and survival in maintenance hemodialysis patients. Journal of renal nutrition : the official journal of the Council on Renal Nutrition of the National Kidney Foundation. 2010;20(4):243-254. 21. Kalantar-Zadeh K, Shah A, Duong U, Hechter RC, Dukkipati R, Kovesdy CP. Kidney bone disease and mortality in CKD: revisiting the role of vitamin D, calcimimetics, alkaline phosphatase, and minerals. Kidney international. Supplement. 2010(117):S10-21. 22. Barreto FC, Barreto DV, Moyses RM, et al. K/DOQI-recommended intact PTH levels do not prevent low-turnover bone disease in hemodialysis patients. Kidney international. 2008;73(6):771-777. 23. Souberbielle JC, Roth H, Fouque DP. Parathyroid hormone measurement in CKD. Kidney international. 2010;77(2):93-100. 30

24. Langub MC, Monier-Faugere MC, Wang G, Williams JP, Koszewski NJ, Malluche HH. Administration of PTH-(7-84) antagonizes the effects of PTH-(1-84) on bone in rats with moderate renal failure. Endocrinology. 2003;144(4):1135-1138. 25. Zidehsarai MP, Moe SM. Review article: Chronic kidney disease-mineral bone disorder: have we got the assays right? Nephrology (Carlton, Vic.). 2009;14(4):374-382. 26. Monier-Faugere MC, Geng Z, Mawad H, et al. Improved assessment of bone turnover by the PTH-(1-84)/large C-PTH fragments ratio in ESRD patients. Kidney international. 2001;60(4):1460-1468. 27. Coen G, Bonucci E, Ballanti P, et al. PTH 1-84 and PTH "7-84" in the noninvasive diagnosis of renal bone disease. American journal of kidney diseases : the official journal of the National Kidney Foundation. 2002;40(2):348-354. 28. Haris A, Sherrard DJ, Hercz G. Reversal of adynamic bone disease by lowering of dialysate calcium. Kidney international. 2006;70(5):931-937. 29. Atsumi K, Kushida K, Yamazaki K, Shimizu S, Ohmura A, Inoue T. Risk factors for vertebral fractures in renal osteodystrophy. American journal of kidney diseases : the official journal of the National Kidney Foundation. 1999;33(2):287-293. 30. Coco M, Rush H. Increased incidence of hip fractures in dialysis patients with low serum parathyroid hormone. American journal of kidney diseases : the official journal of the National Kidney Foundation. 2000;36(6):1115-1121. 31. Giachelli CM, Jono S, Shioi A, Nishizawa Y, Mori K, Morii H. Vascular calcification and inorganic phosphate. American journal of kidney diseases : the official journal of the National Kidney Foundation. 2001;38(4 Suppl 1):S34-37. 31