Kiehl EL, 1,2 Parker AM, 1 Matar RM, 2 Gottbrecht M, 1 Johansen MC, 1 Adams MP, 1 Griffiths LA, 2 Bidwell KL, 1 Menon V, 2 Enfield KB, 1 Gimple LW 1

Similar documents
Supplementary Online Content

DECLARATION OF CONFLICT OF INTEREST. Research grants: Sanofi-Aventis

Post-Resuscitation Care. Prof. Wilhelm Behringer Center of Emergency Medicine University of Jena

Key statistics from the National Cardiac Arrest Audit: Paediatric arrests April 2012 to March 2017

Out-of-hospital Cardiac Arrest. Franz R. Eberli MD, FESC, FAHA Cardiology Triemli Hospital Zurich, Switzerland

Lesson learnt from big trials. Sung Phil Chung, MD Gangnam Severance Hospital, Yonsei Univ.

In-hospital Care of the Post-Cardiac Arrest Patient. David A. Pearson, MD, FACEP, FAAEM Associate Program Director Department of Emergency Medicine

ECLS: A new frontier for refractory V.Fib and pulseless VT

Epinephrine Cardiovascular Emergencies Symposium 2018

CPR What Works, What Doesn t

Outcomes of Therapeutic Hypothermia in Cardiac Arrest. Saad Mohammed Shariff, MBBS Aravind Herle, MD, FACC

The ARREST Trial: Amiodarone for Resuscitation After Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest Due to Ventricular Fibrillation

WORKSHEET for Evidence-Based Review of Science for Veterinary CPCR

Update on Sudden Cardiac Death and Resuscitation

Advanced Resuscitation - Adult

Hypothermia Post Cardiac Arrest: An Update

Post-Arrest Care: Beyond Hypothermia

Update on Sudden Cardiac Death and Resuscitation

Advanced Resuscitation - Adolescent

CORONARY ANGIOGRAPHY AND NEUROLOGICALLY INTACT SURVIVAL IN OUT-OF- HOSPITAL CARDIAC ARREST PATIENTS WITH RETURN OF SPONTANEOUS CIRCULATION

Code Talkers NONE. Disclosures Brady & Slovis. Lay Provider Care. Cardiac Arrest 2017 Resuscitation & Post-arrest Management

Cardiac Arrest Registry Database Office of the Medical Director

Serum neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin levels predict the neurological outcomes of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest victims

Enhancing 5 th Chain TTM after Cardiac Arrest

Coronary Angiography after Cardiac Arrest without ST-Segment Elevation: the COACT trial

ECG Changes in Patients Treated with Mild Hypothermia after Cardio-pulmonary Resuscitation for Out-of-hospital Cardiac Arrest

Cardiac Arrest Registry Database Office of the Medical Director

Advanced Resuscitation - Child

Is the Statistical Deck Stacked in Observational Resuscitation Studies?

PROBLEM: Shock refractory VF/pVT BACKGROUND: Both in 2015 CoSTR. Amiodarone favoured.

Prof Gavin Perkins Co-Chair ILCOR

Management of Post Cardiac Arrest Syndrome

Department of Surgery, Division of Cardiothoracic Surgery

Supplementary Appendix

Emergency Cardiac Care Guidelines 2015

Targeted temperature management after post-anoxic brain insult: where do we stand?

Refractory cardiac arrest

Disclosures. Extra-Corporeal Membrane Oxygenation During Cardio- Pulmonary Resuscitation ECPR April 22, 2016 ECG. Case. Case. Case Summary 4/22/2016

Post Cardiac Arrest Care 2015 American Heart Association Guideline Update for CPR and Emergency Cardiovascular Care

Stayin Alive: Pediatric Advanced Life Support (PALS) Updated Guidelines

Overview and Latest Research on Out of Hospital Cardiac Arrest

Post-Cardiac Arrest Syndrome. MICU Lecture Series

Hypothermia After Cardiac Arrest: Where Are We Now?

Management of Cardiac Arrest Based on : 2010 American Heart Association Guidelines

Neuroprognostication after cardiac arrest

WORKSHEET for Evidence-Based Review of Science for Veterinary CPCR

New ACLS/Post Arrest Guidelines: For Everyone? Laurie Morrison, Li Ka Shing, Knowledge Institute, St Michael s Hospital, University of Toronto

The American Heart Association estimates that

Cardiac Arrest January 2017 CPR /3/ Day to Survival Propensity Matched

Samphant Ponvilawan Bumrungrad International

University of Washington. From the SelectedWorks of Kent M Koprowicz

Therapeutic hypothermia following cardiac arrest

Hypothermia: The Science and Recommendations (In-hospital and Out)

The Evidence Base. Stephan A. Mayer, MD. Columbia University New York, NY

Netherlands Heart Journal High survival rate of 43% in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest patients in an optimized chain of survival.

WORKSHEET for Evidence-Based Review of Science for Veterinary CPCR

Disclosures. Pediatrician Financial: none Volunteer :

2016 Top Papers in Critical Care

Patient Case. Post cardiac arrest pathophysiology 10/19/2017. Disclosure. Objectives. Patient Case-TM

5 Key EMS Articles for 2012

Prehospital Post Arrest Care AHA Strive to Revive 2017 November 3, 2017

Developments in Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation Guidelines

Impact of early coronary angiography

Tina Yoo, PharmD Clinical Pharmacist Alameda Health System Highland Hospital

2015 AHA Guidelines: Pediatric Updates

Objectives. Design: Setting &Patients: Patients. Measurements and Main Results: Common. Adverse events VS Mortality

ACLS AND MORE. Ryan Clark D.O. Medical Education Fellow University of Massachusetts Medical School Baystate Medical Center

Major Points. The ED-ICU Interface. Chain of Survival. It usually starts here

But unfortunately, the first sign of cardiovascular disease is often the last. Chest-Compression-Only Resuscitation Gordon A.

Curricullum Vitae. Dr. Isman Firdaus, SpJP (K), FIHA

Changing Demographics in Death After Devastating Brain Injury

EXTRACORPOREAL LIFE SUPPORT FOR REFRACTORY IN-HOSPITAL AND OUT-OF-HOSPITAL CARDIAC ARREST: ARE THE OUTCOMES REALLY DIFFERENT? A 10-YEAR EXPERIENCE

Rowan County EMS. I m p r o v i n g C a r d i a c A r r e s t S u r v i v a l. Christopher Warr NREMT-P Lieutenant.

In the past decade, two large randomized

Post-Resuscitation Care: Optimizing & Improving Outcomes after Cardiac Arrest. Objectives: U.S. stats

Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest In North Carolina. James G. Jollis, MD, FACC Co-Medical Director Regional Approach to Cardiovascular Emergencies

Regionalization of Post-Cardiac Arrest Care

Incidence, Etiology, and Implications of Shock in Therapeutic Hypothermia

18% Survival from In-Hospital Cardiac Arrest Ways we can do better! National Teaching Institute Denver, CO Class Code: 149 A

Disclosure. Co-investigators 1/23/2015

What is the op3mal electrical therapy for refractory ventricular fibrilla3on?

RACE CARS: Hospital Response. David A. Pearson, MD Department of Emergency Medicine Carolinas Medical Center February 23, 2012

THE EVIDENCED BASED 2015 CPR GUIDELINES

Science Behind Resuscitation. Vic Parwani, MD ED Medical Director CarolinaEast Health System August 6 th, 2013

IN HOSPITAL CARDIAC ARREST AND SEPSIS

Most Important EMS Articles EAGLES 2017

THE FOLLOWING QUESTIONS RELATE TO THE RESUSCITATION COUNCIL (UK) RESUSCITATION GUIDELINES 2005

Most Important EMS Articles EAGLES 2017

Manual Defibrillation. CPR AGE: 18 years LOA: Altered HR: N/A RR: N/A SBP: N/A Other: N/A

Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest In North Carolina. Christopher Granger, M.D. Director, Duke CCU

E-CPR National Trends & Local Plans

E-CPR National Trends & Local Plans

Bone Voyage Administrating ALS Medications via the Intra- Osseous Route. Jon Jui MD, MPH

2015 Interim Training Materials

State of the art lecture: 21st Century Post resuscitation management

Out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: incidence, process of care, and outcomes in an urban city, Korea

Case: 65 year old post-cardiac arrest patient with myoclonus

ACLS/ACS Updates 2015

Initial Rhythms and Outcomes for In-Hospital Cardiac Arrest in Kenya

SHOCKING UPDATES IN ACUTE CARDIAC LIFE SUPPORT (ACLS)

Transcription:

C-GRApH: A Validated Scoring System For The Early Risk Stratification Of Neurologic Outcomes After Out-of-hospital Cardiac Arrest Treated With Therapeutic Hypothermia Kiehl EL, 1,2 Parker AM, 1 Matar RM, 2 Gottbrecht M, 1 Johansen MC, 1 Adams MP, 1 Griffiths LA, 2 Bidwell KL, 1 Menon V, 2 Enfield KB, 1 Gimple LW 1 University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA, USA; 1 Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, OH, USA; 2

Background Estimated 326,000 out-of-hospital cardiac arrests (OHCA) in US in 2015 Survival to hospital discharge: 10% Neurologic injury is the leading cause of death (67%) and results in significant disability in survivors Therapeutic hypothermia (TH)/targeted temperature management (TTM) improves neurologic outcomes after OHCA Ventricular tachycardia/fibrillation (class I): 20% absolute risk reduction Pulseless electrical activity/asystole (class IIb): 5% relative risk reduction

Background Early prognosis after OHCA is problematic due to decreased specificity of prior gold-standard testing in the TH/TTM population Current consensus recommendation: delay prognosis >72 hours Given high morbidity/mortality even with TH/TTM, ethical (prolonged suffering for patients/families) and economic incentives exist for reliable early risk stratification Multiple past scoring systems (e.g. OHCA, 5-R) developed to predict neurologic outcomes after OHCA at hospital presentation Not validated in TH/TTM population Heavily dependent on unreliable timing variables (e.g. time from arrest to return of spontaneous circulation)

Study Goals To develop and validate a scoring system that effectively stratifies neurologic outcomes following out-of-hospital cardiac arrest in the TH/TTM population that: 1. Uses only objective data available at initial hospital presentation 2. Eliminates the use of unreliable timing variables 3. Is applicable to OHCA patients regardless of presenting rhythm 4. Can be easily calculated at the bedside by various sub-specialty providers that participate in post-ohca care

Development Cohort Retrospective review of the prospectively-acquired, consecutive University of Virginia CCU OHCA database from 2008-2012 (n = 122) Inclusion criteria Adult (age 18), resuscitated, non-traumatic OHCA Intention to treat with TH/TTM at 32-34 o C for 24 hours Primary outcome: favorable neurologic outcome at hospital discharge Definition: Glasgow-Pittsburgh cerebral performance category (CPC) 1-2 CPC 1-2: Mild-moderate cerebral disability; able to perform ADLs independently CPC 3: Severe cerebral disability; Dependent on others for ADLs CPC 4: Vegetative state CPC 5: Death Retrospective assignment by consensus of blinded neurologists based on documented physical exam findings and consultation notes

Development Cohort Patient data at hospital presentation (demographics, pre-ohca diagnoses, arrest characteristics, laboratory results) were compared between favorable (CPC 1-2) and poor (CPC 3-5) neurologic outcome groups Uni-variable logistic regression then performed with variables satisfying an a priori ρ<0.1 cutoff between outcome groups retained for multi-variable analysis (cut points identified for continuous variables) Stepwise multi-variable logistic regression then performed to eliminate variable co-dependence and create a composite scoring system with maximized c-statistic

Development Cohort Characteristics CPC 1-2 (n = 33) CPC 3-5 (n = 89) P-value Age 52.6 ± 18.3 62.2 ± 15.1 0.004 Sex (male) 73% 66% 0.57 Pre-OHCA coronary artery disease 21% 47% 0.023 Congestive heart failure 15% 31% 0.069 Diabetes mellitus 18% 38% 0.021 COPD 3% 21% 0.052 Stage III chronic kidney disease 6% 17% 0.271 Ventricular tachycardia/fibrillation 97% 56% <0.001 Time to CPR (min) 2.5 ± 3.8 4.1 ± 7.2 0.24 Time to EMS (min) 7.7 ± 5.9 9.8 ± 9.5 0.31 Time to ROSC (min) 20.6 ± 11.9 34.8 ± 17.5 <0.001 Arterial ph 7.20 ± 0.12 7.14 ± 0.16 0.021 Lactic acid (mmol/l) 5.6 ± 3.1 7.2 ± 3.6 0.045 Troponin I (ng/ml) 0.71 ± 2.50 2.5 ± 7.95 0.227 Blood Glucose (mg/dl) 243 ± 86 308 ± 125 0.008

C-GRApH Variables (1 point each, equally weighted) C: Coronary artery disease (CAD), pre-arrest Definition: history of prior MI, CABG, PCI, or obstructive lesion >50% on cardiac catheterization (not chart diagnosis alone) NOT included if CAD diagnosed during OHCA hospitalization G: Glucose (blood) > 200 mg/dl Fingerstick, blood gas, or metabolic panel R: Rhythm of arrest NOT ventricular tachycardia (VT) or fibrillation (VF) If AED only rhythm discriminator, shockable = VT/VF A: Age > 45 years ph: ph (arterial) < 7.0 Scoring system ranging from 0 to 5 with higher score predictive of worse neurologic outcome C-statistic:.818 (95% CI.74-.90, ρ<0.001)

Validation Cohort Combination of internal and external cohorts (n = 344) Internal (n= 72) Consecutive new, prospective cohort from University of Virginia OHCA database from 2013-4 External (n = 272) Consecutive retrospective review of prospectively-acquired Cleveland Clinic Foundation OHCA database from 2012-4 CCU, MICU, NNICU, SICU settings Main academic center and satellite community hospitals CPC scores assigned prospectively Other ICU 42% CCU 58% Community 39% Academic 61%

Characteristics of Development vs. Validation Cohorts Development Cohort (n = 122) Validation Cohort (n = 344) P Value Survival 42 (34%) 110 (32%) 0.625 CPC 3.8 (1.7) 4 (1.5) 0.115 C-GRApH Score 2.4 (1.0) 2.8 (1.1) 0.002 Death/Withdrawal <72 hrs 43 (35%) 85 (25%) 0.034 Witnessed Arrest 104 (85%) 265 (77%) 0.038 Bystander CPR 70 (57%) 162 (47%) 0.051 Time to ROSC (min) 30.3 (17.2) 26.7 (17.3) 0.083 Male Gender 83 (68%) 194 (56%) 0.025 CAD 49 (40%) 117 (34%) 0.226 Glucose (mg/dl) 290 (119) 268 (127) 0.089 VT/VF 82 (67%) 129 (38%) <0.001 Age 59.7 (15.5) 62.3 (15.2) 0.110 Arterial ph 7.17 (0.15) 7.15 (0.19) 0.165

Receiver Operating Characteristic

Neurologic Outcomes Stratified by C-GRApH Score

Neurologic Outcomes by C-GRApH Score in Development, Validation, and Composite Cohorts Favorable Neurologic Outcome by C-GRApH Score Development (n = 122) Validation (n = 344) Composite (n = 466) 100% Favorable Neurologic Outcome 90% 80% 70% 60% 50% 40% 30% 20% 10% 0% N = 10 N = 50 N = 130 N = 177 N = 85 N = 14 0 1 2 3 4 5 C-GRApH Score

Study Limitations & Future Directions Study Limitations Partially retrospective Small sample sizes at score extremes Future Directions Fully prospective, multi-site validation Long-term follow-up of neurologic outcomes and quality of life assessment

Conclusions C-GRApH provides excellent stratification of neurologic outcomes following OHCA in patients treated with TH/TTM using objective data available at hospital presentation Nearly identical ROC (c-statistic 0.82, p<0.001) and stratification by score in both the development and validation cohorts Applicable to varied ICU and hospital settings Simple pneumonic that is easy to use Provides early objective outcome data to aid in family discussions Identifies a patient cohort (score 4) that derives little to no benefit from TH/TTM, aggressive intervention, and ICU care following OHCA

Questions?