Matthew Mei, M.D. Assistant t Professor City of Hope Comprehensive Cancer Center

Similar documents
Treatment of APL. M a tth e w M e i, M.D. A s s is ta n t P ro fe s s o r C ity o f H o p e C o m p re h e n s iv e C a n c e r C e n te r

Objectives. I do not have anything to disclose.

Progress in the treatment of acute promyelocytic leukemia. Lionel Adès, MD PhD Hopital Saint Louis, Paris Diderot University

Acute promyelocytic leukemia

Prise en Charge des LAM-3. Hervé Dombret Hôpital Saint-Louis Institut Universitaire d Hématologie Université Paris Diderot

Which is the best treatment for relapsed APL?

Belgium recommendations for the management of acute promyelocytic leukaemia

MOLECULAR AND CLINICAL ONCOLOGY 3: , 2015

Current standard treatment of adult acute promyelocytic leukaemia

Clinical commissioning policy statement: Arsenic trioxide for the treatment of high risk acute promyelocytic leukaemia (all ages)

Improvements with Risk-adapted PETHEMA Protocols in New Diagnosed Acute Promyelocytic Leukemia

Anand P. Jillella, MD; FACP Professor, Hematology and Medical Oncology Associate Director for Community Affairs and Outreach Winship Cancer Institute

Therapy-related MDS/AML with KMT2A (MLL) Rearrangement Following Therapy for APL Case 0328

Acute Promyelocytic Leukemia: Current Management with Emphasis on Prevention of Induction Mortality

PETHEMA; 2 HOVON; 3 PLAG and 4 GATLA Groups.

7th International Symposium on Acute Promyelocytic Leukemia, Rome, September 24 27, Eva Lengfelder

Single Technology Appraisal (STA) Arsenic trioxide for treating acute promyelocytic leukaemia

A Canadian consensus on the management of newly diagnosed and relapsed acute promyelocytic leukemia in adults

STATUS OF EARLY MORTALITY IN NEWLY DIAGNOSED CASES OF ACUTE PROMYELOCYTIC LEUKAEMIA (APL) IN BSMMU HOSPITAL

All patients with FLT3 mutant AML should receive midostaurin-based induction therapy. Not so fast!

The Role of ATRA Followed by Chemotherapy in the Treatment of Acute Promyelocytic Leukemia

perc deliberated upon: a pcodr systematic review other literature in the Clinical Guidance Report providing clinical context

Correspondence should be addressed to Chen Xue-Liang; chenxl and Hou Ming; houming

Thrombohemorrhagic disorders in APL: the unsolved issue

Acute Promyelocytic Leukemia

Risk-adapted therapy of AML in younger adults. Sergio Amadori Tor Vergata University Hospital Rome

CREDIT DESIGNATION STATEMENT

Remission induction in acute myeloid leukemia

Characteristics and Outcome of Therapy-Related Acute Promyelocytic Leukemia After Different Front-line Therapies

Management of Relapsed APL

ELIGIBILITY: Newly diagnosed acute promyelocytic leukemia (APL) with high risk (WBC more than 10 x 10 9 /L)

5/21/2018. Disclosures. Objectives. Normal blood cells production. Bone marrow failure syndromes. Story of DNA

Acute Promyelocytic Leukemia

Adult ALL: NILG experience

Acute myeloid leukemia. M. Kaźmierczak 2016

Breakthroughs in the treatment of APL: role of arsenic in newlydiagnosed

Dr Shankara Paneesha. ASH Highlights Department of Haematology & Stem cell Transplantation

ELIGIBILITY: Newly diagnosed acute promyelocytic leukemia (APL) with low to intermediate risk (WBC less than 10 x 10 9 /L)

Disclosures of Massimo Breccia

Advances in the Treatment of APL in Children SLOP Vina del Mar April 2014

Tamibarotene As Maintenance Therapy for Acute Promyelocytic Leukemia: Results From a Randomized Controlled Trial

All-trans retinoic acid in acute promyelocytic leukemia: long-term outcome and prognostic factor analysis from the North American Intergroup protocol

Acute Promyelocytic Leukemia Improving Survival in the Most Curable Leukemia; A Georgia and South Carolina Initiative.

AML Emerging Treatment Strategies

Zhang et al. BMC Cancer (2018) 18:374 /s

Ten-year Experience on Acute Promyelocytic Leukemia at Inha University Hospital

Who should get what for upfront therapy for MCL? Kami Maddocks, MD The James Cancer Hospital The Ohio State University

Background CPX-351. Lancet J, et al. J Clin Oncol. 2017;35(suppl): Abstract 7035.

AML in elderly. D.Selleslag AZ Sint-Jan Brugge, Belgium 14 December 2013

Analysis of factors affecting hemorrhagic diathesis and overall survival in patients with acute promyelocytic leukemia

Treatment concepts of acute promyelocytic leukemia

Influence of initiation time and white blood cell count on the efficacy of cytotoxic agents in acute promyelocytic leukemia during induction treatment

Molecularly Targeted Therapies - Strategies of the AMLSG

New Targets and Treatments for Follicular Lymphoma

The case for maintenance rituximab in FL

[ NASDAQ: MEIP ] Analyst & Investor Event December 8, 2014

AIH, Marseille 30/09/06

Arsenic Trioxide for Acute Promyelocytic Leukemia

Inotuzumab Ozogamicin in ALL. Hagop Kantarjian M.D. May 2016 Bologna, Italy

NCCP Chemotherapy Regimen. Tretinoin (ATRA)/IDArubicin (PETHEMA AIDA) Induction Therapy: High Risk

To Maintain or Not to Maintain? Immunomodulators vs PIs Yes: Proteasome Inhibitors

Relapsing APL. Pierre Fenaux Hôpital St Louis, Paris 7 University French Belgian Swiss APL group DES

Philadelphia-positive Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia

Long-term outcome of acute promyelocytic leukemia treated with all-trans-retinoic acid, arsenic trioxide, and gemtuzumab

Mantle Cell Lymphoma. A schizophrenic disease

MS.4/ Acute Leukemia: AML. Abdallah Al Abbadi.MD.FRCP.FRCPath Feras Fararjeh MD

Articles. Funding Cancer Research UK.

New concepts in the management of elderly patients with AML

Multiple Myeloma Updates 2007

Manufacturer: Wyeth Pharmaceuticals Inc., a subsidiary of Pfizer Inc.

Frontline Induc.on Therapy in 2017 Alan K Burne+

Acute leukemia. Ibrahim Aldoss, MD Assistant Professor, City of Hope Hematology and Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation

Acute Myeloid Leukemia: State of the Art in 2018

Acute Promyelocytic Leukemia: A History over 60 Years From the Most Malignant to the most Curable Form of Acute Leukemia

Can ALL be managed without chemotherapy/transplant? (Position: NO) D.Hoelzer J.W.Goethe University Frankfurt

AML:Transplant or ChemoTherapy?

Meet-the-Expert: AML Treating older patients with AML

Summary. Olga Zając, Katarzyna Derwich, Katarzyna Stefankiewicz, Jacek Wachowiak. Rep Pract Oncol Radiother, 2007; 12(5):

Acute Myeloid Leukemia

Abstract 861. Stein AS, Topp MS, Kantarjian H, Gökbuget N, Bargou R, Litzow M, Rambaldi A, Ribera J-M, Zhang A, Zimmerman Z, Forman SJ

Disclosure. Study was sponsored by Karyopharm Therapeutics No financial relationships to disclose Other disclosures:

Improving Response to Treatment in CLL with the Addition of Rituximab and Alemtuzumab to Chemoimmunotherapy

Standard of care for patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma who are not eligible for a transplant

PET-adapted therapies in the management of younger patients (age 60) with classical Hodgkin lymphoma

Bendamustine is Effective Therapy in Patients with Rituximab-Refractory, Indolent B-Cell Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma

Comparing Arsenic Trioxide with Realgar-Indigo naturalis formula in children with Acute Promyelocy=c Leukemia:

The case against maintenance rituximab in Follicular lymphoma. Jonathan W. Friedberg M.D., M.M.Sc.

A Prospective Study on the Effectiveness of Arsenic Trioxide (ATO) in Remission Induction of Acute Promyelocytic Leukemia (APL)

Matthew Ulrickson, MD Banner MD Anderson Cancer Center September 12, 2017

RADIOIMMUNOTHERAPY FOR TREATMENT OF NON- HODGKIN S LYMPHOMA

REV BRAS HEMATOL HEMOTER. 2014;36(1): Revista Brasileira de Hematologia e Hemoterapia. Brazilian Journal of Hematology and Hemotherapy

Treatment of elderly multiple myeloma patients

CLINICAL STUDY REPORT SYNOPSIS

MULTIPLE MYELOMA AFTER AGE OF 80 YEARS

Tretinoin - ATRA (All Trans Retinoic Acid)

VYXEOS : CHEMOTHERAPY LIPOSOME INJECTION FOR ACUTE MYELOID LEUKEMIA

Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML) Malignant Clone Disorder of Immature Hematopoietic Cells

Induction Therapy & Stem Cell Transplantation for Myeloma

Curing Myeloma So Close and Yet So Far! Luciano J. Costa, MD, PhD Associate Professor of Medicine University of Alabama at Birmingham

Transcription:

Treatment of APL Matthew Mei, M.D. Assistant t Professor City of Hope Comprehensive Cancer Center

Objectives 1. Urgency of early recognition and treatment 2. Treatment based on risk stratification 3. Monitoring for relapse 4. Treatment of relapse 5. Long-term toxicities

Acute Promyelocytic Leukemia Distinguishing g g Features 10-15% of adult AML Leukopenia L k i (85%) Complex coagulopathy t(15;17) chrom translocation Sensitivityy to anthracyclines y PML-RAR fusion transcript Differentiation with retinoic acid Apoptosis with arsenic trioxide

Bleeding in APL Oral mucosal bleeding Subcutaneous bleeding Retinal hemorrhages Intracerebral hemorrhage

Early Death Rate in APL Population-Based Studies Study N ED Jeddi 41 16% Lehmann 99 31% Alizadeh 137 14% McClellan 70 26% Park 1,400 18% Jeddi et al. Hematology, 2008; Lehmann et al. Leukemia, 2010; Alizadeh et al. ASH, 2009; McClellan et al. Haematologica, 2012; Park et al. Blood, 2011

Molecular Basis of Leukemogenesis in APL RAR fuses to PML Increased affinity for nuclear co-repressor protein complex (N-coR) Histone deacetylase alters chromatin conformation inhibiting transcription Retinoic i acid (RA) induces release of N-coR permitting transcription RAR RARE msin3 N-CoR HD RA RAR RARE msin3 N-CoR HD PML PML Grignani et al. Nature, 1998

Milestones in the Development of Curative Strategies in APL Initial Description, Highly Fatal Daunorubicin ATRA ATRA + Chemo Arsenic Highly Curable ATRA + Arsenic 1957 1973 1985 1990 s 1997 2000 s 2009 DF FS 1.0 0.8 0.6 0.4 0.2 1.0 ECOG Data 0.8 Pre-ATRA era 1973-1989 1989 0.6 0.4 0.0 0 5 10 15 20 Years Tallman et al. Blood, 2002 OS APL2000 WBC < 10,000/ L WBC 10-50,000/ L WBC > 50,000/ L 0.2 P =.14 0.0 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 Years Kelaidi et al. J Clin Oncol, 2009

All-trans Retinoic Acid Natural vitamin A derivative Induces leukemic promyelocytes to differentiate t in vitro Induces CR in almost all pts with APL as single agent No imposition of marrow aplasia At diagnosis Day 12 Day 37

Arsenic Trioxide Single most active agent in APL Single-agent tcr rate very high hin frontline and relapsed setting Dual mechanism (differentiation at lower dose, apoptosis at higher dose) Biggest concerns are QTc prolongation and elevated LFTs

Molecular Response to Arsenic Trioxide in Relapsed APL: US Multicenter Study with MR ( %) Pa atients 90% 100 90 86% 80 70 60 48% 50 40 30 20 10 0 Baseline Induction Consolidation Maintenance N=29 Soignet et al. J Clin Oncol, 2001

Prevention of Early Death in APL ATRA at first suspicion (based on clinical hx and review of peripheral smear), before marrow and before diagnosis is confirmed Frequent platelet transfusions to > 50,000/ L000/ L Cryoprecipitate to maintain fibrinogen > 150 mg/dl No routine heparin No routine antifibrinolytics No leukopheresis Rodeghiero et al. Blood, 1990; Tallman et al. Leukemia Res, 2004; Sanz et al. Blood, 2008

Risk Stratification Treatment is primarily based on risk stratification. Risk stratification is easy Initial WBC > 10 = high risk (probably needs some chemotherapy besides just ATRA + ATO) Initial WBC 10 = standard risk (induce with ATRA + ATO)

Caveats for Induction in APL Differentiation Syndrome steroid prophylaxis built into the APL 0406 regimen, try to not hold medication if possible. Do NOT do marrow on Day 14 or Day 21! Initial rise in WBC with rising neutrophils represents differentiation of the malignant clone, not true count recovery

APL 0406 Study Inclusion Criteria Newly diagnosed APL Age 18-70 years WBC 10 x 10 9 /L WHO performance status 2 Trial designed to assess a non-inferiority margin difference between the group proportions of 5%

APL0406 Study: Treatment ATO arm Induction ATO ATR Consolidation ATO ATO ATO ATO 4 weeks on / 4 weeks off 2 weeks on / 2 weeks off Estey et al, Blood 2006 R Induction Consolidation Maintenance Chemo Arm IDA IDA IDA MTZ ATR ATR ATR ATR MTX + 6MP ATR Until CR 3 monthly cycles 2 years Lo Coco et al. NEJM, 2013

Induction Outcome ATRA + ATO ATRA + Chemo No. of patients 75 79 CR, (%) 75 (100%) 75 (95%) Induction death 0 4* Resistant sta t disease 0 0 *Differentiation syndrome (2), ischemic CVA (1) and pneumonia (1) Lo Coco et al. NEJM, 2013

APL 0406: Hematologic Toxicity Grade 3-4 thrombocytopenia >15 d p= <.0001 Grade 3-4 neutropenia >15 d 70 60 69 70 60 p=.0001 62 p= <.0001 50 p= <.0001 50 54 40 45 46 40 30 30 35 p=.0185 p=.0117 20 10 0 p= <.0001 13 4 p= <.0004 10 20 10 25 17 4 0 4 4 2 3 IND I CONS II CONS III CONS IND I CONS II CONS III CONS ATO Chemo Lo Coco et al. NEJM, 2013

APL 0406: Other Toxicities Toxicity ATRA+ATO ATRA+Chemo P value QTc prolongation 1,% 13 0 0.00050005 Hepatic toxicity 1 (Grade 3-4), % Leukocytosis 2 (>10x10 9 /L), % 57 5 <0.0001 47 24 0.007 1. Managed with temporary discontinuation and dose modification of ATO 2. Hydroxyurea 500 mg qid if WBC <50K and 1 g qid if >50K

APL 0406 Event-fr ree surviva al probabil lity 100 75 50 25 0 Event-free Survival ATRA+ATO ATRA+Chemo 97.1% 100 97.1% 85.6% p=0.02 0 12 24 36 48 60 Months from diagnosis free surviv val probab bility Disease- 75 50 25 0 Disease-free Survival ATRA+ATO ATRA+Chemo Type of event ATRA+ATO ATRA+Chemo Relapse 2 5 Death in CR 1 3 90.3% p=0.14 0 12 24 36 48 60 Months after CR Lo Coco et al. NEJM, 2013

APL 0406: Overall Survival rvival pr robabilit ty Ove erall su Lo Coco et al. NEJM, 2013 100 98.7% 91.1% 75 50 25 ATRA+ATO ATRA+Chemop=0.02 0 0 12 24 36 48 60 Months from diagnosis

APL 0406 Long-term After initial 2013 publication, more patients were enrolled (total n = 276). OS at 50 months was 99.2% vs. 92.6% (p = 0.0073) EFS at 50 months was 97.3% vs. 80% (p < 0.003) ATRA + ATO is clear standard of care for newly diagnosed standard risk APL. Grimwade et al. J Clin Oncol, 2009; Grimwade and Tallman Leukemia Res, 2010 Platzbecker U, et al. J Clin Onc 2016.

AML17 Randomized phase 3 trial of ATRA + ATO vs. ATRA + chemotherapy for newly diagnosed APL Patients with high risk disease receiving ATRA + ATO only could receive one dose of gemtuzumab ozogamicin 235 patients, 57 high risk Grimwade et al. J Clin Oncol, 2009; Grimwade and Tallman Leukemia Res, 2010 Burnett AK, et al. Lancet Oncol 2015.

AML17 ATRA + chemotherapy arm induction / consolidation regimen as per low-risk arm of AIDA2000 ATRA + ATO Induction: ATRA 45 mg/m2 until remission, ATO 0.3 mg/kg D1-5, then twice weekly on weeks 2-8 Consolidation: ATRA 45 mg/m2 D1-14, ATO 03. mg/kg D1-5, twice weekly on weeks 2-4 Gemtuzumab ozogamicin 6 mg/m2 on D1 for high- risk in ATRA + ATO patients Grimwade et al. J Clin Oncol, 2009; Grimwade and Tallman Leukemia Res, 2010 Burnett AK, et al. Lancet Oncol 2015.

AML17 results Burnett AK, et al. Lancet Oncol 2015.

AML17 Conclusions: Relapse rate lower with ATRA + ATO. Overall survival unchanged in either low-risk or high-risk cohort. Toxicities decreased overall with ATRA + ATO. QOL unchanged. Recent update at ASH 2016 confirmed above findings. Grimwade et al. J Clin Oncol, 2009; Grimwade and Tallman Leukemia Res, 2010 Burnett AK, et al. Lancet Oncol 2015.

North American Intergroup C9710 Randomized trial for newly diagnosed APL patients. 481 patients enrolled Two randomizations: ATO consolidation (yes/no) Maintenance (ATRA alone vs. ATRA + 6-MP/MTX) Grimwade et al. J Clin Oncol, 2009; Grimwade and Tallman Leukemia Res, 2010 Powell BL, et al. Blood 2010.

North American Intergroup C9710 Powell BL, et al. Blood 2010.

North American Intergroup C9710 Powell BL, et al. Blood 2010.

North American Intergroup C9710 Fairly sizeable advantage realized with addition of ATO consolidation in high and low risk disease for diseasefree and event-free survival. OS not different but p-value 0.059 (86% vs. 81% at 3 years) Not enough events to evaluate the differential effect of maintenance therapy (p-value for PFS 0.11) Grimwade et al. J Clin Oncol, 2009; Grimwade and Tallman Leukemia Res, 2010 Powell BL, et al. Blood 2010.

APML4 Australasian Leukaemia and Lymphoma Group Single-arm phase 2 trial with 124 patients, median followup for 2 years. Both low and high-risk patients were included. Grimwade et al. J Clin Oncol, 2009; Grimwade and Tallman Leukemia Res, 2010 Iland H, et al. Blood 2012.

APML4 INDUCTION CONSOLIDATION (1) MAIN ATRA D 1-35 ATRA D 1-28 ATRA, 6-MP IDA D 2,4,6,8 ATO D 1-28 MTX ATO D 9-36 PRED D 1-10 CONSOLIDATION (2) ATRA D 1-7, 15-21, 29-35 ATO D 1-5, 8-12, 22-26, 29-33 Iland H et. al, Blood 2012

eapse-fre % alive and % relapse free Low Inter High APML4 DFS by Sanz Risk Category 100% ee100-low 80-60- 40- Low Intermediate 20- High P [ trend ] =.30 0-0 P value (trend) = 0.30 2 year relapse free rate: 100%, 97%, 95%, 5 year: 100%, 93%, 95% 0 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Years from documented HCR 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Number at risk 32 31 30 22 12 8 3 1 0 60 58 Years 57 from 46 documented 32 15 HCR 8 2 0 19 18 18 12 8 6 2 0 0 High 95% Intermediate 93%

APML4 2015 update (5-year data): 5-yr OS 94% overall (high-risk h i 87%) 5-yr DFS 95% 5-yr EFS 90% 3 patients relapsed between the interim 2-year analysis and the 5-year update. Iland H et. al, Lancet Oncol 2015. Grimwade et al. J Clin Oncol, 2009; Grimwade and Tallman Leukemia Res, 2010

High-Risk APL ATRA + Risk-Adapted Chemo vs APML4 Number Median follow up IDA equivalent (months) (mg/m 2 ) (g/m 2 ) AraC DFS CIR OS PETHEMA LPA2005 118 28 122 5.8 82% 14% 79% European APL2000 74 103 99 22.8-7% 88% GIMEMA AIDA2000 129 59 122 6.3 85% 9% 83% ALLG APML4 23 50 48 0 95% 5% 87% Sanz et al. Blood, 2010; Adès et al. Am J Hematol, 2013; Lo Coco et al. Blood, 2010; Sanz et al. Best Pract Res Clin Haematol, 2003; Iland et al. ASH, 2014

MRD Monitoring Document molecular CR from marrow after consolidation (slightly more sensitive than PB by 1.5 logs) Unclear benefit in low-risk disease Potential benefit in high-risk disease, never prospectively validated, but treatment of molecular relapse is easier than hematologic relapse Monitor from PB q3 mo. for 2 yrs for high-risk, age >60, therapy interruptions or intolerance Low-risk: may not be necessary If pos PCR, repeat in 2-4 weeks; if persistent t positive, treat t as relapse Grimwade et al. J Clin Oncol, 2009; Grimwade and Tallman Leukemia Res, 2010; Grimwade Best Pract Res Clin Haematol 2015

Relapsed APL Molecular relapse ATO x 2 cycles Autograft in CR2 Morphologic relapse ATO x 2 cycles: CR 85% Autograft in CR2: 5-yr DFS 70-80% Isolated CNS relapse ATO crosses into CNS 30-50% serum levelsl ATO x 2 cycles, IT MTX/ara-C, autograft L C Bl d 1999 d 2004 E t L k i 2007 E t Bl d 2002 M l i Bl d 1997 d B tt Lo Coco Blood, 1999 and 2004; Esteve Leukemia, 2007, Estey Blood, 2002; Meloni Blood,1997; de Botton J Clin Oncol, 2005; Thomas Haematologica, 2006; Kohno Int J Hem, 2008, Kharfan-Dabaja BBMT, 2007; Au J Clin Oncol 2000; Knipp Leuk Res, 2007; Sanz Blood, 2009

Adjusted Probability of Overall Survival APL in CR2 1.0 0.8 Probabil lity 0.6 0.4 0.2 allohsct autohsct 0 0 12 24 36 48 60 72 84 96 108120 Months Chakrabarty et al. BBMT, 2014

Late Toxicities 3-5% death rate in CR reported in PETHEMA and European APL trials 1,2 Heart failure, secondary malignancies, especially as historical APL regimens have included a lot of anthracycline Possible late toxicities with ATO hypertension, DM, arrhythmia 3 1 Sanz MA, et al. Blood 2008 2 Ades L, et al. Blood 2010. 3 Shetty AV, et al. ASH 2014.

ASH 2016 Updates Two trials for high risk patients: 1) APL2006 Induction with ATRA + ida 12mg/m2 x 3 days + ara-c 200 mg/m2 x 7 days (7+3) Randomization between consolidation chemotherapy with or without ATO, ara-c later removed from ATO arm due to toxicity, results ultimately comparable 2) SWOG/Alliance/ECOG S0535 Untreated high-risk patients, GO 9 mg/m2 on D1, ATRA + ATO until remission. i Consolidation ATO x 2, ATRA + dauno x 2, GO x 2, maintenance ATRA + 6MP/MTX 3y EFS 79% Lu et al. Blood, 2002; Kumana et al. Eur J Clin Pharmacol, 2002; Au et al. Leukemia Res, 2007; Au et al. Blood 2006 and 2008

Provocative Thoughts Regarding Treatment of APL ONY AML WHERE Current therapy is directed at less chemo and can be cured with NO chemo Current strategies focus early (ED) and late (maintenance) phases of treatment Disease is as sensitive among older adults as younger Risk stratification is very simple Treatment of relapsed disease is highly effective Autograft is treatment of choice in CR2 not allograft