Phoenix/New Freedom Programs

Similar documents
OVERVIEW OF PROGRAMS

OPEN TO CHANGE - 30: Open Group Substance Abuse Curriculum

< Two different tracks one for Psychotic Spectrum and one for Mood Disorders featuring unique symptom-specific material for each

New Freedom Resource Manual

Carey guides KARI BERG

BEHAVIORAL HEALTH SERVICES Treatment Groups

RESOURCE MANUAL PHOENIX/NEW FREEDOM PROGRAMS. December 30, 2017

SIGNATURE OF COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR OR CHIEF ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICER

Bringing hope and lasting recovery to individuals and families since 1993.

Doing Time or Doing Treatment: Moving Beyond Program Phases to Real Lasting Change

Barnstable County Sheriff s Office. Vivitrol Pre-Release Program. Dr. Steven Descoteaux, MD Director of Health Services

What recovery means: Independent living. Control of symptoms. Active remission of substance use. Competitive employment

7/7/2016 Journal of the American Medical Association,

YOUTH ADDICTIONS E-THERAPY PROGRAM SPONSORED BY FEDERAL GRANT

American Addiction Centers Outcomes Study Long-Term Outcomes Among Residential Addiction Treatment Clients. Centerstone Research Institute

Evidence-Based Sentencing to Reduce Recidivism

Sexually Addicted Offender Program

PROCHASKA AND DICLEMENTE: STAGE of CHANGE MODEL. Prochaska and DiClemente s Stage of Change Model 2

The Co-Occurring Disorders Treatment Program

ORANGE COUNTY CORRECTIONS INMATE PROGRAMS

An Overview of Risk-Needs- Responsivity Model: Application to Behavioral Health Populations

Evidence-Based Sentencing to Improve Public Safety and Reduce Recidivism. A Model Curriculum for Judges

Part Two. Part Three. Drug Treatment Courts Training Workshop Montego Bay Jamaica February The Drug Treatment Court Client

Alternatives to Incarceration and Pretrial Detention. NYSAC Legislative Conference January 2019

The Phoenix/New Freedom Mental Health Programming

Barnstable House of Correction RSAT Program Guide. Introduction

Who is a Correctional Psychologist? Some authors make a distinction between correctional psychologist and a psychologist who works in a correctional f

Guadalupe County Veterans Treatment Court Participant s Handbook Updated: October 18, 2016

Index. Handbook SCREENING & TREATMENT ENHANCEMENT P A R T STEP. Guidelines and Program Information for First Felony and Misdemeanor Participants

Level of Service Inventory-Revised

POST-SENTENCE INITIATIVES FOR SEX OFFENDERS IN THE COMMUNITY: A PSYCHOLOGIST S PERSPECTIVE

Activities Guide. Module 2. Your Community, Your Mental Health Court. Developing a Mental Health Court: An Interdisciplinary Curriculum

Transition from Jail to Community. Reentry in Washtenaw County

Closing the Loop in Treating Opioid Addiction:

STAGE OF CHANGE & TX PLANNING-11/19 1

VOLUME B. Elements of Psychological Treatment

Getting To Desired Outcomes:

Nanaimo Correctional Centre Therapeutic Community

Criminal Justice Reform: Treatment and Substance Use Disorder

PRINCE GEORGES COUNTY VETERANS TREATMENT COURT

IDDT Fidelity Action Planning Guidelines

BASIC VOLUME. Elements of Drug Dependence Treatment

Adult 65D-30 Intervention ASAM Level.05 DIMENSIONS Circle all items in each dimension that apply to the client. ADMISSION CRITERIA

Integrated Treatment for Co-Occurring Disorders

Welcome to. St. Louis County Adult. Drug Court. This Handbook is designed to:

Okanogan County Juvenile Department. Okanogan County Juvenile Justice Center

Thirteen (13) Questions Judges Should Ask Their Probation Chiefs

Jail Diversion Programs for Animal Abuse Offenders

Continuing Care Strategies for Long Term Recovery

Note: The trainings below represent a foundational list, and may be adapted based on audience and need.

Interventions of Substance Use Disorders. Danica Love Brown, MSW, CACIII, PhD

RECOVERY BASICS SCOPE AND SEQUENCE. An Educational Video Based on Best Practices in Recovery Management. from

Substance Abuse Suboxone Treatment

Tri-Occurring supervision in the criminal Justice System

Addressing a National Crisis: Too Many Individuals with Mental Illnesses in our Jails

OT Interventions and Substance Abuse

Turning Point Recovery Society Program Information Guide

Responsivity in the Risk /Need Framework February 10, 2011

Contents Opioid Treatment Program Core Program Standards... 2

and Independence PROVIDING RESIDENTIAL AND OUTPATIENT TREATMENT FOR ADOLESCENTS WITH BEHAVIORAL, EMOTIONAL AND SUBSTANCE ABUSE PROBLEMS

Colorado Sex Offender Management Board

An Overview of Procedures and Roles: A Case Study on the Drug Courts of Jamaica

ACE! The Risk-Need- Responsivity Simulation Tool. The Center for Advancing Correctional Excellence. Solutions For Justice Professionals.

As a result of this training, participants will be able to:

Assessing Treatability in Abusive Men. Overview. Treatability. Lisa Buys, Ph.D., R.Psych Kierla Ireland, Industrial Intern

Note: Staff who work in case management programs should attend the AIDS Institute training, "Addressing Prevention in HIV Case Management.

PROMISING SHORT TERM INTERVENTIONS:

Improving Outcomes for Young Adults in the Justice System

Logan House: A Project Snapshot

Substance Abuse Treatment Services in the Alaska Department of Corrections

Integrated Dual Disorders Treatment (IDDT) Fidelity Scale Tips and Tools Treatment Characteristics and Organizational Characteristics

Community-based sanctions

FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF JUVENILE JUSTICE. Overview of Mental Health and Substance Abuse Services For DJJ Youth

Promising Practices Guidelines for Residential Substance Abuse Treatment

E-Career Counseling for Offender Re-entry

Effective Treatment: Doing the Right Thing, In the Right Way. Terrence D Walton, MSW, ICADC

Summary of San Mateo County Detention Facilities

Note: The trainings below represent a foundational list, and may be adapted based on audience and need.

Oriana House, Inc. Substance Abuse Treatment. Community Corrections. Reentry Services. Drug & Alcohol Testing. Committed to providing programming

UNIT 4: THE PRINCIPLE OF RESPONSIVITY & OFFENDER MOTIVATION (HOW) UNIT OVERVIEW

CHEROKEE TRIBAL DRUG COURT MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING. THIS MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING made and entered into on the 1 st day

Effective Substance Abuse Treatment in The Criminal Justice System

2016 Annual Meeting Conference

HAMPDEN COUNTY SHERIFF S DEPARTMENT S AFTER INCARCERATION SUPPORT SYSTEMS PROGRAM (AISS)

CORE PROGRAMS ADDITIONAL SERVICES

SAN MATEO COUNTY DAVID LEWIS COMMUNITY REENTRY CENTER

29/05/2014. Motivational Approaches: Supporting Individuals With Complex Needs. Triangle Community Resources. Diverse and Complex Characteristics

Carey Guides Criminogenic Needs. Carey Guides Effective Case Management USER S GUIDE

Implementing Evidence-based Practices in a Louisiana Juvenile Drug Court

2017 ADDICTION PROGRAM PACKAGE

Substance Abuse Treatment Services Alaska Department of Corrections. January, 2017

The Cost of Imprisonment

Integrated Dual Disorder Treatment IDDT

Dauphin County MH/ID Mental Health and Forensic Initiatives PRESENTATION TO RCPA SEPTEMBER 29, 2016

Multi-Dimensional Family Therapy. Full Service Partnership Outcomes Report

Knowing Your Client. Working with Developmentally Disabled Sex Offenders. Assessment is Priority. Assessment Behavior Important.

our continuum of of MATRI was

The New ASAM Criteria: Implications for Drug Courts

What Works/ Effective Treatment: Adolescents with Substance Use and Co-occurring Mental Health Disorders

Unit 2: The Risk and Needs Principles

Transcription:

Phoenix/New Freedom Programs A Road Not Taken: A Substance Abuse Program That Works! In 2007, Phoenix/New Freedom programs worked closely with Dr. Daniel Selling (currently Executive Director of Mental Health and Director of Substance Abuse Treatment for Correctional Health Services, City of New York) to create a substance abuse program for use in New York City Jails, particularly Riker s Island (a daily inmate population of around 14,000). Program History In December of 2007, the program, called A Road Not Taken, was initially implemented in two units at Riker s Island. In 2008, drug court judges began to note that inmates who completed the program were not being re-arrested as frequently as those who did not receive the programming. In May of that year, the program was officially partnered with the drug courts, and judges began sentencing offenders directly into the program. By December of 2011, the program was expanded to multiple units-- 3 male general population, 1 male Mentally Ill/Chemically Addicted unit, and 2 female general population units. The Program New Freedom s A Road Not Taken is a workbook-based group model based on: The Transtheoretical Model of Change Cognitive Behavioral Therapy Motivational Interviewing The program includes: 1. Case management 2. Individual counseling 3. Daily curriculum (group) counseling Program Evaluation Results The results of the program evaluation were highly significant! A 41.67% reduction in multiple rearrests, and a significant 23% reduction of recidivism for those experiencing a longer length of stay (more than 41 days) in the program.

A Road Not Taken Evaluation Results Counselors gathered data at intake and at discharge. Data was regularly reported to program administrators. Separate reports were quality-checked and compiled, then linked to DOC databases for incarceration history. An evaluation sample was taken of 785 clients, who were all released by November 28, 2010. Multiple arrests upon release: The jail population is typically characterized by frequent re-arrests. One year later, the analysts looked at the number of times clients in the evaluation sample were re-arrested in that 1 year period: Pre: The average number of arrests for the year prior to the jail sentence in which A Road Not Taken enrollment occurred was 1.2 times Post: The average number of arrests for the year following that jail sentence was.75. This means the average number of re-arrests per client significantly reduced from 1.2 to.751 a reduction of 41.67%*. This reduction in arrests is a significant outcome for this high-risk population. *Statistically significant: P-value <.001% Recidivism: Then the analysts looked at the percentage of clients arrested at least once during the 1 year period following discharge: Pre: The percentage of clients arrested during the year prior to the jail sentence in which ARNT enrollment occurred was 57% Post: The percentage of clients arrested during the year following that jail sentence was 43% The percentage of clients arrested in a 1 yr period significantly decreased from 57% to 43% a difference of 14%*. *Statistically significant: P-value <.001%

Length of Stay: Finally, the analysts examined the effect of length of stay in the program. The average length of stay was 41 days. So the evaluation sample was divided into those staying under 41 days and those staying over 41 days. Those in the program under 41 days saw a significant reduction in re-incarceration, from 1.26 to.982 a difference of 22% Those in the program over 41 days saw a significant reduction in re-incarceration, from 1.15 to.523 a difference of 55% Those under 41 days saw no significant reduction in recidivism from 58% to 53% Those over 41 days saw a significant reduction in recidivism from 55% to 32% a difference of 23% Conclusion In October of 2012, the research presented here was selected to be presented at the American Public Health Association 140 th Annual Meeting and Expo in San Francisco. The session, called Residential substance abuse treatment in the New York City jail system, outlined the research outlined above. You can read a full description of the session here: https://apha.confex.com/apha/140am/webprogram/paper266905.html Also presented at that meeting were the preliminary results of data from a parallel New Freedom Mental Health program called Beyond The Bridge. You can read about it here: https://apha.confex.com/apha/140am/webprogram/paper268314.html As this is a short-stay jail population, the positive outcomes presented here are especially significant. This accomplishment is even more significant when one looks at the positive differences experienced when the dosage was increased. Notice the 23% recidivism drop to 32% for those who received the program for more than 41 days. For an adult jail population, this is an unusual and noteworthy result. For more information about A Road Not Taken, Beyond The Bridge, or any of our multitude of evidence-based resources for both adult and juvenile populations, please contact us at: 212-462- 3055, or visit our websites at: www.newfreedomprograms.com/ www.phoenixcurriculum.com/ www.gangprograms.com/ www.insightandoutlook.com/

A Ro a d No t Ta k e n Ph o e n i x /Ne w Fr e e d o m Pr o g r a m s Su b s t a n c e Ab u s e Pr o g r a m Core Program Stage 1 Preparation For Treatment: Pre-contemplation Page 1 Pre1 What am I doing here? (3-6 program hours) Page 33 Pre3a,d Treatment readiness activities (3 program hours) Page 52 SD1 Introduction to Self-Discovery (3 program hours) Page 76 Stage 2 Self-Discovery: Pre-contemplation to contemplation SD7a-b My life so far (4 program hours) Page 133 SD2 What went wrong? (9 program hours) Page 165 SD5 Understanding your dependencies (8 program hours) Page 209 SD6 Reasons to change (6 program hours) Page 243 SD11 What s going on in my life? (7 program hours) Page 269 F5 Shame (6 program hours) Page 302 F11 Are you an excitement junkie? (1-2 program hours) Page 316 SA1 Self-awareness: preventing relapse by increasing your sensitivity to cues, patterns or cycles (5 program hours) Page 341 CC9 Denial (1 program hour) Stage 3 Returning Home: Preparation for community reintegration Page 351 RH6 Making positive steps to take control of your life (5 program hours) Page 381 RH5 If you lapse (5 program hours) Page 430 RH7 Avoiding the negative (5 program hours) Page 453 RH14 Getting close to getting out (2 program hours) Supplemental Resources Page 466 AODA MI 1-4 Motivational Interviewing Resources Page 606 Page 618 Page 620 Competency Checklists Fidelity Monitoring Checklist Logic Model

A Road Not Taken: LM Logic Model Page 620

New Freedom Curriculum TARGET POPULATIONS/ STRATEGIES/ IMMEDIATE INTERMEDIATE FINAL THEORY ACTIVITIES OUTCOMES OUTCOMES OUTCOMES Structured and monitored substance abuse interventions based on cognitive-behavioral, motivational enhancement, and social learning philosophies will reduce the resistance to behavioral change and decrease antisocial behaviors, including substance use and abuse Training of Program Facilitators Focus on Underlying theory of chance Facilitator as instrument of resiliency building Facilitator as change agent Preparing program staff to deliver each intervention component Pre-Contemplation (residents are unwilling to change, unaware, resistant, or in severe denial) Activities using MET/MI techniques, group contact, and brief workbooks and materials -- to engage residents, enhance motivation and receptiveness Contemplation (residents participate, but there is still some denial and/or resistance) Activities using MET/MI and CBT techniques, group contact, workbooks and materials -- to increase self-awareness and emotional recognition; realistic assessment of current lifestyle; identify values, goals, and risk factors Preparation (target population participates, uses program materials, and talks, although some resistance remains) Activities using MET/CBT techniques, group contact, workbooks and materials -- aimed to identify what needs to be changed in the offender s life; testing new ideas and learning new skill sets; understanding thinking and behavioral issues Action (target population actively pursues new and can address significant issues and feelings) Activities using CBT and social learning/relapse prevention, group contact, workbooks and materials: practice new skills; actively change negative behavioral patterns; address issues and techniques for building self-efficacy and healthy relationships Maintenance and Aftercare (target population prepares to return to the community, remain honest and continue to practice new skills) Prepare, review, and revise detailed post-release relapse prevention plans; implement pro-actively Develop action plans dealing with risk factors, family, friends, and linking with protective factors at release Staff demonstrates understanding of underlying concepts and is prepared to deliver intervention programming with high fidelity BOX 1: See Appendix for Details Staff begins to build trust, and identify and reduce resistance to the programming Target population identifies life goals and current feelings Initial steps to engage in individual and group counseling through guided self-disclosure BOX 2: See Appendix for Details Active participation in programming Target population is aware of feelings Target population identifies costs and consequences (for self and others) of old behaviors Target population identify alternative life options Box 3: See Appendix for Details Target population demonstrates insight into behavior Identifies and begin to address specific issues relating to past behaviors, including underlying thoughts and feelings, triggers, symptoms/cues Learning and demonstrating basic coping, interpersonal and communication skills BOX 4: See Appendix for Details Target population demonstrates repeatedly successful coping with variations on their highest risk situations Demonstrate competence in a range of specific coping, assertion, refusal, resistance, resiliency, violence avoidance, and self-management skills. Evidence of self-efficacy in counseling BOXES 5 & 6: See Appendix for Details Demonstrated understanding of and active participation in programming Development of post-release, recidivism, and relapse prevention plans Commitment to post-release plans Increase in resiliency factors targeted by program, including: Specific coping skills for relapse prevention Anger management skills Life skills Impulse management Environmental controls Problem solving/self-regulation Skills for dealing with thoughts, cravings, and feelings Communication skills Substance abuse education Goal setting skills Develop personal safety nets Victim empathy Gender/cultural identity Employability skills Recreation/leisure time skills Family involvement Page 621 Target population internalizes program messages Target population recognizes the negative consequences associated with deviant peer involvement Target population stays committed to prosocial behavior Target population utilizes their new assertion, refusal, resistance, and resiliency skills, and generalize them across situations Decrease in violence and substance use in residential facility Target population follow their action plans Decreased prevalence and incidence of recidivism Decreased prevalence and incidence of postrelease substance use Increased compliance with drug testing Decreased postrelease infractions of probation regulations and requirements Active participation in post-release treatment/ counseling/support groups activities as required