Surgical Stress Response and Postoperative Immune Function After Laparoscopy or Open Surgery With Fast Track or Standard Perioperative Care

Similar documents
ORIGINAL ARTICLE. Keywords Immune status. Laparoscopy. Rectal cancer. Total mesorectal excision. Introduction

Feasibility of Emergency Laparoscopic Reoperations for Complications after Laparoscopic Surgery for Colorectal Cancer

Fast Track Surgery and Surgical Carepath in Optimising Colorectal Surgery. R Sim Centre for Advanced Laparoscopic Surgery, TTSH

Clinical outcome of laparoscopic and open colectomy for right colonic carcinoma

Kurumboor Prakash, N P Kamalesh, K Pramil, I S Vipin, A Sylesh, Manoj Jacob

Long-term follow-up of the Medical Research Council CLASICC trial of conventional versus laparoscopically assisted resection in colorectal cancer

Enhanced Recovery after Surgery - A Colorectal Perspective. R Sim Centre for Advanced Laparoscopic Surgery, TTSH

Is the number of lymph nodes retrieved in laparoscopic colorectal cancer resections related to the learning curve of the surgeon?

The Feasibility of Laparoscopic Surgery Compared to Open Surgery in Patients with T4 Colorectal Cancer Staged by Preoperative Computed Tomography

Laparoscopic Resection Of Colon & Rectal Cancers. R Sim Centre for Advanced Laparoscopic Surgery, TTSH

Fast-Track Colonic Surgery: Status and Perspectives

Annals of Medicine and Surgery

Chapter I 7. Laparoscopic versus open elective sigmoid resection in diverticular disease: six months follow-up of the randomized control Sigma-trial

Citation for published version (APA): Bartels, S. A. L. (2013). Laparoscopic colorectal surgery: beyond the short-term effects

General introduction

Current perioperative management of elective colorectal resections in Ireland: When is the ideal time to introduce feeding post operatively?

Operational Efficiency in Colon Surgery Enhanced Recovery Pathways: 23 hour laparoscopic colectomy

Survival following laparoscopic versus open resection for colorectal cancer. Citation International Journal of Colorectal Disease, 2012, p.

What is the next. Can we? Should we? What s the issue? Speakers Disclosures. Laparoscopic Colorectal Surgery After 80.

Clinical Study Laparoscopic versus Open Surgery for Colorectal Cancer: A Retrospective Analysis of 163 Patients in a Single Institution

Fast Track Surgery at the University Teaching Hospital of Kigali: A Randomized Controlled Trial Study in Abdominal Surgery

Laparoscopic vs Robotic Rectal Cancer Surgery: Making it better!

Anus,Rectum and Colon

Senior Visceral Surgery Fast-Track in Colorectal Surgery The anesthetist s point of view

Enhanced recovery programmes in colorectal surgery are less enhanced later in the week: An observational study

ANICOLAU.RO. Enhanced Recovery after Colorectal Surgery. Irina Grecu, Alexandru E. Nicolau, Olle Ljungqvist*

Critical Reviews in Oncology/Hematology 33 (2000)

Surgical Apgar Score Predicts Post- Laparatomy Complications

Laparoscopic surgery for colon cancer

National trends in the uptake of laparoscopic resection for colorectal cancer,

Carcinoma del colon-retto: La Chirurgia Robotica nella Malattia Avanzata

Use of laparoscopy in general surgical operations at academic centers

Jennifer Straatman 1 Miguel A. Cuesta 1 Jurriaan B. Tuynman 1 Alexander A. F. A. Veenhof 2 Willem A. Bemelman 3 Donald L.

ERAS. Presented by Timothy L. Beard MD, FACS, CPI Bend Memorial Clinic

Outcomes Following Surgery for Distal Rectal Cancers: A Comparison between Laparoscopic and Open Abdomino- Perineal Resection

How much colon should be resected?

FTS Oesophagectomy: minimal research to date 3,4

Laparoscopic right-sided colon resection for colon cancer has the control group so far been chosen correctly?

Fluid Balance in an Enhanced Recovery Pathway. Edwin Itenberg, DO, FACS, FASCRS St. Joseph Mercy Oakland MSQC/ASPIRE Meeting April 28, 2017

Nutritional Support in the Perioperative Period

Original article Postoperative ileus in colorectal surgery: is there any difference between laparoscopic and open surgery?

TAP blocks vs wound infiltration in laparoscopic colectomies Results of a Randomised Controlled Clinical Trial

Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial of Conventional Versus Laparoscopic Surgery for Colorectal Cancer Within an Enhanced Recovery Programme: EnROL

Show Me the Evidence: Epidurals, PVBs, TAP Blocks Christopher L. Wu, MD Professor of Anesthesiology The Johns Hopkins Hospital

Increasing evidence exists for the safety, efficacy, and

Laparoscopic vs Open Total Mesorectal Excision for Rectal Cancer: A Clinical Comparative Study in a Government Sector Hospital

Clinical Study Three Ports Laparoscopic Resection for Colorectal Cancer: A Step on Refining of Reduced Port Surgery

Laparoscopy assisted versus open surgery for multiple colorectal cancers with two anastomoses: a cohort study

LONG TERM OUTCOME OF ELECTIVE SURGERY

Annals of Surgical Innovation and Research 2012, 6:5

Comparison of survival of patients receiving laparoscopic and open radical resection for stage II colon cancer

ENHANCED RECOVERY AFTER SURGERY CONTROVERSY SYMPOSIUM UNIVERSITY OF PRETORIA

Laparoscopic Colorectal Surgery

The effect of laxative use in length of hospital stay and complication rate in patients undergoing elective colorectal surgery within an ERAS setting.

Evaluation of Enhanced Recovery Protocol for Elective Colorectal Surgical Operations in Assiut University Hospital

Cost impact analysis of Enhanced Recovery After Surgery program implementation in Alberta colon cancer patients

Original Article A preliminary comparison of clinical efficacy between laparoscopic and open surgery for the treatment of colorectal cancer

Outcomes of Laparoscopic Surgery for Colorectal Cancer in Elderly Patients

JMSCR Vol 05 Issue 02 Page February 2017

Perceptions of the application of fast-track surgical principles by general surgeons

State-of-the-art of surgery for resectable primary tumors

A Randomized Trial of Laparoscopic versus Open Surgery for Rectal Cancer

7/31/2015. Enhanced Recovery After Surgery: Change Your Mind, Change Your Practice. Objectives. Enhanced Recovery Society

ANICOLAU.RO. What is ERAS? Enhanced Recovery After Surgery. A.E.Nicolau*,Irina Grecu** Spitalul Clinic de Urgenta

Simone Targa. Impact of an ERAS Colorectal Program on clinical outcomes and costs

Title: Long term survival following laparoscopic and open colectomy for colon cancer: A meta-analysis of RCTs

Hand-assisted laparoscopic surgery versus laparoscopic right colectomy: a meta-analysis

Nutritional Support in the Perioperative Period

Fast-track rehabilitation vs conventional care in laparoscopic colorectal resection for colorectal malignancy: A meta-analysis

Araújo et al. Bras. J. Video-Sur., July/September 2008 of Videoendoscopic Surgery

Chapter I 6. Annals of Surgery 2009, 249 (1): 39-44

Karen Lok Man Tung, Michael Ka Wah Li. Introduction

Acute Diverticulitis. Andrew B. Peitzman, MD Mark M. Ravitch Professor of Surgery University of Pittsburgh

Laparoscopic versus open sigmoid resection for diverticular disease: follow-up assessment of the randomized control Sigma trial

ENHANCED RECOVERY AFTER SURGERY (ERAS) PATHWAYS PARESH C. SHAH MD FACS VICE CHAIR OF SURGERY DIRECTOR OF GENERAL SURGERY

Jose Ramos. Role of Surgery in isolated hepatic metastasis from breast carcinoma, melanoma or sarcoma

Repeat Single Incision Laparoscopic Surgery after Primary Single Incision Laparoscopic Surgery for Colorectal Disease

Is laparoscopic rectal surgery really not noninferior?

Incidence and risk factors of anastomotic leaks. By: khaled Said Assistant professor of colorectal surgery Alexandria

Outcomes associated with robotic approach to pancreatic resections

Colonic stenting anno 2014

DIVERTICULAR DISEASE. Dr. Irina Murray Casanova PGY IV

Index. Note: Page numbers of article titles are in boldface type.

Outcome of rectal cancer after radiotherapy with a long or short waiting period before surgery, a descriptive clinical study

Stellenwert der prä- und postoperativen Sicht des Chirurgen

Comparative study of oncologic outcomes for laparo scopic vs. open surgery in transverse colon cancer

University of Groningen. Colorectal Anastomoses Bakker, Ilsalien

Outcomes of Conversion of Laparoscopic Colorectal Surgery to Open Surgery

Longterm Complications of Hand-Assisted Versus Laparoscopic Colectomy

Role of Alvimopan (Entereg) in Gastrointestinal Recovery And Hospital Length of Stay After Bowel Resection

We are IntechOpen, the world s leading publisher of Open Access books Built by scientists, for scientists. International authors and editors

Safety and Feasibility of a Laparoscopic Colorectal Cancer Resection in Elderly Patients

WORLD JOURNAL OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY

Postoperative Ileus. UCSF Postgraduate Course in General Surgery Maui, HI March 20, 2011

Early Rectal Cancer Surgical options Organ Preservation? Chinna Reddy Colorectal Surgeon Western General, Edinburgh

Primary tumor with synchronous metastases

Transanal Endoscopic Microsurgery

Initial experience of reduced port surgery using a two-surgeon technique for colorectal cancer

Meta-analysis of well-designed nonrandomized comparative studies of surgical procedures is as good as randomized controlled trials

Current Use and Surgical Efficacy of Laparoscopic Colectomy in Colon Cancer

Transcription:

RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL Surgical Stress Response and Postoperative Immune Function After Laparoscopy or Open Surgery With Fast Track or Standard Perioperative Care A Randomized Trial A. A. F. A. Veenhof, MD, PhD, M. S. Vlug, MD, M. H. G. M. van der Pas, MD, C. Sietses, MD, PhD, D. L. van der Peet, MD, PhD, E. S. M. de Lange-de Klerk, MD, PhD, H. J. Bonjer, MD, PhD, W. A. Bemelman, MD, PhD, and M. A. Cuesta, MD, PhD Objective: To evaluate the effect of laparoscopic or open colectomy with fast track or standard perioperative care on patient s immune status and stress response after surgery. Methods: Patients with nonmetastasized colon cancer were randomized to laparoscopic or open colectomy with fast track or standard care. Blood samples were taken preoperatively (baseline), and 1, 2, 24, and 72 hours after surgery. Systemic HLA-DR expression, C-reactive protein, interleukin-6, growth hormone, prolactin, and cortisol were analyzed. Results: Nineteen patients were randomized for laparoscopy and fast track care (LFT), 23 for laparoscopy and standard care (LS), 17 for open surgery and fast track care (OFT), and 20 for open surgery and standard care (OS). Patient characteristics were comparable. Mean HLA-DR was 74.8 in the LFT group, 67.1 in the LS group, 52.8 in the OFT group, and 40.7 in the OS group. Repeated-measures 2-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) showed this can be attributed to type ofsurgery and notaftercare (P = 0.002). Interleukin-6 levels were highest in the OS group. Repeated-measures 2-way ANOVA showed this can be attributed to type of surgery and not aftercare (P = 0.001). C-reactive protein levels were highest in the OS group. Following repeated-measures 2-way ANOVA, this can be attributed to type of surgery and not aftercare (P = 0.022). Growth hormone was lowest in the LFT group. Following repeated-measures 2-way ANOVA, this can be attributed to type of aftercare and not to type of surgery (P = 0.033). No differences between the groups were seen regarding prolactin or cortisol. No differences in (infectious) complication rates were observed between the groups. Conclusions: This randomized trial showed that immune function of HLA- DR in patients undergoing laparoscopic surgery with fast track care remains highest. This can be attributed to type of surgery and not aftercare. These results may indicate a reason for the accelerated recovery of patients treated laparoscopically within a fast track program as described in the LAparoscopy and/or FAst track multimodal management versus standard care (LAFA-Trial) (www.trialregister.nl, protocol NTR222). (Ann Surg 2012;255:216 221) The first minimally invasive colon resection was described in 1991 by Jacobs et al. 1 The short-term advantages of minimally invasive colon resection have been well established in several randomized From the Department of Surgery, and Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, VU University Medical Center; and Department of Surgery, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. Received for publication October 4, 2010; accepted November 15, 2011. Disclosure: The authors state that they have no proprietary interest in the products named in this article. Reprints: A. A. F. A. Veenhof, MD, PhD, Room 7F035, VU University Medical Center, Postbus 7057, 1007 MB Amsterdam, The Netherlands. E-mail: a.veenhof@vumc.nl. Copyright C 2012 by Lippincott Williams & Wilkins ISSN: 0003-4932/12/25502-0216 DOI: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e31824336e2 trials. 2 5 However, major surgery still remains associated with postoperative morbidity and adverse effects such as pain, and cardiopulmonary, infective, and thromboembolic complications. A major factor in the development of morbidity is the surgical stress response with subsequent increased demand on the patient s reserves and immune competence. Increased demands in organ functions are thought to be mediated by trauma-induced endocrine and metabolic changes. Human leukocyte antigen (HLA)-DR expression on monocytes is a measure for immune competence and is associated with adequate presentation of antigen and specific immune response in humans. Levels of C-reactive protein (CRP) and cytokines are closely related with the inflammatory response and the extent of the inflamed tissue involved, and with the activity of the immune reaction. Interleukin-6 (IL-6) levels are associated with postoperative complication rates and are a predictor of morbidity after surgical intervention. Previously, Harmon et al 6 andwuetal 7 have described lower IL-6 levels after laparoscopic colectomy in smaller trials. Schwenk et al 8 reported lower concentrations of both IL-6 and CRP after laparoscopic colectomy. After the introduction of minimally invasive techniques, in 2001, Kehlet and colleagues introduced the second major advancement in modern elective colorectal surgery; the implementation of the fast track perioperative care. 9 11 The fast track recovery program comprises a multidisciplinary approach aiming to reduce surgical stress response, enhance immune function, and thereby reduce organ dysfunction and allow for a faster recovery after surgery. 9 To date, there is little evidence for a better-preserved immune status, which is in line with the observed lower morbidity and faster recovery of minimally invasive colectomy. In addition, no previous studies have investigated immune status and stress response after fast track recovery programs. Hence, the aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of laparoscopic or open colectomy with fast track or standard perioperative care on patient s immune status and stress response after surgery. PATIENTS AND METHODS Eligible patients were those with a histologically confirmed malignancy or adenoma planned for an elective, segmental, curative colectomy. Patients had to be between 40 and 80 years of age with American Society of Anaesthesiologists grades I through III. Patients with a previous midline laparotomy, emergency surgery, a planned stoma, or immune depressant disease or medication were excluded from this study. Once informed consent was obtained, patients included in the VU University Medical Center and Academic Medical Center were randomized. This was done as a substudy of the LAparoscopy and/or FAst track multimodal management versus standard care (LAFA-Trial), a randomized trial set up as a 2 2 balanced factorial design. 12 216 www.annalsofsurgery.com Annals of Surgery Volume 255, Number 2, February 2012

Annals of Surgery Volume 255, Number 2, February 2012 Surgical Stress Response Randomization was achieved by means of an Internet module. Patients were randomized to 4 different treatment groups; laparoscopy and fast track care (LFT), laparoscopy and standard care (LS), open surgery and fast track care (OFT), and open surgery and standard care (OS). The study was conducted in accordance with the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki and the present protocol was approved by the local medical ethics review boards (protocol NTR222). 12 Peripheral blood and serum (BD Vacutainer Systems, Plymouth, United Kingdom) were collected preoperatively (baseline), 1, 2, 24, and 72 hours after surgery. All samples had to be collected within 10 minutes of the exact preset postoperative times. Transportation of the serum to the laboratory had to be accomplished within 10 minutes. Serum IL-6, CRP, prolactin, cortisol, and growth hormone samples were obtained by centrifugation for 10 minutes at 3000 rpm at 4 C. All samples were stored in aliquots at 80 C until tested in a 1-block fashion. HLA-DR expression on monocytes was analyzed directly on full-blood samples. Immune Status HLA-DR Expression on Monocytes Numbers and phenotype of white blood cells and monocytes were determined in fresh (<2 hours) heparinized venous blood. Phenotyping was performed by using CD14-PE and HLA-DR-FITC moabs (Becton Dickinson, San Jose, CA), subsequent lysis of erythrocytes and fixation with paraformaldehyde. Monocyte HLA- DR expression was evaluated by fluorescence-activated cell sorting (FACS) analysis (FACS Calibur, Becton Dickinson) quantified by using calibration beads (QuantumTM 26; Flow Cytometry Standards Corp, Bangs Laboratories, Inc, Fisher, IN) and expressed as ratio of the mean fluorescence intensity post-/pre-surgery. IL-6 IL-6 concentrations in serum were measured using commercially available enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay kits (Pelikine compact human ELISA kits; Sanquin, Amsterdam, The Netherlands). C-Reactive Protein Plasma CRP levels were measured by immunoturbidimetric method, using the BM/Hitachi 705 (Boehringer, Mannheim, Germany). Stress Response Cortisol Cortisol concentrations in serum were measured by competitive immunoassay (Bayer Diagnostics, Mijdrecht, The Netherlands). Prolactin Prolactin concentrations in serum were measured by immunometric assay (Diagnostic Products Corporation, Los Angeles, CA). Growth Hormone Growth hormone concentrations in serum were measured by immunometric Assay (Bayer Diagnostics). Statistical Analysis Statistical analysis was performed using the SPSS software package (SPSS 16.0 for Windows; SPSS, Chicago, IL). Medians, means, percentages, and ranges were calculated and subsequently depicted when appropriate. Chi-square tests, Kruskal-Wallis tests, and analysis of variance (ANOVA) tests were applied for group comparison when appropriate. Because of large numbers, in some tables data are presented as percentage from baseline levels, this is clearly labeled. The repeated-measures 2-way ANOVA was used for evaluation of the 2 2 factorial design on raw data. An intention-to-treat principle was applied; therefore, conversions were still analyzed in the laparoscopic group. Immune and stress response parameters were found to have a skewed normal distribution. Therefore, calculations were executed on the 10 log and subsequent ratios of the original parameters giving a better normal distribution for calculations. Significance was set at P < 0.05. RESULTS Patients A total of 79 patients were randomized. Nineteen patients were randomized for LFT, 23 for LS, 17 for OFT, and 20 for OS (Fig. 1). All patients allocated to a group were entered and observed. Patient characteristics in terms of age, body mass index, sex, American Society of Anaesthesiologists classification, or operative procedure were comparable for all groups and are depicted in Table 1. Of all bloodsample accrual times described by protocol, 94.7% of samples were collected and analyzed on time as described by study protocol. Missing values were mainly caused by time delay and subsequently arrived at the laboratory outside the time interval (10 minutes) indicated by protocol. These samples were therefore not analyzed. Immune Status All values for immune competence are depicted in Table 2A. Monocyte HLA-DR expression was used as a parameter for surgeryinduced attenuated immune competence. HLA-DR expression remained highest in the LFT group for all postoperative time intervals (Table 2A; Fig. 2). Mean HLA-DR expression on monocytes for the combined postoperative time intervals is depicted in Table 2B. Following repeated-measures 2-way ANOVA, this can be attributed to type of surgery and not aftercare. No interaction was found between type of surgery and aftercare. (Table 2C.) IL-6 levels were used as a parameter for extent of inflamed and damaged tissues. IL-6 levels were highest in the OS group for all postoperative time intervals (Table 2A; Fig. 3). Mean IL-6 level for the combined postoperative time intervals is depicted in Table 2B. Following repeated-measures 2-way ANOVA, this can be attributed to type of surgery and not aftercare. No interaction was found between type of surgery and aftercare. (Table 2C.) C-reactive protein levels were used as a parameter for extent of inflamed and damaged tissues. C-reactive protein levels were highest in the OS group for all postoperative values (Table 2A and Fig. 4). Mean CRP level for the combined postoperative time intervals is depicted in Table 2B. Following repeated-measures 2-way ANOVA, this can be attributed to type of surgery and not aftercare. No interaction was found between type of surgery and aftercare. (Table 2C.) Stress Response Growth hormone was lowest in the LFT group (Table 2A). Mean growth hormone level for the combined postoperative time intervals is depicted in Table 2B. Following repeated-measures 2-way ANOVA, this can be attributed to type of aftercare and not surgery. No interaction was found between type of surgery and aftercare. (Table 2C.) Prolactin and cortisol levels did not differ during the postoperative follow-up. Operative and Hospital Data Duration of the operative procedure was significantly longer for laparoscopy, whereas blood loss was significantly lower. In-hospital morbidity for the first 72 hours was similar for all groups. One patient in the LS group required a conversion because of a bulky tumor with C 2012 Lippincott Williams & Wilkins www.annalsofsurgery.com 217

Veenhof et al Annals of Surgery Volume 255, Number 2, February 2012 FIGURE 1. Consort flow diagram. TABLE 1. Patient and Tumor Characteristics Variable LFT (n = 19) LS (n = 23) OFT (n = 17) OS (n = 20) P Sex, n(%) 0.12 Male 10 (53) 19 (82) 9 (53) 14 (70) Female 9 (47) 4 (18) 8 (47) 6 (30) Age, mean (range), y 65 (46 80) 68 (42 80) 65 (40 80) 68 (42 80) 0.77 BMI, mean (range) 27 (22 36) 24 (20 32) 27 (19 39) 25 (21 31) 0.14 American Society of Anaesthesiologists, n (%) 0.53 1 7 (37) 7 (30) 3 (18) 6 (30) 2 11 (58) 13 (57) 13 (76) 8 (40) 3 1 (5) 3 (13) 1 (6) 6 (30) Operation, n(%) 0.09 Left-sided 14 (74) 10 (44) 9 (53) 7 (35) Right-sided 5 (26) 13 (56) 8 (47) 13 (65) Chi-square test. ANOVA test. Kruskal-Wallis test. minor ingrowth in the abdominal wall. The results of this patient were analyzed in an intention-to-treat principle and therefore analyzed in the LS group. (Table 3.) DISCUSSION This randomized trial showed that patients undergoing laparoscopic or open colectomy combined with or without perioperative fast track care have a differently preserved immune competence (HLA-DR presentation on monocytes) until 3 days after surgery. Inflammatory parameters such as IL-6 and CRP were also different. Laparoscopic surgery with fast track care showed the highest values of HLA-DR expression on monocytes. Patient undergoing OS showed the highest postoperative inflammatory parameters. Following repeated-measures 2-way ANOVA, this can be attributed to type 218 www.annalsofsurgery.com C 2012 Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

Annals of Surgery Volume 255, Number 2, February 2012 Surgical Stress Response TABLE 2A. Postoperative Immune and Stress Response Variable Groups 1h 2h 24h 72h HLA-DR LFT 87 (42 189) 59 (24 89) 73 (19 118) LS 80 (44 171) 55 (20 99) 65 (16 147) OFT 58 (6 137) 41 (15 67) 61 (13 132) OS 47 (10 92) 33 (11 62) 42 (5 102) IL-6 LFT 2,548 (97 12,063) 3,672 (92 20,475) 2,091 (200 5,515) 821 (31 3,140) LS 2,447 (68 16,500) 6,278 (100 74,525) 2,344 (202 15,607) 2,770 (33 39,508) OFT 6,342 (553 50,429) 9,702 (351 73,571) 2,227 (330 5,650) 809 (174 2,486) OS 8,196 (112 58,478) 22,850 (578 213,913) 11,151 (159 90,659) 2,357 (396 10,412) CRP LFT 101 (89 115) 96 (72 174) 2,752 (133 7,292) 2,302 (94 5,581) LS 91 (53 130) 94 (48 149) 2,302 (80 8,184) 2,916 (55 23,912) OFT 93 (64 112) 306 (72 3,744) 3,493 (512 6,976) 2,888 (481 6,760) OS 279 (72 910) 434 (77 2,186) 9,724 (391 71,053) 11,602 (366 68,579) Growth hormone LFT 171.6 (12 1,443) 65.6 (3 400) 80.1 (23 190) 102.9 (3 620) LS 618.7 (15 3,100) 514.3 (21 1,800) 613.4 (2 3,500) 185.6 (8 600) OFT 383.3 (12 2,800) 506.9 (8 2,040) 341.6 (6 1,250) 224.5 (2 800) OS 249.2 (21 700) 515.8 (6 3,200) 243.3 (6 856) 300.7 (6 1,136) Values are given as percentage with the preoperative value set at 100% for better overview and range in parentheses. TABLE 2B. Variable Groups Mean Outcome HLA-DR LFT 74.8 (26.3) LS 67.1 (23.3) OFT 52.8 (26.5) OS 40.7 (21.4) IL-6 LFT 2,523.8 (2,831.9) LS 36,429 (5813.2) OFT 4,593.9 (7774.1) OS 10,721.5 (18574.8) CRP LFT 1,426.1 (1,146.4) LS 1,347.8 (1759.5) OFT 1,705.9 (974.8) OS 5,369.8 (8569.9) Growth hormone LFT 177.3 (210.2) LS 422.7 (491.5) OFT 405.4 (450.1) OS 400.1 (396.4) Values are given as mean for combined postoperative time intervals (in percentage from baseline) and SD in parentheses. FIGURE 2. HLA-DR expression on monocytes in percentage with baseline set at 100%. TABLE 2C. Variable Groups P HLA-DR Laparoscopy or open 0.002 Fast track or standard care 0.804 Interaction 0.213 IL-6 Laparoscopy or open 0.001 Fast track or standard care 0.309 Interaction 0.233 CRP Laparoscopy or open 0.022 Fast track or standard care 0.443 Interaction 0.06 Growth hormone Laparoscopy or open 0.236 Fast track or standard care 0.033 Interaction 0.125 For repeated-measures of 2-way ANOVA. Interaction between type of surgery (lap or open) and aftercare (FT of standard care). of surgery and not aftercare. Regarding stress response, only growth hormone showed different postoperative values. Growth hormone was lowest in LFT. Following repeated-measures 2-way ANOVA, this can be attributed to type of aftercare and not surgery. No differences were observed for prolactin and cortisol levels. These results might reflect a biological substrate to the longstanding question as to why patients undergoing minimally invasive techniques have been described to have an accelerated recovery. 9,13 As described in the LAFA trial results, 12 patients treated laparoscopically with fast track perioperative care have an accelerated recovery and are discharged fastest without significant differences in morbidity. In the LAFA trial, it was also shown that the accelerated recovery is correlated more to type of surgery and less to aftercare. These results are comparable in this study. In addition, a better-preserved immune competence, including specific HLA-DR immune response, may protect against potential consequences of seeding free tumor cells and thus distant metastases. 14 As described by Wind et al 15, this is most C 2012 Lippincott Williams & Wilkins www.annalsofsurgery.com 219

Veenhof et al Annals of Surgery Volume 255, Number 2, February 2012 TABLE 3. Operative and Morbidity Data Variable LFT (n = 19) LS (n = 23) OFT (n = 17) OS (n = 20) P Operation, mean (range) Time, min 201 (130 300) 185 (120 280) 130 (60 258) 138 (60 213) 0.001 Blood loss, ml 93 (0 1000) 68 (0 600) 228 (0 500) 313 (0 1200) 0.012 Complications per patient, n (%) 2 (11) 9 (39) 6 (35) 6 (30) 0.266 All complications, n Wound infection 1 1 2 1 Ileus 1 1 3 3 Anastomotic leak 0 3 2 1 Myocardial infraction 0 2 1 1 Pneumonia 0 2 0 2 ANOVA test. Kruskal-Wallis test. FIGURE 3. Interleukin-6 levels in percentage with baseline set at 100%. FIGURE 4. C-reactive protein in percentage with baseline set at 100%. important during surgery, as circulating tumor cells are highest directly after the onset of surgery. It will therefore be interesting to investigate whether patients with better postoperatively preserved immune competence will have a lower cancer recurrence rate during follow-up. The complex interaction between inflammatory cytokines and the hypothalamic-pituito-adrenal axis is still difficult to assess. In this study, growth hormone was lowest in LFT. Following repeatedmeasures 2-way ANOVA, this can be attributed to type of aftercare and not surgery. However, cortisol and prolactin were not different between the groups. Therefore, the fast track theory including a reduced stress response due to high epidural anesthesia, which was difficult to prove because of conflicting outcomes in the present study. 10,11 However, cortisol, growth hormone, and prolactin are anterior pituitary hormones and secretion is stimulated by hypothalamic releasing factors. 13,16 Therefore, the standard epidural in fast track recovery programs may not have had any effect on these hormones. It would be interesting to evaluate the secretion of catecholamines and/or its metabolized products in future studies as the epidural would have been more likely to have had an effect on these adrenal gland stress hormones. Morbidity within 72 hours was lower in the laparoscopic group with fast track perioperative care, but did not reach a statistical difference between the 4 groups. It is, however, unlikely that the clear differences in immune response are simply based on morbidity percentages. The hypothesis that laparoscopic surgery in combination with fast track perioperative care reduces demand on the patient s immune reserves is supported by the results of this study. Other authors have described lower morbidity after fast track postoperative care. 17 In this study, 94.7% of all samples were obtained and analyzed according to study protocol. All obtained samples were analyzed in a 1-block analysis; therefore, the presented differences could not have been due to altered analyzing techniques or modified analyzing apparatus. Smaller trials investigating immune response after laparoscopic and open colectomy have previously been presented. Harmon et al 6 were the first to describe differences in postoperative IL-6 levels when laparoscopic colectomy was compared with open techniques in favor of laparoscopic surgery. Wu et al 7 measured cytokine levels both in serum and peritoneal drain fluid and found significantly lower levels of IL-6 after laparoscopic surgery confirming the previous studies. A randomized study by Schwenk et al 8 showed significantly 220 www.annalsofsurgery.com C 2012 Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

Annals of Surgery Volume 255, Number 2, February 2012 Surgical Stress Response lower peak concentrations of IL-6 and CRP 2 days after laparoscopic colon surgery. To our knowledge, no previous randomized studies have presented advantages for laparoscopic colectomy in HLA-DR presentation on monocytes. In addition, no previous studies have investigated the effect of fast track perioperative care on patient s postoperative immune status. In conclusion, this randomized trial showed that immune function is different in patients undergoing laparoscopic or open colectomy with or without a fast track program. After LFT, HLA-DR expression on monocytes was highest. Inflammatory values were highest after OS. These differences in immune competence and inflammatory response seem to be correlated to type of surgery and not to aftercare. REFERENCES 1. Jacobs M, Verdeja JC, Goldstein HS. Minimally invasive colon resection (laparoscopic colectomy). Surg Laparosc Endosc. 1991;1:144 150. 2. Lacy AM, Garcí-Valdecasas JC, Delgado S, et al. Laparoscopy-assisted colectomy versus open colectomy for treatment of non-metastatic colon cancer: a randomised trial. Lancet. 2002;359:2224 2229. 3. Nelson H, Sargent DJ, Wieand S, et al. A comparison of laparoscopically assisted and open colectomy for colon cancer.nengl J Med. 2004;350:2050 2059. 4. Veldkamp R, Kuhry E, Hop WC, et al. The Colon Cancer Laparoscopic or Open Resection Study Group. Laparoscopic surgery versus open surgery for colon cancer:short-term outcomes of a randomised trial.lancet Oncol. 2005;6:477 484 5. Guillou PJ, Quirke P, Thorpe H, et al. Short-term endpoints of conventional versus laparoscopic-assisted surgery in patients with colorectal cancer (MRC CLASICC trial): multicentre, randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2005;365:1718 1726. 6. Harmon GD, Senagore AJ, Kilbride MJ, et al. Interleukin-6 response to laparoscopic and open colectomy. Dis Colon Rectum. 1994;37:754 759. 7. Wu FPK, Sietses C, von Blomberg BME, et al. Systemic and peritoneal inflammatory response after laparoscopic or conventional colon resection in cancer patients: a prospective, randomized trial. Dis Colon Rectum. 2003;46: 147 155. 8. Schwenk W, Jacobi C, Mansmann U, et al. Inflammatory response after laparoscopic and conventional colorectal resections results of a prospective randomized trial. Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2000;385:2 9. 9. Wilmore DW, Kehlet H. Management of patients in fast track surgery. BMJ. 2001;322:473 476. 10. Kehlet H. Fast-track colorectal surgery. Lancet. 2008;371:791 793. 11. Kehlet H, Wilmore DW. Evidence-based surgical care and evolution of fasttrack surgery. Ann Surg. 2008;248:189 198. 12. Vlug MS, Wind J, Hollmann MW, et al. Laparoscopy in combination with fast track multimodal management is the best perioperative strategy in patients undergoing colonic surgery: a randomized clinical trial (LAFA-study). Ann Surg. 2011:18 [Epub ahead of print] 13. Lyons FM, Meeran K. The physiology of the endocrine system. Int Anesthesiol Clin. 1997;35:1 21. 14. Allendorf JD, Bessler M, Horvath KD, et al. Increased tumor establishment and growth after open vs laparoscopic surgery in mice may be related to differences in postoperative T-cell function. Surg Endosc. 1999;13: 233 235. 15. Wind J, Tuynman JB, Tibbe AGJ, et al. Circulating tumour cells during laparoscopic and open surgery for primary colonic cancer in portal and peripheral blood. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2009;35:942 950. 16. Desborough JP. The stress response to trauma and surgery. Br J Anaesth. 2000;85:109 117. 17. Gouvas N, Tan E, Windsor A, et al. Fast-track vs standard care in colorectal surgery: a meta-analysis update. Int J Colorectal Dis. 2009;24:1119 1131. C 2012 Lippincott Williams & Wilkins www.annalsofsurgery.com 221