Visual Fields Shawn L. Cohen, M.D. Part 2 of 4. Definitions / Tables (Part 2 of 2) Static Perimetry (Humphrey, Octopus)

Similar documents
3/16/2018. Perimetry

Perimetry Phobia: Don t fear the field Savory Turman, COMT, CPSS

VISUAL FIELDS. Visual Fields. Getting the Terminology Sorted Out 7/27/2018. Speaker: Michael Patrick Coleman, COT & ABOC

Misleading Statistical Calculations in Faradvanced Glaucomatous Visual Field Loss

Financial Disclosure. Visual Field Interpretation RELIABILITY VISUAL FIELD INTERPRETATION IN GLAUCOMA METHODS OF DATA PRESENTATION

IPS Standards and Guidelines 2010

Learn Connect Succeed. JCAHPO Regional Meetings 2017

Definitions. Indications for Perimetry. Indications for Perimetry. Purposes of Perimetry. Indications for Perimetry 3/4/2015

21st Century Visual Field Testing

Fluctuations on the Humphrey and Octopus Perimeters

CHAPTER 13 CLINICAL CASES INTRODUCTION

CHAPTER 11 KINETIC PERIMETRY WHAT IS KINETIC PERIMETRY? LIMITATIONS OF STATIC PERIMETRY LOW SPATIAL RESOLUTION

Supplementary Appendix

Visual Field Screening and Analysis PART 2 A SYSTEMATIC APPROACH TO INTERPRETATION Revised 1/16/2011

Clinical Study Visual Field Loss Morphology in High- and Normal-Tension Glaucoma

Investigative Ophthalmology & Vision Sciences MSc Course. Glaucoma Module. Visual Field Reliability Indices. David Henson 2014.

VISUAL FIELDS. Dr. Cesar Carrillo Sight For All

Pupil Exams and Visual Fields

STANDARD AUTOMATED PERIMETRY IS A GENERALLY

Quantification of Glaucomatous Visual Field Defects with Automated Perimetry

CHAPTER 5 SELECTING A TEST PATTERN INTRODUCTION

Description of new EyeSuite visual field and trend analysis functions

MOVE IT OR LOSE IT: THE ROLE OF KINETIC VISUAL FIELDS

CHAPTER 6 SELECTING A TEST STRATEGY INTRODUCTION. accurate but shorter test may yield more useful visual

The Evolution of Fundus Perimetry

CORRELATING OF THE VISUAL FIELD INDEX WITH MEAN DEVIATION AND PATTERN STANDARD DEVIATION IN GLAUCOMA PATIENTS

Characteristics of Frequency-of-Seeing Curves in Normal Subjects, Patients With Suspected Glaucoma, and Patients With Glaucoma

USER'S MANUAL. METROVISION - 4 rue des Platanes PERENCHIES FRANCE

PATTERNS OF GLAUCOMATOUS VISUAL FIELD LOSS IN SITA FIELDS AUTOMATICALLY IDENTIFIED USING INDEPENDENT COMPONENT ANALYSIS

New Concepts in Glaucoma Ben Gaddie, OD Moderator Murray Fingeret, OD Louis Pasquale, MD

Use of a portable head mounted perimetry system to assess bedside visual fields

Use of a portable head mounted perimetry system to assess bedside visual fields

TUMBLING E RESOLUTION PERIMETRY IN GLAUCOMA

OPTOMETRY. Visual fields in glaucoma:

The value of visual field testing in the era of advanced imaging: clinical and psychophysical perspectives

Diagnosing open-angle glaucoma may be particularly

Structure and Function in Early Glaucoma

Macular Ganglion Cell Complex Measurement Using Spectral Domain Optical Coherence Tomography in Glaucoma

Conventional automated perimetry measures a subject s

Case Report Optic Disk Pit with Sudden Central Visual Field Scotoma

Introduction. Paulo de Tarso Ponte Pierre-Filho, 1 Rui Barroso Schimiti, 1 Jose Paulo Cabral de Vasconcellos 1 and Vital Paulino Costa 1,2

Evaluation of Sensitivity and Specificity of Spatial Resolution and Humphrey Automated Perimetry in Pseudotumor Cerebri Patients and Normal Subjects

Specific deficits of flicker sensitivity in glaucoma and ocular hypertension

Optic Disk Pit with Sudden Central Visual Field Scotoma

RELIABLE CLASSIFICATION OF VISUAL FIELD DEFECTS IN AUTOMATED PERIMETRY USING CLUSTERING

Test-retest variability in visual field testing using frequency doubling technology

Citation for published version (APA): Stoutenbeek, R. (2010). Population based glaucoma screening Groningen: s.n.

OCTOPUS 300 Perimetry you can trust

International Journal Of Basic And Applied Physiology

Glaucoma: Diagnostic Modalities

Hidden LED Array Perimeter IVS-201A / IVS-201B. Reliable Accurate Economical. Lis t ic

A new visual field test in empty sella syndrome: Rarebit perimetry

PERIMETRY A STANDARD TEST IN OPHTHALMOLOGY

C linical visual field tests are designed to provide. Measurement error of visual field tests in glaucoma LABORATORY SCIENCE

IIH 1.0 L152~ L 33 IIIII_,. AI MICROCOPY RESOLUTION TEST CHARI JRFAU - A RDS-1963-A. doi

COMPARISON BETWEEN THRESHOLD PUPIL PERIMETRY AND SUPRATHRESHOLD PUPIL PERIMETRY

Parafoveal Scanning Laser Polarimetry for Early Glaucoma Detection

The effect of pilocarpine on the glaucomatous visual field

Evaluating Optic Nerve Damage: Pearls and Pitfalls

The Effect of Pupil Dilation on Scanning Laser Polarimetry With Variable Corneal Compensation

FORUM Glaucoma Workplace from ZEISS Clinical Interpretation Guide

A knowledge of the earliest stages of

Variability in Patients With Glaucomatous Visual Field Damage Is Reduced Using Size V Stimuli

CLINICAL SCIENCES. commonly ordered in patients

EVALUATION OF FIXATION DURING PERIMETRY USING A NEW FUNDUS PERIMETER

7/25/2018. You talk about glaucoma in cup-to-disc ratios ASSESSING THE OPTIC DISC: IS PHOTOGRAPHY STILL NECESSARY IN THE OCT ERA?

PERIMETRIC LONG-TERM FOLLOW-UP OF DIABETIC CYSTOID MACULAR EDEMA AFTER LASER TREATMENT EXTENDED TO THE FOVEAL AVASCULAR ZONE

Evaluation of the Friedmann Visual Field Analyser Mark II. Part 1. Results from a normal population

NEW AUTOMATED PERIMETERS NEW. Fast and precise perimetry at your fingertips. ZETA strategy EyeSee recording DPA analysis

Gilles de la Tourette syndrome:

CLINICAL SCIENCES. Glaucoma Monitoring in a Clinical Setting

The improvement in perimetric results occurring over

LABORATORY SCIENCES. Spatial and Temporal Processing of Threshold Data for Detection of Progressive Glaucomatous Visual Field Loss

Glaucomatous Visual Field Damage

A New Model for Assessment of Change in Visual Function in Diabetes

T he extent of damage to the optic nerve caused by nonarteritic

Learn Connect Succeed. JCAHPO Regional Meetings 2015

Assessing the GOANNA Visual Field Algorithm Using Artificial Scotoma Generation on Human Observers

Expanding your field of vision. Visual Field Analyzers from Carl Zeiss

Citation for published version (APA): Wesselink, C. (2017). Glaucoma care optimised in an ageing population [Groningen]: Rijksuniversiteit Groningen

CLINICAL SCIENCES. (FDP) was designed to emphasize the response characteristics of the parasol

Access to the published version may require journal subscription. Published with permission from: Elsevier

CHAPTER 10 NON-CONVENTIONAL PERIMETRY

In recent years, considerable interest. Short wavelength automated perimetry. Physiological Aspects of SWAP. John M. Wild

CLINICAL SCIENCES. The Severity and Spatial Distribution of Visual Field Defects in Primary Glaucoma

Study of correlation of cup disc ratio with visual field loss in primary open angle glaucoma

Quantitative analysis of central visual field defects in macular edema using three-dimensional computer-automated threshold Amsler grid testing

Perimetric testing is used clinically to detect visual field

Visual Field Interpretation Anthony B. Litwak, OD, FAAO VA Medical Center Baltimore, MD

Comparison of Visual Field Measurement with Heidelberg Edge Perimeter and Humphrey Visual Field Analyzer in Patients with Ocular Hypertension

Research Article The Pattern of Retinal Nerve Fiber Layer and Macular Ganglion Cell-Inner Plexiform Layer Thickness Changes in Glaucoma

A Visual Field Index for Calculation of Glaucoma Rate of Progression

CLINICAL SCIENCES. Screening for Glaucoma With Frequency-Doubling Technology and Damato Campimetry

The glaucomatous visual field

M Cells. Why parallel pathways? P Cells. Where from the retina? Cortical visual processing. Announcements. Main visual pathway from retina to V1

Study of Retinal Nerve Fiber Layer Thickness Within Normal Hemivisual Field in Primary Open-Angle Glaucoma and Normal-Tension Glaucoma

Method for comparing visual field defects to local RNFL and RGC damage seen on frequency domain OCT in patients with glaucoma.

The New Frontier of Microperimetry

The New Frontier of Microperimetry

Eye Movements, Strabismus, Amblyopia, and Neuro-Ophthalmology

Transcription:

Visual Fields Shawn L. Cohen, M.D. Part 2 of 4 Definitions / Tables (Part 2 of 2) Static Perimetry (Humphrey, Octopus) Normal Visual Field: Components: General Information Reliability Indices Raw Data Total Deviation Pattern Deviation Global Indices Probability Symbols General Information: Machine information: what is tested (# degrees) and how it is tested (ex. Threshold) Also: stimulus size, machine used, strategy used Patient information: Name, date, birthdate, refraction, pupil diameter, visual acuity Instrument Variables: Humphrey Octopus Background luminance 31.5 asb (=Goldmann) 4 asb Low photopic Stimulus size III or V III or V Stimulus Duration 0.2 sec 0.1 sec Fixation control Interstimulus time Cupola diameter Low photopic; Mesopic or scotopic if miosis and/or cataract Patient Variables: Refractive errors: 1.26 db reduction per Diopter uncorrected Cataracts and other media opacities Pupil diameter: General reduction in sensitivity with pupil < 2.5 mm Age: Octopus: 0.5 db/decade in central VF; 1 db/decade peripherally Social structure Perimetric experience Fatigue Psychological factors (ex. Instruction: Do not expect to see all the lights. ) Reliability Indices: False Positive (FP): Sound cue without light source or subthreshold stimulus SITA: FP = response within the patient s response time > 33% is significant False Negative (FN): No response to a 9 db brighter stimulus at a location that had a measurable threshold earlier > 33% is significant Clover leaf pattern with fatigue Fixation Losses (FL): Heijl-Krakau method of periodic testing of the blind spot Video monitor ± IR camera to detect pupil movement

Pseudofixation losses from high refractive errors due to lens-induced shift in blind spot location > 20% is significant Short-Term Fluctuation (SF): Repeated threshold @ a single point can vary within the same VF (Long-term fluctuation (LTF) occurs between sessions) 10 points retested on Humphrey; all 59 points retested on Octopus Any point 5 db above or below expected is also retested (Humphrey) > 3-4 db can indicate early glaucomatous loss, even in the presence of an otherwise normal VF Fovea Test Time After testing a badly damaged VF, it is helpful to look at the least damaged area (ex. raw data values) to determine how reliable the patient was Raw Data: Testing Algorithms: Screening or Threshold Screening: 120 point screener (H) or Program 7 (O) Compared with age-matched control data Humphrey can also screen with respect to threshold tested at 1 location/quadrant 2 Strategies: Single-level suprathreshold test Stimulus 2-6 db higher than threshold or expected hill of vision Result: seen (normal) or nor seen (defect) Name: Threshold-Related Strategy (Humphrey) 2-Level suprathreshold test 3 categories: Normal, relative defect, absolute defect Done as per single-level but abnormal spots are tested with 0 db attenuation so that a relative scotoma is seen but an absolute scotoma is not seen Threshold (Humphrey): 24-2: 54 points (including 2 points for blind spot) 30 nasally still tested; 24 elsewhere 30-2: 76 points 3 above & below the horizontal & left & right of vertical, then every 6 30-1: On the horizontal and vertical meridians 30-1 & 30-2 combined: 3 spot interval 1-2% of glaucomas have initial defects outside the central 30 10-2: Central 10 ; 68 points Fovea: 16 points, central 4 Stage I: Threshold Stage II: Abnormal points in stage I tested using past threshold of stage I Stage III: 24 points tested for reliability indices Fastpac faster than Full Threshold

Full Threshold: Fast Bracketing: 4-2 algorithm; start at a point with respect to known sensitivity for that age Normal Bracketing: 4-2 algorithm but each point retested Fastpac: Threshold tested at each point but not 4-2; 3 db steps used and threshold crossed only once Swedish Interactive Threshold Algorithm (SITA): Fast (faster than Fastpac) Standard (faster than Full Threshold) Prior knowledge of normal threshold levels, interpoint correlation, frequency of seeing curve where the db interval between steps across threshold is based on how sensitive the patient is to the steps Baysian probability calculates the probability of a point being normal or abnormal and tests threshold accordingly The patient paces the test, rather than the test pace being fixed Far fewer catch trials!!! (FP by response time analysis and FL by eye tracking) Threshold (Octopus): G-1: Program 32; 2.8 between points, expands peripherally M-1: Central 10 37 points, 1.4 grid in center Total Deviation: (Humphrey) Plot of deviation at each point relative to age-matched controls Pattern Deviation: (Humphrey) Plot of total deviation accounting for MD for each point Reset to 7 th highest threshold of non-edge points to recalculate and find focal losses Global Indices: Humphrey Octopus Mean Deviation (MD): Mean Defect (MD): Based on age-matched controls Mean of threshold values @ point = weighted-average = average Normal range 2 to +2 - Sensitive to diffuse changes but relatively insensitive to focal changes Pattern Standard Deviation (PSD): Loss Variance (LV): Normal range 0 to 6 (always +) - Depicts abnormality of smooth contour of hill of vision - Analogous to standard deviation Short term Fluctuation (SF): Short term Fluctuation (SF): Normal range < 2 Corrected PSD (CPSD): Corrected LV (CLV):

CPSD = (PSD 2 - STF 2 ) 1/2 Normal range 0 to 4 - Represents the irregularity of the contour not accounted for by SF Glaucoma Hemifield Test (GHT): - Looks at clusters of points above & below the horizontal for any sig. difference. - Describes the field as Within normal limits, Borderline or Outside normal limits Bebie Curve (Octopus): For each raw data point, the expected age-corrected normal threshold is subtracted and this difference is plotted from the least to the greatest difference / defect 5%, 95% area shaded with 2 extra lines indicated: 50%, 99% X-axis: Represents the rank of a particular test location Y-axis: Amount by which each point deviates from the normal Identifies focal and generalized losses by the slope of the different area of the curve

Arcuate = Bjerrum scotoma = in area 10-20 from fixation Paracentral = within 10 of fixation Siedel scotoma = arcuate defect than connects to the blind spot Baring of the blind spot Physiologic: artifact of kinetic perimetry as the inferior retina is less sensitive than the superior retina thus inferior isopter plotted at the threshold of the superior retina may lead to baring of the blindspot superiorly Usually confined to a single, central isopter in the superior VF Pathologic: > 1 central isopter lost 1) Paracentral and nasal step - 50% 2) Paracentral - 25% 3) Nasal step - 25% 4) Temporal wedge - 2% (myopes)