BICOE Stereotactic Breast Biopsy and Breast Ultrasound Accreditation. Introduction. Educational Objectives

Similar documents
BICOE Stereotactic Breast Biopsy and Breast Ultrasound Accreditation. Introduction. Educational Objectives

BICOE Breast Imaging Center of Excellence. What is it? - Requirements. National Mammography Database. What do you get? ACR Accreditation in:

Kish chakrabarti, Ph.D. Senior Physicist CDRH/FDA

Overview. ACR Accreditation Update in Mammography. New ACR Activities. Requirements Today. What s New For Tomorrow. ACR: Recognized by FDA and CMS

Overview. ACR Update on FFDM Accreditation. New ACR Activities. QC Today. QC Tomorrow. ACR Breast Imaging Centers of Excellence BICOE

Mammography. Background and Perspective. Mammography Evolution. Background and Perspective. T.R. Nelson, Ph.D. x41433

Implementation of the 2012 ACR CT QC Manual in a Community Hospital Setting BRUCE E. HASSELQUIST, PH.D., DABR, DABSNM ASPIRUS WAUSAU HOSPITAL

Q. Where can I find out if my state currently requires stereotactic breast biopsy accreditation?

Mammography Quality Control: A Refresher

Implementation of a New Tomosynthesis Program: A Physicists Perspective

The American College of Radiology Breast Ultrasound Accreditation Program: Frequently Asked Questions (Revised: July 31, 2017)

Disclosures. Outline. Learning Objectives. Introduction. Introduction. Stereotactic Breast Biopsy vs Mammography: Image Quality and Dose.

AAPM Annual Meeting. ACR Accreditation Update in CT

RADIATION PROTECTION IN DIAGNOSTIC AND INTERVENTIONAL RADIOLOGY. L19: Optimization of Protection in Mammography

CT Quality Control Manual FAQs

ACR MRI Accreditation Program. ACR MRI Accreditation Program Update. Educational Objectives. ACR accreditation. History. New Modular Program

Hands-On Ultrasound Physics and Quality Control Workshop. Outline

Update on MQSA and Mammography Accreditation

REGULATION: QUALITY ASSURANCE PROGRAMS FOR MEDICAL DIAGNOSTIC X-RAY INSTALLATIONS N.J.A.C. 7:28-22

ACR MRI Accreditation: Medical Physicist Role in the Application Process

Debbie Childs RDMS, RVT Sonographer Murphy Medical Center Murphy, NC

Dental ConeBeam Computed Tomography (CBCT) X-ray Systems

Routine Quality Assurance Cookbook

Update on the ACR FFDM QC Manual

The American College of Radiology Digital Mammography QC Manual: Frequently Asked Questions (Revised 12/12/2018; new and updated items in red)

Radiation Dosimetry in Digital Breast Tomosynthesis. March, 2015 William J. O Connel, Dr. Ph, Senior Medical Physicist

Hong Kong College of Radiologists Mammography Statement

PhD Title: Improving QA/QC in mammography screening and breast in Montenegro

Outline. QA/QC of Ultrasound Imagers: Basic Physics, Procedures and Experiences. Frame Rate Limitation. US Imaging Range Equation.

Dental Extraoral X-ray Systems

Current Ultrasound Quality Control Recommendations and Techniques

Ultrasound Accreditation and Regulatory Compliance from A to Z

MQSA Physicist Qualifications. Jon J. Erickson, Ph.D., DABR

Example 1: How would you evaluate this transducer? What is the most common problem found in ultrasound QC testing? Uniformity is Subjective

Dosimetry in digital mammography

Patient Dosimetry in Mammography and Tomosynthesis:

8/3/2016. Diagnostic Ultrasound Imaging Quality Assurance. Purpose. Information on US QA. James A. Zagzebski 1, Ph.D. Zheng Feng Lu 2, Ph.D.

Dental Intraoral X-ray Systems

HISTORY OF MQSA AND ACR

NONE. Disclosures. Accreditation Update

Prepublication Requirements

Computed tomography Acceptance testing and dose measurements

MR QA/QC for MRgRT. Rick Layman, PhD, DABR Department of Radiology July 13, 2015

Medical Diagnostic Imaging

Ultrasound Accreditation Program Requirements

Multicenter Trial, Phase I Assessment of 2-D FFDM Versus Combo of 2-D and 3-D Tomosynthesis in Breast Cancer Screening

Breast Imaging Essentials

Radiation Dose Reduction: Should You Use a Bismuth Breast Shield?

POSITIONING ACR REQUIREMENTS IMAGE REVIEW CATEGORIES DEFICIENCIES IN POSITIONING ACR REQUIREMENTS 3/28/2016 NUMBER 1 REASON FOR ACR FAILURE

-Ray Producing Equipment

IAEA TECDOC 1517 Quality Control in Mammography Software

Quality Control in Mammography: Results from a study in Recife, Brazil. H. J. Khoury, V. S. de Barros, M. Sampaio

Maintaining a quality mammography facility: Overview of ACR and MQSA Requirements and Update on BI-RADS 5 TH Edition

ACR Accreditation Toolkit for Validation Site Surveys

ULTRASOUND QA SOLUTIONS. Ensure Accurate Screening, Diagnosis & Monitoring DOPPLER FLOW PHANTOMS MULTI-PURPOSE PHANTOMS TRANSDUCER TEST PHANTOMS

Accreditation Case Review: Mammography and Stereotactic Biopsy

Radiographic techniques in screen-film mammography

The Radiology Aspects

ULTRASOUND QA SOLUTIONS. Ensure Accurate Screening, Diagnosis and Monitoring DOPPLER FLOW PHANTOMS MULTI-PURPOSE PHANTOMS TRAINING PHANTOMS

Low Dose CT Lung Screening: What is Technically Required?

TG-128: Quality Assurance for Prostate Brachytherapy Ultrasound

Overview of the 2005 IOM Report Improving Breast Imaging Quality Standards

ULTRASOUND QA SOLUTIONS. Ensure Accurate Screening, Diagnosis & Monitoring DOPPLER FLOW PHANTOMS MULTI-PURPOSE PHANTOMS TRANSDUCER TEST PHANTOMS

History of MQSA ACR creates testing procedures Oct Mammography Quality Standards Act Dec 1993 Interim Regulations Oct All mammog

2001 AAPM Summer School Seattle, Washington ACR R/F Phantom

CT Low Dose Lung Cancer Screening. Part I. Journey to LDCT LCS Program

Contrast-Enhanced Digital Mammography

Steven Tate Nicholas

ESTABLISHING DRLs in PEDIATRIC CT. Keith Strauss, MSc, FAAPM, FACR Cincinnati Children s Hospital University of Cincinnati College of Medicine

Mammographic Accreditation Phantom

Effects of Quality Assurance Regulatory Enforcement on Performance of Mammography Systems: Evidence From Large- Scale Surveys in Taiwan

Bone Densitometry Equipment Operator

SOMATOM Drive System Owner Manual Dosimetry and imaging performance report

MAMMOGRAPHY QC: MORE THAN PHANTOM IMAGES. Stephanie Schofield RTR QC Technologist Nova Scotia Health Authority

icat Precise Policy and Procedure Manual

Toshiba Aquillion 64 CT Scanner. Phantom Center Periphery Center Periphery Center Periphery

CASE STUDIES. Population. Compression

1. Introduction. 2. Technical procedures

Examination of dose evaluation method for mammography: comparison of ACR, Euref and IAEA

Fetal Dose Calculations and Impact on Patient Care

Quality Control Program Of Real Time Medical Ultrasound Machines In Sudan

WOMEN S HEALTH SOLUTIONS. The power and promise of breast tomosynthesis is here. Selenia Dimensions system with Acquisition Workstation 8000

Using Monte Carlo Method for Evaluation of kvp & mas variation effect on Absorbed Dose in Mammography

The power and promise of breast tomosynthesis is here. Selenia Dimensions system with Acquisition Workstation 5000

Testing of the Implementation of the Code of Practice on Dosimetry in X-ray Diagnostic Radiology Hungarian Contribution

Mammograms Obtained with Rhodium vs Molybdenum Anodes: Contrast and Dose Differences

ACCREDITATION CASE REVIEW 2: US AND US-GUIDED BIOPSY CRITERIA

ACR Accreditation Update in MRI

Breast dosimetry system in screen/film mammography

Introduction and Background

9/3/2015. New Mammographic Modality Training. Mammographer. Qualified Radiologic Technologist. Tomosynthesis Training

Breast Tomosynthesis. What is breast tomosynthesis?

A tissue-equivalent phantom series for mammography dosimetry

To Shield or Not to Shield? Lincoln L. Berland, M.D.

Canadian Partnership for Quality Radiotherapy. Technical Quality Control Guidelines for Gamma Knife Radiosurgery. A guidance document on behalf of:

CURRENTLY FDA APPROVED ARE FULL FIELD DIGITAL MAMMOGRAPHY SYSTEMS AND FILM SCREEN STILL BEING USED AT SOME INSTITUTIONS

X-Ray & CT Physics / Clinical CT

1 Course Syllabus + Study Guide for Lecture and Laboratory

X-ray Safety Discussion and Tour for Health Physicists

WHAT TO EXPECT. Breast Tomosynthesis An additional screening tool in the fight against breast cancer HOLOGIC. The Women's Health Company

Transcription:

BICOE Stereotactic Breast Biopsy and Breast Ultrasound Accreditation William Geiser, MS DABR Senior Medical Physicist MD Anderson Cancer Center Houston, Texas wgeiser@mdanderson.org 1 Introduction Objectives Program Requirements Physicists Role Testing Requirements 2 Educational Objectives Understand the annual test requirements for stereotactic breast biopsy systems. Understand the testing requirements for breast ultrasound systems for BICOE. Help facilities obtain the designation of Breast Imaging Center of Excellence. 3 1

What is it? - Requirements ACR Accreditation in: Mammography ACR or State Accreditation Stereotactic Breast Biopsy Ultrasound Must include ultrasound guided breast biopsy 4 Physicists Role Mammography Accreditation Annual testing (required) QC Program Review (required) Dose Measurement (required) Stereotactic Breast Biopsy Accreditation Annual Testing (required) QC Program Review (required) Dose Measurement (required) 5 Physicists Role Ultrasound Accreditation (by June 2014) The ACR strongly recommends that QC be done under the supervision of a qualified medical physicist. The qualified medical physicist may be assisted by properly trained individuals in obtaining data, as well as other aspects of the program Annual testing (required) 6 2

MQSA Physicist Initial Requirements Mammography MQSA Stereotactic Breast Biopsy ACR Ultrasound - None Continuing requirements Mammography MQSA Stereotactic Breast Biopsy ACR Ultrasound - None 7 Stereotactic Breast Biopsy Physicist Initial Qualifications Qualified to perform Mammography surveys under MQSA Perform one (1) hands on survey of a stereotactic breast biopsy unit under a QMP or at least 3 independent surveys prior to 6/1/97 Continuing Experience Upon renewal 2 SBB surveys over a 24 month period Continuing Education Upon renewal 3 CEU s in SBB every three years Ref: http://www.acr.org/accreditation/stereotactic/stereotactic_breast_reqs.aspx 8 What are the minimum continuing experience requirements for the physicist performing stereotactic breast biopsy system surveys for the ACR Accreditation program? 1. 1 stereotactic breast biopsy survey over a 12 month period 2. 2 stereotactic breast biopsy surveys over a 24 month period 3. 3 stereotactic breast biopsy surveys over a 24 month period 4. 3 stereotactic breast biopsy surveys over a 36 month period 5. 4 stereotactic breast biopsy surveys over a 36 month period 10 9 3

Answer 2. 2 stereotactic breast biopsy surveys over a 24 month period Ref: Stereotactic Breast Biopsy Program Requirements: American College of Radiology http://www.acr.org/accreditation/stereotactic.aspx 10 Ultrasound - Physicist Still no requirements listed! 11 Stereotactic Breast Biopsy Program Requirements Quality Assurance Questionnaire Test Image Data Sheet Dosimeter Clinical Images (on film) Phantom Images (on film) Medical Physicists Annual Survey Report Daily, Weekly Tech QC (one month) Monthly, Quarterly, Semi-annual Tech QC records (one year) 12 4

Technologist Quality Control Daily Localization Accuracy Test Phantom Imaging (weekly) Printer QC (monthly) Visual Checklist (monthly) Compression (semi-annually) Repeat Analysis (quarterly) Zero Alignment Test (per manufacturer) Dark Room Testing (if using film screen) 13 Daily Localization Accuracy Test 14 15 5

16 17 Upright Stereo Biopsy 18 6

19 20 Stereotactic Breast Biopsy Annual testing required by physicist ACR QC Manual available Ref: Stereotactic Breast Biopsy Quality Control Manual 1999 American College of Radiology 21 7

Stereotactic Breast Biopsy Annual Test Prone Table Unit Assembly Evaluation Collimation Assessment Focal Spot Performance and System Limiting Spatial Resolution kvp Accuracy Beam Quality Assessment (Half Value Layer) 22 Stereotactic Breast Biopsy Annual Test Prone Table Automatic Exposure Control(AEC) or Manual Exposure Assessment Uniformity of Screen Speed (Screen Film Systems) Digital Receptor Uniformity (For Digital Image Receptors) Breast Entrance Exposure, Average Glandular Dose, and Exposure Reproducibility 23 Stereotactic Breast Biopsy Annual Test Prone Table Image Quality Evaluation Artifact Evaluation Localization Accuracy Test 24 8

Stereotactic Breast Biopsy Annual Test Upright Add On Unit Assembly Evaluation Beam Quality Assessment (Half Value Layer) With paddle and at kvp for stereo phantom Breast Entrance Exposure, Average Glandular Dose Image Quality Evaluation (with mini phantom) Localization Accuracy Test 25 Unit Assembly Evaluation Mechanically Stable Moving parts Locks/Detents Image receptor no vibes Compressed breast thickness indicator No rough edges Technique charts 512/1024 modes Radiation shielding Needle guides support needle 26 Collimation CR Image 27 9

Collimation If any edge of radiation field deviates more than 5 mm from the edge of the image receptor, or if any edge of the compression paddle projects into the X-ray field by more than 5 mm, then seek service adjustment. 28 What is the maximum allowable alignment deviation of the radiation field edge to the image receptor for a stereotactic breast biopsy system? 1. 1 mm 2. 2 mm 3. 3 mm 4. 4 mm 5. 5 mm 10 29 Answer 5. 5 mm Ref: Stereotactic Breast Biopsy Quality Control Manual 1999, Medical Physicist Section, Collimation Assessment, American College of Radiology 30 10

Focal Spot Performance and System Limiting Resolution Action Limit: Note any significant degradation from previous measurement and seek service. 31 kvp Action Limit: If the mean kvp differs from the nominal by more than +/- 5% of the nominal kvp, or if the coefficient of variation exceeds 0.02, then seek service correction 32 Beam Quality Half Value Layer HVL kvp/100 33 11

Automatic Exposure Control (AEC) 34 Technique Chart Breast Thickness Exposure Mode kvp Setting Density Control Setting Phototimed (Yes or No) < 3 cm 512 26 N/A Yes 3 to 5 cm 512 28-30 N/A Yes 5 to 7 cm 512 30-32 N/A Yes > 7 cm 512 34 N/A Yes Breast Thickness Exposure Mode kvp Setting Density Control Setting Phototimed (Yes or No) < 3 cm 1024 28 N/A Yes 3 to 5 cm 1024 30-32 N/A Yes 5 to 7 cm 1024 32-34 N/A Yes > 7 cm 1024 34 N/A No 400 mas 35 Select kvp Use AEC and make exposure Measure mean pixel value in center of field Meet manufacturers specifications AEC Performance 36 12

AEC Ideally, clinical techniques (whether AEC or manual) should keep exposure times under 2 seconds while meeting manufacturers signal requirements Ref: Stereotactic Breast Biopsy Quality Control Manual 1999 37 Digital Field Uniformity Both 512 and 1024 modes Action Limit: If SNR(I) / SNR(Center) is > 1.15 or < 0.85, seek service correction. 38 Digital Field Uniformity May require manufacturers service manual for procedure. 39 13

40 Breast Entrance Exposure Average Glandular Dose, and Exposure Reproducibility Use AEC to expose Phantom Find closest manual technique Replace phantom with ion chamber Make 4 exposures 41 Dose 42 14

Dose We check both 512 and 1024 modes Made change to technique chart to get 1024 mode to be less than 300 mrad The average glandular dose to an average (4.2 cm compressed) breast should not exceed 3 mgy (300 mrad) per view for filmscreen or digital image receptors 43 Technique Chart Breast Thickness Exposure Mode kvp Setting Density Control Setting Phototimed (Yes or No) < 3 cm 512 26 N/A Yes 3 to 5 cm 512 28-30 N/A Yes 5 to 7 cm 512 30-32 N/A Yes > 7 cm 512 34 N/A Yes Breast Thickness Exposure Mode kvp Setting Density Control Setting Phototimed (Yes or No) < 3 cm 1024 28 N/A Yes 3 to 5 cm 1024 30-32 N/A Yes 5 to 7 cm 1024 32-34 N/A Yes > 7 cm 1024 34 N/A No 400 mas 44 What is the maximum allowable dose per view to a 4.2 cm compressed breast as recommended by the ACR? 1. 1.5 mgy 2. 2.0 mgy 3. 2.5 mgy 4. 3.0 mgy 5. 3.5 mgy 10 45 15

Answer 4. 3.0 mgy Ref: Stereotactic Breast Biopsy Quality Control Manual, Medical Physicist Section Breast Entrance Exposure, Average Glandular Dose, and Exposure Reproducibility 46 Image Quality Evaluation 47 Required Minimum Scores-Film Screen Mammography Accreditation Phantom 4.0 Fibers 3.0 Specs 3.0 Masses Total: 10.0 Mini-phantom 2.0 Fibers 2.0 Specs 2.0 Masses Total: 6.0 48 16

Required Minimum Scores - Digital Receptor Mammography Accreditation Phantom 5.0 Fibers 4.0 Specs 3.5 Masses Total: 12.5 Mini-phantom 3.0 Fibers 3.0 Specs 2.5 Masses Total: 8.5 49 What are the minimum scores for a digital receptor when using the miniphantom? 1. 1.0 Fibers, 1.0 Spec groups, 1.0 Masses 2. 2.0 Fibers, 2.0 Spec groups, 2.5 Masses 3. 3.0 Fibers, 3.0 Spec groups, 2.5 Masses 4. 3.5 Fibers, 3.5 Spec groups, 3.0 Masses 5. 4.0 Fibers, 4.0 Spec groups, 4.0 Masses 10 50 Answer 3. 3.0 Fibers, 3.0 Spec groups, 2.5 Masses Ref: Stereotactic Breast Biopsy Quality Control Manual, Medical Physicist Section Image Quality Evaluation 51 17

Artifact Evaluation Note any artifacts or non-uniformities in the field. Both 512 and 1024 modes 52 Localization Accuracy Test 53 Localization - Prefire 54 18

Localization - Postfire 55 Add On Biopsy Systems 56 Beyond Annual Mammo Testing HVL at Phantom kvp with Stereo Paddle HVL Measurement for Tomo Biopsy Dose Measurement for Phantom for Both Image Quality with Stereo Phantom Localization 57 19

HVL - Upright Stereo Add On Aluminum Ion Chamber 58 59 60 20

Tomosynthesis Guided Biopsy 61 Tomosynthesis Guided Biopsy FDA approved No ACR Accreditation Program No Manufacturers QC Program Do what you think is best 62 Breast Ultrasound Accreditation 63 21

Requirements prior to June 2014 64 Changes to Breast Ultrasound Program Effective June 2014 Acceptance Testing Quality Control Tests Annual Survey S:\AccredMaster\Umbrella Program\Application DMAP V2\overview_reqs\reqs\breast_ultrasound_reqs_5-29-13.DOCX 65 Acceptance Testing Initial performance testing of newly installed imaging equipment must be performed and should be completed before clinical use 66 22

Continuing Quality Control A continuous QC program is essential to assure the proper functioning of all ultrasound equipment and to identify problems before the diagnostic utility of the equipment is significantly impacted 7,8. Routine QC is typically performed by appropriately trained sonographers or equipment service engineers. In addition to testing done for the annual survey, all scanners and all transducers in routine clinical use should be tested quarterly, but must be tested at least semiannually. 7. Mårtensson M, Olsson M, Brodin LÅ. Ultrasound transducer function: annual testing is not sufficient. Eur J Echocardiogr. 2010 Oct;11(9):801-5. 8. Hangiandreou NJ, Stekel SF, Tradup DJ, Gorny KR, King DM. Four-year experience with a clinical ultrasound quality control program. Ultrasound Med Biol. 2011 Aug;37(8):1350-7. 67 5 Tests for the Technologist 1. Physical and Mechanical Inspection 2. Image Uniformity and Artifact Survey 3. Geometric Accuracy (mechanically scanned transducers only) 4. Ultrasound scanner Electronic Display Performance 5. Primary Interpretation Display Performance* Only required if located at the facility where ultrasound is performed 68 Annual Survey The QC tests listed in the table below are required (unless they are designated as optional) and must be performed at least annually on all machines and transducers in routine clinical use. 69 23

Program Requirements Annual Survey Physical and Mechanical Inspection Image Uniformity and Artifact Survey Geometric Accuracy System Sensitivity Ultrasound Scanner Electronic Image Display Performance Primary Interpretation Display Performance* 70 Program Requirements Annual Testing Contrast Resolution (Optional) Spatial Resolution (Optional) Evaluation of QC Program 71 Starting June 2014 what is the recommended frequency for equipment surveys of ultrasound equipment for the ACR s breast ultrasound accreditation program? 1. Quarterly 2. Semiannually 3. Annually 4. Every other year 5. None 10 72 24

Answer 3. Annually Ref: Stereotactic Breast Biopsy Accreditation Program Requirements http://www.acr.org/accreditation/breast.aspx 73 Electrical Mechanical Condition Power cord Wheel Locks, Brakes Housing Scan Head Cable, Plugs Scan Head Housing, Window Monitor Air Filters VCR Printer Function 74 System Sensitivity Depth of Pen 75 25

Uniformity and Artifacts 76 Vertical Distance Accuracy 77 Horizontal Distance Accuracy 78 26

Anechoic Void Perception 79 Ring Down Dead Zone 80 Lateral Resolution 81 27

Axial Resolution 82 Evaluation of Sites QC Program Review semiannual QC results 83 Questions? 84 28