Meta-analysis: Advanced methods using the STATA software

Similar documents
Meta Analysis. David R Urbach MD MSc Outcomes Research Course December 4, 2014

How to Conduct a Meta-Analysis

Fixed Effect Combining

LITERA VALLEY ZEE SCHOOL, HOSUR

Biostatistics II

Epidemiologic Methods I & II Epidem 201AB Winter & Spring 2002

Meta-Analysis. Zifei Liu. Biological and Agricultural Engineering

Index. Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2017 T.J. Cleophas, A.H. Zwinderman, Modern Meta-Analysis, DOI /

Treatment effect estimates adjusted for small-study effects via a limit meta-analysis

Randomized experiments vs. Propensity scores matching: a Meta-analysis.

Applied Medical. Statistics Using SAS. Geoff Der. Brian S. Everitt. CRC Press. Taylor Si Francis Croup. Taylor & Francis Croup, an informa business

Research Synthesis and meta-analysis: themes. Graham A. Colditz, MD, DrPH Method Tuuli, MD, MPH

f WILEY ANOVA and ANCOVA A GLM Approach Second Edition ANDREW RUTHERFORD Staffordshire, United Kingdom Keele University School of Psychology

Evidence-Based Medicine and Publication Bias Desmond Thompson Merck & Co.

C2 Training: August 2010

Cochrane Pregnancy and Childbirth Group Methodological Guidelines

Types of Data. Systematic Reviews: Data Synthesis Professor Jodie Dodd 4/12/2014. Acknowledgements: Emily Bain Australasian Cochrane Centre

Live WebEx meeting agenda

Evidence Based Medicine

Appendix 1: Supplementary tables [posted as supplied by author] Table A. Details of MeSH Search Terms

heterogeneity in meta-analysis stats methodologists meeting 3 September 2015

How to do a meta-analysis. Orestis Efthimiou Dpt. Of Hygiene and Epidemiology, School of Medicine University of Ioannina, Greece

Performance of the Trim and Fill Method in Adjusting for the Publication Bias in Meta-Analysis of Continuous Data

Estimation of effect sizes in the presence of publication bias: a comparison of meta-analysis methods

Meta-analysis: Basic concepts and analysis

Critical Thinking A tour through the science of neuroscience

PRACTICAL STATISTICS FOR MEDICAL RESEARCH

Applying Evidence-Based Practice with Meta-Analysis

Design and Analysis Plan Quantitative Synthesis of Federally-Funded Teen Pregnancy Prevention Programs HHS Contract #HHSP I 5/2/2016

GUIDELINE COMPARATORS & COMPARISONS:

CHL 5225 H Advanced Statistical Methods for Clinical Trials. CHL 5225 H The Language of Clinical Trials

Explaining heterogeneity

Choice of axis, tests for funnel plot asymmetry, and methods to adjust for publication bias

Thresholds for statistical and clinical significance in systematic reviews with meta-analytic methods

(A) (B) 2019 American Diabetes Association. Published online at

Introduction to diagnostic accuracy meta-analysis. Yemisi Takwoingi October 2015

Author Manuscript Faculty of Biology and Medicine Publication

Evaluating the results of a Systematic Review/Meta- Analysis

Meta-analysis: Methodology

An example of a systematic review and meta-analysis

Meta-Analysis David Wilson, Ph.D. Upcoming Seminar: October 20-21, 2017, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania

Results. NeuRA Worldwide incidence April 2016

Systematic reviews and meta-analyses of observational studies (MOOSE): Checklist.

18/11/2013. An Introduction to Meta-analysis. In this session: What is meta-analysis? Some Background Clinical Trials. What questions are addressed?

Supplementary Online Content

Chapter 1: Exploring Data

Traumatic brain injury

Problem solving therapy

Consumer willingness-to-pay and attitudes for farm animal welfare: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Results. NeuRA Forensic settings April 2016

Systematic Reviews and Meta-analysis

Systematic review with multiple treatment comparison metaanalysis. on interventions for hepatic encephalopathy

Results. NeuRA Hypnosis June 2016

Introduction to Meta-Analysis

Answer all three questions. All questions carry equal marks.

Workshop: Cochrane Rehabilitation 05th May Trusted evidence. Informed decisions. Better health.

Models for potentially biased evidence in meta-analysis using empirically based priors

SUPPLEMENTAL DIGITAL CONTENT FILE 2

SYSTEMATIC REVIEW: AN APPROACH FOR TRANSPARENT RESEARCH SYNTHESIS

Appendix Document A1: Search strategy for Medline (1960 November 2015)

Animal-assisted therapy

Contour enhanced funnel plots for meta-analysis

The role of MTM in Overviews of Reviews

Regina Louie, Syntex Research, Palo Alto, California Alex Y aroshinsky, Syntex Research, Palo Alto, California

Cochrane Breast Cancer Group

Clinical research in AKI Timing of initiation of dialysis in AKI

Méta régression (MR) Marc Sznajder, Patricia Samb (décors: Roger Hart Costumes: Donald Cardwell ) Staff DIHSP janvier 2009

Data extraction. Specific interventions included in the review Dressings and topical agents in relation to wound healing.

Modern Regression Methods

Fundamental Clinical Trial Design

Results. NeuRA Treatments for internalised stigma December 2017

NeuRA Sleep disturbance April 2016

Tiago Villanueva MD Associate Editor, The BMJ. 9 January Dear Dr. Villanueva,

RESEARCH. Dagfinn Aune, 1,2 Abhijit Sen, 1 Manya Prasad, 3 Teresa Norat, 2 Imre Janszky, 1 Serena Tonstad, 3 Pål Romundstad, 1 Lars J Vatten 1

Systematic Reviews and Meta- Analysis in Kidney Transplantation

EPSE 594: Meta-Analysis: Quantitative Research Synthesis

Results. NeuRA Mindfulness and acceptance therapies August 2018

Beyond RevMan: Meta-Regression. Analysis in Context

Friday :00 am to 10:00 am ABST (Final) Paper- VI. Tax Planning & Mgt. Advanced Management Accounting

Supplementary materials

S4. Summary of the GALNS assay validation. Intra-assay variation (within-run precision)

Introduction to Meta-analysis of Accuracy Data

Guselkumab (plaque psoriasis)

Critical Appraisal of a Meta-Analysis: Rosiglitazone and CV Death. Debra Moy Faculty of Pharmacy University of Toronto

Large Research Studies

the standard deviation (SD) is a measure of how much dispersion exists from the mean SD = square root (variance)

Fall 2018: Spring 2019:

THE BREAST COURSE 2010

Saturday 8/26/2017 7:00am - 7:00pm Closed 11:00am - 9:00pm Closed Closed

Understandable Statistics

Supplementary Online Content

Bureau Advisory Group Meeting 4 March 2019

Other potential bias. Isabelle Boutron French Cochrane Centre Bias Method Group University Paris Descartes

Statistical considerations in indirect comparisons and network meta-analysis

Distraction techniques

Advanced IPD meta-analysis methods for observational studies

PROTOCOL. Francesco Brigo, Luigi Giuseppe Bongiovanni

Overview. Goals of Interpretation. Methodology. Reasons to Read and Evaluate

Contents. Part 1 Introduction. Part 2 Cross-Sectional Selection Bias Adjustment

Transcription:

Page 1 sur 5 Wednesday 20 September 2017 - Introduction to meta-analysis Introduction I. Why do a meta-analysis? II. How does a meta-analysis work? Some concepts III. Definition of an «effect size» 1. The concepts of parameter, estimator and estimation 2. «Effect sizes» based on means a. The mean (mu) b. The difference in means (D) c. The standardized mean difference (d and g) d. The ratio of means (R) e. Which of the measures D, d, g and R to use and when? Exercises (means) 3. «Effect sizes» based on binary data a. The proportion (p) b. The Relative Risk (RR) c. The Odds Ratio (OR) d. The Risk Difference (RD) e. Which of the three measures RR, OR et RD to use and when? Exercises (binary data) 14h00-14h15 14h15-14h35 14h35-15h15 15h15-15h45 15h45-16h00 16h00-16h40 16h40-17h15h

Page 2 sur 5 Thursday 21 September 2017 - Introduction to meta-analysis 4. «Effect sizes» based on correlations 5. Conversion of «Effect sizes» Exercises (correlations and conversions) Morning IV. Fixed effect model versus random effects models 1. The fixed effect model a. Estimation of the fixed effect model : «Inverse variance method» b. Estimation of the fixed effect model with rare events 2. The random effects model a. Estimation of the «between studies» variance b. Estimation of random effects model: «DerSimonian&Laird» method c. Estimation of random effects model with rare events 3. How to chose between the two models Exercises (fixed effect vs. random effects models) V. The heterogeneity 1. Sources of heterogeneity 2. How to identify heterogeneity? Lunch break 9h00-9h20 9h20-9h50 9h50-10h30 10h30-10h45 10h45-11h30 11h30-12h30 12h30-13h00 13h00-14h00

Page 3 sur 5 Thursday 21 September 2017 Advanced meta-analysis techniques 3. Quantifying heterogeneity a. The calculation of Cochrane Q b. The estimation of the variance τ 2 across studies c. The calculation of I 2 4. How to deal with heterogeneity? Exercises (hererogeneity) VI. Prediction interval Exercises (prediction interval) VII. Subgroups analysis 1. Which model to adopt to calculate the «combined» effect for each subgroup? 2. Is it reasonable to calculate an overall «combined» effect from each of the subgroups «combined» effect and how? 3. Method for comparing subgroups 4. The proportion of variance explained R2 14h00-14h45 14h45-15h30 15h30-15h45 15h45-16h00 16h00-16h20 16h20-17h15

Page 4 sur 5 Friday 22 September 2017 - Advanced meta-analysis techniques Morning Exercises (the analysis of subgroups) VIII. The meta-regression 1. The mathematical model 2. The residual heterogeneity indexes 3. The test of residual heterogeneity 4. The proportion of variance explained 5. The prediction interval 6. The false positive risk and the «ecological bias» Exercises (meta-regression) IX. Diagnostic tools 1. Investigation of selection bias and publication bias a. The funnel plot b. Tests of funnel plot asymmetry c. The contour-enhanced funnel plot d. What are the practical consequences of a «funnel plot» asymmetry Exercises (diagnostic tools: the funnel plot) Lunch break 9h00-9h45 9h45-10h45 10h45-11h00 11h00-11h30 11h30-12h30 12h30-13h00 13h00-14h00

Page 5 sur 5 Friday 9 December 2016 - Advanced meta-analysis techniques 2. Sensitivity analysis, residual analysis, and detection of influential studies a. The stratified funnel plot b. The Trim&Fill method c. The cumulative meta-analysis d. Residual analysis e. The detection of influential studies Exercises (diagnostic tools: sensitivity analysis) X. Can we combine randomized studies with observational studies? 1. Fundamental differences between RCTs and observational studies 2. Adjustment on the basis of quality scores 3. How many studies are required to conduct a meta-analysis? Evaluation and conclusion 14h00-15h00 15h00-15h30 15h30-15h45 15h45-16h30 16h30-16h45