Detection of SPM-1-producing Pseudomonas aeruginosa and CHDL-producing. Acinetobacter baumannii using Liquid Chromatography Mass Spectrometry

Similar documents
Detection of NDM-1, VIM-1, KPC, OXA-48, and OXA-162 carbapenemases by MALDI- TOF mass spectrometry

Screening and detection of carbapenemases

Sensitive and specific Modified Hodge Test for KPC and metallo-beta-lactamase

Original Article Clinical Microbiology

Received 31 January 2011/Returned for modification 2 March 2011/Accepted 15 March 2011

Rapid identification and resistance assessment: The future is mass spectrometry

Abstract. Introduction. Editor: R. Canton

MALDI TOF MS based carbapenemase detection from culture isolates and from positive blood culture vials

Evaluation of Six Phenotypic Methods for the Detection of Carbapenemases in Gram-Negative Bacteria With Characterized Resistance Mechanisms

Surveillance of antimicrobial susceptibility of Enterobacteriaceae pathogens isolated from intensive care units and surgical units in Russia

Emergence of non-kpc carbapenemases: NDM and more

NONFERMENTING GRAM NEGATIVE RODS. April Abbott Deaconess Health System Evansville, IN

Rapid detection of carbapenemase-producing Pseudomonas spp.

Rapid detection of carbapenemase-producing Enterobacteriaceae from blood cultures

In-House Standardization of Carba NP Test for Carbapenemase Detection in Gram Negative Bacteria

#Corresponding author: Pathology Department, Singapore General Hospital, 20 College. Road, Academia, Level 7, Diagnostics Tower, , Singapore

MHSAL Guidelines for the Prevention and Control of Antimicrobial Resistant Organisms (AROs) - Response to Questions

Use of Faropenem as an Indicator of Carbapenemase Activity

Revised AAC Short Form format. Comparison of two phenotypic algorithms to detect carbapenemaseproducing

Rapid identification of emerging resistance in Gram negatives. Prof. Patrice Nordmann

Detection of Carbapenem Resistant Enterobacteriacae from Clinical Isolates

Supplementary Material Hofko M et al., Detection of carbapenemases by real-time PCR and melt-curve analysis on the BD MAX TM System

Phenotypic detection of ESBLs and carbapenemases

Detecting Carbapenemase-Producing Enterobacteriaceae: why isn t there a single best method?

Nature and Science 2017;15(10)

Determining the Optimal Carbapenem MIC that Distinguishes Carbapenemase-Producing

Detecting CRE. what does one need to do?

ORIGINAL ARTICLE. Julie Creighton and Clare Tibbs. Canterbury Health Laboratories, Christchurch

Discussion points CLSI M100 S19 Update. #1 format of tables has changed. #2 non susceptible category

Detecting carbapenemases in Enterobacteriaceae

Carbapenem Disks on MacConkey agar as screening methods for the detection of. Carbapenem-Resistant Gram negative rods in stools.

MALDI-TOF MS: a new tool to rapidly assess antibiotic susceptibility

Educational Workshops 2016

Enterobacteriaceae with acquired carbapenemases, 2016

ALERT. Clinical microbiology considerations related to the emergence of. New Delhi metallo beta lactamases (NDM 1) and Klebsiella

Detection of carbapenemases in Enterobacteriaceae: a challenge for diagnostic microbiological laboratories

Carbapenemases in Enterobacteriaceae: Prof P. Nordmann Bicêtre hospital, South-Paris Med School

Revised AAC Version 2» New-Data Letter to the Editor ACCEPTED. Plasmid-Mediated Carbapenem-Hydrolyzing β-lactamase KPC-2 in

Identification and screening of carbapenemase-producing Enterobacteriaceae

Guidance on screening and confirmation of carbapenem resistant Enterobacteriacae (CRE) December 12, 2011

Enterobacteriaceae and glucose non-fermenting Gram-negative rods by. immunochromatography assay

Phenotypic Detection Methods of Carbapenemase Production in Enterobacteriaceae

Strains characterization Testing procedure of commercial carbapenemase detection assays

Enterobacteriaceae with acquired carbapenemases, 2015

Affinity of Doripenem and Comparators to Penicillin-Binding Proteins in Escherichia coli and ACCEPTED

Evaluation of CHROMagar msupercarba for the detection of carbapenemaseproducing Gram-negative organisms

Insert for Kit 98006/98010/ KPC/Metallo-B-Lactamase Confirm Kit KPC+MBL detection Kit KPC/MBL and OXA-48 Confirm Kit REVISION: DBV0034J

β CARBA Test Rapid detection of carbapenemase-producing Enterobacteriaceae strains Contents 1. INTENDED USE

Research Article PhenotypicDetectionofMetallo-β-Lactamase in Imipenem-Resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa

Development of a phenotypic method for fecal carriage detection of OXA-48-producing

Laboratory testing for carbapenems resistant Enterobacteriacae (CRE)

Differentiation of Carbapenemase producing Enterobacteriaceae by Triple disc Test

AAC Accepts, published online ahead of print on 13 October 2008 Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. doi: /aac

K. Lee, Y. S. Lim, D. Yong, J. H. Yum, and Y. Chong*

Laboratory CLSI M100-S18 update. Paul D. Fey, Ph.D. Associate Professor/Associate Director Josh Rowland, M.T. (ASCP) State Training Coordinator

Carbapenem-resistant Escherichia coli and Klebsiella pneumoniae in Taiwan

Biological Mass Spectrometry. April 30, 2014

Standardisation of testing for Carbapenemase Producing Organisms (CPO) in Scotland

2612 Page. *Yusuf, I 1., Rabiu A.T 1., Haruna, M 2. and Abdullahi, S. A 3. Phone:

Scottish Microbiology and Virology Network. Carbapenemase producers: screening and the new Scottish AMR Satellite Reference Laboratory Service

Impact of MALDI TOF on AST

Journal of Infectious Diseases and

Combined disk methods for the detection of KPC- and/or VIM-positive. Klebsiella pneumoniae: improving reliability for the double carbapenemase

A Simple and Accurate Method for the Rapid Quantitation of Drugs of Abuse in Urine Using Liquid Chromatography

Resistance to Polymyxins in France

Carbapenemase-producing Enterobacteriaceae

Automated Sample Preparation/Concentration of Biological Samples Prior to Analysis via MALDI-TOF Mass Spectroscopy Application Note 222

Analysis of Triglycerides in Cooking Oils Using MALDI-TOF Mass Spectrometry and Principal Component Analysis

(Plasmid mediated) Carbapenemases. Timothy R. Walsh, Cardiff University, Wales

on July 8, 2018 by guest

Fernando Pasteran, Tania Mendez, Melina Rapoport, Leonor Guerriero, and Alejandra Corso*

ST11 KPC-2 Klebsiella pneumoniae detected in Taiwan

CARBAPENEMASE PRODUCING ENTEROBACTERIACEAE

CRO and CPE: Epidemiology and diagnostic tests

KPC around the world Maria Virginia Villegas, MD, MSC

Small Molecule Drug Imaging of Mouse Tissue by MALDI-TOF/TOF Mass Spectrometry and FTMS

Carbapenems and Enterobacteriaceae

β- Lactamase Gene carrying Klebsiella pneumoniae and its Clinical Implication

Mechanisms of Resistance to Ceftazidime-Avibactam. Romney M. Humphries, PhD D(ABMM) Chief Scientific Officer Accelerate Diagnostics.

Nightmare Bacteria. Disclosures. Technician Objectives. Pharmacist Objectives. Carbapenem Resistance in Carbapenem Resistance in 2017

Evaluation of Updated Interpretative Criteria for Categorizing Klebsiella pneumoniae with Reduced Carbapenem Susceptibility

Toolkit for the Management of Carbapenemase Producing Organisms (CPO)

Analysis of Peptides via Capillary HPLC and Fraction Collection Directly onto a MALDI Plate for Off-line Analysis by MALDI-TOF

ARTICLE IN PRESS International Journal of Antimicrobial Agents xxx (2010) xxx xxx

MALDI-TOF Mass Spectrometry: A New Rapid ID Method in Clinical Microbiology

Academic Perspective in. David Livermore Prof of Medical Microbiology, UEA Lead on Antibiotic resistance PHE

Received 30 March 2005; returned 16 June 2005; revised 8 September 2005; accepted 12 September 2005

CARBAPENEM RESISTANCE FROM DIAGNOSIS TO OUTBREAK MANAGEMENT

CARBAPENEM RESISTANCE From diagnosis to outbreak management

Carbapenemases: A Review

Global Epidemiology of Carbapenem- Resistant Enterobacteriaceae (CRE)

The MALDI Biotyper An In Vitro Diagnostic System (IVD) for Identification of Bacteria and Yeasts with a Global Reach

Matrix Assisted Laser Desorption Ionization Time-of-flight Mass Spectrometry

Multidrug-resistant organisms are a major public health

Evaluation of carbapenemase screening and confirmation tests in. Enterobacteriaceae and development of a practical diagnostic algorithm

LOCALISATION, IDENTIFICATION AND SEPARATION OF MOLECULES. Gilles Frache Materials Characterization Day October 14 th 2016

(multidrug-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa; MDRP)

New Mechanisms of Antimicrobial Resistance and Methods for Carbapenemase Detection

SCIENCE CHINA Life Sciences

Transcription:

JCM Accepts, published online ahead of print on 24 October 2012 J. Clin. Microbiol. doi:10.1128/jcm.02365-12 Copyright 2012, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved. [Brief Report] Carvalhaes et al., 2012. 1 2 3 Detection of SPM-1-producing Pseudomonas aeruginosa and CHDL-producing Acinetobacter baumannii using Liquid Chromatography Mass Spectrometry (LCMS) and MALDI-TOF MS 4 5 6 Cecilia G. Carvalhaes 1*, Rodrigo Cayô 1, Diego M. Assis 2, Evelin R. Martins 1, Luiz Juliano 2,3, Maria A. Juliano 2, Ana C. Gales 1. 7 8 9 10 11 12 1 Laboratório Alerta, Disciplina de Infectologia, Departamento de Medicina, Universidade Federal de São Paulo - UNIFESP, São Paulo - SP, Brazil. 2 Departamento de Biofísica, Universidade Federal de São Paulo - UNIFESP, São Paulo - SP, Brazil. 3 Fundação Parque Zoológico de São Paulo-SP, Brazil. 13 14 Short running title: Carbapenemase activity by MALDI-TOF MS and LCMS. 15 16 17 Key words: OXA-type, SPM, non-fermentative bacilli, oxacillinases, metallo-beta- lactamases 18 19 20 21 22 *Corresponding author. Current Address: Laboratório ALERTA, Universidade Federal de São Paulo - UNIFESP, Rua Pedro de Toledo, 781, 6 th floor, Vila Clementino, 04039-032, São Paulo - SP, Brazil. Phone/Fax.: +55 11 55764748. E-mail: cicacarvalhaes@gmail.com. 23

24 25 26 27 28 29 30 Abstract This study evaluates LCMS and MALDI-TOF accuracy for detecting carbapenem hydrolytic activity among SPM-1-, GIM-1- and GES-5-producing P. aeruginosa and OXA-143-, IMP-10- and OXA-58-producing A. baumannii. Class A and B carbapenemase activities were rapidly detected by MALDI-TOF in a 2 hourassay. However, an extended incubation time was necessary for detection of carbapenem-hydrolyzing class D β-lactamase (CHDL)-activity in Acinetobacter spp. 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 Main text Over the last two decades, therapeutic options to treat infections caused by Gram negative rods has been narrowed by the acquisition of carbapenemase encoding genes (13). The rapid detection of clinically-significant carbapenemases is important for establishing adequate therapy and controlling their spread. Recently, the detection of class A or B carbapenemase activity has been accessed by matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization-time of flight mass spectrometry - MALDI-TOF MS (3,8). Although MALDI-TOF MS seems to be a promising tool, there is a lack of evidence showing its usefulness by testing a broader range of carbapenemases. To date the published studies have mainly focused on KPC-2 and NDM-1-producing Enterobacteriaceae, IMP-1-, VIM-1- and VIM-2-producing P. aeruginosa, and OXA- 23- and OXA-24-producing A. baumannii (3,8,9). In the current study, we evaluated the performance of the MALDI-TOF MS assay in detecting carbapenemase activity of GES-5-, GIM-1-, or SPM-1-producing P. aeruginosa, and IMP-10-, OXA-58- or OXA- 143-producing A. baumannii, which were not previously tested. Detection of carbapenemase by MALDI-TOF MS was compared to that of modified Hodge test

48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 (MHT) and hydrolysis assay. Additionally, LCMS was tested to confirm the results of carbapenem hydrolysis obtained by MALDI-TOF MS. A total of 73 carbapenemase-producing and non-producing bacterial clinical isolates, were studied and molecularly characterized as shown in Table 1. Generally, all carbapenemase-producing isolates were not susceptible to imipenem (IPM) and meropenem (MEM), except for three A. baumannii isolates (one OXA-23 and two IMP- 10 producers) that showed imipenem and/or meropenem MICs of 4 µg/ml by agar dilution technique (5,7). In our study, MHT using ertapenem (ETP) disk (10 µg), following CLSI guideline, detected 55%, 100% and 68% of carbapenem-hydrolyzing class D β-lactamase (CHDL), class A and class B carbapenemases, respectively. No additional carbapenemase producers were identified by testing meropenem disk (6). Recently, MHT was reported to have poor sensitivity and specificity for detecting class B and D carbapenemase activity in carbapenem-resistant A. baumannii isolates (1). A false-positive and an indeterminate result by MHT were observed in our study for a non-carbapenemase-producing P. aeruginosa and a Klebsiella pneumoniae 63 ESBL/ OmpK36, respectively, as already previously observed (4,10,11). All 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 carbapenemase isolates hydrolyzed imipenem by UV spectrometric assay in 100 mm phosphate buffer (ph 7.0) (4). The LCMS and MALDI-TOF MS assays were performed incubating fresh bacterial inoculums from Muller-Hinton agar plates (Oxoid TM, Basingstoke, UK) in a buffer adjusted solution [Tris-HCl 20 mm ph 6.8] with or without a serial dilutions of ertapenem (0,12-0.5 µg/ml; Merck Sharp&Dohme, NJ, USA) for periods of 2- and 4- hour. This buffer solution was selected since NaCl solution could inhibit the CHDL activity. After centrifugation, 1 µl aliquots of each sample were overlaid by 1 µl of α- cyano-4-hydroxycinnamic acid matrix solution (HCCA; Bruker Daltonics, Bremen,

73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 Germany) and spotted onto a stainless steel MALDI target plate, as recommended by manufacturer. Mass spectrum was obtained using a Bruker Daltonics Microflex LT instrument operating in linear, positive ion mode and using the Flex Control 3.3 software with following instrument parameters: pulsed ion extraction delay of 30 ns, ion source voltage one, 20 kv, ion source voltage two, 18.65 kv, and ion source lens voltage 7.00 kv. Mass spectrometer was calibrated using the HCCA matrix peaks ([M+H] + = 189.17; [2M+H] + = 379.35) and bradykinin fragment 1-7 ([M+H] + = 757.40). For each sample, mass spectra were acquired by accumulating 100 laser shots at 45%- 60% laser power in the m/z range of 200-600 Da. Carbapenem hydrolysis was considered positive if the ertapenem intact molecule mass peak (475 m/z and its monosodium salt, 497 m/z) completely disappeared (Figure 1 - A and B2) (3). LCMS was performed in a LCMS-2020 equipped with the ESI-145 probe (Shimadzu, Kyoto, Japan). Aliquots of 15 µl of each reaction tube were directly applied into the instrument. Analytical LCMS conditions were: XR-ODS C18 column (2 µm, 3.0 x 100 mm) which was eluted with the solvent system A (water/tfa, 1:1000) and B (ACN/water/TFA 900:100:1) at a flow rate of 1 ml/min and a 0-80% gradient for 10 min monitored by absorbance at 220 nm. Mass spectrum profile was considered positive using the same interpretative criteria established for MALDI-TOF MS assay. The performance of the MALDI-TOF MS, LCMS and hydrolysis assay in detecting class A (KPC-2 and GES-5) and B (SPM-1, IMP-1, IMP-10, VIM-1, GIM-1 and NDM-1) carbapenemase-activity was excellent for both 2- and 4-hour incubation times (100% sensitivity and 100% specificity). A similar result was observed by Burckhardt and colleagues who tested an ertapenem MALDI-TOF MS assay to detected carbapenemase-activity of NDM-1, VIM-1, VIM-2 and KPC-2 enzymes in P. aeruginosa and Enterobacteriaceae (3). In our study, an extended incubation period (4

98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 hours) was necessary to detect carbapenemase-activity of 100% of CHDL-producing A. baumannii, mainly due to OXA-23-producing isolates (Table 1). Probably an extended incubation period was necessary for detection of the carbapenemase activity in CHDLproducing isolates because these enzymes usually show a low level of carbapenemhydrolysis due to poor turnover of these β-lactams as previously noticed by Queenan and Bush (12). In addition, the expression of CHDL-encoding genes is driven by an upstream-inserted insertion sequence, ISAba1 (2). LCMS confirmed all MALDI-TOF MS results. Recently, Kempf and colleagues observed a similar detection rate (95% sensitivity) in a collection of OXA-23 and/or OXA-24-producing A. baumannii isolates by MALDI-TOF MS using imipenem and HCCA as substrate and matrix, respectively (10). In the present study, imipenem was not selected for the MALDI-TOF MS because the mass spectrum profile obtained did not show good resolution with overlap of mass peaks, even when different matrices were tested. It could be due to the MALDI-TOF MS system tested in our study, Microflex LT instrument, since Kempf and colleagues tested the Ultraflex I mass spectrometer. However, Microflex LT instrument has been the apparatus system mostly available by the European clinical laboratories. Although hydrolysis assay yielded excellent results, this method is laborious to be implemented on routine clinical laboratories. To our knowledge this is the first study to evaluate the MALDI-TOF MS performance in detecting carbapenemase activity in a collection of SPM-1, GES-5 and GIM-1-producing P. aeruginosa as well as OXA-143, IMP-10 and OXA-58-producing A. baumannii. In addition, the MALDI-TOF MS results were confirmed by using LCMS. MALDI-TOF MS is a rapid tool to detect class A and B carbapenemases activity, including SPM-1-producing P. aeruginosa in a 2 hour-assay. However, an extended incubation period of 4 hours must be tested for detection of CHDL-activity. MALDI-TOF MS has shown to be an easy, rapid and

123 124 125 126 cheap methodology for detection of carbapenemase activity. It could yield results before antimicrobial susceptibility testing be available and constitutes a very attractive methodology especially for clinical laboratories that have already used this technique for bacteria identification. 127 128 129 130 131 Funding The study was carried out as part of our routine work. A. C. G. is a researcher from the National Council for Science and Technological Development (CNPq), Ministry of Science and Technology, Brazil (Process number: 307816/2009-5). 132 133 134 Transparency declarations None to declare. 135

136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 REFERENCES 1. Bonnin RA, Naas T, Poirel L, Nordmann P. Phenotypic, Biochemical, and Molecular Techniques for Detection of Metallo-β-Lactamase NDM in Acinetobacter baumannii. J Clin Microbiol. 2012; 50: 1419-21. 2. Bogaerts P, Cuzon G, Naas T, Bauraing C, Deplano A, Lissoir B, Nordmann P, Glupczynski Y. Carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii isolates expressing the blaoxa-23 gene associated with ISAba4 in Belgium. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2008; 52:4205 6. 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 3. Burckhardt I and Zimmermann S. Using matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization-time of flight mass spectrometry to detect carbapenem resistance within 1 to 2.5 hours. J Clin Microbiol. 2011; 49: 3321-4. 4. Carvalhaes CG, Picão RC, Nicoletti AG, Xavier DE, Gales AC. Cloverleaf test (modified Hodge test) for detecting carbapenemase production in Klebsiella pneumoniae: be aware of false positive results. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2010; 65: 249-51. 5. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute. Methods for Dilution Antimicrobial Susceptibility Tests for Bacteria That Grow Aerobically - Eighth Edition: Approved Standard M07-A8. CLSI, Wayne, PA, USA, 2009. 6. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute. Performance Standards for Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing: Nineteenth Informational Supplement M100-S19. CLSI, Wayne, PA, USA, 2009. 7. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute. Performance Standards for Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing: Twenty-two Informational Supplement M100-S22. CLSI, Wayne, PA, USA, 2012.

160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 8. Hrabák J, Walková R, Studentová V, Chudácková E, Bergerová T. Carbapenemase activity detection by matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization-time of flight mass spectrometry. J Clin Microbiol. 2011; 49: 3222-7. 9. Kempf M, Bakour S, Flaudrops C, Berrazeg M, Brunel JM, Drissi M, Mesli E, Touati A, Rolain JM. Rapid detection of carbapenem resistance in Acinetobacter baumannii using Matrix-Assisted Laser Desorption Ionization- Time of Flight Mass Spectrometry. PLoS One. 2012; 7: e31676. 10. Lee K, Kim MN, Choi TY, Cho SE, Lee S, Whang DH, Yong D, Chong Y, Woodford N, Livermore DM; KONSAR Group. Wide dissemination of OXAtype carbapenemases in clinical Acinetobacter spp. isolates from South Korea. Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2009; 33: 520-4. 11. Pasteran F, Veliz O, Faccone D, Guerriero L, Rapoport M, Mendez T, Corso A. A simple test for the detection of KPC and metallo-β-lactamase carbapenemaseproducing Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolates with the use of meropenem disks supplemented with aminophenylboronic acid, dipicolinic acid and cloxacillin. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2011; 17: 1438-41. 12. Queenan AM and Bush K. Carbapenemases: the versatile β-lactamases. Clin Microbiol Rev. 2007; 20:440 58. 178 179 13. Walsh TR. Clinically significant carbapenemases: an update. Curr Opin Infect Dis. 2008; 21: 367-71.

180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 14. 15. Figure 1. A The hydrolysis of ETP mediated by β-lactamases occurs in two steps: In the first step, ETP intact molecule (475 g.mol -1 ) suffers a rupture on its β-lactam ring resulting in a hydrolyzed ETP molecule (493 g.mol -1 ). In the second step, the hydrolyzed ETP molecule loses a carboxyl-group (-CO 2 ) resulting in a metabolite with molecular weight of 450 g mol -1 (hydrolyzed and decarboxylated ETP molecule); B - Analysis of ETP degradation by MALDI-TOF MS: (B1) A negative control strain incubated with ETP solution which appears ionized with hydrogen ([ETP+H] + = 475 g mol -1 ) and its sodium adduct ([ETP+Na] + = 497 g mol -1 ) and (B2) Hydrolyzed and decarboxylated ETP after incubation with SPM-1-producing P. aeruginosa. Arrows represent HCCA matrix peaks. C - Analysis of ETP degradation by LCMS: (C1) A

191 192 193 194 negative control strain incubated with ETP which appears ionized with hydrogen ([EPT+H] + = 476 g mol -1 ) and (C2) Hydrolyzed and decarboxylated ETP after incubation with SPM-1-producing P. aeruginosa ([ETP+H] + = 450 g mol -1 ).

Table 1. Characterization of the 73 clinical isolates and performance of carbapenemase detection by different methodologies (MALDI-TOF, LCMS, MHT and Hydrolysis assay). MIC range (μg/ml) Percentage of isolates detected as carbapenemase producers (n positive isolates/ total isolates) Bacterial Species Enzymes n MALDI-TOF MALDI-TOF LCMS LCMS ETP IMP MEM MHT IMP Hydrolysis Isolates 2 hours 4 hours 2 hours 4 hours Acinetobacter baumannii 31 Oxa-23 16 16 - >256 4-64 0.5-128 56% (9/16) 100% (16/16) 19% (3/16) 100% (16/16) 19% (3/16) 100% (16/16) Oxa-23 and Oxa-143 4 256 - >256 32-256 32-256 100% (4/4) 100% (4/4) 75% (3/4) 100% (4/4) 75% (3/4) 100% (4/4) Oxa-24 and Oxa-143 1 > 256 128 256 100% (1/1) 100% (1/1) 100% (1/1) 100% (1/1) 100% (1/1) 100% (1/1) Oxa-25 1 > 256 128 256 100% (1/1) 100% (1/1) 0% (0/1) 100% (1/1) 0% (0/1) 100% (1/1) Oxa-26 1 > 256 128 256 100% (1/1) 100% (1/1) 100% (1/1) 100% (1/1) 100% (1/1) 100% (1/1) Oxa-58 3 64-128 16 8-32 0% (0/3) 100% (3/3) 0% (0/3) 100% (3/3) 0% (0/3) 100% (3/3) Oxa-23, Oxa-143 and IMP-1 1 > 256 128 256 100% (1/1) 100% (1/1) 100% (1/1) 100% (1/1) 100% (1/1) 100% (1/1) IMP-10 3 8-128 0.5-31 4-64 67% (2/3) 100% (3/3) 100% (3/3) 100% (3/3) 100% (3/3) 100% (3/3) Negative control 11 2-8 < 0.06-0.25 0.25-1 0% (0/11) 0% (0/11) 0% (0/11) 0% (0/11) 0% (0/11) 0% (0/11) Klebsiella pneumoniae 8 KPC-2 1 32 8 8 100% (1/1) 100% (1/1) 100% (1/1) 100% (1/1) 100% (1/1) 100% (1/1) NDM-1 1 128 64 32 100% (1/1) 100% (1/1) 100% (1/1) 100% (1/1) 100% (1/1) 100% (1/1) ESBL/ OmpK36 a 4 0.25 0.25-2 <0.06-16 0% (0/4) 0% (0/4) 0% (0/4) 0% (0/4) 0% (0/4) 0% (0/4) Pseudomonas aeruginosa 26 GES-5 1 256 16 256 100% (1/1) 100% (1/1) 100% (1/1) 100% (1/1) 100% (1/1) 100% (1/1) GES-1 1 64 1 4 0% (0/1) 0% (0/1) 0% (0/1) 0% (0/1) 0% (0/1) 0% (0/1) SPM-1 11 >256 128 - >256 64 - >256 64% (7/11) 100% (11/11) 100% (11/11) 100% (11/11) 100% (11/11) 100% (11/11) IMP-1 1 >256 32 >256 100% (1/1) 100% (1/1) 100% (1/1) 100% (1/1) 100% (1/1) 100% (1/1) VIM-1 2 256 - >256 256 256 0% (0/2) 100% (2/2) 100% (2/2) 100% (2/2) 100% (2/2) 100% (2/2) GIM-1 4 >256 128-256 256 - >256 100% (4/4) 100% (4/4) 100% (4/4) 100% (4/4) 100% (4/4) 100% (4/4) Negative control 6 4 - >256 0.5-16 <0.06-32 0% (0/6) 0% (0/6) 0% (0/6) 0% (0/6) 0% (0/6) 0% (0/6) a. Isolates previous characterized by Carvalhaes et al. (3); ETP, ertapenem; IPM, imipenem; MEM, meropenem; MHT, modified Hodge test; MALDI-TOF, matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization-time of flight mass spectrometry; LCMS, liquid chromatography mass spectrometry.