Human Health Risk Assessment. Marian Olsen U.S. EPA ERRD October 13, 2011

Similar documents
Outline: risk assessment. What kind of environmental risks do we commonly consider? 11/19/2013. Why do we need chemical risk assessment?

Screening Level Health Risk Assessment of PCCD/PCDF Contamination Da Nang Airbase Case Study

Risk Assessment Report for AGSS-ICS

Arkansas Department of Health

5.0 HAZARD ASSESSMENT AND RISK CHARACTERIZATION

ATTACHMENT E. Selection of Soil Ingestion Rates

1, 2, 3-Trichloropropane (TCP): Assessment of Risks from Drinking Water

ENV 455 Hazardous Waste Management

TISSUE SCREENING LEVEL GUIDELINES FOR ISSUANCE OF PUBLIC HEALTH ADVISORIES FOR SELECTED CONTAMINANTS and Supporting Documentation

APPENDIX G: TECHNICAL BASIS FOR PRELIMINARY REMEDIATION GOALS FOR FISH TISSUE IN ONONDAGA LAKE HONEYWELL

Development of NJ Human Health-based Criteria and Standards

Mark Harris June 22, th Passaic River Symposium Montclair, NJ

Baseline Human Health Risk Assessment. Terrie Boguski, Skeo Solutions

APPENDIX IV.I.1. Delivery Truck HRA

CHAPTER 8 RISK CHARACTERIZATION

HEALTH CONSULTATION. Tom Lea Park EL PASO COUNTY METAL SURVEY EL PASO, EL PASO COUNTY, TEXAS EPA FACILITY ID: TX

Table H3-1 Values Used for Daily Intake/Absorbed Dose Inhalation of Particulates

Methodologies for development of human health criteria and values for the lake Erie drainage basin.

RISK ASSESSMENT GUIDANCE FOR SUPPLEMENTAL GUIDANCE FOR INHALATION RISK ASSESSMENT SUPERFUND, PART F: Midwestern States Risk Assessment

Integrated Exposure Uptake Biokinetic (IEUBK) Model for Lead in Children

Updates to HSRA Risk Reduction Standards

Risk Assessment and 09/13/07. Learning Objectives. Nature of Risk. Risk Assessment and Environmental Policy. Gene Schroder, PhD

Risk assessment for redevelopment of contaminated land at an old industrial site

Risk Assessment Pt2. K.E. Kelly University of Utah

Hazard, exposure, and risk Thinking about risk Risk assessment processes Risk management A.001 Environmental Engineering 2

Sacramento Rendering Company Health Risk Assessment

Mount Sinai Pediatric Environmental Health Specialty Unit WTC Dioxins Fact Sheet

Chapter 6 Quantifying Exposure

Human Health Risk Assessment Guidance


The regulatory landscape. The now and the not yet

Which delivers more mercury, dental amalgam or a tuna fish sandwich? G. Mark Richardson, Ph.D. Risklogic Scientific Services Inc., Ottawa, ON CANADA

Childhood Arsenic Exposure and Health Risk Assessment from Rice Cultivated Near the Mining Areas in Korea

Risk assessment of organic verses inorganic arsenic; The toxicity of arsenite and arsenate; and Ongoing bioavailability study.

Risk Characterization

Evaluation of Mixture Exposures in Human Health Risk Assessments. Ruth Custance, MPH

CHAPTER 14 RISK ASSESSMENT. C.P. Gerba. Structure of risk analysis.

Poly-fluoroalkyl substances (PFASs), also called perfluoroalkyl substances (PFASs)

B Supporting Information for Human Health Risk Assessment

Dose and Response for Chemicals

Introduction to Food Toxicology

Protocol 30 Classifying Substances as Carcinogenic May 2018

UNITED STATES AIR FORCE IERA

Environmental Arsenic Exposure and Human Health in the Mekong River Basin of Cambodia

CHAPTER 7 TOXICITY ASSESSMENT

General Concepts of Exposure Assessment of Chemical Contaminants in Food & Water

1,4-Dioxane: Overview & NJDEP Ground Water Quality Criterion

Methodology for Developing Chemical Exposure Guidelines for Deployed Military Personnel

Assessing Risks for Inhalation and Ingestion of Pollutants

Subject: Assessing the Potential Risk of Human Exposure to Tetrachloroethylene (Perchloroethylene) and Formaldehyde

TRICHLOROETHYLENE: ASSESSING & MANAGING VAPOR INTRUSION RISKS. Kelly Schumacher EPA Region 7

Development of Interim CCME PCB Soil Quality Guidelines for Missing Pathways of Exposure for the Protection of Human Health and Ecological Receptors

Health Consultation. Apple Trees Recreational Area (PICA Site 192) PICATINNY ARSENAL ROCKAWAY TOWNSHIP, MORRIS COUNTY, NEW JERSEY

Presenting Uncertainty in the Context of Toxicological, Biological Monitoring and Exposure Information. William H.

Part 2. Chemical and physical aspects

Chemical Name: Metolachlor OXA CAS: Synonyms: Oxanilic acid degradate of metolachlor

CPH601 Chapter 3 Risk Assessment

DEVELOPMENT OF THE CHROMIUM PUBLIC HEALTH GOAL

EVALUATION OF POLYCYCLIC AROMATIC HYDROCARBONS IN CLAY TARGET FRAGMENTS AND SURFACE SOIL AT SHOT GUN RANGE SITES Presenter: Glenn Hoeger and Brian

Appendix C Risk Calculations Western Margin of Northern Plumes

Bioavailability Adjustments in Human Health Risk Assessment for Metals-Contaminated Sites

UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY REGION IX 75 Hawthorne Street San Francisco, CA 94105

RISK ASSESSMENT OF EXPOSURE TO BENZENE, TOLUENE AND FORMALDEHYDE IN RESIDENTIAL ENVIRONMENT IN CHINA

LEAD HEALTH RISK ASSESSMENT FOR RICO TOWNSITE SOILS. Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment. Mercer Island, WA

The Nutritional-Toxicological Conflict related to Seafood Consumption

Core Competencies. Course Key. HPH 550: Theories of Health Behavior & Communication

Environmental Risk Assessment Toxicity Assessment

SUDBURY AREA RISK ASSESSMENT VOLUME II EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

Chemical Name: Metolachlor ESA CAS: Synonyms: Ethanesulfonate degradate of metolachlor; CGA

6.3.5 Uncertainty Assessment

APPENDIX G - Organ/Tissue Weighting Factors and Detriment/Risk Coefficients

Ongoing activities in Risk-Benefit Assessment of Foods in Europe

Quantitative Risk Assessment of Tobacco-Burning and Tobacco-Heating Cigarettes

Human Health Risk Assessment Overview [For the APS/OPP Roundtable]

Screening-Level Risk Assessment for Styrene- Acrylonitrile (San) Trimer Detected in Soil and Groundwater

Assessing and Managing Health Risks from Chemical Constituents and Contaminants of Food

Effects of PCBs on Human Health and Wildlife Risk Assessments

Dietary Risk Assessment of Nitrates in Cyprus and the relevant uncertainties

INITIAL STATEMENT OF REASONS TITLE 27, CALIFORNIA CODE OF REGULATIONS

Evaluation of Potential Human Health Effects from Environmental Exposure to Human Pharmaceuticals

MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH STATEMENT OF NEED AND REASONABLENESS

FINAL. Recommendations for Update to Arsenic Soil CTL Computation. Methodology Focus Group. Contaminated Soils Forum. Prepared by:

APPENDIX I. Soil Risk Calculation Supporting Details. Revised EE/CA. Lower Duwamish Waterway Superfund Site: T-117 Early Action Area

11/29/2010 FOOD SAFETY CAPACITY BUILDING ON RESIDUE CONTROL

Approaches to Integrating Evidence From Animal and Human Studies in Chemical Assessments

REPORT ON REVIEW OF TOXICITY VALUES. GTAC Requisition

Composition-based risk (and benefit) assessment

ESTIMATION OF TOXICITY TO HUMANS

How to Explain Radiation Risk

Evaluation of Swimming Pool Treatment Chemicals Health Effects under NSF/ANSI Standard 50

CHARACTERIZING THE IMPACTS OF UNCERTAINTY AND SCIENTIFIC JUDGMENT IN EXPOSURE LIMIT DEVELOPMENT

Great Horned Owl Exposure to Chlorinated Organics at the Kalamazoo River Superfund Site

Cooperative Agreement with U.S. EPA on Comparative Dietary Risk. 1 Introduction

The Burden of Foodborne Chemicals

Case Study Summary: Appendix: Evaluation of Hazard Range for Three Additional Chemicals: Tetrachloroethylene, Chromium (VI) and Arsenic.

ACTIVITIES DEVELOPED AND PROMOTED BY WHO

Probabilistic Risk-Cost-Benefit Analysis of Additional Benzene Emissions Controls

Regarding Establishment of a Uniform Limit in a Positive List System concerning Agricultural Chemicals Residues in Food etc.

Protecting Public Health in Oregon via Fish Consumption Advisories

Ethylene Oxide

Transcription:

Human Health Risk Assessment Marian Olsen U.S. EPA ERRD October 13, 2011

Presentation Overview Conceptual Site Model Defining Risk Assessment Conceptual Site Model Superfund Risk Assessment Process Data Evaluation / Hazard Identification Dose Response Exposure Assessment Risk Characterization Risk Assessment and Risk Management

Why Risk Assessment? EPA conducts risk assessment to characterize the risks of cancer and non-cancer health effects posed by the site. Risk Assessments provide a framework to understand the: Nature and magnitude of the risk Adversity of the risk Confidence or reliability in estimates Areas of uncertainty Evidence supporting the decision.

Conceptual Site Model Who is exposed? What is the exposure media (i.e., sediment, fish, surface water, etc.)? What activities bring them into contact with the River (i.e., fishing, wading, swimming, etc.)? What is the frequency and duration of the exposures (i.e., # of days and # of years)? What are the potential health effects from this exposure?

Conceptual Site Model Human and Ecological: Sources, Pathways, and Receptors

BASELINE RISK ASSESSMENT 1. Data Collection and Evaluation What contaminants exist and are of potential concern? 2. Exposure Assessment How might a receptor be exposed on or off site? 3. Toxicity Assessment At what level of exposure are adverse effects likely to occur? 4. Risk Characterization What are the risks and uncertainties?

BASELINE RISK ASSESSMENT Toxicity Assessment Data Collection Data Evaluation Risk Characterization Exposure Assessment

Toxicity Assessment Toxicity Studies Animal Studies/Human Studies of workers exposed to high levels of contaminants, etc. Weight of Evidence Cancer Non-cancer health effects Toxicity Values Cancer Slope Factor Inhalation Unit Risk Oral Reference dose Inhalation Reference Concentration

CANCER RISKS Cancer Slope Factor Risks expressed as risk per unit dose or concentration 16 14 Increasing Effect 12 10 8 6 4 2 0 Increasing Dose

Non-Cancer Hazard THRESHOLD Dose (mg/kg-day)

Sources of Toxicity Information Hierarchy of Toxicity Information Memo dated 12/2003 (OSWER Directive 9285.7-53) Integrated Risk Information System Provisional Peer Reviewed Toxicity Values Other Sources ATSDR CalEPA Health Effects Assessment Summary Tables NJDEP Superfund Technical Support Center

U.S. EPA Superfund Risk Assessment Exposure Risk Toxicity Evaluated under current (baseline) and future conditions Baseline conditions evaluated in the absence of institutional or other controls Goal is health protection under reasonable maximum exposures

EXPOSURE ESTIMATES Central Tendency Exposure OBSERVATIONS Reasonable Maximum Exposure 0 TOTAL EXPOSURE

EXPOSURE FACTORS Intake = C x IR x EF x ED BW x AT EXPOSURE FACTOR Concentration in Fish (C) Ingestion Rate (IR) Exposure Frequency (EF) Exposure Duration (ED) Bodyweight (BW) AT (averaging time) VALUE Sampling Results Meals/year 365 days/year, Years 70 kgs (adult) (depends on whether a carcinogen or a non-carcinogen)

Summary of Important Exposure Factors Exposure Factor Central Estimate Reasonable Maximum (RME) Fish Ingestion Consumption (grams/day) Exposure Duration (years) Contaminants Lost in Cooking (%) Exposure to Water/Sediment Adult/Child Recreation (Summer) Adolescent Recreation (Summer) Residence Duration (years) Part of 17 Mile Study Part of 17 Mile Study

OW Hierarchy of Fish Ingestion Rates Four preference hierarchy (OW Methodology for Water Quality Criteria) use of local data; use of data reflecting similar geography/ population groups; use of data from national surveys; and use of EPA s default intake rates. (From EPA Office of Water Methodology for Deriving Water Quality Criteria for the Protection of Human Health (2000))

Cooking Loss Reasonable Maximum Exposure No Cooking Loss Central Tendency Exposure Evaluation of literature based values Dioxins PCBs Other contaminants

Other Parameters Residence Time Bodyweight - defaults 70 kgs for adult (18 years and older) 15 kgs for child (1 to 6 years of age) Lifespan 70 years

BASELINE RISK ASSESSMENT Toxicity Assessment Data Collection Data Evaluation Risk Characterization Exposure Assessment

RISK CHARACTERIZATION STEPS 1. Review exposure and toxicity data 2. Quantify risks for individual and multiple chemicals 3. Combine risks across exposure pathways 4. Evaluate and present uncertainties 5. Summarize risk assessment results

EVALUATE UNCERTAINTY CATEGORIES OF UNCERTAINTY RISK ASSESSMENT SELECTION OF SUBSTANCES EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT TOXICITY VALUES MULTIPLE PATHWAY SUMMATION Source: U.S. EPA 1989, pages 8-17

Risk Assessment and Risk Management Risk Assessment Dose Response Assessment Statutory, legal considerations Politics Risk Management Hazard Identification Exposure Assessment Risk Characterization Available Technology Social Factors Risk Management Options Economics 22

Resources Risk Portal www.epa.gov/risk National Center for Environmental Assessment including the guidelines and Exposure Factors Handbook: www.epa.gov/ncea IRIS: www.epa.gov/iris Staff paper on Principles and Practices: http://www.epa.gov/osa/ratf.htm Office of the Science Advisor: http://www.epa.gov/osa/ Superfund Guidance: http://www.epa.gov/oswer/riskassessment/risk_superfund.ht m