March 30, 2014, Joint ACC/JAMA Late-breaking Clinical Trials Session 402 American College of Cardiology, Washington DC

Similar documents
Evan A. Stein 1, David Sullivan 2, Anders G. Olsson 3, Rob Scott 4, Jae B. Kim 4, Allen Xue 4, Thomas Liu 4, Scott M. Wasserman 4

Goal Achievement after Utilizing an Anti-PCSK9 Antibody in Statin-Intolerant Subjects (GAUSS): Results from a

Accepted Manuscript. S (14) /j.jacc Reference: JAC To appear in:

Efficacy and Safety of Alirocumab in Patients with Hypercholesterolemia not on Statin Therapy: the ODYSSEY CHOICE II Study

Effect of the PCSK9 Inhibitor Evolocumab on Cardiovascular Outcomes

Randomized Comparison of the Safety, Tolerability, and Efficacy of Long-term Administration of AMG 145: 52-Week Results From the OSLER Study

Alirocumab Treatment Effect Did Not Differ Between Patients With and Without Low HDL-C or High Triglyceride Levels in Phase 3 trials

PCSK9 inhibition across a wide spectrum of patients: One size fits all?

Clinical Efficacy and Safety of Achieving Very Low LDL-C Levels With the PCSK9 Inhibitor Evolocumab in the FOURIER Outcomes Trial

Supplemental Online Content 2

PCSK9 for LDL Cholesterol Reduction: What have we learned from clinical trials?

PCSK9 antibodies: A new therapeutic option for the treatment of hypercholesterolemia

Update on Dyslipidemia and Recent Data on Treating the Statin Intolerant Patient

*Carbohydrate & Lipid Metabolism Research Unit, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa

Weigh the benefit of statin treatment: LDL & Beyond

Update on PCSK9 inhibitors and Statin Intolerance

Efficacy, Safety and Tolerability of 150 mg Q2W Dose of the PCSK9 mab REGN727/SAR236553: Data from Three Phase 2 Studies

MS Sabatine, RP Giugliano, AC Keech, PS Sever, SA Murphy and TR Pedersen, for the FOURIER Steering Committee & Investigators

Evolocumab for the treatment of primary hypercholesterolaemia and mixed dyslipidaemia

PCSK9 Inhibitors Are They Worth The Money? Michael J. Blaha MD MPH

ALN-PCSsc, an RNAi Investigational Agent That Inhibits PCSK9 Synthesis With the Potential for Effective Bi-Annual Dosing: Interim Results

Paradim Shift in cholesterol behandeling: van LDL-C target naar LDL-C eradicatie

Fasting or non fasting?

Cost-effectiveness of evolocumab (Repatha ) for primary hypercholesterolemia and mixed dyslipidemia.

Cardiology 2015: Status On Pharmacology News, Debates & Novelties

PCSK9 Inhibitors: A View of Clinical Studies

Long-term safety, tolerability and efficacy of alirocumab in high cardiovascular risk patients: ODYSSEY LONG TERM

EBBINGHAUS: - A Cognitive Study of Patients Enrolled in the FOURIER Trial

Inhibition of PCSK9: The Birth of a New Therapy

EVOLOCUMAB Generic Brand HICL GCN Exception/Other EVOLOCUMAB REPATHA 42378

The RUTHERFORD-2 trial in heterozygous FH: Results and implications

Cholesterol; what are the future lipid targets?

FOURIER: Enough Evidence to Justify Widespread Use? Did It fulfill Its Expectations?

Managing Dyslipidemia in Disclosures. Learning Objectives 03/05/2018. Speaker Disclosures

Drug Class Monograph

PCSK9 Agents Drug Class Prior Authorization Protocol

Novel Therapeutic Strategies in Lipid Management: Lowering LDL C to Improve Patient Outcomes

Contemporary management of Dyslipidemia

Efficacy and Safety of the PCSK9 Inhibitor Evolocumab in Patients with Mixed Hyperlipidemia

Accumulating Clinical data on PCSK9 Inhibition: Key Lessons and Challenges

Challenges in lipid management

The TNT Trial Is It Time to Shift Our Goals in Clinical

ANNEX I SUMMARY OF PRODUCT CHARACTERISTICS

Management of LDL as a Risk Factor. Raul D. Santos MD, PhD Heart Institute-InCor University of Sao Paulo Brazil

Lipid Lowering in Patients at High Risk for Cardiovascular Disease

What Role do the New PCSK9 Inhibitors Have in Lipid Lowering Treatment?

Common Repatha Documentation Requirements for Patients With Primary Hyperlipidemia and Established CVD 1,2

Making War on Cholesterol with New Weapons: How Low Can We/Should We Go? Shaun Goodman

Study 1 ( ) Pivotal Phase 3 Long-Term Safety Study Top-Line Results

Case Study. Case Study. Case Study

Results of the GLAGOV Trial

Impact of a 1- or 2-dose starting regimen of inclisiran, a novel sirna inhibitor to PCSK9 on time averaged LDL-C reductions over 1 year

Primary efficacy & safety outcomes

Primary efficacy & safety outcomes. LDL-C reduction from 6 to 9 months following single or second injections of inclisiran, a novel sirna compound

PCSK9 Inhibitors: Promise or Pitfall?

Systematic review of published Phase 3 data on anti-pcsk9 monoclonal antibodies in patients with hypercholesterolaemia

Prevention of Heart Disease: The New Guidelines

Familial Hypercholeterolaemia

Kevin Fitzgerald, PhD

New Lipid Lowering Agents (PCSK9 Inhibitors, Bempedoic Acid, Apabetalone) in the Elderly? The State of the Recent Knowledge Prof.

Martin/Hopkins Estimation, Friedewald and Beta- Quantification of LDL-C in Patients in FOURIER

THIERS CHAGAS BAHIA FOURIER- ESTUDO DE INIBIÇÃO DA PCSK9 EM PACIENTES DE ALTO RISCO CARDIOVASCULAR

PCSK9 inhibition in homozygous familial hypercholesterolaemia

Modern Lipid Management:

EVIDENCE TO DATE EVOLOCUMAB (REPATHA)

Cholesterol Reduction Therapy in 2018 A Perspective Role Of Statins, Ezetimibe and PCSK9-Inhibitors

Lipoprotein(a), PCSK9 Inhibition and Cardiovascular Risk: Insights from the FOURIER Trial

2.0 Synopsis. Choline fenofibrate capsules (ABT-335) M Clinical Study Report R&D/06/772. (For National Authority Use Only) Name of Study Drug:

Disclosures. Prevention of Heart Disease: The New Guidelines. Summary of Talk. Four guidelines. No relevant disclosures.

Drug Class Review Proprotein Convertase Subtilisin Kexin type 9 (PCSK9) Inhibitors

2013 ACC AHA LIPID GUIDELINE JAY S. FONTE, MD

New Strategies for Lowering LDL - Are They Really Worth It?

Guidelines on Lowering LDL-C Levels

Lipid Update and Case Studies: Comparing ATP III, AHA/ACC Guidelines and the National Lipid Association Recommendations 2017

A Naturally Randomized Trial Comparing the Effect of Genetic Variants that Mimic CETP Inhibitors and Statins on the Risk of Cardiovascular Disease.

LDL and the Benefits of Statin Therapy

Managing Dyslipidemia and ASCVD Risk: Confusion, Controversy Consensus

nutrients ISSN

Simvastatin With or Without Ezetimibe in Familial Hypercholesterolemia

Supplementary Appendix

Approach to Dyslipidemia among diabetic patients

Inclisiran lowers LDL-C and PCSK9 irrespective of diabetes status without worsening glycemia

Lipids & Hypertension Update

Disclosure. This study was sponsored by Pfizer, Inc. All authors are employees of Pfizer, Inc. with ownership of stock in Pfizer, Inc.

Update on inclisiran Discussion of ORION-1 trial

Dyslipidemia Treatment in 2016 Novel Agents Combination Therapies Statin Intolerance

PCSK9 Inhibitors and Modulators

Review of guidelines for management of dyslipidemia in diabetic patients

Cholesterol targets and therapy Thomas C. Andrews, MD, FACC

What have We Learned in Dyslipidemia Management Since the Publication of the 2013 ACC/AHA Guideline?

Does IMPROVE-IT & FOURIER Confirm or Refute the LDL Hypothesis?

(For National Authority Use Only) Name of Study Drug: to Part of Dossier:

Best Lipid Treatments

Management of Dyslipidaemias: PCSK9 Inhibition. Alberico L. Catapano Professor President EAS University of Milano Italy

Mipomersen (ISIS ) Page 2 of 1979 Clinical Study Report ISIS CS3

Study 2 ( ) Pivotal Phase 3 Study Top-Line Results. October 29, 2018

PCSK9 Inhibitors Current Status

Problem patients in primary care Patient 4: Peripheral artery disease

Pamela B. Morris, MD, FACC, FAHA, FASPC, FNLA

Transcription:

A Phase 3 Double-blind, Randomized Study to Assess Safety and Efficacy of Evolocumab (AMG 145) in Hypercholesterolemic Subjects Unable to Tolerate an Effective Dose of Statin Erik Stroes 1, David Colquhoun 2, David Sullivan 3, Fernando Civeira 4, Robert S. Rosenson 5, Gerald F. Watts 6, Eric Bruckert 7, Leslie Cho 8, Ricardo Dent 9, Beat Knusel 9, Allen Xue 9, Rob Scott 9, Scott M. Wasserman 9, and Michael Rocco 8 for the GAUSS-2 Investigators 1 Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, Netherlands; 2 Wesley Medical Centre, Auchenflower, Australia; 3 Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Camperdown, Australia; 4 Hospital Universitario Miguel Servet, Zaragoza, Spain; 5 Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, NY, USA; 6 Royal Perth Hospital, School of Medicine and Pharmacology, University of Western Australia, Australia; 7 Hopital Pitié-Salpêtrière, Paris, France; 8 Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA; 9 Amgen, Thousand Oaks, CA, USA March 3, 214, Joint ACC/JAMA Late-breaking Clinical Trials Session 42 American College of Cardiology, Washington DC

Background and Rationale LDL-C lowering with statins reduces CV risk ~ 22% CV and ~1% mortality risk reduction for every 39 mg/dl LDL-C decrease 1 Statin side effects leading to partial/complete statin intolerance may be present in 1% 2% of patients in a real-life setting. 2,3 Statin discontinuation and low adherence have been shown to impact survival in both primary and secondary prevention. 4-6 Evolocumab, a fully human monoclonal antibody against PCSK9, is a novel therapeutic option for lowering LDL-C. In a phase II study, evolocumab reduced LDL-C in patients intolerant to at least one statin. 7 1. Lancet 21;376(9753):167-1681. 2. Can J Cardiol 211;27:635-62. 3. Ann Intern Med 213;158:526. 4. JAMA 27;297:177. 5. Eur Heart J 213;34:294-8. 6. Eur J Clin Pharm 29;65:113. 7. JAMA 212;38:2497-256. 2

The GAUSS-2 Study Goal Achievement after Utilizing an anti-pcsk9 antibody in Statin Intolerant Subjects (NCT176395) Design A 12-week randomized, double-blind, placebo- and ezetimibe-controlled multicenter phase 3 study 1 Objective To evaluate the efficacy and safety of evolocumab in statin-intolerant hypercholesterolemic patients 1. Clin Cardiol 214. In Press. 3

Randomization 2:2:1:1 End of Study GAUSS-2 Study Design Screening period Evolocumab 14 mg SC Q2W + Placebo PO QD N = 13 Fasting LDL-C 5 1 days before randomization Subcutaneous injection of placebo Evolocumab 42 mg SC QM + Placebo PO QD N = 12 Placebo SC Q2W + Ezetimibe 1 mg PO QD N = 51 Placebo SC QM + Ezetimibe 1 mg PO QD N = 51 Maximum 6 weeks Time point Day 1 Week 2 Week 4 Week 6 Week 8 Week 1 Week 12 Week 14 Evolocumab or Placebo SC Q2W Evolocumab or Placebo SC QM QM EOS Q2W EOS* *Phone call for AEs, SAEs. AEs, adverse events; EOS, end of study; LDL-C, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol; SAEs, serious adverse events; SC, subcutaneous; PO, oral; Q2W, every 2 weeks (biweekly); QM, monthly 4

GAUSS-2: Endpoints Co-primary endpoints Percent change from baseline in LDL-C at mean of weeks 1 and 12 and at week 12 Secondary endpoints At mean of weeks 1 and 12 and at week 12: Percent change from baseline in ApoB, ApoA-I, lipoprotein(a), TG, and HDL-C Achievement of LDL-C < 7 mg/dl Key safety endpoints Treatment-emergent and serious adverse events Muscle and hepatic enzyme elevations Anti-evolocumab antibodies 5

GAUSS-2: Baseline Characteristics PBO Q2W + EZE QD (N = 51) Biweekly Evolocumab 14 mg Q2W + PBO QD (N = 13) PBO QM + EZE QD (N = 51) Monthly Evolocumab 42 mg QM + PBO QD (N = 12) Age (years), mean (SD) 62 (1) 61 (1) 6 (9) 63 (1) Female, % 53 45 43 45 Race, white, % 96 91 9 96 NCEP risk categories*, % High 63 5 63 57 Moderately high 1 16 16 16 Moderate 18 19 16 16 Lower 1 16 6 12 *Risk category definitions: high, diagnosed CHD or risk equivalent; moderately high, 2 or more risk factors and Framingham risk score 1% 2%; moderate, 2 or more risk factors and Framingham risk score < 1%; lower, or 1 risk factor. EZE, ezetimibe; PBO, placebo; Q2W, biweekly; QM, monthly; QD, daily 6

GAUSS-2: Baseline Characteristics II Number of intolerable statins, % PBO Q2W + EZE QD (N = 51) Biweekly Evolocumab 14 mg Q2W + PBO QD (N = 13) PBO QM + EZE QD (N = 51) Monthly Evolocumab 42 mg QM + PBO QD (N = 12) 2 1 1 1 1 3 51 55 67 51 4 26 19 24 2 Worst muscle-related side effect*, % Myalgia 78 78 88 79 Myositis 22 19 8 19 Rhabdomyolysis 2 4 2 Lipid lowering therapy, % 29 33 31 36 Statin use, % 18 18 2 17 *Data missing for one patient in the evolocumab Q2W arm EZE, ezetimibe; PBO, placebo; Q2W, biweekly; QM, monthly; QD, daily 7

GAUSS-2: Baseline Lipids LDL-C*, mg/dl, mean (SD) ApoB, mg/dl, mean (SD) Lp(a), nmol/l, median (Q1,Q3) TG, mg/dl, median (Q1,Q3) PBO Q2W EZE QD (N = 51) Biweekly Evolocumab 14 mg Q2W + PBO QD (N = 13) PBO QM + EZE QD (N = 51) Monthly Evolocumab 42 mg QM + PBO QD (N = 12) 195 (64) 192 (57) 195 (52) 192 (61) 14 (37) 14 (32) 14 (31) 133 (32) 57 (22, 25) 17 (12, 243) 39 (1, 11) 165 (123, 224) 26 (7, 181) 168 (124, 24) 31 (9, 8) 139 (13, 19) *Determined by the Friedewald formula with reflexive testing via preparative ultracentrifugation when calculated LDL-C was <4 mg/dl or triglyceride levels were >4 mg/dl EZE, ezetimibe; PBO, placebo; Q2W, biweekly; QM, monthly; QD, daily; TG, triglycerides 8

Mean Percent Change in LDL-C from Baseline GAUSS-2: Evolocumab Primary Endpoint Biweekly Dose -2 18% -4-6 56% -8 Study drug administration Biweekly SC BL Day 1 Week 2 Week 4 Week 6 Week 8 Week 1 Week 12 Study Week 1: Ezetimibe (N = 51) 2: Evolocumab 14 mg Q2W (N = 13) BL, baseline. Vertical lines represent the standard error around the mean. Plot is based on observed data with no imputation for missing values. P value is multiplicity adjusted. 9

Mean Percent Change in LDL-C from Baseline GAUSS-2: Evolocumab Primary Endpoint Monthly Dose -2 15% -4-6 53% -8 Study drug administration Monthly SC BL Day 1 Week 2 Week 4 Week 6 Week 8 Week 1 Week 12 Study Week 1: Ezetimibe (N = 51) 2: Evolocumab 42 mg QM (N = 12) BL, baseline. Vertical lines represent the standard error around the mean. Plot is based on observed data with no imputation for missing values. P value is multiplicity adjusted. 1

GAUSS-2: LDL-C lowering efficacy Clinically equivalent between dosing groups Evolocumab Biweekly Treatment Difference vs Ezetimibe Evolocumab Monthly Treatment Difference vs Ezetimibe Average at weeks 1 and 12 37% At week 12 38% Average at weeks 1 and 12 39% At week 12 38% P <.1 P <.1 11

Treatment Difference, % Mean (SE) Treatment Difference, % Mean (SE) Treatment Difference, % Mean (SE) Treatment Difference, %, Mean (SE) Treatment Difference, % Mean (SE) GAUSS-2: Secondary Endpoints at Week 12 ApoB* -5-1 -15-2 -25-3 -35-4 -33% -33% HDL-C 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 4% 5% Lp(a)* -5-1 -15-2 -25 ApoA-I 7 6 5 4 3 4% 2% Triglycerides -3-35 -4 9 6 3-25% 2% -28% 2 1 Evolocumab 14 mg Q2W vs ezetimibe Evolocumab 42 mg QM vs ezetimibe -3-6 Treatment difference vs ezetimibe: *P <.1; P value adjusted for multiplicity. -9-12 -5% No notable difference in results for average at weeks 1 and 12 and week 12 12

Proportion of Patients Achieving LDL-C Target Goal at Week 12, n (%) GAUSS-2: LDL-C Goal Achievement at Week 12 1. 9. 8. 7. 6. 5. 12 (92%) 7 (7%) 29 (91%) 28 (8%) 36 (77%) 4 (76%) 4. 3. 2. 1.. (%) (%) Lower Risk < 16 mg/dl 3 (2%) 1 (8%) Moderately High Risk* < 13 mg/dl 2 (7%) 1 (4%) High Risk < 1 mg/dl Ezetimibe QD + PBO Q2W Ezetimibe QD + PBO QM Evolocumab 14 mg Q2W + PBO QD Evolocumab 42 mg QM + PBO QD *Combination of NCEP ATP III moderate and moderately-high risk categories Rate based on subjects with observed values at Week 12 and LDL-C above target goal at baseline 13

GAUSS-2: Safety and Tolerability Adverse Events (AEs), n(%) Ezetimibe (N = 12) Evolocumab (N = 25) Treatment-emergent AEs 74 (73) 135 (66) Common treatment-emergent AEs ( 5% of patients in either treatment arm) Headache Myalgia Extremity pain Muscle spasms Fatigue Nausea Diarrhea Paresthesia 9 (9) 18 (18) 1 (1) 4 (4) 1 (1) 7 (7) 7 (7) 5 (5) 16 (8) 16 (8) 14 (7) 13 (6) 9 (4) 9 (4) 5 (2) 2 (1) Serious AEs 4 (4) 6 (3) AEs leading to study drug discontinuation 13 (13) 17 (8) Deaths Potential injection site reactions * 8 (8) 6 (3) Muscle-related SMQ 23 (23) 25 (12) Neurocognitive AEs Anti-evolocumab antibodies - *Reported using high-level term grouping, including IS - rash, inflammation, pruritus, reaction, urticaria. Standard MedDRA Queries. Searched HLGT terms: Deliria (incl confusion); Cognitive and attention disorders and disturbances; dementia and amnestic conditions; disturbances in thinking and perception; mental impairment disorders. Binding or neutralizing; data missing for one patient. 14

GAUSS-2: Conclusions Evolocumab, administered biweekly (14 mg) or monthly (42 mg), yields a potent reduction in LDL-C after 12 weeks in patients with statin intolerance to at least 2 statins. LDL-C reductions are clinically equivalent with biweekly and monthly dosing regimens. Evolocumab biweekly (14 mg) or monthly (42 mg) is superior to ezetimibe in lowering LDL-C, ApoB, and Lp(a). Evolocumab is well tolerated with low rates of muscle symptoms in this 12-week study in patients intolerant to 2 statins due to musclerelated side effects. The LDL-C lowering efficacy combined with good tolerability make evolocumab a promising option to address the unmet clinical need in high-risk hypercholesterolemic patients with statin intolerance. 15

Anti-PCSK9 Antibody Effectively Lowers Cholesterol in Patients with Statin Intolerance: The GAUSS-2 Randomized, Placebo-controlled Phase 3 Clinical Trial of Evolocumab Erik Stroes, MD, PhD, David Colquhoun, MD, David Sullivan, MD, Fernando Civeira, MD, Robert S. Rosenson, MD, Gerald F. Watts, DSc, PhD, DM, Eric Bruckert, MD, Leslie Cho, MD, Ricardo Dent, MD, Beat Knusel, PhD, Allen Xue, PhD, Rob Scott, MD, Scott M. Wasserman, MD, Michael Rocco, MD for the GAUSS-2 Investigators JACC 214: online first. Available online at http://content.onlinejacc.org/ Thank you to our investigators and coordinators, data safety committee members, clinical endpoint committee members, core laboratories, operational teams, monitors, and sponsor