Institute of Agric ulture and Natural Resourc es Department of Plant Pathology

Similar documents
Institute of Agric ulture and Natural Resourc es Department of Plant Pathology

Funding for this research was provided by the Nebraska Soybean Board.

ABSTRACT: 67 SOYBEAN CYST NEMATODE RESISTANCE HOW IT ALL COMES TOGETHER IN THE MIDWESTERN UNITED STATES

Evaluation of Soybean Varieties Resistant to Soybean Cyst Nematode in Iowa 2009

2017 ILeVO Trial Harvest Report

Agronomy Notes Vol 30, No EARLY MATURING VARIETIES AND SOYBEAN CYST NEMATODES: WILL THIS MARRIAGE WORK?

Improving Management Of Soybean Cyst Nematode Through Extension Demonstration And Outreach

Loren Giesler, Nebraska Extension Plant Pathologist John Wilson, Nebraska Extension Educator Burt Co. Sclerotinia stem rot (White Mold)

A 2015 multi-site field study on the effects of seed treatment on soybean yield and Soybean Cyst Nematode reproduction

SOYBEAN CYST NEMATODE MANAGEMENT ADVANCED CROP ADVISORS

Institute of Ag Professionals

Institute of Ag Professionals

Soybean Cyst Nematode and other disease issues in soybean. Sam Markell, Ph.D. Extension Plant Pathologist North Dakota State University

SOIL PH IN RELATION TO BROWN STEM ROT AND SOYBEAN CYST NEMATODE N.C. Kurtzweil 1, C.R. Grau 2, A.E. MacGuidwin 3, J.M. Gaska 4, and A.W.

Breeding for SCN Resistance in the South

Brian Diers University of Illinois

RESPONSE OF DEKALB CORN PRODUCTS TO POPULATION

Soybean Cyst Nematode: a Continually Growing Problem in Soybeans?

Managing Soybean Cyst Nematode

2017 Meetings. ILeVO

Managing Soybean Cyst Nematode with the Soil Test and Crop Rotation

Cultivar Specific Nitrogen Management Profiles For Irrigated Process Varieties Inkster, ND 2009

2011 Early Season Foliar Fungicide Timing Trial on Corn

5/23 6/26 6/30 7/21 CONCLUSIONS

2017 Michigan Regional Trial

MANAGING MARESTAIL AND GIANT RAGWEED IN WHEAT

The soybean cyst nematode (SCN), Heterodera glycines, is the number one yield reducer for

2006- Foliar insecticide effects on soybean aphid and soybean yield. Summary Background Objective Site and application description

Efficacy of Selected Acaricides on Spider Mites in Corn 2011

Residual herbicides in Liberty Link soybeans at Rosemount, MN Treatment Date May 23 June 17 June 23 July 10

In mid-october, all plots were again soil sampled to determine residual nutrients.

DORIAN GATCHELL JANUARY 5, 2016 GRANITE FALLS, MN JANUARY 6, WATERTOWN, SD JANUARY 7, GRAND FORKS, ND

Soybean seed quality response among maturity groups to planting dates in the Midsouth. Larry C. Purcell & Montserrat Salmeron

INFLUENCE OF DAIRY MANURE APPLICATIONS ON CORN NUTRIENT UPTAKE

2018 Nebraska Dry Bean Variety Trials

Peanut Disease Control Field Trials 2015

Balance GT/Balance Bean/LL Systems in Soybeans at Rochester, MN Breitenbach, Fritz R., Lisa M. Behnken, Annette Kyllo and Matthew Bauer

INTRODUCTION AND BACKGROUND

Evaluating the Effectiveness of Iron Chelates in Managing Iron Deficiency Chlorosis in Grain Sorghum

WATERMELON RESPONSE TO COPPER AND A COMPLETE MICRONUTRIENT SOURCE1

2007 Powdery Mildew of Cantaloupe Fungicide Trial

2016 Soybean Update. A) Variety options for 2016

Peanut Disease Control Field Trials 2013

An IPM 1 Approach to Managing Herbicide Resistant Ryegrass in Northeast Texas. October, 2014 J. Swart, A. Braley, R. Sutton, S. Stewart, D.

Crop Disease Management Row Crop Short Course March 1 st, 2018

Management of Corky Ringspot Disease in Potato Using Vydate C-LV Irrigated Trial Rice, MN 2009

INSECTICIDE EFFICACY TRIAL FOR THRIPS CONTROL IN DRY BULB ONIONS

NEW YORK and VERMONT CORN SILAGE HYBRID TRIALS 2017

Quality and yield of Indian mustard genotypes as influenced by different fertility levels

ORGANIC ROMAINE HEARTS LATE SUMMER 2017 SALINAS, CA

Understanding a Soil Report

Fusarium root rot of soybean occurrence, impact, and relationship with soybean cyst nematode

Research. Plant Health Progress :

Wheat Update September 2017 ARKANSAS WHEAT PERFORMANCE TRIALS AND VARIETY SELECTION. Methods

THE IMPACT OF NITROGEN AND SILICON NUTRITION ON THE RESISTANCE OF SUGARCANE VARIETIES TO ELDANA SACCHARINA (LEPIDOPTERA: PYRALIDAE)

Response of Nitrogen, Phosphorus and Potassium Levels on Linseed (Linum usitatissimum L.)

AUTHORS MWANSA MUKUKA DR. CHISHALA BENSON H. DR. MUTITI SAMUEL DR. UCHIDA YOSHITAKA APPSA CONFERENCE 6 TH NOVEMBER, 2017

General Combining Ability of Sugar Beet Inbreds as Determined with Two Different Top Cross Testers

Objectives: 1. Determine the effect of nitrogen and potassium applications on sugar beet root yield and quality.

Nitrogen additives: What is what, and do they work?

Nutrient Content of Vegetable Amaranth (Amaranths cruentus L.) At Different Harvesting Stages

Weather conditions prior to POST I, II & III applications were favorable due to abundant moisture conditions and moderate temperatures.

RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN SDS AND SCN IN COMMERCIAL SOYBEAN FIELDS IN WISCONSIN 1. Introduction

Interpreting Soils Report. Beyond N P K

Shift in Virulence of Soybean Cyst Nematode is Associated with Use of Resistance from PI 88788

2016 Processing Onion Weed Control Trial

May 2008 AG/Soils/ pr Understanding Your Soil Test Report Grant E. Cardon Jan Kotuby-Amacher Pam Hole Rich Koenig General Information

Using silicon, Stimplex and plant resistance in pumpkin production systems to reduce plant disease loss

Foliar fungicide effects on soybean disease suppression, senescence and yield I.

Predicting NuSun Hybrid Oleic Acid Concentration Through Early Sampling. J. F. Miller, D. A. Rehder, and B. A. Vick

OBJECTIVES METHODS. Site Characteristics

MANAGING GIANT RAGWEED & MARESTAIL IN WHEAT

Influence of Stabilized Urea Nitrogen on Turfgrass Performance and Nitrogen Volatilization Bill Kreuser, Ph.D. University of Nebraska-Lincoln

Pest Management in Organic Soybeans-Paul Hunter and Wayne Wangness Farms-2002

In-depth studies initiated: Results:

M. S. ZUBER A. J. KEASTER N. G. WEIR C. F. STARK P. J. LOESCH, JR. January,1970

University of Georgia, Cooperative Extension Service

Methods and Materials:

Interpretation of Soil Tests for Environmental Considerations

Fertility Management for Corn on Corn Systems Kyle Freeman. The Mosaic Company

Murray State Theses and Dissertations

Evaluation of Assail for the Control of Early Season Cotton Aphids in Upland Cotton COOPERATIVE RESEARCH PROJECT 2001

INITIAL INVESTIGATIONS OF POOR SUGARBEET AREAS. D.W. Franzen, D.H. Hopkins, and Mohamed Khan North Dakota State University INTRODUCTION

Effect of Soybean Cyst Nematode on Fatty Acid Levels of Soybean Seed

Interpreting Plant Tissue and Soil Sample Analysis

EffectivenessofDifferentSpayTimingMethodsfortheControlofLepidopteronPestsinCotton

Processing Tomato Cultivar Trials Research Report 2006

Corn and soybean yield responses to micronutrients fertilization

Final 2013 Delaware Soybean Board Report

Protein and Yield Response to Nitrogen Fertilizer and Variation of Plant Tissue Analysis in Wheat

Managing transplant size and advancing field maturity of fresh tomatoes and peppers

Aphid Management on Head Lettuce Using Imidacloprid and Foliar Insecticides

THE RIGHT SEEDS. THE RIGHT PROTECTION.

Effect of Plant Height on Fusarium Head Blight in Spring Wheat

Phytotoxicity and Efficacy of Fascination (6-Benzyl Adenine + Gibberellic Acid) for Enhanced Branching of Dead Nettle (Lamium maculatum Shell Pink )

2008 PMR REPORT #ESOYSMI4 SECTION E: CEREAL, FORAGE CROPS, and OILSEEDS Insect Pests

Project Title: Evaluating the Distribution and Potential Impacts of Soybean Vein Necrosis Virus in Delaware

PLANT-DRIVEN IRRIGATION FROM THE GROUND UP.

2001 Annual and Perennial Ryegrass Report

Treatment Date May 27 June 16 July 13 July 21 Application preemergence early post sequential sequential

Transcription:

2015 Evaluation of SCN Resistant Soybean Varieties in Nebraska Loren J. Giesler, Extension Plant Pathologist Nicholas Arneson, Extension Technologist Kyle Broderick, Extension Technologist John Wilson, Extension Educator Burt County Institute of Agric ulture and Natural Resourc es Soybean cyst nematode (SCN) is the pest that causes the single largest loss to soybean producers in both Nebraska and the U.S. each year. Chemical treatment to the soil and/or soybean seed to control SCN has not achieved consistent economic success. Resistant varieties are the most effective way to maintain high yields in SCN-infested soybean fields. This report summarizes soybean variety testing from three SCN-infested locations in Nebraska. All of the soybean varieties in these tests were resistant to SCN with the exception of five susceptible "standards." The majority of varieties have the PI 88788 source of SCN resistance. However, additional varieties with Peking resistance were also included in the trials. The three locations used for testing were all on producers' fields located throughout Nebraska. Sites near the towns of Columbus, Plattsmouth, and West Point were selected based on geographical location in the state and adequately high populations of SCN (Figure 1). A non-infested control site was also planted near Mead at the Agricultural Research and Development Center (ARDC) to test SCN resistant soybean variety yields in the absence of SCN. All entries in the trial were replicated 4 times at each location. Each individual plot was 4 rows (10 feet) wide by 17 feet long. The spacing between rows was 30 in. Soil samples were collected from each plot in the spring shortly after soybean emergence. These samples were then processed in the lab to determine the number of SCN eggs per 100 cc s soil. These spring samples established the initial SCN count for each plot. Soil sampling was repeated in the fall following harvest to determine the final SCN population density. By comparing the final (fall) SCN population to the initial (spring) population a Reproduction Factor (Rf) was calculated. The Rf is calculated by dividing the final SCN count (plus minimum detectable level) by the initial SCN count (plus minimum detectable level).this number will indicate how much the population increased or decreased during the growing season. An Rf of 1.0 means there was no change in the SCN population. Any RF value above 1 indicates the population increased, and any value below 1 means it decreased. The graphs below, which report soybean yield (bu/a) and SCN reproduction (Rf), indicate SCN reproduction in terms of the Rf.

Columbus The Columbus site was located in a center pivot irrigated field with loamy sand soils. The soil ph was 6.2 (Table 1). Soil organic matter (OM) was 1.3 % (Table 1). Rainfall totaled 23.3 inches throughout the growing season. Columbus had the highest initial SCN population with an average of 3,912 eggs per 100 cc s soil (Table 1). Varieties with PI 88788 resistance were effective, allowing an average Rf of 0.61. Varieties with Peking resistance had an average Rf of 0.43. NK 26 P3 exhibited the best control with an RF of 0.24. The average Rf for susceptible varieties was 1.9. Yields were fair at this location with the highest being Asgrow 2935 with 88788 resistance which yielded 57.6 bu/a. The lowest yielding variety was LG C2605R2 an SCN susceptible variety which yielded 34.6 bu/a. The overall average yield for this location was 49.8 bu/a. The average of varieties with 88788 resistance was 50.4 bu/a, while the average yield with Peking resistance was 55.7 bu/a. The average susceptible yield was 42.3 bu/a. There was statistical variance exhibited between yields producing an LSD (P = 0.10) of 9.97. Plattsmouth The Plattsmouth site was located in a non-irrigated field with silt loam soils. The soil ph was 5.3 (Table 1). Soil organic matter (OM) was 4.0 % (Table 1). Rainfall totaled 29.2 inches throughout the growing season. Plattsmouth had the lowest initial SCN population with an average of 154 eggs/100 cc s soil (Table 1). Varieties with PI 88788 resistance were not very effective, allowing an average Rf of 1.65. Varieties with Peking resistance had an average Rf of 1.54. Nutech 7240 exhibited the best control with an RF of 0.5. The average Rf for susceptible varieties was 4.5. Yields were good with the highest being Channel 3008R2 with 88788 resistance which yielded 76.1 bu/a. The lowest yielding variety was NK 32L8 with 88788 resistance which yielded 60.4 bu/a. The overall average yield for this location was 67.0 bu/a. The average of varieties with 88788 resistance was 67.0 bu/a, while the average yield with Peking resistance was 65.3 bu/a. The average susceptible yield was 68.3 bu/a. There was statistical variance exhibited between yields producing an LSD (P = 0.10) of 7.1. West Point The West Point site was located in a center pivot irrigated field with sandy loam soils. The soil ph was 6.5 (Table 1). Soil organic matter (OM) was 2.1 % (Table 1). Rainfall totaled 20.3 inches. West Point had the intermediate initial SCN population with an average of 500 eggs per 100 cc s soil (Table 1). Varieties with PI 88788 resistance were not effective, allowing an average Rf of 2.20. Varieties with Peking resistance had an average Rf of 2.94. Mycogen 5N275R2 exhibited the best control with an RF of 0.34. The average Rf for susceptible varieties was 6.96. Yields were fair with the highest yield being Asgrow 2935 with 88788 resistance which yielded 64.4 bu/a. The lowest yielding variety was Producers 2408NR2 an SCN susceptible variety with 44.0 bu/a. The overall average yield for this location was 57.1 bu/a. The average of varieties with 88788 resistance was 58.4 bu/a, while the average yield with

Peking resistance was 54.2 bu/a. The average susceptible yield was 50.9 bu/a. There was statistical variance exhibited between yields producing an LSD (P = 0.10) of 5.9. Statistics A statistical analysis was performed on the yield (bu/a) at each location. LSD's were calculated at the 90% confidence level. An LSD (Least Significant Difference) indicates how much difference there has to be between two entries before they are considered statistically different from each other and not due to natural variations in the test data. The 90% confidence level means there is a 90% probability the difference between two yields or reproductive factors is significant and only a 10% chance the difference was due to random variability. Lower confidence levels will result in smaller differences required for significance, while higher confidence levels will make the LSDs larger. The LSDs in the charts below are intended to help visualize differences between varieties. Table 1: Miscellaneous trial information. Location Soil Texture M ph OM¹ (%) Average Spring SCN Population All Plots (eggs/100 cc s soil) HG Type 2 Planting Date Harvest Date Columbus Loamy Sand 6.2 1.3 3,912 2.5.7 5/22/2015 10/20/2015 Plattsmouth Silt Loam 5.3 4.0 154 2.5.7 6/08/2015 10/26/2015 West Point Sandy Loam 6.5 2.1 500 7 5/18/2015 10/13/2015 ¹OM = Organic Matter (%) 2 See explanation of HG Type in Table 2

Table 2: HG Types and sources of resistance. (ie, if SCN is HG type 1 then it will reproduce on soybeans with Peking resistance, if SCN is HG type 1.2 then it will reproduce on soybeans with Peking or PI 88788 resistance. If a number is not listed in the HG type, that source of resistance held SCN reproduction to 10% or less of the reproduction that occurred on a standard susceptible variety.) HG Type Source of Resistance 1 PI 548402 (Peking) 2 PI 88788 3 PI 90763 4 PI 437654 5 PI 209332 6 PI 89772 7 PI 5484316 (Cloud)

Figure 1. Locations of UNL SCN-resistant Soybean Variety Trial Program experiments in 2015.

Columbus, NE SCN Plot Results Asgrow AG 2935 Mycogen 5N256R2 Stine 30RE02 Mycogen 5N275R2 Channel 2808R2 NK 29 G4 Mycogen 5N292R2 Hoegemeyer 3220NRR NK 28 A2 Asgrow AG 3034 Hefty H28R4 Hoegemeyer 3080NRR Hoegemeyer 3422NRR LG C3070R2 LG C3321R2 Producers 2900NR2 Stine 31RF02 Channel 3008R2 NK 32 L8 Channel 2607R2 LG C2890R2 NK 35A5 Channel 3308R2 NK 34 N3 NK 26 P3 Asgrow AG 3432 Stine 28RB02 Channel 2402R2 Stine 32RF02 Asgrow AG 3231 Hefty H32R5 Hefty H30R6 Hoegemeyer 2913NRR Hoegemeyer 2511NRR Nutech 7240 Producers 2408NR2 NK 24K2 Asgrow AG 2431 Mycogen 5B252R2 LG C2605R2 PI 88788 Peking Susceptible 0 1 2 3 4 5 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 SCN Reproduction (RF) Yield (bu/a) LSD = 0.88 (90% confidence) LSD = 9.97 (90% confidence) -Average initial SCN population density 3,912 eggs per 100 cc soil with HG Type 2.5.7. -RF 1.0 = No change in SCN population density over growing season.

Plattsmouth, NE SCN Plot Results Channel 3008R2 Stine 32RF02 Asgrow AG 3432 Channel 2808R2 Hoegemeyer 3422NRR LG C3070R2 Asgrow AG 3034 Mycogen 5N256R2 NK 35 A5 Stine 31RF02 Stine 28RB02 NK 26 P3 LG C3321R2 Asgrow AG 2935 LG C2890R2 Channel 3308R2 Channel 2607R2 Asgrow AG 3231 Stine 30RE02 Mycogen 5N275R2 Hoegemeyer 3080NRR NK 28 A2 Producers 2900NR2 NK 34 N3 NK 29 G4 Channel 2402R2 Hefty H30R6 Hefty H28R4 Mycogen 5N292R2 Hefty H32R5 Hoegemeyer 3220NRR NK 32 L8 Hoegemeyer 2511NRR Nutech 7240 Hoegemeyer 2913NRR NK 24 K2 Asgrow AG 2431 Producers 2408NR2 LG C2605R2 Mycogen 5B252R2 PI 88788 Peking Susceptible 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 55 60 65 70 75 80 SCN Reproduction (RF LSD = 2.8 (90% confidence) Yield (bu/a) LSD = 7.1 (90% confidence) -Average initial SCN population density 154 eggs per 100 cc soil with HG Type 2.5.7. -RF 1.0 = No change in SCN population density over growing season.

West Point, NE SCN Plot Results Asgrow AG 2935 Stine 32RF02 Channel 3008R2 Stine 28RE02 NK 32L8 NK 26P3 Channel 3308R2 Asgrow AG 3034 Channel 2808R2 Asgrow AG 3432 Hoegemeyer 3080NRR LG C3070R2 Mycogen 5N275R2 LG C3321R2 Channel 2607R2 Hefty H28R4 NK 28A2 Stine 31RF02 NK 35A5 Stine 30RE02 Mycogen 5N256R2 Channel L 2402R2 Mycogen 5N292R2 Hefty H30R6 Hefty H32R5 Producers 2900NR2 Hoegemeyer 3220NRR Hoegemeyer 3422NRR LG C2890R2 NK 34N3 NK 29G4 Asgrow AG 3231 Hoegemeyer 2913NRR Nutech 7240 LG C2605R2 Mycogen 5B252R2 Asgrow AG 2431 NK 24K2 Producers 2408NR2 PI 88788 Peking Susceptible 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 40 45 50 55 60 65 SCN Reproduction (RF) LSD = 0.37 (90% confidence) Yield (bu/a) LSD = 5.9 (90% confidence) -Average initial SCN population density 500 eggs per 100 cc soil with HG Type 7. -RF 1.0 = No change in SCN population density over growing season.

Mead, NE Non-Infested SCN Plots Channel 2808R2 Stine 32RF02 Channel L 2402R2 LG C3321R2 NK 34N3 Stine 30RE02 Asgrow AG 3432 Hefty H32R5 LG C2890R2 LG C3070R2 Channel 3308R2 Channel 2607R2 Asgrow AG 3231 Mycogen 5N292R2 Producers 2900NR2 Hoegemeyer 3220NRR Hoegemeyer 3422NRR Mycogen 5N275R2 NK 28A2 Hoegemeyer 3080NRR Asgrow AG 3034 Asgrow AG 2935 NK 29G4 Stine 28RE02 NK 26P3 Hefty H28R4 Channel 3008R2 Stine 31RF02 NK 35A5 NK 32L8 Mycogen 5N256R2 Hefty H30R6 Hoegemeyer 2511NRR Nutech 7240 Hoegemeyer 2913NRR Mycogen 5B252R2 Asgrow AG 2431 LG C2605R2 NK 24K2 Producers 2408NR2 PI 88788 Peking Susceptible 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 Yield (bu/a) LSD = 8.0 (90% confidence)