CHARACTERISTICS OF MOTOR ABILITIES OF YOUNG ATHLETES OF SELECTED SPORTS DURING SPORT TRAINING

Similar documents
THE LEVEL OF CHOSEN MOTOR ABILITIES OF 13 YEARS OLD SOCCER PLAYERS

Influence of karate exercises on motor development in pre-school children

HYPOTHESISED AND ACTUAL CHANGES IN THE GENERAL MOTOR PARAMETERS OF FIELD HOCKEY PLAYERS DURING THE TRAINING CYCLE

TALENT SELECTION PROCEDURES

RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN PLAYING ABILITY AND SELECTED MOTOR FITNESS VARIABLES OF TRIBAL WOMEN BASKETBALL PLAYERS

Pol. J. Sport Tourism 2015, 22, DOI: /pjst

From a talent detection system to talent selection. FIBA U14 Get Together Johan Pion Antwerpen (Belgium) October 20th 2018

Why Movement Experiences at U6 Impact a Soccer Career

NATIONAL UNIVERSITY OF PHYSICAL EDUCATION AND SPORTS - BUCHAREST DOCTORAL SCHOOL ABSTRACT OF DOCTORAL THESIS

THE IMPORTANCE OF PHYSICAL TRAINING IN TEAM SPORTS

No 32 ANTROPOMOTORYKA 2005

Health and Exercise Science Courses-1

THE EFFECT OF PLYOMETRIC TRAINING ON STRENGTH - SPEED ABILITIES OF BASKETBALL PLAYERS

Periodization in Team Sport Games - A Review of Current Knowledge and Modern Trends in Competitive Sports

BASIC AND SPECIAL PHYSICAL PREPARATION OF TOP TABLE TENNIS PLAYERS

SOUTH AFRICAN HOCKEY ASSOCIATION LONG TERM PARTICIPANTS DEVELOPMENT (LTPD) SUMMARY GUIDE

Readiness for Soccer

Changes in Aerobic and Anaerobic Power Indices in Elite Handball Players Following a 4 Week General Fitness Mesocycle

A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF THE COMPONENTS OF MOTOR FITNESS IN MALE KABADDI AND KHOKHO PLAYERS

Coaching without these age-appropriate needs in mind may lead to short-term success, but will undermine the athlete's long-term potential.

Chapter I. Introduction

Content Area: Physical Education Grade Level Expectations: Fifth Grade Standard: 1. Movement Competence & Understanding in Physical Education

Phys. Ed. Block Plan 2018 Unit 1: Volleyball Week 2 Week 5 02/21-03/16

K-5 PHYSICAL EDUCATION Standards/Benchmarks/Grade Level Expectations (GLE)

THE YOUTH PHYSICAL DEVELOPMENT MODEL: A New Approach to Long Term Athletic Development

COMPARATIVE STUDY OF CO ORDINATIVE ABILITIES AMONG DIFFERENT GAME PLAYERS

ULTIMATE CANADA Long-term Athlete Development Model

PHYSICAL EDUCATION CURRICULUM. Kindergarten

Why Do Kids Play Soccer? Why Do You Coach Soccer?

THE ABILITY TO MAINTAIN STATIC BALANCE IN COMPETITORS OF CYCLIC SPORTS AT THE STAGE OF DIRECTED TRAINING

PE Assessment Point 2 Revision booklet

APPLICATION OF NEURAL NETWORKS IN OPTIMIZATION OF THE RECRUITMENT PROCESS FOR SPORT SWIMMING 1. INTRODUCTION

Wellness to World Cup

COORDINATIVE AND PERFORMANCE CAPABILITIES LEVEL TO BADMINTON JUNIORS

Constructing Norms for selected Physical Fitness Test Battery as a Gauge for Sports Potential among Kabaddi Players

Competitive Anxiety and Coping Strategies in Young Martial Arts and Track and Field Athletes

Callanetics as one of the factors in motor abilities development in women

PARTICIPATION AND PERFORMANCES IN COMPETITIONS: LATVIAN ORIENTEERING DEVELOPMENT EVIDENCE

ABSTRACT. Address for correspondence: Alaa Ibrahim Jasim, Ministry of Education, Diala Education Directorate.

The Basis of Modern Training Process Periodization in High-Performance Athletes for Year Preparation

different dance form from among folk, social,

THEORY OF FIRST TERM. PHYSICAL EDUCATION: 3rd E.S.O.

Essential Learner Outcomes (ELOs) for Kindergarten

The Impact of Mental Training Program to Advance Shooting Performance Level of Basketball Juniors

NATIONAL STRENGTH AND CONDITIONING ASSOCIATION (Position Statement on Long-Term Athletic Development)

Klimczyk Mariusz, Klimczyk Agata.,

GROWING RUGBY PLAYERS

HADDONFIELD PUBLIC SCHOOLS Curriculum Map for (Physical Education 6 th 8 th Grades) PHYSICAL FITNESS

INTERREACTIONS OF PERIPHERAL PERCEPTION AND ABILITY OF TIME-MOVEMENT ANTICIPATION IN HIGH CLASS COMPETITIVE BADMINTON PLAYERS

Geneva CUSD 304 Content-Area Curriculum Frameworks Grades 6-12 Physical Education & Health

Analysis of Agility of Netball Players among Different Age Groups

HEALTH AND PHYSICAL EDUCATION DEPARTMENT

Wellness to World Cup

REVIEW OF RELATED LITERATURE

Team Games: Volleyball / Team Handball / Floor Hockey / Cardio-Fitness (#0054)

ABSTRACT OF THE DOCTORAL THESIS BY CHEPEA I. ION BOGDAN THESIS ADVISER: PHD PROFESSOR DORINA ORŢĂNESCU TITLE OF THE THESIS:

Review of the textbook by W.N. Platonov: System of athlete's preparation in Olympic sport. General theory and practical implications (Volume I)

Published by Verkhoshansky SSTM 2011 Rome, Italy

TRAINING IN SPORTS. Key Points :

FACULTY OF PHYSICAL EDUCATION: Ph.D. PHY. EDU Syllabus for Ph.D. Entrance Test

Faculty of Physical Education & Sport Sciences, Diala University. Seif El Din Watheq :

OPTIMIZATION OF HANDBALL TRAINING AT JUNIOR LEVEL THROUGH COMPLEMENTARY MEANS OF PREPARATION

Students will know. basic dance and rhythm movements.

Inspiring Athleticism in Children and Youth. By Peter Twist. IDEA World 2011

International School of Turin

Research on the Mobile Capability of Basketball Players' Gait Based on SPSS Software

MEASUREMENT OF MOTOR FITNESS OF STUDENTS USING THE ROWING ERGOMETER

Grade Level Outcomes for Elementary School (4 5)

No 29 ANTROPOMOTORYKA 2005

Physical Education Department COURSE Outline:

THE IMPORTANCE OF COORDINATIVE ABILITIES IN ACHIEVING ATHLETIC PERFORMANCE

Fairview South District 72 Physical Education Curriculum

THE EFFECT OF METHYLPHENIDATE TREATMENT ON EXERCISE PERFORMANCE IN CHILDREN WITH ATTENTION-DEFICIT HYPERACTIVITY DISORDER

Published by Verkhoshansky SSTM 2011 Rome, Italy

PHYSICAL EDUCATION (PE)

Capt. Jason O. West, MS, CSCS Clinical Associate Professor Kinesiology & Rehabilitative Sciences University of Tulsa Oklahoma State Director National

CURRENT UNIT Basketball

Muscle Strength and Power of Elite Female and Male Swimmers

AGES 16 / 18 AND UNDER Age Appropriate Strength and Conditioning LESSON WORKBOOK DARRYL NELSON

Sevenoaks Sports Camps. Easter holidays and May half term 2018

SOUTH AFRICAN HOCKEY ASSOCIATION LONG TERM PARTICIPANTS DEVELOPMENT (LTPD) PARENTAL GUIDE

Physical Education Georgia Standards of Excellence PHYSICAL EDUCATION. Georgia Standards of Excellence (GSE) Grade 9 Grade 12

St. John s Lutheran School Physical Education Curriculum

I. PHILOSOPHY AND GOALS

STRENGTH CHARACTERISTICS OF TEAM HANDBALL PLAY;::RS

JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL ACADEMIC RESEARCH FOR MULTIDISCIPLINARY Impact Factor 2.417, ISSN: , Volume 4, Issue 1, February 2016

Personality traits of wheelchair basketball players

A Methodology for Developing Speed and Endurance of Teenagers

Physical Education K-5 Essential Learning for Physical Education

REVIEW ARTICLE IMPROVING ATTENTIONAL PROCESSES IN SPORT: DEFINING ATTENTION, ATTENTIONAL SKILLS AND ATTENTION TYPES

ABSTRACT OF THE DOCTORAL THESIS BY MS. ANASTASIA TSOUROUFLI

COMPARISON OF CIRCUIT TRAINING METHODS ON PERFORMANCE VARIABLES OF SC/ST NON-SC/ST BOYS

Theory of training in handball between claim and reality

Subject: Physical Ed. Calendar :1 st 9 weeks Timeframe: 42 days Level/Grade:

We see sport and physical activity as something all Canadians can do to promote wellness and the health of our communities.

Dr Nimeshkumar D. Chaudhari

Curriculum Map Physical Education Grades: Kindergarten 2 nd

MULTI-SPORTS academy ACADEMY GUIDE

Phys. Ed. Block Plan 2018 Unit 1: Basic Games and Jump Rope Week 2 Week 5 02/21-03/16

Transcription:

Characteristics of motor abilities of young athletes of selected sports during sport training STUDIES IN PHYSICAL CULTURE AND TOURISM Vol. 17, No. 1, 2010 KRZYSZTOF KARPOWICZ, RYSZARD STRZELCZYK Department of Theory of Sport, University School of Physical Education, Poznań, Poland CHARACTERISTICS OF MOTOR ABILITIES OF YOUNG ATHLETES OF SELECTED SPORTS DURING SPORT TRAINING Key words: sport of children and adolescents, sport disciplines, testing, general fitness. ABSTRACT The goal of the present study was to determine the structure of motor preparation of young athletes of selected sports in the context of their sport-specific training. The research material comprised results of investigations carried out among members of the Wielkopolska Province junior sport teams (canoeing, cycling, basketball, athletics, handball, volleyball, triathlon, rugby, rowing). The study encompassed 300 boys aged 15-16. The International Physical Fitness Tests and trials determining selected components of general physical preparation were used as the basic research tools. The study revealed that the structure of motor ability and its level often indicate premature effects of sport specialization, at the expense of comprehensive, well-balanced motor preparation. INTRODUCTION Sport training of children and adolescents is one of the most important period determining practicing of a given sport by adult competitors in the future. General physical preparation essentially affects coaching efficiency and improvement of technical skills and has a considerable impact on the tactics and current psychological predispositions of athletes [2, 11, 14, 16]. The type and level of general physical preparation is determined by cumulative effects of development of individual motor abilities. This does not mean a simple total of values but a specific functional model conditioned by the requirements of competitive exertion and development principles [2, 4, 13]. Competitive exertion typically imposes specific requirements, not only on one s motor potential (physical preparation) but also on one s abilities to perform particular movements (particular sport techniques) and on the whole range of personality traits, with motivation as the most important one [1]. Therefore, technical preparation is a process oriented towards learning and improving sport abilities which allow athletes to show their motor potential in complex conditions of sport competition. This mainly depends on the level of motor abilities and skills [10, 12]. Manifestation of technical skills is connected with the level of motor abilities. It is difficult to explicitly state whether it is possible to separate in tests one s advanced movement technique from motor predispositions [5, 17, 20]. Thus, while using a variety of tests for evaluation of technical preparation, one should take into consideration that what is tested are in fact sport-specific skills are, e.g. basketball educationalists would refer to them as game Correspondence should be addressed to: Krzysztof Karpowicz, Department of Sport Theory, University School of Physical Education, ul. Królowej Jadwigi 27/39, 61-871 Poznań, tel.: +48 61 8355262, 604 411066, fax: +48 61 8355260, e-mail: karpowicz@awf.poznan.pl 33

Krzysztof Karpowicz, Ryszard Strzelczyk elements such as dribbling, catching, passing the ball. The model of motor preparation for children and adolescents has undergone essential transitions in the past decades. The main factors determining changes in motor concepts included development of knowledge of functional adaptation of the human body to physical exercise and motor development in ontogenesis. Technological requirements imposed on the body have also a great impact on different sports [6, 7, 11, 12]. Modern science and sport practice point to the need of verification of training methodology in the early stages of sport development. The stage of comprehensive physical preparation, promoted until recently, seems to be outdated due to nonspecific effects of training stimuli (in general), specificity of development of individual abilities and inconsistency with the natural dynamics of organic changes. Training exercises never affect the body in general, but always involve particular motor mechanisms, leading to specific rather than general adaptive changes [3, 11]. The abovementioned considerations evoke the question of what relationships should occur between the principle of comprehensive development and sport training specificity. It seems that in many cases, the principle of comprehensiveness is treated marginally since the problems which arise among trainers include focusing on development of individual motor abilities and relatively low efficiency of comprehensive measures. It is easier to employ the principle of specificity, which is mainly perceived as specialized training. All the same, a reference system should comprise training stages and their assumptions about implementation of training tasks, which would determine the relationships between comprehensiveness and specificity of training [8, 17]. In this context, consistent attempts should be made to assign multidimensional stage-related goals, specific for the assumed relationships between individual (biological) development and the area of additional (program-based) sport physical activity. The question is whether this concept can be empirically verified allowing for creation of at least general rational premises for long-term planning of athletes careers? The aim of the present study was to determine the structure of motor preparation of young athletes of selected sports in the context of stage tasks of sport-specific training, whose main objective is to develop recognized predispositions and to profile motor potential as a functional basis for forecasting of sport specialization. METHODS The research material comprised the results of studies carried out in June and October 2008 among members of the Wielkopolskie Province junior sport teams (canoeing, cycling, basketball, athletics, handball, volleyball, triathlon, rugby, rowing). The study encompassing 300 boys aged 15-16 focused on the evaluation of the their structure of motor abilities. The following research tools were employed: International Physical Fitness Test [9]: run, run, standing broad jump, hand grip, sits-ups, pull-ups; flexibility and agility; 4x10 m shuttle run; trials determining selected elements of general physical preparation [19]: run, simple movement time, time of simple response to visual stimuli, jump and reach, medicine ball throw, maximal strength in static conditions, Master s two-step test, eight shaped run, Dufour apparatus. RESULTS The results have been subjected to normalization of arithmetic means and standard deviations for all respondents and were presented in the graphic form, illustrating physical fitness profiles in the studied sport teams (Figure 1-9). DISCUSSION In many sports a great amount of training time is spent on improvement of technique and tactics. The development of motor skills (abilities) is typically attained as a side effect of specific training. However, the level of general fitness lays a foundation for development of technique and tactics, thus separate training is needed to improve motor abilities [18]. An adequately high level of comprehensive physical fitness comprises the basis for efficiency of sport activities. This is clearly reflected by the division of the training process into stages. 34

Characteristics of motor abilities of young athletes of selected sports during sport training E ffic ienc y P ower s urg es Figure 1. Canoeing normalized results Pull up Simple movement Figure 2. Cycling normalized results 35

Krzysztof Karpowicz, Ryszard Strzelczyk Sit ups Figure 3. Basketball normalized results Pull up Simple movement Power s urg es Figure 4. Athletics normalized results 36

Characteristics of motor abilities of young athletes of selected sports during sport training Standing long jump Pull up Sit ups Figure 5. Handball normalized results Figure 6. Volleyball normalized results 37

Krzysztof Karpowicz, Ryszard Strzelczyk Figure 7. Rugby normalized results Sit ups E ffic ienc y Figure 8. Triathlon normalized results 38

Characteristics of motor abilities of young athletes of selected sports during sport training Standing long jump Sit ups Power s urg es R elative s treng ht Figure 9. Rowing normalized results The goals of training at the stage of specific preparation include sport-oriented development of physical fitness, formation and recognition of special interests and predispositions, profiling motor potential as a functional basis for the forecast sport specialization and also equipping the trainee with considerable resources of motor skills [2, 15]. This period is specific and converges with high body sensitiveness to external stimuli. It is impossible to develop skills in young people through training based on the methods used among adults, neglecting the postulate of comprehensiveness which ensures long-term sport development as it involves exceeding of adaptive capabilities. From the biological standpoint, the used training loads must be adapted to the trainee s developmental age. It is remarkable that if the employed training load is not based on the principle of individualization (whose main postulate is choosing training loads adequately to competitor s abilities) its advantageous impact is weakened and, if used systematically, it can cause developmental disorders and becomes a traumatogenic factor leading to overtraining and exhaustion. Therefore, excessive (specific) exercise regimes imposed at a young age can not be justified. Although the use of such stimuli leads to quick adaptation to them, the adaptation mechanisms in the growing body are depleted which, in consequence, may lead to the premature departure of talented individuals from sport due to numerous injuries [3, 8, 15]. The realization of the sport training process among children and adolescents must take into consideration developmental factors. They determine, along with sport goals, selection of content, methods and direction of actions [4, 14]. The essence of the problem consists in formation of such a model of training and competitiveness which would bring temporary benefits in terms of motor preparation and also optimal effects of target impact. The obtained study results show that the structure of motor abilities and their level often indicate premature effects of sport specialization, at the cost of comprehensive, well-balanced motor preparation. This might suggest that the applied training loads were not of progressive character but merely oriented towards realization of current sport-related goals. On the other hand, such a specialization might result from purposefully chosen selection criteria in particular sports. 39

Krzysztof Karpowicz, Ryszard Strzelczyk REFERENCES [1] Bompa T.O., Theory and methodology of training. Dubuge. Iowa 1983. [2] Fraser-Thomas J.L., Cote J., Deakin J., Youth sport programs: avenue to foster positive youth development. Physical Education and Sport Pedagogy, 2005, vol. 10, 1:19-41. [3] Hirtz P., Starosta W., Sensitive and critical periods of motor coordination development and its relation to motor learning. Journal of Human Kinetics, 2002, 7:19-28. [4] Malina R., Bouchard C., Growth, maturation and physical activity. H.K.P. Champaign 1991. [5] Mc Dougall J.D., Physiological testing of the High- Performance Athlete. Canadian Association of Sport Sciences, Toronto 1982. [6] Mynarski W., Przegląd koncepcji struktualizacji koordynacyjnego potencjału motorycznego. Implikacje dla diagnostyki motorycznej (Overview of the concepts of structuralization of coordination motor potential. Implications for diagnostics of motor abilities), Antropomotoryka, 2003, 25:71-79. [7] Mynarski W., Żywicka A., Empiryczny model koordynacyjnych uwarunkowań motoryczności człowieka (Empirical model of coordination conditions in human motor activity), AWF, Katowice 2004. [8] Naglak Z., Struktura czasowa szkolenia zawodników specjalizujących się w zespołowych grach sportowych (Temporal structure of team players training) (in:) I. Ryguła (ed.) Czynniki warunkujące efektywność walki sportowej w koszykówce (Conditions of sports competition in basketball), AWF, Katowice 1995, pp. 19-36. [9] Pilicz S., Charzewski J. (ed.), Punktacja sprawności fizycznej młodzieży polskiej wg Międzynarodowego Testu Sprawności Fizycznej. Kryteria pomiaru wydolności organizmu testem Coopera (Point scale for physical fitness among Polish youth according to the International Physical Fitness Test. Criteria for physical fitness measurement by the Cooper test), AWF, Warszawa 2004. [10] Prus G., Kształtowanie sprawności specjalnej (Formation of specific fitness) (in:) I. Ryguła (ed.), Elementy teorii, metodyki, diagnostyki i optymalizacji treningu sportowego (Elements of theory, methodology, diagnostics and optimization in sports training), AWF, Katowice 2000, pp. 283-332. [11] Raczek J., Koncepcja przygotowania sprawnościowego dzieci i młodzieży (The concept of physical preparation of children and adolescents), Rocznik Naukowy AWF, Katowice 1985. [12] Ryguła I., Proces badawczy w naukach o sporcie (Research processes in sports sciences), AWF, Katowice 2003. [13] Schmidt R.A., Lee T.D., Motor control and learning. A behavioral emphasis. Human Kinetics, Champaign 1999. [14] Sozański H. (ed.), Teoretyczne podstawy kształtowania sprawności fizycznej w procesie szkolenia sportowego dzieci i młodzieży (Theoretical fundamentals of development of physical fitness in sports training for children and adolescents) AWF, Warszawa 1985. [15] Sozański H., Szkolenie sportowe dzieci i młodzieży (Sports training for children and young people), RCM-SKFiS, Warszawa 1987. [16] Starosta W., Wybrane biospołeczne uwarunkowania efektywności treningu sportowego dzieci i młodzieży (Selected biosocial conditionings for efficiency of sports training for children and young people), (in:) J. Bergier (ed.), Sport dzieci i młodzieży na przełomie wieków (Sport for children and young people at the turn of the century), IWFiS, Biała Podlaska 2000, pp. 143-162. [17] Thomas J.R., Nelson J.K., Research methods in physical activity. Human Kinetics, Champaign 1996. [18] Wachowski E., Strzelczyk R., Atuty cech motorycznych (Assets of motor abilities), Trening, 1991, 1. [19] Wachowski E., Strzelczyk R., Trafność pomiaru motorycznych cech kondycyjnych (Accuracy of measurement of motor coordination parameters), Monografie Nr 342, AWF, Poznań 1999. [20] Żak S., Sakowicz B., Rozwojowe i koordynacyjne uwarunkowania doskonalenia sprawności specjalnej dzieci uprawiających piłkę ręczną (Development and coordination conditions for improvement in specific fitness in young handball players), Antropomotoryka, 1995, 12:13-28. 40