EFFECT OF LEVEL OF SURFACE SPOILAGE ON THE NUTRITIVE VALUE OF MAIZE SILAGE DIETS. K. K. Bolsen, L. A. Whitlock, G. L. Huck, M. K.

Similar documents
Spoiled silage 1. Full citation: WILKINSON, J.M Spoiled silage. Norgrass, No. 52, pp

nutrient loss in high moisture forage Department of Animal Sciences IFAS

Silage Management 101: The Basics

FEEDING VALUE OF WET DISTILLERS GRAINS FOR LACTATING DAIRY COWS WHEN CO-ENSILED WITH CORN SILAGE OR HAYCROP SILAGE

Assessing Your J Grennan & Sons Silage Report.

SHREDLAGE IN DAIRY CATTLE RATIONS. L. E. Chase Cornell University

ESTIMATING THE ENERGY VALUE OF CORN SILAGE AND OTHER FORAGES. P.H. Robinson 1 ABSTRACT INTRODUCTION

Using Feed Analysis to Troubleshoot Nutritional Problems in Dairy Herds 1

Harvesting and Preserving More Nutrients from Your Forages

Navigating the dairy feed situation

Understanding Dairy Nutrition Terminology

RenTip # 105 4/22/2016 Silage Assessments

Storage of Wet Distillers Grains

Guidelines for Feeding Broiler Litter to Beef Cattle

EFFECTS OF SUPPLEMENTING PRAIRIE HAY WITH TWO LEVELS OF CORN AND FOUR LEVELS OF DEGRADABLE INTAKE PROTEIN. II. RUMINAL PARAMETERS OF STEERS.

Evaluating particle size of forages and TMRs using the Penn State Particle Size Separator

MICROBIAL INOCULANT EFFECTS ON IN SITU RUMINAL DRY MATTER AND NEUTRAL DETERGENT FIBER DISAPPEARANCE OF CORN SILAGE

DAIRY FOCUS AT ILLINOIS NEWSLETTER. Focus on Forages Volume 2, Number 1

Maximizing Forage Quality

Results of UW Madison Corn Shredlage Feeding Trial

INFLUENCE OF PLANT PARTS ON IN VITRO DRY MATTER DISAPPEARANCE OF FORAGE SORGHUM SILAGES. J. White and K.K. Bolsen

Edible Covers for Bunker Silos

Silage for beef cattle 2018 CONFERENCE. sponsored by: LALLEMAND ANIMAL NUTRITION

!"#$%&'%()$*+%%$,-.$/"01)$! "$ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $

G Testing Livestock Feeds For Beef Cattle, Dairy Cattle, Sheep and Horses

Introduction. Use of undf240 as a benchmarking tool. Relationships between undigested and physically effective fiber in lactating dairy cows

INTERPRETING FORAGE QUALITY TEST REPORTS

HarvestLab John Deere Constituent Sensing

MOLASSES AND COTTONSEED MEAL SUPPLEMENTATION OF AMMONIATED HAY FOR YEARLING CATTLE

Optimizing Forage Quality in Corn Silage

Calcium Oxide and Calcium Hydroxide Treatment of Corn Silage

EFFECT OF RYEGRASS SILAGE DRY MATTER CONTENT ON THE PERFORMANCE OF LACTATING HOLSTEIN COWS

Effective Practices In Sheep Production Series

Matching Hay to the Cow s Requirement Based on Forage Test

Practically improving the feeding value of your maize silage for livestock and AD

Chapter 20 Feed Preparation and Processing

Silage to Beef Application Updates and Equations Explained

Fact Sheet November Why Analyse Silage?

EFFECTS OF SUPPLEMENT SOURCE ON INTAKE, DIGESTION AND RUMINAL KINETICS OF STEERS FED PRAIRIE HAY. Authors:

RFV VS. RFQ WHICH IS BETTER

CHANGES IN RUMINAL MICROBIAL POPULATIONS IN TRANSITION DAIRY COWS

Formulating Lactating Cow Diets for Carbohydrates

FROM HARVEST TO FEED: UNDERSTANDING SILAGE MANAGEMENT

What did we learn about shredlage? Sally Flis, Ph.D. Feed and Crop Support Specialist, Dairy One. Project Summary

The Effects of Two Inoculants Applied to Forage Sorghum at Ensiling on Silage Characteristics

QUALITY AND NUTRITIVE VALUE OF MOTT DWARF ELEPHANTGRASS SILAGE WITH BIOLOGICAL ADDITIVES. T. Clavero. La Universidad del Zulia, Venezuela.

2009 Forage Production and Quality Report for Pennsylvania

Fermentation and Digestion of Formaldehyde Treated Ensiled High Moisture Corn Grain

The Diploma in Ruminant Nutrition

Feed and Alternative Uses for DDGS. Dr. Jerry Shurson and Dr. Sally Noll Department of Animal Science University of Minnesota

Practical Application of New Forage Quality Tests

The Effects of Different Silage Additives on in vitro Gas Production, Digestibility and Energy Values of Sugar Beet Pulp Silage

Sheep Feeding Programs: Forage and Feed Analysis

Feeding Ethanol Co-products from Corn to Beef Cattle

Established Facts. Impact of Post Harvest Forage on the Rumen Function. Known Facts. Known Facts

Impact of Vitreousness, Processing, and Chop Length on the Utilization of Corn Silage by Dairy Cows

THE INFLUENCE OF CORN SILAGE HYBRID VARIETY ON BEEF STEER GROWTH PERFORMANCE. Department of Animal and Poultry Science, University of Guelph

Update on Corn Shredlage for Dairy Cows

Forage Management Considerations to Improve Animal Productivity and Feed Efficiency

Current strategies to increase nutritive value of corn silage. Luiz Ferraretto 1 and Randy Shaver 2

Reducing the reliance on purchased protein. Improving the value of home grown proteins

Forage Testing and Supplementation

Feeding DDGS to Livestock and Poultry. Dr. Jerry Shurson Department of Animal Science University of Minnesota

Dairy Report. Table of Contents

Miguel S. Castillo Juan J. Romero Yuchen Zhao Youngho Joo Jinwoo Park

DIET DIGESTIBILITY AND RUMEN TRAITS IN RESPONSE TO FEEDING WET CORN GLUTEN FEED AND A PELLET CONSISTING OF RAW SOYBEAN HULLS AND CORN STEEP LIQUOR

Feed testing: assessing silage quality

Feeding Strategies When Alfalfa Supplies are Short

Opportunities to Improve Starch Digestibility on Dairy Farms ivstarchd TTSD

Why Graze? Supplementing Lactating Cows Requires Different Thinking. Grazing when grazing wasn t cool!! WHY? Good Pasture WVU Circular 379 Early 50s

Forage crops legumes, grasses, whole-plant

COMPLETE LACTATIONAL PERFORMANCE OF COWS FED WET CORN GLUTEN FEED AND PELLET CONSISTING OF RAW SOYBEAN HULLS AND CORN STEEP LIQUOR

BENCHMARKING FORAGE NUTRIENT COMPOSITION AND DIGESTIBILITY. R. D. Shaver, Ph.D., PAS

FACING THE DIMINISHING CORN SUPPLY: DAIRY ALTERNATIVES

High Sulfur Content in Distillers Grains Alters Ruminal Fermentation and Diet Digestibility in Beef Steers

2017 WESTERN NORTH CAROLINA CORN SILAGE VARIETY TEST REPORT

Quick Start. Cornell Net Carbohydrate and Protein System for Sheep

Wheat Straw Improved by Half-Rate Application of Anhydrous Ammonia

Improving Herd Performance with TMR Audits

The Nutritionist 2019

ENSILING OF SUGAR CANE WITH AMMONIA MOLASSES AND MINERAL ACIDS. T R Preston, C Hinojosa & L Martinez

EFFECTS OF DIFFERENT ADDITIVES ON SILAGE QUALITY OF NAPIERGRASS. Y.K.Cheng, C.S. Chen and P.W. Peng

Principles of Silage Making

The effects of corn silage feeding level on steer growth performance, feed intake and carcass composition.

Exercise 2 Feed Composition and Nutrient Requirements 20 Points

THE INFLUENCE OF CORN SILAGE FEEDING LEVEL ON BEEF STEER GROWTH PERFORMANCE AND CARCASS QUALITY

EFFECT OF INCREASING DIETARY ENERGY CONSUMPTION ON INTAKE, DIGESTION, AND RUMINAL FERMENTATION IN LIMIT-FED STEERS

Effects of Varying Rates of Tallgrass Prairie Hay and Wet Corn Gluten Feed on Productivity of Dairy Cows

Effect of corn silage chemical analysis and ration adjustment frequency on milk production and profitability

SHREDLAGE/CLAAS Launch Exciting New Alliance. Roger Olson Technical Director

CONSTRAINTS IN PREPARATION OF SILAGE

What s the Latest on Carbohydrates, Starch Digestibility, Shredlage and Snaplage for Dairy Cows?

(Equation 1) (Equation 2) (Equation 3)

172 Trop Anim Prod :2

CHAMPION TOC INDEX. Protein Requirements of Feedlot Cattle. E. K. Okine, G. W. Mathison and R. R. Corbett. Take Home Message

Optimizing Nutrient Management and Delivery. Dr. Karl Hoppe Area Extension Livestock Specialist NDSU Carrington Research Extension Center

EFFECT OF MOLASSES AND CORN AS SILAGE ADDITIVES ON THE CHARACTERISTICS OF MOTT DWARF ELEPHANT GRASS SILAGE AT DIFFERENT FERMENTATION PERIODS

SUBSTITUTING STEAM-FLAKED CORN WITH DISTILLER S GRAINS ALTERS RUMINAL FERMENTATION AND DIET DIGESTIBILITY

EFFECTS OF FEEDING WHOLE COTTONSEED COATED WITH STARCH, UREA, OR YEAST ON PERFORMANCE OF LACTATING DAIRY COWS

Making Forage Analysis Work for You in Balancing Livestock Rations and Marketing Hay

Transcription:

ID#09-04 EFFECT OF LEVEL OF SURFACE SPOILAGE ON THE NUTRITIVE VALUE OF MAIZE SILAGE DIETS K. K. Bolsen, L. A. Whitlock, G. L. Huck, M. K. Siefers, T. E. Schmidt, R. V. Pope, and M. E. Uriarte Department of Animal Sciences and Industry, Kansas State University, Manhattan, KS 66506-0201 USA kbolsen@oz.oznet.ksu.edu Abstract This study determined the effect of surface spoilage in the diet on feed intake and nutrient digestibilities using growing steers fed whole-plant maize silage-based diets. A bunker silo, 0.9 m in depth, and a 2.7 m diameter AgBag were filled with alternating loads of chopped forage. After 90 days, the bunker was sealed with a sheet of polyethylene, and this silage was designated spoiled. The silage in the AgBag was designated normal. The four diets contained 90% silage and 10% supplement (dry matter basis), and the proportions of silage in the diets were A) 100% normal, B) 75% normal: 25% spoiled; C) 50% normal: 50% spoiled; and D) 25% normal: 75% spoiled. Feed intake decreased linearly as the proportion of spoiled silage increased from 0 to 75%. Steers consuming the normal silage diet had the highest nutrient digestibilities. Spoiled silage also had negative associative effects on nutrient digestibilities, and the integrity of the forage mat in the rumen was partially destroyed.

Keywords: silage, top spoilage, nutritive value Introduction Whole-plant maize silage is a major source of energy in most lactating dairy cattle and growing beef cattle diets in North America. An important silage management practice, which is in the control of cattle producers and that is often poorly implemented or overlooked entirely, is the discarding spoiled silage. Plastic sheeting was first used to protect the surface of small clamp silos from air and rain or snow in Europe in the 1950s (Shukking, 1976). By the 1960s, sheets were usually made from polyethylene and ultra-violet stabilizers to prevent the material from disintegrating in sunlight. The great benefits of plastic sheeting were that air movement in and out of the silo could be reduced and surface waste could be minimized as a result. But sealing with a polyethylene sheet weighted with old tires is not 100 percent effective, and aerobic spoilage occurs to some degree in virtually all sealed silos (Bolsen et al., 1993). The objective of this study was to determine the effect of including three levels of surface spoiled silage on the nutritive value of whole-plant maize silage-based diets. Material and Methods Twelve crossbred steers, fitted with ruminal cannulas, were used in the study. A single source of irrigated maize (Pioneer 3394) was harvested at the 80% milkline stage of maturity and chopped to a 10 mm particle length. Three pilot-scale bunker silos, 0.9 m deep, and a 6.0 m section of a 2.7 m diameter AgBag were filled with alternating loads of chopped forage. After 90 days, the bunkers were sealed with single sheets of 0.6 mil polyethylene, and these silages were designated spoiled. The silage in the AgBag was

designated as normal. The four experimental diets contained 90% silage and 10% supplement (on a DM basis), and the proportions of silage in the diets were: A) 100% normal, B) 75% normal:25% spoiled; C) 50% normal:50% spoiled, and D) 25% normal:75% spoiled. The diets were fed once daily at 0700, and the amount fed was adjusted so that approximately 10% of the as-fed diet was in the feed bunk at the end of each 24-hr period. Results and Discussion The ph and chemical composition of the whole-plant maize silages fed in the metabolism trial are shown in Table 1. The composition of the spoiled silage is reported for each of the two distinct visual layers, designated as the original top 45 cm and bottom 45 cm, and for a composite of the two layers after they were mixed, which represents the spoiled silage as it was actually fed in rations B, C, and D. With ash content as the internal marker, the estimated proportion of the original top 45 cm and bottom 45 cm spoilage layers in the spoiled composite silage was 23.8 and 76.2%, respectively. The normal maize silage had higher DM and OM contents and slightly lower starch and CP contents than the spoiled composite silage. The normal maize silage also had low NDF and ADF percentages, which reflect the high proportion of grain in the ensiled crop. The high ash and fiber contents of the composite silage are associated with poor preservation efficiency and large OM losses during the aerobic, fermentation, and storage phases. The original top 45 cm layer was visually quite typical of an unsealed layer of silage that has undergone several months of exposure to air and rainfall. It had a foul odor, was black in color, and had a slimy, mud-like texture, and its extensive

deterioration during the 90-day storage was also reflected in very high ph, ash, and fiber values. The original bottom 45 cm layer had an aroma and appearance usually associated with wet, high-acid maize silage, e.g., a bright yellow to orange color, a low ph, and a very strong acetic acid smell. The original depth of the packed, whole-plant maize in the bunker silos was about 90cm; however, the final depth of the spoiled silage was only about 55 cm, with about 20 and 35 cm in the top and bottom depths, respectively. This settling of the ensiled crop that occurred during the 90 days the bunker silo was unsealed, e.g., approximately 35 cm, is typical of settling depths observed in unsealed bunker, trench, or drive-over pile silos. The addition of spoiled silage had large negative associative effects on feed intake and DM, OM, NDF, and ADF digestibilities (Table 2), and the first increment of spoilage had the greatest negative impact The spoiled silage also partially or totally destroyed the integrity of the forage mat in the rumen. The results clearly indicated that feeding surface spoilage had greater negative impacts on the nutritive value of maize silage-based diets than were expected. Future research should focus on the effect of feeding this surface spoilage on livestock performance and on the potential hazards on the health of livestock. References Bolsen, K. K., Dickerson J.T., Brent B.E., Sonon R.N., Jr., Dalke B.S., Lin C.J., and Boyer, J.E., Jr. (1993) Rate and extent of top spoilage in horizontal silos. J. Dairy Sci. 76: 2940-2962. Shukking, S (1976) The history of silage making. Stikstof 19:2-11. kbolsen@oz.oznet.ksu.edu

Table 1 - ph and chemical composition of the whole-plant maize silages fed in the metabolism trial Silage ph DM OM Starch CP NDF ADF % ---------------- % of the DM ---------------- Normal 3.90 38.0 94.7 22.3 6.9 42.6 23.4 Spoiled top layer, composite of the original top 90 cm 4.79 26.4 90.9 24.3 9.9 48.9 31.0 Spoilage layers Original top 0 45 cm (slime layer) 8.22 19.1 80.0 2.7 17.7 57.6 48.3 Original top 45 90 cm (acidic layer) 3.67 27.6 94.3 26.1 6.7 48.5 25.5

Table 2 - Effect of the level of spoiled silage on nutrient digestibilities for steers fed the four whole-plant maize silage diets Diet Item A B C D DM intake, kg/day 7.95 a 7.35 b 6.95 b,c 6.66 c DM intake, % of body weight 2.36 a 2.22 b 2.10 b,c 2.04 c -------------------------- Digestibility, % -------------------------- DM 74.4 a 68.9 b 67.2 b 66.0 b OM 75.6 a 70.6 b 69.0 b 67.8 b Starch 94.6 95.0 93.3 95.3 CP 74.6 a 70.5 b 68.0 b,c 62.8 c NDF 63.0 x 56.0 y 52.5 y 52.3 y ADF 56.1 a 46.2 b 41.3 b 40.5 b a,b,c Means within a row with no common superscript differ (P<.05). x,y Means within a row with no common superscript differ (P<.10).