Studies of the Antigenic relationships between Bluetongue virus serotypes 2, 9 & 15 isolated in Andhra Pradesh, India

Similar documents
Overview of bluetongue disease, viruses, vectors, surveillance and. unique features: the Indian sub-continent and adjacent regions

Comparison of protective Antibody response in guinea pigs immunized with Wild type (Wt) BoHV-1 and ΔgE BoHV-1 mutant virus vaccine

Recombinant Virus Vaccine for Bluetongue Disease in Sheep

DR G.H. GERDES & REF. LABORATORY STAFF ONDERSTEPOORT

Excretion of bluetongue virus in cattle semen: a feature of laboratory-adapted virus

THE CYTOPATHOGENIC ACTION OF BLUETONGUE VIRUS ON TISSUE CULTURES AND ITS APPLICATION TO THE DETECTION OF ANTIBODIES IN THE SERUM OF SHEEP.

Genetically engineered structure-based vaccine for bluetongue disease

The emergence, persistence and evolution of bluetongue viruses in Europe since 1998 Peter Mertens. School of Veterinary Medicine and Science

G. W. WOOD J. C. MUSKETT and D. H. THORNTON MAFF, Central Veterinary Laboratory, New Haw, Weybridge, Surrey, U.K.

A. C. Potgieter, 1 M. Cloete, 1 P. J. Pretorius 2 and A. A. van Dijk 1 3 INTRODUCTION

Comparative susceptibility of BHK-21 and vero cell lines to bluetongue virus (BTV) isolate pathogenic for sheep

Vaccination against Bluetongue

Foot and Mouth Disease Vaccine Research and Development in India

Cedivac-FMD; Duration of Immunity in cattle, sheep and pigs. 2004, 8203 AA Lelystad, The Netherlands * Corresponding Author

Using chloroform as a preservative for trivalent foot and mouth disease vaccine in comparison to thiomersal

Manufacturers expected contribution to the progressive control of Foot-and-Mouth Disease in South Asia

Comparative Susceptibility of BHK 21 and Vero Cell Lines to Bluetongue Virus (BTV) Isolate Pathogenic for Sheep

Bluetongue: An Updated Overview

Monitoring and Intervention Strategies for Bluetongue Virus Epidemics in Rural India

Identification of Microbes Lecture: 12

Min Levine, Ph. D. Influenza Division US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. June 18, 2015 NIBSC

INTERNATIONAL WORKSHOP BLUETONGUE VACCINES 19 February 2013, Strasbourg, France ABSTRACTS

Report concerning identification of the Northern European isolate of BTV (26 th August 2006)

Serological and Immunological Relationships between the 146S and 12S Particles of Foot-and-Mouth Disease Virus

landbouw, natuur en voedselkwaliteit Epidemiological report BTV 6 in the Netherlands

Are Dromedary Camels Susceptible or Non-Susceptible to Foot-and-Mouth Disease Serotype O

Foot and Mouth Disease Control, A vaccine perspective. John Barlow, DVM PhD

BY F. BROWN, B. CARTWRIGHT AND DOREEN L. STEWART Research Institute (Animal Virus Diseases), Pirbright, Surrey. (Received 22 August 1962) SUMMARY

Regulation of FMD vaccines within the European Union

Engineering Foot-and-Mouth Disease Virus with Improved Properties for the Development of Effective Vaccine Introduction: Materials and methods:

Appendix 72 Using NSP ELISA (Chekit-FMD-3ABC Bommeli-Intervet) as a Tool for FMDV Serosurveillance in Bulgaria Abstract: Introduction

ISOLATION OF ENTEROVIRUSES FROM THE "NORMAL" BABOON (PAPIO DOGUERA)l

Distribution of bluetongue in the United States of America,

Comparison of Swine Vesicular Disease Virus and Coxsackie B5 Virus by Serological and RNA Hybridization Methods

BLUETONGUE: PATHOGENESIS AND DURATION OF VIREMIA N James MacLachlan

Agencia Española de Medicamentos y Productos Sanitarios C/Campezo 1, Edificio Madrid España (Reference Member State)

FMD VACCINE AND VACCINATION. Ahmad Al-Majali Dean, Faculty of Vet Medicine JUST Jordan

FMD in Libya. Dr. Abdunaser Dayhum National Center of Animal Health Libya

Isolation of Rhinovirus Intertypes Related to Either Rhinoviruses 12 and 78 or 36 and 58

Lumpy skin disease and bluetongue training of trainers in FYR of Macedonia Skopje, September 2017

Evaluation of antibody response to Goat Pox cell culture vaccine in goats in India

Introduction. In the past 15 years, several technological advancements have open new perspectives and applications in the field of vaccinology.

FMD Carrier state and role of carrier buffalo as source of transboundary spread in Southeast Asia and Eastern Asia Satya Parida

A solid-phase competition ELISA for measuring antibody to foot-and-mouth disease virus

1. Engineering Foot-and-Mouth Disease Viruses with Improved

NEXT GENERATION SEQUENCING OPENS NEW VIEWS ON VIRUS EVOLUTION AND EPIDEMIOLOGY. 16th International WAVLD symposium, 10th OIE Seminar

SHEDDING OF BHV1 AFTER EXPERIMENTAL CONJUNCTIVAL INOCULATION AND AFTER THE REACTIVATION OF LATENT INFECTION IN RABBITS

hemagglutinin and the neuraminidase genes (RNA/recombinant viruses/polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis/genetics)

Reassortment of influenza A virus genes linked to PB1 polymerase gene

Estimations of the Infective Period for Bluetongue in Cattle

Foot and mouth disease situation and control strategies in the People s Republic of China the current situation

CHARACTERISATION OF INFECTIOUS BURSAL DISEASE VIRUS AND DETERMINATION OF POSSIBLE VACCINE STRAIN(S) IN KENYA

Meeting of the Ministers o Agriculture and Food From South Eastern Europe in relation to Bluetongue disease

NOTES CONTAMINATION OF CYNOMOLGUS MONKEY KIDNEY CELL CULTURES BY HEMAGGLUTINATING SIMIAN VIRUS (SV 5)

IMMUNOGENICITY OF FORMALDYDE INACTIVATED NEWCASTLE DISEASE VIRUS FIELD ISOLATE IN MATERNAL ANTIBODY FREE CHICKENS

DRAFT. c 2.G Serological diagnosis of influenza by microneutralization assay 2.G

A PRELIMINARY ANTIGENIC CLASSIFICATION OF STRAINS OF BLUETONGUE VIRUS

of canine rotavirus (strains A79-10 and LSU 79C-36) and with newly defined third (14) and fourth (15) human rotavirus serotypes.

Cross-Reactivity to Field Isolates of Canine Influenza Virus by a Killed Canine Influenza Virus (H3N8, Iowa05) Vaccine

Materials and Methods

Clinical Trials of Pandemic Vaccines: Key Issues. John Treanor University of Rochester Rochester, NY

Title. Author(s)HASHIMOTO, Nobuo. CitationJapanese Journal of Veterinary Research, 28(1-2): 19. Issue Date DOI. Doc URL.

Longevity of the antibody response in pigs and sheep following a single administration of high potency emergency FMD vaccines

Rift Valley Fever: Preventing epizootics and epidemics by livestock vaccination

Generation of Replication-Defective Virus-Based Vaccines That Confer Full Protection in Sheep against Virulent Bluetongue Virus Challenge

The early pathogenesis of FMD and the implications for control measures

however, and the present communication is concerned with some of

Pathogenesis of Simian Foamy Virus Infection in Natural and Experimental Hosts

Foot and Mouth Disease

Chapter - 2 REVIEW OF LITERATURE

Use of a Montecarlo simulation model for the re-planning of. bluetongue surveillance in Italy

NFU INFORMATION & ANALYSIS

ZOETIS ARE PROUD TO SUPPORT THE JOINT ACTION AGAINST BLUETONGUE CAMPAIGN

Column chromatography for the development of pandemic and seasonal influenza vaccines

Development of a predictive model for vaccine matching for serotype O FMDV from serology and capsid sequence

Bovine Viral Diarrhea FAQs

Measles is a chilhood disease caused

Due to the non-availability of a good diagnostic tool, outbreaks however remain undiagnosed in the country.

Effect of Mutation in Immunodominant Neutralization Epitopes on the Antigenicity of Rotavirus SA-11

Key words: foot-and-mouth disease; single emulsion vaccine, saponin, immune response, emergency vaccines.

Preliminary Characterization of D Aguilar Virus and Three Palyam Group Viruses New to Australia

Scientific Opinion on sheep pox and goat pox - first part

The inhibition of FMD virus excretion from the infected pigs by an antiviral agent, T-1105

Update on the BTV situation in France. Pascal HUDELET, LA & VPH Customer Service Sept 2015

Introduction.-Cytopathogenic viruses may lose their cell-destroying capacity

Development of influenza vaccine production by means of chromatographic methods

Equine Infectious Anemia

Determination Of Thermal Stability Of Oral Polio Vaccine (Opv) At Different Temperature Under Laboratory Conditions

Objective 3. Develop new and improved diagnostic tools, vaccines, and novel management approaches

Genomic Alterations Associated with Persistent Infections by Equine Infectious Anaemia Virus, a Retrovirus

EXPORT OF IN-VIVO DERIVED OVINE AND CAPRINE EMBRYOS TO NEW ZEALAND

Vaccines and viral antigenic diversity

FMD Vaccine Strain Selection

Effect of Complement and Viral Filtration on the

Kyoung-Jin Yoon 1, Bruce H. Janke, Rick W. Swalla, Gene Erickson

SEROLOGICAL DIAGNOSIS OF VIRAL INFECTIONS:

Scientific discussion

Characterization of African horsesickness virus serotype 4-induced polypeptides in Vero cells and their reactivity in Western immunoblotting

Overview on Lumpy skin disease in the Mediterranean region: From Middle East to Europe

Comparison between serological & molecular methods for diagnosis of dengue fever and its correlation with duration of illness

Transcription:

Vet. World, 2011, Vol.4(10): 444-448 RESEARCH Studies of the Antigenic relationships between Bluetongue virus serotypes 2, 9 & 15 isolated in Andhra Pradesh, India 1 1 Deepthi Balam*, Sreenivasulu Daggupati, Himaja Maddireddy Department of Microbiology, Veterinary College, Sri Venkateswara Veterinary University, Tirupathi, Andhra Pradesh, India 1. State Department of Animal Husbandry, Andhra Pradesh, India * Corresponding author email: drdeepthib@gmail.com Received: 16-04-2011, Accepted: 21-05-2011, Published Online: 05-09-2011 doi: 10.5455/vetworld.2011.444-448 Abstract The presence of multiple serotypes of the midge-borne bluetongue virus and lack of effective vaccine are the major impediments in controlling bluetongue in sheep. Attempts are being made to develop a vaccine employing the available serotypes to control the disease in the state. Hence, it is essential to identify the antigenic relationships among the serotypes to identify the candidate strains to be incorporated in the preparation of vaccine. To understand the antigenic relationships between Bluetongue virus -2, 9 and 15 serotypes, the viruses were propagated in BHK21 cell lines, purified using PEG precipitation method and purified virus used to raise hyper immune serum in rabbits. Neutralizing antibodies for the BTV serotypes were detected by day 21 PI. Reciprocal cross neutralization test was employed to determine the R% values between BTV-2, 9 and 15 which indicated the extent of antigenic relationships among the serotypes. R% value between BTV-2 and BTV-9 was recorded as 2.8. R% value of 3.53 and 2.8 were observed between BTV-2 & 15 and BTV-9 & 15 respectively. The R% values recorded in the present study revealed a weak antigenic relationship between the BTV serotypes, indicating that the serotypes are highly divergent. Key words: Bluetongue virus; serotypes; antigenic relationship. Introduction Bluetongue (BT) is a non-contagious, arthropod borne viral hemorrhagic disease of ruminants, particularly of sheep and occasionally cattle and some species of deer. It is also associated with abortion storms and high mortalities. The disease, once confined to the exotic sheep viz Southdown, Rambouillet, Russian Merino and Corriedale, recently became established in native sheep of South India, causing severe outbreaks in the region. The disease is reported annually from the south Indian states, Andhra Pradesh, Karnataka, Tamil Nadu and Maharashtra and is causing socioeconomic problems among the sheep farmers. (Sreenivasulu et al. 2004). There are now 24 serotypes of BTV in the world. However 25th serotype was also reported from Kenya (Davies et al., 1992). Of these 21 serotypes have been reported in India (Sreenivasulu et al., 2004). BTV serotype 2 was isolated from native sheep of Chittor district, Andhra Pradesh in 1999 (Sreenivasulu et al.1999). Subsequently, BTV serotype 9 from Mehaboobnagar district in 2002 and BTV serotype 15 from Nalgonda district in 2003 were also isolated from outbreaks in the state (Bommineni et al.2008). These outbreaks were reported to the animal husbandry department of the state government and not to the OIE since the state government is the controlling authority. There is an urgent need to develop the vaccine to control the disease in the state. Control of BT in an endemic region depends primarily on the active immunization of susceptible animals. This requires the identification of the circulating serotypes and determination of their serological relationships. However information is not available on the antigenic relationships among the viruses isolated from South India, particularly from Andhra Pradesh. The current study was thus aimed at determining the antigenic relationships among BTV serotypes -2, 9 and 15 isolated in Andhra Pradesh, to facilitate the selection of viruses for inclusion in the vaccine formulated for disease control. Materials and Methods Bluetongue viruses: BTV-2/TPT, BTV-9/MBN and BTV-15/N12 isolates recovered from bluetongue outbreaks which occurred in Andhra Pradesh, and stored at the department of Microbiology, College of www.veterinaryworld.org Veterinary World, Vol.4 No.10 October 2011 444

Veterinary science, Tirupati, Andhra Pradesh, India, discarded following transfer into the last well. Virus were used in this study at 32nd, 4th and 5th passage containing 100TCID50 at volumes of 50µl were levels respectively. The viruses were grown in BHK21 added to each dilution of the sera. The sera-virus clone 13 cell line for further work. mixtures were incubated for one hour at 37 degrees Purification of Bluetongue virus: The method of Celsius and 5% Co2.. BHK21 cell suspension in Hubschle (1981) with slight modification using growth medium (Himedia) at a concentration of 1 x Polyethylene Glycol (PEG 6000) and sodium chloride 6 10 cells/ml was added to all the wells in 100 µl at the rate of 7% and 2.3% respectively, was used for volumes. Cell controls contained only 100µl of cell virus purification. The presence of virus in the final suspension in growth medium and virus controls pellet was determined by RNA extraction and the contained 100µl cell suspension and 50µl of diluted product was subjected to agarose gel electrophoresis. virus (100 TCID50). The plates were sealed and The migratory pattern of RNA was compared with the incubated at 37 degrees Celsius in a humidified CO2 standard pattern of Bluetongue virus RNA which was atmosphere until a complete monolayer developed in established and is common to all serotypes. the cell controls and complete CPE in the virus Antisera: Antisera were raised against purified BTV- controls was observed. The test was often read 2, 9 and 15 in 8-month old serologically negative following 3-5 days of incubation. The titre of the rabbits as described by Huismans and Erasmus, 1981. serum was regarded as the highest dilution at which In brief, protein content of the antigen (purified virus) the virus was neutralized. The test was read as was quantified by spectrophotometry and the priming positive, in wells with more than 80% of the cell sheet dose was administrated after blending 0.5ml of intact, indicating neutralization of the BTV by the purified BTV (500µg of protein) with an equal antibodies in the hyper immune serum. quantity of Freund's complete adjuvant. Subsequently, Reciprocal cross neutralization test: The protocol three boosters were administered along with Freund's employed for conducting cross neutralization tests incomplete adjuvant. The rabbits were bled a week was essentially similar to Micro Serum Neutralization following administration of the last dose of inoculum Test with slight modifications. Each virus serotype and the serum was collected. All the sera were heat under study was neutralized with the hyper immune 0 inactivated at 56 C for 30 min, sterilized by filtration sera raised against the three serotypes. The through a 0.45µm membrane filter and stored at - homologous serum was titrated from an initial dilution 0 20 C until used. of 1:10, while the heterologous sera were titrated from Agarose gel immune diffusion test (AGID): The initial dilutions of 1:4, to detect cross-reactions even at rabbit sera were tested for the presence of BTV group a lower dilutions of the sera. The serological specific antibodies using respective purified viruses as relationships (R) between the BTV serotypes 2, 9 and antigen and the uninfected cell culture as control. 15 were calculated using the formula as described by AGID detects group specific antigen, NS3 which is Dopazo et al. (1996). common to all the serotypes. R = r1 r2 1 0 0 Microtitre Serum Neutralization Test (MSNT): The quantal microtitre assay was performed using R - value is defined as the ratio of the decreasing serum-constant virus (beta) method heterologous to homologous serum titres. Ratio r1 was (Parker et al., 1975) in sterile flat-bottomed microtitre calculated by dividing the heterologous titre obtained tissue culture plates. This method was employed to with serum 2 by the homologous titre obtained with detect the titre of the hyper immune sera raised against serum 1, and the ratio r2 was determined by dividing each of the virus serotypes and also to determine cross the heterologous titre obtained with serum 1 by the neutralization titres between the serotypes. homologous titre obtained with serum 2. The R value Initially, 1:10 dilutions of the sera were made. gives the extent of the antigenic relationship between The first rows of the microtitre plates were filled with the two viruses. 75µl of diluent, and the second to the last rows Sequence analysis: Multiple sequence alignment of contained only 50µl of the same diluent. Each serotype the VP2 gene (sequence length of 3Kilo Base pairs) of was tested in duplicate, where 25µl was added to the BTV-2, 9 and 15 South African reference serotypes first well of the designated columns, following which (accession numbers AJ585123.1, AJ58130 and serial two fold dilutions from 1/160 to 1/20480 were AJ585136) was carried out by using sequence data prepared by transferring 50µl from the wells in the first obtained from Genbank using BLAST tool V.2.2.17. rows to subsequent wells, and the same quantity was and the alignment was edited using Bio edit V.5.09. www.veterinaryworld.org Veterinary World, Vol.4 No.10 October 2011 445

Percent homology and divergence between the BTV serotypes 2, 9 and 15 was generated by using Martinez Needleman Wunsch algorithm of MegAlign software V.4.03. region of India. Since there is no control over the prevalence of bluetongue virus serotypes and vector control is a difficult task, the best alternative is to develop a suitable vaccine to control the disease. Results Table-2. Cross neutralization titres and titre ratios of BTV serotypes 2, 9 and 15 Bluetongue viruses: BTV-2/TPT, BTV-9/MBN and HIS* against Cross neutralization titre with BTV serotypes BTV-15/N12 isolates grown in BHK 21 cell lines BTV serotype BTV- 2 BTV-9 BTV- 15 yielded infective titres of 4.6, 4.92 and 5.63 TCID BTV 2 320 8 32 50/ml respectively BTV 9 8 256 16 Detection of Bluetongue virus group specific BTV 15 8 8 640 antibodies in hyperimmune sera of rabbits: Titre ratio with Sharp precipitation lines were observed between the BTV- 2 BTV-9 BTV- 15 antigen and the antisera wells in agarose gels indicating BTV 2 1 1/40 1/10 BTV 9 1/32 1 1/16 the presence of BTV group specific antibodies. No BTV 15 1/80 1/80 1 precipitation lines were observed with the control wells containing control cell culture Isolation and identification of circulating serotypes Detection of neutralizing antibodies in the is very essential for the development of vaccine, and it hyperimmune sera by microtitre neutralization is in that context that several BTV-2, 9 and 15 strains tests: The neutralizing antibodies to BTV serotypes were isolated from native sheep of Andhra Pradesh. 2, 9 and 15 were noticed from day 21 post infection An inactivated vaccine using BTV-2, 9, 15 serotypes (PI) and continued to increase reaching a maximum by was subsequently prepared and it is currently under day 45 PI. The neutralizing (SN50) antibody titres field evaluation. To refine the vaccine, it is necessary against BTV-2, 9 and 15 are shown in Table-1. The to identify candidate vaccine strains based on the serum neutralizing titres induced against BTV-2, 9 and antigenic relationships. However, all the available 15 persisted until the end of the experiment, on day 60 serotypes cannot be included in the preparation of PI. vaccine due to the interference phenomenon which Table-1. SN 50 titres of rabbits inoculated with was also reported among the bluetongue virus the three BTV serotypes. serotypes (Roy et al., 1990). Hence, the present study Antisera against SN 50 titres on days post inoculation was under taken to identify the antigenic relationship BTV serotype 0 21 45 60 between BTV-2, 9 and 15 serotypes present in Andhra BTV 2 0 64 320 320 Pradesh. which are being used in the BT vaccine in the BTV 9 0 32 256 160 state. BTV 15 0 128 640 640 Table-3. R value and R% values of BTV-2, 9 and 15. Reciprocal cross neutralization tests: Table-2 indicates the cross neutralization titres and titre ratios BTV Serotypes R value R% value of homologous and heterologous sera. The R-values BTV-2 and 15 28.3 3.53% and R% values are shown in Table-3. R-value for BTV-2 and 9 35.77 2.8% BTV-9 and 15 35.77 2.8% BTV-2 and BTV-15 is 28.3 indicating a relatedness of 3.53%. R-value for BTV-2 and 9 is 35.77 showing a New Zealand white rabbits were utilized to raise relatedness of 2.8%. Similarly, BTV-9 and 15 also hyper immune serum against BTV-2, 9 and 15 showed a relatedness of 2.8%. serotypes. Antibody response directed against VP2 Sequence analysis: The nucleotide and amino acid polypeptide causes neutralization of BTV in vivo and homologies of the BTV reference serotypes ranged in vitro (Huismans et al.,1983). Groocock et al., between 47-53% and 29-41% respectively, indicating (1982) and Chander et al., (1990) reported the weak relationships between the serotypes under study. appearance of neutralizing antibodies in sheep Discussion inoculated with BTV- 20 on 2nd and 3rd week PI. Sreenivasulu and Subba Rao (2000) also demonstrated Insect vector transmission, prevalence of multiple the appearance of neutralizing antibodies by Day 9 PI serotypes, broad host range and non-availability of a in sheep and goat inoculated with BTV- 2. All the three suitable vaccine are playing a major role in establishing serotypes of BTV in the present investigation were and causing regular outbreaks of BT in the Southern immunogenic inducing both neutralizing and www.veterinaryworld.org Veterinary World, Vol.4 No.10 October 2011 446

Figure-1. Serological relationships beteween BTV Serotypes (Mann et.al. 2007) precipitating antibodies. Erasmus (1990) established the serological Studying antigenic relationships among the relationships between 24 BTV serotypes using plaque BTV serotypes is important in the selection of reduction assays (Fig.1). Maan et al., (2007) correlated candidate strains to be included in vaccine preparations. these serological findings with the nucleotide and Dopazo et al., (1996) used reciprocal cross neutralization amino acid homologies and grouped the 24 BTV test to study serological relatedness among aqua serotypes into 10 nucleotypes (A-J). Serotypes having reoviruses and found that the test was most suitable in less than 35% differences in their nucleotide and grouping related viruses. R% value of 100 between amino acid sequences were grouped into one two viruses indicated that they were serologically nucleotype. BTV serotypes 2, 9 and 15 belonged to identical. The R% values obtained in this study three different nucleotypes, I, E and J respectively. indicate a weak antigenic relationship between the Nucleotide sequence variations in segment-2 of three BTV serotypes. Brooksby (1968) also used the the variable VP2 gene correlate with differences in R% values to study the antigenic relationships among virus serotypes (Maan et al., 2007), thus the gene is various strains of foot and mouth disease virus utilized for serotyping viruses on a molecular level. (FMDV) and proposed the R% value of 70% or more Since full length sequences of the indigenous BTV to group the FMDV strains into the same subtype, 32- serotypes was not yet published, reference BTV 70% to identify different subtypes, 10-32% for widely serotypes were used in the study. Though there may be different subtypes and less than 10% for different slight variation between the sequences of reference serotypes of FMDV. Hence, R% values of less than and indigenous serotypes, it is expected that the results 10% are considered to imply that the viruses are will give an idea as to the extent of the relationships antigenically unrelated. The R% values of 2.8, 3.5 and between the serotypes.the genomic relationships 2.8 obtained for BTV serotypes 2, 9 and 15 is less than between the reference BTV serotypes 2, 9 and 15 and 10% and suggest the serotypes are antigenically the R% values (serological relationship) of the unrelated to each other. indigenous BTV serotypes 2, 9 and 15 were taken for www.veterinaryworld.org Veterinary World, Vol.4 No.10 October 2011 447

consideration. R% values obtained using reciprocal JL.(1996). Antigenic differences among aquareoviruses correlate with previously established genogroups.diseases cross neutralization test using BTV-2, 9 and 15 of Aquatic organisms. 26: 159 162. isolated in the native sheep of Andra Pradesh and the 5. Erasmus BJ (1990) Bluetongue virus. In Virus infections of genomic analysis of BTV-2, 9 and 15 reference ruminants, Vol.3 pp. 227 237. Edited by Z. Dinter & B. serotypes revealed very weak antigenic relationship Morein. New York: Elsevier Science Publishers. 6. Groocock CM, Parsonson IM and Campbell CH (1982). and high sequence divergence. It has thus been Bluetongue virus serotypes 20 and 17 infections in sheep. appropriate to include the three isolated BTV-2, 9 and Comparison of clinical and serological responses. Veterinary 15 serotypes in the experimental vaccine to protect Microbiology 7: 189 196. sheep against BTV in Andra Pradesh. Further 7. Hubschle OJB, Lorenz RJ and Mathaka HD. (1981). Enzyme linked immunosorbent assay for detection of bluetongue investigations to isolate and characterize other viral antibodies. American Journal of Veterinary Research circulating BTV serotypes in the region in the event of 42: 61-65. outbreaks are however imperative, to identify suitable 8. Huismans H and Erasmus B J (1981). Identification of serotype specific and group specific antigens of vaccine candidates. bluetongue virus. Ondersteeport Journal of Veterinary The R% values recorded in the present study Research 48: 51 58. revealed a weak antigenic relationship between the 9. Huismans H, Vanderwalt NT, Cloete M and Erasmus BJ. BTV serotypes, indicating that the serotypes are (1983). The Biochemical characterization of bluetongue virus outer capsid polypeptides: In double stranded RNA highly divergent. viruses. Proc. I Inter. Symp. St. Thomas Virgin Islands, R. W. Acknowledgement company and DHL Bishop (eds.) Elsevier, New York. 765-772. The authors are grateful to Sri Venkateswara 10. Maan S, Maan NS, Samuel AR, Rao S, Attoui H and Mertens PPC (2007). Analysis and Phylogenetic comparisons of full- Veterinary University, Tirupati, Andra Pradesh for the length VP2 genes of the 24 bluetongue virus serotypes. facilities provided. Journal of General virology 88: 621 630. References 11. Mehrotra ML and Shukla DC (1990). Sero prevalence, diagnosis and differential diagnosis of bluetongue virus disease in India. Indian Journal of Virology 1-2: 98 103. 1. Brooksby JB. (1968). Variants and Immunity: definitions 12. Parker J, Herniman KAJ, Gibbs EPJ and Sellers RF. (1975). for serological investigations. International symposium on An experimental inactivated vaccine against Bluetongue. Foot and-mouth Disease: Variants and Immunity, Lyon, Veterinary Record 96: 284-287. 1967. Symposia series in Immunological Standardization. 8: 13. Roy P, Urakawa T, Van Dijk AA and Erasmus BJ. (1990). 1-10. Recombinant virus vaccine for Bluetongue Disease in 2. Bommineni YR, Reddy YN, Rao PP, Sudheer D, Susmitha B, Sheep. Journal of virology. 64: 1998 2003. Sarma BJ and Subba Rao MV. (2008). Isolation of 14. Sreenivasulu D, Subba Rao MV, Reddy YN and Gard GP bluetongue virus serotypes 2, 9 and 15 from sheep in India. (2004). Overview of bluetongue disease, viruses, vectors Veterinary Record, 163: 545-546. surveillance and unique features. The Indian subcontinent 3. Chander S, Prasad G and Jain NC.(1990). Clinical, and adjacent regions. Veterinaria Italiana 40(4): 73-77. hematological and immunological studies on sheep 15. Sreenivasulu D and Subba Rao MV. (2000). Clinical, experimentally inoculated with two strains of bluetongue virological and serological responses of sheep and goat viruses of serotype 1. Indian Journal of Virology. 6: 23 31. inoculated with bluetongue virus type2. Indian Journal of 4. Dopazo CP, Bardin I, Rivas C, Cepeda C and Barja Animal Sciences. 70(2): 151-153. ******** www.veterinaryworld.org Veterinary World, Vol.4 No.10 October 2011 448