Patterns of Premature Physeal Arrest: MR Imaging of 111 Children

Kirsten Ecklund 1 Diego Jaramillo 2 Received May 18, 2001; accepted after revision September 25, 2001. Supported in part by grant AR 42396-05 from the National Institutes of Health. 1 Department of Radiology, Children s Hospital, Harvard Medical School, 300 Longwood Ave., Boston, MA 02115. Address correspondence to K. Ecklund. 2 Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, 10 Fruit St., Boston, MA 02215. AJR 2002;178:967 972 0361 803X/02/1784 967 American Roentgen Ray Society Patterns of Premature Physeal Arrest: MR Imaging of 111 Children OBJECTIVE. The purpose of this study was to use MR imaging, especially fat-suppressed three-dimensional (3D) spoiled gradient-recalled echo sequences, to identify patterns of growth arrest after physeal insult in children. MATERIALS AND METHODS. We evaluated 111 children with physeal bone bridges (median age, 11.4 years) using MR imaging to analyze bridge size, location in physis, signal intensity, growth recovery lines, avascular necrosis, and metaphyseal cartilage tongues. Fifty-eight patients underwent fat-suppressed 3D spoiled gradient-recalled echo imaging with physeal mapping. The cause, bone involved, radiographic appearance, and surgical interventions (60/111) were also correlated. Data were analyzed with the two-tailed Fisher s exact test. RESULTS. Posttraumatic bridges, accounting for 70% (78/111) of patients, were most often distal, especially of the tibia (n = 43) and femur (n = 14), whereas those due to the other miscellaneous causes were more frequently proximal (p < 0.0001). The position of the bridge in the physis was related to the bone involved (p < 0.0001). Sixty-five percent of distal tibial bridges involved the anteromedial physis, whereas 60% of the distal femoral arrests were central. Larger bridges had higher T1 signal intensity (p < 0.008). Oblique growth recovery lines were seen exclusively with bridges involving the peripheral physis (p = 0.002) and smaller, more potentially resectable bridges. Metaphyseal cartilaginous tongues were seen with all causes, but avascular necrosis was exclusively posttraumatic (p = 0.03). Signal characteristics and bridge size did not vary with the cause. CONCLUSION. Premature physeal bony bridging in children is most often posttraumatic and disproportionately involves the distal tibia and femur where bridges tend to develop at the sites of earliest physiologic closure, namely anteromedially and centrally, respectively. MR imaging, especially with the use of fat-suppressed 3D spoiled gradient-recalled echo imaging, exquisitely shows the growth disturbance and associated abnormalities that may follow physeal injury and guides surgical management. I njury to the ends of growing bones in children is common and can result in substantial lifelong disability. These deformities are most frequently posttraumatic but may also result from other insults such as infection, ischemia, tumoral invasion, and radiation [1]. The incidence of fractures involving the physis is nearly three per 1,000 children [2]. A subset of physeal injuries leads to premature growth arrest due to the formation of an osseous connection, or bone bridge, between the epiphysis and metaphysis across the physis [3]. If the bridge is large and centrally located in the physis, growth is slowed or stopped and limb shortening results. If the bridge is small but peripheral, growth is tethered and angular deformity develops. Surgical treatment depends on the bridge size and location as determined by imaging. Bone bridges that comprise less than 50% of the physeal area may be treated successfully with bridge excision and interposition of inert material such as fat [4]. Larger bridges often require ipsilateral, contralateral, or combination epiphysiodesis (surgical physeal fusion). Angular deformities are corrected with osteotomies. The location of the bridge in the physis dictates the surgical approach, which attempts to limit the amount of healthy physis traversed. Historically, radiography, tomography, scintigraphy, and CT have been used to evaluate patients with growth arrest. Unfortunately, all of these techniques are limited in their ability to define the relationship of the bone bridge to the cartilaginous physis three-dimensionally. AJR:178, April 2002 967

Ecklund and Jaramillo Recently, MR imaging has become the modality of choice to evaluate physeal abnormalities [5]. With the advantage of volumetric gradientrecalled echo physeal mapping techniques [6 8], MR imaging can accurately depict bony bridging across the physis and provide all of the necessary details to allow surgical planning. The purpose of our study was to use MR imaging, especially with fat-suppressed threedimensional (3D) spoiled gradient-recalled echo sequences, to identify patterns of growth A arrest in children after physeal insult from a number of causes. Materials and Methods We retrospectively reviewed the MR images, radiographs, and clinical records of 111 children studied during the last 11 years who have been shown to have premature physeal growth arrest. The patients included 41 girls and 70 boys ranging from 2 to 17 years old (mean, 11.0 years; median, 11.4 years). Patients with incomplete MR studies available for re- view and those with physeal abnormalities without bony bridging were excluded. In patients with multiple sites of growth disturbance, only the site with the largest bone bridge was included. The MR images and radiographs were reviewed without prior knowledge and independently by two pediatric radiologists after the initial consensual review of our first 10 patients. MR imaging was performed using two 1.5-T systems (Signa releases 5.7 and 5.8 and Horizon releases 8.0 8.3; General Electric Medical Systems, Milwaukee, WI) usually with a receive transmit surface coil. In all patients, the MR examination in- B C D Fig. 1. Large, central distal femoral physeal bridge in 13-year-old boy 6 months after Salter-Harris type 2 fracture. A, Coronal T1-weighted MR image (TR/TE, 300/14) shows high-signal-intensity bridge (arrows) that is isointense to fatty marrow. B, Coronal fat-suppressed three-dimensional (3D) spoiled gradient-recalled echo MR image (21/2; flip angle, 30 ) shows central bridge (open arrow) as low-signal-intensity interruption in normally high-signal-intensity physeal cartilage (solid arrows). C, Reformatted coronal fat-suppressed 3D spoiled gradient-recalled echo MR image from data set in B. Lines indicate 10-mm strip of juxtaphyseal area that is isolated to obtain maximum intensity projection shown in D. D, Axial maximum-intensity-projection physeal map derived from C shows predominately high-signal-intensity physeal area (outer trace) and low-signal-intensity bridge area (inner trace). This bridge comprised 55% of physeal area that is too large for resection. This patient underwent contralateral epiphysiodesis to prevent further leg length discrepancy. 968 AJR:178, April 2002

MR Imaging of Physeal Arrest in Children cluded long-axis (sagittal or coronal) fat-suppressed spin-echo or fast spin-echo intermediate-weighted and T2-weighted imaging (TR range/te range, 2,000 4,000/15 80) and long-axis (usually coronal) spin-echo T1-weighted imaging (TR/TE, 500/15). Coronal gradient-recalled echo imaging (300/13; flip angle, 30 ) without volumetric analysis was performed in the initial 53 patients. The subsequent 58 patients were imaged with a fat-suppressed 3D volumetric spoiled gradient-recalled echo sequence that has been shown to be useful for hyaline cartilage evaluation [6]. Images were usually acquired coronally planned off an axial localizer with the following parameters: TR, approximately 21 msec; minimum allowable TE, usually 2 msec; flip angle, 30 ; matrix, 256 128; excitations, 2; and field of view, variable (depending on patient size). Slice thickness for the 3D sequence was kept to 1 mm or less to allow high-quality multiplanar reformations. Maximum intensity projections of the juxtaphyseal area were then obtained to provide an axial map of the physis using a workstation (Advantage Windows, versions 2.0 and 3.1; General Electric Medical Systems). The workstation software allows a rapid maximum intensity projection constructed from a 5- to 10-mm strip centered on the growth plate (Fig. 1). This technique, which generated a physeal map in less than 2 min, sufficed for most physes. In the minority of cases in which physeal irregularity would not allow a simple maximum intensity projection, manual segmentation of a periphyseal volume was performed. Although this was more laborious, the reconstructions were completed in less than 5 min by experienced users. In the map obtained, the physeal cartilage was of high signal intensity with lower signal intensity ridges coursing through the cartilage in a radial fashion. Bone bridges were easily identified as low-signal-intensity interruptions in the overall high-signal-intensity physis (Fig. 1). The MR images were evaluated for several features. The size of the bridge was recorded as less than or equal to 25%, 26 50%, 51 75%, or greater than 75% of the total physeal area. In addition to the anatomic site involved, the location of the bridge in the physis was classified as central, peripheral, or mixed (both central and peripheral). Additionally, the physis was segmented into a central core and four peripheral quadrants (Fig. 2), and the bridge was assigned to one or more segments on the basis of location. The signal intensity of the bridge on T1-weighted images was defined as hypointense, isointense, or hyperintense relative to adjacent metaphyseal marrow. If metaphyseal growth recovery lines were identified, they were classified as either parallel to the physis or tethered at the physeal bridge. Associated metaphyseal abnormalities, namely extensions of physeal cartilage and areas of necrosis, were also noted. Linear or bandlike areas of metaphyseal high signal intensity on T2-weighted or gradient-recalled echo images were considered persistent cartilage [9]. Areas of increased marrow signal intensity with hypointense margins on T1-weighted images were considered to represent avascular necrosis. Fig. 2. Physeal quadrant diagram. Each bone bridge was assigned to one or more physeal sections. 1 = center of physis, 2 = anterolateral physis, 3 = anteromedial physis, 4 = posterolateral physis, 5 = posteromedial physis. Radiographs obtained concurrent to the MR examinations were evaluated for the presence of a visible bony bridge and associated growth recovery lines. From the clinical records, we obtained data regarding the cause of the growth arrest, the Salter-Harris fracture type in posttraumatic cases, the time from injury to MR imaging, the age of the patient at the time of injury or insult, and any surgical intervention following MR imaging. Associations between the 111 patients and their bridge characteristics and features were identified using the two-tail Fisher s exact test. Results Seventy percent (78/111) of the bridges were posttraumatic. The remaining 33 bridges TABLE 1 were associated with infection (n = 8); Blount disease (n = 7); hip dysplasia treated with hyperabduction (n = 5); tumoral lesions (n = 3); various skeletal dysplasias (n = 3); Madelung deformity (n = 2); and other miscellaneous causes such as juvenile rheumatoid arthritis (n = 1); Legg-Calvé-Perthes disease (n = 1); and enchondromatosis (n = 1). The most common anatomic sites involved were the distal tibia (n = 46), distal femur (n = 20), and proximal tibia (n = 17) (Table 1). In the posttraumatic cases, the mean time from injury to MR evaluation of the bone bridge was 1 year (median, 10.8 months), and the earliest that a bridge was detected was 2 months after injury. Distribution of Physeal Bridges by Anatomic Site and Cause Anatomic Site Trauma Infection Blount DDH Tumor Other Total D. tibia 43 2 1 46 D. femur 14 2 1 1 2 20 P. tibia 6 1 6 4 17 D. radius 6 2 2 10 P. femur 1 5 1 7 D. humerus 5 5 P. humerus 1 2 3 D. fibula 2 2 Phalanx 1 1 Total 78 8 7 5 4 9 111 Note. Other includes skeletal dysplasias, juvenile rheumatoid arthritis, Madelung deformity, Legg-Calvé-Perthes disease, and enchondromatosis. DDH = treated developmental dysplasia of the hip, D = distal, P = proximal. AJR:178, April 2002 969

Ecklund and Jaramillo Radiographs either identified or suggested the presence of a bone bridge in 72 of 111 patients and were, in fact, the impetus for the MR evaluation in most of the patients. Surgical intervention was performed on the basis of the MR findings in 60 of 111 patients. Surgical findings were consistent with bony bridging in all 60 patients. Physeal bone bridges were most easily visualized on the fat-suppressed 3D spoiled gradientrecalled echo sequence. On this fat-suppressed image, the low-signal-intensity bridge, isointense to suppressed fatty marrow, was easily contrasted with the high-signal-intensity physeal cartilage (Figs. 1 and 3). Successful physeal maximum-intensity-projection maps and bridge or physis area ratios were obtained in all 58 patients who underwent the fat-suppressed 3D spoiled gradient-recalled echo sequence. We identified a significant association between the cause of the growth arrest and the anatomic site involved ( p < 0.0001). The posttraumatic bridges tended to be located distally in a bone (71/78), particularly the distal tibia, femur, and radius. Bridges that were due to other causes occurred more frequently at the proximal ends of bones (24/ 33), with the proximal tibia and femur as the most common sites. Regardless of cause, growth arrest with bony bridging was far more common in the lower extremities (93/ 111) than the upper extremities. The location of the bridges in the physis varied with the anatomic site involved ( p < 0.0001). Sixty-five percent (30/46) of distal tibial bone bridges involved the anteromedial aspect of the physis that includes the superiorly convex undulation known as Kump s bump (Fig. 3). The central aspect of the physis was involved in 60% (12/20) of the distal femoral bridges (Fig. 1). Lesions of the proximal femur were more often peripheral (6/7), as were those of the proximal tibia (13/17). The T1 signal intensity of the bone bridges depended on size ( p < 0.008). Larger bridges comprising greater than 25% of the physeal area were more frequently isointense or hyperintense to metaphyseal marrow (33/45), Fig. 3. 14-year-old boy with small, peripheral distal tibial physeal bridge 1 year after SalterHarris type 2 fracture. A, Anterior posterior radiograph shows sclerosis and premature fusion of medial distal tibial physis (solid arrow) with angular deformity. Growth recovery line (open arrows) and physis (arrowheads) converge at bridge. B, Coronal T1-weighted MR image (TR/TE, 300/14) shows low-signal-intensity medial physeal bridge (white arrow). Linear low-signal-intensity growth recovery line (black arrows) is tethered at bridge and shows differential growth between medial and lateral physis (arrowheads) since time of injury. C, Coronal fat-suppressed three-dimensional spoiled gradient-recalled echo MR image (21/2; flip angle, 30 ) clearly shows peripheral bridge (arrow) as low-signal-intensity obliteration of normally high-signal-intensity physeal cartilage. D, Axial maximum-intensity-projection MR image of physis derived from data set in C shows predominately high-signal-intensity physis (outer trace) and low-signal-intensity anteromedial bridge (inner trace) that involves Kump s bump. This bridge involved 19% of physeal area and was resected with resumption of growth and correction of angular deformity. Low-signal-intensity ridges in normal portions of physis probably represent small mamillary undulations and are not likely to be confused with bridges. A B 970 C D AJR:178, April 2002

MR Imaging of Physeal Arrest in Children whereas smaller bridges that had variable signal intensity were often hypointense (32/65). A particularly strong association was noted between the location of the bone bridge in the physis and the appearance of growth recovery lines (p < 0.0002). Only those bridges with a peripheral component were associated with tethered growth recovery lines (Fig. 3B). No oblique growth recovery lines were seen in cases of bridges exclusively involving the central aspect of the physis. Furthermore, most of the bridges associated with tethered growth recovery lines (21/29, 72%) were small, comprising less than 25% of the total physeal area. Metaphyseal extensions of the physis were of high signal intensity on T2-weighted, intermediate-weighted, gradient-recalled echo, and fat-suppressed 3D spoiled gradient-recalled echo images (Fig. 4). There was no association between the prevalence of metaphyseal extensions or the cause: 13 were posttraumatic and 12 had other causes. Segments of avascular necrosis, however, only occurred after trauma (11/78) and were limited to the distal femur (n = 6), distal tibia (n = 3), and distal humerus (n = 2). Metaphyseal areas of avascular necrosis were evident as high T1 signal intensity surrounded by a low-signal-intensity periphery (Fig. 5). Segments of avascular necrosis were typically of low to intermediate signal intensity on gradient-recalled echo and fat-suppressed 3D spoiled gradient-recalled echo images. There were no statistically significant associations between the bony bridge characteristics, such as size, location, T1 signal intensity, Salter-Harris fracture type, or patient sex. Discussion Growth disturbance in children is common and causes considerable lifelong disability. Our study of 111 children with premature physeal bony bridging revealed several patterns of growth arrest that related more to the anatomic site involved than to the cause. Although the focus of this study was on MR imaging in these patients, our results are concordant with the largest published radiography series [10, 11] that have shown that premature growth arrest is more common in the lower extremities than in the upper extremities, regardless of cause. In our patients, as in those prior reports [2, 10], posttraumatic growth arrest occurred more frequently at the distal ends of long bones than at the proximal ends, especially involving the distal tibia and femur. Growth disturbance because of nontraumatic causes, on the other Fig. 4. 13-year-old boy with distal tibial physeal bridge 6 months after Salter-Harris type 4 fracture. Sagittal fat-suppressed fast spin-echo proton density weighted MR image (TR/TE, 2,000/14) shows several sites (arrows) of metaphyseal high signal intensity consistent with cartilage extensions. Associated physeal bridge is suggested as area (arrowheads) of physeal narrowing and diminished signal intensity. Fat-suppressed three-dimensional spoiled gradient-recalled echo images (not shown) showed clear bone bridge. Higher signal intensity linear focus noted more superiorly in metadiaphysis is related to healing fracture line. hand, was more often proximal. Proximal tibial bridging in Blount disease and proximal femoral bridging associated with therapy for hip dysplasia and complicated by avascular necrosis were responsible for this predisposition in our study. Certain anatomic sites seem to be particularly prone to growth arrest. In the large series of physeal fractures by Peterson [2], the distal femur was infrequently injured (1.4% of all physeal fractures) but had a disproportionately high incidence of posttraumatic bridge formation, accounting for 35% of all premature physeal bridges. The explanation for this predilection, also seen in our patients, probably relates to a central physeal undulation, which is the region of earliest physiologic closure of the distal femoral physis [12] and the most common site of premature bridge formation. Sixty percent of our distal femoral bone bridges involved the central physeal undulation (Fig. 1). In a recent study of transverse physeal fractures in rabbits, 60% of the distal femoral fractures involved the juxtaepiphyseal layers of the physis centrally and the juxtametaphyseal region peripherally [13]. This injury to the germinal and proliferative physeal layers at the central undulation likely explains the high incidence of posttraumatic distal Fig. 5. 12-year-old boy 5 months after distal tibial Salter-Harris type 2 fracture. Coronal T1-weighted MR image (TR/TE, 300/14) reveals lateral triangularshaped area of peripheral low-signal-intensity sclerosis (black arrows) and central high-signal-intensity fatty marrow (white arrows) that corresponded to Thurston Holland metaphyseal fragment at time of fracture. This is typical appearance of avascular necrosis in devascularized metaphyseal fracture fragment. Large bridge involving entire medial physis was shown on gradient-recalled echo images (not shown). femoral bone bridge formation. Additionally, the forces required to create a distal femoral physeal fracture are severe abduction, adduction, hyperextension, hyperflexion, or a combination of these [14]. Distal femoral injuries are often severe with a high incidence of associated ligamentous injury. Although our study was not designed to evaluate mechanism of injury as a risk factor for growth disturbance, Peterson has described that the severity of forces and the subsequent complex physeal injury relate to the development of growth arrest. The proximal tibia and distal femur contribute 55 70% to the growth of their respective bone [15], and thus, growth disturbance at these locations results in substantial shortening or deformity. Similarly, 60% of the distal tibial bridges involved the anteromedial quadrant of the physis that encompasses the undulation known as Kump s bump (Fig. 3). Normal distal tibial physeal closure begins at this point [16, 17]. Peripheral bone bridges in the distal tibia frequently caused angular deformity and, not surprisingly, were strongly associated with tethered growth recovery lines. Growth recovery lines, also called Park or Harris lines, represent disks of transversely oriented, rather AJR:178, April 2002 971

Ecklund and Jaramillo than the normal longitudinally oriented, bony trabecula [18]. These disks form at the physis during slowed growth because of injury, immobilization, or illness. As growth resumes, the physis migrates away from the line that remains in the metaphysis. A growth recovery line angled relative to the physis indicates tethering of physeal migration by a bony bridge [19]. Growth recovery lines were best identified on T1-weighted images as low-signal-intensity bands coursing through the high-signal-intensity metaphyseal marrow (Fig. 3B). When the peripheral bridges were particularly small, especially those involving the perichondrium, tethered growth recovery lines provided strong evidence of physeal growth disturbance, whereas lines parallel to the physis confirmed uniform physeal growth. The corollary is that a tethered growth recovery line suggests that the bridge is small (likely <25% of the physeal area) and, thus, surgically resectable. The metaphyseal abnormalities associated with bone bridge formation included segments of avascular necrosis and cartilaginous rests. Avascular necrosis was an exclusively posttraumatic phenomenon in our patients. Devascularized metaphyseal fracture fragments typically appeared as wedge-shaped regions of high T1 signal-intensity fatty marrow surrounded by peripheral low-signal-intensity sclerosis located between the fracture line and the avascular physis (Fig. 5). Similar findings have been mentioned in prior descriptions of physeal fractures using MR imaging [3, 5]. These fragments have not, however, been emphasized on radiographic descriptions because they can be difficult to identify on radiographs and tomograms. We identified them in nearly 15% of the patients with posttraumatic growth arrest, primarily involving the distal femur (6/11) and distal tibia (3/11). The presence of avascular fragments did not vary substantially with the size of the bone bridge. High signal extensions of the physis into the metaphyseal marrow, likely representing tongues of metaphyseal cartilage, were present regardless of the cause of growth arrest (Fig. 4). Cartilage persists in the metaphysis when enchondral ossification is disrupted as the result of metaphyseal vascular disruption [9, 20]. This may be related to many metaphyseal insults, including acute physeal fracture (especially Salter-Harris types 2 and 4), chronic metaphyseal injury such as Blount disease and Madelung deformity, and osteomyelitis and septic arthritis. The results of the 111 patients in our study show that premature physeal bone bridges have a characteristic MR imaging appearance. Larger bridges tend to be of high signal intensity on T1- weighted images, whereas smaller bridges have variable signal intensity. T1-weighted images also ideally reveal growth recovery lines that indicate differential physeal growth. Intermediateand T2-weighted images best reveal associated metaphyseal cartilage extensions. Gradient-recalled imaging optimally depicts the bridge as a low-signal-intensity interruption in otherwise high-signal-intensity physeal cartilage. The volumetric fat-suppressed 3D spoiled gradient-recalled echo sequence allows accurate mapping of the physeal bone bridges that appear as low-signal-intensity areas within the otherwise high-signal-intensity physis. The low-signal-intensity radial ridges seen in the physeal maps, which likely correspond to the normal small mamillary physeal undulations, rarely cause difficulty in interpretation (Figs. 1D and 3D). The accurate visualization of the bridge size and of the location relative to the entire physis is critical to the surgical treatment of patients with growth disturbance. Physes with complex geometry, especially the distal femur and proximal and distal tibia, are particularly vulnerable to bridge formation. Bridging usually occurs at the undulations where physiologic closure begins. The limitations of this study stem from its retrospective nature. We have focused only on the patients who had physeal abnormalities on MR imaging, which precludes determination of the sensitivity and specificity of the technique. To identify sensitivity and specificity accurately, researchers need to perform a prospective study. A prospective study is currently underway to identify prognostic MR imaging features that reveal growth disturbance, possibly allowing intervention before a bone bridge develops. In summary, we identified associations between imaging characteristics, anatomic site, and cause of growth arrest. MR imaging, especially with the use of fat-suppressed 3D spoiled gradient-recalled echo sequences, exquisitely reveals growth disturbance and associated abnormalities that may follow physeal injury in children. MR images in these patients provide information to the treating orthopedist who guides surgical management. References 1. Ogden J. Injury to the growth mechanisms. In: Ogden J, ed. Skeketal injury in the child. Philadelphia: Saunders, 1990:97 174 2. Peterson HA. Physeal and apophyseal injuries. In: Rockwood J, Wilkins KE, Beaty JH, eds. Fractures in children, 3rd ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott-Raven, 1996:103 165 3. Jaramillo D, Shapiro F, Hoffer FA, et al. Posttraumatic growth-plate abnormalities: MR imaging of bony-bridge formation in rabbits. Radiology 1990;175:767 773 4. Kasser JR. Physeal bar resections after growth arrest about the knee. Clin Orthop 1990;255: 68 74 5. Rogers LF, Poznanski AK. Imaging of epiphyseal injuries. Radiology 1994;191:297 308 6. Disler DG. Fat-suppressed three-dimensional spoiled gradient-recalled MR imaging: assessment of articular and physeal hyaline cartilage. AJR 1997;169:1117 1123 7. Borsa JJ, Peterson HA, Ehman RL. MR imaging of physeal bars. Radiology 1996;199:683 687 8. Craig JG, Cramer KE, Cody DD, et al. Premature partial closure and other deformities of the growth plate: MR imaging and three-dimensional modeling. Radiology 1999;210:835 843 9. Laor T, Hartman AL, Jaramillo D. Local physeal widening on MR imaging: an incidental finding suggesting prior metaphyseal insult. Pediatr Radiol 1997;27:654 662 10. Peterson HA, Madhok R, Benson JT, Ilstrup DM, Melton LJ. Physeal fractures. Part 1. Epidemiology in Olmsted County, Minnesota, 1979 1988. J Pediatr Orthop 1994;14:423 430 11. Peterson HA. Physeal fractures. Part 2. Two previously unclassified types. J Pediatr Orthop 1994; 14:431 438 12. Harcke HT, Synder M, Caro PA, Bowen JR. Growth plate of the normal knee: evaluation with MR imaging. Radiology 1992;183:119 123 13. Jaramillo D, Kammen B, Shapiro F. Cartilaginous path of physeal fracture-separations: evaluation with MR imaging an experimental study with histologic correlation in rabbits. Radiology 2000;215:504 511 14. Ogden J. Femur. In: Ogden J, ed. Skeketal injury in the child. Philadelphia: Saunders, 1990: 683 744 15. Ogden J. Radiologic aspects. In: Ogden J, ed. Skeketal injury in the child. Philadelphia: Saunders, 1990:65 96 16. Ogden JA, McCarthy SM. Radiology of postnatal skeletal development. VIII. Distal tibia and fibula. Skeletal Radiol 1983;10:209 220 17. Chung T, Jaramillo D. Normal maturing distal tibia and fibula: changes with age at MR imaging. Radiology 1995;194:227 232 18. Ogden JA. Growth slowdown and arrest lines. J Pediatr Orthop 1984;4:409 415 19. Hynes D, O Brien T. Growth disturbance lines after injury of the distal tibial physis: their significance in prognosis. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1988;70: 231 233 20. Jaramillo D, Laor T, Zaleske DJ. Indirect trauma to the growth plate: results of MR imaging after epiphyseal and metaphyseal injury in rabbits. Radiology 1993;187:171 178 972 AJR:178, April 2002