Estimated Minnesota Cancer Prevalence, January 1, MCSS Epidemiology Report 04:2. April 2004

Similar documents
Epidemiology in Texas 2006 Annual Report. Cancer

Chapter II: Overview

CANCER FACTS & FIGURES For African Americans

Cancer in New Mexico 2017

Cancer in New Mexico 2014

Construction of a North American Cancer Survival Index to Measure Progress of Cancer Control Efforts

National Cancer Statistics in Korea, 2014

American Cancer Society Estimated Cancer Deaths by Sex and Age (years), 2013

Cancer in Utah: An Overview of Cancer Incidence and Mortality from

NIH Public Access Author Manuscript Cancer. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2006 December 17.

Cancer in Ontario. 1 in 2. Ontarians will develop cancer in their lifetime. 1 in 4. Ontarians will die from cancer

SMOKING AND CANCER RISK

APPENDIX ONE: ICD CODES

Key Words. Cancer statistics Incidence Lifetime risk Multiple primaries Survival SEER

Cancer prevalence. Chapter 7

The Cancer Burden in California. Janet Bates MD MPH California Cancer Registry California Department of Public Health April 25, 2012

Cancer Statistics, 2011

Truman Medical Center-Hospital Hill Cancer Registry 2014 Statistical Summary Incidence

Information Services Division NHS National Services Scotland

What is the Impact of Cancer on African Americans in Indiana? Average number of cases per year. Rate per 100,000. Rate per 100,000 people*

Samuel M. Lesko, MD, MPH Director of Research/Medical Director

Cancer in Colorado Incidence, Mortality, and Survival

Impact and implications of Cancer Death Status Reporting Delay on Population- Based Relative Survival Analysis with Presumed-Alive Assumption

2011 to 2015 New Cancer Incidence Truman Medical Center - Hospital Hill

Cancer Statistics, 2008

Cancer in Northeastern Pennsylvania: Incidence and Mortality of Common Cancers

*

Cancer in Northeastern Pennsylvania: Incidence and Mortality of Common Cancers

Cancer in Northeastern Pennsylvania: Incidence and Mortality of Common Cancers

CANCER RATES AND TRENDS IN NORTHEASTERN MINNESOTA. MCSS Epidemiology Report 97:1. September 1997

PREVIEW OF REGISTRY-SPECIFIC AND AGGREGATED RELATIVE SURVIVAL ESTIMATES IN CANCER IN NORTH AMERICA

Prediction of Cancer Incidence and Mortality in Korea, 2018

Overview of All SEER-Medicare Publications

Outcomes Report: Accountability Measures and Quality Improvements

ANNUAL CANCER REGISTRY REPORT-2005

SMOKING AND CANCER RISK

Key Words. SEER Cancer Survival Incidence Mortality Prevalence

Information Services Division NHS National Services Scotland

Cancer survival in Seoul, Republic of Korea,

Cancer Facts & Figures for African Americans

Evaluation of Ancestry Information Markers (AIMs) from Previous ACOSOG/CALGB/NCCTG Trials

NEZ PERCE COUNTY CANCER PROFILE

KOOTENAI COUNTY CANCER PROFILE

BOUNDARY COUNTY CANCER PROFILE

Information Services Division NHS National Services Scotland

ADAMS COUNTY CANCER PROFILE

Prediction of Cancer Incidence and Mortality in Korea, 2013

BONNER COUNTY CANCER PROFILE

Annual Report to the Nation on the Status of Cancer, , with a Special Feature Regarding Survival

BINGHAM COUNTY CANCER PROFILE

NEZ PERCE COUNTY CANCER PROFILE

KOOTENAI COUNTY CANCER PROFILE

Colorectal Cancer Screening

TWIN FALLS COUNTY CANCER PROFILE

JEROME COUNTY CANCER PROFILE

BUTTE COUNTY CANCER PROFILE

LINCOLN COUNTY CANCER PROFILE

CANYON COUNTY CANCER PROFILE

THE BURDEN OF CANCER IN NEBRASKA: RECENT INCIDENCE AND MORTALITY DATA

Cancer incidence and mortality patterns among specific Asian and Pacific Islander populations in the U.S.

Cancer in the Northern Territory :

Cancer Statistics, 2009 Ahmedin Jemal, Rebecca Siegel, Elizabeth Ward, Yongping Hao, Jiaquan Xu and Michael J. Thun. DOI: /caac.

Cancer Statistics, 2010 Ahmedin Jemal, Rebecca Siegel, Jiaquan Xu and Elizabeth Ward. DOI: /caac.20073

Overview of Hong Kong Cancer Statistics of 2015

Cancer in Estonia 2014

Annual Report to the Nation on the Status of Cancer, , Featuring Survival Questions and Answers

Outcomes Report: Accountability Measures and Quality Improvements

Overview of 2010 Hong Kong Cancer Statistics

Cancer in Rural Illinois, Incidence, Mortality, Staging, and Access to Care. April 2014

Cancer survival in Shanghai, China,

Annual Report to the Nation on the Status of Cancer, , Featuring Survival

Cancer Facts & Figures for African Americans

Cancer of the Breast (Female) - Cancer Stat Facts

Cancer in Maine: Using Data to Direct Actions 2018 Challenge Cancer Conference May 1, 2018

DATA UPDATE: CANCER INCIDENCE IN DAKOTA AND WASHINGTON COUNTIES

Appendix 1 (as supplied by the authors): Supplementary data

A Time- and Resource-Efficient Method for Annually Auditing All Reporting Hospitals in Your State: the Inpatient & Outpatient Hospital Discharge Files

Cancer Statistics, 2007 Ahmedin Jemal, Rebecca Siegel, Elizabeth Ward, Taylor Murray, Jiaquan Xu and Michael J. Thun

Annual Report. Cape Cod Hospital and Falmouth Hospital Regional Cancer Network Expert physicians. Quality hospitals. Superior care.

Table E1. Standardized Mortality Ratios for Total and Specific Causes of Death Parameter Radiologists Psychiatrists No. of Deaths

Common Questions about Cancer

ALL CANCER (EXCLUDING NMSC)

OBESITY AND CANCER RISK

OBESITY AND CANCER RISK

Cancer survival in Hong Kong SAR, China,

DATA UPDATE: CANCER INCIDENCE IN DAKOTA AND WASHINGTON COUNTIES

Cancer Dispari,es in Indiana

This report was made possible by Summit County Public Health s Cancer Concerns Assessment Team. Special thanks for their contribution and assistance

Suggested Citation: Copyright Information:

Annual Report to the Nation on the Status of Cancer, , Featuring the Increasing Incidence of Liver Cancer

ALL CANCER (EXCLUDING NMSC)

Cancer in New Brunswick

Cancer in Puerto Rico:

of Nebraska - Lincoln

A New Measure to Assess the Completeness of Case Ascertainment

Overview of Gynecologic Cancers in New Jersey

Cancer in Ireland : Annual Report of the National Cancer Registry

Incidence of Cancers Associated with Modifiable Risk Factors and Late Stage Diagnoses for Cancers Amenable to Screening Idaho

Cancer Incidence in New Jersey Implementation of the Year 2000 Population Standard

Overview of 2013 Hong Kong Cancer Statistics

Transcription:

MCSS Epidemiology Report 04:2

Suggested citation Perkins C, Bushhouse S.. Minnesota Cancer Surveillance System. Minneapolis, MN, http://www.health.state.mn.us/divs/hpcd/ cdee/mcss),. 1

Background Cancer prevalence is the number of persons alive on a certain date in a population who were previously diagnosed with cancer. Because individuals continue to require services, support, and care beyond the year in which they were diagnosed, it is an important measure of the burden of cancer in society. An estimated 9.6 million Americans, or 3.4 the entire population, were living with a history of cancer on January 1, 2000, 1 compared to an estimated 1.2 million newly diagnosed with cancer in 1999. 2 Cancer prevalence in Minnesota has not previously been presented by the Minnesota Cancer Surveillance System (MCSS). Cancer prevalence includes persons diagnosed with a potentially serious (invasive) cancer, and excludes people diagnosed with common skin cancers or in situ disease. Prevalent cancers include both newly diagnosed cases and individuals who have survived their disease, whether they are considered cancer-free or are still undergoing treatment. It is affected by present and past cancer incidence, cancer survival rates, and death from other causes. Because these factors vary by age, race/ethnicity, and gender, prevalence is also affected by the demographic characteristics of the population. Prevalence can count persons ever diagnosed with cancer and still alive (complete prevalence), or those who were diagnosed during a specified time period such as the previous five, ten, or twenty-five years (limited duration prevalence). Prevalence percents are calculated by dividing the number of prevalent cases by the total number of people in the population at the given point in time. People can be diagnosed with and survive more than one cancer. The prevalence counts presented here count a person only once, ignoring any cancer(s) that he or she might have developed after the first diagnosis. Because people with a history of cancer can live a normal lifespan, few cancer registries have registered cancer patients for a sufficient length of time to directly measure complete prevalence. In the U.S., the Connecticut cancer registry has registered cancer patients since 1940, and is the source used to approximate complete prevalence. The Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) program of the National Cancer Institute has registered cancer patients in nine geographic regions covering about ten percent of the U.S. population since 1975, and has nearly complete (95%) follow-up on the vital status of patients. Prevalence percents from the nine SEER regions can be used to estimate limited duration cancer prevalence in geographic areas where cancer registries have operated for a shorter period of time or where follow-up is incomplete. For a complete discussion of SEER methods, see the Overview section of SEER Cancer Statistics Review, 1975-2000. 1 2

Methods MCSS cannot directly calculate prevalence for Minnesota because MCSS has only registered cancers in Minnesota since 1988 and does not have complete follow-up information on the vital status of the individual. However, prevalence percents based on cancer registration in the SEER program have recently been made available in the Cancer Prevalence Database 3 and are the basis for estimating complete and five-year prevalence for Minnesota. The age-, sex- and site-specific cancer prevalence percents (5-year and 25-year) for the white population in the nine regions participating in the SEER program since 1975 were obtained from the Cancer Prevalence Database for all sites combined and the most common cancers. Prevalence percents were multiplied by the corresponding age- and sex-specific population estimates for Minnesota on January 1, 2000, obtained by averaging estimates for the mid-year of 1999 and 2000 obtained from SEER. To adjust for generally lower cancer rates in Minnesota, the resulting numbers were multiplied by age-, sex- and site-specific rate ratios for cancer incidence in Minnesota and in SEER 9 Region whites during 1995-1999 for five-year prevalence estimates, and during 1988-1999 for complete prevalence. For six sites (brain and nervous system, kidney and renal pelvis, liver and intrahepatic bile duct, lung and bronchus, myeloma, and pancreas), mortality rate ratios were used because MCSS does not include clinically diagnosed cancers. In the SEER database, greater than five percent of these cancers are clinically diagnosed. Age-specific estimates were summed for site and sex totals and rounded to the nearest ten persons. The prevalence estimates for males and females were summed to estimate prevalence for both sexes combined. Complete prevalence was estimated by applying the site-specific ratio of complete and 25-year prevalence in the U.S. from the Cancer Prevalence Database to the 25-year estimates for Minnesota. Limitations The prevalence data presented here are estimates, not actual counts of Minnesotans living with cancer. Adjusting the prevalence percents for the white population in the nine SEER regions by known differences in cancer occurrence between Minnesota and SEER decreased the fiveyear cancer prevalence estimate for Minnesota by about six percent, and the complete cancer prevalence by about seven percent. This is appropriate given that overall cancer incidence has historically been lower in Minnesota than in the geographic areas participating in the SEER program. However, other factors affecting cancer prevalence could not be adjusted for. If Minnesotans have higher cancer survival rates than SEER 9 Region whites, our prevalence estimates will be too low. MCSS is not yet able to calculate cancer survival rates for Minnesotans because of incomplete follow-up information. However, given the recognized high quality of health care in Minnesota, higher survival rates in Minnesota may occur. Similarly, Minnesotans have a longer life expectancy than many other states, due in part to having the lowest heart disease mortality rate in the nation. Since Minnesotans live longer, these prevalence estimates may be too low. It is therefore likely that the prevalence estimates presented here represent the lower limits of actual prevalence. 3

Results As of January 1, 2000, an estimated 156,620 Minnesotans were living with a history of cancer (Table 1), or 3.2 the Minnesota population. An estimated 59,690 of these survivors had been diagnosed in the previous five years (Table 2), or 1.2 Minnesotans. A total of 22,007 Minnesotans were diagnosed with cancer in 1999. 4 The number of persons living with a history of cancer for up to five years is very similar for men and women (29,990 and 29,700, respectively). However, the number of women ever diagnosed with cancer and alive on January 1, 2000 (86,540) is much larger than the number of men (70,080). This reflects the fact that women live on average more than five years longer than men, and that breast cancer tends to be diagnosed at a younger age. Among Minnesota female cancer survivors, two out of five (43% or 37,470 women) have a history of breast cancer; among male cancer survivors, two out of five (41% or 28,480 men) have a history of prostate cancer. These large numbers reflect the facts that breast and prostate cancer accounted for about a third of all cancers diagnosed among men and women in 1999, and that survival is very high. Lung cancer, on the other hand, accounted for 12 cancers diagnosed in 1999, but only 3 cancer survivors, because survival is poor. Conclusions The number of Minnesotans diagnosed with cancer in a given year is only a fraction of those who are living with a history of cancer. It is hoped that these estimates will be useful for those involved in planning and policy related to cancer control. References 1 Ries LAG, Eisner MP, Kosary CL, Hankey BF, Miller BA, Clegg L, Mariotto A, Fay MP, Feuer EJ, Edwards BK (eds). SEER Cancer Statistics Review, 1975-2000, National Cancer Institute. Bethesda, MD, http://seer.cancer.gov/csr/1975_2000, 2003. 2 American Cancer Society. Cancer Facts and Figures, 1999. American Cancer Society. Atlanta, GA. 1999. 3 Cancer Query System, Cancer Prevalence Database. Available at http://srab.cancer.gov/ prevalence/canques.html. Statistical Research and Applications Branch, Cancer Control and Population Sciences, National Cancer Institute. 4 Perkins C, Trute W, Soler J, DeWaard E, Bushhouse S. Cancer in Minnesota, 1988-1999, Minnesota Cancer Surveillance System. Minneapolis, MN, http://www.health.state.mn.us/divs/ hpcd/cdee/mcss), 2003. 4

Table 1: Estimated Complete Cancer Prevalence by Sex and Cancer Type, Minnesota, January 1, 2000 Males Females Total Persons Survivors All Sites Combined 70,080 100% 86,540 100% 156,620 100% Brain and Nervous System 1,070 1.5% 980 1.1% 2,050 1.3% Breast 170 0.2% 37,470 43.3% 37,640 24.0% Cervix Uteri 0 0.0% 3,540 4.1% 3,540 2.3% Colon and Rectum 8,450 12.1% 9,100 10.5% 17,550 11.2% Corpus and Uterus, NOS 0 0.0% 9,650 11.2% 9,650 6.2% Esophagus 260 0.4% 70 0.1% 330 0.2% Hodgkin Lymphoma 1,300 1.9% 1,170 1.3% 2,470 1.6% Kidney and Renal Pelvis 2,360 3.4% 1,810 2.1% 4,170 2.7% Larynx 1,190 1.7% 230 0.3% 1,420 0.9% Leukemia 1,930 2.8% 1,440 1.7% 3,370 2.2% Liver and Intrahepatic Bile Duct 100 0.1% 60 0.1% 160 0.1% Lung and Bronchus 2,620 3.7% 2,420 2.8% 5,040 3.2% Melanoma of the Skin 3,780 5.4% 4,320 5.0% 8,100 5.2% Myeloma 380 0.5% 300 0.3% 680 0.4% Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma 2,910 4.2% 2,830 3.3% 5,740 3.7% Oral Cavity and Pharynx 2,570 3.7% 1,320 1.5% 3,890 2.5% Ovary 0 0.0% 3,360 3.9% 3,360 2.1% Pancreas 190 0.3% 200 0.2% 390 0.2% Prostate 28,480 40.6% 0 0.0% 28,480 18.2% Stomach 480 0.7% 330 0.4% 810 0.5% Testis 2,920 4.2% 0 0.0% 2,920 1.9% Thyroid 1,100 1.6% 3,540 4.1% 4,640 3.0% Urinary Bladder 5,960 8.5% 2,140 2.5% 8,100 5.2% Estimated number of Minnesotans ever diagnosed with an invasive cancer and alive on January 1, 2000, rounded to the nearest ten persons, using the first malignant primary for a person. Estimates are based on prevalence percentages on January 1, 2000, for the white population in the nine geographic areas participating in the SEER program since 1975, 1,2 adjusted for differences in cancer occurrence between SEER and Minnesota. Please see text for a fuller discussion of methods. 5

Table 2: Estimated Five-Year Cancer Prevalence by Sex and Cancer Type, Minnesota, January 1, 2000 Males Females Total Persons Survivors All Sites Combined 29,990 100% 29,700 100% 59,690 100% Brain and Nervous System 380 1.3% 360 1.2% 740 1.2% Breast 70 0.2% 12,780 43.0% 12,850 21.5% Cervix Uteri 0 0.0% 680 2.3% 680 1.1% Colon and Rectum 3,270 10.9% 3,240 10.9% 6,510 10.9% Corpus and Uterus, NOS 0 0.0% 2,420 8.1% 2,420 4.1% Esophagus 200 0.7% 50 0.2% 250 0.4% Hodgkin Lymphoma 320 1.1% 280 0.9% 600 1.0% Kidney and Renal Pelvis 890 3.0% 590 2.0% 1,480 2.5% Larynx 430 1.4% 90 0.3% 520 0.9% Leukemia 820 2.7% 570 1.9% 1,390 2.3% Liver and Intrahepatic Bile Duct 90 0.3% 40 0.1% 130 0.2% Lung and Bronchus 1,650 5.5% 1,480 5.0% 3,130 5.2% Melanoma of the Skin 1,420 4.7% 1,360 4.6% 2,780 4.7% Myeloma 280 0.9% 250 0.8% 530 0.9% Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma 1,340 4.5% 1,250 4.2% 2,590 4.3% Oral Cavity and Pharynx 960 3.2% 440 1.5% 1,400 2.3% Ovary 0 0.0% 1,250 4.2% 1,250 2.1% Pancreas 150 0.5% 140 0.5% 290 0.5% Prostate 13,880 46.3% 0 0.0% 13,880 23.3% Stomach 250 0.8% 140 0.5% 390 0.7% Testis 700 2.3% 0 0.0% 700 1.2% Thyroid 310 1.0% 960 3.2% 1,270 2.1% Urinary Bladder 2,280 7.6% 760 2.6% 3,040 5.1% Estimated number of Minnesotans diagnosed with an invasive cancer during 1995-1999 and alive on January 1, 2000, rounded to the nearest ten persons, using the first malignant primary for a person. Estimates are based on prevalence percentages on January 1, 2000, for the white population in the nine geographic areas participating in the SEER program since 1975, 1,2 adjusted for differences in cancer occurrence between SEER and Minnesota. Please see text for a fuller discussion of methods. 6