DEFINITIVE GLOBAL REPORT FLOW CYTOMETRY: LYMPHOCYTE SUBSET ANALYSIS SURVEY 2016/3

Similar documents
DEFINITIVE GLOBAL REPORT FLOW CYTOMETRY: LYMPHOCYTE SUBSET ANALYSIS SURVEY 2016/2

DEFINITIVE GLOBAL REPORT FLOW CYTOMETRY: LYMPHOCYTE SUBSET ANALYSIS SURVEY 2015/3

DEFINITIVE GLOBAL REPORT FLOW CYTOMETRY: LYMPHOCYTE SUBSET ANALYSIS SURVEY 2015/2

DEFINITIVE GLOBAL REPORT

DEFINITIVE GLOBAL REPORT

DEFINITIVE GLOBAL REPORT

DEFINITIVE GLOBAL REPORT

DEFINITIVE ANNUAL REPORT FLOW CYTOMETRY: LYMPHOCYTE SUBSET ANALYSIS CD34+ STEM CELL ENUMERATION 2015

DEFINITIVE ANNUAL REPORT FLOW CYTOMETRY: LYMPHOCYTE SUBSET ANALYSIS CD34+ STEM CELL ENUMERATION 2014

DEFINITIVE ANNUAL REPORT FLOW CYTOMETRY: LYMPHOCYTE SUBSET ANALYSIS CD34+ STEM CELL ENUMERATION 2013

ACS GUIDELINE FOR LYMPHOCYTE SUBSET IMMUNOPHENOTYPING. Second Edition Australasian Cytometry Society Guideline Document

Homogeneity in EQA bacteriology & parasitology

Evaluation of a Method for Counting Absolute Numbers of Cells with a Flow Cytometer

How can Blood Stabilizers be used for Validation of New Instruments? UK NEQAS for Leucocyte Immunophenotyping

AIDS. actions undertaken in Belgium

Surveillance of Clostridium difficile infection (CDI) in Belgium

PROFICIENCY TESTING 2016

DEFINITIVE GLOBAL ANNUAL REPORT Molecular Biology Microbiology 2015

" EXTERNAL QUALITY EVALUATION PROGRAM FOR POCT GLUCOSE TESTING years of experience

Table of Contents. Plots. Essential Statistics for Nursing Research 1/12/2017

Averages and Variation

Water Microbiology Proficiency Test Scheme. Overview & Description

Introduction to Statistical Data Analysis I

FACT SHEET. A selection of internet-based information. Methedrone (bk-pmma)

Epidemiology of Clostridium difficile infection in Belgium Report 2015

Report of the first Inter-Laboratory Comparison Test organised by the Community Reference Laboratory for Mycotoxins

Clinical surveillance of the Influenza A(H1N1)2009 pandemic through the network of Sentinel General Practitioners

Business Statistics (ECOE 1302) Spring Semester 2011 Chapter 3 - Numerical Descriptive Measures Solutions

Forum for Collaborative HIV Research External Validation of CD4 and Viral Load Assays Paris, France June 29, 2007

Evaluation of a Single-Platform Technology for Lymphocyte Immunophenotyping

NIAID DAIDS FLOW CYTOMETRY LABORATORY CERTIFICATION

Flow Cytometric Analysis of T -Lym phocytes Subsets in Adult Thais

How to interpret scientific & statistical graphs

Next generation sequencing technology in routine analysis in Belgian healthcare system

Th17 and Th17/Treg ratio at early HIV infection associate with protective HIV-specific CD8 + T-cell responses and disease progression

Risk assessment group (RAG), between

BLOOD TRANSFUSIONS. Answers. To Your. Questions

Understandable Statistics

Epidemiology of Clostridium difficile infection in Belgium. C. VALENCIA, M.-L. LAMBERT For the National Reference Laboratory: M. DELMÉE, J.

VOICE Screening Part 1 Visit. Operational Walkthrough Johannesburg, South Africa November 2008

Evaluation of the Abbott CELL-DYN 4000 Hematology Analyzer

WHO Prequalification of Diagnostics Programme PUBLIC REPORT

Population. Sample. AP Statistics Notes for Chapter 1 Section 1.0 Making Sense of Data. Statistics: Data Analysis:

IARC Monographs on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans. VOLUME 93 Carbon Black, Titanium Dioxide, and Talc

A Cellular Antigen Stabilisation Reagent

Titrations in Cytobank

MHC MULTIMER PROFICIENCY PANEL 2015

Jan Philippé. VAKB 3 februari 2014

Basic Statistics 01. Describing Data. Special Program: Pre-training 1

RIC Information for Patients

Epidemiology of HAV, HDV and HEV in Belgium

Frequency distributions

Field and laboratory scenario for gastro-enteritis outbreaks: norovirus

STUDY PROTOCOL. CCQM-K139 and CCQM-P173. Elements in Human Serum

Flow Cytometric Analysis of Cerebral Spinal Fluid Involvement by Leukemia or Lymphoma

PsychTests.com advancing psychology and technology

Quality Management 333 Liam Whitby 1.2 Liam Whitby 24-Jul Jul-2016 unknown

ANOVA in SPSS (Practical)

Supplementary Figure 1. Effects of EDTA and ACD anticoagulants on blood storage. (a) EDTA

MHC MULTIMER PROFICIENCY PANEL 2017

How well does the Belgian population comply with the DRV s for vitamins and minerals?

Automatic buffy coat extraction: methodology, feasibility, optimization and validation study

Severe Acute Respiratory Infections during the Influenza A(H1N1)2009 pandemic in Belgium: first experience of hospital-based flu surveillance

FLOW CYTOMETRY PRINCIPLES AND PRACTICE. Toby Eyre Consultant Haematologist Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust June 2018

PERIOSTIN ELISA CONTENTS

Tube 1 : FLAER/CD24/CD16/CD15/CD45

Figure S1. Gating strategy used in NK cells and γδ T lymphocytes coculture An example of flow cytometry analysis shows the gating of NK cells and γδ

Validation Study Result Form

Medical Statistics 1. Basic Concepts Farhad Pishgar. Defining the data. Alive after 6 months?

Summarizing Data. (Ch 1.1, 1.3, , 2.4.3, 2.5)

Unit 1 Exploring and Understanding Data

B and T-Cells. CD8+ Cytotoxic T Cells

State of the Art of Rare Disease - Activities in EU Member States and Other European Countries. Belgium Report

a Beckman Coulter Life Sciences: White Paper

Midterm Exam MMI 409 Spring 2009 Gordon Bleil

Database on Blood Safety 2009 in ECO Member States

Sandwell Early Numeracy Test

List of Figures. List of Tables. Preface to the Second Edition. Preface to the First Edition

Feed Additive Approval An Industry View. Dr Heidi Burrows Regulatory manager

Technical Bulletin No. 157

3: Summary Statistics

Advanced. Vertebroplasty. therapy BASED ON 30 YEARS OF EXPERIENCE

The clinical trial information provided in this public disclosure synopsis is supplied for informational purposes only.

Statistics and Probability

biological agents volume 100 B A review of human carcinogens iarc monographs on the evaluation of carcinogenic risks to humans

HIV Viral Load Quality Assessment Program Summary for Panel HIVVL 2018Oct26

DR SUDHIR MEHTA MD,MNAMS,FICP. Senior Professor & Head Medical Unit SMS Medical College & Hospital Jaipur

PanLeucogating Akin Abayomi

Strategic partner for the Québec health system

3. Blood Cell Histograms:

Lysosomal Enzymes in fibroblasts

HIV Viral Load Quality Assessment Program Summary for Panel HIVVL 2017Oct27

Pilots large scale 2006 (36) 2007 (46) 2008 (55) 2009 (59)

Answers. To Your. Questions

Outline. Practice. Confounding Variables. Discuss. Observational Studies vs Experiments. Observational Studies vs Experiments

the standard deviation (SD) is a measure of how much dispersion exists from the mean SD = square root (variance)

Training And Resource Manual On School Health And HIV/AIDS Prevention

EFSA PRE-SUBMISSION GUIDANCE FOR APPLICANTS INTENDING TO SUBMIT APPLICATIONS FOR AUTHORISATION OF HEALTH CLAIMS MADE ON FOODS

Food Proficiency Testing Program Round 36 Whole Milk Powder

Transcription:

EXPERTISE, SERVICE PROVISION AND CUSTOMER RELATIONS QUALITY OF MEDICAL LABORATORIES CLINICAL BIOLOGY COMMISSION COMMITTEE OF EXPERTS EXTERNAL QUALITY ASSESSMENT IN CLINICAL BIOLOGY DEFINITIVE GLOBAL REPORT FLOW CYTOMETRY: LYMPHOCYTE SUBSET ANALYSIS SURVEY 2016/3 IPH/Flow cytometry/59 Expertise, service provision and customer relations Quality of medical laboratories J. Wytsmanstreet, 14 1050 Brussels Belgium www.wiv-isp.be

ISSN: 2294-3498 COMMITTEE OF EXPERTS IPH (secretariat) TEL: 02/642.55.21/22 FAX: 02/642.56.45 Scheme coordinator: Dr. Van Blerk M. Alternate coordinator: Dr. Vernelen K. TEL: e-mail: TEL: e-mail: 02/642.53.83 mvanblerk@wiv-isp.be 02/642.55.29 kvernelen@wiv-isp.be Experts Dr. Bossuyt X. TEL: 016/34.70.09 FAX: 016/34.70.42 e-mail: xavier.bossuyt@uz.kuleuven.ac.be Dr. Chatelain B. TEL: 081/42.32.43 FAX: 081/42.32.04 e-mail: bernard.chatelain@uclouvain.be Dr. De Schouwer P. TEL: 03/217.73.24 FAX: 03/217.78.12 e-mail: pieter.deschouwer@zna.be Dr. Gothot A. TEL: 04/366.82.20 FAX: 04/366.73.94 e-mail: agothot@ulg.ac.be Dr. Hougardy N. TEL: 063/23.16.30 FAX: 063/23.17.61 e-mail: nicolas.hougardy@vivalia.be Dr. Kestens L. TEL: 03/345.52.29 FAX: 03/247.63.33 e-mail: lkestens@itg.be Dr. Kornreich A. TEL: 071/10.75.79 FAX: 071/10.72.40 e-mail: anne.kornreich@ghdc.be Dr. Mullier F. TEL: 081/42.49.86 FAX: 081/42.32.04 e-mail: francois.mullier@uclouvain.be Dr. Pradier O. TEL: 02/555.36.51 FAX: 02/555.44.99 e-mail: olivier.pradier@erasme.ulb.ac.be Dr. Van Bockstaele D. TEL: 015/34.21.11 FAX: 015/34.21.47 e-mail: vanbocd@labcorp.com Dr. Vander Meeren S. TEL: 02/477.50.73 FAX: 02/477.50.63 e-mail: sam.vandermeeren@uzbrussel.be Dr. Willemse J. TEL: 014/44.40.84 FAX: 014/43.69.59 e-mail: johan.willemse@azturnhout.be Committee of experts: 17/01/2017 Authorisation to release report: by Marjan Van Blerk, scheme coordinator, on 27/01/2017. All the reports are also available on our webpage: https://www.wiv-isp.be/qml/activities/external_quality/rapports/_nl/rapports_annee.htm https://www.wiv-isp.be/qml/activities/external_quality/rapports/_fr/rapports_annee.htm FORM 43/124/E v7. 2/41

TABLE OF CONTENTS Interpretation of the individual report 4 Sample material 7 Participation 9 Results 10 Next survey 41 FORM 43/124/E v7. 3/41

INTERPRETATION OF THE INDIVIDUAL REPORT Besides this global report, an individual report is at your disposal via toolkit. Below you can find information to help you interpreting this report. The position of your quantitative results is presented on the one hand in comparison with the results from all the participants and on the other hand in comparison with the results of the laboratories using your method. Following information is provided: Your result (R) Your method Global median (M g ): central value of the results obtained by all laboratories (all methods together). Global standard deviation (SD g ): measure of the spread of the results obtained by all laboratories (all methods together). Global median of your method (Mm): central value of the results obtained by the laboratories using your method. Standard deviation of your method (SD m ): measure of the spread of the results obtained by the laboratories using your method. The coefficient of variation CV (expressed in %) for all laboratories and for the laboratories using your method: CV m = (SD m / M m ) * 100 (%) and CV g = (SD g / M g ) * 100 (%). Z score: difference between your result and the median of your method (expressed as a number of SD): Z m = (R - M m ) / SD m and Z g = (R - M g ) / SD g. The result is flagged when Z m > 3. U score: relative deviation of your result from the median of your method (expressed in %): U m = ((R - M m ) / M m ) * 100 (%) and U g = ((R - M g ) / M g ) * 100 (%). The result is flagged when U m > d, where d is a parameter-dependent fixed limit, namely the percentage maximal deviation from the method median. A graphical interpretation of the position of your result (R) towards the results of all the participants as well as the results of the participants using your method, based on the method of Tukey, for each parameter and for each analyzed sample. R : your result M m/g : median H m/g : percentiles 25 and 75 I m/g : internal limits (M ± 2.7 SD) O m/g : external limits (M ± 4.7 SD) FORM 43/124/E v7. 4/41

The global graph and the one of your method are presented on the same scale, which allows you to compare them. These graphs give you a rough estimation of the position of your result (R) with respect to the medians (M m/g ). More information can be found in 3 brochures available on our website (only in Dutch and French): http://www.wiv-isp.be/qml/index_nl.htm https://www.wiv-isp.be/qml/index_fr.htm (choose brochures in the menu) or directly on the following webpage (only in Dutch and French): http://www.wiv-isp.be/qml/activities/external_quality/brochures/_nl/brochures.htm https://www.wiv-isp.be/qml/activities/external_quality/brochures/_fr/brochures.htm 1. Informatiebrochure over de externe kwaliteitsevaluatieprogramma's voor klinische laboratoria (Algemene informatiebrochure over de externe evaluatie)/ Brochure d information sur les programmes d évaluation externe de la qualité pour les laboratoires cliniques (Brochure d information générale sur l évaluation externe). 2. Statistische brochure (Algemene statistische berekeningsprocedure opgesteld door Professor Albert)/ Brochure statistique (Procédure générale de calcul statistique mis au point par le professeur Albert). 3. Verwerking van gecensureerde waarden (Statistische berekeningsprocedure toegepast op de gecensureerde waarden opgesteld door Professor Albert)/ Traitement des valeurs censurées (Procédure de calcul statistique appliquée aux valeurs censurées rédigée par le Professeur Albert). FORM 43/124/E v7. 5/41

Graphical representation Besides the tables with the results a Box and whisker plot is added. It contains the following elements for the methods with at least 6 participants: a rectangle ranging from percentile 25 (P 25 ) to percentile 75 (P 75 ) a central line representing the median of the results (P 50 ) a lower limit showing the smallest value x > P 25-1.5 * (P 75 - P 25 ) an upper limit representing the largest value x < P 75 + 1.5 * (P 75 - P 25 ) all points outside this interval are represented by a dot. O = P 75 + 3 * (P 75-P 25) I = P 75 + 1.5 * (P 75-P 25) x < P 75 + 1.5 * (P 75 -P 25 ) LIMITS OF TUKEY H M H I = P 25-1.5 * (P 75-P 25) P 50 P 75 P 25 x > P 25-1.5 * (P 75 -P 25 ) < value < quantification limit O = P 25-3 * (P 75-P 25) O I H M H I O M - 4.7σ M - 2.7σ P 25 P 75 M + 2.7σ M + 4.7σ Corresponding limits in case of normal distribution FORM 43/124/E v7. 6/41

SAMPLE MATERIAL Three blood samples (FC 14822, FC 14823, and FC 14824) collected on K 2 EDTA were sent to the laboratories. Two of these samples were identical (FC 14822/FC 14823). The sample material was collected from 2 healthy and voluntary blood donors at the Dienst voor het Bloed and distributed into aliquots at the Institute of Public Health (IPH, WIV-ISP). The samples were sent by Taxipost 24h and the laboratories were informed by e-mail of the send-out of the control material (day 0). The samples tested negative for HIV 1 and 2, hepatitis B surface antigen, hepatitis C and syphilis. Homogeneity was confirmed by hematocrit determination. Control analysis on the day of collection and distribution yielded the following results (UZ Brussel): FC 14822 % 10 9 /L Leukocytes 4.5 Lymphocytes 42.6 CD3 + cells 76.9 1.470 CD4 + CD3 + cells 53.4 1.020 CD8 + CD3 + cells 24.4 0.470 CD19 + cells 8.1 0.160 NK cells 11.0 0.210 κ % B lymphocytes 54.2 λ % B lymphocytes 45.8 κ/λ ratio 1.18 FC 14823 % 10 9 /L Leukocytes 4.4 Lymphocytes 41.6 CD3 + cells 77.4 1.420 CD4 + CD3 + cells 51.8 0.950 CD8 + CD3 + cells 24.9 0.460 CD19 + cells 8.3 0.150 NK cells 9.8 0.180 κ % B lymphocytes 54.2 λ % B lymphocytes 45.8 κ/λ ratio 1.18 FORM 43/124/E v7. 7/41

FC 14824 % 10 9 /L Leukocytes 4.8 Lymphocytes 30.1 CD3 + cells 73.0 1.050 CD4 + CD3 + cells 42.7 0.620 CD8 + CD3 + cells 28.0 0.400 CD19 + cells 12.9 0.190 NK cells 11.2 0.160 κ % B lymphocytes 62.6 λ % B lymphocytes 37.3 κ/λ ratio 1.68 FORM 43/124/E v7. 8/41

PARTICIPATION Forty-eight laboratories (1 Latvian, 1 Canadian, 1 clinical trial laboratory and 45 Belgian clinical laboratories) participated in the survey 2016/3 (send-out of blood samples: 21 st of November 2016 (day 0)). FORM 43/124/E v7. 9/41

RESULTS Due to a problem with the sample delivery to the laboratories by Taxipost 24h, almost all Flemish laboratories received the blood samples only on day 2 (n=22). All other Belgian participants received the blood samples on day 1 (n=23). 53.3% of the Belgian laboratories (n=24) performed the analyses on day 1, 40.0% on day 2 (n=18), 4.4% on day 3 (n=2) and 2.2% on day 4 (n=1). Since the samples are fresh and not stabilised, it is extremely important to perform sample testing as soon as possible upon receipt. Statistics for the evaluation are solely based on the results of the Belgian clinical laboratories (n=45). Statistics for the evaluation of the WBC count, the percentage of lymphocytes by haematology analyser as well as the absolute counts for the different lymphocyte subsets are solely based on the results of the Belgian clinical laboratories that performed the analyses on day 1 or 2 (n=42). Given the problem with the sample delivery, about half of the laboratories were able to analyse the samples only on day 2. To test for the influence of an eventual sample instability, the results obtained on day 1 and day 2 have been compared with each other. No significant difference in flagging rates (Z-scores >3 or <-3) were observed between the results obtained on day 1 compared to day 2. FORM 43/124/E v7. 10/41

The following tables shows the medians and coefficients of variation obtained by the Belgian clinical laboratories for the samples FC 14822/FC 14823 and FC 14824: FC 14822/FC 14823 Median SD CV,% N 14822 14823 14822 14823 14822 14823 14822 14823 Leukocytes 10 9 /L 4.23 4.23 0.15 0.17 3.5 4.0 41 41 Lymphocytes % Haematology analyser Lymphocytes % Flow cytometer 41.0 41.4 1.4 1.6 3.4 3.8 40 40 40.7 41.1 2.9 2.2 7.1 5.4 36 36 CD3 % 81.4 81.4 1.1 1.7 1.4 2.1 45 45 CD3 10 9 /L 1.420 1.430 0.088 0.088 6.2 6.2 42 42 CD4 % 55.7 55.7 1.2 1.3 2.1 2.3 45 45 CD4 10 9 /L 0.984 0.970 0.065 0.087 6.6 8.9 42 42 CD8 % 24.5 24.7 1.0 1.3 3.9 5.4 45 45 CD8 10 9 /L 0.436 0.434 0.036 0.036 8.1 8.2 42 42 CD19 % 7.8 7.9 0.7 0.7 8.5 8.4 44 44 CD19 10 9 /L 0.140 0.136 0.015 0.014 10.6 10.3 41 41 NK cells % 9.7 9.7 0.7 0.9 7.6 9.2 44 44 NK cells 10 9 /L 0.170 0.168 0.015 0.024 8.7 14.1 41 41 κ % B lymphocytes 55.1 54.2 1.4 3.0 2.6 5.5 38 38 λ % B lymphocytes 43.4 43.2 4.7 3.9 10.9 9.0 38 38 κ/λ ratio 1.28 1.22 0.20 0.15 15.4 12.4 38 38 κ+λ % B lymphocytes 99.4 98.9 4.0 2.9 4.0 2.9 38 38 Lymphosum 99.4 99.3 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 44 44 FORM 43/124/E v7. 11/41

FC 14824 Median SD CV,% N Leukocytes 10 9 /L 4.50 0.16 3.5 41 Lymphocytes % Haematology analyser Lymphocytes % Flow cytometer 30.4 1.5 4.9 40 28.8 1.8 6.2 36 CD3 % 76.0 1.3 1.8 45 CD3 10 9 /L 1.016 0.109 10.7 42 CD4 % 44.7 1.7 3.8 45 CD4 10 9 /L 0.597 0.067 11.3 42 CD8 % 29.9 1.8 5.9 45 CD8 10 9 /L 0.400 0.041 10.2 42 CD19 % 12.4 1.3 10.1 44 CD19 10 9 /L 0.164 0.026 15.8 41 NK cells % 10.5 1.6 14.8 44 NK cells 10 9 /L 0.144 0.018 12.3 41 κ % B lymphocytes 63.6 2.8 4.5 38 λ % B lymphocytes 35.3 2.1 6.1 38 κ/λ ratio 1.78 0.18 10.4 38 κ+λ % B lymphocytes 99.2 3.5 3.5 38 Lymphosum 99.1 0.8 0.8 44 FORM 43/124/E v7. 12/41

WBC FORM 43/124/E v7. 13/41

Lymphocytes Haematology analyser FORM 43/124/E v7. 14/41

Lymphocytes Flow cytometer FORM 43/124/E v7. 15/41

WBC 10E9/L Lymphocytes % Haematology analyser Lymphocytes % Flow cytometer FORM 43/124/E v7. 16/41

CD3% FORM 43/124/E v7. 17/41

CD3 FORM 43/124/E v7. 18/41

CD3 % CD3 10E9/L FORM 43/124/E v7. 19/41

CD4% FORM 43/124/E v7. 20/41

CD4 FORM 43/124/E v7. 21/41

CD4 % CD4 10E9/L FORM 43/124/E v7. 22/41

CD8% FORM 43/124/E v7. 23/41

CD8 FORM 43/124/E v7. 24/41

CD8 % CD8 10E9/L FORM 43/124/E v7. 25/41

CD19% FORM 43/124/E v7. 26/41

CD19 FORM 43/124/E v7. 27/41

CD19 % CD19 10E9/L FORM 43/124/E v7. 28/41

NK% FORM 43/124/E v7. 29/41

NK FORM 43/124/E v7. 30/41

NK % NK 10E9/L FORM 43/124/E v7. 31/41

FORM 43/124/E v7. 32/41 κ

FORM 43/124/E v7. 33/41 λ

κ/λ ratio FORM 43/124/E v7. 34/41

κ % B lymphocytes λ % B lymphocytes κ/λ ratio v FORM 43/124/E v7. 35/41

Sum κ+λ FORM 43/124/E v7. 36/41

Lymphosum FORM 43/124/E v7. 37/41

Sum κ + λ % B lymphocytes Lymphosum For technical validation purposes it is worth noting that in non-pathological peripheral blood of adults the sum of kappa and lambda (expressed as a % of CD19+ B-cells) should be between 90 and 110. The lymphosum (sum of CD3 + % plus CD19 + % plus CD3 - CD16 + and/or CD56 + %) should equal the purity of the lymphocytes in the gate ± 5%, with a maximum variability of 10%. FORM 43/124/E v7. 38/41

Following figures represent the box-and-whisker plots of the differences between the duplicate samples FC 14822 and FC 14823 expressed towards their mean. 41 42 42 42 41 41 38 40 30 20 10 0-10 -20 WBC CD3 CD4 CD8 CD19 NK Kappa/lambda % Results not represented on the graph Parameter Result, % CD3-119.1 CD3 11.9 CD4-137.1 CD4-13.3 CD4 43.9 CD8-98.7 CD8-17.2 CD19-16.0 CD19 15.8 NK -31.0 NK 31.4 NK 35.5 FORM 43/124/E v7. 39/41

40 34 45 45 45 44 44 38 38 38 44 20 10 0-10 -20 Ly HA Ly FC CD3 % CD4 % CD8 % CD19 % NK% Kappa Lambda Kappa+lambda Lymphosum % Results not represented on the graph Parameter Result, % Ly FC -18.7 Ly FC -13.1 Ly FC -11.3 Ly FC 9.8 Ly FC 9.9 CD3 % -119.0 CD3 % 6.0 CD4 % -137.1 CD4 % -14.4 CD4 % 7.5 CD8 % -99.2 CD8 % -12.5 NK% -25.9 NK% 24.8 NK% 36.0 Lambda -25.1 Kappa+lambda 5.4 Kappa+lambda -4.2 Kappa+lambda -3.6 Kappa+lambda -3.2 Kappa+lambda -2.3 Kappa+lambda -2.1 Kappa+lambda -1.7 Kappa+lambda 2.0 Kappa+lambda 2.6 Kappa+lambda 5.3 Lymphosum -85.9 Lymphosum -1.8 Lymphosum -1.4 Lymphosum -1.1 Lymphosum 0.9 Lymphosum 1.0 Lymphosum 1.0 Lymphosum 1.5 Lymphosum 1.5 Lymphosum 5.2 FORM 43/124/E v7. 40/41

NEXT SURVEY The next survey is scheduled for the 13 th of February 2017. END Scientific Institute of Public Health, Brussels 2017. This report may not be reproduced, published or distributed without the consent of the WIV-ISP. FORM 43/124/E v7. 41/41