Safety and efficacy results in the EWOLUTION all-comers LAA closure study: DAPT subgroup

Similar documents
William A. Gray MD System Chief of Cardiovascular Services, Main Line Health President, Lankenau Heart Institute Wynnewood, Pennsylvania USA

THINK OUTSIDE THE PILLBOX

Left Atrial Appendage Closure 4 questions Who? When? How? Results?

Primary Care Atrial Fibrillation Update: Anticoagulation and Left Atrial Appendage Occlusion. Greg Francisco, MD, FACC

Manuel Castellá Cardiovascular Surgery Hospital Clínic, Universidad de

Left Atrial Appendage Occlusion

Secondary Preven-on of Thromboembolic Stroke: Clinical Data and Recommenda-ons from the ESC Atrial Fibrilla-on Guideline Update 2012

Continuing Cardiology Education

The Poor Long-Term Candidate for Warfarin: NOAC or Left Atrial Appendage Closure?

ESC Congress 2012, Munich

Update in Left Atrial Appendage Closure Devices. Faisal Al-Samadi MBBS, FRCPC, FACP, FACC, FSCAI, FHRS

Page 1. Current Trends in the Management of Atrial Fibrillation: Left Atrial Appendage Occlusion. Atrial fibrillation: Scope of the problem

Left Atrial Appendage Occlusion in the Era of Novel Anticoagulants

Left atrial appendage occlusion

Left Atrial Appendage Closure Devices. Atrial Fibrillation 10/11/2017

Atrial Fibrillaiton and Heart Failure: Anticoagulation therapy in all cases?

NOACs in AF. Dr Fiona Stewart. Auckland Heart Group and Auckland DHB

Left Atrial Appendage Closure for Atrial Fibrillation 2015 UPDATE

Management of Patients with Atrial Fibrillation and Stents: Is Three Drugs Too Many?

PCI in Patients with AF Optimizing Oral Anticoagulation Regimen

8th Emirates Cardiac Society Congress in collaboration with ACC Middle East Conference Dubai: October Acute Coronary Syndromes

Evaluate Risk of Stroke & Bleeding in AF Patients

NOACs Update PD Dr. Jan Steffel Leitender Arzt, Klinik für Kardiologie Co-Leiter Rhythmologie Universitätsspital Zürich

A Patient Unsuitable for VKA Treatment

קוים מנחים לפרפור פרוזדורים - עדכון משה סויסה מרכז רפואי קפלן

Left Atrial Appendage Occlusion: Shutting Out Embolic Disease Without Anticoagulation

NOAs for stroke prevention in Atrial Fibrillation: potential advantages in the elderly patients. Giancarlo Agnelli

Controversies in Risk Stratification

Left Atrial Appendage Closure in SCRIPPS CLINIC

Modern aspects in multidisciplinary thromboembolic prophylaxis. AMPLATZER Left Atrial Appendage data update

Watchman Implantation Case Presentation and Discussion

Devices to Protect Against Stroke in Atrial Fibrillation

Stratificazione del rischio, corretto bilancio tra ischemia e bleeding: il beneficio clinico netto

Trick or Treat 2: A New Era of Stroke Prevention in AF? WATCHMAN and LARIAT?

Occlusion de l'auricule gauche: Niche ou réel avenir? D Gras, MD, Nantes, France

Triple Therapy After PCI in AF: A Quagmire Soon to be Drained

Left Atrial Appendage Closure

Percutaneous Left Atrial appendage occlusion and anticoagulation therapy Nicolas Lellouche, MD, PhD

Left atrium appendage closure: A new technique for patients at high hemorrhagic risk

ANTI-THROMBOTIC THERAPY in NON-VALVULAR ATRIAL FIBRILLATION

Atrial fibrillation and advanced age

What the general cardiologist should know about arrhythmia Stroke prevention in AF" Peter Ammann Kantonsspital St. Gallen

Left Atrial Appendage Closure: The Rationale

Stroke Prevention in AF: How will it change in the next 5 years? Jeff Healey MD, MSc, FHRS Population Health Research Institute McMaster University

Appendage Closure. Jason Rogers, MD. Director, Interventional Cardiology UC Davis Medical Center Sacramento, California

2012 focussed update of the ESC Guidelines for the Management of Atrial Fibrillation

Combined catheter ablation and left atrial appendage closure as a. treatment of atrial fibrillation

Left Atrial Appendage Closure: Neurological events

Atrial fibrillation (AF) affects approximately 33 million

NUOVI ANTICOAGULANTI NELL ANZIANO: indicazioni e controindicazioni. Mario Cavazza Medicina d Urgenza Pronto Soccorso AOU di Bologna

Patients selection criteria for LAA occlusion. Young Keun On, MD, PhD, FHRS Samsung Medical Center Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine

controversies in anticoagulation: optimizing outcome for atrial fibrillation

Apixaban for Atrial Fibrillation in Patients with End-Stage Renal Disease on Dialysis

DIRECT ORAL ANTICOAGULANTS

MODULE 1: Stroke Prevention in Atrial Fibrillation Benjamin Bell, MD, FRCPC

Indications of Anticoagulants; Which Agent to Use for Your Patient? Marc Carrier MD MSc FRCPC Thrombosis Program Ottawa Hospital Research Institute

New options in Stroke Prevention in AF Paul Dorian University of Toronto St Michael s Hospital

SCA ST- : recommandations européennes 2015 La durée de la bithérapie : à géométrie variable?

Stable CAD, Elective Stenting and AFib

Edoxaban in Atrial Fibrillation

Study design: multicenter, randomized, open-label trial following a PROBE design

NOACs in AF. Dr Colin Edwards Auckland Heart Group and Waitemata DHB. Dr Fiona Stewart Auckland Heart Group and Auckland DHB

Antithrombotic Efficacy and Safety of Dabigatran Etexilate

Watchman. Left Atrial Appendage Closure Device. Uniquely engineered for the LAA 1-3 with proven safety and longterm efficacy. 4-8

NEW APPROACHES AND NEW ANTICOAGULANTS FOR ATRIAL FIBRILLATION

Watchman a Stroke Prevention Technology for Patients with Atrial Fibrillation

Left Atrial Appendage Closure Techniques: 2015

Antithrombotic therapy in the ACS patient with atrial fibrillation

Fred Kusumoto Professor of Medicine

PREVAIL: 5-Year Outcomes From a Randomized Trial of Left Atrial Appendage Closure vs Medical Therapy in Patients With Nonvalvular Atrial Fibrillation

Clinical and Economic Value of Rivaroxaban in Coronary Artery Disease

Live in a Box: Left Atrial Appendage Closure Device

Controversies in Risk Stratification

ATRIAL FIBRILLATION: REVISITING CONTROVERSIES IN AN ERA OF INNOVATION

Dabigatran Evidence in Real Practice

The Challenge. Warfarin or Novel Oral Anti-Coagulants in the PCI patient? Anticoagulation/Stroke

Patient with high risk for bleeding

Anti-thromboticthrombotic drugs

Cryptogenic Stroke: A logical approach to a common clinical problem

ADC Slides for Presentation 02/10/2017

6 th ACC-SHA Joint Meeting Jeddah, Saudi Arabia

Anticoagulant therapy, coumadines or direct antithrombins

Dual Antiplatelet Therapy Made Practical

Antithrombotics in Stroke management

8/16/2016. Disclosures. Is Uninterrupted OAC Standard of Care for AF Ablation? CHRS 2016, San Francisco. Risk of Stroke Peri-Ablation

TRIPLE THERAPY, NOACs with concurrent indication for DAPT. Paul Wright Lead Cardiac Pharmacist The Heart, UCLH NHS Foundation Trust

Exclusion de l auricule gauche par voie percutanée

CARDIOLOGY GRAND ROUNDS

Left Atrial Appendage Closure: Techniques and Guidelines. Mohammad Shenasa, MD Heart & Rhythm Medical Group San Jose, CA

When and how to combine antiplatelet agents and anticoagulant?

Technology Assessment Report No. 302

Peri-cardioversion and peri-ablation anticoagulation. Giuseppe Patti Campus Bio-Medico University of Rome

Left Atrial Appendage Closure: Moving Beyond Blood Thinners to Prevent Stroke in Atrial Fibrillation October 29, 2016

Management of Atrial Fibrillation. Leon Ptaszek, MD, PhD, FACC, FHRS 25 March 2018

Atrial Fibrillation. Atrial Fibrillation

Medical Policy An independent licensee of the Blue Cross Blue Shield Association

Modern management of atrial fibrillation, from blood pressure control to anticoagulation

심방세동과최신항응고요법 RACE II AFFIRM 항응고치료는왜중요한가? Rhythm control. Rate control. Anticoagulation 남기병 서울아산병원내과. Clinical Impact of Atrial Fibrillation

WHICH ANTITHROMBOTIC REGIMEN? Action Study Group Institut de Cardiologie - Pitié-Salpêtrière Hospital Paris, France.

Left-Atrial Appendage Closure Devices for Stroke Prevention in Atrial Fibrillation

Transcription:

Safety and efficacy results in the EWOLUTION all-comers LAA closure study: DAPT subgroup Martin W. Bergmann, Hüseyin Ince, Stephan Kische, Thomas Schmitz, Felix Meincke, Boris Schmidt, David Foley, Timothy R. Betts, Marek Grygier, Alexey V. Protopopov, Kenneth M. Stein, Lucas V.A. Boersma on behalf of the EWOLUTION investigators

Potential conflicts of interest Speaker's name: Martin W. Bergmann I have the following potential conflicts of interest to report: Receipt of grants / research supports: Boston Scientific Receipt of honoraria or consultation fees: Bayer AG, Boston Scientific, DAIICHI SANKYO and ELI-LILLY, St. Jude Medical

Background ESC Guidelines atrial fibrillation 2016: platelet inhibition is ineffective in stroke prevention ESC Guidelines atrial fibrillation 2016: IIB recommendation for LAA closure as stroke prevention in AFib patients when long-term oral anticoagulation is contraindicated Randomized trials on WATCHMAN (PROTECT-AF, PREVAIL) vs. OAC showing non-inferiority included warfarin-eligible patients Safety and efficacy of LAA closure in warfarin-ineligible patients less well studied Prospective, multi-center, all-comers EWOLUTION registry captures current practice in Europe with WATCHMAN implantation 1-year safety and efficacy in the EWOLUTION DAPT subgroup allows to judge on stroke prevention following LAA closure in the absence of oral anticoagulation

Informed consent obtained: N = 1025 EWOLUTION: patient flow to 1 year Boersma et al. presented at HRS 2017 Anatomy considered not suitable at prescreening: N = 5 EuroPCR presentation DAPT treatment after LAA closure Implant of WATCHMAN: N = 1020 Study population Implant of WATCHMAN: N = 605 DAPT subgroup Patients with successful Watchman implant: N = 1005 Patients with successful Watchman implant: N = 605 End of study < 1 year (N = 112) Deceased: N = 91 Withdrawn: N = 8 Lost-to-FU: N = 13 End of study < 1 year (N = 75) Deceased: N = 58 Withdrawn: N = 6 Lost-to-FU: N = 11 Active Pts @ 1 year: N = 893/1005 (89%) Pts with TEE: N = 875/1005 (87%) Pts with > 11m of data: 804/893 (91%) Active Pts @ 1 year: N = 530/605 (88%) Pts with TEE: N = 525/605 (87%) Pts with > 11m of data: 473/530 (90%)

Patient characteristics in EWOLUTION DAPT subgroup DAPT n=605 Number of subjects 605 11 months follow-up available 90% Age 80yrs old 31.1% OAC contraindicated 83.8% CHA 2 DS 2 -VASc score (mean+/- SEM) 4.6± 1.6 CHA 2 DS 2 -VASc score 3 n=540 (89%) HAS-BLED score (mean +/- SEM) 2.4 ± 1.2

EWOLUTION DAPT subgroup device thrombus 4.0% TEE follow-up N=525 pts (87%) 96% Clean Thrombus DAPT n=605 Follow-up TEE 525/605 (87%) Effective seal* @ first TEE follow-up > 4 weeks 99.2% Thrombus on the device at follow-up TEE** 4.0%, n=22 stroke/tia in patients with thrombus 1

Medication switch after WATCHMAN LAA occluder therapy followed by DAPT therapy Time to DAPT Discontinuation DAPT discontinuation 250 200 237 196 71% 17% 150 100 50 0 87 36 0-3m 3-6m 6m - 1 yr > 1 yr 5% switch to single APT stay in DAPT switch to no meds transient switch to (N)OAC 7%

% pts on DAPT Duration of DAPT therapy: 3, 6 or 12 months days

survival % pts on probability DAPT Safety: major bleeding events @ 1 year DAPT n=605 Major Bleeding SAEs 2.5% (19/770 PY ) Major Bleeding SAEs excluding procedural < 7days 2.1% (16/772 PY) Fatal bleeding 0.5% (4/782 PY) days

Safety of LAA-occluder therapy: SAE at one year SAE type pulmonary/ COPD DAPT n=605 n=28 pts without SAEs heart failure n=23 major bleeding n=21 AF morbidity n=15 infection n=11 69% 15% 9% unrelated - resolved unrelated - with sequelae related - resolved renal function n=11 coronary artery disease n=10 1.1% 5% 0.3% related - with sequelae death for unknown cause

6% 5% Safety: major bleeding events @ 1 year compared to HAS-BLED Expected, based on HAS-BLED* Observed in EWOLUTION 5.1% 5.1% 4% 3% RR 52% RR 60% 2% 1% 2.5% 2.1% 0% Major Bleeding Major Bleeding Excl. Procedural *Effectiveness in bleeding reduction vs. estimated under VKA therapy for comparable HAS-BLED scores based on Lip et al. JACC 2011

survival probability Efficacy: ischemic stroke @ 1 year DAPT n=605 Ischemic Stroke SAEs 1.4% (11/775 PY) Ischemic Stroke/TIA/Systemic Embolism 1.8% (14/771 PY) Haemorrhagic stroke n=0 Fatal stroke n = 0 Disabling stroke n=1 days

12% 10% 8% 6% 4% Efficacy: thromboembolic events @ 1 year compared to CHA 2 DS 2 -VASc w/o OAC Expected, based on CHA2DS2-VASc* Observed in EWOLUTION 7.5% RR 81% 10.5% RR 83% 2% 0% Ischemic Stroke 1.4% 1.8% Ischemic Stroke/TIA/SE all events occurred in patients with CHA 2 DS 2 -VASc 3 *Effectiveness in stroke reduction vs. estimated in the absence of therapy for comparable CHA 2 DS 2 -VASc scores based on Friberg et al. EHJ 2012

Efficacy: comparison to apixaban in patients with CHA 2 DS 2 -VASc 3 Observed in EWOLUTION DAPT group (N=540) 2.5% Observed in ARISTOTLE* Apixaban subgroup Observed in ARISTOTLE* Warfarin subgroup 2.0% 1.5% 1.61% 1.48% 2.03% 1.0% 0.5% 0.0% Stroke per 100 pt-years

Conclusion One year outcome data following LAA closure with the WATCHMAN device find a safety profile as low as other left atrial procedures Bleeding with DAPT most relevant SAE alternatives to DAPT in OAC ineligible patients during the first three months? Efficacy regarding stroke prevention in this high-risk, mostly OAC-ineligible patient cohort similar to randomized trials with OAC eligible patients Stroke rate in EWOLUTION DAPT subgroup similar to ARISTOTLE subgroup CHA 2 DS 2 -VASc 3 2016 ESC Guidelines on atrial fibrillation recommending LAA closure for patients contraindicated for adequate (N)OAC therapy supported by EWOLUTION one-year results

Backup Safety: Major bleeding compared to apixaban 5.0% 4.5% 4.0% 3.5% 3.0% 2.5% 2.0% 1.5% 1.0% 0.5% 0.0% 0.00% Observed in EWOLUTION DAPT group Observed in ARISTOTLE* Apixaban group Observed in ARISTOTLE* Warfarin group 1.36% 2.16% 2.76% 2.25% 3.23% 3.75% 3.46% 4.70% HAS-BLED = 0-1 HAS-BLED = 2 HAS-BLED 3 *Lopes et al. Lancet 2016

Backup: Duration of DAPT therapy comparison of 3 vs. 6 months No significant difference found in safety/efficacy endpoints between the short/long DAPT strategy Thromboembolic events: P=0.94 Major Bleeding: P = 0.06 CV or unexplained death: P = 0.17

Backup: Mortality in DAPT subgroup of EWOLUTION Mortality cardiovascular 2.6% Alive 90.4% non cardiovascular 5.8% unknown 1.2%