Campylobacter spp. and Yersinia enterocolitica in Growing Pigs in Iowa and North Carolina: A Pilot Study

Similar documents
Lairage is a hazard for Salmonella contamination in the pork chain

Occurrence of Campylobacter spp. in Cecal Contents Among Commercial Broilers in Iceland

Risk Factors for Sporadic Campylobacter Infections: Results of a Case-Control Study in Southeastern Norway

Antimicrobial effects of Pseudomonas aeruginosa on survival of Campylobacter jejuni on poultry meat

Adam Aragon Lisa Onischuk Paul Torres NM DOH, Scientific Laboratory Division

FOOD SAFETY. USDA Should Take Further Action to Reduce Pathogens in Meat and Poultry Products

Campylobacter: the actual status and control options

Introduction. Future U.S. initiatives regarding the food safety for fresh produce. FoodNet Partners. FoodNet Partners

Campylobacter ENTERITIS SURVEILLANCE PROTOCOL

Official Journal of the European Union. (Non-legislative acts) REGULATIONS

Food Safety. Professor Christine Dodd Division of Food Sciences

In-vitro analysis of the microbial-load in raw meat and finished products

The Costs of Human Salmonellosis Attributable to Pork: A Stochastic Farm-to-Fork Analysis

What is Campylobacter?

Animal Industry Report

Foodborne Disease in the Region of Peel

Food Safety and Inspection Service Research Priorities

Top 8 Pathogens. Print this document and study these pathogens. You will be better prepared to challenge the ADVANCED.fst exam.

CHAPTER 4: DISEASES SPREAD BY FOOD AND WATER

Food Microbiology 101

Waterborne Pathogens from Non-Human Sources and their Public Health Implications

FOODBORNE DISEASES. Why learning foodborne diseases is very important? What do you know about foodborne diseases? What do you want to know more?

Those Pathogens, What You Should Know

Understanding the Public Health Significance of Salmonella. Betsy Booren, Ph.D. Director, Scientific Affairs

The 12 Most Unwanted Bacteria

DISEASE DETECTIVES. Inaugural University of Michigan Science Olympiad Invitational Tournament. Test length: 50 Minutes

Shigella spp. ! Gram negative, rod-shape! Non-motile! Non spore forming bacteria

Nutrition & CSFP: Older Adults. Sheldon Gordon, MS, RD, LD Nutritionist CSFP New Staff State Training January 2010

Alberta Health and Wellness Public Health Notifiable Disease Management Guidelines August 2011

Outbreak Alert! Trends in Foodborne Illness Outbreaks in the United States ( )

The Effects of High Hydrostatic Pressure on Meats

SciFed Food & Dairy Technology Journal Occurrence of Foodborne Pathogens on Conventional and Organic Dairy Farms in New York State

FSIS Salmonella Update

Salmonella Control in Feeder Barns

New publications in Food Microbiology : EN and ISO* standards, FDA-BAM, USDA/FSIS since Nov Reference Progress Scope.

Antibacterial activity and mechanism of ZnO nanoparticles on C. jejuni

Gastrointestinal Disease from 2007 to 2014

Elaboration of Multiannual sampling plan concerning microbiological hazards in food 16/06/2010

AVIAN ZOONOTIC MICROBIAL PATHOGENS WITH SPECIAL REFERENCE TO CAMPYLOBACTER, E. coli AND SALMONELLA IN FREE-RANGE CHICKEN

National FFA Organization 2016 Meats Evaluation & Technology CDE Written Test

Understanding the Public Health Significance of Shiga Toxin-Producing E. coli. Betsy Booren, Ph.D. Director, Scientific Affairs

Food Contamination and Spoilage Food Safety: Managing with the HACCP System Second Edition (245TXT or 245CIN)

USDA s New Shiga Toxin- Producing Escherichia coli Policy. James Hodges Executive Vice President American Meat Institute

A foodborne outbreak of entero-invasive E.coli (EIEC) infection in Italy, April 2012

Produce Food Safety. Understand what you want to prevent

Bacterial Enteric Pathogens: Clostridium difficile, Salmonella, Shigella, Escherichia coli, and others

WYANDOT COUNTY 2016 COMMUNICABLE DISEASE REPORT

Safepork 2015 Conference

Solution BioSciences, Inc. RESEARCH CAPABILITIES

USDA-FSIS Agency Report 2013 Fall Executive Board Meeting Conference for Food Protection

IS VACCINATION OF CATTLE THE ANSWER? WHAT S THE EVIDENCE?

Simplified Modeling Framework for Microbial Food-Safety Risk Assessments

BY ZACHARY MODISPACHER 11 TH GRADE CENTRAL CATHOLIC HIGH SCHOOL

Campylobacter jejuni

Listeria monocytogenes in Food Plants with emphasis on Cold-Smoked Salmon Plants & Dairies. Presented by Rebecca Robertson January 19, 2009

E. coli 0157:H7. By Christopher Tong

Submitted via

Received 21 January 2003/Accepted 28 April 2003

Campylobacter jejuni. !Gram negative, curved rod shape!motile!non spore forming bacteria!obligate microaerophilic bacteria

Producers Strive For Full Value Pigs What About Full-Value Pork?

Stool bench. Cultures: SARAH

Microbial load and prevalence of pathogens on surface of fresh vegetables in local market yards across Junagadh district of Gujarat

EFSA s work on meat inspection. Frank Boelaert BIOMO unit. WAVFH Wallonie-Bruxelles, après-midi d étude, 21 Novembre 2012

2013 Iowa FFA Food Science CDE Food Safety and Sanitation Section

Comparison of Swabs and Tissue for Detection and Characterization of Escherichia coli in Clinical Post-weaning Diarrhea Cases

WYANDOT COUNTY 2016 COMMUNICABLE DISEASE REPORT

BILLING RATES - FY 18/19

Food Safety Risk Management

Foodborne Outbreak Linked to Pork Consumption. Jennifer Koeman, DVM, MSc, MPH, DACVPM National Pork Board

Survival and Growth of Campylobacter fetus subsp. jejuni on Meat and in Cooked Foods

OVERVIEW OF THE USDA ARS & FSIS FRANKFURTER STORAGE STUDY

Survival of Aerobic and Anaerobic Bacteria in

BILLING RATES - FY 17/18

Food Safety for Restaurants: How to Prevent Foodborne Illness, Food Contamination & Lawsuits

21 Oct F. Kasuga

Effect of Cold Temperature on Germicidal Efficacy of Quaternary Ammonium Compound, lodophor, and Chlorine on Listeria

SPP.) SASTOPAM KU BLAKUSPRODUKTOS, LIEME

MA PHIT- Food Certificate Program

Food Safety in Older Adults: Disease Prevention Strategies and Educational Resources. Adam Ghering Public Affairs Specialist USDA - FSIS

Response of Campylobacter jejuni to Sodium Chloride

PART 1 FOODBORNE PATHOGEN SURVEILLANCE AND OUTBREAK INVESTIGATION

Evaluation of Low Temperature Depuration for Reducing Vibrio parahaemolyticus in Oysters

Overview of 2015 Zoonoses Data

Shigella and salmonella

Concern over food safety puts focus on pathogens

Incidence and Public Health Significance of Yersinia enterocolitica in Enugu Urban-Enugu State,Nigeria.

CDC Update Laura G. Brown, Ph.D. National Center for Environmental Health

Advance copy of document submitted to Office Federal Register. May be subject to minor changes.

Better Use of IT Could Minimize the Next Salmonella Egg-idemic

Evaluation of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) colonization in pigs and people that work with pigs in Ontario Veterinary College

Improper Storage. Haley Johnson Skylar Lowden Danielle Brown Luke Hall Jarrett Wyman Block 2

Use of Microbiological Testing and Microbiological Criteria in Regulatory Programs for Meat, Poultry, and Processed Egg Products

Report of the SCIENTIFIC COMMITTEE ON VETERINARY MEASURES RELATING TO PUBLIC HEALTH (SCVPH) BENEFITS AND LIMITATIONS OF

EFFICACY OF AN HERBAL EXTRACT, AT VARIOUS CONCENTRATIONS, ON THE MICROBIOLOGICAL QUALITY OF BROILER CARCASSES AFTER SIMULATED CHILLING 1

Emerging Food Safety Issues: J Scott Weese DVM DVSc DipACVIM

Overview of 2014 Zoonoses Data

Archiving of food samples from restaurants and caterers

A Reference Guide for Foodborne Pathogens 1

33. I will recommend this primer to my colleagues. A. Strongly Agree D. Disagree B. Agree E. Strongly Disagree C. Neither agree nor disagree

Food Safety and Inspection Service ~~ Update ~~

Transcription:

Campylobacter spp. and Yersinia enterocolitica in Growing Pigs in Iowa and North Carolina: A Pilot Study Irene V. Wesley, National Animal Disease Center, Ames, Iowa; James McKean, Iowa State University, Ames, Iowa; Paa Turkson and Peter Davies North Carolina State University, Raleigh, North Carolina; Scott Johnson, National Animal Disease Center, Ames, Iowa; Terry Proescholdt, and George Beran, Iowa State University Ames, Iowa ASL-R1604 Summary and Implications The prevalence of Campylobacter spp. and Yersinia enterocolitica was determined in cohorts of growing pigs on eight swine farms in Iowa and North Carolina. Approximately 60 pigs from each site were periodically sampled from the nursery to slaughter. Both all in/all out and continuous flow production systems were monitored. Overall, when results from the two states are combined, Campylobacter coli was found in the nursery (90%), grower (92.8%) and finisher (90.9%) stages. At slaughter, C. coli was detected overall on 17.1% of carcasses. For Iowa, 83% of ileocaecal lymph nodes yielded Campylobacter. In contrast, Y. enterocolitica was not found in either rectal or tonsilar swabs or in carcass swabs collected from Iowa hogs. Y. enterocolitica was detected in 8.8% (5 of 57) of North Carolina hogs sampled on one occasion; no isolations were made from carcass swabs at slaughter. Introduction Campylobacter jejuni and C. coli both cause human enteritis and are commonly present in livestock. Campylobacter coli, a normal inhabitant of the pig intestine, is found on pork products and causes human bacterial enteritis. Less frequently pigs and pork may harbor C. jejuni. In contrast to the number of foodborne outbreaks attributed to consumption of undercooked poultry contaminated with C. jejuni, only three outbreaks of human campylobacteriosis have been attributed to pork consumption (12,6,4). Based on onset of clinical symptoms, an outbreak in school children in Japan was thought to be caused by vinegared pork contaminated by Campylobacter (12). In a restrospective epidemiological survey in the Netherlands, consumption of pork was identified as a risk factor for human campylobacteriosis (6). In Norway, a case control study indicated that patients in whom Campylobacter was cultured were more likely than controls to have consumed pork sausage (4). In the United States, Campylobacter jejuni is a major cause of human foodborne enteritis. An estimated 2.1 million cases occur annually at an estimated cost of $1 billion. Campylobacter jejuni, Salmonella, E. coli O157:H7, and Listeria monocytogenes account for up to $4.3 billion in losses annually. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention have targeted the reduction of C. jejuni cases (per 100,000 population) in the United States from 50 in 1987 to 25 by year 2000 (Table 1). Traditional Campylobacter isolation procedures require complex media and incubation in environments with low oxygen (microaerobic). Campylobacter jejuni and C. coli are often not differentiated and are simply reported as C. jejuni/c. coli. We have developed a multiplex PCR test to detect and to differentiate C. jejuni and C. coli in livestock feces and foods (Figures 1 and 3). This assay bypasses biochemical tests to distinguish between C. jejuni and C. coli. Healthy pigs harbor pathogenic strains of Yersinia enterocolitica and are regarded as a significant reservoir for human infection. The pathogen has been repeatedly isolated from tonsils, tongue, cheek meat, lymph nodes, rectal swabs, and intestinal tract of healthy pigs (1,2). Yersinia enterocolitica has been incriminated in foodborne outbreaks associated with consumption of pork, including chitterlings (5). The purpose of this pilot study was to track the prevalence of Campylobacter spp. and Y. enterocolitica in pigs from the nursery to slaughter. Materials and Methods Production sites. Representative all in/all out as well as continuous flow production systems were selected from Iowa (total of four farms) and North Carolina (total of four farms). Approximately 60 pigs from each farm (total of 240 pigs per state) were followed from the nursery to slaughter. One loop of rectal feces (~1 gram, Jorgenson Laboratories, Loveland, CO.) and tonsilar swabs in buffered peptone water (9 ml, ph 7.4) were collected at the nursery, grower, and finisher stage, and within 48 hours of slaughter. Samples from North Carolina were shipped overnight on ice for processing. Iowa samples were processed on the day of collection or after overnight refrigeration. At slaughter for the Iowa hogs, ileocaecal lymph nodes were excised. Carcass swabs were collected after the acid wash by using a Nasco Speci-Sponge (18 ounce, Fort Atkinson, WI)

rehydrated in 20-ml buffered peptone water either the morning of sampling or the evening before and refrigerated. The three-point protocol of FSIS, which describes swabbing a 100 cm area from ham, belly and jowls, was used. In addition, tonsils were excised. For the North Carolina hogs, at slaughter, only carcass swabs were collected (as described above) before quick chilling. Bacteriological culture and PCR analysis. Fecal samples were processed for Campylobacter as follows (Figure 1). A fecal loop sample was suspended in 9 ml of buffered peptone water at the collection site. Within 12 hours of collection or, if needed, after overnight refrigeration, an aliquot (300 ml) from the fecal suspension was placed in TranÕs media (12 ml) for enrichment (7) and incubated microaerobically (2 days, 42_C, Forma model 3130 trigas incubator). An aliquot from the fecal suspension (100 ml) was also plated to Campy Cefex agar for the direct detection of Campylobacter. Following TranÕs enrichment, an aliquot (100 _l) was plated to Campy Cefex agar and incubated microaerobically (2 days, 42_C, Forma model 3130 trigas incubator). To harvest bacteria from both direct and enrichment plating, a loopful of bacterial growth from the first quadrant was suspended in 200 ml of TE (ph 8.0). Samples were frozen (-20_C) until processed for C. jejuni and C. coli by using a previously described multiplex PCR assay (3). For Y. enterocolitica, feces and tonsilar swabs were collected in peptone-buffered water (9 ml). A 1 ml aliquot was delivered to 9 ml of ITC and incubated (2 to 3 days at room temperature). DNA was extracted and multiplex PCR assay targeting the ail gene and the yada plasmid-encoded virulence factor was performed (Figure 2). Results and Discussion In previous studies, Campylobacter, primarily C. coli, was easily identified in pig fecal samples via a multiplex PCR (3,11). In that earlier study, fecal samples of swine from 16 major hog-producing states, which represent 91% of the U.S. pork industry, were analyzed. Of 1,051 pig fecal samples examined, 69% were positive for C. coli and 0.28% were positive for C. jejuni (11). In our study, as summarized in Table 2, for Iowa, C. coli was detected in fecal samples collected at the nursery (90.2%), grower (96%), and finisher (93.8%) stages and within 48 hours prior to the slaughter (93.8%). At slaughter, overall C. coli was found in 9% of carcass swabs and in 82.75% of ileocaecal lymph nodes. As summarized in Table 3, for the four North Carolina production sites, overall C. coli was detected at the nursery (89%), grower (89%), and finisher (88%) stages and within 48 hours prior to slaughter (90%). Similar results have been reported in the Netherlands (10). For the North Carolina hogs, C. coli was found on 25.2% of carcass swabs. Ileocaecal lymph nodes were not tested for the North Carolina hogs. When data from carcass swabs collected in Iowa (9%) and North Carolina (25.2%) are averaged (17.1%), the overall prevalence of Campylobacter present on hog carcasses is less than the 33%, reported by FSIS in the national baseline study (9). This may be attributed to differences in carcass sampling methods, or to procedures for Campylobacter isolation. As summarized in Table 3, Y. enterocolitica was not detected at any time in hogs in Iowa but in 8.8% in the North Carolina hogs sampled on one farm on one occasion. It was not detected on carcasses, tonsils, or lymph nodes in Iowa hogs nor on carcass swabs collected from North Carolina. In contrast, using the same techniques as in the Iowa and North Carolina portions of the study, Y. enterocolitica was identified in 81% of tonsils (n=31) collected in Pennsylvania. Acknowledgments We are indebted to Sharon Franklin, and Brad Chriswell, who provided technical support and data analysis for this study. We thank the USDA-Food Safety Inspection Service for partial funding of this project. References 1. de Boer, E. and J.F.M. Nouws. 1991. Slaughter pigs and pork as a source of human pathogenic Yersinia enterocolitica. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 12:2375-378. 2. Funk, J.A., H. F. Troutt, R. E. Isaacson, and C. P. Fossler. 1998. Prevalence of pathogenic Yersinia enterocolitica in groups of swine at slaughter. J. Food Prot. 61:677-682. 3. Harmon, K. M., G. Ransom, and I. V. Wesley. 1996. Differentiation of Campylobacter jejuni and Campylobacter coli by multiplex polymerase chain reaction. Molecular and Cellular Probes 11:195-200. 4. Kapperud, G., E. Skjerve, N. H. Bean, S. M. Ostroff, and J. Laser. 1992. Risk factors for sporadic Campylobacter infections: results of a case-control study in southeastern Norway. J. Clin. Microbiol. 30:3117-3121 5. Lee, LA, A. R. Gerber, D. R. Lonsway, J. D. Smith, G. P. Carter, N. D. Puhr, C. M. Parrish, R. K. Sikes, R. J. Finton, and R. V. Tauxe. 1990. Yersinia enterocolititica 0:3 infections in infants and children, associated with the household preparation of chitterling. N. Engl. J. Med. 322: 984-987 6. Oosterom, J., C. H. den Uyl, J. R. Banffer, and J. Huisman. 1984. Epidemiological investigations on Campylobacter jejuni in households with a primary infection. J. Hyg. Camb. 92:325-332.

7. Tran, T. T. 1998. A blood-free enrichment medium for growing Campylobacter spp. under aerobic conditions. Lett. Appl. Microbiol. 26:145-148. 8. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. 1990. Healthy People 2000. 9. USDA-FSIS. 1996. Nationwide Pork Microbiological Baseline Data Collection Program: Market Hogs, April 1995 - March 1996. 10. Weijtens, M.H.J., J. van der Plas, P. G. Bijker, H. A. Urlings, D. Koster, J. G. van Logtestijn, and J. H. Huis inõt Velt. 1997. The transmission of campylobacter in piggeries: an epidemiological study. J. Appl. Microbiol. 83:693-698. 11. Wesley, I.V. 1997. Helicobacter and Arcobacter: Potential human foodborne pathogens? Trends Food Sci. Technol. 89:293-299. 12. Yanagisawa, S. 1980. Large outbreak of campylobacter enteritis among school children. Lancet 1(8186):153

Figure 1. PCR-based detection of thermotolerant Campylobacter in poultry. (A) Samples are enriched in TranÕs media and then plated to Campy Cefex agar. (B) Bacterial colonies are harvested and processed for PCR. (C) The amplicons are detected by gel electrophoresis. The presence of a 460 bp PCR amplicon) is exhibited by both C. jejuni and C. coli Campylobacter jejuni exhibits both the 450 bp product and a specific smaller 160 bp amplicon. Figure 2. PCR-based detection of Yersinia enterocolitica in pigs. (A) Samples are enriched in ITC media (2 or 3 days at room temperature). (B) DNA is extracted and screened by a PCR assay that is specific for the virulent ail gene (425 bp) and a plasmid-encoded virulence factor, yada (~300 bp). (C) The amplicons are detected by gel electrophoresis. The PCR amplicons are seen only in pathogenic Y. enterocolitica strains.

Table 1. U.S. Public Health Service targeted reductions in major foodborne pathogens. Data are in cases per 100,000 US population (8). Cases (per 100,000) 1987 2000 Campylobacter jejuni 50 25 Salmonella spp. 18 16 E. coli 0157:H7 8 4 L. monocytogenes 0.7 0.5 Table 2. Distribution (%) of Campylobacter in pigs (Iowa). Nursery Grower Finisher Preslaughter Carcass Lymph nodes Farm 1 78 98 98 100 7 70 (16/23) Farm 2 90 96 85 90 0 88 (23/26) Farm 3 100 98 94 ~95 9 85 (29/34) Farm 4 93 92 98 90 20 88 (35/40) AVERAGE 90.2 96 93.8 93.8 9 82.75 Table 3. Distribution (%) of Campylobacter in pigs (North Carolina). Nursery Grower Finisher Preslaughter Carcass Farm 1 77 71 95 97 0 Farm 2 100 97 92 98 21 Farm 3 100 93 83 83 80 Farm 4 80 97 82 82 0 AVERAGE 89.2 89.5 88 90 25.2 Table 4. Summary of Recovery of Y. enterocolitica from pigs State Number of Pigs % Positive Iowa 240 0 North Carolina 240 2.1 Pennsylvania 31 84