Clinical Efficacy and Safety of Achieving Very Low LDL-C Levels With the PCSK9 Inhibitor Evolocumab in the FOURIER Outcomes Trial

Similar documents
MS Sabatine, RP Giugliano, AC Keech, PS Sever, SA Murphy and TR Pedersen, for the FOURIER Steering Committee & Investigators

FOURIER: Enough Evidence to Justify Widespread Use? Did It fulfill Its Expectations?

Effect of the PCSK9 Inhibitor Evolocumab on Cardiovascular Outcomes

Weigh the benefit of statin treatment: LDL & Beyond

Characterization of Types and Sizes of Myocardial Infarction Reduced with Evolocumab in FOURIER

Lipoprotein(a), PCSK9 Inhibition and Cardiovascular Risk: Insights from the FOURIER Trial

LDL Cholesterol Lowering with Evolocumab and Outcomes in Patients with Peripheral Artery Disease: Insights from the FOURIER Trial

Managing Dyslipidemia in Disclosures. Learning Objectives 03/05/2018. Speaker Disclosures

PCSK9 Inhibitors Are They Worth The Money? Michael J. Blaha MD MPH

EBBINGHAUS: - A Cognitive Study of Patients Enrolled in the FOURIER Trial

Making War on Cholesterol with New Weapons: How Low Can We/Should We Go? Shaun Goodman

New Strategies for Lowering LDL - Are They Really Worth It?

Contemporary management of Dyslipidemia

Statins and PCSK9 inhibitors for stroke prevention

Fasting or non fasting?

Does IMPROVE-IT & FOURIER Confirm or Refute the LDL Hypothesis?

THIERS CHAGAS BAHIA FOURIER- ESTUDO DE INIBIÇÃO DA PCSK9 EM PACIENTES DE ALTO RISCO CARDIOVASCULAR

EVIDENCE TO DATE EVOLOCUMAB (REPATHA)

What have We Learned in Dyslipidemia Management Since the Publication of the 2013 ACC/AHA Guideline?

Workshop. Todd Anderson MD / Jacques Genest MD

Cholesterol, guidelines, targets and new medications

Update on Dyslipidemia and Recent Data on Treating the Statin Intolerant Patient

Martin/Hopkins Estimation, Friedewald and Beta- Quantification of LDL-C in Patients in FOURIER

Evolving Concepts on Lipid Management from Ezetimibe (IMPROVE IT) to PCSK9 Inhibitors

PCSK9 antibodies: A new therapeutic option for the treatment of hypercholesterolemia

2013 ACC AHA LIPID GUIDELINE JAY S. FONTE, MD

FOURIER Further cardiovascular OUtcomes Research with PCSK9 Inhibition in subjects with Elevated Risk

Paradim Shift in cholesterol behandeling: van LDL-C target naar LDL-C eradicatie

Update on Lipid Guidelines and Intense Treatment of LDL-C with PCSK9 Inhibitors Carl J. Lavie, MD,FACC,FACP,FCCP

FOURIER. Further cardiovascular OUtcomes Research with PCSK9 Inhibition in subjects with Elevated Risk

Educational Objectives. Disease Trajectories and CVD Risk Reduction. Hypercholesterolemia Support for LDL-C Causality

Alirocumab Treatment Effect Did Not Differ Between Patients With and Without Low HDL-C or High Triglyceride Levels in Phase 3 trials

4 th and Goal To Go How Low Should We Go? :

Indicações para um inibidor de PCSK9

Study 2 ( ) Pivotal Phase 3 Study Top-Line Results. October 29, 2018

PCSK9 Inhibitors and Modulators

Zürcher Herzkurs, New drugs and interactions. LDL - what else?

Dapagliflozin and Outcomes in Patients with Peripheral Artery Disease: Insights from DECLARE-TIMI 58

Study 1 ( ) Pivotal Phase 3 Long-Term Safety Study Top-Line Results

Is Lower Better for LDL or is there a Sweet Spot

Lipids: new drugs, new trials, new guidelines

March 30, 2014, Joint ACC/JAMA Late-breaking Clinical Trials Session 402 American College of Cardiology, Washington DC

Efficacy, Safety and Tolerability of 150 mg Q2W Dose of the PCSK9 mab REGN727/SAR236553: Data from Three Phase 2 Studies

PCSK9 Agents Drug Class Prior Authorization Protocol

THE CRUCIAL PROBLEM OF ASCVD Can New Therapeutic Options Resolve It? THE CRUCIAL PROBLEM OF ASCVD Can New Therapeutic Options Resolve It?

Confusion about guidelines: How should we treat lipids?

CVD risk assessment using risk scores in primary and secondary prevention

Get a Statin or Not? Learning objectives. Presentation overview 4/3/2018. Treatment Strategies in Dyslipidemia Management

The ACCELERATE Trial

Preventing coronary artery disease: Cholesterol or inflammation?

PCSK9 for LDL Cholesterol Reduction: What have we learned from clinical trials?

Lipids: Guidelines & Best Treatment Options

Drug Class Monograph

No relevant financial relationships

Lipid Management 2013 Statin Benefit Groups

Cost-effectiveness of evolocumab (Repatha ) for hypercholesterolemia

Disclosures. Dr. Scirica has also served as a consultant for Lexicon, Arena, Gilead, and Eisai.

LDL cholesterol and cardiovascular outcomes?

Canakinumab Anti-Inflammatory Thrombosis Outcomes Study (CANTOS)

The Clinical Unmet need in the patient with Diabetes and ACS

Challenges in lipid management

The FOURIER Trial. On behalf of the FOURIER Investigators. American Heart Association Scientific Sessions November 13, 2017

The TNT Trial Is It Time to Shift Our Goals in Clinical

Reducing LDL-C with Non- Statin Therapies

Copyright 2017 by Sea Courses Inc.

PCSK9 Inhibitors and Canadian Cardiovascular Lipid Guidelines

The JUPITER trial: What does it tell us? Alice Y.Y. Cheng, MD, FRCPC January 24, 2009

Cholesterol verlaging (om cardiovasculair risico te verlagen)

Managing Lipids and Cardiovascular Risk: Using the Data to Optimize Care

Hyperlipidemia Guidelines: What s New in 2015? Eva Lonn, MD, MSc Professor of Medicine

Lipid Update and Case Studies: Comparing ATP III, AHA/ACC Guidelines and the National Lipid Association Recommendations 2017

PCSK9 Inhibitors: A View of Clinical Studies

What Role do the New PCSK9 Inhibitors Have in Lipid Lowering Treatment?

Landmesser U et al. Eur Heart J 2017; /eurheartj/ehx549

2/26/19. Secondary Cardiovascular Risk Reduction: Incorporating Evolving Data to Individualize Care. Disclosures. Faculty

New ACC/AHA Guidelines on Lipids: Are PCSK9 Inhibitors Poised for a Breakthrough?

Review of guidelines for management of dyslipidemia in diabetic patients

PCSK9 inhibition across a wide spectrum of patients: One size fits all?

Managing Lipids and Cardiovascular Risk: Using the Data to Optimize Care

No relevant financial relationships

Evan A. Stein 1, David Sullivan 2, Anders G. Olsson 3, Rob Scott 4, Jae B. Kim 4, Allen Xue 4, Thomas Liu 4, Scott M. Wasserman 4

Cholesterol Reduction Therapy in 2018 A Perspective Role Of Statins, Ezetimibe and PCSK9-Inhibitors

Disclosure. No relevant financial relationships. Placebo-Controlled Statin Trials

Novel Therapeutic Strategies in Lipid Management: Lowering LDL C to Improve Patient Outcomes

Drug Class Review Proprotein Convertase Subtilisin Kexin type 9 (PCSK9) Inhibitors

Effective Treatment Options With Add-on or Combination Therapy. Christie Ballantyne (USA)

Evolocumab and Clinical Outcomes in Patients with Cardiovascular Disease

Supplemental Online Content 2

How to Handle Statin Intolerance in the High Risk Patient

abstract n engl j med 376;18 nejm.org May 4,

Treating Hyperlipidemias in Adults. Lisa R. Tannock MD Division of Endocrinology and Molecular Medicine, University of Kentucky Lexington KY VAMC

Randomized Comparison of the Safety, Tolerability, and Efficacy of Long-term Administration of AMG 145: 52-Week Results From the OSLER Study

Disclosures. Choosing a Statin/New Therapies. Case. How else would you do to treat him? LDL-C Reduction with Different Statin Strategies

New Horizons in Dyslipidemia Management in Primary Care

Cholesterol; what are the future lipid targets?

Best Lipid Treatments

PCSK9 inhibition in homozygous familial hypercholesterolaemia

Lipids & Hypertension Update

Cost-effectiveness of evolocumab (Repatha ) for primary hypercholesterolemia and mixed dyslipidemia.

Transcription:

Clinical Efficacy and Safety of Achieving Very Low LDL-C Levels With the PCSK9 Inhibitor Evolocumab in the FOURIER Outcomes Trial RP Giugliano, TR Pedersen, AC Keech, PS Sever, JG Park, and MS Sabatine, for the FOURIER Steering Committee & Investigators European Society of Cardiology 2017 Clinical Trial Update I August 28, 2017

Confidential

Trial Design 27,564 stable patients with CV disease (prior MI, stroke or PAD) age 40-85 years; additional CV risk factor(s) Screening, Placebo Run-in, & Lipid Stabilization Effective statin therapy (atorva 20 mg or statin dose ± ezetimibe) LDL-C 1.8 mm non-hdl-c 2.6 mm Evolocumab SC 140 mg Q2W or 420 mg QM RANDOMIZED DOUBLE BLIND Placebo SC Q2W or QM Follow-up Q 12 weeks Sabatine MS et al. Am Heart J 2016;173:94-101

Summary of FOURIER LDL-C (mm) LDL-C by 59% (from 2.4 -> 0.8 [0.5, 1.2] mm) CV outcomes in patients already on statin therapy Evolocumab was safe and well-tolerated 2.5 2.0 1.5 1.0 0.5 0.0 Placebo 59% mean decline P<0.00001 Absolute 1.45 mm (1.42-1.47) Evolocumab Median 0.78 mm IQR [0.49-1.27] 0 4 12 24 48 72 96 120 144 168 Weeks after randomization KM Rate (%) at 3 Years 15 10 5 0 HR 0.85 (0.79-0.92) P<0.0001 14.6 12.6 CV death, MI, stroke, UA, cor revasc Placebo Evolocumab HR 0.80 (0.73-0.88) P<0.00001 9.9 7.9 CV death, MI, stroke Sabatine MS et al. New Engl J Med 2017;376:1713-22

Aims To explore the clinical efficacy and safety associated with progressively lower achieved LDL-C levels

Methods - 1 LDL-C assessed at 4 wks (ultracentrifugation if <1 mm) Analyzed 5 groups by achieved LDL-C at 4 weeks 1) <0.5mM (20 mg/dl) 2) 0.5-1.3 mm (20-49 mg/dl) 3) 1.3-1.8 mm (50-69 mg/dl) 4) 1.8-2.6mM (70-99 mg/dl) 5) >2.6 mm (>100 mg/dl) was the referent group Pooled results across 2 Rx groups (evo, placebo) 1582 pts with events in first 4 wks or no LDL-C at week 4 were excluded

Methods - 2 Prespecified 1 and 2 efficacy composite endpoints 10 safety adverse events evaluated: Serious AE - AE->drug discon - AST/ALT>3x Cancer - cataracts AEs - CK > 5x ULN Hem stroke - Neurocognitive - Non-CV death New onset diabetes (adjudicated by CEC) Cognition 1 assessed using CANTAB tool and pt survey of everyday cognition (ECog) 1. Giugliano RP et al. N Engl J Med 2017377:633-43

Achieved LDL-C at 4 Weeks 6 5 Median [IQR] LDL-C at 4 Weeks Evo 0.8 mm [0.5-1.2] Pbo 2.2 mm [1.9-2.7] 32 mg/dl [21-45] 87 mg/dl [74-104] Percent of Patients 4 3 2 1 0 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 LDL-C at Week 4 (mm) LDL (mm) <0.5 0.5-1.3 1.3-1.8 1.8-2.6 > 2.6 %Evo 99.6% 96.5% 41% 10% 9.6% %Placebo 0.4% 3.5% 59% 90% 90.4%

Baseline Characteristics <0.5 (N=2669) Achieved LDL-C in mm at 4 Weeks 0.5-1.3 (N=8003) 1.3-1.8 (N=3444) 1.8-2.6 (N=7471) >2.6 (N=4395) Age (median), yrs* 64 63 62 63 61 Females* 16 23 27 24 28 Caucasian race* 80 86 84 85 88 Current smoker* 26 27 29 28 32 Prior MI 81 81 80 82 81 Prior stroke 20 19 19 19 20 Prior PAD 12 14 14 12 14 Hypertension 78 80 82 80 81 TIMI Risk Score 2 Prevention* 3.2 3.3 3.4 3.3 3.4 Data shown are % patients unless otherwise specified *P trend <0.0001

Lipids and Lipid Rx at Randomization At Randomization Median Lipid values Achieved LDL-C in mm at 4 Weeks <0.5 (N=2669) 0.5-1.3 (N=8003) 1.3-1.8 (N=3444) 1.8-2.6 (N=7471) >2.6 (N=4395) LDL-C, mm 2.1 2.4 2.2 2.3 3.0 Total cholesterol, mm 4.0 4.3 4.2 4.2 5.0 Triglycerides, mm 1.5 1.5 1.6 1.4 1.6 HDL-C, mm 1.1 1.1 1.1 1.1 1.2 Lipoprotein (a), nm 22 43 32 37 48 High potency statin, % (> Atorvastatin 40 mg/d) 63 69 70 70 72 Ezetimibe, % 4.1 5.0 5.4 4.6 7.4 P trend <0.0001 for each

LDL-C Over Time 4 LDL-cholesterol at 4 weeks in mm <0.5 0.5-1.3 1.3-1.8 1.8-2.6 2.6 Mean LDL-C (mm) 3 2 1 0 0 4 12 24 48 72 96 120 144 168 Weeks After Randomization

CV Death, MI, Stroke, UA, or Coronary Revasc LDL-C (mm) Adj HR (95% CI) <0.5 0.76 (0.64-0.90) 0.5-1.3 0.85 (0.76-0.96) 1.3-1.8 0.94 (0.82-1.09) 1.8-2.6 0.97 (0.86-1.09) > 2.6 referent P = 0.0012 LDL-C (mm) at 4 weeks

CV Death, MI, or Stroke LDL-C (mm) Adj HR (95% CI) <0.5 0.69 (0.56-0.85) 0.5-1.3 0.75 (0.64-0.86) 1.3-1.8 0.87 (0.73-1.04) 1.8-2.6 0.90 (0.78-1.04) > 2.6 referent P = 0.0001 LDL-C (mm) at 4 weeks

Safety Events - 1 25 20 15 % Patients (n/n) % pts Adj P-values for trend >0.10 for each comparison LDL-C (mm) at 4 wks <0.5 0.5-1.3 1.3-1.8 1.8-2.6 2.6 10 5 0 SAE AE->Discon New DM Cancer Cataract

Safety Events - 2 10 % Patients (n/n) % pts LDL-C (mm) at 4wks 5 Adj P-values for trend >0.10 for each comparison <0.5 0.5-1.3 1.3-1.8 1.8-2.6 2.6 0 Neurocog AST/ALT CK Non-CV death Hem stroke

Evaluation of Cognition CANTAB Tests Adj P trend Executive function 0.11 Working memory 0.61 Episodic memory 0.61 Reaction Time 0.47 Global Score 0.30 Everyday Cognition Self Survey Adj P trend Memory 0.11 Executive function 0.12 Planning 0.27 Organization 0.98 Divided attention 0.038 Total Score 0.017 Better scores at lower achieved LDL-C

Exploratory Analysis Pts with LDL-C <0.26 mm (<10 mg/dl) at 4 wks N=504: Median [IQR] LDL-C 0.18 [0.13-0.23] mm = 7 [5-9] mg/dl 15 10 5 Cardiovascular Efficacy Adj HR 0.69 (0.49-0.97) 11.9 P=0.03 7.3 2.6 mm <0.26 mm Adj HR 0.59 (0.37-0.92) P=0.02 7.8 4.4 30 25 20 15 10 5 Adj HR 0.94 (0.74-1.20) P=0.61 23.3 22.8 Safety 2.6 mm <0.26 mm Adj HR 1.08 (0.63-1.85) P=0.78 3.4 3.4 0 CVD, MI, Stroke, UA, Cor Revasc CVD, MI, Stroke 0 Serious adverse event AE -> drug discontinued

Conclusions LDL-C can now be reduced to unprecedented low levels with statin + PCSK9i (<< 1 mm) A strong progressive relationship of achieved LDL-C and CV events seen, down to LDL <0.26 mm (<10 mg/dl) No excess in safety events with very low achieved LDL-C <0.5 mm (<20 mg/dl) at 2.2 years These data suggest that we should target considerably lower LDL-C than is currently recommended for our patients with atherosclerotic CV disease

Further Details Thank you to all the patients, investigators, coordinators, steering and executive committee members of the FOURIER and EBBINGHAUS trials, TIMI CEC, Adverse Events and statistical teams, Cambridge Cognition, and the sponsor, Amgen Article available at www.thelancet.com Slides available at www.timi.org