Apixaban versus Heparin/Vitamin K Antagonist in Anticoagulation-naïve Patients with Atrial Fibrillation Scheduled for Cardioversion: The EMANATE Trial

Similar documents
Cardioversion of AF : Anticoagulation in the Modern Era

Novità in Tema di NOACs Cardioversione Riccardo Cappato, MD

Novel Anticoagulants : Bleeding and Bridging

Is There a Role For Pharmacokinetic/ Pharmacodynamics Guided Dosing For Novel Anticoagulants? Christopher Granger

Engage AF-TIMI 48. Edoxaban in AF: What can we expect? Cardiology Update John Camm. St. George s University of London United Kingdom

ESC Congress 2012, Munich

Rivaroxaban in Arrhythmology from Evidence Based Medicine to Real Life Experience: Patients Undergoing Cardioversion

Old and New Anticoagulants For Stroke Prevention Benefits and Risks

Study design: multicenter, randomized, open-label trial following a PROBE design

Events after discontinuation of randomized treatment at the end of the ARISTOTLE trial

Practical Considerations for Using Oral Anticoagulants in Patients with Chronic Kidney Disease

controversies in anticoagulation: optimizing outcome for atrial fibrillation

Anticoagulation: Novel Agents

Stroke Prevention in AF: How will it change in the next 5 years? Jeff Healey MD, MSc, FHRS Population Health Research Institute McMaster University

Journal of the American College of Cardiology

Edoxaban in Atrial Fibrillation

Oral Anticoagulation Drug Class Prior Authorization Protocol

Atrial Fibrillation. 2 nd Annual National Hospitalist Conference San Antonio, TX September 7, 2018

Edoxaban versus enoxaparin warfarin in patients undergoing cardioversion of atrial fibrillation (ENSURE-AF): a randomised, open-label, phase 3b trial

MODULE 1: Stroke Prevention in Atrial Fibrillation Benjamin Bell, MD, FRCPC

Relationship between Center Time in Therapeutic Range and Comparative Treatment Effect of Rivaroxaban and Warfarin: Results from the ROCKET AF Trial

NOAC trials for AF: A review

Atrial Fibrillation. Alan Bell, MD, CCFP. Staff Physician, Humber River Regional Hospital. University of Toronto

Fibrillazione Atriale Non Valvolare: Come Orientare La Scelta Dei Nuovi Anticoagulanti Orali

IS THERE STILL A PLACE FOR VITAMINE K ANTAGONISTS?

Secondary Preven-on of Thromboembolic Stroke: Clinical Data and Recommenda-ons from the ESC Atrial Fibrilla-on Guideline Update 2012

NUOVI ANTICOAGULANTI NELL ANZIANO: indicazioni e controindicazioni. Mario Cavazza Medicina d Urgenza Pronto Soccorso AOU di Bologna

Will Oral Anticoagulants Continue to Evolve?

ESC Heart & Brain Workshop

NOAs for stroke prevention in Atrial Fibrillation: potential advantages in the elderly patients. Giancarlo Agnelli

Clinical issues which drug for which patient

Thromboembolism During Sinus Rhythm in Patients with a History of Atrial Fibrillation

FINAL CDEC RECOMMENDATION

Kenneth W. Mahaffey, MD and Keith AA Fox, MB ChB

Antithrombotics in Stroke management

RETROSPECTIVE CLAIMS DATABASE STUDIES OF DIRECT ORAL ANTICOAGULANTS (DOACS) FOR STROKE PREVENTION IN NONVALVULAR ATRIAL FIBRILLATION

What s new with DOACs? Defining place in therapy for edoxaban &

Analysing Apixaban: Potential Growth Driver for Pfizer and Bristol Myers Squibb. Tro Kalayjian Chief Medical Analyst Chimera Research Group

Anticoagulation with Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) and advances in peri-procedural interruption of anticoagulation-- Bridging

Special Conditions of NOAC PCI 가톨릭의대 순환기내과 장성원

Let s Gi e The So ethi g To Clot About: Controversies in Anticoagulation

ADC Slides for Presentation 02/10/2017

PCI in Patients with AF Optimizing Oral Anticoagulation Regimen

Contemporary Management of Direct Oral Anticoagulants During Cardioversion and Ablation for Nonvalvular Atrial Fibrillation

Newer Anti-Anginal Agents and Anticoagulants

Digoxin And Mortality in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation With and Without Heart Failure: Does Serum Digoxin Concentration Matter?

The Direct Oral Anticoagulants: Practical Considerations. David Garcia, MD University of Washington Seattle Cancer Care Alliance September 2015

Individual Therapeutic Selection Of Anti-coagulants And Periprocedural. Miguel Valderrábano, MD

MEDICAL ASSISTANCE BULLETIN

Medical Policy An independent licensee of the Blue Cross Blue Shield Association

Stroke Prevention in AF : Old and New. Disclosure

Lessons from recent antithrombotic studies and trials in atrial fibrillation

Drug Class Monograph

Anti-thromboticthrombotic drugs

The Role of NOACs in AF: What do We Know 4 Years After the RE-LY Study?

Indications of Anticoagulants; Which Agent to Use for Your Patient? Marc Carrier MD MSc FRCPC Thrombosis Program Ottawa Hospital Research Institute

Efficacy and Safety of Dabigatran Etexilate vs. Warfarin in Asian RE-LY Patients According to Baseline Renal Function or CHADS2 Score

Left Atrial Appendage Closure 4 questions Who? When? How? Results?

Clinical and Economic Value of Rivaroxaban in Coronary Artery Disease

Thrombosis and Thromboembolsim October Stroke Prevention in Atrial Fibrillation Risk Stratification and Choice of Antithrombotic Therapy

Stable CAD, Elective Stenting and AFib

Direct Oral Anticoagulant Use in Valvular Atrial Fibrillation

Conflict of interest statement

A Clinical Context Report

Increased Levels of D-dimer in Atrial Fibrillation Identify Patients With Higher Risk of Thromboembolic Events and Death

State of the Art in the ACS Atrial Fibrillation Overlap Syndrome

On behalf of the RE-CIRCUIT Investigators. March 19, :45 am 10:55 am. Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, MD, USA.

New options in Stroke Prevention in AF Paul Dorian University of Toronto St Michael s Hospital

On behalf of the RE-CIRCUIT Investigators. March 19, :45 am 10:55 am. Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, MD, USA.

DOACs for Atrial Fibrillation, Why Are So Many AF Patients NOT on Anticoagulation? David Garcia, MD April 2017

Results from RE-LY and RELY-ABLE

Defining Sub-Clinical Atrial Fibrillation and its management

New Aspects in the Diagnosis and Treatment of Atrial Fibrillation: Antithrombotic Therapy

Apixaban for Atrial Fibrillation in Patients with End-Stage Renal Disease on Dialysis

Disclosure. Financial disclosure: National Advisory Board & Research Grant from Boehringer-Ingelheim

Atrial Fibrillation: Risk Stratification and Treatment New Cardiovascular Horizons St. Louis September 19, 2015

Antithrombotic therapy in the ACS patient with atrial fibrillation

Pros and Cons of Individual Agents Based on Large Trial Results: RELY, ROCKET, ARISTOTLE, AVERROES

MEDICAL ASSISTANCE HANDBOOK PRIOR AUTHORIZATION OF PHARMACEUTICAL SERVICES. A. Prescriptions That Require Prior Authorization

AF in Asian: which NOAC to choose for particular patient and at what dose? DEJIA HUANG West China Hospital of Sichuan University, Chengdu, China

Appendage Closure. Jason Rogers, MD. Director, Interventional Cardiology UC Davis Medical Center Sacramento, California

DIRECT ORAL ANTICOAGULANTS

Joshua D. Lenchus, DO, RPh, FACP, SFHM Associate Professor of Medicine and Anesthesiology University of Miami Miller School of Medicine

Αντιπηκτική αγωγή 2017 Νέες μελέτες, πραγματικά δεδομένα και κλινική πράξη

Canadian Society of Internal Medicine Annual Meeting 2016 Montreal, QC

MMS/Mass Coalition Program, Nov. 4, 2008 Patients with AF: Who Should be on Warfarin?

INR as a Biomarker: Anticoagulation in Atrial Fib, Heart Failure, and Cardiovascular Disease Daniel Blanchard, MD, FACC, FAHA

Transient Atrial Fibrillation and Risk of Stroke after Acute Myocardial Infarction

Update on the NOAC s: 2018 Daniel Blanchard, MD, FACC, FAHA

Updates in Stroke Management. Jessica A Starr, PharmD, FCCP, BCPS Associate Clinical Professor Auburn University Harrison School of Pharmacy

Stroke prevention, Clinical trials

NOACs Update PD Dr. Jan Steffel Leitender Arzt, Klinik für Kardiologie Co-Leiter Rhythmologie Universitätsspital Zürich

Cases & Panel Discussion

Abstract. Introduction. imedpub Journals Doson Chua* Research Article. Cardiovascular Investigations: Open Access

Scoring Systems in AF 8/10/2016. Strategies in the Prevention of Atrial Fibrillation-Related Strokes. Overview

Criteri di scelta ed appropriatezza prescrittiva dei nuovi anticoagulanti orali

Ασθενείς με Κολπική Μαρμαρυγή προς καρδιοανάταξη ή κατάλυση. Δεδομένα για την Απιξαμπάνη

ACCP Cardiology PRN Journal Club

8/16/2016. Disclosures. Is Uninterrupted OAC Standard of Care for AF Ablation? CHRS 2016, San Francisco. Risk of Stroke Peri-Ablation

Dabigatran Evidence in Real Practice

Transcription:

Apixaban versus Heparin/Vitamin K Antagonist in Anticoagulation-naïve Patients with Atrial Fibrillation Scheduled for Cardioversion: The EMANATE Trial Michael D. Ezekowitz, Professor, Sidney Kimmel Medical College at Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA and Lankenau Heart Center, Wynnewood, PA and Bryn Mawr Hospital, Bryn Mawr, PA; Co Chair Executive Committee EMANATE on behalf of co-authors Charles V. Pollack, Jonathan L. Halperin, Richard D. England, Sandra VanPelt Nguyen, Judith Spahr, Maria Sudworth, Nilo Cater, Andrei Breazna, Jonas Oldgren, Paulus Kirchhof, for the EMANATE investigators

Disclosures Michael D. Ezekowitz has received consulting fees from Boehringer Ingelheim, Armetheon, Pfizer, Sanofi, Bristol- Myers Squibb, Portola, Daiichi-Sankyo, Medtronic, Johnson & Johnson, and Janssen Scientific Affairs; grant support from Boehringer Ingelheim, Pfizer, and Bristol-Myers Squibb Co-PI PETRO, RE-LY, X-VeRT, EMANATE; Executive Committee ENSURE-AF, ENGAGE-AF.

Background The goal of anticoagulation in the setting of cardioversion is to prevent stroke and systemic embolism without causing bleeding. Post hoc analyses of cardioversions in the RE-LY, ARISTOTLE, ROCKET-AF and ENGAGE-AF trials found low event rates. 1-4 A limitation was the prolonged period of pre-cardioversion anticoagulation. To evaluate more immediate cardioversion, prospective trials comparing rivaroxaban (X-VeRT) 5 and edoxaban (ENSURE-AF) 6 against heparin/vka in patients undergoing cardioversion found comparable efficacy and safety with low event rates. 1. Nagarakanti R, Ezekowitz M, et al. Circulation. 2011;123:131-136. 2. Flaker G, et al. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2014;63:1082-1087. 3. Piccini JP, et al. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2013;61:1998-2006. 4. Plitt A, et al. Clin Cardiol. 2016;39:345-346. 5. Cappato R, Ezekowitz M, et al. Eur Heart J. 2014;35:3346-3355. 6. Goette A, et al. Lancet. 2016;388:1995-2003.

Objectives of EMANATE To prospectively compare the outcomes of stroke, systemic embolism, major bleeding, and clinically relevant non-major (CRNM) bleeding in patients with < 48 hrs anticoagulation who were randomized to apixaban or heparin/vka in an open-label trial with blinded endpoint adjudication. To gain insight into the role of image guidance. To assess the value of a loading dose of apixaban in patients rapidly transitioned to cardioversion.

Key Eligibility Criteria Key Inclusion Criteria Anticoagulation-naïve patients with AF ( <48 hours of parenteral and/or oral anticoagulation) indicated for cardioversion. Key Exclusion Criteria Contraindications to apixaban or heparin/vka Mitral stenosis or previous valve surgery Other conditions requiring anticoagulation Dual antiplatelet therapy

Study Design If not cardioverted follow up was 90 days Treatment begins If cardioverted follow up was 30+/- 7 days Screening/ randomization 1:1 Cardioversion Apixaban 5.0 mg twice daily (2.5 mg BID if down-titrated) Heparin/VKA (usual care) Imaging

Apixaban Loading Dose Option In patients randomized to apixaban, cardioversion could be performed 2 hours after a loading dose of 10 mg (reduced to 5 mg if 2 of the following present: age 80, weight 60 kg, serum creatinine 1.5 mg/dl [133 micromol/l).

Patient Disposition (ITT Population) Randomized (N=1500) Apixaban (n=753) Heparin/VKA (n=747) Died (n=2) Lost to follow-up (n=0) Completed follow-up (n=736, 97.7%) Withdrew consent: refused follow-up* (n=15, 2.0%) Died (n=1) Lost to follow-up (n=1) Completed follow-up (n=730, 97.7%) Withdrew consent, refused follow-up* (n=15, 2.0%) * No outcome events occurred. Mean Follow-up from randomization to withdrawal was 29 days, range 1-83 days Mean Follow-up from randomization to withdrawal was 23 days, range 1-81 days

Key Baseline Patient Demographics All (n=753) Apixaban 5-mg loading dose (n=11) 10-mg loading dose (n=331) Heparin/VKA (n=747) Age, years, mean (SD) 64.7 (12.2) 80.5 (7.4) 63.2 (12.2) 64.5 (12.8) Sex, female, n (%) 248 (32.9) 4 (36.4) 123 (37.2) 250 (33.5) Race, white, n (%) 654 (86.9) 10 (90.9) 322 (97.3) 648 (86.7) Weight, kg, mean (SD) 87.9 (20.6) 69.1 (15.5) 90.2 (21.0) 86.3 (19.8) Hypertension, n (%) 496 (65.9) 9 (81.8) 221 (66.8) 481 (64.4) LVEF <40, n (%) 45 (6.0) 0 21 (6.3) 54 (7.2) Diabetes, n (%) 154 (20.5) 1 (9.1) 75 (22.7) 140 (18.7) CHA 2 DS 2 -VASc score, mean (SD) 2.4 (1.7) 4.4 (1.8) 2.3 (1.7) 2.4 (1.7) Creatinine clearance, ml/min, mean (SD) 79.2 (50.6) 41.0 (13.4) 91.7 (52.1) 78.5 (49.0)

Stroke/Systemic Embolic Outcomes Proportion of patients with stroke/se 0.020 0.015 0.010 0.005 0.000 Apixaban (events: 0/753) Heparin/VKA (events: 6/747) 5 ischemic, 1 hemorrhagic stroke with 0 systemic embolic events P=0.0164 0 30 60 Time to stroke/se (days) Number at risk Apixaban 752 6145 199 55 Heparin/VKA 747 65 231 88 One patient s adjudicated stroke date was one day prior to randomization; thus at Day 0, only 1499 were at risk for stroke. No patients had SE. ITT population. SE = systemic embolism 90

Safety Outcomes (Safety Population*, N=1456) Apixaban Total (n=735) Apixaban Loading Dose Subset (n=342) Heparin/VKA Total (n=721) Major bleeds 3 (1) 6 Clinically relevant 11 (4) 13 non-major bleeds *Randomized and received > 1 dose of study medication (by treatment received).

Image-Guided Strategy (n=840) Thrombus-present (First Image) (n=61) complete follow up, no outcome events Apixaban (n=30) Heparin/VKA (n=31) Actual treatment Apixaban (n=29) Heparin/VKA (n=1) Heparin/VKA (n=31) Repeat Imaging was 37 + 9 days (mean +/-!SD) after first image Repeat Imaging was 37 + 14 days(mean +/-1SD ) after first Image 2 nd View Thrombus (+) (n=11/23) Thrombus (-) (n=12/23) No further imaging (n=6) No further imaging (n=1) Thrombus (+) (n=8/18) Thrombus ( ) (n=10 /18) No further imaging (n=13)

Summary and Conclusion EMANATE evaluated patients scheduled for cardioversion. All received < 48 hrs anticoagulation and 61% were not anticoagulated prior to randomization. There were 0 vs 6 strokes in the apixaban vs heparin/vka group (p=0.0164*), 3 vs 6 major bleeds, 2 vs 1 deaths, and no systemic embolic events in either group. Among 342 patients receiving the loading dose of apixaban, there were 0 strokes, 1 major bleed, and 1 death. Imaging identified left atrial appendage thrombi in 61 patients; all continued anticoagulation. There were no outcome events. Among those with repeat imaging (37 ± 11 days after the initial imaging) thrombi resolved in 52% vs 56% in the apixaban and heparin/vka groups. Limitation: Like the other prospective cardioversion studies, EMANATE was underpowered. We believe the findings observed in EMANATE support the use of apixaban in patients with AF undergoing cardioversion. *log-rank test

The Executive Committee Acknowledge: EMANATE patients and investigators from Belgium, Canada, Denmark, Germany, Israel, Italy, Japan, Korea, Romania, Spain, Sweden, and the United States Members of the Data and Safety Monitoring and Endpoint Adjudication Committees Sponsors: Bristol-Myers Squibb and Pfizer Pharmaceuticals Editorial assistance from Caudex sponsored by Bristol Myers Squibb and Pfizer Pharmaceuticals

BACK UP

Statistical Assumptions Using the ARISTOTLE hypothesis of a non-inferiority margin of 1.38 and accounting for the short follow-up of between 30 and 90 days, and the event rate of 0.75 1.00% we estimated that approximately 40,000 patients would have to be recruited to achieve a statistically valid study.