Aortic Stenosis: Spectrum of Disease, Low Flow/Low Gradient and Variants

Similar documents
Congenital. Unicuspid Bicuspid Quadricuspid

MAKING SENSE OF MODERATE GRADIENTS IN PATIENTS WITH SYMPTOMATIC AORTIC STENOSIS

Dobutamine Stress testing In Low Flow, Low EF, Low Gradient Aortic Stenosis Case Studies

Hemodynamic Assessment. Assessment of Systolic Function Doppler Hemodynamics

Stage of Valvular AS. Outline 10/14/16. Low-flow and Other Challenges to the Assessment of Aortic Stenosis. Severe AS

Aortic Stenosis: LVOT Obstruction

Back to Basics: Common Errors In Quantitation In Everyday Practice

Comprehensive Echo Assessment of Aortic Stenosis

ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY DATA REPORT FORM

Indicator Mild Moderate Severe

Usually we DON T need to go beyond the gradient

Affecting the elderly Requiring new approaches. Echocardiographic Evaluation of Hemodynamic Severity. Increasing prevalence Mostly degenerative

Stress Testing in Valvular Disease

Prosthetic valve dysfunction: stenosis or regurgitation

Quantification of Aortic Regurgitation

DOPPLER HEMODYNAMICS (1) QUANTIFICATION OF PRESSURE GRADIENTS and INTRACARDIAC PRESSURES

Diastolic Heart Function: Applying the New Guidelines Case Studies

Imaging Assessment of Aortic Stenosis/Aortic Regurgitation

Aortic Stenosis: UPDATE Anjan Sinha, MD Krannert Institute of Cardiology

Natural History and Echo Evaluation of Aortic Stenosis

Aortic stenosis aetiology: morphology of calcific AS,

Workshop Facing the challenge of TAVI 2016

ECHO HAWAII. Role of Stress Echo in Valvular Heart Disease. Not only ischemia! Cardiomyopathy. Prosthetic Valve. Diastolic Dysfunction

MITRAL STENOSIS. Joanne Cusack

Echocardiographic Evaluation of Aortic Valve Prosthesis

Appendix II: ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY ANALYSIS

TAVR: Echo Measurements Pre, Post And Intra Procedure

ICE: Echo Core Lab-CRF

ASE Guidelines on Aortic Regurgitation What Do I Measure? Case Studies

G. AORTIC STENOSIS (AS)

Echo Doppler Assessment of Right and Left Ventricular Hemodynamics.

Patient/prosthesis mismatch: how to evaluate and when to act?

LV geometric and functional changes in VHD: How to assess? Mi-Seung Shin M.D., Ph.D. Gachon University Gil Hospital

Normal TTE/TEE Examinations

How to Assess and Treat Obstructive Lesions

Ejection across stenotic aortic valve requires a systolic pressure gradient between the LV and aorta. This places a pressure load on the LV.

Basic Approach to the Echocardiographic Evaluation of Ventricular Diastolic Function

SONOGRAPHER & NURSE LED VALVE CLINICS

Assessment of LV systolic function

Relevant Financial Relationship(s) Off Label Usage. None. None

Spotlight on Valvular Heart Disease Guidelines

Ejection across stenotic aortic valve requires a systolic pressure gradient between the LV and aorta. This places a pressure load on the LV.

P = 4V 2. IVC Dimensions 10/20/2014. Comprehensive Hemodynamic Evaluation by Doppler Echocardiography. The Simplified Bernoulli Equation

Valvular Regurgitation: Can We Do Better Than Colour Doppler?

Echo Assessment Pre-TAVI

Prosthesis-Patient Mismatch or Prosthetic Valve Stenosis?

The Doppler Examination. Katie Twomley, MD Wake Forest Baptist Health - Lexington

Early Surgery in Asymptomatic Severe Aortic Stenosis Pros and Cons

Quantification of Mitral Stenosis: Planimetry, pressure Half time, Continuity Common Errors

TAVR TTE INTERROGATION BY ALAN MATTHEWS

Imaging Guide Echocardiography

좌심실수축기능평가 Cardiac Function

Valvular Heart Disease: Assessment and Timing of Intervention. Graham Cole Consultant Cardiologist Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust

Aortic Valve Practice Guidelines: What Has Changed and What You Need to Know

Nothing to Disclose. Questions. Disclosure Asymptomatic Severe Aortic Stenosis: (When) Should One Intervene? Paul Wood at the Nathanson Lecture, 1958

Martin G. Keane, MD, FASE Temple University School of Medicine

«Paradoxical» low-flow, low-gradient AS with preserved LV function: A Silent Killer

Comprehensive Hemodynamics By Doppler Echocardiography. The Echocardiographic Swan-Ganz Catheter.

British Society of Echocardiography

Aortic Regurgitation & Aorta Evaluation

Low gradient severe aortic stenosis with preserved left ventricular ejection fraction

The production of murmurs is due to 3 main factors:

What are the best diagnostic tools to quantify aortic regurgitation?

Evaluation of Left Ventricular Function and Hypertrophy Gerard P. Aurigemma MD

HEMODYNAMIC ASSESSMENT

Adult Echocardiography Examination Content Outline

Vevo 2100 System Cardio Measurements. Dieter Fuchs, PhD FUJIFILM VisualSonics, Inc.

TSDA Boot Camp September 13-16, Introduction to Aortic Valve Surgery. George L. Hicks, Jr., MD

Role of Stress Echo in Valvular Heart Disease. Satoshi Nakatani Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine Osaka, Japan

NEW GUIDELINES PAGE 9

Tricuspid and Pulmonary Valve Disease

MR echo case. N.Koutsogiannis Department of Cardiology University Hospital Of Patras

History of Stress Testing. Disclosure. Overview. Stress Echocardiography New Applications. and Comparison with Other Stress.

Right Ventricle Steven J. Lester MD, FACC, FRCP(C), FASE Mayo Clinic, Arizona

Valvular Guidelines: The Past, the Present, the Future

Sténose aortique à Bas Débit et Bas Gradient

Aortic Valve Replacement Improves Outcome in Patients with Preserved Ejection Fraction: PRO!

Adel Hasanin Ahmed 1

Marti McCulloch, BS, MBA, RDCS, FASE Houston, Texas

Hypertension in Aortic Valve Disease

Bogdan A. Popescu. University of Medicine and Pharmacy Bucharest, Romania. EAE Course, Bucharest, April 2010

Case Reviews: Hemodynamic Calculations in Valvular Regurgitation

Tricuspid and Pulmonary Valve Disease

PROSTHETIC VALVE BOARD REVIEW

How to assess ischaemic MR?

Ref 1. Ref 2. Ref 3. Ref 4. See graph

Managing the Low Output Low Gradient Aortic Stenosis Patient

Echocardiographic Evaluation of the Cardiomyopathies. Stephanie Coulter, MD, FACC, FASE April, 2016

The production of murmurs is due to 3 main factors:

Aortic Stenosis.

Low Gradient Severe? AS

Valvular Heart Disease. Dr. HANAN ALBACKR

Aortic Valve Stenosis: When stress TTE and/or TEE is required to make the diagnosis and guide treatment

Disclosures Rebecca T. Hahn, MD, FASE

Management of significant asymptomatic aortic stenosis. Alec Vahanian Bichat Hospital University Paris VII Paris, France

Δυναμική υπερηχοκαρδιογραφία στις μυοκαρδιοπάθειες : έχει θέση και ποια ;

Aortic valve Stenosis: Insights in the evaluation of LV function. Erwan DONAL Cardiologie CHU Rennes

Load and Function - Valvular Heart Disease. Tom Marwick, Cardiovascular Imaging Cleveland Clinic

Doppler Basic & Hemodynamic Calculations

Choose the grading of diastolic function in 82 yo woman

Transcription:

Aortic Stenosis: Spectrum of Disease, Low Flow/Low Gradient and Variants Martin G. Keane, MD, FASE Professor of Medicine Lewis Katz School of Medicine at Temple University Basic root structure Parasternal Long Axis View 1

Normal AV M-Mode coaptation in center of aortic root 2

Normal AV orientation and opening Diastole Systole N R L Aortic Stenosis Etiology Senile/Degenerative Calcific Calcification resembles ectopic bone Risk factors similar to those for atherosclerosis Renal dysfunction may accelerate Premature Calcific Bicuspid / Congenital Rheumatic Less common in the United States Less common Type 2 Hyperlipidemia, SLE, Irradiation, Paget s Dz 3

Calcific Aortic Stenosis: Progressive reduction in leaflet motion Spectral Doppler of the AV Apical Five Chamber AS jet AR jet 4

Bicuspid Aortic Valve Most common congenital anomaly (1-2%) Commissure may be horizontal or vertical Horizontal: Anterior and Posterior leaflets Vertical: Right and Left (coronary) leaflets Accel. Calcification premature stenosis Proximal aortopathy (even in normals) Associated abnormalities - coarctation Bicuspid Aortic Valve PLAX View Doming Diastole Systole 5

Bicuspid Aortic Valve PSAX view morphology Diastole Systole raphe raphe Systolic ellipsoid orifice identifies as Rheumatic Aortic Stenosis: Less calcification, More commissural fusion 6

Aortic Valve: Other Anomalies associated with AS Unicuspid AoV Quadracuspid AoV Aortic Stenosis: Physiologic Sequelae Chronic LV pressure overload Myocardial Hypertrophy Progressive, Concentric LA dilatation Progressive diastolic & systolic dysfunction END STAGE: Limited Cardiac Output After long latency SYMPTOMS: Early: Dyspnea and Fatigue (often subtle) Late: Cardinal Symptoms Chest Pressure, Syncope, Congestive Heart Failure 7

Evaluation of AS: Echo Essentials Valve Anatomy - establish etiology Exclude other forms of LVOT obstruction Severity of stenosis Physiologic sequelae LV hypertrophy, diastolic fxn, systolic fxn LA dilatation, Pulmonary hypertension Evaluate concurrent disease Proximal aorta and arch Aortic Valve Regurgitation, Mitral Disease Aortic Stenosis: Assessing Severity Peak AV Jet Velocity Mean AV Gradient Valve Area by continuity equation Velocity Ratio ( Dynamic Index ) Planimetry }ASE / EAE Recommend 8

Aortic Stenosis: Prognosis of Velocity Variable Rate of Progression Avg ~0.3 m/sec/year High rate of events, even for asymptomatic AS Peak Jet Velocity, Rate of velocity change, Functional status: predict clinical outcome Otto C, et al. Circulation (1997) 95:2262 Aortic Stenosis: Peak Velocity Continuous Wave (CW) Doppler in Apical 5 Chamber View Must be parallel to the ejection jet Confirm Right Parasternal Suprasternal also possible Use highest velocity Avoid feathery signals at tip Piedoff non-imaging probe Decrease gains & adjust baseline 18 9

Aortic stenosis Assessment by Peak Velocity Mild stenosis: Moderate stenosis: Severe stenosis: Very Severe or Critical stenosis: 2.0 2.9 m/s 3.0 3.9 m/s > 4.0 m/s > 5.0 m/s Aortic Stenosis: Peak Gradient Peak Gradient = 4 (VAV) 2 Peak Instantaneous Gradient 10

Instantaneous vs. Peak to Peak Echo a more physiologic measurement Doppler peak gradient always higher Doppler Cath Mean gradient and AVA should correlate Gradients are flow dependent Aortic Stenosis: Mean Gradient Mean Gradient Integration of velocity over time Estimate 0.7 * Peak Grad. Correlates with cath Peak-to-Peak gradient 11

Aortic stenosis Assessment by Mean Gradient Mild stenosis: < 20 mmhg Moderate stenosis: 20 39 mmhg Severe stenosis: 40 mmhg Velocity and Gradient pitfall: Influence of Cardiac Output High CO = High gradient Aortic regurgitation Hyperdynamic function Low CO = Low gradient Reduced ejection fraction Small ventricular cavity/lvh High systemic vascular resistance/impedance Significant mitral regurgitation 12

Aortic stenosis Assessment of Valve Area Normal valve area: = 3-4 cm 2 Mild stenosis: > 1.5 cm 2 Moderate stenosis: 1.0 1.5 cm 2 Severe stenosis: < 1.0 cm 2 Critical stenosis: < 0.7 cm 2 Calculation of AV Area: Continuity Equation Based on conservation of mass Flow within LVOT = Flow across AV LVOT area * VTI LVOT = AVA * VTI AV [π * (LVOT radius ) 2 ] * VTI LVOT = AVA * VTI AV [π * (LVOT radius ) 2 ] * VTI LVOT = AVA VTI AV 13

LVOT diameter 2.1 cm Flow through LVOT Pulse Wave Doppler Spectral Envelope With sample volume in LVOT Velocity Time Integral (VTI) flow through a single point VTI = 19 cm 14

Flow Across the Aortic Valve: Continuous Wave Doppler VTI = 85 cm Calculating Aortic Valve Area AVA = (Diameter LVOT / 2) 2 x π x VTI LVOT VTI AV AVA = (2.1 cm / 2) 2 x 3.14 x 19 cm 85 cm AVA = 0.7 cm 2 15

Continuity Equation: Pitfalls LVOT measurement Diameter is squared Can propagate large error LVOT velocity AV velocity Missing the Peak: Use multiple sites / Piedoff / highest velocity Beware MR! Doppler Velocity Index Eliminates errors of LVOT measurement DVI = VTILVOT / VTIAV Criteria for Severe AS: DVI < 0.25 Relatively flow-independent measure of stenosis 16

Planimetry of the Aortic Valve AVA = 1.1 cm 2 Planimetry Correlates with invasively obtained areas Flow dependent Difficult to distinguish decreased opening due to LV failure TEE superior - use of color flow area Dense calcification reduces accuracy 17

Summary Baumgartner H, et al. JASE (2009) 22:1-23 So My patient has severe aortic stenosis! What do I do? Does echo help me? WHEN SHOULD I OPERATE? 18

The Good Old Days: The Symptomatic Cliff Braunwald E, et al. Circulation (1968) 38:61-67 Stages of Disease Stage A: At risk for disease Stage B: Progressive disease Stage C: Severe disease (asymptomatic) Stage D: Severe disease (symptomatic) 19

Stage C can be subdivided: Stage A: At risk for disease Stage B: Progressive disease Stage C1: Severe (asymptomatic) Compensated LV Stage C2: Severe (asymptomatic) Decompensated LV Stage D: Severe disease (symptomatic) O bs e r v e O b s e r v e??? I ntervene I n t e r v e n e Guidelines Assist in Decision-Making Calcified/Thickened leaflets Reduced Systolic Opening Asymptomatic Vmax 5 m/s + low AVR risk Vmax 4 m/s EF <50% EF 50% Undergoing other CV Surgery ETT BP / ex capacity Rapid progression + low AVR risk AVR (IIa) AVR (I) AVR (I) AVR (IIa) AVR (IIb) 20

Low Gradient Aortic Stenosis Peak Velocity 2.74 m/sec Mean Gradient 15 mmhg Calculated AVA 0.5 cm 2 Low Output Low Gradient AS Low Ejection Fraction AVA of 0.5 cm 2, but MG of 15mmHg? WHY? Because low SV (low flow) leads to low gradients Real AS 1 o Prob: Severe obstruction to flow 2 o Prob: Depressed LVEF Improves Pseudo-AS 1 o Prob: Depressed LVEF 2 o Prob: Mild/Mod obstruction is made to look severe by SV with AVR 21

Low Output Low Gradient AS Dobutamine Stress Testing Increase LV contractility -> Increase Stroke Volume Increase Stroke Volume by 20% -> Real AS Peak vel/mean gradient significantly AVA stays unchanged or slightly Pseudo AS Peak vel/mean gradient minimal AVA What if LV contractility / SV don t increase? Low Gradient - Normal EF EF 50%, AVA <1 cm 2, mean grad <40mmHg Whah???... Still a stroke volume problem!! SVindex 35 ml/m 2 despite EF Typical patient: Older, h/o hypertension, women Concentric LVH, small cavity, impaired filling Markedly increased vascular impedance Pibarot P, Dumesnil JG. Heart (2010) 96:1431-33 22

Guidelines Assist in Decision-Making Suspected Low Flow AS Symptoms No Symptoms V max 4 m/s V max <4 m/s EF <50% EF 50% AVR NOT Indicated DSE MG 40mmHg or Pk Vel 4 m/s AVA index 0.6 cm 2 /m 2 and SV index <35 ml/m 2 AVR (I) AVR (IIa) AVR (IIa) Rule Out other causes for Sx!! Thank You! 23