Northwestern University Institutional Review Board (IRB)

Similar documents
Northwestern University Institutional Review Board (IRB)

IRB for Humanists. Naomi E. Coll, MPH, CPH, CIP Manager of Research Integrity

Protecting Human Subjects In Social-Behavioral-Educational Research:

INSTITUTIONAL REVIEW BOARD

IRB, IDEATE, AND HSR. February, 2018 Manuel Gonzalez

Office of Research Compliance. Research Involving Human Subjects

Research Ethics: The Protection of Human Subjects. Presented by: Cindy Morgan Office of Research Integrity

Institutional Review of Research Involving Human Participants. IRB Presentation. University of Central Florida Office of Research & Commercialization

Human Subjects Research: Overview. Colleen Kohashi and Tani Prestage Office for the Protection of Human Subjects (OPHS) February 26, 2016

Human Subjects Protection Specialist October 22 nd, 2010

Institutional Review Boards and Human Subjects Protection

INSTITUTIONAL REVIEW BOARD (IRB) PROCESS AND GUIDELINES FOR CONDUCTING RESEARCH AT ORANGE COAST COLLEGE

Summary of Changes to Human Subjects Regulations: Effective January 21, 2019

REQUIRED INSTITUTIONAL REVIEW BOARD (IRB) EDUCATIONAL READING FOR FLETCHER SCHOOL RESEARCHERS APPLYING FOR EXEMPTION FROM IRB

Research. + Human Subjects Protections for. IRB Review and Approval at UW. October, Bailey Bodell, CIP. Reliance Administrator

1. What is your role in the AAHRPP accreditation process?

*Explain the purpose & role of the IRB *Explain the IRB Review Categories *Discuss the potential risks to research participants

IRB FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS. 1. Who must apply for human subjects review through the IRB (Institutional Research Board)?

IRB GRAND ROUNDS SOCIAL AND BEHAVIORAL RESEARCH: NEED TO KNOW

IRB Red Flags How to Know When IRB Review May Be Needed

Research Involving Human Subjects: Ethics, Process, and Guidance for Streamlining IRB Review

Research Ethics: A Brief Introduction. February 2017 Dina Shafey, Associate Director, ORE

Investigator s Handbook for the Protection of Human Participants in Research Institutional Review Board Revised February 23, 2017

Student Handbook: Making Sense of Human Subjects Research

Informed Consent and Assessment of Capacity to Consent to Research Policy

RESEARCH INVOLVING HUMAN PARTICIPANTS EXPEDITED/FULL APPLICATION

DEFINING RESEARCH WITH HUMAN SUBJECTS - SBE

The AAA statement on Ethnography and Institutional Review Boards (2004) provides a useful working definition:

IRB Reviewer Worksheet for Expedited Reviews

Protection of Research Subjects: The IRB Process

MDCH IRB REVIEW APPLICATION Authority: Code of Federal Regulations Title 45 Part 46

Protection of Human Subjects Policies and Procedures

Type of Review Requested:

COMMUNITY RESEARCH WORKSHOP

SALISBURY UNIVERSITY COMMITTEE ON HUMAN RESEARCH APPLICATION FOR RESEARCH INVOLVING HUMAN SUBJECTS

Guidelines for Ethical Conduct of Behavioral Projects Involving Human Participants by High School Students

EXEMPT RESEARCH. Investigators should contact the IRB Office if there are questions about whether an amendment consists

AN INVESTIGATOR S GUIDE TO RESEARCH WITH HUMAN PARTICIPANTS

HSPC/IRB Description of Research Form (For research projects involving human participants)

BUILDING PRIMARY CARE RESEARCH INFRASTRUCTURE AT YOUR COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTER

TENNESSEE STATE UNIVERSITY HUMAN SUBJECTS COMMITTEE

COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY INSTITUTIONAL REVIEW BOARD GUIDANCE ON ELECTRONIC INFORMED CONSENT

COMMON RULE 2019 IMPLEMENTATION DATE: JANUARY 21, 2019

PROTECTION OF HUMAN SUBJECTS

Ethical Considerations in Operations Research

Phone Numbers: (work) (cell/home) Phone Numbers: (work) (cell/home)

POLICIES AND PROCEDURES FOR RESEARCH INVOLVING HUMAN SUBJECTS ST. MARY'S UNIVERSITY HUMAN SUBJECTS COMMITTEE Institutional Review Board

2

Monika S. Markowitz, PhD, MA, MSN, RN Director, Office of Research Compliance and Education Office of the Vice President for Research

Q5 If there is more than one faculty researcher, then enter co-researchers information (Name, address)

IDENTIFYING, ASSESSING, AND RESOLVING ISSUES IN SOCIAL, BEHAVIORAL, AND EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH (SBER)

Northwestern University. Consent Form and HIPAA Authorization for Research

OHRP - Guidance on Research Involving Coded Private Information or Biological Specimens

Revised Common Rule: Next Steps

Institutional Review Board (IRB) Handbook

BAPTIST HEALTH SOUTH FLORIDA INSTITUTIONAL REVIEW BOARD INVESTIGATOR RESPONSIBILITIES WHEN CONDUCTING HUMAN SUBJECT RESEARCH

APPLICATION TO INVOLVE HUMAN SUBJECTS IN RESEARCH (Form IAUPRIRB-1)

Understanding Minimal Risk in SBR: NRC Recommendations for Proposed Changes to the Common Rule

Your trusted connection to patient communities.

MC IRB Protocol No.:

POLICIES GOVERNING PROCEDURES FOR THE USE OF ANIMALS IN RESEARCH AND TEACHING AT WESTERN WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY and REVIEW OF HUMAN SUBJECT RESEARCH

ETHICS IN CLINCAL RESEARCH A HISTORY OF HUMAN SUBJECT PROTECTIONS AND PRACTICAL IMPLEMENTATION OF ETHICAL STANDARDS

Institutional Review Board Application

Department of the Navy Human Research Protection Program

IRB Research Handbook. Research Compliance The Office of Research and Graduate Studies Southern Methodist University

PHONE SCRIPTS, QUESTIONNAIRES AND WAIVERS OF DOCUMENTATION. Bertha delanda, CIP IRB Training Specialist January 2012

IRB EXPEDITED REVIEW

Balancing benefits and risks of harm in an intimate partner violence and HIV prevention trial: An ethical case study from rural Uganda

Institutional Review Board. Policies and Procedures

INSTITUTIONAL REVIEW BOARD HANDBOOK Guide for Research involving Human Subjects Effective June 2016 with the Implementation of IRBManager

Human Research Participant Protection Program

Michigan Technological University

Revised August 28, 2018

Human Research Protection Program Institutional Review Board Procedure

Human Participants Protection Guidebook. Stephens College 1200 East Broadway Avenue Columbia, Missouri (573)

IRBMED Seminar Series

Collegeof Central Florida Protection of Human Subjects

PROVIDENCE CHRISTIAN COLLEGE INSTITUTIONAL REVIEW BOARD APPLICATION TO USE HUMAN PARTICIPANTS IN RESEARCH

PROJECT TEACH: ETHICS DIDACTIC

Medical research. What is it?

Policy and Procedures. On Use of Human Subjects in Research

IRB policy and procedures 1. Institutional Review Board: Revised Policy and Procedures Elmhurst College

Final Rule Material: New and Revised Definitions

Institutional Review Board (IRB) at SMU. Dr. Maribeth Kuenzi, Chair Ms. Shannon Lunt, SMU Director of Research Compliance

Ethics. A Little History. The Nuremberg Doctors Trial of From Belmont Report

October 2017 INSTITUTIONAL REVIEW BOARD MANUAL

Facilitating IRB Consideration of Protocols Involving Complementary and Alternative Medical Therapies

Kate Gallin Heffernan (Chair) (617) Mark A. Borreliz (617)

University of Windsor, Guidelines for Research Involving Humans University of Windsor. Guidelines for Research Involving Humans

APPLICATION/RESEARCH PROTOCOL REVIEW FORM

Protecting Human Subjects

NIH StrokeNet Network Standard Operating Procedure

Research Ethics Training

Learning Objectives. Ethical Issues in the Digital Age. Disclaimer. Standard VI Technology assisted professional services 3/4/16

Florida A&M University IRB & Investigator Manual

IRB Policy 5 Research Activities

Available at: Bioethics.gov

Ethical Issues Surrounding Electronic Communications

World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki Ethical Principles for Medical Research Involving Human Subjects

RESTORATIVE JUSTICE YOUTH MENTORING PROGRAM: VOLUNTEER MENTOR APPLICATION

Transcription:

Northwestern University Institutional Review Board () Marcella Oliver Education Specialist

Role in Research The sole mission of the is the protection of humans who participate in research.. It is not to annoy researchers.

The structure of the NU

NU Facts >10,000 Submissions a Year 6 Review Boards (2 Campuses) Avg. 655 Studies Reviewed at Panel each Year 60% Biomedical and 40% Social Behavioral

Three administrative areas: Training and Education Human Research Compliance

Northwestern Affiliated Partners Northwestern Medicine (NMFF, NMPG, NMH) Rehabilitation Institute of Chicago LCH Lurie Children s Hospital Research Privacy Board

Why do we need?

Tuskegee Syphilis Study Willowbrook Hepatitis Study Stanford Prison Study University of Minnesota Psychosis Study Source: NIH Office of Extramural Research-Training Modules

But really--why do we need in this day and age? No one can be objective about their own work history bears this out but it is true. People underestimate the risks involved with areas they are very familiar (procedures, CT scans, adding supplements, surveys on sensitive issues, etc.) People overestimate the benefit of things that are important to them.

The evaluation of the conduct of research involves: Codes of Ethics Standards of practice NU HSPP 5.0 Academic / Professional Values Belmont Ethical decision making Moral philosophy Framework for ethical decision making Moral Virtue Legal / Regulatory Standards CFR, FDA, FERPA, HIPAA, MHDDCA, etc.

Ethical Responsibilities Belmont Report (1979): 3 Ethical Principles 1. Respect for Persons 2. Beneficence 3. Justice

Trust is the highest honor and obligation in research

Day-to-day

When Does the Get Involved? When it is Human Research. It s Research when there is a systematic investigation. It s Human Research when there are: Living individual(s) about whom information is collected through intervention or interaction; or Identifiable Private Information When it is a systematic investigation that involves living people or their identifiable information about whom the information collected is intended to develop or contribute to generalizable knowledge the needs to see it. Other resources: Human Research Determination Form (HRP-503) HRP-310 WORKSHEET Human Research Determination

Review Categories Review Type Description Minimal risk Exempt Belmont Principles still apply Does not apply to FDA regulated research unless it falls under Emergency Use Minimal risk, identifiable, more personal information Expedited Reviewed in the office except for vulnerable populations. If expedited reviewer does not approve, the study must go to the full board. Minimal risk research not in exempt or expedited review categories Full Board Research that is more than minimal risk Certain research with vulnerable populations (children, pregnant women, prisoners)

.111 Regulatory Criteria Participant Selection Vulnerable Populations Voluntary Consent Benefits Risks Research Design

Speaking

What the is looking for: 1. Risks to participants are minimized. 2. Risks are reasonable in relation to anticipated benefits. 3. Selection of participants is equitable. 4. Informed consent is sought from each participant and is appropriately documented. 5. The researcher has adequate training and experience and there is not a conflict of interest. 6. Privacy and confidentiality of participants is protected. 7. Additional safeguards are included for vulnerable populations. 8. Data collection is monitored to ensure participant safety. 9. The research methodology is reasonable and will accomplish the purpose of the study. 10. Participants are fully debriefed if deception used.

Special considerations: International Research: Observation, privacy, and boundaries in the field Cultural sensitivity in recruitment, consent and data collection. Data management plan to protect confidentiality. Researching illegal activity When there are two s involved Special considerations with Internet Research: Private v public forum Is it just text or is it a person? Who owns the information on the Internet?

NU Submission Process PI Submits New Application Coordinator Pre-Review Assigned to Reviewer or Panel Approval Criteria Met? Modification Required for Formal Review Changes Requested Post Approval Modifications Continuing Review Reportable new information

Pop Quiz! Which study meets the definition of research with human subjects? a) A physician plans to conduct a study of comments posted on a blog for patients with diabetes. b) A psychologist proposes videotaping interactions between groups of toddlers and their caregivers to determine which intervention methods most effectively manage aggression. c) A grad student proposes asking the director of a local free clinic about the number of patients in the last two years with newly diagnosed HIV/AIDS. d) A university designs an in-house study to improve the mentoring of students with the proposed outcome consisting of a report of recommendations for the department.

Correct Answer: b a) A physician plans to conduct a study of comments posted on a blog for patients with diabetes. (Publicly available info) b) A psychologist proposes videotaping interactions between groups of toddlers and their caregivers to determine which intervention methods most effectively manage aggression. c) A grad student proposes asking the director of a local free clinic about the number of patients in the last two years with newly diagnosed HIV/AIDS. (No human subjects no identifiers collected) d) A university designs an in-house study to improve the mentoring of students with the proposed outcome consisting of a report of recommendations for the department. (Not generalizable knowledge)

Which are the ethical pros and cons of: Recruitment of participants using: 1. Paper flyers or posters posted on bulletin boards 2. Email solicitation 3. Craigslist 4. Facebook

General Contact Information For additional information on submission templates, regulatory guidance, upcoming education/training opportunities, and staff contacts, please visit our website: https://eirbplus.northwestern.edu Main number (BioMedical): 312-503-9338 General queries: irb@northwestern.edu e assistance/queries: eirb@northwestern.edu Compliance queries/issues: irbcompliance@northwestern.edu Training queries/issues: irbtraining@northwestern.edu Social and Behavioral : 847-467-1723

Contact Information Marcella Oliver Education Specialist Northwestern University, Office 312-503-6071 m-oliver2@northwestern.edu