THE COMPARISON OF IMPACT FACTOR AND SELF CITATION

Similar documents
Rank-Normalized Impact Factor: A Way To Compare Journal Performance Across Subject Categories

Journal Impact Factor List 2013

Citation indexes do not reflect methodological quality in lung cancer randomised trials

The feature of papers and citation analysis of eleven journals in tropical medicine indexed by Science Citation Index Expanded

A Method for Comparison of Biomedical Publication Quality Across ISI Discipline Categories

INSPECT Overview and FAQs

Scientometric Analysis of Cognitive Neuroscience Research Literature:

JOURNAL RANKING 2014 FOR BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES

Citation Analysis in the Open Access World

Promotion of the Journal of Exercise Rehabilitation to the international level based on journal metrics

Research performance analysis for the Polish FNP, funding schemes, Poland and benchmark countries /13

Correlation between Self-Citation and Impact Factor in Iranian English Medical Journals in WoS and ISC: A Comparative Approach

Metrics of the Gynecologic Oncology Literature Focused on Cited Utilization and Costs

DOWNLOAD LIST JOURNALS IMPACT FACTOR 2013

SCID518-3 : Journal / researcher evaluation

ELPUB 2010 Helsinki June. Elena Giglia University of Turin

RESEARCH TRENDS IN FORENSIC SCIENCE: A STUDY OF SCIENTOMETRIC ANALYSIS

How are Journal Impact, Prestige and Article Influence Related? An Application to Neuroscience*

SCIENTOMETRIC ANALYSIS OF ARTICLES CONTRIBUTIONS TO WEB OF SCIENCE ON UTERUS CANCER

Sixth International Conference on Webometrics, Informetrics and Scientometrics & Eleventh COLLNET Meeting, October 19 22, 2010, University of Mysore,

PDF # IMPACT FACTOR 2012 PRODUCTS MANUAL DOWNLOAD

Making Inferences from Experiments

Appendix A. Comparison of Research Area (SU) categories and Web of Science Categories (WC)

Color Difference Equations and Their Assessment

DEPARTMENT OF ECONOMICS AND FINANCE COLLEGE OF BUSINESS AND ECONOMICS UNIVERSITY OF CANTERBURY CHRISTCHURCH, NEW ZEALAND

Citation Characteristics of Research Published in Emergency Medicine Versus Other Scientific Journals

INTERNATIONAL PRESTIGE OF SPORTS BIOMECHANICS SERIALS. Duane Knudson and John Ostarello*

Measurement and Descriptive Statistics. Katie Rommel-Esham Education 604

R.A. Owens, N.G. Mast, D.G. Glance, D. McEachern. Presented by: Natalie Mast (09/09/09)

Bird s-eye View of Scientific Trading: A Bibliometric Perspective. SLIS Doctoral Research Forum 2011 Erjia Yan

Field-normalized citation impact indicators and the choice of an appropriate counting method

Visualizing Higher Level Mathematical Concepts Using Computer Graphics

Abstract. Introduction

Journal of Operations Management

Bibliometric Analysis Medicinal and Aromatic Plants Research

Social and Pragmatic Language in Autistic Children

RESEARCH PROJECT. Comparison of searching tools and outcomes of different providers of the Medline database (OVID and PubMed).

WORLD ELECTRONIC JOURNAL IMPACT FACTOR (WEJ IMPACT FACTOR) AS AN ALTERNATIVE TO ISI JOURNAL IMPACT FACTOR (JIF), SCIMAGO JOURNAL RANK

PTNow: Your Clinical Practice Companion. Stay on top of evidence-based research with PTNow, your portal to a wealth of information and tools.

Chapter 3: Examining Relationships

E-BOOK # IMPACT FACTOR REPAIR MANUAL EBOOK

Item-Level Examiner Agreement. A. J. Massey and Nicholas Raikes*

Report of China s innovation increase and research growth in radiation oncology

#5411 Educational Leadership: Administration and Supervision. #5135: Art: Content & Analysis Knowledge. #5101 Business Education: Content Knowledge

Impact Factors of Journals in Sport and Exercise Science,

Finding the appropriate journal to publish in. Sunette Steynberg Department of Library Services

What is an Impact Factor? How variable is the impact factor? Time after publication (Years) Figure 1. Generalized Citation Curve

The Intelligence Controversy

DUAL ENROLLMENT and TRANSFER CREDIT GUIDE

Statistics and Probability

Data and Statistics 101: Key Concepts in the Collection, Analysis, and Application of Child Welfare Data

Publishers responses to Open Access May 9 th 2005

AND ITS VARIOUS DEVICES. Attitude is such an abstract, complex mental set. up that its measurement has remained controversial.

Gender Differences in Synchronous and Diachronous Self-citations Gita Ghiasi *, Vincent Larivière **, Cassidy R. Sugimoto ***

2017 Journal Citation Reports For Endocrine Society Journals

Andreas Ziegler.

I. Identifying the question Define Research Hypothesis and Questions

Accumulating Knowledge through Journals. Barbara Schneider and Ann Owens University of Chicago


4.3 Measures of Variation

Statistics for Psychology

Lung Cancer Research in G7 and BRIC Countries: A Comparative Analysis by Scientometric Method

Group 1. IB Language Choices. Studies in Language and Literature (mother tongue or near-native) Group 2. Language Acquisition

Forecasting trends of development of psychology from a bibliometric perspective

MAPPING THE RESEARCH PRODUCTIVITY OF BANARAS HINDU UNIVERSITY: A SCIENTOMETRIC STUDY

1. Evaluate the methodological quality of a study with the COSMIN checklist

Section I: Multiple Choice Select the best answer for each question. a) 8 b) 9 c) 10 d) 99 e) None of these

The Citation Advantage of Open-Access Articles

Granite State College Schedule (Undergraduate) by Course

Al-Anon Family Group Headquarters, Inc.

Granite State College Schedule (Undergraduate) by Campus

Performance of Malaysian Medical. Journals. Editorial. Abstract. Performance of Malaysian Medical. Introduction

Granite State College Schedule (Undergraduate) by Campus

Granite State College Schedule (Undergraduate) by Course

Study group SBS-AE. Version

Evaluation Process of Journal Articles The New Standardized Journal Impact Factor Percentile (JIFP)

full file at

GMS 6091 Responsible Conduct in Research

Working Paper nº 1501 January, 2015

A Standard for Young People in Therapeutic Community Treatment JAIMIE NORTHAM AND LYNNE MAGOR-BLATCH

Directory of Open Access Journals: A Scientrometric Study of Surgery Journals. Dr. Kotti Thavamani, Ph.D. Regional Medical Library

Correlated to: ACT College Readiness Standards Science (High School)

GENERALIZABILITY AND RELIABILITY: APPROACHES FOR THROUGH-COURSE ASSESSMENTS

Whole Food Nutrition Journal (Standard Process, Volume 2 Number 3)

The Annotated Bibliography A GUIDE FOR STUDENTS

An example of a carbohydrate A) 1 B) 2 C) 3 D) 4

CHAPTER 3 METHOD AND PROCEDURE

CHAPTER-III METHODOLOGY

Google Scholar journal metrics: Comparison with impact factor and SCImago journal rank indicator for nuclear medicine journals

Online Appendix A. A1 Ability

Evaluation of strategic research programs: the case of Danish environmental research

Introduction. Is it enough to change the language? A case study of Croatian biomedical journals

Impact factors of Indian open access journals rising

Module 4 Weeding Out the Grass

Bibliometric analysis of open access research publications. Wanyenda Chilimo

Chapter 1: Explaining Behavior

Dr. James Truman papers relating to the International Dental Journal

Statistical Summaries. Kerala School of MathematicsCourse in Statistics for Scientists. Descriptive Statistics. Summary Statistics

Transcription:

PAPER THE COMPARISON OF IMPACT FACTOR AND SELF CITATION TREND BETWEEN FRENCH AND GERMAN JOURNALS By Mohammad Hossein Biglu mh_biglu@yahoo.com Doctorand at the department of library and Information Science of Humboldt Universität zu Berlin, Germany.. Abstract All French and German journals indexed in the Journal Citation Reports through 2000-2005 were analysed. The study showed that the portion of French journals entering material to the JCR data bank in 2005 counted 1% whereas the portion of German journals at the same time is 4 times higher. From a total number of 6,088 journals in the JCR in 2005, 427 (7%) were published in Germany, 146 (2%) were published in France, The 6,088 journals in the JCR produced 847,114 articles, 50,276 (6%) appeared in the German journals and 13,913 (2%) in French journals. Of the 22,353,992 citations in 2005, 861,190 (4%) came from German journals and 179,585 (1%) came from French journals.analysis of data showed that there is a correlation between total-citation and Impact Factors of German journals as well as French journals indexed in the JCR. 32.9% of all citation by German journals in the JCR in 2005 belong to the 7% of German journals with IF > 3, and 67.1% of total-citation belong to 93% of journals with IF< 3. This correlation is even stronger among French journals, 57% of total citation made by French journals belong to 10% of French journals with IFs >2. From a total number of 433 German journals in 2000 indexed in the JCR, 91% of all population has self-citation rate from 1% to 79%, and from all 427 German journals in 2005, 96% of all population has self-citation rate from 1% to 72%.From a total number of 161 French journals indexed in the JCR in 2000, 82% has self-citation rate from 1% to 100%, and from all 146 French journals in 2005, 86% of all population has self-citation rate from 1% to 79%. The study further showed that the self-citation rates of all German journals in 2000 as well as in 2005 stayed at 12%. The self-citation rate of French journals in 2000 and 2005 are respectively 13% and 12%. The mean French journals IFs in 2005 stays 0.25 more than 2000 whereas the mean German journals IFs in 2005 shows 0.31 increase with compare to the year 2000. Keywords: bibliometrics, Impact Factor, self-citation, JCR, journal citation, German journals, French journals. 143

Introduction Journals Impact factors and the citation behaviours such as self-citation among authors and journals are parameters for evaluation of journals. In fact they are controversy topics among bibliomericans. Even Garfield, the creator of IF didn t expect that it would be one day so controversial. I first mentioned the idea of an impact factor in Science magazine in 1955.That paper is considered the primordial reference for the concept of the Science Citation Index. Five years later, we began the experimental Genetics Citation Index project which led to the publication of the 1961 Science Citation Index. In 1955, it did not occur to me that impact would one day become so controversial. Like nuclear energy, the impact factor is a mixed blessing. I expected it to be used constructively while recognizing that in the wrong hands it might be abused. Since Current Contents, no less SCI, did not exist, it would have been precocious indeed to contemplate the influence of the nascent impact factor. (1) Journals IF depends on two elements: 1. The citations that the journal receive in the fiscal year. 2. The articles that published in the 2 previous years. Although it should be used cautious but on the whole, it is a relatively suitable parameter in the hand of bibliometricians and librarians. Such indicators make it possible to judge relatively fair about the importance of a journal among other journals in the same field. Impact factors are calculated each year by the Institute for Scientific Information for those journals which it indexes, and the factors and indices are published in Journal Citation Reports. Some related values, also calculated and published by the same organization, are: The immediacy index: the average citation number of an article in that year The journal cited half-life: the median age of the articles that were cited in Journal Citation Reports each year. For example, if the A journal's half-life in 2005 is 5, that means the citations from 2001-2005 are 50% of all the citations from that journal in 2005. The aggregate impact factor for a subject category: it is calculated taking into account the number of citations to all journals in the subject category and the number of articles from all the journals in the subject category. (5) How to calculate the Impact Factor of a journal? For example the German journal of BIOCHIMIE in 2005 has an IF equalled to 2.461. It is calculated as the following formula: Number of article published in 2003= 129 (A) Number of article published in 2004= 116 (B) Number of cites in 2005 to articles published in 2003= 445 (C) Number of cites in 2005 to article published in 2004= 158 (D) ( C + D) IF= ( A + B) = (445 + 158) (129 + 116) =2.461 144

The self-citation rate specified as the percentage of the journal self-citation from total citation of the journal in the year of under study. For example the journal of BIOCHIMIE in 2005 was cited 4210 times. Of this 4210 times, 45 times cited by itself. self citation 45 As a result the self-citation rate is: = = 0.01 Total citation 4210 This study endeavours to illustrate and compare the Impact Factor (IF) and self-citation rate of all French and German journals indexed in the JCR in 2000-2005. All journals indicators extracted from the Journal Citation Reports (JCR) science edition. In order to compare the French and German journals characters with all journals indexed in the JCR, the whole journals indexed in the JCR was divided based on IF into three groups: 1. High rank journals, the journals with IF higher than 9.846. 2. Middle rank journals, the journals with IF between 4.352 and 5. 3. Low rank journals, the journals with IF lower than 0.052. The reason of choosing the journals with IF higher than 9.846 as the first group is that after sorting all journals in the JCR in 2005, the first 100 journals IFs levelled higher than 9.846, and the last 100 journals IFs levelled lower than 0.052. In consequence the second group stayed in the JCR between two other groups. To show the trend of IFs for French and German journals, the Impact Factor of all French and German journals indexed in the JCR throughout 2000-2005 were extracted, and the mean IFs was calculated. Analysis of data showed that there is a correlation between total-citation and IFs of French and German journals. 32.9% of all citations by German journals in the JCR in 2005 belong to the 7% of journals with IF > 3, and 67.1% of citations belong to 93% of journals with IF< 3 this correlation is even stronger among French journals, 57% of total citation made by French journals belong to 10% of French journals with IFs >2 (10% of French journals had IF higher than 2, and 90% levelled under 2). The study showed that 82% of all French journals indexed in the JCR has self-citation rate from 1% to 100% in 2000, and 86% of all French journals in 2005 has self-citation rate from 1% to 79%. 91% of all German journals indexed in the JCR in 2000 has self-citation rate from 1% to 79%, and 96% of all population in 2005 has self-citation rate from 1% to 72%. From a total number of 427 German journals indexed in the JCR in 2005, 89% of all population are published in English or multi-language, and only 11% is published in German-language. From 146 French journals in 2005 were 23% published in Frenchlanguage and the rest (77%) were published in English or multi-language. 145

Findings Table1: The portion of German and French journals entering material in the JCR data bank in 2005 Origin of journals No. of percent Articles percent Citations percent journal German journals in the 427 7% 50,276 6% 861,190 4% JCR French journals in the JCR 146 2% 13,913 2% 179,585 1% All journals in the JCR 6,088 100% 847,114 100% 22,353,992 100% As the table 1 indicates, the portion of German journals entering material to the JCR data bank in 2005 counted 4% whereas this portion by French journals is 1%. From a total number of 6088 journals in the JCR, 427 (7%) were published in Germany and 146 (2%) were published in France. The 6088 journals in the JCR produced 847,114 articles, 50,276 (6%) appeared in the German journals, and 13,913 (2%) appeared in French journals. Of the 22,353,992 citations in 2005, 861,190 (4%) came from German journals, whereas 179,585 (1%) came from French journals. as a whole the portion of German journals entering material to the JCR data bank is four times higher than the portion of French journals. IF 1,000 0,800 0,600 0,400 0,200 0,000 The growth of journals IFs (mean value) for all French journals indexed in the JCR 2000-2005 y = 0,0464x - 92,241 R 2 = 0,9542 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 Years Fig.1 The growth of journals IFs (mean value) for all French journals indexed in the JCR 2000-2005 The graph (Fig.1) shows a linear correlation between the mean values of German journals IFs and the year of publication with a correlation coefficient of R=0,976. 146

The growth of German journals IFs( mean value) 2000-2005 IF y = 0,0614x - 121,85 1,400 R 2 = 0,9417 1,200 1,000 0,800 0,600 0,400 0,200 0,000 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 Year Fig.2: The growth of journals IFs (mean value) for all German journals indexed in the JCR 2000-2005 The graph (Fig.2) shows a linear correlation between the mean values of German journals IFs and the year of publication. IF versus total citation of French journals 2005 100000 total citation 10000 1000 100 10 1 0,000 1,000 2,000 3,000 4,000 5,000 Impact Factor Fig.3 Impact Factor versus total citation of French journals in 2005. 147

IF versus total Citation of German journals 2005 100000 Total citation 10000 1000 100 10 1 0,000 1,000 2,000 3,000 4,000 5,000 6,000 7,000 8,000 Impact Factor Fig.4 Impact Factor versus total-citation of German journals in 2005. Table 2: self-citation rate of French journals in 2005 Self-citation rate No. of journals Percent 0-5% 45 30.8 5-10% 36 24.7 10-15% 20 13.7 15-20% 14 9.6 20-25% 15 10.3 25-30% 7 4.8 30-35% 1 0.7 35-40% 2 1.4 40-45% 3 2.1 45-50% 0 0 >50% 3 2.1 Total 146 100 As table 2 indicates 69.18% of all French journals in 2005 have self-citation rate at or more than 5%, and 21.23% of all population has self-citation rate more than 20%. In all 86% of all French journals indexed in the JCR in 2005 has self-citation rate from 1% to 79%. Table 3: self-citation rate of German journals in 2005 Self-citation rate No. of journals Percent 0-5% 100 23.4 5-10% 134 31.38 10-15% 74 17.33 15-20% 53 12.41 20-25% 23 5.39 148

25-30% 19 4.45 30-35% 6 1.41 35-40% 6 1.41 40-45% 5 1.17 45-50% 2 0.47 >50% 5 1.17 Total 427 100.00 As table 3 shows from a total number of 427 German journals indexed in the JCR in 2005, 76.58% has at or more than 5% citation to their own previous literature, and 15.46% of total population has self-citation rate more than 20%. Table 4: The mean self-citation rate and IF of all German journals indexed in the JCR (2000 and 2005) Year No. of self-citation IF journals rate 2000 433 12% 0.98 2005 427 12% 1,29 The mean self-citation rate in 2000 as well as in 2005 is 12% of all citations. The mean all journals IFs in 2005 with compare to the 2000 has 0.31 increased. Table 5: The mean self-citation rate and IF of all French journals indexed in the JCR (2000 and 2005) Year No. of self-citation IF journals rate 2000 162 13% 0.609 2005 146 12% 0.860 As table 5 illustrates the mean IF for French journals in 2005 with compare to 2000 has 0.25 increased.the mean self-citation rate for French journals in 2005 shows 1% decrease with compare to the year 2000. 149

self-citation Rate 100% 0% French journals based on self-citation rank 2000 100% 100% 73% MED MALADIES INFECT ANN FOR SCI INT J TUBERC LUNG D PRAT MED CHIR ANIM POINT VET ANAE JOINT BONE SPINE ESAIM-MATH MODEL NUM 46% 46% 41% 40% 40% Fig.5 French journals based on self-citation rank 2000 As graph 5 shows the journals Esaim-mathematical modelling and numerical analysismodelisation mathematiq and Joint bone spine both of them with 100% self-citation rate followed by the journals of Anae-approche neuropsychologique des apprentissages chez l enfant with 73% self-citation rare get the highest self-citation rank among French journals in 2000. French journals based on self-citation rank 2005 90% 80% 70% 60% 50% 40% 30% 20% 10% 0% 79% 58% 51% 42% 41% 41% POINT VET ALCATEL TELECOMMUN R CR GEOSCI B FR PECHE PISCIC REV MAL RESPIR PROG UROL Fig. 6 : French journals based on self-citation rank 2005 As graph 6 shows the journal of Alcatel telecommunications review With 79% of self-citation rate get the first rank, followed by point veterinaire and revue des maladies respiratoires with 58% and 51% of self-citation rate respectively. 150

The graph (Fig.6) restricted to the six high self-citation rank journals (self-citation rate > 40%). German journals based on self-citation rank 2000 self-citation rate 0,90 0,80 0,70 0,60 0,50 0,40 0,30 0,20 0,10-0,79 0,68 0,63 0,59 0,54 0,54 0,53 0,53 0,45 0,44 0,41 ZKG INT WIRTSCHAFTSINF STRAHLENTHER ONKOL MACROMOL MATER ENG J PLANT NUTR SOIL SC EUR J LIPID SCI TECH WOCHENBL PAPIERFABR SCHMERZ ALTEX-ALTERN TIEREXP ELECTR ENG ZUCKERINDUSTRIE Journals name (abbreviated) Fig. 7: German journals based on self-citation rank 2000 As graph (Fig.7) shows the journal of ZKG international with 79% of self-citation rate get the first rank, followed by Wochenblatt fur papierfabrikation and European journal of lipid science and technology with 68% and 63% of self-citation rate respectively. The graph restricted to the eleven high self-citation rank journals (self-citation rate > 40%). German Journals based on self-citation rank 2005 0,80 0,70 0,72 self-citation rate 0,60 0,50 0,40 0,30 0,20 0,54 0,53 0,50 0,50 0,46 0,45 0,44 0,43 0,42 0,42 0,41 0,10 - STRAHLENTHER ONKOL WOCHENBL PAPIERFABR ULTRASCHALL MED PLASMA PROCESS POLYM GEBURTSH FRAUENHEILK NUKLEARMED-NUCL MED Z PSYCHOSOM PSYC J AGR RURAL DEV TROP WIRTSCHAFTSINF ZKG INT PHYS MED REHAB KUROR NEUROPSYCHIATRIE Journal name (abbreviated) Fig. 8: German journals based on the self-citation rank in 2005 151

As graph (Fig.8) shows the journal of Neuropsychiatrie with 72% of self-citation rate get the first rank followed by Physikalische Medizin Rehabilitationsmedizin Kurortmedizin and ZKG International with 54% and 53% of self-citation rate respectively. The table restricted to the 12 journal with self-citation rate of > 40%. Comparison of total-citation and self-citation for all French journals indexed in the JCR 2000-2005 200000 179585 No. of citation 150000 100000 50000 0 99083 total citation 28808 8976 self-citation 2005 2000 Citation kinds Fig. 10: Comparison of total-citation and self-citation for all French journals indexed in the JCR 2000-2005 As graph (Fig.10) illustrates, the number of total citation in 2005 shows 25% increase with compare to the total citation made by French journals in 2000, and the number of self-citation made by French journals in 2005 shows 16% increase with compare to the self-citation of French journals in 2000. 152

Comparison of total-citation and self-citation for all German journals in the JCR( 2000-2005) 1000000 900000 861190 No. of citation 800000 700000 600000 500000 400000 300000 689533 2005 2000 200000 100000 78073 67498 0 Total citation self-citation Citation kinds Fig.11: Comparison of total citation and self-citation for all German journals indexed in the JCR 2000-2005. As graph (Fig.11) shows, the number of total citation in 2005 shows 19.93% increase with compare to the all German journals citation in 2000.The number of self-citation for all German journals in 2005 shows 13.55% increase with compare to the self-citation of journals in 2000. Table 6: journals self-citation rate for 3 groups of journals in the JCR 2005 IF No. of selected journals Percent of selected journals in the JCR selfcitation rate No. of totalcitations No. of selfcitations totalcitation per journal selfcitation per journal IF > 9.846 100 1.64% 2% 3,255,988 75,497 32,559.88 754.97 4.352< IF > 5 100 1.64% 6% 1,085,570 101,486 10855.70 1014.86 IF < 0.052 100 1.64% 17% 10,613 1,999 106.13 19.99 From all 6,088 number of journals indexed in the JCR in 2005 ascent sorted based on the IF, a total number of 100 journals with highest IF (IF>9.847), 100 journals with middle IF (4.352< IF > 5), and 100 journals with lowest IF (IF<0.052) were chosen in order to compare the total-citation and self-citation behaviours in the JCR. As table 6 indicates, the mean self-citation rate among journals with highest IF is 2% and this rate among the journals with lowest IF is 17%, in other words the self-citation rate among the 153

journals with lowest IFs in the JCR is more than 8 times higher than the self-citation rate of journals with highest IFs. Although the self-citation rate among the journals with highest IFs is 8.5 times lower than the self-citation rate among the journals with lowest IFs, but it should be noticed that mean total citation per journal among journals with highest IFs is 307 time higher than the mean value of total-citation per journal among the journal with lowest IFs. And the mean self-citation per journals among the first group (the journals with highest IFs) is 38 times higher than the later group (the journals with lowest IFs). Therefore it is remarkable to be noticed when it is discussed about the self-citation rate among the journals with high IFs and as well as with low IFs. Table 7: The mean citations rate for all French journals in the JCR 2005 Impact Factor No. of French journals In the JCR Percent in the JCR selfcitation rate No. of totalcitations No. of selfcitations totalcitation per journal selfcitation per journal 0.000 4.223 146 2% 11% 179,585 28,808 1230.03 197.32 As table 7 indicates the French journals IFs levelled between zero and 4.223, the self-citation rate among them is 11% with a mean 1230.03 total-citation and 197.32 self-citation per journals in 2005 Table 8 the mean citations rate for all German journals in the JCR 2005 Impact Factor No. of German journals In the JCR Percent in the JCR selfcitation rate No. of totalcitations No. of selfcitations totalcitation per journal selfcitation per journal 0.000-17.053 427 7% 12% 861,190 78,073 2016.84 182.84 As table 8 indicates the German journals IFs levelled between zero to 17.053, the self-citation rate among them is 12% with a mean 2016.84 total-citation and 182.84 self-citation per journals in 2005. The comparison of table 4 with table 5 indicates that the German and French journals stay between middle rank and low rank of journals in the JCR. Table 9: The growth of citations and IF by French journals 2000-2005 Year No. of journal Total citation Self-citation IF 2000 161 99,083 8,976 0.609 2005 146 179,585 28,808 0.860 Difference -15 80,502 19,832 0,251 The self-citation made by French journals in 2005 shows more than 2 times increase with compare to the year 2000. 154

Table 10: The growth of citations and IF by German journals 2000-2005 Year No. of journal Total citation Self-citation IF 2000 432 689,533 67,498 0.98 2005 427 861,190 78,073 1.29 Difference 5 171,657 10,575 0.31 As table 10 illustrates, total citation in 2005 with compare to the year 2000 shows about 20% increase. The self-citation shows about 14% increase, and the mean IF has 0.31 increased. Table 11: The kind of German journals languages indexed in the JCE in 2005 Language No. of Journal Percent English 237 %56 German-language 48 %11 Multi language 142 %33 Total 427 %100 As table 11 illustrates from a total number of 427 German journals indexed in the JCR in 2005, 89% of them are in English or multi language, and only 11% is in German-language. Table 12 : The kind of French journals languages indexed in the JCE in 2005 language No. of Journals Percent English 38 %26 French-language 34 %23 Multi-language 74 %51 Total 146 %100 As table 12 shows from a total number of 146 French journals indexed in the JCR 34 (23%) of all population were published in French-language and the rest 112 (77%) were published in English or multi-language. Conclusion The study showed that the portion of German journals entering material to the JCR data bank in 2005 counted 4%, whereas this portion by French journals counted 1%.From a total number of 6,088 journals in the JCR in 2005, 427 (7%) were published in Germany, 146 (2%) were published in France, The 6,088 journals in the JCR produced 847,114 articles, 50,276 (6%) appeared in the German journals and 13,913 (2%) in French journals. Of the 22,353,992 citations in 2005, 861,190 (4%) came from German journals and 179,585 (1%) came from French journals. Analysis of data showed that there is a correlation between total-citation and Impact Factors of German journals as well as French journals indexed in the JCR. 32.9% of all citation by German journals in the JCR in 2005 belong to the 7% of journals with IF > 3, and 67.1% of total-citation 155

belong to 93% of journals with IF< 3. This correlation is even stronger among French journals, 57% of total citation made by French journals belong to 10% of French journals with IFs >2. From a total number of 433 German journals in 2000 indexed in the JCR, 91% of all population has self-citation rate from 1% to 79%, and from all 427 German journals in 2005, 96% of all population has self-citation rate from 1% to 72%. From a total number of 161 French journals indexed in the JCR in 2000, 82% has self-citation rate from 1% to 100%, and from all 146 French journals in 2005, 86% of all population has selfcitation rate from 1% to 79%. The study further showed that the self-citation rates of all German journals in 2000 as well as in 2005 stayed at 12%. The self-citation rate of French journals in 2000 and 2005 are respectively 13% and 12%. The mean all German journals IFs in 2005 showed 31% increase with compare to the year 2000. The mean French journals showed 25% increase. The self-citation rate for all German journals in 2000 and 2005 stay at 12%, whereas the selfcitation rate for French journals in 2000 is 13% and in 2005 is 12%. From a total number of 427 German journals indexed in the JCR in 2005, 89 % (379 journals) of all population was published in English or multi-language, and only 11% (48 journals) was published in German-language. From 146 French journals indexed in the JCR in 2005, 34 (23%) were published in Frenchlanguage and 112 (77%) were published in English or multi-language. The other finding of study is that the self-citation rate among the journals with lowest IFs in the JCR are more than 8 times higher than the self-citation rate of journals with highest IFs. The self-citation rate among German journals showed close similarity to the finding of McVeigh, M.E. who found that the self-citation rate for all journals indexed in the JCR in 2002 is a portion of 12.41% (3). REFERENCE 1. Garfield Eugene (2005). The Agony and the Ecstasy The History and ing of the Journal Impact Factor. Retrieved December 28, 2006 from http://www.garfield.library.upenn.edu/papers/jifchicago2005.pdf. 2. Garfield E. (1999). Journal Impact Factor: a brief review, JAMC 19 OCT. 1999. Retrieved December 14, 2006 from http://www.ecmaj.com/cgi/reprint/161/8/979. 3. McVeigh, M.E.(2004): Journal self-citation in the Journal Citation Reports Science edition (2002): A citation study from the Thomson Corporation. The Thomson Corporation. Retrieved October 25, 2006: from http://www.thomsonscientific.com/media/presentrep/essayspdf/selfcitationsinjcr.pdf. 4. ISI web of Knowledge, Journal Citation Reports. Retrieved November 14, 2006 from http://portal.isiknowledge.com/portal.cgi?destapp=jcr&func=frame. 5. Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia. Retrived November 12, 2006 from http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/impact_factor. 156