Edoxaban in Atrial Fibrillation

Similar documents
What s new with DOACs? Defining place in therapy for edoxaban &

Engage AF-TIMI 48. Edoxaban in AF: What can we expect? Cardiology Update John Camm. St. George s University of London United Kingdom

Is There a Role For Pharmacokinetic/ Pharmacodynamics Guided Dosing For Novel Anticoagulants? Christopher Granger

Anticoagulation with Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) and advances in peri-procedural interruption of anticoagulation-- Bridging

Anticoagulation: Novel Agents

Canadian Society of Internal Medicine Annual Meeting 2016 Montreal, QC

CADTH CANADIAN DRUG EXPERT COMMITTEE FINAL RECOMMENDATION

Old and New Anticoagulants For Stroke Prevention Benefits and Risks

DIRECT ORAL ANTICOAGULANTS

NOAs for stroke prevention in Atrial Fibrillation: potential advantages in the elderly patients. Giancarlo Agnelli

NOAC trials for AF: A review

Newer Anti-Anginal Agents and Anticoagulants

Scoring Systems in AF 8/10/2016. Strategies in the Prevention of Atrial Fibrillation-Related Strokes. Overview

Technology appraisal guidance Published: 23 September 2015 nice.org.uk/guidance/ta355

Practical Considerations for Using Oral Anticoagulants in Patients with Chronic Kidney Disease

RETROSPECTIVE CLAIMS DATABASE STUDIES OF DIRECT ORAL ANTICOAGULANTS (DOACS) FOR STROKE PREVENTION IN NONVALVULAR ATRIAL FIBRILLATION

PCI in Patients with AF Optimizing Oral Anticoagulation Regimen

New Anticoagulants Therapies

What evidence is there that variable clinical responses to PK parameters exist for NOACs? What conclusions can we draw from these data?

AF in Asian: which NOAC to choose for particular patient and at what dose? DEJIA HUANG West China Hospital of Sichuan University, Chengdu, China

ESC Congress 2012, Munich

ADC Slides for Presentation 02/10/2017

Benefit-Risk Assessment via Case Studies: Key Considerations & Best Practices

NOACs Update PD Dr. Jan Steffel Leitender Arzt, Klinik für Kardiologie Co-Leiter Rhythmologie Universitätsspital Zürich

Atrial Fibrillation. Alan Bell, MD, CCFP. Staff Physician, Humber River Regional Hospital. University of Toronto

Atrial Fibrillation: Risk Stratification and Treatment New Cardiovascular Horizons St. Louis September 19, 2015

Oral Anticoagulation Drug Class Prior Authorization Protocol

Dabigatran Evidence in Real Practice

Xarelto (rivaroxaban)

6 th ACC-SHA Joint Meeting Jeddah, Saudi Arabia

Anticoagulation Beyond Coumadin

Evidences for real-life use in fragile patients: Renal failure and cancer

controversies in anticoagulation: optimizing outcome for atrial fibrillation

Update on the NOAC s: 2018 Daniel Blanchard, MD, FACC, FAHA

Individual Therapeutic Selection Of Anti-coagulants And Periprocedural. Miguel Valderrábano, MD

Direct Oral Anticoagulants An Update

TSHP 2014 Annual Seminar 1

Novità in Tema di NOACs Cardioversione Riccardo Cappato, MD

Drug Class Monograph

Stepheny Sumrall, FNP, AGACNP Cardiovascular Clinic of Hattiesburg

Stable CAD, Elective Stenting and AFib

Medical Policy An independent licensee of the Blue Cross Blue Shield Association

Observations from Novel Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) Trials for Stroke Prevention in Atrial Fibrillation (SPAF)

Pros and Cons of Individual Agents Based on Large Trial Results: RELY, ROCKET, ARISTOTLE, AVERROES

Results from Hokusai-VTE presented during ESC Congress 2013 Hot Line session and published in the New England Journal of Medicine

Novel Anticoagulants : Bleeding and Bridging

Relationship between Center Time in Therapeutic Range and Comparative Treatment Effect of Rivaroxaban and Warfarin: Results from the ROCKET AF Trial

FINAL CDEC RECOMMENDATION

AF stroke prevention in the Canadian context

Clinical and Economic Value of Rivaroxaban in Coronary Artery Disease

When and how to combine antiplatelet agents and anticoagulant?

The INR: No Need Anymore? Daniel Blanchard, MD Professor of Medicine Director, Cardiology Fellowship Program UCSD Sulpizio Cardiovascular Center

Edoxaban: The newest NOAC option for stroke prevention in AF

Daiichi Sankyo s Once-Daily Lixiana

MODULE 1: Stroke Prevention in Atrial Fibrillation Benjamin Bell, MD, FRCPC

Antithrombotics in the elderly. Robert Gabor Kiss FESC FACC Budapest

NUOVI ANTICOAGULANTI NELL ANZIANO: indicazioni e controindicazioni. Mario Cavazza Medicina d Urgenza Pronto Soccorso AOU di Bologna

Fibrillazione Atriale Non Valvolare: Come Orientare La Scelta Dei Nuovi Anticoagulanti Orali

Role of NOACs in AF Management. From Evidence to Real World Data Focus on Cardioversion

Afib, Stroke, and DOAC. Albert Luo, MD. Cardiology Lindsey Frischmann, DO. Neurology Xiao Cai, MD. HBS

Thrombosis and Thromboembolsim October Stroke Prevention in Atrial Fibrillation Risk Stratification and Choice of Antithrombotic Therapy

Utilizing Anticoagulants for Atrial Fibrillation Related Stroke Prevention

ESC Heart & Brain Workshop

Anticoagulant therapy, coumadines or direct antithrombins

Show Me the Outcomes!

Stroke prevention, Clinical trials

Anticoagulation Therapy in LTC

FACTOR Xa AND PAR-1 BLOCKER : ATLAS-2, APPRAISE-2 & TRACER TRIALS

Left Atrial Appendage Closure 4 questions Who? When? How? Results?

INR as a Biomarker: Anticoagulation in Atrial Fib, Heart Failure, and Cardiovascular Disease Daniel Blanchard, MD, FACC, FAHA

NeuroPI Case Study: Anticoagulant Therapy

Modern management of atrial fibrillation, from blood pressure control to anticoagulation

Efficacy and Safety Outcomes in 8040 Women Compared with Men with Atrial Fibrillation Treated with Edoxaban vs Warfarin for an Average 2.

Clinical issues which drug for which patient

A Patient Unsuitable for VKA Treatment

Study design: multicenter, randomized, open-label trial following a PROBE design

ANTI-THROMBOTIC THERAPY in NON-VALVULAR ATRIAL FIBRILLATION

Αντιπηκτική αγωγή 2017 Νέες μελέτες, πραγματικά δεδομένα και κλινική πράξη

Peer Review Report #2. Novel oral anticoagulants. (1) Does the application adequately address the issue of the public health need for the medicine?

Left Atrial Appendage Occlusion

Joshua D. Lenchus, DO, RPh, FACP, SFHM Associate Professor of Medicine and Anesthesiology University of Miami Miller School of Medicine

Disclosure. Objectives. New Anticoagulants 6/5/2014 GHASSAN HADDAD M.D FHM. South Miami hospital Director of the Anticoagulation clinic.

Defining Sub-Clinical Atrial Fibrillation and its management

New LIXIANA sub-analysis from the ENGAGE AF-TIMI 48 trial presented at the American Heart Association Annual Scientific Sessions 2017

Edoxaban. Direct Xa inhibitor Direct thrombin inhibitor Direct Xa inhibitor Direct Xa inhibitor

NOAC s across indications

Triple Therapy After PCI in AF: A Quagmire Soon to be Drained

Indications of Anticoagulants; Which Agent to Use for Your Patient? Marc Carrier MD MSc FRCPC Thrombosis Program Ottawa Hospital Research Institute

Lessons from recent antithrombotic studies and trials in atrial fibrillation

ACCP Cardiology PRN Journal Club

Left Atrial Appendage Occlusion in the Era of Novel Anticoagulants

Professional Practice Minutes December 7, 2016

Anti-thromboticthrombotic drugs

Contemporary Management of Direct Oral Anticoagulants During Cardioversion and Ablation for Nonvalvular Atrial Fibrillation

Changing Course: Anticoagulation in Secondary Prevention of Cardiovascular Disease Events

Troponin I elevation increases the risk of death and stroke in patients with atrial fibrillation a RE-LY substudy. Ziad Hijazi, MD

Atrial fibrillation and anticoagulation JIR-PING BOEY, DEPARTMENT OF HAEMATOLOGY, FLINDERS MEDICAL CENTRE FEBRUARY 2016

Abbreviated Class Update: Anticoagulants, oral and parenteral

Anticoagulation, atrial fibrillation in elderly patients with chronic kidney disease

Oral Anticoagulants Update. Elizabeth Renner, PharmD, BCPS, BCACP, CACP Outpatient Cardiology and Anticoagulation

Transcription:

Edoxaban in Atrial Fibrillation Glenn Gormley, MD, PhD Senior Executive Officer and Global Head of R&D, Daiichi Sankyo Co., Ltd Nov. 4, 2014 Tuesday

Background Based on the results of ENGAGE AF-TIMI 48, Daiichi Sankyo submitted a New Drug Application on January 8 th, 2014 and is currently seeking approval from the FDA for the use of Edoxaban to reduce the risk of stroke and systemic embolism in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation During its review, FDA indicated some concerns about the results of sub-group analysis for renal function. FDA requested the Cardiovascular Renal Drug Advisory Committee (CRDAC) to discuss about their concerns 1

Roles of Advisory Committee The FDA regularly seeks the advice of its advisory committees as it reviews New Drug Applications (NDA) Purpose of the Advisory Committee meeting is to discuss any issues requested by FDA Advisory Committee makes a recommendation to FDA on whether the NDA should be approved or not FDA takes into account the advice of the committee when a final decision is made about the approval of any NDA 2

Outcome of the Meeting on Oct 30 CRD Advisory Committee voted 9 to 1 to recommend approval of once-daily Edoxaban for the reduction in risk of stroke and systemic embolic events (SEE) in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) Daiichi Sankyo will work with the FDA during continued review of our New Drug Application 3

Features of ENGAGE AF-TIMI 48 Largest NOAC trial (21,105 patients) Longest follow-up (2.8 years) Best follow-up (1 patient without vital status) Highest TTR (68.4%) 4-fold dose range (15 mg - 60 mg) Once-daily dosage 4

ENGAGE AF-TIMI 48 Trial Results ENGAGE met the primary efficacy endpoint of noninferiority for stroke and SEE and superiority for the principal safety endpoint of major bleeding ENGAGE demonstrated significant benefit of Edoxaban compared with warfarin across all key secondary outcomes and predefined composite measures of net clinical outcome Many additional exploratory analysis have been conducted to better understand the results of ENGAGE that were not pre-defined in the protocol 5

Edoxaban 60/30 mg vs Warfarin Risk Differences for 10,000 Patients per Year Primary Endpoints mitt On-Treatment 0 Events/10,000 patients/year -5-10 -15-20 -25-30 -23 *** -6-35 -32 Stroke or SEE * Hemorrhagic stroke Ischemic stroke * p < 0.05 *** p 0.001 6

Edoxaban 60/30 mg vs Warfarin Risk Differences for 10,000 Patients per Year Secondary End Points ITT Overall Events/10,000 patients/year 0-10 -20-30 -40-50 -60-70 -56 * Stroke SEE death -51 * -36-5 CV death All death Myocardial infarction 0 Fatal MIa * p < 0.05 a Fatal MI were 9 in 60/30 group and 9 in warfarin group. No difference between treatment 7

Focus of FDA Advisory Committee Subgroup Analyses A test for heterogeneity was used to evaluate whether observed treatment effects were consistent across various subgroups 2 out of 20 different subgroups evaluated demonstrated a significant interaction for efficacy Protocol defined analysis by Region Exploratory analysis by 3 categories of baseline CrCL 8

Stroke or SEE by Baseline CrCL mitt On-Treatment Pre specified subgroup analysis (defined in Protocol) Creatinine clearance 30-50 ml/min Warfarin Edoxaban 60/30 mg vs warfarin HR (95% CI) Edoxaban 60/30 mg 0.88 (0.58, 1.32) > 50 ml/min Warfarin Edoxaban 60/30 mg 0.76 (0.61, 0.95) Edoxaban 60/30 mg better Warfarin better 0.25 0.5 1 2 Hazard ratio (95% CI) 9

Stroke or SEE by Baseline CrCL mitt On-Treatment Exploratory subgroup analysis (not pre specified) Edoxaban 60/30 mg vs warfarin HR (95% CI) Moderate (30-50) 0.88 (0.58, 1.32) Mild (> 50 - < 80) 0.53 (0.40, 0.70) Normal ( 80) 1.41 (0.97, 2.06) Edoxaban 60/30 mg better Warfarin better 0.25 0.5 1 2 4 Hazard ratio (95% CI) 10

NOAC Stroke or SEE Rates in Contemporary Trials Normal Renal Function Subgroup (CrCL 80 ml/min) NOAC stroke or SEE rate 1.4 1.2 1.0 0.8 0.6 0.4 0.2 0.0 Average NOAC event rate = 1.1 %/year a 0.73 0.99 FDA Briefing Document, table 65, page 156 1.06 1.27 RE-LY ARISTOTLE ENGAGE ROCKET AF dabigatran apixaban edoxaban rivaroxaban CHADS 2 score 2.1 2.1 2.8 3.5 a Ruff C, et al. Lancet. 2014:383:955-962. 11

Warfarin Stroke or SEE Rates in Contemporary Trials Normal Renal Function Subgroup (CrCL 80 ml/min) FDA Briefing Document Table 65, p 156 Warfarin stroke or SEE rate 1.6 1.4 1.2 1.0 0.8 0.6 0.4 0.2 0.0 1.42 Average warfarin event rate = 1.1 /yr a 1.03 1.12 0.76 RE-LY ARISTOTLE ENGAGE ROCKET AF Warfarin Warfarin Warfarin Warfarin CHADS 2 score 2.1 2.1 2.8 3.5 Entire study population. a Ruff C, et al. Lancet. 2014:383:955-962. 12

Stroke or SEE by CrCL Quintiles mitt On-Treatment 3.0 Adapted from FDA briefing document, table 2, p. 18 Post-hoc subgroup analysis by CrCL quintiles 30 mg dose reduced 60-mg dose a Stroke or SEE Event rate, %/yr (95%CI) 2.5 2.0 1.5 1.0 0.5 Edoxaban Warfarin 36/1434 20/1357 0.0 1.7 1.96 1.1 2.3 0.9 1.7 1.1 1.0 1.1 0.6 1st quintile 30-50.6 2nd quintile >50.6-63.6 a Unless patients met prespecified criteria for dose reduction. 3rd quintile >63.6-77.9 CrCL, ml/min 4th quintile >77.9-98.1 5th quintile >98.1 13

Summary ENGAGE met the primary efficacy endpoint of non-inferiority for stroke and SEE and superiority for major bleeding ENGAGE demonstrated significant benefit of Edoxaban compared with warfarin across all key secondary outcomes and predefined composite measures of net clinical outcome In patients with normal renal function (CrCL 80 ml/min), Edoxaban performed similar to other NOACS with an event rate = 1.06%/yr, In the 5th quintile of CrCL, (>98 ml/min), regional variability in warfarin effect and small sample size resulted in a numerical difference in event rates with overlapping confidence intervals 14

Conclusion The use of the Edoxaban 60/30 mg dose regimen for the proposed indication is safe and effective across the entire population of patients studied, including patients with normal renal function, and should be approved to reduce the risk of stroke and systemic embolism in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation 15