Beneficial Effects of Human Papillomavirus Vaccine for Prevention of Cervical Abnormalities in Miyagi, Japan

Similar documents
Up date. sexually transmission HPV HPV HPV. high-risk HPV HPV16, 18, 31, 33, 35, 39, 45, 51, 52, 56, 58, 66, 68 HPV

Understanding Your Pap Test Results

Woo Dae Kang, Ho Sun Choi, Seok Mo Kim

Opinion: Cervical cancer a vaccine preventable disease

Cervical Screening for Dysplasia and Cancer in Patients with HIV

Study Number: Title: Rationale: Phase: Study Period Study Design: Centres: Indication Treatment: Objectives: Primary Outcome/Efficacy Variable:

Cervical cancer is the second most common cancer affecting women worldwide. Cervical

Screening for Cervical Cancer: Demystifying the Guidelines DR. NEERJA SHARMA

Who Should and Who Should Not Be Vaccinated Against Human Papillomavirus Infection?

SCCPS Scientific Committee Position Paper on HPV Vaccination

HPV vaccination How to promote women s health and prevent cancer with good screening strategies, hosted by NFOG

Cervical Cancer Screening for the Primary Care Physician for Average Risk Individuals Clinical Practice Guidelines. June 2013

Supplementary Appendix

Genotype Distribution of Human Papillomaviruses in Japanese Women with Abnormal Cervical Cytology

Making Sense of Cervical Cancer Screening

!"#$%&'(#)*$+&,$-&.#,$/#0()1-$ ),1')$2(%&,2#,%$%(0'#$34567$

The society for lower genital tract disorders since 1964.

Lessons From Cases of Screened Women Who Developed Cervical Carcinoma

Natural History of HPV Infections 15/06/2015. Squamous cell carcinoma Adenocarcinoma

I have no financial interests in any product I will discuss today.

BC Cancer Cervix Screening 2015 Program Results. February 2018

Impact of Human Papillomavirus (HPV)-6/11/16/18 Vaccine on All HPV-Associated Genital Diseases in Young Women

The HPV vaccine is safe.

Human Papillomaviruses and Cancer: Questions and Answers. Key Points. 1. What are human papillomaviruses, and how are they transmitted?

Appropriate Use of Cytology and HPV Testing in the New Cervical Cancer Screening Guidelines

HPV Genotyping: A New Dimension in Cervical Cancer Screening Tests

Copyright. Not for Sale or Commercial Distribution

Cervical Cancer 4/27/2016

32 OBG Management May 2015 Vol. 27 No. 5 obgmanagement.com

Gynecologic Oncology

Cervical Cancer Screening Update. Melissa Hartman, DO Women s Health

The devil is in the details

Editorial Process: Submission:03/31/2018 Acceptance:06/18/2018

2 HPV E1,E2,E4,E5,E6,E7 L1,L2 E6,E7 HPV HPV. Ciuffo Shope Jablonska HPV Zur Hausen HPV HPV16. HPV-genome.

Cervical Screening Results Leading to Detection of Adenocarcinoma in Situ of the Uterine Cervix

The promise of HPV vaccines for Cervical (and other genital cancer) prevention

The HPV Vaccination Programme Early intervention in cancer prevention Northern Ireland

The HPV vaccines are safe.

Dysplasia: layer of the cervical CIN. Intraepithelial Neoplasia. p16 immunostaining. 1, Cervical. Higher-risk, requires CIN.

No Disclosures. Updated Guidelines for Cervical Cancer Screening and Prevention Management of Abnormal Results. Objectives 5/9/2016

Human papillomavirus infections among Japanese

Cervical Dysplasia and HPV

Eradicating Mortality from Cervical Cancer

Chapter 8 Adenocarcinoma

ASCCP 2013 Guidelines for Managing Abnormal Cervical Cancer Screening Tests

What information can change the attitude of teachers toward the human papillomavirus vaccine?

Vasile Goldiş Western University of Arad, Faculty of Medicine, Obstetrics- Gynecology Department, Romania b

Prevalence and Determinants of High-risk Human Papillomavirus Infection in Women with High Socioeconomic Status in Seoul, Republic of Korea

(2016) : 114 (11) ISSN

Clinical Practice Guidelines June 2013

Is Human Papillomavirus (HPV)-associated Esophageal Cancer due to Oral Sex?

The Korean Journal of Cytopathology 15 (1) : 17-27, 2004

Biomed Environ Sci, 2015; 28(1): 80-84

Cervical Cancer Screening - Improving PAP Rates. Objectives

I have no financial interests in any product I will discuss today.

The ATHENA HPV study underrepresents other high-risk HPV genotypes when compared with a diverse New York City population

I have no financial interests in any product I will discuss today.

Reduction in colposcopy workload and associated clinical activity following HPV catch-up vaccination

Evidence-based treatment of a positive HPV DNA test. Th. Agorastos Prof. of Obstetrics & Gynaecology Aristotle University Thessaloniki/GR

Title. CitationCancer Science, 109(6): Issue Date Doc URL. Rights(URL)

Faculty Pap Smear Guidelines: Family Planning Update 2008 Part Two

Should Anal Pap Smears Be a Standard of Care in HIV Management?

The HPV vaccines are safe.

Cytomorphologic Features According to HPV DNA Type in Histologically Proven Cases of the Uterine Cervix

HPV catch-up vaccination of young women: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Focus. A case. I have no conflicts of interest. HPV Vaccination: Science and Practice. Collaborative effort with Karen Smith-McCune, MD, PhD 2/19/2010

Can human papillomavirus (HPV) genotyping classify non-16/18 high-risk HPV infection by risk stratification?

HPV vaccine the global perspective

HUMAN PAPILLOMAVIRUS TESTING

HPV vaccination Where are we now? Where are we going? Margaret Stanley Department of Pathology Cambridge

Acceptable predictive accuracy of histopathology results by colposcopy done by Gynecology residents using Reid index

Largest efficacy trial of a cervical cancer vaccine showed Cervarix protects against the five most common cancercausing

Hongyun WANG 1,2, Xiaodong CHENG 1, Jing YE 1, Xiuyun XU 2, Ying HONG 2, Long SUI 3, Zhixue YOU 4 and Xing XIE 1*

Management Algorithms for Abnormal Cervical Cytology and Colposcopy

Luciano Mariani Istituto Nazionale Tumori Regina Elena, Roma

HPV and Cervical Cancer, Screening and Prevention. John Ragsdale, MD July 12, 2018 CME Lecture Series

Cervical Cancer Prevention in the 21 st Century Changing Paradigms

Streamlining Protocols-From Strategy to Implementation. Doreen Ramogola-Masire Botswana UPenn Partnership June 2014

Cervical Testing and Results Management. An Evidenced-Based Approach April 22nd, Debora Bear, MSN, MPH

HPV the silent killer, Prevention and diagnosis

COLLEGE WOMEN S PERCEPTIONS OF HPV VACCINES AND THEIR PERCEIVED BARRIERS TO ADOPTION OF VACCINATION

Anna R Giuliano, PhD Center for Infection Research in Cancer Moffitt Cancer Center

Cervical-Cancer Screening with Human Papillomavirus and Cytologic Cotesting

IJC International Journal of Cancer

Surveillance after treatment for endometrial cancer

Managament of Abnormal Cervical Cytology and Histology

P16 et Ki67 Biomarkers: new tool for risk management and low grade intraepithelial lesions (LGSIL): be ready for the future.

Prevalence of cervical disease at age 20 after immunisation with bivalent HPV vaccine at age in Scotland: retrospective population study

National Cervical Screening Program MBS Item Descriptors

Tweetable abstract Reduction of hrhpv positivity and CIN in

Comparison of HPV test versus conventional and automation-assisted Pap screening as potential screening tools for preventing cervical cancer

Vaccine Misconceptions and Low HPV Vaccination Take-up Rates in Singapore

Prevention strategies against the human papillomavirus: The effectiveness of vaccination

News. Laboratory NEW GUIDELINES DEMONSTRATE GREATER ROLE FOR HPV TESTING IN CERVICAL CANCER SCREENING TIMOTHY UPHOFF, PHD, DABMG, MLS (ASCP) CM

The effects of immunisation on infection and Disease

Clinical statistics of gynecologic cancers in Japan

EU guidelines for reporting gynaecological cytology

POST-CONIZATION FOLLOW-UP OF PATIENTS WITH HIGH GRADE SQUAMOUS INTRAEPITHELIAL LESION TREATED BY LEEP PROCEDURE: A LITERATURE REVIEW

Prevention of HPV Disease What we know in 2012

HPV TESTING AND THE RENEWAL PROGRAMME. Deborah Neesham Gynaecological Oncologist RWH

Transcription:

Tohoku J. Exp. Med., 2016, 240, 147-151 Beneficial Effects of Vaccine on Cervical Abnormalities 147 Beneficial Effects of Human Papillomavirus Vaccine for Prevention of Cervical Abnormalities in Miyagi, Japan Nobuyoshi Ozawa, 1 Kiyoshi Ito, 2 Toru Tase, 3 Hirohito Metoki 4 and Nobuo Yaegashi 5 1 Ozawa Women s General Clinic, Sendai, Miyagi, Japan 2 Disaster Obstetrics and Gynecology, International Research Institute of Disaster Science, Tohoku University, Sendai, Miyagi, Japan 3 Department of Gynecology, Miyagi Cancer Center, Natori, Miyagi, Japan 4 Division of Public Health, Hygiene and Epidemiology, Tohoku Medical and Pharmaceutical University Faculty of Medicine, Sendai, Miyagi, Japan 5 Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine, Sendai, Miyagi, Japan Prevention of cervical cancer has been unsuccessful in Japan because of low s of cancer screening and. The Vaccine Adverse Review Committee of the Japanese Government investigated 2,475 adverse events and reported 617 (6.9/100,000) severe and 176 (2.0/100,000) with chronic pain. The proactive recommendation for human papillomavirus () has been suspended since June 2013. In this study, we examined and incidence of abnormal cervical cytology in women aged 20 to 24 years attending cancer screening in Miyagi. Among the 3,272 women who underwent a health check in the fiscal year 2014 (April 2014-March 2015), 332 (10.2) received a. The s were 42.3, 10, 17.5, 3.8 and 4.0 in women aged 20, 21, 22, 23 and 24 years, respectively. The s of atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance (ASC-US) or worse were 2.41 (8/332) in women with and 5.03 (148/2,940) in those without, indicating a significant decrease in vaccinated women (p = 0.03). ASC-US were referred to DNA tests. In addition, the s of high grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (HSIL) or worse were 0.30 (1/332) in women with and 0.82 (24/2,940) in those without, showing the marginal decrease in women who were vaccinated (p = 0.3). Thus, this study indicates that is associated with a reduction in the incidence of cervical abnormalities, suggesting a need for scientific discussion of reinstatement of proactive recommendation for vaccine in Japan. Keywords: ASC-US; cervix; cytology; vaccine; uterine cervical cancer screening Tohoku J. Exp. Med., 2016 October, 240 (2), 147-151. 2016 Tohoku University Medical Press Introduction Use of human papillomavirus () vaccine started in Japan in 2009 and governmental support for began in November 2010 for girls aged 12-16 years. Since April 2013, the bivalent and quadrivalent vaccines (Cervarix and Gardasil) have been included in the national immunization program. However, due to potential adverse effects of, such as chronic pain, the proactive recommendation for was suspended in June 2013 (Morimoto et al. 2014; Ueda et al. 2015; Hanley et al. 2015). The Vaccine Adverse Review Committee of the Japanese Ministry of Health investigated adverse events in about 8,898,000 injections from 2010 to 2013. Among 2,475 adverse events, there were 617 (6.9/100,000) severe Received March 25, 2016; revised and accepted September 26, 2016. Published online October 15, 2016; doi: 10.1620/tjem.240.147. Correspondence: Nobuyoshi Ozawa, Ozawa Women s General Clinic, 192 Aramachi, Wakabayashi-ku, Sendai, Miyagi 984-0073, Japan. e-mail:nobuyosi@mva.biglobe.ne.jp 147 and 176 (2.0/100,000) with chronic pain. Adverse events suspected to be associated with vaccine were anaphylaxis (1/960,000), Guillain-Barré syndrome (1/4,300,000), acute disseminated encephalomyelitis (1/4,300,000), and complex regional pain syndrome (1/8,600,000). There were 2,584 (29/100,000) adverse events in about 8,900,000 injections from 2010 to 2014. The follow-up on 1,739 adverse events among 2,584 adverse events revealed that 1,550/1,739 (89.1) had recovered and 186/1,739 (10.7) were not recovered in 2015. The adverse events of chronic pain may represent functional disorders, rather than organic disorders. Regardless of the cause, establishing a system for treatment is important for patients with an adverse event after injection of vaccine.

148 N. Ozawa et al. In July 2016, a representative of an organization of people affected by vaccine reported that sixty-three girls had filed lawsuits against the Japanese Government and two vaccine companies. To date, the Japanese Government has not reinstated a proactive recommendation for use of vaccine. The risks of the vaccine are easily understood, whereas the merits of the vaccine are not easily understood. Therefore, we examined the short-term effects of vaccine in Japan by investigating s and the incidence of abnormal cytology. Subjects and Methods The subjects were women aged 20 to 24 years who underwent uterine cervical cancer screening in Miyagi Prefecture in the fiscal year (FY) 2014 (April 2014-March 2015). We asked each subject to report her history of in a questionnaire. Cervical cytology and history of were also examined using data of the Miyagi Cancer Society. Statistical analysis was performed using the χ 2 test. The present study and the questionnaire were discussed by the Gynecological Exam Committee of Miyagi Cancer Society and were approved by individual municipal governments. This study was approved by the ethics committee of Miyagi Cancer Society (approved number 1508). Results Among the 3,272 women aged 20-24 years who underwent a health check in FY2014, 332 (10.2) had received a (Table 1). The s of were 42.3, 10.0, 17.5, 3.8, and 4.0 in those aged 20, 21, 22, 23, and 24 years, respectively (Table 1). The effect of was evaluated, based on the Bethesda System for cervical cytology (Fig. 1). The overall results of cervical cytology are summarized in Table 2. Cases of atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance (ASC-US) or worse include all categories, except for negative for intraepithelial lesion or malignancy (NILM). ASC-US were subjected to DNA tests and further colposcopic examinations, whereas there was no need to do further examinations for of NILM. The s of ASC-US or worse were 2.41 (8/332) in women with and 5.03 (148/2,940) in without (Table 3). These results indicate that resulted in a significant decrease in the of ASC-US or worse (p = 0.03). The extent of the reduction was 52.1. Table 4 summarizes the of high grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (HSIL) or worse and of low grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (LSIL) or better. Cases of HSIL or worse include HSIL, squamous cell carcinoma (SCC), atypical glandular cells (AGC), adenocarcinoma in situ (AIS), adenocarcinoma, and other malignancy, while of LSIL or better include all categories, except for HSIL, SCC, AGC, AIS, adenocarcinoma and other malignancy (see Fig. 1). The of HSIL or worse were likely to be treated after colposcope. In contrast, most of LSIL or better were not necessarily treated. The s of HSIL or worse were 0.30 (1/332) in vaccinated women and 0.82 (24/2,940) in those without (Table 5). The of HSIL or worse was lower in vaccinated subjects, although the degree of the decline was not statistically significant (p = 0.3). The extent of the reduction was 63.4. Discussion The of women aged 20 years who underwent uterine cervical cancer screening was 42.3 in FY2014. It is likely that women who undergo will receive uterine cervical cancer screening in the coming years. In addition, the beneficial effects of may become more apparent over time. In this study, we compared the results of cervical cytology in women aged 20 to 24 years with and those without. The of ASC-US or worse was significantly lower and the of HSIL or worse tended to be lower in women who had undergone. Several clinical trials have shown the effects of quadrivalent vaccine (Villa et al. 2007) and bivalent vaccine (Paavonen et al. 2009). In Australia, Crowe et al. (2014) showed a 43 decrease in the of atypical cells and a 62 decrease of HSIL in women aged 22-25 years Table 1. Rates of for among the women who underwent cervical cancer screening in FY2014. 20 y.o. 21 y.o. 22 y.o. 23 y.o. 24 y.o. (+) 112 78 75 29 38 332 (-) 153 720 428 728 911 2,940 265 798 503 757 949 3,272 Rate 42.3 10.0 17.5 3.8 4.0 10.2

Beneficial Effects of Vaccine on Cervical Abnormalities 149 1. NILM Benign LSIL or better HSIL or worse 2. ASC-US 3. ASC-H 4. LSIL 5. HSIL 6. SCC 7. AGC 8. AIS 9. Adenocarcinoma 10. Other malignancy ASC-US or worse malignant Fig. 1. The Bethesda System for reporting cervical cytology. The morphologic findings are categorized, as shown below. NILM, negative for intraepithelial lesion or malignancy; ASC-US, atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance; ASC-H, atypical squamous cells, cannot exclude HSIL; LSIL, low grade squamous intraepithelial lesion; HSIL, high grade squamous intraepithelial lesion; SCC, squamous cell carcinoma; AGC, atypical glandular cells; AIS, adenocarcinoma in situ. Table 2. Cases of ASC-US or worse and NILM among the women with and without. ASC-US or worse NILM (+) 8 324 332 (-) 148 2,792 2,940 156 3,116 3,272 ASC-US, atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance; NILM, negative for intraepithelial lesion or malignancy. ASC-US or worse includes all categories except for NILM. Table 3. Rates of ASC-US or worse among the women with and without. 20 y.o. 21 y.o. 22 y.o. 23 y.o. 24 y.o. / screened population Reduction (+) 2 2 2 1 1 8 8/332 2.41* 52.1 (-) 13 36 26 32 41 148 148/2,940 5.03 *P: 0.03. ASC-US, atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance. with three s (after a lapse of 7 years). A report in Denmark (Baldur-Felskov et al. 2014) on uterine cervical cancer screening for women aged 20-21 years showed that the s of atypical cells, cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) 2 and CIN3 decreased by about 60, 73 and 80, respectively. Likewise, in Scotland, Pollock et al. (2014) showed that the of CIN3 decreased by about 55 after. The subjects in Miyagi Prefecture in Japan were examined only a few years after the start of. We thus found that the of ASC-US or worse was significantly lower in vaccinated women and the of HSIL or worse was marginally lower in those who were vaccinated. These data are consistent with the findings in Australia, Demark and Scotland. However, in Japan, due to the potential adverse effects, such as chronic pain, the recommendation for has been suspended since 2013. Only five years have passed since commencement of

150 N. Ozawa et al. Table 4. Cases of HSIL or worse and LSIL or better among the women with and without. HSIL or worse* LSIL or better** (+) 1 331 332 (-) 24 2,916 2,940 25 3,247 3,272 HSIL or worse includes HSIL, squamous cell carcinoma (SCC), adenocarcinoma in situ (AIS), adenocarcinoma and other malignancy. LSIL or better includes negative for intraepithelial lesion or malignancy (NILM), ASC-US, and atypical squamous cells, cannot exclude HSIL (ASC-H). HSIL, high grade squamous intraepithelial lesion; LSIL, low grade squamous intraepithelial lesion. Table 5. Rates of HSIL or worse among the women with and without. 20 y.o. 21 y.o. 22 y.o. 23 y.o. 24 y.o. / screened population Reduction (+) (-) #P: 0.3. 1 0 0 0 0 1 1/332 0.30 # 63.4 1 6 3 6 8 24 24/2,940 0.82 in Japan. The incidence of abnormal cytology found in uterine cervical cancer screening showed a noticeable difference between women with and those without a history of. is associated with a significant reduction in the incidence of ASC-US or worse. Therefore, further follow-up studies of and cervical abnormalities are required in Japan. There is also a need to establish a system for treatment of patients with adverse events after injection of vaccine. Acknowledgments We would like to express our deep gratitude to Mr. Masaaki Otomo, the staff members of the Miyagi Cancer Society, and physicians of the Gynecological Exam Committee for their assistance with data collection and analysis. Conflict of Interest The authors declare no conflict of interest. References Baldur-Felskov, B., Dehlendorff, C., Munk, C. & Kjaer, S.K. (2014) Early impact of human papillomavirus on cervical neoplasia: nationwide follow-up of young Danish women. J. Natl. Cancer Inst., 106, djt460. Crowe, E., Pandeya, N., Brotherton, J.M., Dobson, A.J., Kisely, S., Lambert, S.B. & Whiteman, D.C. (2014) Effectiveness of quadrivalent human papillomavirus vaccine for the prevention of cervical abnormalities: case-control study nested within a population based screening programme in Australia. BMJ, 348, g1458. Hanley, S.J., Yoshioka, E., Ito, Y. & Kishi, R. (2015) crisis in Japan. Lancet, 385, 2571. Morimoto, A., Ueda, Y., Egawa-Takata, T., Yagi, A., Terai, Y., Ohmichi, M., Ichimura, T., Sumi, T., Murata, H., Kanzaki, H., Nakai, H., Mandai, M., Yoshino, K., Fujita, M., Kimura, T., et al. (2014) Effect on in Japan resulting from news report of adverse events and suspension of governmental recommendation for. Jpn. Soc. Clin. Oncol., 20, 549-555. Paavonen, J., Naud, P., Salmeron, J., Wheeler, C.M., Chow, S.N., Apter, D., Kitchener, H., Castellsague, X., Teixeira, J.C., Skinner, S.R., Hedrick, J., Jaisamran, U., Limson, G., Garland, S., Szarewski, A., et al. (2009) Efficacy of human papillomavirus ()-16/18 AS04-adjuvanted vaccine against cervical infection and precancer caused by oncogenic types (PATRICIA): final analysis of a double-blind, randomised study in young women. Lancet, 374, 301-314. Pollock, K.G., Kavanagh, K., Potts, A., Love, J., Cuschieri, K., Cubie, H., Robertson, C., Cruickshank, M., Palmer, T.J., Nicoll, S. & Donaghy, M. (2014) Reduction of low- and highgrade cervical abnormalities associated with high uptake of the bivalent vaccine in Scotland. Br. J. Cancer, 111, 1824-1830. Ueda, Y., Enomoto, T., Sekine, M., Egawa-Tanaka, T., Morimoto, A. & Kimura, T. (2015) Japan s failure to vaccinate girls against human papillomavirus. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol., 212, 405-406. Villa, L.L., Kjaer, K., Paavonen, J., Lehtinen, M., Muñoz, N.,

Beneficial Effects of Vaccine on Cervical Abnormalities 151 Sigurdsson, K., Hermandez-Avila, M., Skjeldestad, F.E., Thoresen, S., García, P., Majewski, S., Dillner, J., Olsson, S.E., Tay, E.H., Bosch, F.X., et al. (2007) Quadrivalent vaccine against human papillomavirus to prevent high-grade cervical lesions. N. Engl. J. Med., 356, 1915-1927.