DETERMINATION OF TRACE ELEMENTS IN WATERS AND WASTES BY INDUCTIVELY COUPLED PLASMA - MASS SPECTROMETRY EPA Method (Revision 5.

Similar documents
Bottom Ash Data Week 37

Bottom Ash Data Week 38

Bottom Ash Data Week 17

Bottom Ash Data Week 30

Bottom Ash Data Week 12

Bottom Ash Data Week 9

Bottom Ash Data Week 49

Bottom Ash Data Week 8

Bottom Ash Data Week 1

GB Translated English of Chinese Standard: GB NATIONAL STANDARD OF THE

Bottom Ash Data Week 40

TRACE ELEMENTS IN URINE. Event #1, 2010

Multi Analyte Custom Grade Solution

CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS. tel: fax:

AAFCO Check Sample 2015 Minerals Program. A Targeted and Engineered Concentration Program

TRACE ELEMENTS IN SERUM

SECTIOn 3. Multi-Element ClP Standards for ICP & ICP-MS

TRACE ELEMENTS IN SERUM. Event #3, 2011

TRACE ELEMENTS IN SERUM

EPA Clean Air Act Performance Audit Samples Stationary Source Audit Sample (SSAS) Table Revision 5, Effective April 15, 2014

TRACE ELEMENTS IN SERUM

TRACE ELEMENTS IN SERUM

Test Report No.T JP Date: FEB 22, 2017 Page 1 of 6

Test Report No.T JP Date: FEB 24, 2017 Page 1 of 6

Analyte Proficiency From All Labs # Analytes: 26 Sample # Statistical Summary # Labs Reporting: 82 Urea Issue Date : 06/30/2016

Appendix H Quality Assurance/Quality Control Review

Test Report No.T TC Date: JUN 29, 2018 Page 1 of 5

Trace Elements in Manure

TOXIC AND ESSENTIAL ELEMENTS

TRACE ELEMENTS IN SERUM. Event #2, 2010

WTQA '99-15th Annual Waste Testing & Quality Assurance Symposium LESSONS LEARNED FROM PERFORMANCE EVALUATION STUDIES

Test Report No.: T TY Date: DEC 19, 2018 Page 1 of 10

Test Report No.: T TY Date: DEC 19, 2018 Page 1 of 12

Liquid Liquid Extraction of Gamma Hydroxybutyric Acid (GHB) in Blood and Urine for GC-MS analysis

Determination of metals in industrial wastewaters by microwave plasmaatomic emission spectrometry

Test Report No.: GZHL IP Date: Sep 01, 2016 Page 1 of 12

Application Note novaa 800 D. Determination of Macro and Trace Minerals as well as Toxic Trace Metals in Powdered Milk. Challenge.

water & dialysate testing services

Routine Analysis of Fortified Foods using the Agilent 7800 ICP-MS

OFFICIAL METHODS FOR CHEMICAL ELEMENTS IN FOOD OF ANIMAL ORIGIN

CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE SGS United Kingdom A UKAS Accredited Test House

STANDARD METHODS FOR CHEMICAL ELEMENTS IN FOOD OF ANIMAL ORIGIN

12423 NE Whitaker Way Portland, OR Cover Letter

TEST REPORT Job No./Report No TR RV1 Date: 25 June 2015 Page 1 of 10

POTENTIALLY g Head Brown Dye Normal V010.08

TEST REPORT Job No./Report No TR Date:24 June 2015 Page 1 of 14

MULTI-COMPONENT ANALYSIS OF HEAVY METALS

Magruder Check Sample: 2016 Year End Summary

Table H3-1 Values Used for Daily Intake/Absorbed Dose Inhalation of Particulates

Data Validation Ascon Water Samples January 2005

Product Stewardship Information Sheet CH350LN

of human hair and nails. Part I. Analytical methodology, Sci. Tot. Environ. 2000, 250/1-3,

Soils Baseline Report Jay Project Appendix A, Soils Data September 2014 ANNEX V: APPENDIX A SOILS DATA

APPENDIX D HAZARDS SCREENING LEVEL HEALTH RISK ASSESSMENT MEMORANDUM

Product Stewardship Information Sheet CH200LN-02

10. TRACE ELEMENTS Introduction. Trace Elements Bristol Bay Drainages

Elemental Scientific. Automated Speciation. prepfast-ic Chromium Speciation for Toy Materials (EN 71-3) ICP ICPMS AA

Test Report. No. NGBHG Date: 20 Jun Page 1 of 6.

NUTRIENT AND HEAVY METAL CONTENTS OF HOG MANURE - EFFECT ON SOIL QUALITY AND PRODUCTIVITY

US EPA SW-846 Method 6010D using the Thermo Scientific icap 7400 ICP-OES Duo

USER SPECIFICATIONS FOR QUINTOLUBRIC 888 Series DESCRIPTION OF THE MOST IMPORTANT PROPERTIES AND THE POSSIBLE VARIATIONS AND TOLERANCES

Wolf Creek Community Alliance 2009 Soil Sampling Report By BJ Schmitt January 26, 2010

March 21, Laboratory Report This Page is to be Stamped Introduction: This report package contains total of 23 pages divided into 3 sections:

Journal of Chemical and Pharmaceutical Research

ICP-OES Applications Overview

PT-2017-NRL-TE-FASFC Determination of As, Asi, Cd, Pb, Cu and Zn in chocolate

METHOD DEVELOPMENT AND VALIDATION: QUANTIFICATION OF METALS IN LIQUIDS AND AEROSOL OF E-CIGARETTES

EN71-2: 2011+A1: 2014 Flammability Test

POLIKAP PVDC COATED FILMS 0Y26, 0X26,0X48

ESSENTIAL TRACE ELEMENTS PREPARED BY B.KIRUTHIGA LECTURER DEPT OF PHARMACEUTICAL CHEMISTRY

COMPOST ANALYSIS REPORT

COMPOST ANALYSIS REPORT

Appendix D: Aerobic and Anaerobic Leaching Tests

TANZANIA BUREAU OF STANDARDS

HAIR ELEMENTS. PATIENT: Number 74 SEX: Female AGE: 49. POTENTIALLY TOXIC ELEMENTS TOXIC RESULT REFERENCE PERCENTILE ELEMENTS µg/g RANGE 68 th 95 th

Mercury Determination in Tuna, CRM 463 by USDA Method CLG- MERC1.01 Using the QuickTrace M-7600 CVAAS Mercury Analyzer

LAB LOCATION: HONG KONG ISSUE DATE: JUN 05, 2017 REPORT NUMBER: PAGE:

GUIDANCE FOR THE ACCREDITATION OF GENERIC METHODS & METHODS OF FLEXIBLE SCOPE OF DETERMINATION OF METALS IN FOODS

ALPHA ANALYTICAL LABORATORIES. Eight Walkup Drive Westborough, Massachusetts (508)

Determination of Copper in Green Olives using ICP-OES

TEST REPORT. LAB LOCATION:TURKEY LAB NO. : (7216) SERVICE TYPE: Regular DATE IN: November 29 th, 2016 DATE OUT: December 01 th, 2016

Applicant Name: GD Sigelei Electroinc Tech Co., Ltd B7 Building, No.1 District, Xicheng Science and Technology Park, Hengli Town, Dongguan, China

Trace Minerals Quality Challenges

A Robustness Study for the Agilent 6470 LC-MS/MS Mass Spectrometer

Technical Report: (9617) SEPTEMBER 26, 2017 Date Received: SEPTEMBER 16, 2017 Page 1 of 10

2 Codex Standard

ISLAND GOLD TOXIC SUBSTANCE REDUCTION PLAN SUMMARY SUPPORTING VARIOUS TOXIC SUBSTANCE REDUCTION PLANS

SAMPLE TEST Toxic Elements Analysis P P P Detection of Amines Derived From Azocolourants and Azodyes NA P P

Toxicology Extraction of Gamma Hydroxybutyric Acid (GHB) in Blood, Urine and Other Fluids

TANZANIA BUREAU OF STANDARDS

Selenium, atomic absorption spectrometric, hydride, automated

Analysis of trace elements in nutraceuticals in compliance with USP chapter <2232> Elemental Contaminants in Dietary Supplements

Appendix A - Human Health Risk Assessment

Leaching Behavior of Coal Combustion Products and the Environmental Implication in Road Construction. Project Progress Report. Jianmin Wang NUTC R201

APPLICANT: LEARNING RESOURCES DATE: Jan 22, NORTH FAIRWAY DRIVE VERNON HILLS, IL USA

Matrix Interferences in ICP-MS: Causes, Effects, and Strategies to Reduce or Eliminate Them

Quality Assurance Project Plan

Transcription:

DETERMINATION OF TRACE ELEMENTS IN WATERS AND WASTES BY INDUCTIVELY COUPLED PLASMA - MASS SPECTROMETRY EPA Method 200.8 (Revision 5.4, 1994) Table 1A. Summary of Holding Times and Preservation for Trace Elements by Inductively Coupled Plasma-Mass Spectrometry (ICP-MS) Analytical Technical and Contract Holding Times Preservation Parameter a Trace Elements Technical without mercury: HNO 3 to ph <2; in Water 180 days from collection; Cool to 4EC ±2EC Technical with mercury: 28 days from collection; Contract without mercury: 35 days from receipt at laboratory; Contract with mercury: 26 days from receipt at laboratory; Trace Elements in Soil Technical without mercury: 180 days from collection; Technical with mercury: 28 days from collection; Contract without mercury: 35 days from receipt at laboratory; Contract with mercury: 26 days from receipt at laboratory; Cool to 4EC ±2EC a Individual target elements are listed in Table 1B. Data Calculations and Reporting Units: Calculate the concentration of individual elements according to the equation specified in Section 12.0 of Method 200.8. Report water sample results in concentration units of micrograms per liter (Fg/L). Report soil sample results on a dry-weight basis in milligrams per kilogram (mg/kg). Report percent solid and percent moisture to the nearest whole percentage point. For rounding results, adhere to the following rules: a) If the number following those to be retained is less than 5, round down; b) If the number following those to be retained is greater than 5, round up; or c) If the number following the last digit to be retained is equal to 5, round down if the digit is even, or round up if the digit is odd. All records of analysis and calculations must be legible and sufficient to recalculate all sample concentrations and QC results. Include an example calculation in the data package. 1 of 5 Revision 03/02/2001

TABLE 1B. Target Elements List, CAS Numbers, and Contract Required Detection Limits (CRDL) for Trace Elements by ICP-MS COMPOUND CAS No. CRDL for Water (µg/l) CRDL for Soil (mg/kg) Aluminum 7429-90-5 30 15 Antimony 7440-36-0 2.0 1.0 Arsenic 7440-38-2 1.0 0.5 Barium 7440-39-3 10 5.0 Beryllium 7440-41-7 1.0 0.5 Cadmium 7440-43-9 1.0 0.5 Chromium 7440-47-3 2.0 1.0 Cobalt 7440-48-4 0.5 0.25 Copper 7440-50-8 2.0 1.0 Lead 7439-92-1 1.0 0.5 Manganese 7439-96-5 0.5 0.25 Mercury 7439-97-6 0.2 0.1 Nickel 7440-02-0 1.0 0.5 Selenium 7782-49-2 5.0 2.5 Silver 7440-22-4 1.0 0.5 Thallium 7440-28-0 1.0 0.5 Vanadium 7440-62-2 1.0 0.5 Zinc 7440-66-6 1.0 0.5 2 of 5 Revision 03/02/2001

Table 2. Summary of Calibration Procedures for Trace Elements by EPA Method 200.8 Calibration Element Frequency Acceptance Criteria Corrective Action ICP-MS Precalibration Routine a Daily prior to instrument calibration Criteria specified in Section 10.2 of Method 200.8 1. Identify the problem. 2. Tuning criteria must be met before any calibration standards, samples, blanks, or QC samples are analyzed Initial Calibration (minimum blank + 1 calibration standard) (ICAL) Initially, Daily; whenever required, due to failure of IPC, QCS, or CRDL Acceptable IPC, QCS, and CRDL standards 1. Terminate analysis 2. Re-calibrate and verify before sample analysis Instrument Performance Check (IPC)(mid range calibration standard) Following the calibration and prior to sample analysis; after every 10 samples; and end of run 90-110% of expected 1. Recalibrate and verify 2. Reanalyze samples back to last good QCS Quality Control Sample (QCS) (Separate source from ICAL standards) Following the IPC and prior to sample analysis 90-110% of expected or limits listed in Table 8 of Method 200.8, whichever is greater 1. Recalibrate and verify 2. Reanalyze samples back to last compliant IPC Calibration Blank Verification Contract Required Detection Limit (CRDL) Verification Standard After ICAL; every IPC; and end of the analytical sequence After QCS, but before sample analysis < CRDL 1. Terminate analysis 2. Identify and document the problem 3. Recalibrate, verify and reanalyze all associated samples 65-135% of expected concentration 1. Reprep and reanalyze standard 2. Recalibrate and verify Internal Standards (IS) b In all samples, standards, and blanks IS area within 60-125% of the IS area in the calibration blank 1. Reanalyze all samples analyzed while system was out-of-control 3 of 5 Revision 03/02/2001

a Perform precalibration routine specified in Section 10.2 of Method 200.8. Instrument stability must be demonstrated by running the tuning solution a minimum of five times with resulting relative standard deviations (RSD) of absolute signals for all analytes of less than 5%. b Section 10.3 of Method 200.8 identifies Table 3 for a list of acceptable internal standards. A minimum of three internal standards must be used. 4 of 5 Revision 03/02/2001

Table 3. Summary of Internal Quality Control Procedures for Trace Elements by EPA Method 200.8 QC Element Frequency Acceptance Criteria Corrective Action Reagent Blank (LRB) One per Batch or SDG a (1 per 20 < CRDL 1. If lowest sample concentration is more than 10X the blank conc., no action 2. If samples are non-detected, no action 3. If detected sample concentrations are less than 10X blank conc., all associated samples must be prepared again with another method blank and reanalyzed Fortified Blank (LFB) One per batch or SDG (1 per 20 85-115% of expected 1. Terminate analysis 2. Identify and document the problem 3. Reanalyze all associated samples Fortified Matrix (LFM) b A minimum of 10% of the field samples 70-130% of expected 1. Flag associated data with an "N" Duplicate Sample (DUP) One per batch or SDG (1 per 20 RPD <20% for samples >5X CRDL; ± CRDL for samples <5X CRDL 1. Flag associated data with an "*" a SDG - Sample Delivery Group - each case of field samples received; or each 20 field samples within a case; or each seven (7) calendar day period during which field samples in a case are received. b If the LFM sample exceeds the calibration range, the sample must be diluted appropriately, re-spiked, and reanalyzed. LFM recovery calculations are not required if the concentration of the analyte added is <30%. Dilute and reanalyze samples with concentrations exceeding the range of the calibration curve. Results for such reanalyses should fall within the mid-range of the calibration curve. Report results and submit documentation for both analyses. 5 of 5 Revision 03/02/2001