IFRA & Safety Assessment of Fragrance Materials

Similar documents
Dermal Sensitization Quantitative Risk Assessment (QRA) For Fragrance Ingredients

Validity of the QRA Methodology & Possibilities of Further Refinement

To: Member Associations (FOR ACTION) Members of the Scientific Committee. Cc: RIFM Customer Associations Members of the JAG.

HOW GOOD ARE VALIDATED METHODS TO PREDICT TOXICITY OF DIFFERENT TYPES OF SUBSTANCES AND PRODUCTS?

SCIErfflFIC COÍYÖVHTTE'E OM COWSUIVCEÄ ЗАЖТУ. 'R«iļH«sl ier a sdfiötffic opaíloa: Submissiën II «n íregraace ysm'frryi acetate -

Regulatory need for non-animal approaches for skin sensitisation hazard assessment. Janine Ezendam

Feasibility of a study to assess the effectiveness of QRA

An Example of Cross-Sector Dialogue at a Global Scale: The Case of Skin Sensitization

5 babes. body splash body lotion body mist body wash body gel. Scent news

Assessing the sensitization/irritation properties of micro organisms. Gregorio Loprieno Prevention Medicine Local Health Authority 2 Lucca (Italy)

TTC NON-CANCER ORAL DATABASES

Consumer Exposure to Fragrance Ingredients: Providing Estimates for Safety Evaluation

SAFETY ASSESSMENT. Product: Bath Potions Range (Ancient Wisdom) Product variants:

Prof. Jean-Pierre Lepoittevin University of Strasbourg, France SCCS WG on methodology Luxemburg, July 1st 2015

Opinion on QRA SCCP 24 June 2008

Re: Evaluation of Silver Substances under Regulation 528/2012

1,1 - iminodipropan-2-ol

Proactive Integration of Occupational Toxicology Assessments into the Drug Development Process

Synribo (Chronic Myeloid Leukemia)

BENZETHONIUM CHLORIDE

Ecopa REACH Animal Use Calculator

REFERENCE CODE GDHCER043 PUBLICAT ION DATE NOVEMBER 2013 PARKINSON S DISEASE - EPIDEMIOLOGY FORECAST TO 2022

EFSA Info Session on Applications. Technical meeting on food flavourings applications. Parma, 20 th January 2015

Genotoxicity Testing Strategies: application of the EFSA SC opinion to different legal frameworks in the food and feed area

1 OJ L 354, , p OJ L 80, , p. 19.

May 24, 2018 OpenTox Asia

Potential Impacts Regarding Human Health Risk Assessment

1 OJ L 354, , p OJ L 80, , p. 19.

1st SETAC Europe Special Science Symposium

MATERIAL SAFETY DATA SHEET

ASSESSING ENDOCRINE DISRUPTING SUBSTANCES

(Text with EEA relevance)

Risk Assessment Report on Tris (nonylphenyl)phosphite (TNPP)

Case Study Application of the WHO Framework for Combined Exposures. Presented by: M.E. (Bette) Meek University of Ottawa

Thought Starter Combined Exposures to Multiple Chemicals Second International Conference on Risk Assessment

Threshold Establishment and Rationale. Douglas J Ball, MS, DABT Research Fellow Pfizer Worldwide R&D

Read-across illustrative example

July 22, 2005 RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED. Racine, Wisconsin

alternative short-chain fluorinated product technology

PRODUCT SAFETY DATA SHEET

Part 2. Chemical and physical aspects

Opinion of the Scientific Panel on Food Additives, Flavourings, Processing Aids and Materials in Contact with Food

Chronic Myeloid Leukemia (CML)

DIGLYCEROL. Solvay Interox. Diglycerol General Overview. Product Data Sheet

Potency Values from the Local Lymph Node Assay: Application to Classification, Labelling and Risk Assessment. Document No. 46

Introduction to the Globally Harmonized System of Classification and Labeling of Chemicals. GHS Training Module 1

Emergency Telephone: (800) Preparation Date: 01/02/2014

Nonclinical Safety Evaluation of Inhalation Drug Products

Case study 1: The AOP-based two out of three skin sensitization ITS for hazard identification

1. IDENTIFICATION OF THE SUBSTANCE/PREPARATION AND THE COMPANY/UNDERTAKING

Risk Assessment Report on. Bis(hydroxylammonium)sulfate. CAS No.: EINECS no.:

VICH GL23: Studies to evaluate the safety of residues of veterinary drugs in human food: genotoxicity testing

MATERIAL SAFETY DATA SHEET ZANFEL VERSION 1.3.0

Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology

EUROPEAN COMMISSION HEALTH & CONSUMER PROTECTION DIRECTORATE-GENERAL. Directorate C - Public Health and Risk Assessment C7 - Risk assessment SCCP

MB Research Labs. Local Lymph Node Assay using Flow Cytometric Endpoints. An Alternative to the Radioactive LLNA. Experience and Innovation

SCCP. Opinion on. Hydroxyisohexyl 3-cyclohexene carboxaldehyde (sensitisation only)

Guidance on use of alternative methods for testing in the safety assessment of cosmetics and quasi-drug

CATEGORY 4 - Rosin adduct esters UVCB CATEGORY JUSTIFICATION DOCUMENT

Sens-it-iv Proof-of-concept studies

Safety Assessment of Benzyl Salicylate As Used in Cosmetics

Technical Datasheet LIFTONIN -XPRESS. 1. Application and Storage. Page 1 of 6. Country of Origin. Nature of Raw Materials

SWEET ALMOND MILK - NAT

Application of human epidemiological studies to pesticide risk assessment

PQRI PODP Extractables & Leachables Workshop Leachable Evaluation of a Container Closure System - What to do When Above the Threshold

REFERENCE CODE GDHCER046 PUBLICAT ION DATE OCTOBER 2013 DIABETIC FOOT ULCERS - EPIDEMIOLOGY FORECAST TO 2022

Guidelines to Commission Regulation (EU) No 655/2013. laying down common criteria for the justification of claims used

Table of Validated and Accepted Alternative Methods

SAMPLE. Sterilization and Disinfectant Equipment Market Outlook in BRICS (Brazil, Russia, India, China, South Africa) to 2018

SAFETY ASSESSMENT. Product Name: Soap Range (by Ancient Wisdom Marketing, Sheffield)

1. IDENTIFICATION. Johnson & Johnson Consumer Companies Inc. 199 Grandview Road, Skillman, New Jersey Canada: USA:

Committee for Risk Assessment RAC. Opinion proposing harmonised classification and labelling at EU level of potassium sorbate

Presentation of the SEURAT-1 COSMOS Project: Prediction of Systemic Toxicity Following Dermal Exposure

Trisodium nitrilotriacetate (NTA)

Reducing the risk of allergen contamination in the factory

SAMPLE. Syringes and Needles Market Outlook in BRICS (Brazil, Russia, India, China, South Africa) to Reference Code: GDME0166BDB

U.S. EPA Strategic Plan to Promote the Development and Implementation of Alternative Test Methods

SAFETY DATA SHEET. Natural Guard Neem RTU. Effective Date: 23-Mar PRODUCT AND COMPANY IDENTIFICATION

Threshold of Toxicological Concern Overview of Ongoing Scientific Developments

MATERIAL SAFETY DATA SHEET

Incorporating Computational Approaches into Safety Assessment

LOREAL USA. February 6, Theresa Michelle, M.D.

Step by Step Approach for GPS Risk Assessment

Opinion on. Risk Assessment Report on NITROBENZENE. Human Health Part. CAS No: EINECS No:

REFERENCE CODE GDHC295DFR PUBLICATION DATE NOVEMBER 2013 ELIDEL (ATOPIC DERMATITIS) FORECAST AND MARKET ANALYSIS TO 2022

Application of the KeratinoSens Assay for Prediction of Dermal Sensitization Hazard for Botanical Cosmetic Ingredients

MATERIAL SAFETY DATA SHEET

HYDROGEN PEROXIDE HUMAN HEALTH EFFECTS. CAS No.: EINECS No.: REPORT VERSION: Draft of 24 April 2001

ANIMAL TESTING IN US EPA S CHEMICAL CHALLENGE SCREENING PROGRAM

MATERIAL SAFETY DATA SHEET

SCCP. Opinion on. Commiphora Erythrea Glabrescens Gum Extract and Oil (Opoponax) (sensitisation only)

FAQs on bisphenol A in consumer products

Webinar: use of alternative methods to animal testing in your REACH registration

TTC and science. Hans Muilerman, PAN Europe

REFERENCE CODE GDHCER052 PUBLICAT ION DATE NOVEMBER 2013 DIABETIC NEPHROPATHY - EPIDEMIOLOGY FORECAST TO 2022

Federation of EU Specialty Food Ingredients Industries

CHARACTERIZING THE IMPACTS OF UNCERTAINTY AND SCIENTIFIC JUDGMENT IN EXPOSURE LIMIT DEVELOPMENT

EUROPEAN COMMISSION HEALTH & CONSUMER PROTECTION DIRECTORATE-GENERAL. Held on 20 September 2005 in Brussels MINUTES

Cyclokat (Dry Eye Syndrome)

Active Beauty Raw Material Information Profile

Transcription:

IFRA & Safety Assessment of Fragrance Materials An Overview Bhashkar Mukerji, PhD, Head, Regulatory & Product Safety, Givaudan

DISCLAIMER The views expressed in this presentation belong to the presenter and not that of Givaudan 3/20/2017 2

This Presentation... What is a Fragrance? What is IFRA? What are IFRA Code of Conduct? What is RIFM? What are IFRA standards? IFRA 48th amendment Safety Assessment of fragrances Quantitative Risk Assessment for Dermal Sensitization Conclusions 3/20/2017 3

WHAT IS A FRAGRANCE? A Fragrance is most often a mixture of more than one chemical entity It is used to impart certain cosmetic benefits ; mostly used at relatively low concentrations, except in fine fragrances It could be composed of fully synthetic components or natural or a mix of both, etc. Safety assessment follows the principles of hazard evaluation and risk assessment 3/20/2017 4

Three Evaporation Stages Top Note (Extremely Volatile) Light, Fresh citrus, fruity, green Mid Note (Intermediate Volatility) Round, Warm floral, spicy, aldehydic Base Note (Extremely Low Volatility) Heavy, Rich woody, powdery, musky

http://www.ifraorg.org/ RESPONSIBILITY 3/20/2017 6

http://www.ifraorg.org/ INTERNATIONAL FRAGRANCE ASSOCIATION FOUNDED IN 1973 ; HQ IN BRUSSELS VOICE OF THE FRAGRANCE INDUSTRY PROMOTES THE SAFETY AND BENEFITS OF THE FRAGRANCE INDUSTRY S PRODUCTS ITS MEMBERS ACCOUNT FOR 90% OF THE GLOBAL PRODUCTION VOLUME OF FRAGRANCE COMPOUNDS 3/20/2017 7

http://www.ifraorg.org/ ESTABLISHED THE IFRA CODE OF PRACTICE FRAGRANCE INGREDIENTS AND FRAGRANCE COMPOUNDS ARE SUBJECT TO INTERNATIONAL REGULATORY REGIMES WORLDWIDE ISSUES AN IFRA STANDARD. IFRA STANDARDS CAN EITHER PROHIBIT, RESTRICT OR SET PURITY REQUIREMENTS FOR SPECIFIC INGREDIENTS FINAL RESPONSIBILITY OF SAFETY OF INGREDIENTS AND FINISHED FRAGRANCES RESTS WITH IFRA MEMBERS 3/20/2017 8

http://www.ifraorg.org/ IFRA STANDARDS PUBLISHED EVERY 2 YEARS PREPARED BY THE IFRA SCIENTIFIC COMMITTEE ON THE BASIS OF THE DECISIONS MADE BY REXPAN (THE RIFM EXPERT PANEL) STANDARDS SUBJECT TO REGULAR CHANGES AS NEW INFORMATION RELEVANT TO THE SAFETY OF FRAGRANCE INGREDIENTS BECOME AVAILABLE MEMBERS MUST COMPLY WITH IFRA STANDARDS NOT FOLLOWING STANDARDS IS DEEMED AS VIOLATION OF THE IFRA CODE OF CONDUCT 3/20/2017 9

http://www.rifm.org/index.php 3/20/2017 10

http://www.rifm.org/index.php RESEARCH INSTITUTE FOR FRAGRANCE MATERIALS (RIFM) OBTAINS AND EVALUATES SAFETY DATA ON FRAGRANCE INGREDIENTS WORKS THROUGH INDEPENDENT, INTERNATIONAL PANEL OF EXPERTS WITH NO TIES TO THE FRAGRANCE INDUSTRY 3/20/2017 11

IFRA RIFM COLLABORATION International Fragrance Association Code of Practice Standards Regional Associations EFFA (EU) Regulation proposals National Associations JFFMA (Japan) FMA (USA) SFFIA (Switzerland) DRH (Germany) Full Member Companies Givaudan Firmenich IFF etc. Self Regulation Research Institute for Fragrance Materials Scientific Database Testing of Fragrance Materials Industry Standards External Laboratories & Scientific Experts ACA PROPERTY. NOT TO BE REPRODUCED WITHOUT PERMISSION OF ACA 3/20/2017 12

Industry Coordination Board RIFM REXPAN Ingredient safety assessments RIFM STEERING COMMITTEE Approves animal testing where needed. Approves high level decisions IFRA Standard (if necessary) Research RIFM CORE TEAMS Genotoxicity Sensitization Repeat Dose Reproductive 3/20/2017 13

Example of an IFRA Standard - 1 3/20/2017 14

Example of an IFRA Standard - 2 3/20/2017 15

Example of an IFRA Standard - 3 3/20/2017 16

Example of an IFRA Standard - 4 3/20/2017 17

Example of an IFRA Certificate 3/20/2017 18

Standards Page - http://www.ifraorg.org/en-us/standardslibrary/open/23302#.vxvtltkqqko 3/20/2017 19

IFRA 48 TH AMENDMENT 3/20/2017 20

IFRA 48 implementation timeline forecast 3/20/2017 21 2 bans 3 new Standards for restrictions 1 correction & 7 revised standards policy on photoxic ingredients

2 new banned materials Bans due to insufficient data for safety assessment on : Sorbic alcohol (Hexadienol) 2,4-Dodecadien-1-ol, 3/20/2017 22

Deadlines summary for existing compounds The timelines refer to the fragrances compound, not to the end product Regulation Constraint 2014 2015 2016 2017 IFRA 47 IFRA 47 IFRA 48 IFRA 48 Bans & restrictions New elements of specification Bans and restrictions (including new CAS # added & combined phototoxicity removal except on FCs) Updated specifications August 10 January 10 August 10 January 10 3/20/2017 23

Safety Asessment of Fragrances 3/20/2017 24

Risk vs. Hazard RISK = HAZARD X EXPOSURE 3/20/2017 25

Safety Assessment of Fragrances Fragrance ingredients Fragrance compounds Fragranced end-products Toxicology studies Hazard assessment Ingredients Risk assessment IFRA Use limits Specification/ Prohibitions Fragrances End-product manufacturers Safety review Risk assessment 3/20/2017 26

Safety Assessment of New Fragrance Ingredients Predict Compare with existing structurally similar ingredients In silico evaluation using QSAR tools Characterize In vitro skin sensitization assays (e.g., KeratinoSens) Ex vivo skin sensitization assay (e.g., LLNA) Bacterial reverse mutation test In vitro metabolism Register Acute oral/dermal/inhalation toxicity In vitro skin/eye irritation In vivo acute skin/eye irritation In vitro chromosomal aberration test Repeated dose oral toxicity study (28-day) Follow up studies (e.g., in vivo micronucleus test) Risk assessment for endpoints (e.g., sensitization) and/or uses of concern (cosmetics) 3/20/2017 27

QRA for Skin Sensitization Dermal sensitization: human / guinea pig / LLNA Weight of evidence approach no expected sensitizing induction level (NESIL) Converted to dose/unit area for NESIL determination NOEL from HRIPT (>100 human subjects) used to set NESIL LOEL human test takes precedence over NOEL from HRIPT NOEL from human test can be used if confirmed by LLNA (if no HRIPT) Guinea pig results not to be used alone to set NESIL Results from LLNA confirmed by HRIPT 3/20/2017 28

Risk Assessment for Dermal Sensitization Extrapolation from controlled experimental situation to real life exposure scenarios Inter-individual susceptibility (10) Matrix effects (product category specific) Consumer products are much more complex than common vehicles in experiments Use considerations (product category specific) Product used vs. experimental conditions Site Barrier integrity Occlusion Api et.al., Regul Toxicol Pharmacol, 52: 3, 2008. 29

Risk Assessment for Dermal Sensitization Exposure Assessment Careful and conservative determination of data to use Exposed populations, magnitude of exposure under various conditions, duration, frequency, etc. Calculated as dose/unit area/per diem to allow direct comparison When multiple sources of exposure exist, select the highest to be conservative For surface area measurements for same area of the body, select smallest surface area to be conservative Exposure assessment for shampoos: Calculated exposure = 23,630 mg/day (CTFA) Area = 1430 cm 2 (EPA, 1997; area hands + ½ head) Retention Factor = 1% or 0.01 (SCCNFP, 2003) Exposure = 23,630 mg/day * 0.01 1430 cm 2 = 0.17 mg/cm 2 /day 3/20/2017 30

Example: Risk Assessment for Dermal Sensitization Risk Characterization Acceptable Exposure Level (AEL) = WoE NESIL / SAF Comparison of Acceptable Exposure Level (AEL) to calculated Consumer Exposure Level (CEL): AEL > CEL to be acceptable Api et.al., Regul Toxicol Pharmacol, 52: 3, 2008. 3/20/2017 31

IFRA Product Categories 3/20/2017 32

CONCLUSIONS 1. Fragrance materials are rigorously assessed for safety 2. Safety assessment of fragrance materials is subject to scrutiny by regulatory authorities and end-product manufacturers 3. Large amount of toxicity data are available for fragrance materials 4. Advanced risk assessment methodology for critical endpoint 5. Fragrance compounds are complex mixtures and adequately assessed 3/20/2017 33

CONCLUSIONS 6. IFRA RIFM collaboration helpful in managing fragrance safety assessment 7. Fragrance industry is at the forefront of developing novel animal alternatives 8. NO NEED FOR ADDITIONAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT 9. IFRA ASSESSMENT COMPREHENSIVE, ALLOWS SIGNIFICANT MARGIN OF SAFETY 10. CONSTANTLY MONITORED, PEER REVIEWED AND UPDATED 11. LINKED TO GLOBAL REGULATORY AND SCIENTIFIC SCRUTINY 3/20/2017 34

Terimah Kasih! Contact Bhashkar Mukerji Email: Bhashkar.Mukerji@Givaudan.com Mobile: +65 84843772 Confidential business and proprietary information of Givaudan, may not be copied or distributed to anyone without the express written permission of Givaudan