Autism Diagnostic Observation Schedule Second Edition (ADOS-2)

Similar documents
Diagnosis Advancements. Licensee OAPL (UK) Creative Commons Attribution License (CC-BY) Research study

The use of Autism Mental Status Exam in an Italian sample. A brief report

The Pennsylvania State University. The Graduate School. College of Education VALIDITY AND DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY OF SCORES FROM THE AUTISM

Brief Report: Interrater Reliability of Clinical Diagnosis and DSM-IV Criteria for Autistic Disorder: Results of the DSM-IV Autism Field Trial

The Autism Diagnostic Observation Schedule, Module 4 de Bildt, Annelies; Sytema, Sjoerd; Meffert, Harma; Bastiaansen, Jojanneke

Factors Influencing How Parents Report. Autism Symptoms on the ADI-R

References to Relevant Papers. ADOS Standardisation / Psychometrics. BeginningwithA

Ados 2 Manual. Ados 2 Manual

Supplementary Information. Enhancing studies of the connectome in autism using the Autism Brain Imaging Data Exchange II

UC Merced UC Merced Undergraduate Research Journal

University of Groningen. The Friesland study de Bildt, Annelies

Update in Diagnosis of Autism พญ. จ ฑามาส (ว โรจน อน นต ) วรโชต ก าจร ภาคว ชาก มารเวชศาสตร ม.สงขลานคร นทร 21 กรกฎาคม 2554

B. Positions and Honors

University of Groningen. The Friesland study Bildt, Alida Anna de

Facilitating the identification of autism spectrum disorders in school- age children

Cover Page. The handle holds various files of this Leiden University dissertation.

Overview. Need for screening. Screening for Autism Spectrum Disorders and Neurodevelopmental Disorders

A Validation Study of the Korean Child Behavior Checklist in the Diagnosis of Autism Spectrum Disorder and Non-Autism Spectrum Disorder

Validating the Developmental, Diagnostic and Dimensional. Interview - Short Form Adult Version (3Di-sva): a. adults. Kiri Clarke

Comparison between a Mandarin Chinese version of the Childhood Autism Spectrum Test and the Clancy Autism Behaviour Scale in mainland China

INTRODUCTION. Hyung Seo Park, So Young Yi, Sun Ah Yoon, and Soon-Beom Hong. 172 Copyright c 2018 Korean Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry

ADOS 2 CLINICIAN COURSE WITH

Diagnostic Evaluation of Autism Spectrum Disorders

Age of diagnosis for Autism Spectrum Disorders. Reasons for a later diagnosis: Earlier identification = Earlier intervention

The Autism Spectrum Disorder Decision Tree (ASD-DT) for the PDDBI:

Supplementary Online Content

DSM-5 Autism Criteria Applied to Toddlers with DSM-IV-TR Autism

Table 1: Comparison of DSM-5 and DSM-IV-TR Diagnostic Criteria. Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD) Pervasive Developmental Disorders Key Differences

A Comparison Between High-Risk and Low-Risk Children with Autism Spectrum Disorder

TIME-A - PI:Christian Gold

Dissertation. Sarah L. Leone, M.A. Psychology Graduate Program. The Ohio State University. Dissertation Committee: Luc Lecavalier, Advisor

Diagnosis: screening, surveillance, assessment, and formulation

Testing the Construct Validity of Proposed Criteria for DSM-5 Autism Spectrum Disorder

Diagnostic Evaluation

First Concerns. Wh at if I (o r t h e pa r e n t s) h av e c o n c e r n s a b o u t a pat i e n t? 10 Toolkit for Medical Professionals

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION

USE OF THE MULLEN SCALES OF EARLY LEARNING FOR THE ASSESSMENT OF YOUNG CHILDREN WITH AUTISM SPECTRUM DISORDERS

University of Groningen. The Friesland study de Bildt, Annelies

Background on the issue Previous study with adolescents and adults: Current NIH R03 study examining ADI-R for Spanish speaking Latinos

The ADOS, AStandardized Instrument for the Diagnosis of Children with Autism. Lord, Rutter, DiLavore, Risi (1999)

Comparison of Clinic & Home Observations of Social Communication Red Flags in Toddlers with ASD

Restricted and Repetitive Behaviors as Predictors of Outcome in Autism Spectrum Disorders

Red flag signs for Autism

Mullen Scales of Early Learning: AGS Edition

University of Bristol - Explore Bristol Research. Peer reviewed version. Link to published version (if available): /aur.

AN EVALUATION OF PREFERENCE FOR VIDEO AND IN VIVO MODELING KANEEN B. GEIGER AND LINDA A. LEBLANC

Research in Autism Spectrum Disorders

RESEARCH ARTICLE Stability of Diagnostic Assessment for Autism Spectrum Disorder between 18 and 36 Months in a High-Risk Cohort

Loss of Language in Early Development of Autism. and Specific Language Impairment. Andrew Pickles. University of Manchester.

Psychometric Properties of Diagnostic Assessment Instrumentsfor Autism Spectrum Disorders in a Community Sample Aged 2 Through 17 Years

Structural equation analysis of a hypothesised symptom model in the autism spectrum

Follow-Up to an Early Intervention for Parents of Young Children With or At-Risk for Autism. Spectrum Disorder. An honors thesis presented to the

Fact Sheet 8. DSM-5 and Autism Spectrum Disorder

Research Article The Michigan Autism Spectrum Questionnaire: A Rating Scale for High-Functioning Autism Spectrum Disorders

Identifying students with autism spectrum disorders: A review of selected screening tools

Deconstructing the DSM-5 By Jason H. King

ADI and Latinos. The Use of the Autism Diagnostic Interview-Revised with a Latino Population of. Adolescents and Adults with Autism

University of Groningen. Autism spectrum disorders Lang, Natasja Desirée Julia van

ABSTRACT. Measures of autism spectrum disorders (ASDs) provide critical information relevant

! Introduction:! ! Prosodic abilities!! Prosody and Autism! !! Developmental profile of prosodic abilities for Portuguese speakers!

MEDICAL POLICY SUBJECT: APPLIED BEHAVIOR ANALYSIS FOR THE TREATMENT OF AUTISM SPECTRUM DISORDERS

The Clinical Progress of Autism Spectrum Disorders in China. Xi an children s hospital Yanni Chen MD.PhD

The Nuts and Bolts of Diagnosing Autism Spectrum Disorders In Young Children. Overview

Chapter 2 Early Diagnostic Assessment

The Identification of Autism Spectrum Disorders

Nevada Journal of Public Health

First encounters with a health care provider

When does the Autism Spectrum Screening Questionnaire (ASSQ) predict autism spectrum disorders in primary school-aged children?

Diagnostic Interview for Social and Communication Disorders

A Longitudinal Pilot Study of Behavioral Abnormalities in Children with Autism

Stability of the ADI-R

University of Groningen. The Friesland study Bildt, Alida Anna de

Audiovisual speech perception in children with autism spectrum disorders and typical controls

2015. This manuscript version is made available under the CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 license

The Reliability and Validity of the Korean Version of the Autism-Spectrum Quotient

School of Public Health

Behavior Rating Scales as Screeners for Autism? A Closer Look at the CAB-P and CBCL/1.5-5

The Gender of Participants in Published Research Involving People with Autism Spectrum Disorders

Sex Differences in Diagnosis and Clinical Phenotypes of Chinese Children with Autism Spectrum Disorder

Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences 5 (2010) WCPCG-2010

Emotional and behavioural problems in young children with autism spectrum disorder

Presentation Outline:

Analysis of new diagnostic criteria for autism sparks debate

Subtypes of Toddlers with Autism Spectrum Disorders: Implications for Early and Future Diagnosis

MEASURING AUTISM TRAITS IN A WELL-DEFINED SAMPLE: A CONFIRMATORY FACTOR ANALYSIS OF THE SOCIAL RESPONSIVENESS SCALE JAIMI DONALD MCDONOUGH

Clinical Study Comparison of Adaptive Behavior Measures for Children with HFASDs

Non-ASD Outcomes at 36 Months in Siblings at Familial Risk for Autism Spectrum. Disorder (ASD): A Baby Siblings Research Consortium (BSRC) Study

ABAS-II Ratings and Correlates of Adaptive Behavior in Children with HFASDs

MEDICAL POLICY SUBJECT: APPLIED BEHAVIOR ANALYSIS FOR THE TREATMENT OF AUTISM SPECTRUM DISORDERS

RUNNING HEAD: Socio-Communication Deficits Of Children With Williams. Socio-Communication Deficits of children with Williams Syndrome: Overlap with

DSM 5 Criteria to Diagnose Autism

Instruments for Measuring Repetitive Behaviours.

This version was downloaded from Northumbria Research Link:

RESEARCH ARTICLE Language Outcomes of Toddlers With Autism Spectrum Disorders: A Two Year Follow-Up

AUTISM SPECTRUM DISORDER: DSM-5 DIAGNOSTIC CRITERIA. Lisa Joseph, Ph.D.

Dr. Pushpal Desarkar & Dr. Anna M. Palucka. Presentation objectives / overview. Why do we use the DSM?

Atypical Sensory Behaviors in Young Children with Autism Spectrum Disorders. Rosalind Schaefer Oti

Determining Preference for Social Interaction. A Thesis Presented. Hillary S. Balog. In partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of

Transcription:

Overview The Autism Diagnostic Observation Schedule Second Edition (ADOS-2) is an updated, semi-structured, standardized observational assessment tool designed to assess autism spectrum disorders in children, adolescents, and adults (Lord, Rutter, DiLavore, Risi, Gotham, & Bishop, 2012). The ADOS-2 assesses communication, social interaction, play, and restricted and repetitive behaviors. The instrument consists of five modules selected based on age and level of expressive language. The ADOS-2 has updated protocols, revised algorithms, and a Toddler Module for children between 12 and 30 months. Observations are recorded and scored by the examiner. Modules 1 through 4 provide cutoff scores to aid in interpretation. The Toddler Module provides ranges of concern rather than cutoff scores. Administration time is 40 to 60 minutes. Summary Name of Tool/Author Screening/ Diagnosis Age Range* Method of Administration/Format Approximate Time to Administer Subscales Autism Diagnostic Observation Schedule Second Edition** (Lord, Rutter, DiLavore, Risi, Gotham, & Bishop, 2012)**. D 1 year to adult Clinician engages the examinee in a range of activities using interactive stimulus materials 40 60 min. Modules 1 4 yield algorithm cutoff scores for autism and autism spectrum. Toddler Module yields ranges of concern to assist in forming clinical impressions. *In years except where noted. **Instrument requires special training to administer. Availability: Western Psychological Services, http://bit.ly/1mpz859

Research Author (Year) Age Range (in years) Sample Size Topic Addressed Outcome Gray, Tonge, & Sweeney (2008) 1.5 4.5 209 Discriminative ADI-R and AU = 0.46 ADOS and AU = 0.73 ADSO and AU = 0.62 ADI-R and ADOS = 0.35 (Cohen s kappa) Gotham, Risi, Pickles, & Lord (2007) 1.2 16 1,630 Diagnostic Use of new algorithms: Sensitivity: AU vs. Non-Spectrum = 85-96 Non-AU AU vs. Non-Spectrum = 61-90; AU vs. Non-Spectrum = 50-97 Non-AU AU vs. Non-Spectrum = 12-79 (lowest for Module 1 no words) New algorithms increase specificity 12-31% in classifying Non-AU AU in lowerfunctioning subjects

Lord, Risi, Lambrecht, Cook, Leventhal, et al. (2000) Module 1: 1.25-10 Module 2: 2-7 Module 3: 3-20 Module 4: 10-40 54 55 59 45 (223-Total) Interrater and Test-retest reliability and discriminative (Interclass correlations, weighted kappas) Interrater: Social = 0.93 Communication = 0.84 Social Communication = 0.92 Restricted Repetitive 0.82 Test-Retest Social = 0.78 Communication = 0.73 Social Communication = 0.82 Restricted Repetitive = 0.59 Discriminative Validity: 95% for AU 92% for Non-Spectrum 33% for PDD-NOS as having Non-AU AU (53% of PDD-NOS fell in the AU range); AU vs. PDD-NOS and Non-Spectrum = 68-79, AU and PDD-NOS vs. Non Spectrum = 87-94, AU to Non-Spectrum = 93-100, PDD-NOS to Non-Spectrum 88+94; Sensitivity: AU vs. PDD-NOS and Non-Spectrum = 87-100, AU and PDD-NOS vs. Non-Spectrum = 90-97, AU to Non-Spectrum = 93-100, PDD-NOS to Non-Spectrum = 80-94 debildt, Sytema, Ketelaars, Kraijer, Molder, et al. (2004) 5 20 184 Criterion and reliability Sensitivity: PDD: ADOS-G =.874 PDD: ADI-R =.716 AD: ADOS-G =.917 AD: ADI-R =.771 PDD: ADOS-G =.472 PDD: ADI-R =.787 AD: ADOS-G =.647 AD: ADI-R =.632 Agreement (percentage): Age 5-8 = 83.4 for AD, 81.0 for PDD Age 8+ = 57.8 for AD, 58.5 for PDD Total = 63.6 for AD, 63.6 for PDD

Overton, Fielding, & Garcia (2008) 1.67 16 26 ADOS algorithm scores compared to new algorithm scores +/- Revised algorithm resulted in better accuracy for more severe group LeCouter, Haden, Hammal,& McConachie (2008) 2 4 101 Concurrent Agreement with ADOS: AU Social Interaction = 78%, AU Communication= 74%; Above/below AU cutoff = 81%; Above/below spectrum cutoff = 78% Risi, Lord, Gotham, Corsello, Chrysler, et al. (2006) Mazefsky & Oswald (2006) 1.5 14 1,297 Diagnostic sensitivity and specificity 2 8 78 Discriminative Strict autism criteria used in combination with ADI- R: 80% or higher for U.S. sample, 75% or higher for Canadian sample; lower for single use and use for other PDDs 77% agreement with team diagnosis References debildt, A., Sytema, S., Ketelaars, C., Kraijer, D., Mulder, E., Volkmar, F., & Minderaa, R. (2004). Interrelationship between Autism Diagnostic Observation Schedule Generic (ADOS-G), Autism Diagnostic Interview Revised (ADI-R), and the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-IV-TR) Classification in children and adolescents with mental retardation. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 34(2), 129 137. Gotham, K., Risi, S., Pickles, A., & Lord, C. (2007). The Autism Diagnostic Observation Schedule: Revised algorithms for improved diagnostic. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 37(4), 613 627. Gray, K. M., Tonge, B. J., & Sweeney, D. J. (2008). Using the Autism Diagnostic Interview-Revised and the Autism Diagnostic Observation Schedule with young children with developmental delay: Evaluating diagnosis. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 38(4), 657 667.

LeCouteur, A., Haden, G., Hammal, D., & McConachie, H. (2008). Diagnosing autism spectrum disorders in pre-school children using two standardized assessment instruments: the ADI-R and the ADOS. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 38(2), 362 372. Lord, C., Risi, S. Lambrecht, L., Cook, E. H., Leventhal, B. L., et al. (2000). The Autism Diagnostic Observation Schedule Generic: A standard measure of social and communication deficits associated with the spectrum of autism. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 30(3), 205 233. Lord, C., Rutter, M., DiLavore, P. C., Risi, S., Gotham, K., & Bishop, S. (2012). Autism diagnostic observation schedule (2 nd ed.). Torrance, CA: Western Psychological Services. Mazefsky, C. A., & Oswald, D.P. (2006). The discriminative ability and diagnostic utility of the ADOS-G, ADI-R, and GARS for children in a clinical setting. Autism, 10(6), 533 549. Overton, T., Fielding, C., & Garcia, D. (2008). Brief report: Exploratory analysis of the ADOS Revised Algorithm: Specificity and predictive value with Hispanic children referred for autism spectrum disorders. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 38(6), 1166 1169. Risi, S., Lord, C., Gotham, K., Corsello, C., Chrysler, C., Szatmari, P. et al. (2006). Combining information from multiple sources in the diagnosis of autism spectrum disorders. Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 45(9), 1094 1103.